From nobody Fri May 2 07:57:43 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083621A701C for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 07:57:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.15 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zc4T1UfLc2_3 for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 07:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BCA1A7013 for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 07:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDE810589 for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 16:57:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 513A610583 for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 16:57:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5363B260.9060105@restena.lu> Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 16:57:36 +0200 From: Stefan Winter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radext@ietf.org References: <5357B645.5050105@restena.lu> In-Reply-To: <5357B645.5050105@restena.lu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LquuqBKMMQLqhJLrHUXku33DggRfRnFWD" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/gKTtZXRJRyFTBNB8FFyOk9iDRDU Subject: Re: [radext] Adoption of draft-cheng-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt ? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 14:57:42 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --LquuqBKMMQLqhJLrHUXku33DggRfRnFWD Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080300040105070307070606" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080300040105070307070606 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all, > The call for adoption ends 7 May 2014. That day is not long from now, and there was only one single opinion on the list. Could all please consider looking at the document, and let us know your view on this? Greetings, Stefan Winter --=20 Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - R=E9seau T=E9l=E9informatique de l'Education National= e et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473 PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 --------------080300040105070307070606 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="0x8A39DC66.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0x8A39DC66.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) mQINBFIplEwBEADTSz+DS8nio+RSvfSLLfaOnCGi1nqpn8Pb1laVUyEvnAAzZ5je miS88GxfiDH6hUGlWzcaW0hCfUHGiohr485adbjxRksPngWgAt/1bRxpifsW3zOb Fjgog01WWQV5Sihlwc4zr8zvYbFA5BJZ6YdkR9C5J015riv5OS30WTjA65SSXgYr b7zJWPwmegTFwE093uBFvC39waz3xYpVu5j87nO6w2MVQt/8sY2/2BFPEq+xfOaj l18UEwc7w8SCgnZdlVNcmEK4UBvJuwS/1lsR2JeQa8Gu1EDxC7PRgMgNXsDSWnnB e9aVmfG54+6ILe1QH2dwk9sPBQT5w2+vjijrb3Dv9ur+1kN+TNU2XE436jVpnnY/ 3OsLdix30STQn4Q/XOm7YoVMeDwwviefilRxzK0dXA+wKj92T68Od82CFxuZqPAg BCVmWfQM91iK9piqFK+QP+R3vF6+NGDBdwbe68iVKs0v5L8XmbxBQndjpmo+lo2a smBR2TAIfZHaKdgtBw13u3GPVVKlg/Mpko8ki9JOSem2aFyi3kQEVKptWgXT3POl 97DWJzsR5VyKz6GOx9kJAEISRyLZwm0wqh8+9LCza5oeIKW381lzq1b9x30vOh8C BSQQJ+cG9ko0yPHAj7Suw2TmPXx1qMctmE6Ahq82ZW30SljdZby8WQuR2wARAQAB tDxTdGVmYW4gV2ludGVyIChSRVNURU5BIGtleSAyMDEzKykgPHN0ZWZhbi53aW50 ZXJAcmVzdGVuYS5sdT6JAjkEEwECACMFAlIplEwCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZj7/D/99hVS+mJr8dSPCaDaUFFxBiT2eI1Lo R8VKEerTCRw5BsdL6pN2eRJZ9NmsqWo1ynWVHEzO91bNZ+oZGgyoNohcBAI7p+r0 qUTzkyqwdZO4kMm0pqKoM9xkP3tf2mjGujKjOz4Y7S7wnz2ZFokeUsecoRVJF/++ /qHnmeWLn44J1HUKLHYCjMu+QXGOgGXgz024jQ5eUrnPwzNp0Z90AFVHlWC+bymt y/ToIUUCQqS5Ff0jzdWLd8U695OG9iGvjBQT1LdEjsfbAwuKV5UcnpxNqUpUwKa5 9hdX5/2cMZP07FI1UXwnBlxa8rJfdb13FLjSKX4vUUHedYUZMjMPgcwl1a+zGE22 lHiSQWgP8QLA/W3BLsi22ERCEPZBfexOeOtaWIItDIz18fIaQoMDoRPshzar0JI2 CzLYsyeKySAtYJEHFVoLmMvhkwzBmgqA/BEswUA67CfCr1jFHRXdpmWM7YkyAmMa 9q6LwquWKS5+MXlUXe/3oZUcgpw/T9Uuy3Jo3RdS7B3jFcWaVr6KsO/A9u1gr/aY n5M+iJTQSj4vzqtkQaJTpSspRZoKa66HZt3IwSYiDiYZqtM83ynuj9kjnZzGfnuT aNIi996q6Mptr33mOzIE1wmMqnJYwTr3EcNtf483q/qrJwh5ES8Q9xY7aat/ZcSl 8fKubW4TlfVr8YhGBBARAgAGBQJSKZUGAAoJEPo5vdH/HhVmYTgAn24eoqO/O98o vNpt08Uab/+/tmYKAJ9kjXm9Njz5h33efzeelZUa484rr7kCDQRSKZRMARAAvBPp n7FQq7LQ5glohtbL6XIEo1U4X67S0TzUYieENSWSVYuWYIhCBldmWdmH8Bpj/qHe qdon7v+SLtR4WngzMR9toupKcFfHnbP9kpazTSB2ySHxXWGX1gJOpPXdCcg9iveK BHEsDn00ThTcPsvtXpnnzET16pXIvOXO0bxTmVZ4INIF1SWgvYma/g8kBbgXLpkj 8tOywBqFiiYPEZlDeCxDHiMgUDh6olda9K/0TZFTdMPUgjKuubfAeaDNCOrVt4Rj mFOaRLikcZocmgJhm3z/j25x7/mnNu+0di1H/S67YGQJ+pqCFInzIXDx7aRW2+JC iqsY2X3xOPWZZzjyis5SNnfOcPH3gt2hYz1fy+thsBGf4NgCN01JRqIJ2/MOQCgU dwh+9l8xqaJvCkUHM4hVh4W62MAe1u7UEqQbvvNEqxM5034vcvlE+/LRkrDCspw+ 2YJ9QyroLerVRwW5DVleP8Ifi8VB3yD80nqXYs9aqRy0BkDNIQ43ERhESMt8dJqr NkxgC6pemZrhNwyDh+hy2kPNGQh/iBpdKuH1o3E24TIZoV2v3YHvzob7aAYHddE/ PofAXhJW7I9mAs+HdWDmnI8ckuPDFpFH+Y/BFGvEXgcnJAJ1wEvf+4LuiIi0MHjR 4EWFn9vvoFDAIqD10h3FSd3D59HGtdSsNn4XaCsAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQIACQUCUimU TAIbDAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZhBtEACL036ddjc5pFoYIdoUY1vT8SMXJNquewCnL1qu DADzqDZFU5GNlQEy10krSfBwlTb9ahTtE0JFrOdZwUZtoa1Pgfr8nU6KOgrXPHbN jS/9dyc5CwGVVIpOavIm2CsMVDJ9LCF/NT+u/t1k6eGfHhPVl3dUQyDa/lzc1chK UIVQYQkFmr0A/iXP+29lFCaI+IeyU0bSdZhezDwUROn5vEx+fiPZyHDShCb+BxJv /o2LQp9JHenCiSbO+ioRZdxgbWfoKBuXOfmSStqMWXas/gZ5vS3xq72LNtKPRxgp jX3P8Zml1XDqpcBau7eK75VKE0Yd06YxnUIsbcEzInUc3uzW/u0DFpXYkMJb0XIv JyUt5yYPKfV13N8kSkPi5pLxm8yuftXMzfgeFMR7nafY3glTVj/TxElzg6xeZNqf C2ZjIbBtZg9ylHU8u8wwB+dX282crs0R3N9A064C71/cXlBqcjzjlKH2NUIWGxr+ od3TXFIFjszSU3NgMPKrWNhFLLwS81MpbkOe73s6aDhS8RDyNucoxtKXriLR+4Xi u4+pyj5ukYP1JqpB3ZobY/XZgCnJMye+7xeTpIDJ1LPORxM3NNAElyb26lxAK2P+ km+EpI0Zzz6rNSCfg5jYQ474+e/GBgaSG4MlaPoZ+XAfN46u1Xjjv1/AkkA4IA6m 5zP5og=3D=3D =3D3NUt -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------080300040105070307070606-- --LquuqBKMMQLqhJLrHUXku33DggRfRnFWD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTY7JgAAoJEMDeajWKOdxmRH4QALRqAXCnWfxBZrjAB+RKOz4I MJSdMvKYcmdUgYAf5vXZCGYz6L/6zvYe9sz1P5/XJdH28EEvVg5G3iJarWyQIPmp TCcEhi3NJnll4RVoM1846GLVUXpRYO9063vuXh+gIeFPxH9ZWnHbdQvs9olqiHiZ 4mnDp0S7zqGQJLkFndETTu0VMzdiMPgc9/cFCFTkCfbo9miFHfjbSe5INQ4l9yNn Pcd/kxzImipWFijTFbkZkE0ZYaG/eob2+6W65NUmVIJLVeu73hmTrG4z4CuqzcaG 8uMV1GCvv95zl4sGMwFSsx4QqP0OmSzZWDch7oI7aG+5EeT2spSAsRCIrlCpuGgk ffpOj9MYdFxP3Rv12KA78E03stz0f2sX2crulsS14AOL4cfp3CAjdJhWL2bG0fqm l3uYqaqcxaujYSArPAyOf90wJbuW+h3kdmj/FxZ5igILvGOO95uGOqZYoVnZoOkP 4CEufOa3Ke5Kpxn5yzO9ZS3m6Lr2LWCiHHrs5F1WNqNJWkzUsLG9achh3cps1cZt bdsBnvOw+zyJdZfoOFzuYCMH/qmGTq9J/AjFTh/fmOqDCYKdBg5SQZNfA+s2bv1z F+nZ+WLxgu207mTgEvCRtNMWJmOoBUXK5SJenc+16dDbckr+/samqnYJXEn9oQZs /Ru3FwB5WDmnqFzTKeE+ =n3tQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LquuqBKMMQLqhJLrHUXku33DggRfRnFWD-- From nobody Fri May 2 18:09:25 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F5A1A7022 for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 18:09:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.851 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eXNVL3ztJyOe for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 18:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC241A701B for ; Fri, 2 May 2014 18:09:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BDT70881; Sat, 03 May 2014 01:09:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 3 May 2014 02:07:52 +0100 Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.212.94.47) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sat, 3 May 2014 02:09:15 +0100 Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.79]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.206]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 2 May 2014 18:09:12 -0700 From: Dean cheng To: Stefan Winter , "radext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [radext] Adoption of draft-cheng-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt ? Thread-Index: AQHPXvIpcLEndinJ3U2NJF2c1dP2o5ssdUtA Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 01:09:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5357B645.5050105@restena.lu> In-Reply-To: <5357B645.5050105@restena.lu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.212.244.16] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/xhXEnqRV_4EH0ZtOBzipL5rR6Ug Subject: Re: [radext] Adoption of draft-cheng-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt ? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 01:09:23 -0000 As a co-author, I support the adoption. Also, thanks Alan for his comments that we'll incorporate in the next revision. Dean > -----Original Message----- > From: radext [mailto:radext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stefan > Winter > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 5:47 AM > To: radext@ietf.org > Subject: [radext] Adoption of draft-cheng-radext-ip-port-radius-ext- > 00.txt ? >=20 > Hello, >=20 > as discussed recently, we believe radext is at a point where old items > are finished and new work can be added to our workload. >=20 > There was a good and positive discussion on what is now draft-cheng- > radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt in the London meeting. >=20 > BEHAVE (where this work could fit into) is not taking on new work. The > RADEXT charter already allows us to work on RADIUS extensions, so if > there is support for adoption of this work here in our WG, we can take > it on pretty much immediately. >=20 > So, this work needs a home and we could be that home if we want to. >=20 > This mail starts a two week call for adoption for this draft. Please > reply to this mail indicating whether you are in favour for adoption or > not. Since the discussions in London were of generic nature, and not > directly asking for adoption, there is no default - silence does not > count as acceptance. So don't be silent :-) >=20 > The call for adoption ends 7 May 2014. >=20 > Greetings, >=20 > Stefan Winter >=20 > -- > Stefan WINTER > Ingenieur de Recherche > Fondation RESTENA - R=E9seau T=E9l=E9informatique de l'Education National= e et > de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi > L-1359 Luxembourg >=20 > Tel: +352 424409 1 > Fax: +352 422473 >=20 > PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the > recipient's key is known to me >=20 > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 From nobody Sun May 4 00:21:55 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062311A0160 for ; Sun, 4 May 2014 00:21:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.552 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82s54nSjRVaK for ; Sun, 4 May 2014 00:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aspen.internal.iea-software.com (remote.iea-software.com [70.89.142.196]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144E21A00F9 for ; Sun, 4 May 2014 00:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SMURF.peterd.ws (unverified [10.0.3.195]) by aspen.internal.iea-software.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 7.0.6) with ESMTP id ; Sun, 4 May 2014 00:21:48 -0700 Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 00:21:53 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) From: Peter Deacon To: Stefan Winter In-Reply-To: <5357B645.5050105@restena.lu> Message-ID: References: <5357B645.5050105@restena.lu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (WNT 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; FORMAT=flowed Content-ID: Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/Wl0-WN4EvWzKd0PXop19jS8xZGQ Cc: "radext@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [radext] Adoption of draft-cheng-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt ? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 07:21:54 -0000 On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Stefan Winter wrote: > Hello, > as discussed recently, we believe radext is at a point where old items > are finished and new work can be added to our workload. > There was a good and positive discussion on what is now > draft-cheng-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt in the London meeting. > This mail starts a two week call for adoption for this draft. Please > reply to this mail indicating whether you are in favour for adoption or > not. Since the discussions in London were of generic nature, and not > directly asking for adoption, there is no default - silence does not > count as acceptance. So don't be silent :-) We are interested in the feature set and support adoption. Have a number of comments and questions about this draft. 1. Is section 5 table correct where a maximum of one instance of each container is allowed? There may be value in more than one to for example set IP-Port-Limit to configure independently per IP layer protocol or to allocate ports across multiple external addresses. If really limited to just one the TLV grouping can be collapsed into normal attributes. If multiple instances allowed during CoA for IP-Port-Range care may be needed to avoid ambiguities synchronizing change. -- 2. Recommend throughout draft having one attribute/TLV per data field replacing all instances where multiple fields are defined in any custom fixed formats. -- 3. Confused by definition of IP-Port-Type 3.1 Extended-Type seems to be allocating an attribute Id for each IP protocol. Recommend defining an attribute IP-Port-Type using value field of attribute to determine IP layer protocol(s) to be associated. Using IP-Port-Type as a container is problematic the way RFC6929 works attributes within each container are defined separately .. there is no pool of global attributes able to be reused short of very redundant redefinition. -- 4. Usage contradiction Section 1 "IP-Port-Range:This attribute may be carried in RADIUS Access- Accept, Accounting-Request or CoA-Request packet. " Section 3.3 " The IP-Port-Range MAY appear in an Accounting-Request packet. The IP-Port-Range MUST NOT appear in any other RADIUS packets." Section 5. 0 0 0 0 0-1 TBA IP-Port-Range Prefer option of having port ranges be configurable via Access-Accept/CoA. -- 5. Have had requests to have ability to configure NAT session limits. For example IP-NAT-Session-Limit (Proto=TCP,Limit=10000) limits session to 10000 concurrent TCP associations in NAT state table. This is essentially IP-Port-Limit except quantity of associations rather than ports... noting port limits do not translate to session limits as ports are per destination address. -- 6. Comments on internal and external addresses. IP-Port-Limit - Extended-Type (container) - IP Protocol (TCP,UDP,ICMP,TCP+UDP,TCP+UDP+ICMP,...) - TLV - Limit - TLV IP-Port-Range - Extended-Type (container) - IP Protocol - TLV - Range Start - TLV - Range End - TLV - External IP - TLV IP-Port-Forwarding-Map - Extended-Type (container) - IP Protocol - TLV - Internal Port - TLV - External Port - TLV - Internal IP - TLV With regards to IP-Port-Limit and IP-Port-Range on Access-Accept there should be parity in terms of opportunity to specify external address. IP-Port-Forwarding-Map would be helpful to include External IP such that external face of services mapped internally are configurable independently. (e.g. Customer wants to run a web site on port 80 on specific external IP) regards, Peter From nobody Tue May 6 02:23:32 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4A51A0299 for ; Tue, 6 May 2014 02:23:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0B9zFhsXjWCU for ; Tue, 6 May 2014 02:23:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEFF1A0157 for ; Tue, 6 May 2014 02:23:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id p9so2025581lbv.35 for ; Tue, 06 May 2014 02:23:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N0AOqzhLRPVs82/4GUKK0aO8jXvF3ut0LSATVycaTIc=; b=fvT2+86km7dIxov3FcX4w21pvo1AAaIeC6u253CTqk40Aj7eCQ8Tiy5tLxtWIjlHx1 bUHubDi1MdQg6QrykYfw0X36RfhE/7jrFw5Wks9tgm/jO0hHZ5mDwJfGtilsSNFu20Nq eeKjahTlG3zWqm+3n7SyDuz/Yu6SX8cga9c8mEmZZBcg0JEIReiZBH0M4NyUq9eZ7fZI GbvHaYKImUULqL493Kl49ngCo5JKBPIFTFnMOfd+902BAZ+bV+N3T9+0FVKy9LDieT5L xJ8jP07s5AsFYjahiu0e09JaEDsmG6tP39kLHUkQT7Ody+DrJE+rP8xQDI+5CWGvsZAs jESA== X-Received: by 10.112.139.166 with SMTP id qz6mr30397592lbb.13.1399368204843; Tue, 06 May 2014 02:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.17.0.22] ([83.150.126.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d8sm12798434lbe.3.2014.05.06.02.23.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 06 May 2014 02:23:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5368AA0A.401@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 12:23:22 +0300 From: Jouni Korhonen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radext@ietf.org References: <5357B645.5050105@restena.lu> In-Reply-To: <5357B645.5050105@restena.lu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/VVD3LJdj-sImD7TzFNAevpdb-yI Subject: Re: [radext] Adoption of draft-cheng-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt ? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 09:23:31 -0000 As n co-author I am in favor taking this I-D as a basis for the WG engineered solution. - Jouni 4/23/2014 3:47 PM, Stefan Winter kirjoitti: > Hello, > > as discussed recently, we believe radext is at a point where old items > are finished and new work can be added to our workload. > > There was a good and positive discussion on what is now > draft-cheng-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt in the London meeting. > > BEHAVE (where this work could fit into) is not taking on new work. The > RADEXT charter already allows us to work on RADIUS extensions, so if > there is support for adoption of this work here in our WG, we can take > it on pretty much immediately. > > So, this work needs a home and we could be that home if we want to. > > This mail starts a two week call for adoption for this draft. Please > reply to this mail indicating whether you are in favour for adoption or > not. Since the discussions in London were of generic nature, and not > directly asking for adoption, there is no default - silence does not > count as acceptance. So don't be silent :-) > > The call for adoption ends 7 May 2014. > > Greetings, > > Stefan Winter > > > > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext > From nobody Thu May 8 05:53:09 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D6B1A04B9 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 05:53:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.251 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_NAIL=2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k1sBQvuqT5wz for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 05:53:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA9A1A03DC for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 05:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52741 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WiNos-0000qs-AH; Thu, 08 May 2014 14:53:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 12:53:02 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/173 Message-ID: <065.7ee2e2cf3c36cf187a9d2190742ab3c4@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 173 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@freeradius.org Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/JwzRw20xNh5n0EevAOJcqkH_BsI Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #173 (nai): draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: nits X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 12:53:09 -0000 #173: draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: nits While preparing the PROTO writeup, I noticed some nits which might be worth fixing before continuing. 1) The document header states that this draft is from the "Network Working Group", while it should be "RADIUS Extensions Working Group" 2) Abstract line three misses an apostrophe ("identify each other's users" 3) Section 3 lacks a title 4) The normative reference [RFC5234] is also STD68, but the expanded reference does not mention that. For other references, this is done though, see [RFC3629]. This is probably a bug in the I-D generator tool; just wanted to note it so it isn't forgotten. 5) IDNITS: The abstract seems to contain references ([RFC4282]), which it shouldn't. Please replace those with straight textual mentions of the documents in question. 6) IDNITS: The document seems to use 'NOT RECOMMENDED' as an RFC 2119 keyword, but does not include the phrase in its RFC 2119 key words list. 7) IDNITS: Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 3588 (Obsoleted by RFC 6733) Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 5335 (Obsoleted by RFC 6532) Outdated reference: draft-iab-dns-zone-codepoint-pples has been published as RFC 6912 -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | nai@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: nai | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Keywords: Writeup | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Thu May 8 05:59:06 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799541A04B9 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 05:59:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.251 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_NAIL=2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9EfM6TtZl6Jd for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 05:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291C71A02B2 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 05:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52852 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WiNuc-0001ts-1n; Thu, 08 May 2014 14:58:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 12:58:58 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/174 Message-ID: <065.12d087d901705030bfcbbcad989fa5e8@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 174 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@freeradius.org Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/rohEzgC5N6SNFbp86SVaQ_xV1_8 Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #174 (nai): draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: IPR boilerplate X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 12:59:04 -0000 #174: draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: IPR boilerplate The document contains the pre-2008 disclaimer. It contains some text which was pulled in from earlier documents, but not much. Did the author ask the authors of the pulled-in text if they are willing to give more contemporary rights to the IETF Trust, thereby obsoleting the disclaimer? Depending on what is granted, replacing some inline text with a mention by-reference could lift the IPR disclaimer as well. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | nai@tools.ietf.org Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: nai | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Keywords: Writeup | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Thu May 8 06:08:06 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3521A02B2 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 06:08:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.251 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_NAIL=2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTvqbzq58yLw for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 06:08:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D54B1A02A1 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 06:08:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53087 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WiO3I-0004dc-Gp; Thu, 08 May 2014 15:07:56 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 13:07:56 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/175 Message-ID: <065.274438d4aeae4f9a94f3d1ee792506f3@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 175 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@freeradius.org Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/0nG-27BctQ_Wp2-XO29xhzW7GGQ Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #175 (nai): draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: IANA considerations X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 13:08:02 -0000 #175: draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: IANA considerations The document contains a section on IANA considerations, but after reading it twice now * it does not seem to have any action for IANA * but doesn't state that The text in there comes from the original RFC4282 and is somewhat valuable, but it might make sense for the section to be renamed in order not trigger questions by IANA. The remaining IANA considerations section could then simply state "This document has no actions for IANA." -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | nai@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: nai | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Keywords: Writeup | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Thu May 8 06:16:17 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4A51A02B2 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 06:16:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.251 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_NAIL=2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2WcSYHwEEfLO for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 06:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271B91A0227 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 06:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53347 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WiOBF-0000eh-41; Thu, 08 May 2014 15:16:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 13:16:08 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/176 Message-ID: <065.18ebd81ae64d013f63a780221f34a543@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 176 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@freeradius.org Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/7xVij-Q8C_7wSiCo1mEXvESzZPY Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #176 (nai): draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: is the term *Network Access* Identifier still appropriate? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 13:16:15 -0000 #176: draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: is the term *Network Access* Identifier still appropriate? The document takes two conflicting positions on NAIs. In some places, it claims that the identifiers defined in this document are of generic use, particularly beyond network access scenarios (e.g. in Introduction, para 3 and 4; and section 1.3, third para). The document title itself (still) scopes the identifiers as "Network Access Identifier"; also the definition of the term in section 1.1 explicitly speaks about "network access authentication". The document could be more consistent; if one is to follow the argument that such identifiers are for use beyond network authentication, then it is much more logical to reflect this in the name of the identifier, and in its definition. I don't recall this aspect already having been discussed on the mailing list; my apologies if my memory fails me. If it was indeed not discussed, I think this is worth bringing up. As an individual, my opinion is that a name notion of "Unique User Identifier" (or maybe s/User/Entity since it's not necessarily a human) would make more sense; "Unique" because the binding to FQDNs makes it somewhat (albeit not absolutely) unique. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | nai@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: nai | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Keywords: Writeup | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Thu May 8 06:18:52 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38DC1A02BC for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 06:18:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.651 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id trQxuuGpjNpi for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 06:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EE51A02B2 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 06:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6877D1057F for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 15:18:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 568C910583 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 15:18:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <536B8433.5090906@restena.lu> Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 15:18:43 +0200 From: Stefan Winter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radext@ietf.org References: <53314B6B.1060403@restena.lu> In-Reply-To: <53314B6B.1060403@restena.lu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lonBeh9VSM12OOwUwpw20uwoN0k4rXGTn" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/q6PTn9Y10qE3m1eII4Y10NujHpc Subject: Re: [radext] Nits for draft-ietf-radext-nai-05 X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 13:18:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --lonBeh9VSM12OOwUwpw20uwoN0k4rXGTn Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060800050601040007030207" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060800050601040007030207 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, > I've submitted them to TRAC grouped into separate classes of comments. And now, only 6 weeks later, they have arrived :-) I think some of the comments deserve a new -06 version before we continue with the PROTO writeup. Greetings, Stefan Winter --=20 Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - R=E9seau T=E9l=E9informatique de l'Education National= e et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473 PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 --------------060800050601040007030207 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="0x8A39DC66.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0x8A39DC66.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) mQINBFIplEwBEADTSz+DS8nio+RSvfSLLfaOnCGi1nqpn8Pb1laVUyEvnAAzZ5je miS88GxfiDH6hUGlWzcaW0hCfUHGiohr485adbjxRksPngWgAt/1bRxpifsW3zOb Fjgog01WWQV5Sihlwc4zr8zvYbFA5BJZ6YdkR9C5J015riv5OS30WTjA65SSXgYr b7zJWPwmegTFwE093uBFvC39waz3xYpVu5j87nO6w2MVQt/8sY2/2BFPEq+xfOaj l18UEwc7w8SCgnZdlVNcmEK4UBvJuwS/1lsR2JeQa8Gu1EDxC7PRgMgNXsDSWnnB e9aVmfG54+6ILe1QH2dwk9sPBQT5w2+vjijrb3Dv9ur+1kN+TNU2XE436jVpnnY/ 3OsLdix30STQn4Q/XOm7YoVMeDwwviefilRxzK0dXA+wKj92T68Od82CFxuZqPAg BCVmWfQM91iK9piqFK+QP+R3vF6+NGDBdwbe68iVKs0v5L8XmbxBQndjpmo+lo2a smBR2TAIfZHaKdgtBw13u3GPVVKlg/Mpko8ki9JOSem2aFyi3kQEVKptWgXT3POl 97DWJzsR5VyKz6GOx9kJAEISRyLZwm0wqh8+9LCza5oeIKW381lzq1b9x30vOh8C BSQQJ+cG9ko0yPHAj7Suw2TmPXx1qMctmE6Ahq82ZW30SljdZby8WQuR2wARAQAB tDxTdGVmYW4gV2ludGVyIChSRVNURU5BIGtleSAyMDEzKykgPHN0ZWZhbi53aW50 ZXJAcmVzdGVuYS5sdT6JAjkEEwECACMFAlIplEwCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZj7/D/99hVS+mJr8dSPCaDaUFFxBiT2eI1Lo R8VKEerTCRw5BsdL6pN2eRJZ9NmsqWo1ynWVHEzO91bNZ+oZGgyoNohcBAI7p+r0 qUTzkyqwdZO4kMm0pqKoM9xkP3tf2mjGujKjOz4Y7S7wnz2ZFokeUsecoRVJF/++ /qHnmeWLn44J1HUKLHYCjMu+QXGOgGXgz024jQ5eUrnPwzNp0Z90AFVHlWC+bymt y/ToIUUCQqS5Ff0jzdWLd8U695OG9iGvjBQT1LdEjsfbAwuKV5UcnpxNqUpUwKa5 9hdX5/2cMZP07FI1UXwnBlxa8rJfdb13FLjSKX4vUUHedYUZMjMPgcwl1a+zGE22 lHiSQWgP8QLA/W3BLsi22ERCEPZBfexOeOtaWIItDIz18fIaQoMDoRPshzar0JI2 CzLYsyeKySAtYJEHFVoLmMvhkwzBmgqA/BEswUA67CfCr1jFHRXdpmWM7YkyAmMa 9q6LwquWKS5+MXlUXe/3oZUcgpw/T9Uuy3Jo3RdS7B3jFcWaVr6KsO/A9u1gr/aY n5M+iJTQSj4vzqtkQaJTpSspRZoKa66HZt3IwSYiDiYZqtM83ynuj9kjnZzGfnuT aNIi996q6Mptr33mOzIE1wmMqnJYwTr3EcNtf483q/qrJwh5ES8Q9xY7aat/ZcSl 8fKubW4TlfVr8YhGBBARAgAGBQJSKZUGAAoJEPo5vdH/HhVmYTgAn24eoqO/O98o vNpt08Uab/+/tmYKAJ9kjXm9Njz5h33efzeelZUa484rr7kCDQRSKZRMARAAvBPp n7FQq7LQ5glohtbL6XIEo1U4X67S0TzUYieENSWSVYuWYIhCBldmWdmH8Bpj/qHe qdon7v+SLtR4WngzMR9toupKcFfHnbP9kpazTSB2ySHxXWGX1gJOpPXdCcg9iveK BHEsDn00ThTcPsvtXpnnzET16pXIvOXO0bxTmVZ4INIF1SWgvYma/g8kBbgXLpkj 8tOywBqFiiYPEZlDeCxDHiMgUDh6olda9K/0TZFTdMPUgjKuubfAeaDNCOrVt4Rj mFOaRLikcZocmgJhm3z/j25x7/mnNu+0di1H/S67YGQJ+pqCFInzIXDx7aRW2+JC iqsY2X3xOPWZZzjyis5SNnfOcPH3gt2hYz1fy+thsBGf4NgCN01JRqIJ2/MOQCgU dwh+9l8xqaJvCkUHM4hVh4W62MAe1u7UEqQbvvNEqxM5034vcvlE+/LRkrDCspw+ 2YJ9QyroLerVRwW5DVleP8Ifi8VB3yD80nqXYs9aqRy0BkDNIQ43ERhESMt8dJqr NkxgC6pemZrhNwyDh+hy2kPNGQh/iBpdKuH1o3E24TIZoV2v3YHvzob7aAYHddE/ PofAXhJW7I9mAs+HdWDmnI8ckuPDFpFH+Y/BFGvEXgcnJAJ1wEvf+4LuiIi0MHjR 4EWFn9vvoFDAIqD10h3FSd3D59HGtdSsNn4XaCsAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQIACQUCUimU TAIbDAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZhBtEACL036ddjc5pFoYIdoUY1vT8SMXJNquewCnL1qu DADzqDZFU5GNlQEy10krSfBwlTb9ahTtE0JFrOdZwUZtoa1Pgfr8nU6KOgrXPHbN jS/9dyc5CwGVVIpOavIm2CsMVDJ9LCF/NT+u/t1k6eGfHhPVl3dUQyDa/lzc1chK UIVQYQkFmr0A/iXP+29lFCaI+IeyU0bSdZhezDwUROn5vEx+fiPZyHDShCb+BxJv /o2LQp9JHenCiSbO+ioRZdxgbWfoKBuXOfmSStqMWXas/gZ5vS3xq72LNtKPRxgp jX3P8Zml1XDqpcBau7eK75VKE0Yd06YxnUIsbcEzInUc3uzW/u0DFpXYkMJb0XIv JyUt5yYPKfV13N8kSkPi5pLxm8yuftXMzfgeFMR7nafY3glTVj/TxElzg6xeZNqf C2ZjIbBtZg9ylHU8u8wwB+dX282crs0R3N9A064C71/cXlBqcjzjlKH2NUIWGxr+ od3TXFIFjszSU3NgMPKrWNhFLLwS81MpbkOe73s6aDhS8RDyNucoxtKXriLR+4Xi u4+pyj5ukYP1JqpB3ZobY/XZgCnJMye+7xeTpIDJ1LPORxM3NNAElyb26lxAK2P+ km+EpI0Zzz6rNSCfg5jYQ474+e/GBgaSG4MlaPoZ+XAfN46u1Xjjv1/AkkA4IA6m 5zP5og=3D=3D =3D3NUt -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------060800050601040007030207-- --lonBeh9VSM12OOwUwpw20uwoN0k4rXGTn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTa4QzAAoJEMDeajWKOdxmJp0P/2L6WPoGTOyjI3YMzQuLvujY laWPzEHi9r30MJaaR4bbwgP61h+hOwKLfVVrGONLo2UL2w8JBIlzjwMDdJtZOuQ0 SsHdKsJCeNKT7/qJs3nA26GKfzz7PkK0a7ZAZ9r9j9V8v6/SR948ZUUegKQYpfH5 fH6wrXGniBMk2dBG7JzxGhcXaiqNuU41P6sNICEARtYPriER70zgILES84rFHInY pZVBuE9ooFG8/jCk9yQVAgp8mgYDNILNzgEWFZ9t5t9NYrQ/wddD73NxHLKusiz7 7bBLcuf3vLverH1KKgKAjMkCGRwymA/ENVuf/BQEuU2xboXzpyfqX60Y+hdzt8Np Qu7X9e8Z0pQqSrax5x6xigncXWtpP1CFjey8TldhMz1dAZM2xKfL61gEE0PCuEBD Dscq3ZslpUZskjHggPEB/j5tSE3CyZtHVm9XwLRhCt8hLaMt76fllFCIXng5aP6C kaeSoFYM5ucImf/cm+5DH2/oH03VpvZnbGaVw4UKwoOF9w4iS7rxlcFm0pXYIiGb 4Az/6y509ymGjTVmQqLQ138J9xTRoGH3UCmH55yf18OBvK0UARp6T3v7JXgXc81q 8YngdAAZElWqCV0QfGawQWI41nf3gLgl59Kbd/SqThrCbXetybx8maRwwKPjiWiQ FVsiE2u88jEnFV4iXkjb =Ht+e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lonBeh9VSM12OOwUwpw20uwoN0k4rXGTn-- From nobody Thu May 8 13:28:46 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3221A013E; Thu, 8 May 2014 13:28:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0L0LGUFRR2pH; Thu, 8 May 2014 13:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93981A0123; Thu, 8 May 2014 13:28:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.4.2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140508202840.5016.68106.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 13:28:40 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/MfoeUJzZv3rQW9_b04ck5kK0dp8 Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-dtls-12.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 20:28:42 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : DTLS as a Transport Layer for RADIUS Author : Alan DeKok Filename : draft-ietf-radext-dtls-12.txt Pages : 27 Date : 2014-05-08 Abstract: The RADIUS protocol defined in RFC 2865 has limited support for authentication and encryption of RADIUS packets. The protocol transports data in the clear, although some parts of the packets can have obfuscated content. Packets may be replayed verbatim by an attacker, and client-server authentication is based on fixed shared secrets. This document specifies how the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol may be used as a fix for these problems. It also describes how implementations of this proposal can co-exist with current RADIUS systems. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-dtls/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-dtls-12 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-radext-dtls-12 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri May 9 07:07:37 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1DD1A02A4 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 07:07:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.151 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZrrZrWRNvsAi for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 07:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68701A02C6 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 07:07:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=25445; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1399644427; x=1400854027; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; bh=r0Ajbzo2BiGhykVE0EiSHyNixbRGWP4dbI00LWKTjmM=; b=hRndRr+YAeeH/NPU628sR0Yk7/iMKUGhtFbi2Ejn2iCLIjLDScPXF+oO x/f/0AmIf6atJPMk179GwnqdmiHbyEbohqg3Hj2rPwRbJ04I9L0Nx8XIU E6Ja0cj4jZErjzhGGJgqlD45nz9XLHsemdXz3eXeXu5lHZ+n8yNKiSPBW Q=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AisFANXgbFOtJA2M/2dsb2JhbABZgkJET75kAYZqUQGBFxZ0giYBAQQBAQEaEEEKEQshFgEBDQkDAgECARUwBgEMBgIBAYg9DdEiEwSNfgMBAVaEQASKDo85hmWMHYNUH4E5 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,1018,1389744000"; d="scan'208,217";a="42472251" Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 May 2014 14:07:06 +0000 Received: from [10.82.211.196] (rtp-vpn4-964.cisco.com [10.82.211.196]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s49E75hq025477; Fri, 9 May 2014 14:07:05 GMT Message-ID: <536CE108.9030901@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 09:07:04 -0500 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Winter , "radext@ietf.org" References: <5357B645.5050105@restena.lu> In-Reply-To: <5357B645.5050105@restena.lu> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050403040702020002070904" Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/MihT09jdRajbOOml8aRcXu2o5KI Subject: Re: [radext] Adoption of draft-cheng-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt ? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 14:07:15 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050403040702020002070904 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Stefan, Not that much replies on the mailing list, but my own meeting minutes tell me: Who read this draft: 5 Who is interested in this work: 8 So it seems like a good one to adopt. Regards, Benoit > Hello, > > as discussed recently, we believe radext is at a point where old items > are finished and new work can be added to our workload. > > There was a good and positive discussion on what is now > draft-cheng-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt in the London meeting. > > BEHAVE (where this work could fit into) is not taking on new work. The > RADEXT charter already allows us to work on RADIUS extensions, so if > there is support for adoption of this work here in our WG, we can take > it on pretty much immediately. > > So, this work needs a home and we could be that home if we want to. > > This mail starts a two week call for adoption for this draft. Please > reply to this mail indicating whether you are in favour for adoption or > not. Since the discussions in London were of generic nature, and not > directly asking for adoption, there is no default - silence does not > count as acceptance. So don't be silent :-) > > The call for adoption ends 7 May 2014. > > Greetings, > > Stefan Winter > > > > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext --------------050403040702020002070904 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Stefan,

Not that much replies on the mailing list, but my own meeting minutes tell me:

Who     read this draft: 5

Who     is interested in this work: 8


So it seems like a good one to adopt.

Regards, Benoit
Hello,

as discussed recently, we believe radext is at a point where old items
are finished and new work can be added to our workload.

There was a good and positive discussion on what is now
draft-cheng-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt in the London meeting.

BEHAVE (where this work could fit into) is not taking on new work. The
RADEXT charter already allows us to work on RADIUS extensions, so if
there is support for adoption of this work here in our WG, we can take
it on pretty much immediately.

So, this work needs a home and we could be that home if we want to.

This mail starts a two week call for adoption for this draft. Please
reply to this mail indicating whether you are in favour for adoption or
not. Since the discussions in London were of generic nature, and not
directly asking for adoption, there is no default - silence does not
count as acceptance. So don't be silent :-)

The call for adoption ends 7 May 2014.

Greetings,

Stefan Winter




_______________________________________________
radext mailing list
radext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext

--------------050403040702020002070904-- From nobody Fri May 9 07:25:46 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7B61A02A3 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 07:25:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45fI-GQq8AKe for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 07:25:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4786C1A02B3 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 07:25:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF65010581 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 16:25:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A34A51057F for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 16:25:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <536CE551.2050003@restena.lu> Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 16:25:21 +0200 From: Stefan Winter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radext@ietf.org References: <5357B645.5050105@restena.lu> In-Reply-To: <5357B645.5050105@restena.lu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SPiD0uNspj5RuMq9r2O8U80q3d3vnnDo4" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/WgsuAb29K9vXj8uRAPChn4lr7eY Subject: Re: [radext] Adoption of draft-cheng-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt ? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 14:25:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --SPiD0uNspj5RuMq9r2O8U80q3d3vnnDo4 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070401050907080005080000" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070401050907080005080000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, > This mail starts a two week call for adoption for this draft. Please > reply to this mail indicating whether you are in favour for adoption or= > not. Since the discussions in London were of generic nature, and not > directly asking for adoption, there is no default - silence does not > count as acceptance. So don't be silent :-) >=20 > The call for adoption ends 7 May 2014. The 7th of May is now history in all timezones on the planet, so the call for adoption is now closed. Of all the four people that responded (2 of which were co-authors), all were in favour of adoption; plus more support in the room, as Benoit's mail clarifies. This looks like unanimous support for adoption of the document! This document will now become a chartered work item. Authors, please re-submit this document as draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00. =46rom the comments during the adoption call, I understand that there is still plenty to discuss and refine. I will tentatively reserve 10 minutes on the IETF90 agenda on that topic. Greetings, Stefan Winter --=20 Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - R=E9seau T=E9l=E9informatique de l'Education National= e et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473 PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 --------------070401050907080005080000 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="0x8A39DC66.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0x8A39DC66.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) mQINBFIplEwBEADTSz+DS8nio+RSvfSLLfaOnCGi1nqpn8Pb1laVUyEvnAAzZ5je miS88GxfiDH6hUGlWzcaW0hCfUHGiohr485adbjxRksPngWgAt/1bRxpifsW3zOb Fjgog01WWQV5Sihlwc4zr8zvYbFA5BJZ6YdkR9C5J015riv5OS30WTjA65SSXgYr b7zJWPwmegTFwE093uBFvC39waz3xYpVu5j87nO6w2MVQt/8sY2/2BFPEq+xfOaj l18UEwc7w8SCgnZdlVNcmEK4UBvJuwS/1lsR2JeQa8Gu1EDxC7PRgMgNXsDSWnnB e9aVmfG54+6ILe1QH2dwk9sPBQT5w2+vjijrb3Dv9ur+1kN+TNU2XE436jVpnnY/ 3OsLdix30STQn4Q/XOm7YoVMeDwwviefilRxzK0dXA+wKj92T68Od82CFxuZqPAg BCVmWfQM91iK9piqFK+QP+R3vF6+NGDBdwbe68iVKs0v5L8XmbxBQndjpmo+lo2a smBR2TAIfZHaKdgtBw13u3GPVVKlg/Mpko8ki9JOSem2aFyi3kQEVKptWgXT3POl 97DWJzsR5VyKz6GOx9kJAEISRyLZwm0wqh8+9LCza5oeIKW381lzq1b9x30vOh8C BSQQJ+cG9ko0yPHAj7Suw2TmPXx1qMctmE6Ahq82ZW30SljdZby8WQuR2wARAQAB tDxTdGVmYW4gV2ludGVyIChSRVNURU5BIGtleSAyMDEzKykgPHN0ZWZhbi53aW50 ZXJAcmVzdGVuYS5sdT6JAjkEEwECACMFAlIplEwCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZj7/D/99hVS+mJr8dSPCaDaUFFxBiT2eI1Lo R8VKEerTCRw5BsdL6pN2eRJZ9NmsqWo1ynWVHEzO91bNZ+oZGgyoNohcBAI7p+r0 qUTzkyqwdZO4kMm0pqKoM9xkP3tf2mjGujKjOz4Y7S7wnz2ZFokeUsecoRVJF/++ /qHnmeWLn44J1HUKLHYCjMu+QXGOgGXgz024jQ5eUrnPwzNp0Z90AFVHlWC+bymt y/ToIUUCQqS5Ff0jzdWLd8U695OG9iGvjBQT1LdEjsfbAwuKV5UcnpxNqUpUwKa5 9hdX5/2cMZP07FI1UXwnBlxa8rJfdb13FLjSKX4vUUHedYUZMjMPgcwl1a+zGE22 lHiSQWgP8QLA/W3BLsi22ERCEPZBfexOeOtaWIItDIz18fIaQoMDoRPshzar0JI2 CzLYsyeKySAtYJEHFVoLmMvhkwzBmgqA/BEswUA67CfCr1jFHRXdpmWM7YkyAmMa 9q6LwquWKS5+MXlUXe/3oZUcgpw/T9Uuy3Jo3RdS7B3jFcWaVr6KsO/A9u1gr/aY n5M+iJTQSj4vzqtkQaJTpSspRZoKa66HZt3IwSYiDiYZqtM83ynuj9kjnZzGfnuT aNIi996q6Mptr33mOzIE1wmMqnJYwTr3EcNtf483q/qrJwh5ES8Q9xY7aat/ZcSl 8fKubW4TlfVr8YhGBBARAgAGBQJSKZUGAAoJEPo5vdH/HhVmYTgAn24eoqO/O98o vNpt08Uab/+/tmYKAJ9kjXm9Njz5h33efzeelZUa484rr7kCDQRSKZRMARAAvBPp n7FQq7LQ5glohtbL6XIEo1U4X67S0TzUYieENSWSVYuWYIhCBldmWdmH8Bpj/qHe qdon7v+SLtR4WngzMR9toupKcFfHnbP9kpazTSB2ySHxXWGX1gJOpPXdCcg9iveK BHEsDn00ThTcPsvtXpnnzET16pXIvOXO0bxTmVZ4INIF1SWgvYma/g8kBbgXLpkj 8tOywBqFiiYPEZlDeCxDHiMgUDh6olda9K/0TZFTdMPUgjKuubfAeaDNCOrVt4Rj mFOaRLikcZocmgJhm3z/j25x7/mnNu+0di1H/S67YGQJ+pqCFInzIXDx7aRW2+JC iqsY2X3xOPWZZzjyis5SNnfOcPH3gt2hYz1fy+thsBGf4NgCN01JRqIJ2/MOQCgU dwh+9l8xqaJvCkUHM4hVh4W62MAe1u7UEqQbvvNEqxM5034vcvlE+/LRkrDCspw+ 2YJ9QyroLerVRwW5DVleP8Ifi8VB3yD80nqXYs9aqRy0BkDNIQ43ERhESMt8dJqr NkxgC6pemZrhNwyDh+hy2kPNGQh/iBpdKuH1o3E24TIZoV2v3YHvzob7aAYHddE/ PofAXhJW7I9mAs+HdWDmnI8ckuPDFpFH+Y/BFGvEXgcnJAJ1wEvf+4LuiIi0MHjR 4EWFn9vvoFDAIqD10h3FSd3D59HGtdSsNn4XaCsAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQIACQUCUimU TAIbDAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZhBtEACL036ddjc5pFoYIdoUY1vT8SMXJNquewCnL1qu DADzqDZFU5GNlQEy10krSfBwlTb9ahTtE0JFrOdZwUZtoa1Pgfr8nU6KOgrXPHbN jS/9dyc5CwGVVIpOavIm2CsMVDJ9LCF/NT+u/t1k6eGfHhPVl3dUQyDa/lzc1chK UIVQYQkFmr0A/iXP+29lFCaI+IeyU0bSdZhezDwUROn5vEx+fiPZyHDShCb+BxJv /o2LQp9JHenCiSbO+ioRZdxgbWfoKBuXOfmSStqMWXas/gZ5vS3xq72LNtKPRxgp jX3P8Zml1XDqpcBau7eK75VKE0Yd06YxnUIsbcEzInUc3uzW/u0DFpXYkMJb0XIv JyUt5yYPKfV13N8kSkPi5pLxm8yuftXMzfgeFMR7nafY3glTVj/TxElzg6xeZNqf C2ZjIbBtZg9ylHU8u8wwB+dX282crs0R3N9A064C71/cXlBqcjzjlKH2NUIWGxr+ od3TXFIFjszSU3NgMPKrWNhFLLwS81MpbkOe73s6aDhS8RDyNucoxtKXriLR+4Xi u4+pyj5ukYP1JqpB3ZobY/XZgCnJMye+7xeTpIDJ1LPORxM3NNAElyb26lxAK2P+ km+EpI0Zzz6rNSCfg5jYQ474+e/GBgaSG4MlaPoZ+XAfN46u1Xjjv1/AkkA4IA6m 5zP5og=3D=3D =3D3NUt -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------070401050907080005080000-- --SPiD0uNspj5RuMq9r2O8U80q3d3vnnDo4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTbOVRAAoJEMDeajWKOdxmQmkP/0t/wjG9L4oVnHF005ZulSmD 7pxsLMSuCekMVoht+KCuIhKEL0UPaKbXyOajgLw3EUXKnW46pOxK6aCCNGWJsdUq a9sdlqqrJXfCjZoL6U5svjamrkoX2fjG+h6IbHRIHDlQeWKQJ9X8gAf+wcNHw2za T+ync1MngvPt5L7D9y6qZ7Ltbv/7+spF+xi8QPiS9R6FeOjw998Ulj1mnWj80AW0 5rA4Nn1yd8cOdKSpotTEeuIbzSSlXYtNZ/g4JwLRPmtU81GqoFJ/jeQfNuzaysSE i8TMXSij2CZkiathEULTTz77/TmogoTUhlqJ8rS9SWkJARL9CNV3yTMfJhcI88ns LTGWTfCTShQIV53KfyDv9iLXRMJm01p0ZWnzUD4+kQk8EreyN6RX1nDVQaouOmNu WaFQEoHcphNYBe5BGG6cdiOXQs2cA/0gRV8ryQyEU9SFkRkItnaOPPw0LQNUqPYR HhR5nsCXpSbHId2XcfegvgZ5j9kM4Ae3Tzo4+WqTie7ucTx/HDhgbcy9bUyCJnxF NJcUIK0MzuUtMR5n1kTNOJCeDYAl8+n3DjIrRa4u93wXPWmLgZvtjqndpibOU9Ov mTRTI+pUiTRchjoNAEpJVRSufjPmxaIBkXZc0nv7bnSDFX8UZ6ZlPVwYwif/F3Nm 0UZY706qY0mlO3RPL8Ud =iH9p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SPiD0uNspj5RuMq9r2O8U80q3d3vnnDo4-- From nobody Fri May 9 23:20:08 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1901A01A7; Fri, 9 May 2014 23:19:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1b15uKGhaA5I; Fri, 9 May 2014 23:19:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25DF1A019E; Fri, 9 May 2014 23:19:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.4.2.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140510061954.991.69851.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 23:19:54 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/B1VEgio4xqgcdLw3Qk_iDGJo3oY Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 06:19:57 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting Authors : Dean Cheng Jouni Korhonen Mohamed Boucadair Senthil Sivakumar Filename : draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00.txt Pages : 24 Date : 2014-05-09 Abstract: This document defines three new RADIUS attributes. For device that implementing IP port ranges, these attributes are used to communicate with a RADIUS server in order to configure and report TCP/UDP ports and ICMP identifiers, as well as mapping behavior for specific hosts. This mechanism can be used in various deployment scenarios such as CGN, NAT64, Provider WiFi Gateway, etc. This document does not make any assumption about the deployment context. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sat May 17 15:25:23 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03AC1A0119 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 15:25:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fyO9TMsmy7fI for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 15:25:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x232.google.com (mail-la0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B48E1A0240 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 15:25:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id b8so2959888lan.23 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 15:25:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=R/JD0ZTkTbiX6Zn31Zbr6/oS809N0FnloAiw8e/hEo8=; b=W+XEXWSrmScFQFEQCjjsRYuNgK49riy42EpehcHuuFlIcM0w/NPo9kHArRFnwIMmAv MdHeqbzyqMD0m4w/KPEGllD+dAytosYEqSykRYelCCoGluLterJG3ISgPC8jgaa5v55E OC5fTCBrH+ukiQD0gwQy3XIb/BCijdpHg4EAf3PN55Zh5XDMgS5Lt2le5qtFC3PQB3oR D/9pgJscIR/P6D4KFZbD2ZI6sDojI0cHRV5Sc563zOe8KQDvz1udWKPR+wqOWMCQ2sy/ zv4kIedzDMRuBTYMX/t2KHSYjP4eL6M7K4PTVQWxXmj05mk6Y1lkhYjuO8tKaxirMPu0 gYUw== X-Received: by 10.152.2.2 with SMTP id 2mr18920195laq.26.1400365506788; Sat, 17 May 2014 15:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.17.0.22] ([83.150.126.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jq6sm6671954lab.2.2014.05.17.15.25.05 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 17 May 2014 15:25:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5377E1C0.1090801@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 01:25:04 +0300 From: Jouni Korhonen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radext@ietf.org References: <8770.1400250056@sandelman.ca> In-Reply-To: <8770.1400250056@sandelman.ca> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <8770.1400250056@sandelman.ca> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020405060800000406060009" Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/igS9_geY56Gpfxv9EvYSYAnOld8 Subject: [radext] Fwd: NomCom 2014-2015 Call for Volunteers X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 22:25:18 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020405060800000406060009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit FYI -------- Alkuperäinen viesti / Orig.Msg. -------- Aihe: NomCom 2014-2015 Call for Volunteers Päiväys: Fri, 16 May 2014 10:20:56 -0400 Lähettäjä: Michael Richardson Vastausosoite: mcr+nomcom@sandelman.ca Vastaanottaja: ietf@ietf.org The IETF nominating committee (nomcom) process for 2014-15 has begun. The IETF nomcom appoints folks to fill the open slots on the IAOC, the IAB, and the IESG (including IETF Chair). Ten voting members for the nomcom are selected in a verifiably random way from a pool of volunteers. The more volunteers, the better chance we have of choosing a random yet representative cross section of the IETF population. Let's break the 200 volunteer mark again this year! The details of the operation of the nomcom can be found in RFC 3777, and BCP10/RFC3797 details the selection algorithm. Volunteers must have attended 3 of the past 5 IETF meetings. As specified in RFC 3777, that means three out of the five past meetings up to the time this email announcement goes out to start the solicitation of volunteers. The five meetings out of which you must have attended *three* are IETF 85(Atlanta), \ 86(Orlando), \ 87(Berlin), *** ANY THREE! 88(Vancouver), / 89(London) / If you qualify, please volunteer. However, much as we want this, before you decide to volunteer, please be sure you are willing to forgo appointment to any of the positions for which this nomcom is responsible. The list of people and posts whose terms end with the March 2015 IETF meeting, and thus the positions for which this nomcom is responsible, are IAOC: To be confirmed IAB: Joel Halpern Russ Housley Eliot Lear Xing Li Andrew Sullivan Dave Thaler IESG: Pete Resnick (Applications) Ted Lemon (Internet) Joel Jaeggli (Operations and Management) Richard Barnes (RAI) Adrian Farrel* (Routing) Stephen Farrell (Security) Spencer Dawkins (Transport) Jari Arkko (Gen) (names with * have publically indicated they will not serve another term) The primary activity for this nomcom will begin in July 2014 and should be completed in January 2015. The nomcom will have regularly scheduled conference calls to ensure progress. (We might dogfood WebRTC) There will be activities to collect requirements from the community, review candidate questionnaires, review feedback from community members about candidates, and talk to candidates. Thus, being a nomcom member does require some time commitment; but it is also a very rewarding experience. It is very important that you be able to attend IETF91 to conduct interviews. Being at IETF90 is useful for training. Being at IETF92 is not essential. Please volunteer by sending me an email before 11:59 pm EDT (UTC -4 hours) June 22, 2013, as follows: To: nomcom-chair-2014@ietf.org Subject: Nomcom 2014-15 Volunteer Please include the following information in the email body: // First/Given Name followed by Last/Family Name // matching how you enter it in the IETF Registration Form) // Typically what goes in the Company field // in the IETF Registration Form [] // For confirmation if selected You should expect an email response from me within 3 business days stating whether or not you are qualified. If you don't receive this response, please re-send your email with the tag "RESEND"" added to the subject line. If you are not yet sure if you would like to volunteer, please consider that nomcom members play a very important role in shaping the leadership of the IETF. Questions by email or voice are welcome. Volunteering for the nomcom is a great way to contribute to the IETF! You can find a detailed timeline on the nomcom web site at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/2014/ I will be publishing a more detailed target timetable, as well as details of the randomness seeds to be used for the RFC 3797 selection process, within the next couple weeks. Thank you! Michael Richardson mcr+nomcom@sandelman.ca nomcom-chair-2014@ietf.org --------------020405060800000406060009 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="Liitetty viestin osa" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Liitetty viestin osa" LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0NClZlcnNpb246IEdudVBHIHYxLjQuMTIg KEdOVS9MaW51eCkNCg0KaVFFVkF3VUJVM1lleDRDTGNQdmQwTjFsQVFMYVVRZ0FwbUt6elh4 Tk55aFhvcDY1VkxaVnFjL3dKL1BBY0xvcw0KWTBlY1lneFY5SHJ3UGF6QkdaMDU0M0NPTGkv Zm15M3dIMVhqY1QwK3VqSnRkcmZGMTZxODNMSStucEVvclV1MA0KS3lYclAwOVM2bWhlRkF6 Q3VkUk1tQ1UzektIUzdqK3FxNEFHMGhFeUo0Q0pUVnhiMEl5MEpDMzVTaDcxRW5kVA0Kb0R2 T29oRXVUbHAwdnFrZUg3LzNPVnRDekxmcnZoRXFKMDNNWERYZ1BGaE8vb2JDTk9EM3cxdC9u TWZBOGhjcg0KUGxQOVBGQVl0dEdWMWtBLzEvTllhM1NYUDljdUo3NjJMb2NGNDFoaUhsMU5Y dkVYdXZjYVZIV3dtWUlqQ05aVw0KYzR5SkV3bkhkcWUreFVKTFlZUHhvY0ZwT0dWTENuOE4w djExaGt1bmVFS0QvdWVkMEV0ZzV3PT0NCj1CZlY5DQotLS0tLUVORCBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJF LS0tLS0NCg== --------------020405060800000406060009-- From nobody Fri May 30 05:11:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 193231A09DF for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 05:11:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.15 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oikZSXkrlQdu for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 05:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB3B1A089F for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 05:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03A41058B for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:10:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2B961058A for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:10:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5388754B.101@restena.lu> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:10:51 +0200 From: Stefan Winter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "radext@ietf.org" X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qs7n1imJHnU5nJEB5uB9awhwDeeEPTR9q" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/E09ns6sCzEt01Lgofl0KDxMLXp8 Subject: [radext] TRAC ticket for radius-fragmentation X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 12:11:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --qs7n1imJHnU5nJEB5uB9awhwDeeEPTR9q Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090802070004030307040203" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090802070004030307040203 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I just created a TRAC ticket with a comment on the current -06 version which I found while writing the PROTO wire-up. TRAC again did not send out a notification, so I wonder if it's on its way into nirvana again. Could the authors please check if this link yields a proper TRAC ticket? http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/177 For the record, the message I got from TRAC suggests that sending email is currently broken: Warning: The ticket has been created, but an error occurred while sending notifications: {u'stefan.winter@restena.lu': (451, 'Temporary local problem - please try later'), u'draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org': (451, 'Temporary local problem - please try later'), u'radext@ietf.org': (451, 'Temporary local problem - please try later')} Greetings, Stefan Winter --=20 Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - R=E9seau T=E9l=E9informatique de l'Education National= e et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473 PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 --------------090802070004030307040203 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="0x8A39DC66.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0x8A39DC66.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) mQINBFIplEwBEADTSz+DS8nio+RSvfSLLfaOnCGi1nqpn8Pb1laVUyEvnAAzZ5je miS88GxfiDH6hUGlWzcaW0hCfUHGiohr485adbjxRksPngWgAt/1bRxpifsW3zOb Fjgog01WWQV5Sihlwc4zr8zvYbFA5BJZ6YdkR9C5J015riv5OS30WTjA65SSXgYr b7zJWPwmegTFwE093uBFvC39waz3xYpVu5j87nO6w2MVQt/8sY2/2BFPEq+xfOaj l18UEwc7w8SCgnZdlVNcmEK4UBvJuwS/1lsR2JeQa8Gu1EDxC7PRgMgNXsDSWnnB e9aVmfG54+6ILe1QH2dwk9sPBQT5w2+vjijrb3Dv9ur+1kN+TNU2XE436jVpnnY/ 3OsLdix30STQn4Q/XOm7YoVMeDwwviefilRxzK0dXA+wKj92T68Od82CFxuZqPAg BCVmWfQM91iK9piqFK+QP+R3vF6+NGDBdwbe68iVKs0v5L8XmbxBQndjpmo+lo2a smBR2TAIfZHaKdgtBw13u3GPVVKlg/Mpko8ki9JOSem2aFyi3kQEVKptWgXT3POl 97DWJzsR5VyKz6GOx9kJAEISRyLZwm0wqh8+9LCza5oeIKW381lzq1b9x30vOh8C BSQQJ+cG9ko0yPHAj7Suw2TmPXx1qMctmE6Ahq82ZW30SljdZby8WQuR2wARAQAB tDxTdGVmYW4gV2ludGVyIChSRVNURU5BIGtleSAyMDEzKykgPHN0ZWZhbi53aW50 ZXJAcmVzdGVuYS5sdT6JAjkEEwECACMFAlIplEwCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZj7/D/99hVS+mJr8dSPCaDaUFFxBiT2eI1Lo R8VKEerTCRw5BsdL6pN2eRJZ9NmsqWo1ynWVHEzO91bNZ+oZGgyoNohcBAI7p+r0 qUTzkyqwdZO4kMm0pqKoM9xkP3tf2mjGujKjOz4Y7S7wnz2ZFokeUsecoRVJF/++ /qHnmeWLn44J1HUKLHYCjMu+QXGOgGXgz024jQ5eUrnPwzNp0Z90AFVHlWC+bymt y/ToIUUCQqS5Ff0jzdWLd8U695OG9iGvjBQT1LdEjsfbAwuKV5UcnpxNqUpUwKa5 9hdX5/2cMZP07FI1UXwnBlxa8rJfdb13FLjSKX4vUUHedYUZMjMPgcwl1a+zGE22 lHiSQWgP8QLA/W3BLsi22ERCEPZBfexOeOtaWIItDIz18fIaQoMDoRPshzar0JI2 CzLYsyeKySAtYJEHFVoLmMvhkwzBmgqA/BEswUA67CfCr1jFHRXdpmWM7YkyAmMa 9q6LwquWKS5+MXlUXe/3oZUcgpw/T9Uuy3Jo3RdS7B3jFcWaVr6KsO/A9u1gr/aY n5M+iJTQSj4vzqtkQaJTpSspRZoKa66HZt3IwSYiDiYZqtM83ynuj9kjnZzGfnuT aNIi996q6Mptr33mOzIE1wmMqnJYwTr3EcNtf483q/qrJwh5ES8Q9xY7aat/ZcSl 8fKubW4TlfVr8YhGBBARAgAGBQJSKZUGAAoJEPo5vdH/HhVmYTgAn24eoqO/O98o vNpt08Uab/+/tmYKAJ9kjXm9Njz5h33efzeelZUa484rr7kCDQRSKZRMARAAvBPp n7FQq7LQ5glohtbL6XIEo1U4X67S0TzUYieENSWSVYuWYIhCBldmWdmH8Bpj/qHe qdon7v+SLtR4WngzMR9toupKcFfHnbP9kpazTSB2ySHxXWGX1gJOpPXdCcg9iveK BHEsDn00ThTcPsvtXpnnzET16pXIvOXO0bxTmVZ4INIF1SWgvYma/g8kBbgXLpkj 8tOywBqFiiYPEZlDeCxDHiMgUDh6olda9K/0TZFTdMPUgjKuubfAeaDNCOrVt4Rj mFOaRLikcZocmgJhm3z/j25x7/mnNu+0di1H/S67YGQJ+pqCFInzIXDx7aRW2+JC iqsY2X3xOPWZZzjyis5SNnfOcPH3gt2hYz1fy+thsBGf4NgCN01JRqIJ2/MOQCgU dwh+9l8xqaJvCkUHM4hVh4W62MAe1u7UEqQbvvNEqxM5034vcvlE+/LRkrDCspw+ 2YJ9QyroLerVRwW5DVleP8Ifi8VB3yD80nqXYs9aqRy0BkDNIQ43ERhESMt8dJqr NkxgC6pemZrhNwyDh+hy2kPNGQh/iBpdKuH1o3E24TIZoV2v3YHvzob7aAYHddE/ PofAXhJW7I9mAs+HdWDmnI8ckuPDFpFH+Y/BFGvEXgcnJAJ1wEvf+4LuiIi0MHjR 4EWFn9vvoFDAIqD10h3FSd3D59HGtdSsNn4XaCsAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQIACQUCUimU TAIbDAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZhBtEACL036ddjc5pFoYIdoUY1vT8SMXJNquewCnL1qu DADzqDZFU5GNlQEy10krSfBwlTb9ahTtE0JFrOdZwUZtoa1Pgfr8nU6KOgrXPHbN jS/9dyc5CwGVVIpOavIm2CsMVDJ9LCF/NT+u/t1k6eGfHhPVl3dUQyDa/lzc1chK UIVQYQkFmr0A/iXP+29lFCaI+IeyU0bSdZhezDwUROn5vEx+fiPZyHDShCb+BxJv /o2LQp9JHenCiSbO+ioRZdxgbWfoKBuXOfmSStqMWXas/gZ5vS3xq72LNtKPRxgp jX3P8Zml1XDqpcBau7eK75VKE0Yd06YxnUIsbcEzInUc3uzW/u0DFpXYkMJb0XIv JyUt5yYPKfV13N8kSkPi5pLxm8yuftXMzfgeFMR7nafY3glTVj/TxElzg6xeZNqf C2ZjIbBtZg9ylHU8u8wwB+dX282crs0R3N9A064C71/cXlBqcjzjlKH2NUIWGxr+ od3TXFIFjszSU3NgMPKrWNhFLLwS81MpbkOe73s6aDhS8RDyNucoxtKXriLR+4Xi u4+pyj5ukYP1JqpB3ZobY/XZgCnJMye+7xeTpIDJ1LPORxM3NNAElyb26lxAK2P+ km+EpI0Zzz6rNSCfg5jYQ474+e/GBgaSG4MlaPoZ+XAfN46u1Xjjv1/AkkA4IA6m 5zP5og=3D=3D =3D3NUt -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------090802070004030307040203-- --qs7n1imJHnU5nJEB5uB9awhwDeeEPTR9q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTiHVLAAoJEMDeajWKOdxmecsQAKKBnfXRq5awT2pGaE/V8yxX 3D7ENLd9jjNBFyB5V5ytBn6ebw5KLAP1/uXnbKd2Z1WWzBxsn4kwaDevlsV5XNP1 GeXEny3RvphpXtMNpi3BaV2Vi98iX2Avhm/h6ugWjGaOeXr8GHVMfaYY+mSzBAsQ RpAH2UJysmkxqxJp53FX2t7jiuzzxTX1cnaHK1ZQUb2mkLRebmxLvVq5OEEA57W3 /aygNlB7ycHir8ukHt6eue+zSHWiA6lKG9XxI4SUYN++iPPTHbQ/AGA8QT/ZBkn+ uk/BhGPDA8hw5NIuPTXyhyS1DP6fTDDHFbJz4f+sPRazqZZSPHgIBan4moOZFJCj qXHT7K0Ul60mdGPRDrGhsLqcpijgTKzBHzgWZJ7d0GvbHW6WtkZS4tYbOwIIXPUg 4/DGCS3et+xahg6bn/sh4AD/b+OUF5JE891dTzBllxY9UvRsVIwCHH3cPDESBl+w hDjGw2ucDotmPtcCgZen7SG7rqHZSK5cijVZCoCGgkdi0Xn5y0wo+ZeBUZnvzOpp VFcWM59xsJb/3plB935OVwGDVChYfDICawXHP4+51O9pUqhTQdyrdwv8utcAx1hk lwWTHSvGkCGj1mERY+Nn+H+DOgEEkkng+TFGJTTZuatk203pm4WNUAll+Q/+m3Jq brVx6RrpNRQ+drndKsQR =o5nH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qs7n1imJHnU5nJEB5uB9awhwDeeEPTR9q-- From nobody Fri May 30 05:16:33 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120F81A6F49 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 05:16:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.851 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oRRhSGPyJbhg for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 05:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xenon24.um.es (xenon24.um.es [155.54.212.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFE71A08BC for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 05:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xenon24.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id B468CC5B9 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:16:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by antispam in UMU at xenon24.um.es Received: from xenon24.um.es ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xenon24.um.es [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id FDfKS9vcPvkL for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:16:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [155.54.205.49] (inf-205-49.inf.um.es [155.54.205.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: alex) by xenon24.um.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93569C56F for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:16:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5388768F.6080205@um.es> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:16:15 +0200 From: Alejandro Perez Mendez User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radext@ietf.org References: <5388754B.101@restena.lu> In-Reply-To: <5388754B.101@restena.lu> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020103090602070203030906" Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/DfVU4WCgD1AroSVX6JFLuHO55vM Subject: Re: [radext] TRAC ticket for radius-fragmentation X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 12:16:31 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020103090602070203030906 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit El 30/05/14 14:10, Stefan Winter escribió: > Hello, > > I just created a TRAC ticket with a comment on the current -06 version > which I found while writing the PROTO wire-up. > > TRAC again did not send out a notification, so I wonder if it's on its > way into nirvana again. Could the authors please check if this link > yields a proper TRAC ticket? > > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/177 I've never used before, but clicking on the link shows a ticket description, regarding the "formal violation part". Is that what I'm supposed to see? Regards, Alejandro > > For the record, the message I got from TRAC suggests that sending email > is currently broken: > > Warning: The ticket has been created, but an error occurred while > sending notifications: {u'stefan.winter@restena.lu': (451, 'Temporary > local problem - please try later'), > u'draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org': (451, > 'Temporary local problem - please try later'), u'radext@ietf.org': (451, > 'Temporary local problem - please try later')} > > Greetings, > > Stefan Winter > > > > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext --------------020103090602070203030906 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
El 30/05/14 14:10, Stefan Winter escribió:
Hello,

I just created a TRAC ticket with a comment on the current -06 version
which I found while writing the PROTO wire-up.

TRAC again did not send out a notification, so I wonder if it's on its
way into nirvana again. Could the authors please check if this link
yields a proper TRAC ticket?

http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/177

I've never used before, but clicking on the link shows a ticket description, regarding the "formal violation part". Is that what I'm supposed to see?

Regards,
Alejandro

For the record, the message I got from TRAC suggests that sending email
is currently broken:

Warning: The ticket has been created, but an error occurred while
sending notifications: {u'stefan.winter@restena.lu': (451, 'Temporary
local problem - please try later'),
u'draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org': (451,
'Temporary local problem - please try later'), u'radext@ietf.org': (451,
'Temporary local problem - please try later')}

Greetings,

Stefan Winter




_______________________________________________
radext mailing list
radext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext

--------------020103090602070203030906-- From nobody Fri May 30 05:19:39 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C445D1A6F54 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 05:19:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wArybZ67TUR7 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 05:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AC31A08BC for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 05:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663941058B for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:19:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 565791058A for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 14:19:31 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <53887753.7090209@restena.lu> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:19:31 +0200 From: Stefan Winter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radext@ietf.org References: <5388754B.101@restena.lu> <5388768F.6080205@um.es> In-Reply-To: <5388768F.6080205@um.es> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wa0tw97NoEH8pmsWGj9HlTiA4mkdf5WaU" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/NFiap7NY0DG3VZSAC1K_xVR1MP0 Subject: Re: [radext] TRAC ticket for radius-fragmentation X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:37 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --wa0tw97NoEH8pmsWGj9HlTiA4mkdf5WaU Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050805030306050903020706" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050805030306050903020706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, >> TRAC again did not send out a notification, so I wonder if it's on its= >> way into nirvana again. Could the authors please check if this link >> yields a proper TRAC ticket? >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/177 >=20 > I've never used before, but clicking on the link shows a ticket > description, regarding the "formal violation part". Is that what I'm > supposed to see? Yes, good, then I can empty my paste buffer :-) Stefan >=20 > Regards, > Alejandro >> >> For the record, the message I got from TRAC suggests that sending emai= l >> is currently broken: >> >> Warning: The ticket has been created, but an error occurred while >> sending notifications: {u'stefan.winter@restena.lu': (451, 'Temporary >> local problem - please try later'), >> u'draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org': (451, >> 'Temporary local problem - please try later'), u'radext@ietf.org': (45= 1, >> 'Temporary local problem - please try later')} >> >> Greetings, >> >> Stefan Winter >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> radext mailing list >> radext@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > radext mailing list > radext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext >=20 --=20 Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - R=E9seau T=E9l=E9informatique de l'Education National= e et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473 PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 --------------050805030306050903020706 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="0x8A39DC66.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0x8A39DC66.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) mQINBFIplEwBEADTSz+DS8nio+RSvfSLLfaOnCGi1nqpn8Pb1laVUyEvnAAzZ5je miS88GxfiDH6hUGlWzcaW0hCfUHGiohr485adbjxRksPngWgAt/1bRxpifsW3zOb Fjgog01WWQV5Sihlwc4zr8zvYbFA5BJZ6YdkR9C5J015riv5OS30WTjA65SSXgYr b7zJWPwmegTFwE093uBFvC39waz3xYpVu5j87nO6w2MVQt/8sY2/2BFPEq+xfOaj l18UEwc7w8SCgnZdlVNcmEK4UBvJuwS/1lsR2JeQa8Gu1EDxC7PRgMgNXsDSWnnB e9aVmfG54+6ILe1QH2dwk9sPBQT5w2+vjijrb3Dv9ur+1kN+TNU2XE436jVpnnY/ 3OsLdix30STQn4Q/XOm7YoVMeDwwviefilRxzK0dXA+wKj92T68Od82CFxuZqPAg BCVmWfQM91iK9piqFK+QP+R3vF6+NGDBdwbe68iVKs0v5L8XmbxBQndjpmo+lo2a smBR2TAIfZHaKdgtBw13u3GPVVKlg/Mpko8ki9JOSem2aFyi3kQEVKptWgXT3POl 97DWJzsR5VyKz6GOx9kJAEISRyLZwm0wqh8+9LCza5oeIKW381lzq1b9x30vOh8C BSQQJ+cG9ko0yPHAj7Suw2TmPXx1qMctmE6Ahq82ZW30SljdZby8WQuR2wARAQAB tDxTdGVmYW4gV2ludGVyIChSRVNURU5BIGtleSAyMDEzKykgPHN0ZWZhbi53aW50 ZXJAcmVzdGVuYS5sdT6JAjkEEwECACMFAlIplEwCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZj7/D/99hVS+mJr8dSPCaDaUFFxBiT2eI1Lo R8VKEerTCRw5BsdL6pN2eRJZ9NmsqWo1ynWVHEzO91bNZ+oZGgyoNohcBAI7p+r0 qUTzkyqwdZO4kMm0pqKoM9xkP3tf2mjGujKjOz4Y7S7wnz2ZFokeUsecoRVJF/++ /qHnmeWLn44J1HUKLHYCjMu+QXGOgGXgz024jQ5eUrnPwzNp0Z90AFVHlWC+bymt y/ToIUUCQqS5Ff0jzdWLd8U695OG9iGvjBQT1LdEjsfbAwuKV5UcnpxNqUpUwKa5 9hdX5/2cMZP07FI1UXwnBlxa8rJfdb13FLjSKX4vUUHedYUZMjMPgcwl1a+zGE22 lHiSQWgP8QLA/W3BLsi22ERCEPZBfexOeOtaWIItDIz18fIaQoMDoRPshzar0JI2 CzLYsyeKySAtYJEHFVoLmMvhkwzBmgqA/BEswUA67CfCr1jFHRXdpmWM7YkyAmMa 9q6LwquWKS5+MXlUXe/3oZUcgpw/T9Uuy3Jo3RdS7B3jFcWaVr6KsO/A9u1gr/aY n5M+iJTQSj4vzqtkQaJTpSspRZoKa66HZt3IwSYiDiYZqtM83ynuj9kjnZzGfnuT aNIi996q6Mptr33mOzIE1wmMqnJYwTr3EcNtf483q/qrJwh5ES8Q9xY7aat/ZcSl 8fKubW4TlfVr8YhGBBARAgAGBQJSKZUGAAoJEPo5vdH/HhVmYTgAn24eoqO/O98o vNpt08Uab/+/tmYKAJ9kjXm9Njz5h33efzeelZUa484rr7kCDQRSKZRMARAAvBPp n7FQq7LQ5glohtbL6XIEo1U4X67S0TzUYieENSWSVYuWYIhCBldmWdmH8Bpj/qHe qdon7v+SLtR4WngzMR9toupKcFfHnbP9kpazTSB2ySHxXWGX1gJOpPXdCcg9iveK BHEsDn00ThTcPsvtXpnnzET16pXIvOXO0bxTmVZ4INIF1SWgvYma/g8kBbgXLpkj 8tOywBqFiiYPEZlDeCxDHiMgUDh6olda9K/0TZFTdMPUgjKuubfAeaDNCOrVt4Rj mFOaRLikcZocmgJhm3z/j25x7/mnNu+0di1H/S67YGQJ+pqCFInzIXDx7aRW2+JC iqsY2X3xOPWZZzjyis5SNnfOcPH3gt2hYz1fy+thsBGf4NgCN01JRqIJ2/MOQCgU dwh+9l8xqaJvCkUHM4hVh4W62MAe1u7UEqQbvvNEqxM5034vcvlE+/LRkrDCspw+ 2YJ9QyroLerVRwW5DVleP8Ifi8VB3yD80nqXYs9aqRy0BkDNIQ43ERhESMt8dJqr NkxgC6pemZrhNwyDh+hy2kPNGQh/iBpdKuH1o3E24TIZoV2v3YHvzob7aAYHddE/ PofAXhJW7I9mAs+HdWDmnI8ckuPDFpFH+Y/BFGvEXgcnJAJ1wEvf+4LuiIi0MHjR 4EWFn9vvoFDAIqD10h3FSd3D59HGtdSsNn4XaCsAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQIACQUCUimU TAIbDAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZhBtEACL036ddjc5pFoYIdoUY1vT8SMXJNquewCnL1qu DADzqDZFU5GNlQEy10krSfBwlTb9ahTtE0JFrOdZwUZtoa1Pgfr8nU6KOgrXPHbN jS/9dyc5CwGVVIpOavIm2CsMVDJ9LCF/NT+u/t1k6eGfHhPVl3dUQyDa/lzc1chK UIVQYQkFmr0A/iXP+29lFCaI+IeyU0bSdZhezDwUROn5vEx+fiPZyHDShCb+BxJv /o2LQp9JHenCiSbO+ioRZdxgbWfoKBuXOfmSStqMWXas/gZ5vS3xq72LNtKPRxgp jX3P8Zml1XDqpcBau7eK75VKE0Yd06YxnUIsbcEzInUc3uzW/u0DFpXYkMJb0XIv JyUt5yYPKfV13N8kSkPi5pLxm8yuftXMzfgeFMR7nafY3glTVj/TxElzg6xeZNqf C2ZjIbBtZg9ylHU8u8wwB+dX282crs0R3N9A064C71/cXlBqcjzjlKH2NUIWGxr+ od3TXFIFjszSU3NgMPKrWNhFLLwS81MpbkOe73s6aDhS8RDyNucoxtKXriLR+4Xi u4+pyj5ukYP1JqpB3ZobY/XZgCnJMye+7xeTpIDJ1LPORxM3NNAElyb26lxAK2P+ km+EpI0Zzz6rNSCfg5jYQ474+e/GBgaSG4MlaPoZ+XAfN46u1Xjjv1/AkkA4IA6m 5zP5og=3D=3D =3D3NUt -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------050805030306050903020706-- --wa0tw97NoEH8pmsWGj9HlTiA4mkdf5WaU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTiHdTAAoJEMDeajWKOdxm4y4QALoIttELPowoQex01yesCgj4 SvSv4i8fjyivJYQWZzqZ59i/rf8mtabn4v7EaBq3N8mF2T3/1QlL/6jzktLHExJc CaXOkHXZ+5ZvI4m7ju7ACupYnhJuRHwpHa2ege3V8ylT4EowJG3tKGEvqZlumhxK NkzuzBprpGew7NYhTxMxroxNW3ZlGVeGtuB3zDIi3hbhejxL1yOnjZ8vT7gtId0h zDfm0VhGua0smAEHV0YUcS7IRrDPxqxOazVcjbpZyNsJhPET6c4YEe1uCuqiLHd+ a35fjxBHgKYuO71FTXM9m+vrwESLEC8A9unadk+6K+Q4xF//ophCW2Zg2j0nEpt8 6rGJy/af9l/L+TfZ+mJn3MmgfKeOEg3IGSJFFojArUo6GJgqIILHyY8oQo8dDoGp RaI/fP1urpSmB5LKtrYe+7Iov5XqaSbdiX0lmh4ihwzYX5dXuRfHFE5Gnuh/LPD9 rkkcq62YEUQzuuC7UigiaClZ6Wrmx/81T2YGQ28ZX94n2xDgoqh+lfZ821jc8kL7 LJ871XNEzpoK5kGgYGM1S0dB6A8eHdpagJI5BJ8i+4kxMszKIjaqBmDerVBh0pQs YJ+1wSPA5RyqN9vE2TlZ2vNpbGpRFBd2yhVjOXGMGhwJUCr8CW4zLHAkHJFoX04F 02PSaZHrH2bq1g9rF4Ul =scFV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wa0tw97NoEH8pmsWGj9HlTiA4mkdf5WaU-- From nobody Fri May 30 07:18:21 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F4C1A700C for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:18:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OoDrlf3Vo9ZW for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:18:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6501A090E for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:18:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17D11058A for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 16:18:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFCC510585 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 16:18:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <53889323.4000205@restena.lu> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 16:18:11 +0200 From: Stefan Winter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "radext@ietf.org" X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9dvtcfd5sh4E9Hg3Vv3RX7UBLIRhuoewe" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/5ypNgYrwZVruOgdj_0qxR51XT1c Subject: [radext] TRAC ticket 178 (bidirectional fragmentation) X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:18:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --9dvtcfd5sh4E9Hg3Vv3RX7UBLIRhuoewe Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020006030904050804000702" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020006030904050804000702 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, email notifications still don't work, so here's again a manual link for the next issue: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/178 Greetings, Stefan Winter --=20 Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - R=E9seau T=E9l=E9informatique de l'Education National= e et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473 PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 --------------020006030904050804000702 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="0x8A39DC66.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0x8A39DC66.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) mQINBFIplEwBEADTSz+DS8nio+RSvfSLLfaOnCGi1nqpn8Pb1laVUyEvnAAzZ5je miS88GxfiDH6hUGlWzcaW0hCfUHGiohr485adbjxRksPngWgAt/1bRxpifsW3zOb Fjgog01WWQV5Sihlwc4zr8zvYbFA5BJZ6YdkR9C5J015riv5OS30WTjA65SSXgYr b7zJWPwmegTFwE093uBFvC39waz3xYpVu5j87nO6w2MVQt/8sY2/2BFPEq+xfOaj l18UEwc7w8SCgnZdlVNcmEK4UBvJuwS/1lsR2JeQa8Gu1EDxC7PRgMgNXsDSWnnB e9aVmfG54+6ILe1QH2dwk9sPBQT5w2+vjijrb3Dv9ur+1kN+TNU2XE436jVpnnY/ 3OsLdix30STQn4Q/XOm7YoVMeDwwviefilRxzK0dXA+wKj92T68Od82CFxuZqPAg BCVmWfQM91iK9piqFK+QP+R3vF6+NGDBdwbe68iVKs0v5L8XmbxBQndjpmo+lo2a smBR2TAIfZHaKdgtBw13u3GPVVKlg/Mpko8ki9JOSem2aFyi3kQEVKptWgXT3POl 97DWJzsR5VyKz6GOx9kJAEISRyLZwm0wqh8+9LCza5oeIKW381lzq1b9x30vOh8C BSQQJ+cG9ko0yPHAj7Suw2TmPXx1qMctmE6Ahq82ZW30SljdZby8WQuR2wARAQAB tDxTdGVmYW4gV2ludGVyIChSRVNURU5BIGtleSAyMDEzKykgPHN0ZWZhbi53aW50 ZXJAcmVzdGVuYS5sdT6JAjkEEwECACMFAlIplEwCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZj7/D/99hVS+mJr8dSPCaDaUFFxBiT2eI1Lo R8VKEerTCRw5BsdL6pN2eRJZ9NmsqWo1ynWVHEzO91bNZ+oZGgyoNohcBAI7p+r0 qUTzkyqwdZO4kMm0pqKoM9xkP3tf2mjGujKjOz4Y7S7wnz2ZFokeUsecoRVJF/++ /qHnmeWLn44J1HUKLHYCjMu+QXGOgGXgz024jQ5eUrnPwzNp0Z90AFVHlWC+bymt y/ToIUUCQqS5Ff0jzdWLd8U695OG9iGvjBQT1LdEjsfbAwuKV5UcnpxNqUpUwKa5 9hdX5/2cMZP07FI1UXwnBlxa8rJfdb13FLjSKX4vUUHedYUZMjMPgcwl1a+zGE22 lHiSQWgP8QLA/W3BLsi22ERCEPZBfexOeOtaWIItDIz18fIaQoMDoRPshzar0JI2 CzLYsyeKySAtYJEHFVoLmMvhkwzBmgqA/BEswUA67CfCr1jFHRXdpmWM7YkyAmMa 9q6LwquWKS5+MXlUXe/3oZUcgpw/T9Uuy3Jo3RdS7B3jFcWaVr6KsO/A9u1gr/aY n5M+iJTQSj4vzqtkQaJTpSspRZoKa66HZt3IwSYiDiYZqtM83ynuj9kjnZzGfnuT aNIi996q6Mptr33mOzIE1wmMqnJYwTr3EcNtf483q/qrJwh5ES8Q9xY7aat/ZcSl 8fKubW4TlfVr8YhGBBARAgAGBQJSKZUGAAoJEPo5vdH/HhVmYTgAn24eoqO/O98o vNpt08Uab/+/tmYKAJ9kjXm9Njz5h33efzeelZUa484rr7kCDQRSKZRMARAAvBPp n7FQq7LQ5glohtbL6XIEo1U4X67S0TzUYieENSWSVYuWYIhCBldmWdmH8Bpj/qHe qdon7v+SLtR4WngzMR9toupKcFfHnbP9kpazTSB2ySHxXWGX1gJOpPXdCcg9iveK BHEsDn00ThTcPsvtXpnnzET16pXIvOXO0bxTmVZ4INIF1SWgvYma/g8kBbgXLpkj 8tOywBqFiiYPEZlDeCxDHiMgUDh6olda9K/0TZFTdMPUgjKuubfAeaDNCOrVt4Rj mFOaRLikcZocmgJhm3z/j25x7/mnNu+0di1H/S67YGQJ+pqCFInzIXDx7aRW2+JC iqsY2X3xOPWZZzjyis5SNnfOcPH3gt2hYz1fy+thsBGf4NgCN01JRqIJ2/MOQCgU dwh+9l8xqaJvCkUHM4hVh4W62MAe1u7UEqQbvvNEqxM5034vcvlE+/LRkrDCspw+ 2YJ9QyroLerVRwW5DVleP8Ifi8VB3yD80nqXYs9aqRy0BkDNIQ43ERhESMt8dJqr NkxgC6pemZrhNwyDh+hy2kPNGQh/iBpdKuH1o3E24TIZoV2v3YHvzob7aAYHddE/ PofAXhJW7I9mAs+HdWDmnI8ckuPDFpFH+Y/BFGvEXgcnJAJ1wEvf+4LuiIi0MHjR 4EWFn9vvoFDAIqD10h3FSd3D59HGtdSsNn4XaCsAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQIACQUCUimU TAIbDAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZhBtEACL036ddjc5pFoYIdoUY1vT8SMXJNquewCnL1qu DADzqDZFU5GNlQEy10krSfBwlTb9ahTtE0JFrOdZwUZtoa1Pgfr8nU6KOgrXPHbN jS/9dyc5CwGVVIpOavIm2CsMVDJ9LCF/NT+u/t1k6eGfHhPVl3dUQyDa/lzc1chK UIVQYQkFmr0A/iXP+29lFCaI+IeyU0bSdZhezDwUROn5vEx+fiPZyHDShCb+BxJv /o2LQp9JHenCiSbO+ioRZdxgbWfoKBuXOfmSStqMWXas/gZ5vS3xq72LNtKPRxgp jX3P8Zml1XDqpcBau7eK75VKE0Yd06YxnUIsbcEzInUc3uzW/u0DFpXYkMJb0XIv JyUt5yYPKfV13N8kSkPi5pLxm8yuftXMzfgeFMR7nafY3glTVj/TxElzg6xeZNqf C2ZjIbBtZg9ylHU8u8wwB+dX282crs0R3N9A064C71/cXlBqcjzjlKH2NUIWGxr+ od3TXFIFjszSU3NgMPKrWNhFLLwS81MpbkOe73s6aDhS8RDyNucoxtKXriLR+4Xi u4+pyj5ukYP1JqpB3ZobY/XZgCnJMye+7xeTpIDJ1LPORxM3NNAElyb26lxAK2P+ km+EpI0Zzz6rNSCfg5jYQ474+e/GBgaSG4MlaPoZ+XAfN46u1Xjjv1/AkkA4IA6m 5zP5og=3D=3D =3D3NUt -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------020006030904050804000702-- --9dvtcfd5sh4E9Hg3Vv3RX7UBLIRhuoewe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTiJMjAAoJEMDeajWKOdxmZ2YQAJ68JMa9GXm8gUHWCywtKylw zFEeEZRySt/zcTULbpWjyJEXR5m7irP8+vKlGxPUUNWf4K/DBNZ04a0ZL66BQg74 wX2vi9kSAlobpjz4UVqK/HAuQHee8wPMXR3ZFhSKQ0pJvGy+rL4c87g9dxO0O1Lr rmnsv+CraLzX1X3qcJFbZQzYkvxy+4Y3mectlsRZM2+cFEjI7PeG9Naze/G2KJS5 UvypSklg8sHDSIHrNuNMTx+VrAgcvcbD3n3n1ZIN2T2NeLdi/g7T6mq3h6+vCPB+ 14LaZ+Kf44OnSYLlszU/n4hQJrzPl4a102o7iwL6/y772iTzE/uOXedB4IFu21E1 2eA+N75Lzkx4589sg1RQvKbDKnpBnx3e+RlKGSAYmWwGSTfOOZxxeuGTpdUmBemq SDRo7F/kIW+va7Tf0xvTeG9kMQ+JKf2kZ+4xrq7fu6WzYvUh7jM4WFcyrWwhVrGZ t1HDP8k7MbgDrcTayzLWVqrlOkVAgQy39MIR7RrSfxrfblMknPMiy/bKdF/0MwJx t7OlR+vb+vvC66f2Shj0x21HTq0TgKadNd50SKGHNnDJH7HQaYm3G/2XXN1Cvnq9 5UgI4xM0D8Y0ghLk4I1ZXtcdXyC2MpjJS0yIYSnuIw0lf7xiiBf4hRZ0fW/FJd5+ MtXvgWGbosFjlEgG+00B =1ND/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9dvtcfd5sh4E9Hg3Vv3RX7UBLIRhuoewe--