From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 7 14:16:08 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA6912960D for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:16:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ACDVGjOBHj_k for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:16:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9638312953D for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:16:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CB8B81991; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:16:01 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0C77CB81990; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:16:00 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170307221600.0C77CB81990@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:16:00 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8083 on Multimedia Congestion Control: Circuit Breakers for Unicast RTP Sessions X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, avt@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8083 Title: Multimedia Congestion Control: Circuit Breakers for Unicast RTP Sessions Author: C. Perkins, V. Singh Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: csp@csperkins.org, varun@callstats.io Pages: 25 Characters: 67197 Updates: RFC 3550 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-circuit-breakers-18.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8083 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8083 The Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) is widely used in telephony, video conferencing, and telepresence applications. Such applications are often run on best-effort UDP/IP networks. If congestion control is not implemented in these applications, then network congestion can lead to uncontrolled packet loss and a resulting deterioration of the user's multimedia experience. The congestion control algorithm acts as a safety measure by stopping RTP flows from using excessive resources and protecting the network from overload. At the time of this writing, however, while there are several proprietary solutions, there is no standard algorithm for congestion control of interactive RTP flows. This document does not propose a congestion control algorithm. It instead defines a minimal set of RTP circuit breakers: conditions under which an RTP sender needs to stop transmitting media data to protect the network from excessive congestion. It is expected that, in the absence of long-lived excessive congestion, RTP applications running on best-effort IP networks will be able to operate without triggering these circuit breakers. To avoid triggering the RTP circuit breaker, any Standards Track congestion control algorithms defined for RTP will need to operate within the envelope set by these RTP circuit breaker algorithms. This document is a product of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 7 14:16:47 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F64C129618 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:16:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OKukoGK1hdDC for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:16:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EADE129604 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:16:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DD3B8199B; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:16:21 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 58687B81999; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:16:20 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170307221620.58687B81999@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:16:20 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] BCP 208, RFC 8084 on Network Transport Circuit Breakers X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 208 RFC 8084 Title: Network Transport Circuit Breakers Author: G. Fairhurst Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk Pages: 24 Characters: 61712 See Also: BCP 208 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-15.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8084 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8084 This document explains what is meant by the term "network transport Circuit Breaker". It describes the need for Circuit Breakers (CBs) for network tunnels and applications when using non-congestion- controlled traffic and explains where CBs are, and are not, needed. It also defines requirements for building a CB and the expected outcomes of using a CB within the Internet. This document is a product of the Transport Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 7 14:17:42 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549DC129604 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:17:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FY9QvfzEqzKn for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:17:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CCAE129517 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:17:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3096B819A4; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:17:38 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3DBA1B819A0; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:17:37 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170307221737.3DBA1B819A0@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:17:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] BCP 145, RFC 8085 on UDP Usage Guidelines X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 145 RFC 8085 Title: UDP Usage Guidelines Author: L. Eggert, G. Fairhurst, G. Shepherd Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: lars@netapp.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, gjshep@gmail.com Pages: 55 Characters: 145359 Obsoletes: RFC 5405 See Also: BCP 145 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-19.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8085 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8085 The User Datagram Protocol (UDP) provides a minimal message-passing transport that has no inherent congestion control mechanisms. This document provides guidelines on the use of UDP for the designers of applications, tunnels, and other protocols that use UDP. Congestion control guidelines are a primary focus, but the document also provides guidance on other topics, including message sizes, reliability, checksums, middlebox traversal, the use of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN), Differentiated Services Code Points (DSCPs), and ports. Because congestion control is critical to the stable operation of the Internet, applications and other protocols that choose to use UDP as an Internet transport must employ mechanisms to prevent congestion collapse and to establish some degree of fairness with concurrent traffic. They may also need to implement additional mechanisms, depending on how they use UDP. Some guidance is also applicable to the design of other protocols (e.g., protocols layered directly on IP or via IP-based tunnels), especially when these protocols do not themselves provide congestion control. This document obsoletes RFC 5405 and adds guidelines for multicast UDP usage. This document is a product of the Transport Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 7 14:18:14 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D4512961E for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CvYRhQSldlDA for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E10DF129634 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CA8B819AD; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:05 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0A9E0B819AB; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:04 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170307221804.0A9E0B819AB@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8086 on GRE-in-UDP Encapsulation X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8086 Title: GRE-in-UDP Encapsulation Author: L. Yong, Ed., E. Crabbe, X. Xu, T. Herbert Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: lucy.yong@huawei.com, edward.crabbe@gmail.com, xuxiaohu@huawei.com, tom@herbertland.com Pages: 27 Characters: 58743 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap-19.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8086 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8086 This document specifies a method of encapsulating network protocol packets within GRE and UDP headers. This GRE-in-UDP encapsulation allows the UDP source port field to be used as an entropy field. This may be used for load-balancing of GRE traffic in transit networks using existing Equal-Cost Multipath (ECMP) mechanisms. There are two applicability scenarios for GRE-in-UDP with different requirements: (1) general Internet and (2) a traffic-managed controlled environment. The controlled environment has less restrictive requirements than the general Internet. This document is a product of the Transport Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 7 14:18:38 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E71E129655 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mtERNyFNnmyc for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55D1E12964C for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15C1B819B4; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:16 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 387A5B819B3; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:15 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170307221815.387A5B819B3@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8087 on The Benefits of Using Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, aqm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8087 Title: The Benefits of Using Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Author: G. Fairhurst, M. Welzl Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, michawe@ifi.uio.no Pages: 19 Characters: 46449 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-08.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8087 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8087 The goal of this document is to describe the potential benefits of applications using a transport that enables Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN). The document outlines the principal gains in terms of increased throughput, reduced delay, and other benefits when ECN is used over a network path that includes equipment that supports Congestion Experienced (CE) marking. It also discusses challenges for successful deployment of ECN. It does not propose new algorithms to use ECN nor does it describe the details of implementation of ECN in endpoint devices (Internet hosts), routers, or other network devices. This document is a product of the Active Queue Management and Packet Scheduling Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 7 14:19:17 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A8D129657 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:19:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GdIGUT9xJaTs for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:19:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE225129658 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41287B819A4; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:39 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0675EB819B9; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:38 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170307221838.0675EB819B9@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:38 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8095 on Services Provided by IETF Transport Protocols and Congestion Control Mechanisms X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, taps@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8095 Title: Services Provided by IETF Transport Protocols and Congestion Control Mechanisms Author: G. Fairhurst, Ed., B. Trammell, Ed., M. Kuehlewind, Ed. Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, ietf@trammell.ch, mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch Pages: 54 Characters: 126843 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-taps-transports-14.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8095 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8095 This document describes, surveys, and classifies the protocol mechanisms provided by existing IETF protocols, as background for determining a common set of transport services. It examines the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Multipath TCP, the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP), the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), UDP-Lite, the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP), the Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP), the Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP), File Delivery over Unidirectional Transport / Asynchronous Layered Coding (FLUTE/ALC) for Reliable Multicast, NACK- Oriented Reliable Multicast (NORM), Transport Layer Security (TLS), Datagram TLS (DTLS), and the Hypertext Transport Protocol (HTTP), when HTTP is used as a pseudotransport. This survey provides background for the definition of transport services within the TAPS working group. This document is a product of the Transport Services Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 7 14:19:23 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FBF129655 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:19:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y91GbQOOKkvy for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:19:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55FF2129649 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67F1B819B5; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:52 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1D8FFB819B9; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:51 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170307221851.1D8FFB819B9@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:18:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8108 on Sending Multiple RTP Streams in a Single RTP Session X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, avt@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8108 Title: Sending Multiple RTP Streams in a Single RTP Session Author: J. Lennox, M. Westerlund, Q. Wu, C. Perkins Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: jonathan@vidyo.com, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, bill.wu@huawei.com, csp@csperkins.org Pages: 29 Characters: 74580 Updates: RFC 3550, RFC 4585 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-multi-stream-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8108 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8108 This memo expands and clarifies the behavior of Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) endpoints that use multiple synchronization sources (SSRCs). This occurs, for example, when an endpoint sends multiple RTP streams in a single RTP session. This memo updates RFC 3550 with regard to handling multiple SSRCs per endpoint in RTP sessions, with a particular focus on RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) behavior. It also updates RFC 4585 to change and clarify the calculation of the timeout of SSRCs and the inclusion of feedback messages. This document is a product of the Audio/Video Transport Core Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 8 19:30:07 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414B6129722 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:30:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dv0OjFc6AT1e for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:30:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E0BD120727 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:30:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4D8B8103C; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:30:01 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B8D57B8103B; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:29:59 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170309032959.B8D57B8103B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:29:59 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8107 on Advertising Digital Identifier (Ad-ID) URN Namespace Definition X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8107 Title: Advertising Digital Identifier (Ad-ID) URN Namespace Definition Author: J. Wold Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: jwold@ad-id.org Pages: 7 Characters: 11060 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-adid-urn-03.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8107 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8107 Advertising Digital Identifiers (Ad-IDs) are used to identify advertising assets across all media platforms. This document defines the formal Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace Identifier (NID) "adid" for Ad-IDs. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Mar 9 18:36:36 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0593A12943B for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2NkmNPAjLgfg for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1AE01294A6 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D26EB8023C; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:33 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9B96AB8020A; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:31 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310020631.9B96AB8020A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:31 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8100 on Diffserv-Interconnection Classes and Practice X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8100 Title: Diffserv-Interconnection Classes and Practice Author: R. Geib, Ed., D. Black Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de, david.black@dell.com Pages: 21 Characters: 50264 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-14.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8100 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8100 This document defines a limited common set of Diffserv Per-Hop Behaviors (PHBs) and Diffserv Codepoints (DSCPs) to be applied at (inter)connections of two separately administered and operated networks, and it explains how this approach can simplify network configuration and operation. Many network providers operate Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) using Treatment Aggregates for traffic marked with different Diffserv Per-Hop Behaviors and use MPLS for interconnection with other networks. This document offers a simple interconnection approach that may simplify operation of Diffserv for network interconnection among providers that use MPLS and apply the Short Pipe Model. While motivated by the requirements of MPLS network operators that use Short Pipe Model tunnels, this document is applicable to other networks, both MPLS and non-MPLS. This document is a product of the Transport Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Mar 9 18:36:38 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA1D1294CE for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wpbj8XYGNafX for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC5801294B2 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73247B806C4; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:07:22 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D83B6B801A3; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:07:20 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310020720.D83B6B801A3@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:07:20 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8113 on Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP): Shared Extension Message & IANA Registry for Packet Type Allocations X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8113 Title: Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP): Shared Extension Message & IANA Registry for Packet Type Allocations Author: M. Boucadair, C. Jacquenet Status: Experimental Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, christian.jacquenet@orange.com Pages: 6 Characters: 10608 Updates: RFC 6830 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8113 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8113 This document specifies a Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) shared message type for defining future extensions and conducting experiments without consuming a LISP packet type codepoint for each extension. It also defines a registry for LISP Packet Type allocations, thus updating RFC 6830. This document is a product of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol Working Group of the IETF. EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Mar 9 18:36:39 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E271294D5 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uKLXihrmkbmU for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F30C61294C9 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DA2B8062E; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:44 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 08ED8B805C3; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:43 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310020643.08ED8B805C3@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8102 on Remote-LFA Node Protection and Manageability X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rtgwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8102 Title: Remote-LFA Node Protection and Manageability Author: P. Sarkar, Ed., S. Hegde, C. Bowers, H. Gredler, S. Litkowski Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com, shraddha@juniper.net, cbowers@juniper.net, hannes@rtbrick.com, stephane.litkowski@orange.com Pages: 22 Characters: 50200 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-13.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8102 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8102 The loop-free alternates (LFAs) computed following the current remote-LFA specification guarantees only link protection. The resulting remote-LFA next hops (also called "PQ-nodes") may not guarantee node protection for all destinations being protected by it. This document describes an extension to the remote-loop-free-based IP fast reroute mechanisms that specifies procedures for determining whether or not a given PQ-node provides node protection for a specific destination. The document also shows how the same procedure can be utilized for the collection of complete characteristics for alternate paths. Knowledge about the characteristics of all alternate paths is a precursor to applying the operator-defined policy for eliminating paths not fitting the constraints. This document is a product of the Routing Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Mar 9 18:41:34 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DBE1294B2 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:41:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4vWCEeLJlpA for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:41:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47D0C1294FA for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:41:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387FBB80196; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:14 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 35E11B80184; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:13 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310020613.35E11B80184@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:13 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8082 on Using Codec Control Messages in the RTP Audio-Visual Profile with Feedback with Layered Codecs X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, avtext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8082 Title: Using Codec Control Messages in the RTP Audio-Visual Profile with Feedback with Layered Codecs Author: S. Wenger, J. Lennox, B. Burman, M. Westerlund Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: stewe@stewe.org, jonathan@vidyo.com, bo.burman@ericsson.com, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com Pages: 11 Characters: 25093 Updates: RFC 5104 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-avtext-avpf-ccm-layered-04.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8082 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8082 This document updates RFC 5104 by fixing a shortcoming in the specification language of the Codec Control Message Full Intra Request (FIR) description when using it with layered codecs. In particular, a decoder refresh point needs to be sent by a media sender when a FIR is received on any layer of the layered bitstream, regardless of whether those layers are being sent in a single or in multiple RTP flows. The other payload-specific feedback messages defined in RFC 5104 and RFC 4585 (which was updated by RFC 5506) have also been analyzed, and no corresponding shortcomings have been found. This document is a product of the Audio/Video Transport Extensions Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Mar 10 09:23:27 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9416C1296A5 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7NaT5m8dAVq0 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE2CD1294CF for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D080B80E4F; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:20 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 31EA1B80E4E; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:19 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310172319.31EA1B80E4E@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:19 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8078 on Managing DS Records from the Parent via CDS/CDNSKEY X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dnsop@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8078 Title: Managing DS Records from the Parent via CDS/CDNSKEY Author: O. Gudmundsson, P. Wouters Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: olafur+ietf@cloudflare.com, pwouters@redhat.com Pages: 10 Characters: 21001 Updates: RFC 7344 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8078 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8078 RFC 7344 specifies how DNS trust can be maintained across key rollovers in-band between parent and child. This document elevates RFC 7344 from Informational to Standards Track. It also adds a method for initial trust setup and removal of a secure entry point. Changing a domain's DNSSEC status can be a complicated matter involving multiple unrelated parties. Some of these parties, such as the DNS operator, might not even be known by all the organizations involved. The inability to disable DNSSEC via in-band signaling is seen as a problem or liability that prevents some DNSSEC adoption at a large scale. This document adds a method for in-band signaling of these DNSSEC status changes. This document describes reasonable policies to ease deployment of the initial acceptance of new secure entry points (DS records). It is preferable that operators collaborate on the transfer or move of a domain. The best method is to perform a Key Signing Key (KSK) plus Zone Signing Key (ZSK) rollover. If that is not possible, the method using an unsigned intermediate state described in this document can be used to move the domain between two parties. This leaves the domain temporarily unsigned and vulnerable to DNS spoofing, but that is preferred over the alternative of validation failures due to a mismatched DS and DNSKEY record. This document is a product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Mar 10 09:24:01 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845B71299AC for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:24:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lLyIfM8RtX1a for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:24:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 600231299A4 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773EEB80E57; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:31 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 81BE8B80E56; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:30 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310172330.81BE8B80E56@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:30 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8117 on Current Hostname Practice Considered Harmful X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, int-area@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8117 Title: Current Hostname Practice Considered Harmful Author: C. Huitema, D. Thaler, R. Winter Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: huitema@huitema.net, dthaler@microsoft.com, rolf.winter@hs-augsburg.de Pages: 12 Characters: 26750 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-05.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8117 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8117 Giving a hostname to your computer and publishing it as you roam from one network to another is the Internet's equivalent of walking around with a name tag affixed to your lapel. This current practice can significantly compromise your privacy, and something should change in order to mitigate these privacy threats. There are several possible remedies, such as fixing a variety of protocols or avoiding disclosing a hostname at all. This document describes some of the protocols that reveal hostnames today and sketches another possible remedy, which is to replace static hostnames by frequently changing randomized values. This document is a product of the Internet Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Mar 10 09:24:34 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C081299CA for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:24:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xUMIv-Kquud8 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:24:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 914841299A4 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:24:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDAFB80E5E; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:41 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7F541B80E5C; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:40 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310172340.7F541B80E5C@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:40 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8128 on IETF Appointment Procedures for the ICANN Root Zone Evolution Review Committee X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8128 Title: IETF Appointment Procedures for the ICANN Root Zone Evolution Review Committee Author: C. Morgan Status: Informational Stream: IAB Date: March 2017 Mailbox: cmorgan@amsl.com Pages: 5 Characters: 9416 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-iab-rzerc-02.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8128 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8128 This memo outlines the process by which the IETF makes an appointment to the ICANN Root Zone Evolution Review Committee (RZERC). This document is a product of the Internet Architecture Board. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 14 21:25:43 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18D01289C3 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NmQMAoW0vz6t for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5585128954 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4E7B8125E; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 15E48B8125D; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:30 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170315042530.15E48B8125D@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8097 on BGP Prefix Origin Validation State Extended Community X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, sidr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8097 Title: BGP Prefix Origin Validation State Extended Community Author: P. Mohapatra, K. Patel, J. Scudder, D. Ward, R. Bush Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: mpradosh@yahoo.com, keyur@arrcus.com, jgs@juniper.net, dward@cisco.com, randy@psg.com Pages: 6 Characters: 12287 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8097 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8097 This document defines a new BGP opaque extended community to carry the origination Autonomous System (AS) validation state inside an autonomous system. Internal BGP (IBGP) speakers that receive this validation state can configure local policies that allow it to influence their decision process. This document is a product of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 14 22:27:27 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99F112945C for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sGVDNGDf-ycu for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65361129458 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2FBB800F6; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D99B800F5; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20 hex): X-Spam-Report: ...that system for details.\n \n Content previ[...] Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hC9YQWayVX2z; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [IPv6:2001:43f8:90:606::169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F4070B800C3; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=40966 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1co1Sn-00023P-9e; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:27:09 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2F5R8tP028300; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:27:08 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1co0WM-0006ur-Dt for daniel@afrinic.net; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 04:26:54 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:59608) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1co0WL-0004Se-Q0 for daniel@afrinic.net; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 04:26:46 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35600128BB6; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489551947; bh=7+GbyxquPrrbHxSH75N80pfv55La2py20FGj18lwrlY=; h=To:From:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Cc; b=oYCH6W1j+0qKupY8CDz+jjIhT9sSGeCPJngmNAviCSZerdZL2Cn+RNcplRd+GqONe i65fZvPJ95+BMZlKCSJanFBTE3WqDmS9uXaR7M7LpZWRJJtJIyL7rTpZuiAZYmM7YX bxV3ZQ86P1W3AuIvKRzTVMcJ0v6cAQ6px6HQeTPU= X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD98128896; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bMFmtkb-xmIj; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B27127B31; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 15E48B8125D; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:30 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170315042530.15E48B8125D@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:30 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [rfc-dist] [sidr] RFC 8097 on BGP Prefix Origin Validation State Extended Community X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, sidr@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8097 Title: BGP Prefix Origin Validation State Extended Community Author: P. Mohapatra, K. Patel, J. Scudder, D. Ward, R. Bush Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: mpradosh@yahoo.com, keyur@arrcus.com, jgs@juniper.net, dward@cisco.com, randy@psg.com Pages: 6 Characters: 12287 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8097 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8097 This document defines a new BGP opaque extended community to carry the origination Autonomous System (AS) validation state inside an autonomous system. Internal BGP (IBGP) speakers that receive this validation state can configure local policies that allow it to influence their decision process. This document is a product of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 14 22:27:45 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D2C12945E for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nKAO0r88c8Av for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD73F129458 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0090EB80100; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1B3B800C3; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20 hex): X-Spam-Report: ...that system for details.\n \n Content previ[...] Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MMLwEVT0X6XZ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [IPv6:2001:43f8:90:606::169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A9BB800E6; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=40964 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1co1Sm-00023N-4U; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:27:08 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2F5R6It028281; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:27:06 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1co0VW-0006um-Qx for daniel@afrinic.net; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 04:26:06 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:41403) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1co0VV-0004SU-SZ for daniel@afrinic.net; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 04:25:54 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E2D1289B0; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489551943; bh=QJ54zAQ9SKhWszEAAUo/Bb3Vefzx+bXihuSyYf+5M60=; h=To:Subject:From:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Reply-To:Cc; b=zDfVciW1ymaoAp/S+xnalFnEa5rDxTckzCcTYIesN7yYaHrZWa2mEiUv0vxt6O+eR vLJOB9zeADdESN4AH03/HOdi1YTr8jQvl3rm2+pcUXhvllQyWCNX+7qr35kximtc2I d6MTladq8CavCj0CN5HTc3DFhla0B2FADIr0m+0g= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD98128896; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bMFmtkb-xmIj; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B27127B31; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 15E48B8125D; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:30 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170315042530.15E48B8125D@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:30 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8097 on BGP Prefix Origin Validation State Extended Community X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, sidr@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8097 Title: BGP Prefix Origin Validation State Extended Community Author: P. Mohapatra, K. Patel, J. Scudder, D. Ward, R. Bush Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: mpradosh@yahoo.com, keyur@arrcus.com, jgs@juniper.net, dward@cisco.com, randy@psg.com Pages: 6 Characters: 12287 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8097 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8097 This document defines a new BGP opaque extended community to carry the origination Autonomous System (AS) validation state inside an autonomous system. Internal BGP (IBGP) speakers that receive this validation state can configure local policies that allow it to influence their decision process. This document is a product of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 14 22:28:17 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D34129461 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZcBzZW8fmllS for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B9212945F for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703E0B80127; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F2BB80121; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ltlwrfRSUs_p; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [IPv6:2001:43f8:90:606::169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FCD8B80100; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=41040 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1co1Tj-00025q-IJ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:28:07 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2F5S6SZ028432; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:28:06 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmOWR-0003NJ-2t for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:40:18 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:45740) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmOIw-00077O-Nq for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:26:15 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2356F1299B3; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:24:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489166643; bh=kHZ4adKrlnr8b2TROF1qeNQ1f4yOAJx9IMtY+j1APE8=; h=To:Subject:From:Date:Cc:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=wWWYsN0uyqHTMmW1iAep2O/ox5QYIwJd3QuP2tUe3o6PuOLKKNmYUrldejOs5vQCe vE2+WyacnuLy4bahldPZKpN76Y6G0joY757sG/IFfsY2ndh5fiGNG0b9Anmuqundx4 AQhN3EainCXPAwHT7By8xnNAfQEY/MVl+Vl71wzg= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E9E1299A5 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:24:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PZawLSluaxhu for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:24:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B78E129982 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7F541B80E5C; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:40 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310172340.7F541B80E5C@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:40 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8128 on IETF Appointment Procedures for the ICANN Root Zone Evolution Review Committee X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8128 Title: IETF Appointment Procedures for the ICANN Root Zone Evolution Review Committee Author: C. Morgan Status: Informational Stream: IAB Date: March 2017 Mailbox: cmorgan@amsl.com Pages: 5 Characters: 9416 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-iab-rzerc-02.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8128 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8128 This memo outlines the process by which the IETF makes an appointment to the ICANN Root Zone Evolution Review Committee (RZERC). This document is a product of the Internet Architecture Board. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 14 22:28:34 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1925B129461 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: <4N4f1nvluxgF> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4N4f1nvluxgF for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2709612945F for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EE6B80121; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196C5B80137; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JqaGlBqPt5fN; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [IPv6:2001:43f8:90:606::169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F23CDB8011F; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=41042 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1co1Tk-000260-NO; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:28:08 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2F5S8lM028436; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:28:08 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmOWp-0003NW-IR for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:40:57 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:40969) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmOHr-00076o-Lb for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:25:08 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA968129997; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489166639; bh=3XLyREob+D5hm0Ag1UCnrGUWV/iLxHm7pq8VUPaAIB0=; h=To:Subject:From:Date:Cc:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=DHjFbTWPPwft/bfaBu+OnwodM1WBWtNoim32oFeDigFihsEf65onLpSZYBqG/anRG 7gccOKLsGAy54lQHKtHuMt68Ma0iCFklos8maaOtv3nvedHyRx4wPfsx0jfLfxpzRT qxc63wztPOTVmDniJsWkFPS1dAfxFEcRfl1KDuGw= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7151299A7; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tR0ccuNgvQw0; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CDCC1299A1; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 81BE8B80E56; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:30 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310172330.81BE8B80E56@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:30 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8117 on Current Hostname Practice Considered Harmful X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, int-area@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8117 Title: Current Hostname Practice Considered Harmful Author: C. Huitema, D. Thaler, R. Winter Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: huitema@huitema.net, dthaler@microsoft.com, rolf.winter@hs-augsburg.de Pages: 12 Characters: 26750 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-intarea-hostname-practice-05.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8117 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8117 Giving a hostname to your computer and publishing it as you roam from one network to another is the Internet's equivalent of walking around with a name tag affixed to your lapel. This current practice can significantly compromise your privacy, and something should change in order to mitigate these privacy threats. There are several possible remedies, such as fixing a variety of protocols or avoiding disclosing a hostname at all. This document describes some of the protocols that reveal hostnames today and sketches another possible remedy, which is to replace static hostnames by frequently changing randomized values. This document is a product of the Internet Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 14 22:28:49 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A06D129464 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lOhytSiU07BG for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEADD129463 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B29AB80141; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B915BB8011F; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RX4xYPefPLXp; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [IPv6:2001:43f8:90:606::169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FBEBB8011A; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=41044 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1co1Tl-000269-Ki; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:28:09 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2F5S9Eo028440; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:28:09 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmOXA-0003NJ-M6 for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:41:10 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:60135) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmOHF-00076X-1y for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:24:29 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3CE1296A5; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489166611; bh=bUnYmvghLoAquj/NJZrw6wHkkVrYni9kA3f4FKtKDrs=; h=To:From:Date:Cc:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=rdYUBDC6OCJ8hOGrmOUOEzrskRWZjBoeVb23cFQA+2yWGv89+njDmmTUl79J5m9A8 yOXJhycNtspmJXXoyJLBNp72d7zsSMtZfYgs1oENrypuMH/rfNaYSMUBmDVaHn9iGF B5dMl1evTXKiSMI8uMEHTD2lHEFdjOpjeujBnteM= X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD1E1296A4; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uIfYBdP5hg16; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C230C1294CF; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 31EA1B80E4E; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:19 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310172319.31EA1B80E4E@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:19 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [rfc-dist] [DNSOP] RFC 8078 on Managing DS Records from the Parent via CDS/CDNSKEY X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dnsop@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8078 Title: Managing DS Records from the Parent via CDS/CDNSKEY Author: O. Gudmundsson, P. Wouters Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: olafur+ietf@cloudflare.com, pwouters@redhat.com Pages: 10 Characters: 21001 Updates: RFC 7344 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8078 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8078 RFC 7344 specifies how DNS trust can be maintained across key rollovers in-band between parent and child. This document elevates RFC 7344 from Informational to Standards Track. It also adds a method for initial trust setup and removal of a secure entry point. Changing a domain's DNSSEC status can be a complicated matter involving multiple unrelated parties. Some of these parties, such as the DNS operator, might not even be known by all the organizations involved. The inability to disable DNSSEC via in-band signaling is seen as a problem or liability that prevents some DNSSEC adoption at a large scale. This document adds a method for in-band signaling of these DNSSEC status changes. This document describes reasonable policies to ease deployment of the initial acceptance of new secure entry points (DS records). It is preferable that operators collaborate on the transfer or move of a domain. The best method is to perform a Key Signing Key (KSK) plus Zone Signing Key (ZSK) rollover. If that is not possible, the method using an unsigned intermediate state described in this document can be used to move the domain between two parties. This leaves the domain temporarily unsigned and vulnerable to DNS spoofing, but that is preferred over the alternative of validation failures due to a mismatched DS and DNSKEY record. This document is a product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 14 22:29:19 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F46129466 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:29:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FRipEFtOTH6M for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A730129469 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2ABB80158; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01166B80139; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gvDwd8pNkDk4; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [196.192.112.169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1735B80100; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:28:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=41046 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1co1Tm-00026K-VN; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:28:11 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2F5S90Z028444; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:28:09 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmOXC-0003NW-DK for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:41:14 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:54798) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmOGL-00075X-MD for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:23:34 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2581294CF; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489166608; bh=MgOkBuLvt8az9oTPxnI9mrIpaOYXXvVIDzia3UosX0c=; h=To:Subject:From:Date:Cc:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=hksPOTIGYFtN+4hFNmk0P+iUB2OONXMmLeKFTB7VpxJN9xXcCeWfNB8ooRrUVYhcK /HHPDWfESOtdArmZSzwpeAHBRqLDF5s9b/TY1urm+QClndhQude5ZA9ahtkSsSRwab hhzj0U0RSoq2tQCwlnC9JCHAsiHabZCCnxTeQ/9c= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD1E1296A4; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uIfYBdP5hg16; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C230C1294CF; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 31EA1B80E4E; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:19 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310172319.31EA1B80E4E@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:23:19 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8078 on Managing DS Records from the Parent via CDS/CDNSKEY X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dnsop@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8078 Title: Managing DS Records from the Parent via CDS/CDNSKEY Author: O. Gudmundsson, P. Wouters Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: olafur+ietf@cloudflare.com, pwouters@redhat.com Pages: 10 Characters: 21001 Updates: RFC 7344 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8078 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8078 RFC 7344 specifies how DNS trust can be maintained across key rollovers in-band between parent and child. This document elevates RFC 7344 from Informational to Standards Track. It also adds a method for initial trust setup and removal of a secure entry point. Changing a domain's DNSSEC status can be a complicated matter involving multiple unrelated parties. Some of these parties, such as the DNS operator, might not even be known by all the organizations involved. The inability to disable DNSSEC via in-band signaling is seen as a problem or liability that prevents some DNSSEC adoption at a large scale. This document adds a method for in-band signaling of these DNSSEC status changes. This document describes reasonable policies to ease deployment of the initial acceptance of new secure entry points (DS records). It is preferable that operators collaborate on the transfer or move of a domain. The best method is to perform a Key Signing Key (KSK) plus Zone Signing Key (ZSK) rollover. If that is not possible, the method using an unsigned intermediate state described in this document can be used to move the domain between two parties. This leaves the domain temporarily unsigned and vulnerable to DNS spoofing, but that is preferred over the alternative of validation failures due to a mismatched DS and DNSKEY record. This document is a product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 14 22:35:59 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B7A129482 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K0veJRrhX2lj for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66E25129495 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6737B8013B; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CFBB80139; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: <5OOOShxSR3fh> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5OOOShxSR3fh; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [196.192.112.169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 958D6B80131; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=41324 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1co1b8-0002RP-MI; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:35:46 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2F5ZjmH028982; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:35:45 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmAQA-00055I-PZ for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:36:52 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:38247) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmAQ8-0005e5-Rs for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:36:46 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0900E1294CA; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489113398; bh=PPfM79iWYcM5o1PT+uNdWwIpfbLe43SYYnBzzaXEyio=; h=To:Subject:From:Date:Cc:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=nyVHGLg6f8sI0VkQ1pUme+mOdnxqGxPcpy8DxTAUvLNNkUpSEm1ViGcPG2oYFvb9p rGmbw0TtAq51MLKkOtDBGyPLPaYknd09OZgW3WebvhY2uW2wGnC4ZbheQ64Z7nEAI6 5VQ4DW7a/bzj67pbN+SwZv0SWeKGSqZ7W59qZPUQ= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD9A1294CA; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id arvS1_Gh-eNq; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B18AF12943B; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9B96AB8020A; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:31 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310020631.9B96AB8020A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:31 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8100 on Diffserv-Interconnection Classes and Practice X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8100 Title: Diffserv-Interconnection Classes and Practice Author: R. Geib, Ed., D. Black Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de, david.black@dell.com Pages: 21 Characters: 50264 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-14.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8100 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8100 This document defines a limited common set of Diffserv Per-Hop Behaviors (PHBs) and Diffserv Codepoints (DSCPs) to be applied at (inter)connections of two separately administered and operated networks, and it explains how this approach can simplify network configuration and operation. Many network providers operate Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) using Treatment Aggregates for traffic marked with different Diffserv Per-Hop Behaviors and use MPLS for interconnection with other networks. This document offers a simple interconnection approach that may simplify operation of Diffserv for network interconnection among providers that use MPLS and apply the Short Pipe Model. While motivated by the requirements of MPLS network operators that use Short Pipe Model tunnels, this document is applicable to other networks, both MPLS and non-MPLS. This document is a product of the Transport Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 14 22:36:12 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC3D129495 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:36:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: <5qGt42lindgQ> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5qGt42lindgQ for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02CA1129482 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532ADB8014C; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A07B80131; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WMvzzAuLmNn3; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [196.192.112.169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CBFFB80134; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=41326 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1co1b9-0002RR-NG; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:35:47 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2F5Zlsu028987; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:35:47 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmAR7-00055w-SN for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:37:48 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:39284) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmAR7-0005fW-8B for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:37:45 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B7E1294D5; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489113409; bh=+P+VBB7M/lVRs29T/nxrf6+AuwxQMfzEsDQ4jPJbZec=; h=To:Subject:From:Date:Cc:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=SeTvc5tu07ciJnBQxhQNnf8P/DRkPZMEIpbKE4OExs1FqoiGPHEbxgTb59ee7C+JZ RDuGoDaLbBU2rQDohjz3iY9i4z5AV8sMYUTi1QyahyEHp2gy5yPM3gfWT8ec672TXI bpefhM6nfcaf4rfpGgyL2Mzyivllf6xq69P82+Kk= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B851294CA for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2WGRqgPI4okv for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB3901294C3 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D83B6B801A3; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:07:20 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310020720.D83B6B801A3@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:07:20 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8113 on Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP): Shared Extension Message & IANA Registry for Packet Type Allocations X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8113 Title: Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP): Shared Extension Message & IANA Registry for Packet Type Allocations Author: M. Boucadair, C. Jacquenet Status: Experimental Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, christian.jacquenet@orange.com Pages: 6 Characters: 10608 Updates: RFC 6830 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lisp-type-iana-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8113 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8113 This document specifies a Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) shared message type for defining future extensions and conducting experiments without consuming a LISP packet type codepoint for each extension. It also defines a registry for LISP Packet Type allocations, thus updating RFC 6830. This document is a product of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol Working Group of the IETF. EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 14 22:36:27 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7011129495 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:36:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MzeLnZ-qUPM8 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCDD6129482 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAA0B80169; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B11EB80158; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SvML3eDTem8R; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [196.192.112.169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30AEAB80137; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=41328 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1co1bA-0002Rg-MH; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:35:48 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2F5ZmEW028991; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:35:48 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmAS3-00056B-7A for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:38:45 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:43043) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmAS2-0005gF-Jk for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:38:42 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B30D129507; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489113417; bh=j+gsHlNPVAwHKpsmfd3+eIWi2jFk39M22L4tZ2E7o8E=; h=To:Subject:From:Date:Cc:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=mZVibZZeMddHcwgMOBHrGpKaey3Uyehbzgehk+Lwzm/E0TT0j94T5bOKVAxPCtcHe R+RYsxEWlXV7TgdJSyylmjcVtihV0tWiK9T5YtxO9aGGIiis36cuZSVGrDYhlocrtj s8XJbEcUUQhJph3KiU48vLSnyQQvwsf/KjJFd4O0= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59041294D5; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mmUA9LWGqT0e; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1E721294C4; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 08ED8B805C3; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:43 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310020643.08ED8B805C3@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:43 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8102 on Remote-LFA Node Protection and Manageability X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, rtgwg@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8102 Title: Remote-LFA Node Protection and Manageability Author: P. Sarkar, Ed., S. Hegde, C. Bowers, H. Gredler, S. Litkowski Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com, shraddha@juniper.net, cbowers@juniper.net, hannes@rtbrick.com, stephane.litkowski@orange.com Pages: 22 Characters: 50200 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-13.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8102 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8102 The loop-free alternates (LFAs) computed following the current remote-LFA specification guarantees only link protection. The resulting remote-LFA next hops (also called "PQ-nodes") may not guarantee node protection for all destinations being protected by it. This document describes an extension to the remote-loop-free-based IP fast reroute mechanisms that specifies procedures for determining whether or not a given PQ-node provides node protection for a specific destination. The document also shows how the same procedure can be utilized for the collection of complete characteristics for alternate paths. Knowledge about the characteristics of all alternate paths is a precursor to applying the operator-defined policy for eliminating paths not fitting the constraints. This document is a product of the Routing Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Mar 14 22:36:47 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E688129496 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:36:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: <81umar9umYcn> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.092 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81umar9umYcn for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CF93129482 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A25CB8017A; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E69B8015E; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MT99PJRvEkIj; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [196.192.112.169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34512B80138; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 22:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=41334 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1co1bB-0002Rp-Kg; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:35:49 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2F5Zn0Q029001; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:35:49 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmAUy-00056m-B3 for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:41:46 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:45878) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmAUx-0005oZ-P7 for daniel@afrinic.net; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:41:44 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8C9129444; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:41:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489113699; bh=nc7izziHD2/DKTZJNpLegGgHe0r8T1GLd0qJjmMUDIc=; h=To:Subject:From:Date:Cc:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe; b=U8q0jUozXXbw0gljR1+eiVQ7pXRhwXJDRbuGUgzMKBCBlstr38tnIpRYbVGzENx75 FHbg8KBdFOLYhOEcbxXBJXILAkJXg8WcWtjeZ/MbrNT6AxeNBop2txlhxLQJ0yauCS 5TmU30gaS6eu7Ycq+cRE30Cb2J0tWZ4LdqNVoj1Q= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE4F1294B2; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:41:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EH9ZlMx3Lf6C; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:41:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F8831294E1; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:41:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 35E11B80184; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:13 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170310020613.35E11B80184@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:13 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8082 on Using Codec Control Messages in the RTP Audio-Visual Profile with Feedback with Layered Codecs X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, avtext@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8082 Title: Using Codec Control Messages in the RTP Audio-Visual Profile with Feedback with Layered Codecs Author: S. Wenger, J. Lennox, B. Burman, M. Westerlund Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: stewe@stewe.org, jonathan@vidyo.com, bo.burman@ericsson.com, magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com Pages: 11 Characters: 25093 Updates: RFC 5104 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-avtext-avpf-ccm-layered-04.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8082 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8082 This document updates RFC 5104 by fixing a shortcoming in the specification language of the Codec Control Message Full Intra Request (FIR) description when using it with layered codecs. In particular, a decoder refresh point needs to be sent by a media sender when a FIR is received on any layer of the layered bitstream, regardless of whether those layers are being sent in a single or in multiple RTP flows. The other payload-specific feedback messages defined in RFC 5104 and RFC 4585 (which was updated by RFC 5506) have also been analyzed, and no corresponding shortcomings have been found. This document is a product of the Audio/Video Transport Extensions Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 15 17:07:57 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C96012EE45 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9NxRFi3ES7cY for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC5A612ECED for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4058B8142F; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A70FAB81428; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:39 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170316000739.A70FAB81428@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8104 on Pseudowire (PW) Endpoint Fast Failure Protection X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pals@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8104 Title: Pseudowire (PW) Endpoint Fast Failure Protection Author: Y. Shen, R. Aggarwal, W. Henderickx, Y. Jiang Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: yshen@juniper.net, raggarwa_1@yahoo.com, wim.henderickx@nokia.com, jiangyuanlong@huawei.com Pages: 43 Characters: 94878 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-05.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8104 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8104 This document specifies a fast mechanism for protecting pseudowires (PWs) transported by IP/MPLS tunnels against egress endpoint failures, including egress attachment circuit (AC) failure, egress provider edge (PE) failure, multi-segment PW terminating PE failure, and multi-segment PW switching PE failure. Operating on the basis of multihomed customer edge (CE), redundant PWs, upstream label assignment, and context-specific label switching, the mechanism enables local repair to be performed by the router upstream adjacent to a failure. The router can restore a PW in the order of tens of milliseconds, by rerouting traffic around the failure to a protector through a pre-established bypass tunnel. Therefore, the mechanism can be used to reduce traffic loss before global repair reacts to the failure and the network converges on the topology changes due to the failure. This document is a product of the Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 15 17:09:16 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17AAB1315A7 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:09:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c8j7kofmlvhJ for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:09:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA65312FEE1 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A436B814E2; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5E9CCB814DA; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:58 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170316000758.5E9CCB814DA@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] BCP 209, RFC 8109 on Initializing a DNS Resolver with Priming Queries X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dnsop@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 209 RFC 8109 Title: Initializing a DNS Resolver with Priming Queries Author: P. Koch, M. Larson, P. Hoffman Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: pk@DENIC.DE, matt.larson@icann.org, paul.hoffman@icann.org Pages: 7 Characters: 15645 See Also: BCP 209 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8109 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8109 This document describes the queries that a DNS resolver should emit to initialize its cache. The result is that the resolver gets both a current NS Resource Record Set (RRset) for the root zone and the necessary address information for reaching the root servers. This document is a product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 15 17:09:55 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961E1130134 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:09:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I7A5HkeIrOxp for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:09:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1657513013D for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CD2B8153C; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C46AFB81533; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:08 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170316000808.C46AFB81533@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8119 on SIP "cause" URI Parameter for Service Number Translation X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8119 Title: SIP "cause" URI Parameter for Service Number Translation Author: M. Mohali, M. Barnes Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: marianne.mohali@orange.com, mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com Pages: 12 Characters: 24142 Updates: RFC 4458 I-D Tag: draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-14.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8119 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8119 RFC 4458 (regarding SIP URIs for applications) defines a "cause" URI parameter, which may appear in the Request-URI of a SIP request, that is used to indicate a reason why the request arrived to the User Agent Server (UAS) receiving the message. This document updates RFC 4458 by creating a new predefined value for the "cause" URI parameter to cover service number translation for cases of retargeting due to specific service action leading to the translation of a called service access number. This document also provides guidance, which was missing in RFC 4458, for using the "cause" URI parameter within the History-Info header field, since this use is mandatory in some IP networks' implementations. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 15 23:12:11 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AAD124D37 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: <1xvouIImyYHq> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.093 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1xvouIImyYHq for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 624E51204DA for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFB2B80A5B; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:11:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27060B80A59; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:11:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20 hex): X-Spam-Report: ...that system for details.\n \n Content previ[...] Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tEr6gx5rLPpw; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:11:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [IPv6:2001:43f8:90:606::169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8658B80A58; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:11:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=39580 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1coOdX-0004Kr-3I; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:11:47 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2G6Bh89013440; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:11:43 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1coJ0T-0000XC-GF for daniel@afrinic.net; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:11:12 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:39578) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1coJ0S-0005OQ-Sl for daniel@afrinic.net; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:11:05 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC17E12F257; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:09:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489622990; bh=oyrSdCrB+poG+DUWGC1kpfMVqngkd5t7QGFy1kWOtO0=; h=To:Subject:From:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Reply-To:Cc; b=NIj6NPbjdYjG+H4Dp2VZN/4fVBg0zIkdVGpEeRZy0pXiAfllpE1djjdI56uGPr2fl wzlwoWTes+/5ZXAHACVErY+PHXJDDkmWWl18L8a/2A9BL0FOLR9hgLBAxJ9Ml9eg4r adRo6WSA5bePc6KEfqEmbFcPwI0SSUsYbWOTe4dY= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350D61300E7 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:09:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id blXKxvGOeA_D for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:09:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D01513012B for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C46AFB81533; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:08 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170316000808.C46AFB81533@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8119 on SIP "cause" URI Parameter for Service Number Translation X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8119 Title: SIP "cause" URI Parameter for Service Number Translation Author: M. Mohali, M. Barnes Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: marianne.mohali@orange.com, mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com Pages: 12 Characters: 24142 Updates: RFC 4458 I-D Tag: draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-14.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8119 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8119 RFC 4458 (regarding SIP URIs for applications) defines a "cause" URI parameter, which may appear in the Request-URI of a SIP request, that is used to indicate a reason why the request arrived to the User Agent Server (UAS) receiving the message. This document updates RFC 4458 by creating a new predefined value for the "cause" URI parameter to cover service number translation for cases of retargeting due to specific service action leading to the translation of a called service access number. This document also provides guidance, which was missing in RFC 4458, for using the "cause" URI parameter within the History-Info header field, since this use is mandatory in some IP networks' implementations. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 15 23:12:31 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F632124D37 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.093 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tK-n1IQZ-La2 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C954E1204DA for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82348B80A63; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD4AB80A59; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20 hex): X-Spam-Report: ...that system for details.\n \n Content previ[...] Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eBMRE8raKzkb; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [IPv6:2001:43f8:90:606::169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1FB6B80A58; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:11:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=39606 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1coOdl-0004Lg-SC; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:12:02 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2G6C1xG013486; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:12:01 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1coIzY-0000Wx-LE for daniel@afrinic.net; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:10:15 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:56369) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1coIzY-0005Ha-1O for daniel@afrinic.net; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:10:08 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809A8130A93; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489622937; bh=u2FRMlCQY3xUP7sbPlZpkunw62EWP6I6UVXqhw8dj2M=; h=To:Subject:From:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Reply-To:Cc; b=EhYHH4qs++rjZgakktHPy6goeH/0pjQlOml7ydLuq/BznZ5tqfySlwtSvf/xuQSkb YsVxWaBfLVTgmguPkIe2CHGji4j/aLfgtU4K3diop/qr6+HsUt9MX9GLZV//K6tz7i balV//4vZdq8/BBCmtYOcrDBW9Iv+dypghvP+WVc= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5FA130153; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uiCP00hzBUUg; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E81CA12FB9A; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5E9CCB814DA; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:58 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170316000758.5E9CCB814DA@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list Subject: [rfc-dist] BCP 209, RFC 8109 on Initializing a DNS Resolver with Priming Queries X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dnsop@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 209 RFC 8109 Title: Initializing a DNS Resolver with Priming Queries Author: P. Koch, M. Larson, P. Hoffman Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: pk@DENIC.DE, matt.larson@icann.org, paul.hoffman@icann.org Pages: 7 Characters: 15645 See Also: BCP 209 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8109 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8109 This document describes the queries that a DNS resolver should emit to initialize its cache. The result is that the resolver gets both a current NS Resource Record Set (RRset) for the root zone and the necessary address information for reaching the root servers. This document is a product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 15 23:12:48 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6581D124D37 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.093 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PS5bW46U8xFL for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C52CD1204DA for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA89AB80A67; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3548B80A58; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20 hex): X-Spam-Report: ...that system for details.\n \n Content previ[...] Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mS6B2wI5glZ4; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [IPv6:2001:43f8:90:606::169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C933B80A5E; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=39598 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1coOdi-0004LP-R6; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:11:59 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2G6BwlB013474; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:11:58 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1coIxo-0000WD-0k for daniel@afrinic.net; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:08:31 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:50774) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1coIxn-0005Gk-2n for daniel@afrinic.net; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:08:19 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB8512F092; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489622878; bh=cDzUdIkp6wygHPYdAOMxfUOjSoPV/nDu4DsjPFW4g+Q=; h=To:Subject:From:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Reply-To:Cc; b=h2wnYwcetG+uyJaDUJyWAiIKxoSJA8BhoYa5txuoXEU5rtLIRcNyZKirWSWL2wDXn SRpRj96z1/k4D5Qe/SGfiACbPmto59FNql1SBicVlqZ4JTZULMVL7aq3iwBpI3yiAY YOjzwLH8FmheT4u90BZ+UuiJGK6XqyP8JtFSpOuA= X-Original-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietf-announce@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB5112ECF5; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lmUYZMx30sCe; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 392BE12EA7A; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A70FAB81428; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:39 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170316000739.A70FAB81428@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: ietf-announce@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8104 on Pseudowire (PW) Endpoint Fast Failure Protection X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, pals@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8104 Title: Pseudowire (PW) Endpoint Fast Failure Protection Author: Y. Shen, R. Aggarwal, W. Henderickx, Y. Jiang Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: yshen@juniper.net, raggarwa_1@yahoo.com, wim.henderickx@nokia.com, jiangyuanlong@huawei.com Pages: 43 Characters: 94878 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-05.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8104 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8104 This document specifies a fast mechanism for protecting pseudowires (PWs) transported by IP/MPLS tunnels against egress endpoint failures, including egress attachment circuit (AC) failure, egress provider edge (PE) failure, multi-segment PW terminating PE failure, and multi-segment PW switching PE failure. Operating on the basis of multihomed customer edge (CE), redundant PWs, upstream label assignment, and context-specific label switching, the mechanism enables local repair to be performed by the router upstream adjacent to a failure. The router can restore a PW in the order of tens of milliseconds, by rerouting traffic around the failure to a protector through a pre-established bypass tunnel. Therefore, the mechanism can be used to reduce traffic loss before global repair reacts to the failure and the network converges on the topology changes due to the failure. This document is a product of the Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 15 23:13:04 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DA1124D68 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:13:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.093 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.093 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=ietf.org Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JC_ZAzu15eLc for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B66124D37 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5989BB80A6D; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist+badh@rfc-editor.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12DFB80A65; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:12:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20 hex): X-Spam-Report: ...that system for details.\n \n Content previ[...] Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ietf.org Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nSiVqgJwoe1C; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.mu.afrinic.net (smtp.afrinic.net [IPv6:2001:43f8:90:606::169]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 771A7B80A62; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 23:11:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [2001:42d0:0:410::143] (port=39604 helo=spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net) by smtp.mu.afrinic.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1coOdk-0004LY-AR; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:12:01 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by spamfilter.jnb.afrinic.net (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id v2G6BxdG013481; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 06:11:59 GMT (envelope-from no-reply@afrinic.net) To: daniel@afrinic.net Received: from mx02.jnb.afrinic.net ([2001:42d0:0:201::22] helo=mx.afrinic.net) by spamfilter.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1coIz5-0000We-0n for daniel@afrinic.net; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:09:46 +0000 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]:45576) by mx.afrinic.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1coIz4-0005HH-Cd for daniel@afrinic.net; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:09:38 +0000 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4BF130154; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1489622936; bh=JlYtOq5PQnVFbhMWXK41XJ6AaVTYIbXwFHxUtbgME0E=; h=To:From:Date:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Cc; b=vcuYstYHq/DitgXIsDlcK0wNanztDr/2WDtBzXCTdvcqcPi3km/QEhO1XnTYpLBKK 9WR42jgxprys3fPY7sLsCv/UFXtl2WD0eOn/4en4rDoQE9rGXmt3jvLxSJPOpw6N91 5/IT99Jf96mt8YKMBLAsCTxTqmR+Azn43aV5jrGk= X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5FA130153; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uiCP00hzBUUg; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E81CA12FB9A; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5E9CCB814DA; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:58 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170316000758.5E9CCB814DA@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [rfc-dist] [DNSOP] BCP 209, RFC 8109 on Initializing a DNS Resolver with Priming Queries X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dnsop@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 209 RFC 8109 Title: Initializing a DNS Resolver with Priming Queries Author: P. Koch, M. Larson, P. Hoffman Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: pk@DENIC.DE, matt.larson@icann.org, paul.hoffman@icann.org Pages: 7 Characters: 15645 See Also: BCP 209 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8109 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8109 This document describes the queries that a DNS resolver should emit to initialize its cache. The result is that the resolver gets both a current NS Resource Record Set (RRset) for the root zone and the necessary address information for reaching the root servers. This document is a product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Mar 17 16:09:58 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A5A12965D for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:09:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DnkptM_-pbMw for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2FDE12965B for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987C8B80D88; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:09:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 07876B80D87; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:09:40 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170317230940.07876B80D87@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:09:40 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8029 on Detecting Multiprotocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data-Plane Failures X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8029 Title: Detecting Multiprotocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data-Plane Failures Author: K. Kompella, G. Swallow, C. Pignataro, Ed., N. Kumar, S. Aldrin, M. Chen Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: kireeti.kompella@gmail.com, swallow.ietf@gmail.com, cpignata@cisco.com, naikumar@cisco.com, aldrin.ietf@gmail.com, mach.chen@huawei.com Pages: 78 Characters: 174158 Obsoletes: RFC 4379, RFC 6424, RFC 6829, RFC 7537 Updates: RFC 1122 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc4379bis-09.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8029 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8029 This document describes a simple and efficient mechanism to detect data-plane failures in Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs). It defines a probe message called an "MPLS echo request" and a response message called an "MPLS echo reply" for returning the result of the probe. The MPLS echo request is intended to contain sufficient information to check correct operation of the data plane and to verify the data plane against the control plane, thereby localizing faults. This document obsoletes RFCs 4379, 6424, 6829, and 7537, and updates RFC 1122. This document is a product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Mar 17 16:10:38 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA4212967A for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zQaCg-QY_V7Y for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02DFD129677 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288F1B80D94; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 18BD3B80D93; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:04 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170317231004.18BD3B80D93@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8106 on IPv6 Router Advertisement Options for DNS Configuration X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ipv6@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8106 Title: IPv6 Router Advertisement Options for DNS Configuration Author: J. Jeong, S. Park, L. Beloeil, S. Madanapalli Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: pauljeong@skku.edu, soohong.park@samsung.com, luc.beloeil@orange.com, smadanapalli@gmail.com Pages: 19 Characters: 43092 Obsoletes: RFC 6106 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis-16.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8106 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8106 This document specifies IPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) options (called "DNS RA options") to allow IPv6 routers to advertise a list of DNS Recursive Server Addresses and a DNS Search List to IPv6 hosts. This document, which obsoletes RFC 6106, defines a higher default value of the lifetime of the DNS RA options to reduce the likelihood of expiry of the options on links with a relatively high rate of packet loss. This document is a product of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Mar 17 16:11:01 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD80812967E for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I3nP-PeVAZVL for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7561712965D for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C344B80DA2; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8FF5AB80DA1; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:26 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170317231026.8FF5AB80DA1@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8114 on Delivery of IPv4 Multicast Services to IPv4 Clients over an IPv6 Multicast Network X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: softwires@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8114 Title: Delivery of IPv4 Multicast Services to IPv4 Clients over an IPv6 Multicast Network Author: M. Boucadair, C. Qin, C. Jacquenet, Y. Lee, Q. Wang Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, jacni@jacni.com, christian.jacquenet@orange.com, yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com, 13301168516@189.cn Pages: 23 Characters: 47896 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-18.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8114 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8114 This document specifies a solution for the delivery of IPv4 multicast services to IPv4 clients over an IPv6 multicast network. The solution relies upon a stateless IPv4-in-IPv6 encapsulation scheme and uses an IPv6 multicast distribution tree to deliver IPv4 multicast traffic. The solution is particularly useful for the delivery of multicast service offerings to customers serviced by Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite). This document is a product of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Mar 17 16:11:29 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AED2129687 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XsZJb8f1VZ4t for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45608129689 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3E9B80DAA; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 29B59B80DA9; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:42 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170317231042.29B59B80DA9@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8115 on DHCPv6 Option for IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: softwires@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8115 Title: DHCPv6 Option for IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes Author: M. Boucadair, J. Qin, T. Tsou, X. Deng Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, jacni@jacni.com, tina.tsou@philips.com, dxhbupt@gmail.com Pages: 9 Characters: 17386 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-15.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8115 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8115 This document defines a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 6 (DHCPv6) Option for multicast IPv4 service continuity solutions, which is used to carry the IPv6 prefixes to be used to build unicast and multicast IPv4-embedded IPv6 addresses. This document is a product of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Mar 17 16:11:57 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB31129677 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WnsG4PaMe2xB for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE0B12952D for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A16B80DBE; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 981F6B80DBC; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:01 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170317231101.981F6B80DBC@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8118 on The application/pdf Media Type X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8118 Title: The application/pdf Media Type Author: M. Hardy, L. Masinter, D. Markovic, D. Johnson, M. Bailey Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: mahardy@adobe.com, masinter@adobe.com, dmarkovi@adobe.com, duff.johnson@pdfa.org, martin.bailey@globalgraphics.com Pages: 12 Characters: 24463 Obsoletes: RFC 3778 I-D Tag: draft-hardy-pdf-mime-05.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8118 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8118 The Portable Document Format (PDF) is an ISO standard (ISO 32000-1:2008) defining a final-form document representation language in use for document exchange, including on the Internet, since 1993. This document provides an overview of the PDF format and updates the media type registration of "application/pdf". It obsoletes RFC 3778. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Mar 17 16:12:19 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A1F1296BC for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:12:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V0R4bEgTwu7A for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:12:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DA1412969B for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79B2B80DC6; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C2BD9B80DC7; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:12 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170317231112.C2BD9B80DC7@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8122 on Connection-Oriented Media Transport over the Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol in the Session Description Protocol (SDP) X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, mmusic@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8122 Title: Connection-Oriented Media Transport over the Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol in the Session Description Protocol (SDP) Author: J. Lennox, C. Holmberg Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: jonathan@vidyo.com, christer.holmberg@ericsson.com Pages: 18 Characters: 42792 Obsoletes: RFC 4572 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-13.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8122 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8122 This document specifies how to establish secure connection-oriented media transport sessions over the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol using the Session Description Protocol (SDP). It defines the SDP protocol identifier, 'TCP/TLS'. It also defines the syntax and semantics for an SDP 'fingerprint' attribute that identifies the certificate that will be presented for the TLS session. This mechanism allows media transport over TLS connections to be established securely, so long as the integrity of session descriptions is assured. This document obsoletes RFC 4572 by clarifying the usage of multiple fingerprints. This document is a product of the Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 22 15:56:17 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1CB126C83 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7buSaHThpzHm for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1F5C127058 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781E9B80D77; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2A536B80D76; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:09 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170322225609.2A536B80D76@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8076 on A Usage for Shared Resources in RELOAD (ShaRe) X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, p2psip@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8076 Title: A Usage for Shared Resources in RELOAD (ShaRe) Author: A. Knauf, T. Schmidt, Ed., G. Hege, M. Waehlisch Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: alexanderknauf@gmail.com, t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de, hege@daviko.com, mw@link-lab.net Pages: 22 Characters: 46545 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-p2psip-share-10.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8076 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8076 This document defines a REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD) Usage for managing shared write access to RELOAD Resources. Shared Resources in RELOAD (ShaRe) form a basic primitive for enabling various coordination and notification schemes among distributed peers. Access in ShaRe is controlled by a hierarchical trust delegation scheme maintained within an access list. A new USER-CHAIN-ACL access policy allows authorized peers to write a Shared Resource without owning its corresponding certificate. This specification also adds mechanisms to store Resources with a variable name that is useful whenever peer-independent rendezvous processes are required. This document is a product of the Peer-to-Peer Session Initiation Protocol Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 22 15:56:54 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE79129B60 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id APpUWUSpV7s1 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DEFF129ACC for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40FEB80D7F; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8F782B80D84; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:29 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170322225629.8F782B80D84@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8101 on IANA Registration of New Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Resource-Priority Namespace for Mission Critical Push To Talk Service X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8101 Title: IANA Registration of New Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Resource-Priority Namespace for Mission Critical Push To Talk Service Author: C. Holmberg, J. Axell Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: christer.holmberg@ericsson.com, jorgen.axell@ericsson.com Pages: 6 Characters: 10649 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-holmberg-dispatch-mcptt-rp-namespace-05.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8101 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8101 This document creates additional Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Resource-Priority namespaces to meet the requirements of the 3GPP-defined Mission Critical Push To Talk (MCPTT) and places these namespaces in the corresponding IANA registry. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 22 15:57:14 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28885129C26 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:57:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QxfBLlS-fsNC for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F98129B3A for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E9FB80D95; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2FB6FB80D93; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:46 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170322225646.2FB6FB80D93@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8123 on Requirements for Marking SIP Messages to be Logged X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, insipid@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8123 Title: Requirements for Marking SIP Messages to be Logged Author: P. Dawes, C. Arunachalam Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: peter.dawes@vodafone.com, carunach@cisco.com Pages: 11 Characters: 22368 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-insipid-logme-reqs-12.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8123 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8123 SIP networks use signaling monitoring tools to debug customer- reported problems and for regression testing if network or client software is upgraded. As networks grow and become interconnected, including connection via transit networks, it becomes impractical to predict the path that SIP signaling will take between clients and, therefore, impractical to monitor SIP signaling end-to-end. This document describes the requirements for adding an indicator to the SIP Protocol Data Unit (PDU) or a SIP message that marks the PDU as a candidate for logging. Such a marking will typically be applied as part of network testing controlled by the network operator and not used in regular client signaling. However, such a marking can be carried end-to-end, including the SIP terminals, even if a session originates and terminates in different networks. This document is a product of the INtermediary-safe SIP session ID Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 22 15:57:44 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEBE129C30 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:57:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sHmcXRGY91AE for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 866561299F3 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B902CB80D9C; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:57:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7410DB80DA0; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:59 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170322225659.7410DB80DA0@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8129 on Authentication Indicator in Kerberos Tickets X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kitten@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8129 Title: Authentication Indicator in Kerberos Tickets Author: A. Jain, N. Kinder, N. McCallum Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: ajain323@gatech.edu, nkinder@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com Pages: 6 Characters: 11296 Updates: RFC 4120 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8129 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8129 This document updates RFC 4120, as it specifies an extension in the Kerberos protocol. It defines a new authorization data type, AD-AUTHENTICATION-INDICATOR. The purpose of introducing this data type is to include an indicator of the strength of a client's authentication in service tickets so that application services can use it as an input into policy decisions. This document is a product of the Common Authentication Technology Next Generation Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 22 15:57:57 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B8C129C4E for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:57:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OlOjFMahQh7x for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6788129512 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:57:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E68FB80DB2; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:57:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C4FC0B80DAD; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:57:11 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170322225711.C4FC0B80DAD@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8131 on RSVP-TE Signaling Procedure for End-to-End GMPLS Restoration and Resource Sharing X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, teas@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8131 Title: RSVP-TE Signaling Procedure for End-to-End GMPLS Restoration and Resource Sharing Author: X. Zhang, H. Zheng, Ed., R. Gandhi, Ed., Z. Ali, P. Brzozowski Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: zhang.xian@huawei.com, zhenghaomian@huawei.com, rgandhi@cisco.com, zali@cisco.com, pbrzozowski@advaoptical.com Pages: 15 Characters: 33403 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-08.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8131 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8131 In non-packet transport networks, there are requirements where the Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) end-to-end recovery scheme needs to employ a restoration Label Switched Path (LSP) while keeping resources for the working and/or protecting LSPs reserved in the network after the failure occurs. This document reviews how the LSP association is to be provided using Resource Reservation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) signaling in the context of a GMPLS end-to-end recovery scheme when using restoration LSP where failed LSP is not torn down. In addition, this document discusses resource sharing-based setup and teardown of LSPs as well as LSP reversion procedures. No new signaling extensions are defined by this document, and it is strictly informative in nature. This document is a product of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Mar 29 14:20:57 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE201298CC for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:20:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WYJ1AXZl4-_3 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:20:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD5F41288B8 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EA3B80EA0; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:20:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 63942B80E9F; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:20:38 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170329212038.63942B80E9F@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8073 on Coordinating Attack Response at Internet Scale (CARIS) Workshop Report X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8073 Title: Coordinating Attack Response at Internet Scale (CARIS) Workshop Report Author: K. Moriarty, M. Ford Status: Informational Stream: IAB Date: March 2017 Mailbox: Kathleen.Moriarty@dell.com, ford@isoc.org Pages: 16 Characters: 36872 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-iab-carisreport-02.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8073 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8073 This report documents the discussions and conclusions from the Coordinating Attack Response at Internet Scale (CARIS) workshop that took place in Berlin, Germany on 18 June 2015. The purpose of this workshop was to improve mutual awareness, understanding, and coordination among the diverse participating organizations and their representatives. Note that this document is a report on the proceedings of the workshop. The views and positions documented in this report are those of the workshop participants and do not necessarily reflect IAB views and positions. This document is a product of the Internet Architecture Board. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Mar 30 14:39:56 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59591296B5 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:39:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VftAeC9fB6Uy for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBC2A127B31 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A2DB80E4A; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:39:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id EB12DB80E49; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:39:37 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170330213937.EB12DB80E49@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:39:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8110 on Opportunistic Wireless Encryption X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8110 Title: Opportunistic Wireless Encryption Author: D. Harkins, Ed., W. Kumari, Ed. Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: dharkins@arubanetworks.com, warren@kumari.net Pages: 12 Characters: 26719 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-harkins-owe-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8110 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8110 This memo specifies an extension to IEEE Std 802.11 to provide for opportunistic (unauthenticated) encryption to the wireless media. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Mar 30 14:40:18 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1851296D4 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:40:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9kHzRtVY4y50 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECCD2127B31 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677D9B80E53; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:39:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D0A95B80E52; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:39:54 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170330213954.D0A95B80E52@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8124 on The Session Description Protocol (SDP) WebSocket Connection URI Attribute X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, bfcpbis@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8124 Title: The Session Description Protocol (SDP) WebSocket Connection URI Attribute Author: R. Ravindranath, G. Salgueiro Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: rmohanr@cisco.com, gsalguei@cisco.com Pages: 12 Characters: 24562 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-09.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8124 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8124 The WebSocket protocol enables bidirectional real-time communication between clients and servers in web-based applications. This document specifies extensions to Session Description Protocol (SDP) for application protocols using WebSocket as a transport. This document is a product of the Binary Floor Control Protocol Bis Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Mar 30 14:40:49 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BA71296FA for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:40:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hM7zXPDrv6IM for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:40:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 901CD12963F for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3049B80E5C; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:40:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6D845B80E5A; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:40:08 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170330214008.6D845B80E5A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8130 on RTP Payload Format for the Mixed Excitation Linear Prediction Enhanced (MELPe) Codec X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, payload@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8130 Title: RTP Payload Format for the Mixed Excitation Linear Prediction Enhanced (MELPe) Codec Author: V. Demjanenko, D. Satterlee Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: victor.demjanenko@vocal.com, david.satterlee@vocal.com Pages: 30 Characters: 64594 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-payload-melpe-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8130 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8130 This document describes the RTP payload format for the Mixed Excitation Linear Prediction Enhanced (MELPe) speech coder. MELPe's three different speech encoding rates and sample frame sizes are supported. Comfort noise procedures and packet loss concealment are described in detail. This document is a product of the Audio/Video Transport Payloads Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Mar 30 14:41:16 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A950129736 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:41:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bR2po4P_eiPF for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AEA71296F2 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:40:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3435BB80E65; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:40:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 51FBCB80E63; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:40:22 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20170330214022.51FBCB80E63@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] RFC 8133 on The Security Evaluated Standardized Password-Authenticated Key Exchange (SESPAKE) Protocol X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8133 Title: The Security Evaluated Standardized Password-Authenticated Key Exchange (SESPAKE) Protocol Author: S. Smyshlyaev. Ed., E. Alekseev, I. Oshkin, V. Popov Status: Informational Stream: Independent Date: March 2017 Mailbox: svs@cryptopro.ru, alekseev@cryptopro.ru, oshkin@cryptopro.ru, vpopov@cryptopro.ru Pages: 51 Characters: 89986 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-smyshlyaev-sespake-16.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8133 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8133 This document describes the Security Evaluated Standardized Password- Authenticated Key Exchange (SESPAKE) protocol. The SESPAKE protocol provides password-authenticated key exchange for usage in systems for protection of sensitive information. The security proofs of the protocol were made for situations involving an active adversary in the channel, including man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks and attacks based on the impersonation of one of the subjects. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org