From nobody Fri Dec 9 11:01:18 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@virtual.ietf.org Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E1E4712953D; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:01:15 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEB4129657 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:01:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vDtmQF-G0Nf for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:01:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp01.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.46.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58AE112953D for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:01:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp01.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BE0E1657; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:01:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 68943C204EE; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 19:01:13 +0000 (UTC) RT-Owner: amanda.baber From: "Amanda Baber via RT" In-Reply-To: <147854394645.7294.9903452807987765582.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <147854394645.7294.9903452807987765582.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Message-ID: X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA X-RT-Ticket: IANA #935820 X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/) X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Precedence: bulk Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 19:01:13 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Resent-From: Resent-To: dean.cheng@huawei.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, ssenthil@cisco.com, stefan.winter@restena.lu, lionel.morand@orange.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, radext@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20161209190115.E1E4712953D@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:01:15 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, aland@deployingradius.com, lionel.morand@orange.com Subject: [radext] [IANA #935820] Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17.txt) X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: drafts-approval@iana.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 19:01:16 -0000 Kathleen and Lionel, This is a reminder that draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17 will remain in our queue until we receive your confirmation that the new registry being created by Section 7.3 is OK. When the document was approved, Section 7.3 was already telling us to make these registrations, but didn't identify the registry. thanks, Amanda On Thu Nov 17 01:02:12 2016, amanda.baber wrote: > Lionel and Kathleen, > > Can you confirm that the new registry introduced in Section 7.3 of > draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17 is OK? > > thanks, > Amanda > > On Wed Nov 16 07:50:50 2016, stefan.winter@restena.lu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was planning to leave this to Lionel as he is the doc shepherd. > > > > Stefan > > > > Zitat von Amanda Baber via RT : > > > > > Kathleen, Lionel, Stefan, > > > > > > Re-sending this approval request. I apologize for pinging after > > > only > > > one day. > > > > > > thanks, > > > Amanda > > > > > > On Tue Nov 15 05:05:27 2016, amanda.baber wrote: > > >> Kathleen, Lionel, Stefan, > > >> > > >> The authors of draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext have uploaded > > >> a > > >> new version that creates a registry called "RADIUS IP Port > > >> Configuration and Reporting TLVs" in Section 7.3. > > >> > > >> The previous version of Section 7.3 had asked us to make the same > > >> registrations without identifying the registry they belonged in. > > >> > > >> Can you confirm that this new registry is OK? > > >> > > >> thanks, > > >> > > >> Amanda Baber > > >> Lead IANA Services Specialist > > >> PTI From nobody Mon Dec 12 07:56:05 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@virtual.ietf.org Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 3740E129CD4; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:56:03 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBF01295A9 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:56:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5HJc3GxbGPlp for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:56:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qt0-x242.google.com (mail-qt0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAFC5129CF6 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:55:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt0-x242.google.com with SMTP id l20so10314142qta.1 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:55:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=7+cf+e3DzW9y8MkFU+15qv87wZtSFF2VitX00VW68ys=; b=r0Xa6GYtYs4bzP4N14yQ21Jk7Ds73jOIkzLhA/nCUIGH/FV3zggWHHJjrmUtr7OAgk 4kvfMnSxPqs8yY8qT6S5kint7u3o3LWd7eTjcJFWXjVmQ0gr9gAVmoO40u0dB8DLSrdm bB6DTYSlNB16PuwcBDhGnoQYaXBmjGgp1Ao9TZFSNleR7tGi8SAKzMczMUVibLg2D0s3 qOd1O1doxJZYhWL5EmF06SSRnv8paJyop54QQdV2w8wJUjUi5DkmZerQULG4v75hv+aY HHMU9z8ueNz6KOHvu6eQzyLinpLzsbt865kZbEdahkL9Ybm0Yq8hBuozXaXTj9CyTyaq Ddxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=7+cf+e3DzW9y8MkFU+15qv87wZtSFF2VitX00VW68ys=; b=MfckwuMGkHHTkwt90kQD+e1cBxtFp6PYn08sD/7ESNxTXzB/+2eANefy1lxn6dwsnK /rU61JhPjvBqEcVYRhN13dfO7cyHeG2+WkulRf6Im1fX7gTMJJKR4AL0QlU+VVxDsIRz sming++D/ngD7kEi23Fc0IPpj7qdBacxTNdBpueFBiJubU3eqpyUxt7GKvak86wpRkLL CSUlqRal1HNS2EDOvGhDyGd8uJEMXQ4m+2Go5BtOSw4sBHewI9z/Ln0roeD3I8P9PsLm GEgRanoPLVZ74KE4ahOcGiRTEBQKWjhOXGxccDgZa2Yfxwlx190GlxUmmMMak+ELuJKa tanA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00y48dxOlSIXHtWNCUSDyBcHcufg0h22S/zrSm2KtKUgitlX33A1T+s+73dUuxdjQ== X-Received: by 10.237.39.37 with SMTP id n34mr82122864qtd.128.1481558119794; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:55:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.255.15.72] (207-172-76-91.ma.subnet.cable.rcn.com. [207.172.76.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h47sm26806961qtc.27.2016.12.12.07.55.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:55:19 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14B100) In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:55:18 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3595A98B-D149-46EF-8196-A175E21B20FA@gmail.com> References: <147854394645.7294.9903452807987765582.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: drafts-approval@iana.org Resent-From: Resent-To: dean.cheng@huawei.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, ssenthil@cisco.com, stefan.winter@restena.lu, lionel.morand@orange.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, radext@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20161212155603.3740E129CD4@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:56:03 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, aland@deployingradius.com, lionel.morand@orange.com Subject: Re: [radext] [IANA #935820] Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17.txt) X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:56:03 -0000 Hello Amanda, Yes, but please wait for Lionel's response as well. This message wasn't com= ing to my attention until someone pinged me on it and I'm wondering if the s= ame thing happened to Lionel's email. Thank you, Kathleen=20 Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device=20 > On Dec 9, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Amanda Baber via RT = wrote: >=20 > Kathleen and Lionel, >=20 > This is a reminder that draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17 will remai= n in our queue until we receive your confirmation that the new registry bein= g created by Section 7.3 is OK. >=20 > When the document was approved, Section 7.3 was already telling us to make= these registrations, but didn't identify the registry.=20 >=20 > thanks, > Amanda >=20 >> On Thu Nov 17 01:02:12 2016, amanda.baber wrote: >> Lionel and Kathleen, >>=20 >> Can you confirm that the new registry introduced in Section 7.3 of >> draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17 is OK? >>=20 >> thanks, >> Amanda >>=20 >>> On Wed Nov 16 07:50:50 2016, stefan.winter@restena.lu wrote: >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> I was planning to leave this to Lionel as he is the doc shepherd. >>>=20 >>> Stefan >>>=20 >>> Zitat von Amanda Baber via RT : >>>=20 >>>> Kathleen, Lionel, Stefan, >>>>=20 >>>> Re-sending this approval request. I apologize for pinging after >>>> only >>>> one day. >>>>=20 >>>> thanks, >>>> Amanda >>>>=20 >>>>> On Tue Nov 15 05:05:27 2016, amanda.baber wrote: >>>>> Kathleen, Lionel, Stefan, >>>>>=20 >>>>> The authors of draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext have uploaded >>>>> a >>>>> new version that creates a registry called "RADIUS IP Port >>>>> Configuration and Reporting TLVs" in Section 7.3. >>>>>=20 >>>>> The previous version of Section 7.3 had asked us to make the same >>>>> registrations without identifying the registry they belonged in. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Can you confirm that this new registry is OK? >>>>>=20 >>>>> thanks, >>>>>=20 >>>>> Amanda Baber >>>>> Lead IANA Services Specialist >>>>> PTI From nobody Mon Dec 12 08:33:54 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@virtual.ietf.org Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 39D76129D6D; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:33:53 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C4C129D49 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:33:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.515 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M-owQ80T0mPR for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:33:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta134.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BA27129DB6 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:29:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from opfednr02.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.66]) by opfednr22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id BABDC2041B; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:29:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.60]) by opfednr02.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 84BEB12006D; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:29:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::ec23:902:c31f:731c]) by OPEXCLILM7F.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::c1d7:e278:e357:11ad%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:29:48 +0100 From: To: "kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com" , "drafts-approval@iana.org" Thread-Topic: [IANA #935820] Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17.txt) Thread-Index: AQHSUk6eqawEhR+T+UGFeHkjlqOHPKEEauQAgAAZiqA= Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:29:47 +0000 Message-ID: <28733_1481560188_584ED07C_28733_560_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E0BFA8A48@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <147854394645.7294.9903452807987765582.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3595A98B-D149-46EF-8196-A175E21B20FA@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3595A98B-D149-46EF-8196-A175E21B20FA@gmail.com> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: fr-FR X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.3] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Resent-From: Resent-To: dean.cheng@huawei.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, ssenthil@cisco.com, stefan.winter@restena.lu, lionel.morand@orange.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, radext@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20161212163353.39D76129D6D@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:33:53 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org" , "stefan.winter@restena.lu" , "aland@deployingradius.com" Subject: Re: [radext] [IANA #935820] Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17.txt) X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:33:53 -0000 Thank you, Kathleen! Same issue for me. Sorry. I'm OK... even if there is "maybe" a typo in the name of the registry: s/RADIUS IP Port Configuraion and Reporting TLVs/RADIUS IP Port Configurati= on and Reporting TLVs :) Regards, Lionel > -----Message d'origine----- > De=A0: kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com > [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com] > Envoy=E9=A0: lundi 12 d=E9cembre 2016 16:55 > =C0=A0: drafts-approval@iana.org > Cc=A0: MORAND Lionel IMT/OLN; aland@deployingradius.com; draft-ietf-radex= t- > ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org; stefan.winter@restena.lu > Objet=A0: Re: [IANA #935820] Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Extensions for IP P= ort > Configuration and Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-radext-ip-p= ort- > radius-ext-17.txt) >=20 > Hello Amanda, >=20 > Yes, but please wait for Lionel's response as well. This message wasn't = coming > to my attention until someone pinged me on it and I'm wondering if the sa= me > thing happened to Lionel's email. >=20 > Thank you, > Kathleen >=20 > Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device >=20 > > On Dec 9, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Amanda Baber via RT > wrote: > > > > Kathleen and Lionel, > > > > This is a reminder that draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17 will re= main in our > queue until we receive your confirmation that the new registry being crea= ted by > Section 7.3 is OK. > > > > When the document was approved, Section 7.3 was already telling us to m= ake > these registrations, but didn't identify the registry. > > > > thanks, > > Amanda > > > >> On Thu Nov 17 01:02:12 2016, amanda.baber wrote: > >> Lionel and Kathleen, > >> > >> Can you confirm that the new registry introduced in Section 7.3 of > >> draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17 is OK? > >> > >> thanks, > >> Amanda > >> > >>> On Wed Nov 16 07:50:50 2016, stefan.winter@restena.lu wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I was planning to leave this to Lionel as he is the doc shepherd. > >>> > >>> Stefan > >>> > >>> Zitat von Amanda Baber via RT : > >>> > >>>> Kathleen, Lionel, Stefan, > >>>> > >>>> Re-sending this approval request. I apologize for pinging after > >>>> only one day. > >>>> > >>>> thanks, > >>>> Amanda > >>>> > >>>>> On Tue Nov 15 05:05:27 2016, amanda.baber wrote: > >>>>> Kathleen, Lionel, Stefan, > >>>>> > >>>>> The authors of draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext have uploaded > >>>>> a new version that creates a registry called "RADIUS IP Port > >>>>> Configuration and Reporting TLVs" in Section 7.3. > >>>>> > >>>>> The previous version of Section 7.3 had asked us to make the same > >>>>> registrations without identifying the registry they belonged in. > >>>>> > >>>>> Can you confirm that this new registry is OK? > >>>>> > >>>>> thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>> Amanda Baber > >>>>> Lead IANA Services Specialist > >>>>> PTI ___________________________________________________________________________= ______________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden= tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu= ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages el= ectroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou = falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf= ormation that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele= te this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been = modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. From nobody Mon Dec 12 10:27:58 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@virtual.ietf.org Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E8B1012949A; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:27:56 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C719A12946B for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:27:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uwUgTk21ojvO for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:27:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp01.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.46.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7948112949A for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:27:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp01.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812C2E1810; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 49570C20539; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:27:53 +0000 (UTC) RT-Owner: amanda.baber From: "Amanda Baber via RT" In-Reply-To: References: <147854394645.7294.9903452807987765582.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3595A98B-D149-46EF-8196-A175E21B20FA@gmail.com> <28733_1481560188_584ED07C_28733_560_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E0BFA8A48@OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA X-RT-Ticket: IANA #935820 X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/) X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Precedence: bulk Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:27:53 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Resent-From: Resent-To: dean.cheng@huawei.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, ssenthil@cisco.com, stefan.winter@restena.lu, lionel.morand@orange.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, radext@ietf.org Resent-Message-Id: <20161212182756.E8B1012949A@ietfa.amsl.com> Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:27:56 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: Cc: lionel.morand@orange.com, draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org, stefan.winter@restena.lu, aland@deployingradius.com, kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [radext] [IANA #935820] Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17.txt) X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Reply-To: drafts-approval@iana.org List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:27:57 -0000 Thanks! I'll send a note to the RFC Editor. Amanda On Mon Dec 12 16:30:11 2016, lionel.morand@orange.com wrote: > Thank you, Kathleen! Same issue for me. Sorry. > > I'm OK... even if there is "maybe" a typo in the name of the registry: > s/RADIUS IP Port Configuraion and Reporting TLVs/RADIUS IP Port > Configuration and Reporting TLVs > > :) > > Regards, > > Lionel > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com > > [mailto:kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com] > > Envoyé : lundi 12 décembre 2016 16:55 > > À : drafts-approval@iana.org > > Cc : MORAND Lionel IMT/OLN; aland@deployingradius.com; draft-ietf- > > radext- > > ip-port-radius-ext.all@ietf.org; stefan.winter@restena.lu > > Objet : Re: [IANA #935820] Protocol Action: 'RADIUS Extensions for IP > > Port > > Configuration and Reporting' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-radext- > > ip-port- > > radius-ext-17.txt) > > > > Hello Amanda, > > > > Yes, but please wait for Lionel's response as well. This message > > wasn't coming > > to my attention until someone pinged me on it and I'm wondering if > > the same > > thing happened to Lionel's email. > > > > Thank you, > > Kathleen > > > > Please excuse typos, sent from handheld device > > > > > On Dec 9, 2016, at 2:01 PM, Amanda Baber via RT > > approval@iana.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > Kathleen and Lionel, > > > > > > This is a reminder that draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17 > > > will remain in our > > queue until we receive your confirmation that the new registry being > > created by > > Section 7.3 is OK. > > > > > > When the document was approved, Section 7.3 was already telling us > > > to make > > these registrations, but didn't identify the registry. > > > > > > thanks, > > > Amanda > > > > > >> On Thu Nov 17 01:02:12 2016, amanda.baber wrote: > > >> Lionel and Kathleen, > > >> > > >> Can you confirm that the new registry introduced in Section 7.3 of > > >> draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext-17 is OK? > > >> > > >> thanks, > > >> Amanda > > >> > > >>> On Wed Nov 16 07:50:50 2016, stefan.winter@restena.lu wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> I was planning to leave this to Lionel as he is the doc shepherd. > > >>> > > >>> Stefan > > >>> > > >>> Zitat von Amanda Baber via RT : > > >>> > > >>>> Kathleen, Lionel, Stefan, > > >>>> > > >>>> Re-sending this approval request. I apologize for pinging after > > >>>> only one day. > > >>>> > > >>>> thanks, > > >>>> Amanda > > >>>> > > >>>>> On Tue Nov 15 05:05:27 2016, amanda.baber wrote: > > >>>>> Kathleen, Lionel, Stefan, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The authors of draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext have > > >>>>> uploaded > > >>>>> a new version that creates a registry called "RADIUS IP Port > > >>>>> Configuration and Reporting TLVs" in Section 7.3. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The previous version of Section 7.3 had asked us to make the > > >>>>> same > > >>>>> registrations without identifying the registry they belonged > > >>>>> in. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Can you confirm that this new registry is OK? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> thanks, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Amanda Baber > > >>>>> Lead IANA Services Specialist > > >>>>> PTI > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez > recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les > messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, > deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or > privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and > delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have > been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. From nobody Mon Dec 12 11:05:07 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietf.org Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3945D1296A4; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:05:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: , , , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.39.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <148156950522.16520.2945087781994604732.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:05:05 -0800 From: IETF Secretariat Archived-At: Subject: [radext] ID Tracker State Update Notice: X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:05:05 -0000 IANA action state changed to In Progress ID Tracker URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext/ From nobody Mon Dec 12 11:05:10 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietf.org Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE631296C5; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:05:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: , , , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.39.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <148156950604.16520.17999714153719895251.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:05:06 -0800 From: IETF Secretariat Archived-At: Subject: [radext] ID Tracker State Update Notice: X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:05:06 -0000 IANA action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor ID Tracker URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext/ From nobody Mon Dec 12 13:05:07 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: radext@ietf.org Delivered-To: radext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF7D1297B8; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:05:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: , , , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.39.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <148157670589.30290.4798893950389133033.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:05:05 -0800 From: IETF Secretariat Archived-At: Subject: [radext] ID Tracker State Update Notice: X-BeenThere: radext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: RADIUS EXTensions working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 21:05:06 -0000 IANA action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack ID Tracker URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-ip-port-radius-ext/