From nobody Mon Jun 2 02:08:54 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B62A1A0105 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:08:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.15 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BKBsjLsYaOVy for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:08:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5AA1A01B7 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:08:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2431A10580 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:08:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1691D1057E for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:08:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <538C3F1C.8040305@restena.lu> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:08:44 +0200 From: Stefan Winter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "radext@ietf.org" X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TfKpv1d4wBqCl15iaXSBRTPIaFvXuIBCo" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/Lg_g3EA6fT1UPLFD71Z8Pbl-x70 Subject: [radext] TRAC ticket 179 for radius-fragmentation X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:08:53 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --TfKpv1d4wBqCl15iaXSBRTPIaFvXuIBCo Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090103010804050900050804" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090103010804050900050804 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, see: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/179 "draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-06: IANA considerations In the course of the PROTO write-up review, it occured to me that the IANA Considerations section defines the new RADIUS type "Frag-Status" (good!) but does not enumerate the values of that new type. The new type's value definition can currently only be found inline in the document (section 9.1: Reserved, Fragmentation-Supported, More-Data-Pending, More-Data-Request). This enumeration should be copied into the IANA Considerations section so that IANA can easily create the corresponding table "Values for RADIUS Attribute N, Frag-Status"." Greetings, Stefan Winter --=20 Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - R=E9seau T=E9l=E9informatique de l'Education National= e et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473 PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 --------------090103010804050900050804 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="0x8A39DC66.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0x8A39DC66.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) mQINBFIplEwBEADTSz+DS8nio+RSvfSLLfaOnCGi1nqpn8Pb1laVUyEvnAAzZ5je miS88GxfiDH6hUGlWzcaW0hCfUHGiohr485adbjxRksPngWgAt/1bRxpifsW3zOb Fjgog01WWQV5Sihlwc4zr8zvYbFA5BJZ6YdkR9C5J015riv5OS30WTjA65SSXgYr b7zJWPwmegTFwE093uBFvC39waz3xYpVu5j87nO6w2MVQt/8sY2/2BFPEq+xfOaj l18UEwc7w8SCgnZdlVNcmEK4UBvJuwS/1lsR2JeQa8Gu1EDxC7PRgMgNXsDSWnnB e9aVmfG54+6ILe1QH2dwk9sPBQT5w2+vjijrb3Dv9ur+1kN+TNU2XE436jVpnnY/ 3OsLdix30STQn4Q/XOm7YoVMeDwwviefilRxzK0dXA+wKj92T68Od82CFxuZqPAg BCVmWfQM91iK9piqFK+QP+R3vF6+NGDBdwbe68iVKs0v5L8XmbxBQndjpmo+lo2a smBR2TAIfZHaKdgtBw13u3GPVVKlg/Mpko8ki9JOSem2aFyi3kQEVKptWgXT3POl 97DWJzsR5VyKz6GOx9kJAEISRyLZwm0wqh8+9LCza5oeIKW381lzq1b9x30vOh8C BSQQJ+cG9ko0yPHAj7Suw2TmPXx1qMctmE6Ahq82ZW30SljdZby8WQuR2wARAQAB tDxTdGVmYW4gV2ludGVyIChSRVNURU5BIGtleSAyMDEzKykgPHN0ZWZhbi53aW50 ZXJAcmVzdGVuYS5sdT6JAjkEEwECACMFAlIplEwCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZj7/D/99hVS+mJr8dSPCaDaUFFxBiT2eI1Lo R8VKEerTCRw5BsdL6pN2eRJZ9NmsqWo1ynWVHEzO91bNZ+oZGgyoNohcBAI7p+r0 qUTzkyqwdZO4kMm0pqKoM9xkP3tf2mjGujKjOz4Y7S7wnz2ZFokeUsecoRVJF/++ /qHnmeWLn44J1HUKLHYCjMu+QXGOgGXgz024jQ5eUrnPwzNp0Z90AFVHlWC+bymt y/ToIUUCQqS5Ff0jzdWLd8U695OG9iGvjBQT1LdEjsfbAwuKV5UcnpxNqUpUwKa5 9hdX5/2cMZP07FI1UXwnBlxa8rJfdb13FLjSKX4vUUHedYUZMjMPgcwl1a+zGE22 lHiSQWgP8QLA/W3BLsi22ERCEPZBfexOeOtaWIItDIz18fIaQoMDoRPshzar0JI2 CzLYsyeKySAtYJEHFVoLmMvhkwzBmgqA/BEswUA67CfCr1jFHRXdpmWM7YkyAmMa 9q6LwquWKS5+MXlUXe/3oZUcgpw/T9Uuy3Jo3RdS7B3jFcWaVr6KsO/A9u1gr/aY n5M+iJTQSj4vzqtkQaJTpSspRZoKa66HZt3IwSYiDiYZqtM83ynuj9kjnZzGfnuT aNIi996q6Mptr33mOzIE1wmMqnJYwTr3EcNtf483q/qrJwh5ES8Q9xY7aat/ZcSl 8fKubW4TlfVr8YhGBBARAgAGBQJSKZUGAAoJEPo5vdH/HhVmYTgAn24eoqO/O98o vNpt08Uab/+/tmYKAJ9kjXm9Njz5h33efzeelZUa484rr7kCDQRSKZRMARAAvBPp n7FQq7LQ5glohtbL6XIEo1U4X67S0TzUYieENSWSVYuWYIhCBldmWdmH8Bpj/qHe qdon7v+SLtR4WngzMR9toupKcFfHnbP9kpazTSB2ySHxXWGX1gJOpPXdCcg9iveK BHEsDn00ThTcPsvtXpnnzET16pXIvOXO0bxTmVZ4INIF1SWgvYma/g8kBbgXLpkj 8tOywBqFiiYPEZlDeCxDHiMgUDh6olda9K/0TZFTdMPUgjKuubfAeaDNCOrVt4Rj mFOaRLikcZocmgJhm3z/j25x7/mnNu+0di1H/S67YGQJ+pqCFInzIXDx7aRW2+JC iqsY2X3xOPWZZzjyis5SNnfOcPH3gt2hYz1fy+thsBGf4NgCN01JRqIJ2/MOQCgU dwh+9l8xqaJvCkUHM4hVh4W62MAe1u7UEqQbvvNEqxM5034vcvlE+/LRkrDCspw+ 2YJ9QyroLerVRwW5DVleP8Ifi8VB3yD80nqXYs9aqRy0BkDNIQ43ERhESMt8dJqr NkxgC6pemZrhNwyDh+hy2kPNGQh/iBpdKuH1o3E24TIZoV2v3YHvzob7aAYHddE/ PofAXhJW7I9mAs+HdWDmnI8ckuPDFpFH+Y/BFGvEXgcnJAJ1wEvf+4LuiIi0MHjR 4EWFn9vvoFDAIqD10h3FSd3D59HGtdSsNn4XaCsAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQIACQUCUimU TAIbDAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZhBtEACL036ddjc5pFoYIdoUY1vT8SMXJNquewCnL1qu DADzqDZFU5GNlQEy10krSfBwlTb9ahTtE0JFrOdZwUZtoa1Pgfr8nU6KOgrXPHbN jS/9dyc5CwGVVIpOavIm2CsMVDJ9LCF/NT+u/t1k6eGfHhPVl3dUQyDa/lzc1chK UIVQYQkFmr0A/iXP+29lFCaI+IeyU0bSdZhezDwUROn5vEx+fiPZyHDShCb+BxJv /o2LQp9JHenCiSbO+ioRZdxgbWfoKBuXOfmSStqMWXas/gZ5vS3xq72LNtKPRxgp jX3P8Zml1XDqpcBau7eK75VKE0Yd06YxnUIsbcEzInUc3uzW/u0DFpXYkMJb0XIv JyUt5yYPKfV13N8kSkPi5pLxm8yuftXMzfgeFMR7nafY3glTVj/TxElzg6xeZNqf C2ZjIbBtZg9ylHU8u8wwB+dX282crs0R3N9A064C71/cXlBqcjzjlKH2NUIWGxr+ od3TXFIFjszSU3NgMPKrWNhFLLwS81MpbkOe73s6aDhS8RDyNucoxtKXriLR+4Xi u4+pyj5ukYP1JqpB3ZobY/XZgCnJMye+7xeTpIDJ1LPORxM3NNAElyb26lxAK2P+ km+EpI0Zzz6rNSCfg5jYQ474+e/GBgaSG4MlaPoZ+XAfN46u1Xjjv1/AkkA4IA6m 5zP5og=3D=3D =3D3NUt -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------090103010804050900050804-- --TfKpv1d4wBqCl15iaXSBRTPIaFvXuIBCo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTjD8cAAoJEMDeajWKOdxm4CAP/2ACVHXD6OJ5M1GHzZMWuJW2 4/eZTQp2wF32IduQNs9Xf4iggAlmf/qeBTb7BG7EICYBPjY6tdrUWgUnPvEr9c/t 8ZFEP9SV0g+tJCfMRriLMaaxbBstnBvcLjLsdpAP1gBopomIFBOgVcT9xRyiz7pl A57FQVJse2LDUahv3kwmxy5y8CmIjwCmXcYBhxuFkvtxZonL5lcaXUiUUz4S3S/4 X9IUn78B75qZ9fLaNoHNZa94UvRMcZZoncEKQYerx7WocyMscEHOZBfdg+rlQKVe aGs6KZ3pqag7CWpx8e3mQ/aBfnRIK+XxZNfUkm5+lhTsC8OwY5tz6vMF4isjTKdi Gl/mKoUFnROzLIi3yJQBl6iBvs/qk8Acn5jSsomZt0TaywP7gZiOP5ZujNb5Ke7E jov2hVvCa7E1scVedw4QOKWSwPamQIhS1KKCDgX5QB4Y7AS9TriRby77pM9G2F8s sqwlIebZ66OazLVGV6SgnaQPbx6o3WWTIx24acqRsZqtt1mf4b1SyeoRfLCLOEx6 yTb3Aet7/r/sPAEx8PPQISS/yZXJquyLctah9Cdtj8vrzGvUj8Ao9uWEyFKq5hcl pQFnT9sHTNzPAaMo5dCGv9q3Ag8nf70XEqWiF6KMyQsJgn0Tw+29pybRv1zHuuVX tzKZ/gGes96/Q3hb0GFx =P2/k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TfKpv1d4wBqCl15iaXSBRTPIaFvXuIBCo-- From nobody Mon Jun 2 02:54:10 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90B01A01C5 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:54:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8R8Y00SYsvac for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A8E1A008B for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC94C10580 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:54:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9DE01057F for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:54:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <538C49B9.6090609@restena.lu> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:54:01 +0200 From: Stefan Winter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "radext@ietf.org" X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aXop84c63cuIKNrO66a83hjwO1MXnX62B" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/jXrTLkvMGPH1R-XzLxSKuquOf4c Subject: [radext] TRAC ticket 180 for radius-fragmentation X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:54:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --aXop84c63cuIKNrO66a83hjwO1MXnX62B Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000108010203050607060601" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000108010203050607060601 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/180 --=20 Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - R=E9seau T=E9l=E9informatique de l'Education National= e et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473 PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 --------------000108010203050607060601 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="0x8A39DC66.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0x8A39DC66.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) mQINBFIplEwBEADTSz+DS8nio+RSvfSLLfaOnCGi1nqpn8Pb1laVUyEvnAAzZ5je miS88GxfiDH6hUGlWzcaW0hCfUHGiohr485adbjxRksPngWgAt/1bRxpifsW3zOb Fjgog01WWQV5Sihlwc4zr8zvYbFA5BJZ6YdkR9C5J015riv5OS30WTjA65SSXgYr b7zJWPwmegTFwE093uBFvC39waz3xYpVu5j87nO6w2MVQt/8sY2/2BFPEq+xfOaj l18UEwc7w8SCgnZdlVNcmEK4UBvJuwS/1lsR2JeQa8Gu1EDxC7PRgMgNXsDSWnnB e9aVmfG54+6ILe1QH2dwk9sPBQT5w2+vjijrb3Dv9ur+1kN+TNU2XE436jVpnnY/ 3OsLdix30STQn4Q/XOm7YoVMeDwwviefilRxzK0dXA+wKj92T68Od82CFxuZqPAg BCVmWfQM91iK9piqFK+QP+R3vF6+NGDBdwbe68iVKs0v5L8XmbxBQndjpmo+lo2a smBR2TAIfZHaKdgtBw13u3GPVVKlg/Mpko8ki9JOSem2aFyi3kQEVKptWgXT3POl 97DWJzsR5VyKz6GOx9kJAEISRyLZwm0wqh8+9LCza5oeIKW381lzq1b9x30vOh8C BSQQJ+cG9ko0yPHAj7Suw2TmPXx1qMctmE6Ahq82ZW30SljdZby8WQuR2wARAQAB tDxTdGVmYW4gV2ludGVyIChSRVNURU5BIGtleSAyMDEzKykgPHN0ZWZhbi53aW50 ZXJAcmVzdGVuYS5sdT6JAjkEEwECACMFAlIplEwCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZj7/D/99hVS+mJr8dSPCaDaUFFxBiT2eI1Lo R8VKEerTCRw5BsdL6pN2eRJZ9NmsqWo1ynWVHEzO91bNZ+oZGgyoNohcBAI7p+r0 qUTzkyqwdZO4kMm0pqKoM9xkP3tf2mjGujKjOz4Y7S7wnz2ZFokeUsecoRVJF/++ /qHnmeWLn44J1HUKLHYCjMu+QXGOgGXgz024jQ5eUrnPwzNp0Z90AFVHlWC+bymt y/ToIUUCQqS5Ff0jzdWLd8U695OG9iGvjBQT1LdEjsfbAwuKV5UcnpxNqUpUwKa5 9hdX5/2cMZP07FI1UXwnBlxa8rJfdb13FLjSKX4vUUHedYUZMjMPgcwl1a+zGE22 lHiSQWgP8QLA/W3BLsi22ERCEPZBfexOeOtaWIItDIz18fIaQoMDoRPshzar0JI2 CzLYsyeKySAtYJEHFVoLmMvhkwzBmgqA/BEswUA67CfCr1jFHRXdpmWM7YkyAmMa 9q6LwquWKS5+MXlUXe/3oZUcgpw/T9Uuy3Jo3RdS7B3jFcWaVr6KsO/A9u1gr/aY n5M+iJTQSj4vzqtkQaJTpSspRZoKa66HZt3IwSYiDiYZqtM83ynuj9kjnZzGfnuT aNIi996q6Mptr33mOzIE1wmMqnJYwTr3EcNtf483q/qrJwh5ES8Q9xY7aat/ZcSl 8fKubW4TlfVr8YhGBBARAgAGBQJSKZUGAAoJEPo5vdH/HhVmYTgAn24eoqO/O98o vNpt08Uab/+/tmYKAJ9kjXm9Njz5h33efzeelZUa484rr7kCDQRSKZRMARAAvBPp n7FQq7LQ5glohtbL6XIEo1U4X67S0TzUYieENSWSVYuWYIhCBldmWdmH8Bpj/qHe qdon7v+SLtR4WngzMR9toupKcFfHnbP9kpazTSB2ySHxXWGX1gJOpPXdCcg9iveK BHEsDn00ThTcPsvtXpnnzET16pXIvOXO0bxTmVZ4INIF1SWgvYma/g8kBbgXLpkj 8tOywBqFiiYPEZlDeCxDHiMgUDh6olda9K/0TZFTdMPUgjKuubfAeaDNCOrVt4Rj mFOaRLikcZocmgJhm3z/j25x7/mnNu+0di1H/S67YGQJ+pqCFInzIXDx7aRW2+JC iqsY2X3xOPWZZzjyis5SNnfOcPH3gt2hYz1fy+thsBGf4NgCN01JRqIJ2/MOQCgU dwh+9l8xqaJvCkUHM4hVh4W62MAe1u7UEqQbvvNEqxM5034vcvlE+/LRkrDCspw+ 2YJ9QyroLerVRwW5DVleP8Ifi8VB3yD80nqXYs9aqRy0BkDNIQ43ERhESMt8dJqr NkxgC6pemZrhNwyDh+hy2kPNGQh/iBpdKuH1o3E24TIZoV2v3YHvzob7aAYHddE/ PofAXhJW7I9mAs+HdWDmnI8ckuPDFpFH+Y/BFGvEXgcnJAJ1wEvf+4LuiIi0MHjR 4EWFn9vvoFDAIqD10h3FSd3D59HGtdSsNn4XaCsAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQIACQUCUimU TAIbDAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZhBtEACL036ddjc5pFoYIdoUY1vT8SMXJNquewCnL1qu DADzqDZFU5GNlQEy10krSfBwlTb9ahTtE0JFrOdZwUZtoa1Pgfr8nU6KOgrXPHbN jS/9dyc5CwGVVIpOavIm2CsMVDJ9LCF/NT+u/t1k6eGfHhPVl3dUQyDa/lzc1chK UIVQYQkFmr0A/iXP+29lFCaI+IeyU0bSdZhezDwUROn5vEx+fiPZyHDShCb+BxJv /o2LQp9JHenCiSbO+ioRZdxgbWfoKBuXOfmSStqMWXas/gZ5vS3xq72LNtKPRxgp jX3P8Zml1XDqpcBau7eK75VKE0Yd06YxnUIsbcEzInUc3uzW/u0DFpXYkMJb0XIv JyUt5yYPKfV13N8kSkPi5pLxm8yuftXMzfgeFMR7nafY3glTVj/TxElzg6xeZNqf C2ZjIbBtZg9ylHU8u8wwB+dX282crs0R3N9A064C71/cXlBqcjzjlKH2NUIWGxr+ od3TXFIFjszSU3NgMPKrWNhFLLwS81MpbkOe73s6aDhS8RDyNucoxtKXriLR+4Xi u4+pyj5ukYP1JqpB3ZobY/XZgCnJMye+7xeTpIDJ1LPORxM3NNAElyb26lxAK2P+ km+EpI0Zzz6rNSCfg5jYQ474+e/GBgaSG4MlaPoZ+XAfN46u1Xjjv1/AkkA4IA6m 5zP5og=3D=3D =3D3NUt -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------000108010203050607060601-- --aXop84c63cuIKNrO66a83hjwO1MXnX62B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTjEm5AAoJEMDeajWKOdxmYtIP/jQGaCZmrg1i+hhehzcKQBNa mQf+lv8vhQuPxas/bo2EFOOKY23wlU9mV3pZrGLOpEh81ssFFaNj7yEPAHRUaPNv oLG992pCzWK7jg7xxyZLiofmWL0+96/lxZnh8Q9Gq1rQfg34SLfWJAY+G85HTL+3 pkYyq/0A8ptyUcfj+KrSb0iP6tzE6k8LQUASasW3lJ/5WVoz6heo/xIvvOk0Iz6V sT/ptldFFr5qD5t/cTzAQTa22a7T6HvOibkJg9tNEdIk0JMH7Pyp0NeXHROXXLY9 P+fdvv0hRdRGOFYdrv8NGfBqVtDbUsB/ZxnZqWIWpP3xAKIJxjrXg677vPYhNgVb UruqAeehROQjwzt2CMnEUbPezTvpIKP53lbyEPXnggQxnv9U18IVUvAFtn968him 10RBgB7HdZ697qB0Rvk3RBUbe51ETuHIrjHFPWdeC+Ndix3c6YfpImSA8PC7uWU3 n0QSfc705lYdr5mrbcu3RqhgS8ls6ExWYgc81SsAvbX6TId9KH/IHONF+n7VQACN S7KqDYg7unPBk4nBtlhw2OGfQbtnUpbLoH1RpA+6Fe+GrpKPyolxdc6SFWCMeD6X BQJw8G9XVKQOyGI1Dqi12TK5nT76shrERrxR/Ezl4gAphGxI9Ohsrs5edlGIIjVj GOBFpMp5r+7bUKHCTB+2 =ycpk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aXop84c63cuIKNrO66a83hjwO1MXnX62B-- From nobody Mon Jun 2 02:58:02 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3DC1A01C5 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:58:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ELaBj4BG1nf2 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FB51A008B for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:57:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502A410580 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:57:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E8D51057F for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:57:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <538C4AA1.3070207@restena.lu> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:57:53 +0200 From: Stefan Winter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "radext@ietf.org" X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vuRtRgT8HnwvxPguHFim9w9XGvsNpjm7L" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/4Roqoc3Sy3hZVzYQPlCFOLf0nqY Subject: [radext] TRAC ticket 181 for radius-fragmentation X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:58:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --vuRtRgT8HnwvxPguHFim9w9XGvsNpjm7L Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000109020704050009010709" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000109020704050009010709 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/181 (this concludes my review) --=20 Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - R=E9seau T=E9l=E9informatique de l'Education National= e et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473 PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 --------------000109020704050009010709 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="0x8A39DC66.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0x8A39DC66.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) mQINBFIplEwBEADTSz+DS8nio+RSvfSLLfaOnCGi1nqpn8Pb1laVUyEvnAAzZ5je miS88GxfiDH6hUGlWzcaW0hCfUHGiohr485adbjxRksPngWgAt/1bRxpifsW3zOb Fjgog01WWQV5Sihlwc4zr8zvYbFA5BJZ6YdkR9C5J015riv5OS30WTjA65SSXgYr b7zJWPwmegTFwE093uBFvC39waz3xYpVu5j87nO6w2MVQt/8sY2/2BFPEq+xfOaj l18UEwc7w8SCgnZdlVNcmEK4UBvJuwS/1lsR2JeQa8Gu1EDxC7PRgMgNXsDSWnnB e9aVmfG54+6ILe1QH2dwk9sPBQT5w2+vjijrb3Dv9ur+1kN+TNU2XE436jVpnnY/ 3OsLdix30STQn4Q/XOm7YoVMeDwwviefilRxzK0dXA+wKj92T68Od82CFxuZqPAg BCVmWfQM91iK9piqFK+QP+R3vF6+NGDBdwbe68iVKs0v5L8XmbxBQndjpmo+lo2a smBR2TAIfZHaKdgtBw13u3GPVVKlg/Mpko8ki9JOSem2aFyi3kQEVKptWgXT3POl 97DWJzsR5VyKz6GOx9kJAEISRyLZwm0wqh8+9LCza5oeIKW381lzq1b9x30vOh8C BSQQJ+cG9ko0yPHAj7Suw2TmPXx1qMctmE6Ahq82ZW30SljdZby8WQuR2wARAQAB tDxTdGVmYW4gV2ludGVyIChSRVNURU5BIGtleSAyMDEzKykgPHN0ZWZhbi53aW50 ZXJAcmVzdGVuYS5sdT6JAjkEEwECACMFAlIplEwCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZj7/D/99hVS+mJr8dSPCaDaUFFxBiT2eI1Lo R8VKEerTCRw5BsdL6pN2eRJZ9NmsqWo1ynWVHEzO91bNZ+oZGgyoNohcBAI7p+r0 qUTzkyqwdZO4kMm0pqKoM9xkP3tf2mjGujKjOz4Y7S7wnz2ZFokeUsecoRVJF/++ /qHnmeWLn44J1HUKLHYCjMu+QXGOgGXgz024jQ5eUrnPwzNp0Z90AFVHlWC+bymt y/ToIUUCQqS5Ff0jzdWLd8U695OG9iGvjBQT1LdEjsfbAwuKV5UcnpxNqUpUwKa5 9hdX5/2cMZP07FI1UXwnBlxa8rJfdb13FLjSKX4vUUHedYUZMjMPgcwl1a+zGE22 lHiSQWgP8QLA/W3BLsi22ERCEPZBfexOeOtaWIItDIz18fIaQoMDoRPshzar0JI2 CzLYsyeKySAtYJEHFVoLmMvhkwzBmgqA/BEswUA67CfCr1jFHRXdpmWM7YkyAmMa 9q6LwquWKS5+MXlUXe/3oZUcgpw/T9Uuy3Jo3RdS7B3jFcWaVr6KsO/A9u1gr/aY n5M+iJTQSj4vzqtkQaJTpSspRZoKa66HZt3IwSYiDiYZqtM83ynuj9kjnZzGfnuT aNIi996q6Mptr33mOzIE1wmMqnJYwTr3EcNtf483q/qrJwh5ES8Q9xY7aat/ZcSl 8fKubW4TlfVr8YhGBBARAgAGBQJSKZUGAAoJEPo5vdH/HhVmYTgAn24eoqO/O98o vNpt08Uab/+/tmYKAJ9kjXm9Njz5h33efzeelZUa484rr7kCDQRSKZRMARAAvBPp n7FQq7LQ5glohtbL6XIEo1U4X67S0TzUYieENSWSVYuWYIhCBldmWdmH8Bpj/qHe qdon7v+SLtR4WngzMR9toupKcFfHnbP9kpazTSB2ySHxXWGX1gJOpPXdCcg9iveK BHEsDn00ThTcPsvtXpnnzET16pXIvOXO0bxTmVZ4INIF1SWgvYma/g8kBbgXLpkj 8tOywBqFiiYPEZlDeCxDHiMgUDh6olda9K/0TZFTdMPUgjKuubfAeaDNCOrVt4Rj mFOaRLikcZocmgJhm3z/j25x7/mnNu+0di1H/S67YGQJ+pqCFInzIXDx7aRW2+JC iqsY2X3xOPWZZzjyis5SNnfOcPH3gt2hYz1fy+thsBGf4NgCN01JRqIJ2/MOQCgU dwh+9l8xqaJvCkUHM4hVh4W62MAe1u7UEqQbvvNEqxM5034vcvlE+/LRkrDCspw+ 2YJ9QyroLerVRwW5DVleP8Ifi8VB3yD80nqXYs9aqRy0BkDNIQ43ERhESMt8dJqr NkxgC6pemZrhNwyDh+hy2kPNGQh/iBpdKuH1o3E24TIZoV2v3YHvzob7aAYHddE/ PofAXhJW7I9mAs+HdWDmnI8ckuPDFpFH+Y/BFGvEXgcnJAJ1wEvf+4LuiIi0MHjR 4EWFn9vvoFDAIqD10h3FSd3D59HGtdSsNn4XaCsAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQIACQUCUimU TAIbDAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZhBtEACL036ddjc5pFoYIdoUY1vT8SMXJNquewCnL1qu DADzqDZFU5GNlQEy10krSfBwlTb9ahTtE0JFrOdZwUZtoa1Pgfr8nU6KOgrXPHbN jS/9dyc5CwGVVIpOavIm2CsMVDJ9LCF/NT+u/t1k6eGfHhPVl3dUQyDa/lzc1chK UIVQYQkFmr0A/iXP+29lFCaI+IeyU0bSdZhezDwUROn5vEx+fiPZyHDShCb+BxJv /o2LQp9JHenCiSbO+ioRZdxgbWfoKBuXOfmSStqMWXas/gZ5vS3xq72LNtKPRxgp jX3P8Zml1XDqpcBau7eK75VKE0Yd06YxnUIsbcEzInUc3uzW/u0DFpXYkMJb0XIv JyUt5yYPKfV13N8kSkPi5pLxm8yuftXMzfgeFMR7nafY3glTVj/TxElzg6xeZNqf C2ZjIbBtZg9ylHU8u8wwB+dX282crs0R3N9A064C71/cXlBqcjzjlKH2NUIWGxr+ od3TXFIFjszSU3NgMPKrWNhFLLwS81MpbkOe73s6aDhS8RDyNucoxtKXriLR+4Xi u4+pyj5ukYP1JqpB3ZobY/XZgCnJMye+7xeTpIDJ1LPORxM3NNAElyb26lxAK2P+ km+EpI0Zzz6rNSCfg5jYQ474+e/GBgaSG4MlaPoZ+XAfN46u1Xjjv1/AkkA4IA6m 5zP5og=3D=3D =3D3NUt -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------000109020704050009010709-- --vuRtRgT8HnwvxPguHFim9w9XGvsNpjm7L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTjEqiAAoJEMDeajWKOdxm23QP/0nHZ+y3vNDlpfaxocN5itqS qR72HaHalvQdFsGwrukF12jo5wtyhDhXhI4uFLDyzmt7RDfCzfsF6hiNlDtrRUV/ dJG1ZpiL0v5xN/Tvfyz9FPZbFH5+H+IlgE0/ti1e4mjJQxJ5igdLLJC1AhA/cOKh mP6y27Z5SNm6femKdAinNW5M1xbPEjJ2TDxUI1bBylgo2DAi0387223nGqUsUXPy 3OODIm4HOvb1pRbWd1PYQkSo9M4KpCgXaCZILOJmYV6U9JUa21ncAwDxRB/ykFR5 LiGSezRhKNU5nScs86xL6kDn4n+J5gHmg/CFPqImro54W5lI+kUvQsxvFowTncd1 oQpV4o55EAmpKt0w0M1J6gX9bd5ATx1MLAApsGi1AaNu+Z/VCnez1eNyWBmJ7fwZ tvv7TLokwNIXGimfnP5+7lLylHkhPd6p/emzqMfeUzYDMlWiqQ86LD/KCx7ZhFFJ m0s4tVHEVKHHBmIrVu+OjNVuPXYJU7maJIIybEdmvAqE00Fg/CCcUWW1b6y3ESCu V5imx1tJ8DW8yGQ4f2Rd9wS6pweu7ImCsBXpSIAqhuPmFr5RyGFdWTt9N5pRqofd Z7urkzlPGDa8TAZ+Me0xocn5VC163dcUIlpa0UuJW07RBtB4Dl0oTx/Oyi0o92W6 oHhvfK5sL1pH/hv5R1gD =7odF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vuRtRgT8HnwvxPguHFim9w9XGvsNpjm7L-- From nobody Tue Jun 3 23:38:29 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CFA1A009C for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:38:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FGwHixaxZoRn for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (smtprelay.restena.lu [IPv6:2001:a18:1::62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9F81A00B0 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtprelay.restena.lu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB97310580 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 08:38:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7] (unknown [IPv6:2001:a18:1:8:921b:eff:fe1b:d2e7]) by smtprelay.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE0DC1057F for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 08:38:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <538EBEDA.3040009@restena.lu> Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 08:38:18 +0200 From: Stefan Winter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "radext@ietf.org" X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66; url=http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="P2jhVSwQjN7l9ftKRn6D2u2nsqqohGgpQ" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/baqOpNZYWXdHm3TuKZJjv6A1900 Subject: [radext] Call for agenda items for IETF90 X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 06:38:27 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --P2jhVSwQjN7l9ftKRn6D2u2nsqqohGgpQ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020400050507050507020301" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020400050507050507020301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, we still have plenty of time, but it's always good to start early. We have requested a 90 minute slot for radext at IETF90. In the early draft below, I have already pre-allocated time slots for work items on our agenda and for individual draft submissions. That early draft below (not yet in the datatracker) still has 25 minutes of free space! So, if you want to discuss something or if you think we should reserve more time for drafts than what I foresaw, please respond to this mail. RADEXT WG IETF 90 Agenda =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Chairs: Jouni Korhonen Stefan Winter Jabber room: radext at jabber.ietf.org (Please join) Time and Day TBD Place TBD Preliminaries (10 min) ---------------------- Audio/Video & Remote Presentation Debugging Note Well Note Takers Jabber scribe Agenda bash Document Status Working group draft discussion (50 minutes) ------------------------------------------- (DTLS should not need any time?) (DynDisc should not need any time?) draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-00 : 10 min draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets-00 : 10 min draft-ietf-radext-nai-05 : 5 min draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-06 : 5 min 20 min free remaining Individual draft discussions (20 minutes) ----------------------------------------- CoA proxying : 10 min eduroam architecture: 5 min 5 min free time remaining Wrap-up (10 minutes) -------------------- Next Steps: WG Chairs & ADs --=20 Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - R=E9seau T=E9l=E9informatique de l'Education National= e et de la Recherche 6, rue Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi L-1359 Luxembourg Tel: +352 424409 1 Fax: +352 422473 PGP key updated to 4096 Bit RSA - I will encrypt all mails if the recipient's key is known to me http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xC0DE6A358A39DC66 --------------020400050507050507020301 Content-Type: application/pgp-keys; name="0x8A39DC66.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0x8A39DC66.asc" -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) mQINBFIplEwBEADTSz+DS8nio+RSvfSLLfaOnCGi1nqpn8Pb1laVUyEvnAAzZ5je miS88GxfiDH6hUGlWzcaW0hCfUHGiohr485adbjxRksPngWgAt/1bRxpifsW3zOb Fjgog01WWQV5Sihlwc4zr8zvYbFA5BJZ6YdkR9C5J015riv5OS30WTjA65SSXgYr b7zJWPwmegTFwE093uBFvC39waz3xYpVu5j87nO6w2MVQt/8sY2/2BFPEq+xfOaj l18UEwc7w8SCgnZdlVNcmEK4UBvJuwS/1lsR2JeQa8Gu1EDxC7PRgMgNXsDSWnnB e9aVmfG54+6ILe1QH2dwk9sPBQT5w2+vjijrb3Dv9ur+1kN+TNU2XE436jVpnnY/ 3OsLdix30STQn4Q/XOm7YoVMeDwwviefilRxzK0dXA+wKj92T68Od82CFxuZqPAg BCVmWfQM91iK9piqFK+QP+R3vF6+NGDBdwbe68iVKs0v5L8XmbxBQndjpmo+lo2a smBR2TAIfZHaKdgtBw13u3GPVVKlg/Mpko8ki9JOSem2aFyi3kQEVKptWgXT3POl 97DWJzsR5VyKz6GOx9kJAEISRyLZwm0wqh8+9LCza5oeIKW381lzq1b9x30vOh8C BSQQJ+cG9ko0yPHAj7Suw2TmPXx1qMctmE6Ahq82ZW30SljdZby8WQuR2wARAQAB tDxTdGVmYW4gV2ludGVyIChSRVNURU5BIGtleSAyMDEzKykgPHN0ZWZhbi53aW50 ZXJAcmVzdGVuYS5sdT6JAjkEEwECACMFAlIplEwCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsE FgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZj7/D/99hVS+mJr8dSPCaDaUFFxBiT2eI1Lo R8VKEerTCRw5BsdL6pN2eRJZ9NmsqWo1ynWVHEzO91bNZ+oZGgyoNohcBAI7p+r0 qUTzkyqwdZO4kMm0pqKoM9xkP3tf2mjGujKjOz4Y7S7wnz2ZFokeUsecoRVJF/++ /qHnmeWLn44J1HUKLHYCjMu+QXGOgGXgz024jQ5eUrnPwzNp0Z90AFVHlWC+bymt y/ToIUUCQqS5Ff0jzdWLd8U695OG9iGvjBQT1LdEjsfbAwuKV5UcnpxNqUpUwKa5 9hdX5/2cMZP07FI1UXwnBlxa8rJfdb13FLjSKX4vUUHedYUZMjMPgcwl1a+zGE22 lHiSQWgP8QLA/W3BLsi22ERCEPZBfexOeOtaWIItDIz18fIaQoMDoRPshzar0JI2 CzLYsyeKySAtYJEHFVoLmMvhkwzBmgqA/BEswUA67CfCr1jFHRXdpmWM7YkyAmMa 9q6LwquWKS5+MXlUXe/3oZUcgpw/T9Uuy3Jo3RdS7B3jFcWaVr6KsO/A9u1gr/aY n5M+iJTQSj4vzqtkQaJTpSspRZoKa66HZt3IwSYiDiYZqtM83ynuj9kjnZzGfnuT aNIi996q6Mptr33mOzIE1wmMqnJYwTr3EcNtf483q/qrJwh5ES8Q9xY7aat/ZcSl 8fKubW4TlfVr8YhGBBARAgAGBQJSKZUGAAoJEPo5vdH/HhVmYTgAn24eoqO/O98o vNpt08Uab/+/tmYKAJ9kjXm9Njz5h33efzeelZUa484rr7kCDQRSKZRMARAAvBPp n7FQq7LQ5glohtbL6XIEo1U4X67S0TzUYieENSWSVYuWYIhCBldmWdmH8Bpj/qHe qdon7v+SLtR4WngzMR9toupKcFfHnbP9kpazTSB2ySHxXWGX1gJOpPXdCcg9iveK BHEsDn00ThTcPsvtXpnnzET16pXIvOXO0bxTmVZ4INIF1SWgvYma/g8kBbgXLpkj 8tOywBqFiiYPEZlDeCxDHiMgUDh6olda9K/0TZFTdMPUgjKuubfAeaDNCOrVt4Rj mFOaRLikcZocmgJhm3z/j25x7/mnNu+0di1H/S67YGQJ+pqCFInzIXDx7aRW2+JC iqsY2X3xOPWZZzjyis5SNnfOcPH3gt2hYz1fy+thsBGf4NgCN01JRqIJ2/MOQCgU dwh+9l8xqaJvCkUHM4hVh4W62MAe1u7UEqQbvvNEqxM5034vcvlE+/LRkrDCspw+ 2YJ9QyroLerVRwW5DVleP8Ifi8VB3yD80nqXYs9aqRy0BkDNIQ43ERhESMt8dJqr NkxgC6pemZrhNwyDh+hy2kPNGQh/iBpdKuH1o3E24TIZoV2v3YHvzob7aAYHddE/ PofAXhJW7I9mAs+HdWDmnI8ckuPDFpFH+Y/BFGvEXgcnJAJ1wEvf+4LuiIi0MHjR 4EWFn9vvoFDAIqD10h3FSd3D59HGtdSsNn4XaCsAEQEAAYkCHwQYAQIACQUCUimU TAIbDAAKCRDA3mo1ijncZhBtEACL036ddjc5pFoYIdoUY1vT8SMXJNquewCnL1qu DADzqDZFU5GNlQEy10krSfBwlTb9ahTtE0JFrOdZwUZtoa1Pgfr8nU6KOgrXPHbN jS/9dyc5CwGVVIpOavIm2CsMVDJ9LCF/NT+u/t1k6eGfHhPVl3dUQyDa/lzc1chK UIVQYQkFmr0A/iXP+29lFCaI+IeyU0bSdZhezDwUROn5vEx+fiPZyHDShCb+BxJv /o2LQp9JHenCiSbO+ioRZdxgbWfoKBuXOfmSStqMWXas/gZ5vS3xq72LNtKPRxgp jX3P8Zml1XDqpcBau7eK75VKE0Yd06YxnUIsbcEzInUc3uzW/u0DFpXYkMJb0XIv JyUt5yYPKfV13N8kSkPi5pLxm8yuftXMzfgeFMR7nafY3glTVj/TxElzg6xeZNqf C2ZjIbBtZg9ylHU8u8wwB+dX282crs0R3N9A064C71/cXlBqcjzjlKH2NUIWGxr+ od3TXFIFjszSU3NgMPKrWNhFLLwS81MpbkOe73s6aDhS8RDyNucoxtKXriLR+4Xi u4+pyj5ukYP1JqpB3ZobY/XZgCnJMye+7xeTpIDJ1LPORxM3NNAElyb26lxAK2P+ km+EpI0Zzz6rNSCfg5jYQ474+e/GBgaSG4MlaPoZ+XAfN46u1Xjjv1/AkkA4IA6m 5zP5og=3D=3D =3D3NUt -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --------------020400050507050507020301-- --P2jhVSwQjN7l9ftKRn6D2u2nsqqohGgpQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTjr7aAAoJEMDeajWKOdxmb8YP/iUVOLF2+oZNUcMjPCOug4Pp NzVMx//0R0AzoufDJOZvqXi+PmpLkbPuzvIqQBz7YawAV39PLxsPRhsFubv4Wl50 ESGgHPpEHpa6sRRynSv/4dOWH7IDA0B0F/ZwCvZJ3xeXSt1Jhx5+fJmeVkFkrB1G tAFtqh3hiLRV/3GhwUNz4gcWMv0liaLwdqbiS84g6rKs6D0ctdTQDY8JU4XftpTI wU1nZCTfPjiaVdQNLKeO45meDGyRGFxW31pBM20PNVihKlgLR7DNPfAfqXPcuH+4 dSjT5N6CeAhQCpcVA5rRJJ7UcCDyRYyzS6YtL9qVcVqNMUKGI5nAPaOvyWkm986o 68H32AjCNNaqzz6VAI7bpY17nFXyUXnlOMZDs37rgS5VbSfXBSDLMRFoM8W56Ish I/X7MESsdoPbZaSYOgx1TSH3HnW+v4qQryKN3AMkTDlJyD4AlCnLu7P3tv3n12Xe //n4AglxLHr0MydPwHQeop0pCKYCtwjpBFbFXvAnCiuE+2iyw3yHy4pDo4inQgGS ej/LdyZqjTbyU6OIUccvgLh8oetrVfupVypjQZpOAZ/X4HgtkwY8Y0HHPnE4pG8R xhORb4oEHER7rDnMlg5DKQHL+qAJDCDrkuB944T9ya4w8ZwAKVD2L1wqIJFOKO16 f7rdQFP/UFU3vmzEsSIj =oTiG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --P2jhVSwQjN7l9ftKRn6D2u2nsqqohGgpQ-- From nobody Thu Jun 12 16:05:14 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D301A02FA; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:05:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ukevUlh50SZ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9685C1A02E5; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:05:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.5.0.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140612230507.30042.6918.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:05:07 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/GGN8wd3smzdp_B18A80yJ1zIjcc Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-01.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:05:09 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting Authors : Dean Cheng Jouni Korhonen Mohamed Boucadair Senthil Sivakumar Filename : draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-01.txt Pages : 34 Date : 2014-06-12 Abstract: This document defines three new RADIUS attributes. For devices that implementing IP port ranges, these attributes are used to communicate with a RADIUS server in order to configure and report TCP/UDP ports and ICMP identifiers, as well as mapping behavior for specific hosts. This mechanism can be used in various deployment scenarios such as CGN (Carrier Grade NAT), NAT64, Provider WLAN Gateway, etc. This document does not make any assumption about the deployment context. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Jun 17 14:28:56 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BE71A0183 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:28:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.251 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_NAIL=2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cq8mcR0YHVnD for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65C351A017C for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38972 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Wx0vq-0006QL-2f; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:28:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, aland@deployingradius.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:28:42 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/173#comment:1 Message-ID: <080.c23d1a4e7f001bc17269f7dc803f41a3@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <065.7ee2e2cf3c36cf187a9d2190742ab3c4@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 173 In-Reply-To: <065.7ee2e2cf3c36cf187a9d2190742ab3c4@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, aland@deployingradius.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@freeradius.org Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/4eKLn-2ptDK1mELWxy3otF7CGLg Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #173 (nai): draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: nits X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:28:50 -0000 #173: draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: nits Changes (by aland@deployingradius.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Items 1-6 are fixed in the next rev, as are 2 refs for item 7. The reference to RFC 5335 isn't fixed, because RFC 6532 doesn't define ABNF for email addresses, while RFC 5335 does. The reference is informative, so I think it's OK. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | nai@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: nai | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Resolution: fixed Writeup | Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Tue Jun 17 14:34:57 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096B81A019D for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:34:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.251 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_NAIL=2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fRmc0zHOWxKP for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C16B1A0183 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39060 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Wx11m-00070N-A4; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:34:50 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, aland@deployingradius.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:34:50 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/175#comment:1 Message-ID: <080.8309a4f425c49ef9d0ef721642261263@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <065.274438d4aeae4f9a94f3d1ee792506f3@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 175 In-Reply-To: <065.274438d4aeae4f9a94f3d1ee792506f3@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, aland@deployingradius.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@freeradius.org Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/yJ4yMB2qXFd5JiLJVKU5-YlusBw Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #175 (nai): draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: IANA considerations X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:34:54 -0000 #175: draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: IANA considerations Changes (by aland@deployingradius.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Done for the next rev. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | nai@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: nai | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Resolution: fixed Writeup | Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Tue Jun 17 14:39:47 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFAF21A0189 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:39:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.251 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MANGLED_NAIL=2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWB3eaoFK-UE for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33DDB1A017C for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39124 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Wx16Q-0007Mn-Km; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:39:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, aland@deployingradius.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:39:38 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/176#comment:1 Message-ID: <080.187563b7a98218620fe0f8797b2665a0@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <065.18ebd81ae64d013f63a780221f34a543@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 176 In-Reply-To: <065.18ebd81ae64d013f63a780221f34a543@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-nai@tools.ietf.org, aland@deployingradius.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@freeradius.org Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/zjOb5fLahgAwi8TEbGL0Jh6ZtcY Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #176 (nai): draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: is the term *Network Access* Identifier still appropriate? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:39:44 -0000 #176: draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: is the term *Network Access* Identifier still appropriate? Comment (by aland@deployingradius.com): I think this requires larger discussion in the WG -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | nai@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: nai | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Resolution: Writeup | Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Tue Jun 17 14:40:58 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A3A1A019D; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:40:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gs5yJnAPWGqO; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:40:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46C41A017C; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:40:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.5.0.p2 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140617214051.32565.24756.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:40:51 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/0xz6sUy22MtX3zlrPpMlzY-No1k Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-nai-06.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 21:40:53 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : The Network Access Identifier Author : Alan DeKok Filename : draft-ietf-radext-nai-06.txt Pages : 24 Date : 2014-06-17 Abstract: In order to provide inter-domain authentication services, it is necessary to have a standardized method that domains can use to identify each other's users. This document defines the syntax for the Network Access Identifier (NAI), the user identity submitted by the client prior to accessing network resources. This document is a revised version of RFC 4282, which addresses issues with international character sets, as well as a number of other corrections to the previous document. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-nai/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-nai-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-radext-nai-06 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue Jun 17 23:42:18 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F111A001E for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:42:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gUNrNFY49E-k for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8592D1A001D for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:42:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ty20so215189lab.39 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:42:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5vQM/SBrm/UybxvqZhhdubVpo6Limqr0D8RnQSpwpOA=; b=aA9pRaP6VEnQsQj3As74Ydq5eB6g06eUQP0MagCcE6rgF4PulGPoga4t1WssBGzrnW w3rkx51DmR9/KvaLFWWHhuC6vI+7nnf82+BhQYKapT+k7WRLhF6wk///insWcQCj+Ron scE75U9MILFB+kAxm1SEWBdiGjwDhl2eVQvRHxp4W2TLyMHsw8uh8FonB4+AhZr2s0pr r9SCAg8t8IOSHTRKYShu/njeoUQhM5Bm32TwEZtPIWEvCJgIr1ObjHnueqRCdhYs+U1Y iNMQvhlnFozWCw5c/1EM5xQSY6/MsrqUGzPmlmCRHz+Zo4lCVAjsFinyA/TRx1B0Ih0a CHCA== X-Received: by 10.152.36.38 with SMTP id n6mr94517laj.0.1403073733641; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.250.57] ([194.100.71.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dn8sm439089lac.31.2014.06.17.23.42.12 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53A134C4.2030205@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:42:12 +0300 From: Jouni Korhonen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radext@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/DNbM0PhZbK7L7VLEnI1t2vTRaLU Subject: [radext] Important dates - IETTF90 geeting close X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 06:42:17 -0000 Folks, Just to remind you.. 4 July: Internet Draft submission - both -00 and revisions. 7 July: WG chairs upload WG agendas. 11 July: Early Bird registration and payment cut-off; the cost to register goes up. 18 July: Last day to pre-register and pre-pay. 20-25 July: 90th IETF Meeting in Toronto, ON, Canada. We have requested one meeting slots. From nobody Wed Jun 18 02:48:27 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40E11A0099 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:48:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CgNqtmU_sTIs for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x230.google.com (mail-la0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5C8F1A0011 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-la0-f48.google.com with SMTP id el20so317615lab.35 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:48:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wgp71iQVbgfozXNdhR+tFc4o8PzDV/l4bHI/dGpdD3w=; b=0M6kpeSpV1oE1ZEn5MGEb/vXaoZ7Hura+jdql6q5d2NnilD8aUQjJcb7fORJcw5NrJ k2vBHZDLYa40g0aMQVJmdxY2CSgxck84i7GtHQo/sxsJoubzvRqmydssBsP5QeO60XRn 1FVduM77fblRQS3nMbpq83yM8eHhSJI0hDV48LOegM92tw9Nv33L+KUUHJ0s8zBhHSOQ zRb6Xq27tL57vdn3xt6cwwI3Nutl/lqQPqFIFqrHnNM/QxDYShtCSGbKK3OE9qULQS0N 1kXRLD+ll9SpAcEUp5UFfTVtZnCBRPzVfJL7XQuQf5zeobQn1FptdefysDyA1haZmPEi dNkA== X-Received: by 10.112.126.38 with SMTP id mv6mr620215lbb.54.1403084901932; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.250.160] ([194.100.71.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id mv10sm1204332lbb.0.2014.06.18.02.48.20 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 02:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53A16064.2000801@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 12:48:20 +0300 From: Jouni Korhonen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radext@ietf.org, aland@deployingradius.com References: <065.18ebd81ae64d013f63a780221f34a543@trac.tools.ietf.org> <080.187563b7a98218620fe0f8797b2665a0@trac.tools.ietf.org> In-Reply-To: <080.187563b7a98218620fe0f8797b2665a0@trac.tools.ietf.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/r_3thNbpAivyki7f78jZOxT1_gQ Subject: Re: [radext] #176 (nai): draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: is the term *Network Access* Identifier still appropriate? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:48:26 -0000 I do not have technical reasoning for my position here but.. Personally I would not start renaming NAI. Quite a few documents refer to RFC4282 and implicitly to this document and it would be confusing to change the name this late. IMHO what matters here is the functionality & technical corrections the I-D provides. If we need to finetune Section 1.1. terminology, let's do it. - Jouni 6/18/2014 12:39 AM, radext issue tracker kirjoitti: > #176: draft-ietf-radext-nai-05: is the term *Network Access* Identifier still > appropriate? > > > Comment (by aland@deployingradius.com): > > I think this requires larger discussion in the WG > From nobody Fri Jun 20 00:17:21 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B2D1A0320; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:17:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.852 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UUqDg50e3Fpz; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:17:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06F831A0243; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BFR06789; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 07:17:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.39) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 08:17:13 +0100 Received: from NKGEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.42]) by nkgeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:17:07 +0800 From: "Fuyu (Eleven)" To: "softwires@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-02.txt Thread-Index: AQHPjFE69TF3L1mML06dNh1KQzPXlJt5i1Gw Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 07:17:06 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.99.25] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/sJi2koOBjxWZCHdoNjQQPhsT1ug Cc: "radext@ietf.org" Subject: [radext] FW: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-02.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 07:17:18 -0000 Hi, Softwirers, The authors have submitted a new version of map radius. As it related to th= e radius, I also cc the radext WG for review. Please review the latest version and give your comments. The below is the s= ummary of modifications we have made: 1: Specify this draft is especially for the MAP-E mechanism, so delete the = Encapsulation/Translation Flag Sub Option. 2: According to the updating MAP dhcp draft, add two new sub option: BR-ip= v6-address sub option, EA-Len sub option=20 3: Several text refines Many thanks and best regards Yu -----Original Message----- From: Softwires [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-d= rafts@ietf.org Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 2:31 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: softwires@ietf.org Subject: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-02.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF. Title : RADIUS Attribute for MAP Authors : Sheng Jiang Yu Fu Bing Liu Peter Deacon Filename : draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-02.txt Pages : 15 Date : 2014-06-19 Abstract: Mapping of Address and Port (MAP) is a stateless mechanism for running IPv4 over IPv6-only infrastructure. It provides both IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity services simultaneously during the IPv4/IPv6 co-existing period. The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) MAP options has been defined to configure MAP Customer Edge (CE). However, in many networks, the configuration information may be stored in Authentication Authorization and Accounting (AAA) servers while user configuration is mainly from Broadband Network Gateway (BNG) through DHCPv6 protocol. This document defines a Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) attribute that carries MAP configuration information from AAA server to BNG. The MAP RADIUS attribute are designed following the simplify principle. It provides just enough information to form the correspondent DHCPv6 MAP option. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires From nobody Tue Jun 24 00:38:16 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC1D1B287C for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:38:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.151 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4XnUVaOT9MQM for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B48601B287B for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53402 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1WzLIa-0001yV-2y; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:37:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 07:37:38 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/182 Message-ID: <065.43aead270fea325624ba7c979c6728de@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 182 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@networkradius.com, alex@um.es, diego@tid.es, gabilm@um.es, pereniguez@um.es Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/9hrsZq-hBoP9TguNn6-SzYJn-ek Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #182 (radius-fragmentation): transport review questions X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 07:38:13 -0000 #182: transport review questions - the document should more clearly distinguish between the limiting sizes of messages at different layers in the stack Although RADIUS uses the term "packet" even for RADIUS-level data (RFC 2965), I'll use the following terms: message - a RADIUS unit of data packet - a UDP unit datagram - an IP unit i.e., a single RADIUS message (up to 4096 bytes) is always sent in a single UDP packet, which may be sent over one or more IP datagrams. Thus RADIUS already relies (heavily, IMO) on IP-level fragmentation and reassembly. E.g., RADIUS specifies a max length of 4096 octets; the field supports the same length as a max IP datagram (65535). The largest IPv4 datagram that is guaranteed to be reassembled is 576 bytes. So RADIUS is already potentially sending UDP packets that can't be reassembled by IPv4. There's nothing I see in RADIUS that reacts to path MTU or even interface MTU. - the need to send "large amounts" of data should be better discussed Even the 100K data limit can generate an excessive burst if the network is congested. See RFC 5405. However, given the stop-and-go (windowsize =1) protocol of exchanging fragments one at a time, this probably isn't an issue - but it should be explained as such. - PMTUD is a red-herring unless RADIUS sets the DF bit That would be a bad idea, IMO, because RADIUS already allows message sizes in excess of the largest safely assumed MTU. There's no good reason to set DF=1 for RADIUS packets - they're not sent at a high enough data rate to have problems with IPv4 ID uniqueness (see RFC 6864). However, RADIUS doesn't appear to set the DF bit, nor is that discussed in this doc, so this is a red herring. - nothing in RADIUS appears to avoid IP fragmentation per se So I don't see why that's being added here. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: radius-fragmentation | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Keywords: Writeup | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Tue Jun 24 07:14:08 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2E21B29D1 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:16:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.551 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y0fffL-8m5Iq for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79B291B29D2 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:16:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36500 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1WzQZe-0006CP-Io; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:15:56 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, aland@deployingradius.com X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:15:16 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/182#comment:1 Message-ID: <080.3093ef27c7c61f369018b68f4fb9e3e5@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <065.43aead270fea325624ba7c979c6728de@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 182 In-Reply-To: <065.43aead270fea325624ba7c979c6728de@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, aland@deployingradius.com, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@networkradius.com, alex@um.es, diego@tid.es, gabilm@um.es, pereniguez@um.es Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/yIVnvxVqksYStY79t_JU2Gj4K6U X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 07:13:52 -0700 Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #182 (radius-fragmentation): transport review questions X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:16:26 -0000 #182: transport review questions Comment (by aland@deployingradius.com): Multiple implementations force the DF bit to be zero. When DF=1, implementations sending large packets get ICMP errors instead of data transport. This is bad. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: radius-fragmentation | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Resolution: Writeup | Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Mon Jun 30 01:59:16 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E601A01A7 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 01:59:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.551 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eh-MP6Lahx4d for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 01:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01C621A0079 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 01:59:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45314 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1X1XQW-0002Fa-05; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 01:59:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, alex@um.es X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:59:03 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/177#comment:1 Message-ID: <080.64250d9baaa1f5dba070c85f9e177e2e@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <065.849dac8b029f671ef52851a446d03857@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 177 In-Reply-To: <065.849dac8b029f671ef52851a446d03857@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, alex@um.es, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@networkradius.com, alex@um.es, diego@tid.es, gabilm@um.es, pereniguez@um.es, rafa@um.es Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/ueD2_FO6sFecoGCykGN1wmJewlU Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #177 (radius-fragmentation): text in section 11.2 up-to-date? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:59:14 -0000 #177: text in section 11.2 up-to-date? Comment (by alex@um.es): You are right. For some reason I forgot adding this improved text Alan provided. So yes, that would be the most updated version, and I'll include it into the upcoming -07 release. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: radius-fragmentation | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Resolution: Writeup | Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Mon Jun 30 02:03:27 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEF31A01AC for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:03:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.551 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jk2shFHrlNNJ for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:03:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 287091A01A7 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:03:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45440 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1X1XUd-0001m3-CM; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:03:19 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, alex@um.es X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:03:19 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/178#comment:1 Message-ID: <080.8296d7ca6a2efd4b176181e2f145b8bb@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <065.3a956fa45a00049e711dbe6a5fb8d6c9@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 178 In-Reply-To: <065.3a956fa45a00049e711dbe6a5fb8d6c9@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, alex@um.es, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@networkradius.com, alex@um.es, diego@tid.es, gabilm@um.es, pereniguez@um.es, rafa@um.es Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/e-TbG2G9uQcck2QnE9OENaHLTeY Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #178 (radius-fragmentation): fragments going in both directions - allowed or not? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:03:25 -0000 #178: fragments going in both directions - allowed or not? Comment (by alex@um.es): Indeed, pre-authorization phase is intended only to allow the NAS sending a large packet to the AS.We don't want the AS to send authorization information until authentication has been completed (post-authorization). Besides, the fragmentation process should be seen as an atomic process, in the sense that when one of the peers is sending fragmented data, the other stop any kind of processing until the sender has completed the delivery. As you say, it is a half-duplex process. I agree a clarification paragraph is required in the introductory text of section 4. In particular, it would be placed as the second paragraph of that section. Also, a minor change on the third paragraph would be required. The final text would be as follows: [...]. The chunks are tied together via the State attribute. The delivery of a large fragmented RADIUS packet with authorization data can happen before or after the end user has been authenticated by the AS. We can distinguish two phases: 1. Pre-authorization. In this phase, the NAS can send a large packet with authorization information to the AS before the end user is authenticated. 2. Post-authorization. In this phase, the AS can send a large packet with authorization data to the NAS after the end user has been authenticated. The following subsections describe how to perform fragmentation for packets for these two phases, pre-authorization and post-authorization. [...] -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: radius-fragmentation | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Resolution: Writeup | Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Mon Jun 30 02:05:58 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE711A01B0 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:05:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.551 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G3zR0BAN8_gD for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC5B71A01AE for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45581 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1X1XX3-0003CH-1U; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:05:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, alex@um.es X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:05:48 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/179#comment:2 Message-ID: <080.fc03245a97c1ab44291dbcd2600eb6bd@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <065.e68e62499c1428e7ab8f6e73087bad4c@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 179 In-Reply-To: <065.e68e62499c1428e7ab8f6e73087bad4c@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, alex@um.es, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@networkradius.com, alex@um.es, diego@tid.es, gabilm@um.es, pereniguez@um.es, rafa@um.es Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/q_EzMUilEfk7D8QMeylHEdo4QtI Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #179 (radius-fragmentation): draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-06: IANA considerations X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:05:58 -0000 #179: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-06: IANA considerations Comment (by alex@um.es): That's right. Besides, there was an errata, as the text said "RADIUS messages" where it should have stated "RADIUS attributes" instead. This new text for the IANA consderations section is based on RFC 5226 suggestions: The authors request that Attribute Types and Attribute Values defined in this document be registered by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) from the RADIUS namespaces as described in the "IANA Considerations" section of [RFC3575], in accordance with BCP 26 [RFC5226]. For RADIUS packets, attributes and registries created by this document IANA is requested to place them at http://www.iana.org/assignments/radius-types. In particular, this document defines two new RADIUS attributes, entitled "Frag-Status" and "Proxy-State-Len" (see section 9), assigned values of TBD1 and TBD2 from the Long Extended Space of [RFC2865]: Tag Name Length Meaning ---- ---- ------ ------- TBD1 Frag-Status 7 Signals fragmentation TBD2 Proxy-State-Len 7 Indicates the length of the received Proxy-State attributes The Frag-Status attribute also defines a 8-bit "Code" field, for which the IANA is to create and maintain a new sub-registry entitled "Code values" under the RADIUS "Frag-Status" attribute. Initial values for the RADIUS Frag-Status "Code" registry are given below; future assignments are to be made through "RFC required" [IANA- CONSIDERATIONS]. Assignments consist of a Frag-Status "Code" name and its associated value. Value Frag-Status Code Name Definition ---- ------------------------ ---------- 0 Reserved See Section 9.1 1 Fragmentation-Supported See Section 9.1 2 More-Data-Pending See Section 9.1 3 More-Data-Request See Section 9.1 4-255 Unassigned Additionally, allocation of a new Service-Type value for "Additional- Authorization" is requested. Value Service Type Value Definition ---- ------------------------ ---------- TBA Additional-Authorization See section 4.1 -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: radius-fragmentation | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Resolution: Writeup | Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Mon Jun 30 02:14:07 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8A71A01C0 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:14:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.551 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id clCypAKv7ePp for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD3871A01AE for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45896 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1X1Xez-0007sx-AY; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:14:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, alex@um.es X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:14:01 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/180#comment:1 Message-ID: <080.cd124ab74ac33eb3ddc8c8cffaf3e2c3@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <065.fe6830fb6d900ff63bd95d61218553db@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 180 In-Reply-To: <065.fe6830fb6d900ff63bd95d61218553db@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, alex@um.es, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@networkradius.com, alex@um.es, diego@tid.es, gabilm@um.es, pereniguez@um.es, rafa@um.es Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/0FUNeRQrewMOnPA6va8eypNZtHA Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #180 (radius-fragmentation): draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-06: mop-up of small comments X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:14:06 -0000 #180: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-06: mop-up of small comments Comment (by alex@um.es): Thanks. We'll address them in the upcoming -07 version. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: radius-fragmentation | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Resolution: Writeup | Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Mon Jun 30 02:15:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126BB1A01C0 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:15:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.551 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yqj89Szh8yMe for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C73CD1A01AE for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45940 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1X1Xg5-0002Ex-3M; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 02:15:09 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, alex@um.es X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:15:09 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/181#comment:1 Message-ID: <080.6fe6a6cdac7cdb90146947651651aed6@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <065.9cf0de107a5a20b43d8717fb106e5469@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 181 In-Reply-To: <065.9cf0de107a5a20b43d8717fb106e5469@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org, alex@um.es, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: aland@networkradius.com, alex@um.es, diego@tid.es, gabilm@um.es, pereniguez@um.es, rafa@um.es Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/radext/fiotP8pt3Snl5LazvOjcxjY8S-Q Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #181 (radius-fragmentation): MUST vs. configurable X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:15:14 -0000 #181: MUST vs. configurable Comment (by alex@um.es): Yes, that's exactly what we wanted to express. We will reword it as you suggest. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | radius-fragmentation@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: radius-fragmentation | Version: Severity: Waiting for Shepherd | Resolution: Writeup | Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext