From nobody Wed Dec 9 10:09:05 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietf.org Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213BA1B2B9F; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:09:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151209180902.16626.14755.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 10:09:02 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets-05.txt X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 18:09:02 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the RADIUS EXTensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : Larger Packets for RADIUS over TCP Author : Sam Hartman Filename : draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets-05.txt Pages : 9 Date : 2015-12-09 Abstract: The RADIUS over TLS experiment described in RFC 6614 has opened RADIUS to new use cases where the 4096-octet maximum size limit of RADIUS packet proves problematic. This specification extends the RADIUS over TCP experiment (RFC 6613) to permit larger RADIUS packets. This specification compliments other ongoing work to permit fragmentation of RADIUS authorization information. This document registers a new RADIUS code, an action which requires IESG approval. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Wed Dec 9 10:21:50 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD4C1B2C40 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:21:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.597 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sKB5d2WAVXHZ for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:21:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.networkradius.com (unknown [62.210.147.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5ADE1B2C2D for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:21:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2CE1393 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 18:21:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.networkradius.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail-server.networkradius.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EH6k1pb5CeSg for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 18:21:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.20.14] (69-196-165-104.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.165.104]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4258936B for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 18:21:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Alan DeKok Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 13:21:44 -0500 To: radext@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Archived-At: Subject: [radext] Call for WG document adoption X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 18:21:49 -0000 Any updates? Lionel wrote: > After a detailed check, it seems that I had an issue with my email = account during the summer break (and even after) and that some of my = emails were not correctly distributed on the RADEXT mailing list. > > To repeat what was agreed at the last IETF meeting, the following = drafts are (more than) candidates as WG documents: > - draft-dekok-radext-coa-proxy-00.txt > - draft-winter-radext-populating-eapidentity-01 > > Both items are already part of the new charter. > Support for both was already expressed on the mailing list and during = the meeting. > > Therefore, if no concern is raised before November, Monday 7, I will = (finally) confirm the adoption of these drafts as WG documents.=20= From nobody Thu Dec 17 04:43:40 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783E41B2C06 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:43:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HScADoTgvxKz for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:43:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56CFC1B2B5B for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:43:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54060 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1a9Xu9-0007nK-Ks; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:43:33 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:43:33 -0000 X-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/192#comment:2 Message-ID: <081.e14f4e5a68dfb53b0c254d6a60fe2584@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.011a2b896e05688e347bba116479f04a@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 192 In-Reply-To: <066.011a2b896e05688e347bba116479f04a@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20151217124337.56CFC1B2B5B@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:43:37 -0800 (PST) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Archived-At: Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #192 (bigger-packets): unclear meaning of "configured categories" of dynamically discovered servers X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:43:38 -0000 #192: unclear meaning of "configured categories" of dynamically discovered servers Comment (by stefan.winter@restena.lu): text resolving this issue was provided in -06. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: bigger-packets | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Thu Dec 17 04:43:45 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FA81B2C1B for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:43:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hX1GtU06AfSp for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:43:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B94651B2C14 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:43:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54067 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1a9XuG-0007ng-HL; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:43:40 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:43:40 -0000 X-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/192#comment:3 Message-ID: <081.7dcc796cf0de602e1d4c95446f5f05d7@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.011a2b896e05688e347bba116479f04a@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 192 In-Reply-To: <066.011a2b896e05688e347bba116479f04a@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20151217124340.B94651B2C14@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:43:40 -0800 (PST) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Archived-At: Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #192 (bigger-packets): unclear meaning of "configured categories" of dynamically discovered servers X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:43:42 -0000 #192: unclear meaning of "configured categories" of dynamically discovered servers Changes (by stefan.winter@restena.lu): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: bigger-packets | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Thu Dec 17 04:52:57 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26DE1A3BA4 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:52:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UcyuSsclT3ZD for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:52:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DB101A1EE8 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:52:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54299 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1a9Y3C-0007H6-3v; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:52:54 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:52:54 -0000 X-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://rsync3.xml.resource.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/196#comment:1 Message-ID: <081.290b72f5bbf483320542d6ada4811ac2@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.4371af80d88c7a741f3eed11eaeba3b6@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 196 In-Reply-To: <066.4371af80d88c7a741f3eed11eaeba3b6@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20151217125254.8DB101A1EE8@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:52:54 -0800 (PST) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Archived-At: Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #196 (bigger-packets): change data type of Resonse-Length X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:52:55 -0000 #196: change data type of Resonse-Length Changes (by stefan.winter@restena.lu): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: data type was changed in -05 -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: bigger-packets | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Thu Dec 17 04:54:39 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E41D1B29EB for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:54:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6noQAGbKoJrm for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:54:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D5201B2A01 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:54:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54396 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1a9Y4l-0008Ji-Vg; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:54:32 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:54:31 -0000 X-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/195#comment:4 Message-ID: <081.079bcd21bb3c3f9ba86f16639c568a29@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.effca4de2c03b757436f11e214664110@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 195 In-Reply-To: <066.effca4de2c03b757436f11e214664110@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20151217125432.3D5201B2A01@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:54:32 -0800 (PST) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Archived-At: Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #195 (bigger-packets): minor nits X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:54:38 -0000 #195: minor nits Changes (by stefan.winter@restena.lu): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: The remaining ones are fixed in -05 -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: bigger-packets | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Thu Dec 17 04:57:16 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7DB1B2C35 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:57:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uDGvH7RaRoMP for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:57:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F93C1B2C28 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:57:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54567 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1a9Y7F-0000oL-U4; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:57:05 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:57:05 -0000 X-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/191#comment:2 Message-ID: <081.37da6f8c2a7aee99b8fc243703cc2769@trac.tools.ietf.org> References: <066.630eaeb39ad455d9420cf40608e37b5c@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 191 In-Reply-To: <066.630eaeb39ad455d9420cf40608e37b5c@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20151217125706.2F93C1B2C28@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:57:06 -0800 (PST) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Archived-At: Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: Re: [radext] #191 (bigger-packets): Is evaluation of backwards compatibility part of the experiment's goals? X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:57:14 -0000 #191: Is evaluation of backwards compatibility part of the experiment's goals? Changes (by stefan.winter@restena.lu): * status: new => closed * resolution: => worksforme Comment: There doesn't seem to be much interest in this particular topic any more. Considering that a future move to standards track would unify the contents of 6613 and this draft, which makes the backward compatibility question moot, it seems that the document can go out as-is. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: bigger-packets | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: worksforme Keywords: | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Thu Dec 17 05:14:54 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A89D1B2BBE for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 05:14:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id csNMt47XWdOv for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 05:14:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCAF71B2BAA for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 05:14:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54919 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1a9YOR-0004bd-Jh; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 05:14:51 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "radext issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.5 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.5, by Edgewall Software To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu X-Trac-Project: radext Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:14:51 -0000 X-URL: https://tools.ietf.org/radext/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/radext/trac/ticket/197 Message-ID: <066.c80912806059cac04d81d7d5f8c61136@trac.tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 197 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, radext@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Resent-To: draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20151217131451.CCAF71B2BAA@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 05:14:51 -0800 (PST) Resent-From: trac+radext@trac.tools.ietf.org Archived-At: Cc: radext@ietf.org Subject: [radext] #197 (bigger-packets): idnits comments for resolution with other IETF LC comments X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: radext@ietf.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:14:53 -0000 #197: idnits comments for resolution with other IETF LC comments These items are rather small and don't require an update before sending the document to IETF LC. They were found during the final idnits check which is required as per write-up procedures. The comments should be cleared together with IETF LC comments, if any, or in any case before publication. * Updates: header is for RFC6613 and 6614. Nothing in the text actually changes anything in RFC6614; the text even explicitly states: "This specification updates [RFC6613] and will be used with [RFC6614]." Being-used-with does not really warrant an "Updates" relationship. * There is a "SHOULD not" (missing capitalisation of the NOT): "By default, a server SHOULD not generate a response larger than 4096 octets." * Outdated reference: A later version (-13) exists of draft-ietf-abfab- aaa-saml-09 -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-radext- stefan.winter@restena.lu | bigger-packets@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: bigger-packets | Version: Severity: - | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: radext From nobody Wed Dec 23 01:58:00 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033071ACE33 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 01:57:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ToFZSLi_3P3p for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 01:57:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 334BE1ACE32 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 01:57:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by omfedm11.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id DB0993B4358; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:57:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.2]) by omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id B4D4B23806B; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:57:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::ec23:902:c31f:731c]) by OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e92a:c932:907e:8f06%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:57:54 +0100 From: To: "radext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Call for WG document adoption Thread-Index: AdEVc0QAOhnOF0wgRyief1wu4KzHcAn8w2UA Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:57:54 +0000 Message-ID: <14532_1450864674_567A7022_14532_47_5_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E01D93993@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: fr-FR X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.12.9.132716 Archived-At: Cc: Kathleen Moriarty , Stephen Farrell Subject: Re: [radext] Call for WG document adoption X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 09:57:59 -0000 Hi, The following documents are adopted as working group documents: - draft-dekok-radext-coa-proxy-00.txt - draft-winter-radext-populating-eapidentity-01 As a reminder, adopting a draft as working group document indicates that th= ere is sufficient interest within the working group to work on the topic id= entified in the draft and there is enough people willing to contribute on t= his document. The working group document becomes a placeholder for such a contribution. I= t does mean that the actual content is endorsed by the working group. Regards, Lionel -----Message d'origine----- De=A0: MORAND Lionel IMT/OLN=20 Envoy=E9=A0: lundi 2 novembre 2015 14:55 =C0=A0: radext@ietf.org Cc=A0: 'Kathleen Moriarty'; Stephen Farrell Objet=A0: Call for WG document adoption Hi After a detailed check, it seems that I had an issue with my email account = during the summer break (and even after) and that some of my emails were no= t correctly distributed on the RADEXT mailing list. To repeat what was agreed at the last IETF meeting, the following drafts ar= e (more than) candidates as WG documents: - draft-dekok-radext-coa-proxy-00.txt - draft-winter-radext-populating-eapidentity-01 Both items are already part of the new charter. Support for both was already expressed on the mailing list and during the m= eeting. Therefore, if no concern is raised before November, Monday 7, I will (final= ly) confirm the adoption of these drafts as WG documents.=20 Sorry for this mess! Regards, Lionel ___________________________________________________________________________= ______________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden= tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu= ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages el= ectroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou = falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf= ormation that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele= te this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been = modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.