
From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Wed Aug  1 09:16:25 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5581286E3 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  1 Aug 2018 09:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IzBR_ToKkgxc for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed,  1 Aug 2018 09:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B56B126F72 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Wed,  1 Aug 2018 09:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C443B81171; Wed,  1 Aug 2018 09:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A66B81171 for <rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>; Wed,  1 Aug 2018 09:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PFBhqbm9iHWI for <rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>; Wed,  1 Aug 2018 09:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C63D0B8116F for <rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>; Wed,  1 Aug 2018 09:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51D9C1D1B95 for <rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>; Wed,  1 Aug 2018 09:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-f170.google.com (mail-io0-f170.google.com [209.85.223.170]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B7461D1B84 for <rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>; Wed,  1 Aug 2018 09:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-f170.google.com with SMTP id l14-v6so16520640iob.7 for <rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 09:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHanNHlniWvcx4RXsE7hk5tQ3MZ5EpTR/WXv0Q6E8JwSJPpeXpH ooSBTduDlSlhsF1e3kOLSkqypxVgI421CW8TwOQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpd+v1gcLHZTojcVcAGb+gvq/JplsiBQWMYWmoQqkHVJSg2GwWjKCnaObWVwUvCFooS3bzuemaa2DbwX7EmCvVE=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:d812:: with SMTP id y18-v6mr3737356iob.141.1533140178576;  Wed, 01 Aug 2018 09:16:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a02:504:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Glen <glen@amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:15:58 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CABL0ig4r8xtubrDzgrpE5fWoYG=BP+KOMYXxk1d13EhEL+0fUg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABL0ig4r8xtubrDzgrpE5fWoYG=BP+KOMYXxk1d13EhEL+0fUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [rfc-dist] Mailman password reminder emails
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Greetings -

A number of you - myself included - will have received the dreaded
Mailman password reminder email this morning.   This is obviously a
bad thing: the script, part of the Mailman distribution, sends Mailman
passwords out to users in regular clear email.  Worse, its operation
cannot be disabled via configuration option, it can only be disabled
by patching the Mailman source files:  commenting out the relevant
cron entry, and removing the script.

AMS regularly applies OS-provided software updates and security
patches to the RFC Production Center servers as a part of our ongoing
maintenance duties.  We've seen Mailman updates before install without
issue; however, the most recent update silently re-enabled the cron
entry and restored the script... and we did not catch it.  So, last
night, the flood began.

Our engineers have already disabled and removed the script again, and
I've asked them to add a specific monitoring rule to our monitoring
systems that will continuously check for the presence of this script
and alert our team immediately if it is ever restored again by a
future update.

I apologize for the disturbance and the noise.

Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (RFC Production Center Secretariat)
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Mon Aug  6 22:38:46 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0543B130E88 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1sqOrdeuJpqL for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 613FB130DD8 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CBFB817BC; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8BFBEB817BB; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180807053838.8BFBEB817BB@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8410_on_Algorithm_Identifiers_for_Ed255?= =?utf-8?q?19=2C_Ed448=2C_X25519=2C_and_X448_for_Use_in_the_Internet_X=2E5?= =?utf-8?q?09_Public_Key_Infrastructure?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, curdle@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8410

        Title:      Algorithm Identifiers for Ed25519, Ed448, 
                    X25519, and X448 for Use in 
                    the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure 
        Author:     S. Josefsson,
                    J. Schaad
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    simon@josefsson.org, 
                    ietf@augustcellars.com
        Pages:      20
        Characters: 34896
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-curdle-pkix-10.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8410

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8410

This document specifies algorithm identifiers and ASN.1 encoding
formats for elliptic curve constructs using the curve25519 and
curve448 curves.  The signature algorithms covered are Ed25519 and
Ed448.  The key agreement algorithms covered are X25519 and X448.
The encoding for public key, private key, and Edwards-curve Digital
Signature Algorithm (EdDSA) structures is provided.

This document is a product of the CURves, Deprecating and a Little more Encryption Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Mon Aug  6 22:39:05 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B05130E91 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V4lc8rraaP0R for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 423E4130E19 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC6CB817C9; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6B391B817C1; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180807053842.6B391B817C1@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8411_on_IANA_Registration_for_the_Crypt?= =?utf-8?q?ographic_Algorithm_Object_Identifier_Range?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, curdle@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8411

        Title:      IANA Registration for the Cryptographic 
                    Algorithm Object Identifier Range 
        Author:     J. Schaad,
                    R. Andrews
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    ietf@augustcellars.com, 
                    rick.andrews@digicert.com
        Pages:      5
        Characters: 8985
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry-03.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8411

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8411

When the Curdle Security Working Group was chartered, a range of
object identifiers was donated by DigiCert, Inc. for the purpose of
registering the Edwards Elliptic Curve key agreement and signature
algorithms.  This donated set of OIDs allowed for shorter values than
would be possible using the existing S/MIME or PKIX arcs.  This
document describes the donated range and the identifiers that were
assigned from that range, transfers control of that range to IANA,
and establishes IANA allocation policies for any future assignments
within that range.

This document is a product of the CURves, Deprecating and a Little more Encryption Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Mon Aug  6 22:39:20 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FF9130E9B for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sdKk9q8TBCS3 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 501D0130E89 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF32B817D2; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:38:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 836FCB817CF; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180807053847.836FCB817CF@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8418_on_Use_of_the_Elliptic_Curve_Diffi?= =?utf-8?q?e-Hellman_Key_Agreement_Algorithm_with_X25519_and_X448_in_the_C?= =?utf-8?q?ryptographic_Message_Syntax_=28CMS=29?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, curdle@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8418

        Title:      Use of the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman 
                    Key Agreement Algorithm with X25519 and X448 
                    in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) 
        Author:     R. Housley
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    housley@vigilsec.com
        Pages:      18
        Characters: 36498
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-curdle-cms-ecdh-new-curves-10.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8418

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8418

This document describes the conventions for using the Elliptic Curve
Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) key agreement algorithm with curve25519 and
curve448 in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS).

This document is a product of the CURves, Deprecating and a Little more Encryption Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Mon Aug  6 22:39:48 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CB9130F70 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UqBwPkZ5VxRj for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59C14130F1D for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46EBB817E2; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 61311B817C0; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180807053935.61311B817C0@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8419_on_Use_of_Edwards-Curve_Digital_Si?= =?utf-8?q?gnature_Algorithm_=28EdDSA=29_Signatures_in_the_Cryptographic_M?= =?utf-8?q?essage_Syntax_=28CMS=29?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, curdle@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8419

        Title:      Use of Edwards-Curve Digital Signature 
                    Algorithm (EdDSA) Signatures in the Cryptographic 
                    Message Syntax (CMS) 
        Author:     R. Housley
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    housley@vigilsec.com
        Pages:      9
        Characters: 19080
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-08.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8419

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8419

This document specifies the conventions for using the Edwards-curve
Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA) for curve25519 and curve448 in
the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS).  For each curve, EdDSA
defines the PureEdDSA and HashEdDSA modes.  However, the HashEdDSA
mode is not used with the CMS.  In addition, no context string is
used with the CMS.

This document is a product of the CURves, Deprecating and a Little more Encryption Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Mon Aug  6 22:40:14 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0970130F89 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y4OcFVcLY2yT for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77EAD130F70 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686DCB817E9; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id BBCC1B817EC; Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180807053944.BBCC1B817EC@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon,  6 Aug 2018 22:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8422_on_Elliptic_Curve_Cryptography_=28?= =?utf-8?q?ECC=29_Cipher_Suites_for_Transport_Layer_Security_=28TLS=29_Ver?= =?utf-8?q?sions_1=2E2_and_Earlier?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8422

        Title:      Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites 
                    for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 
                    and Earlier 
        Author:     Y. Nir, 
                    S. Josefsson,
                    M. Pegourie-Gonnard
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    ynir.ietf@gmail.com, 
                    simon@josefsson.org, 
                    mpg@elzevir.fr
        Pages:      34
        Characters: 69965
        Obsoletes:  RFC 4492

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-17.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8422

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8422

This document describes key exchange algorithms based on Elliptic
Curve Cryptography (ECC) for the Transport Layer Security (TLS)
protocol.  In particular, it specifies the use of Ephemeral Elliptic
Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDHE) key agreement in a TLS handshake and the
use of the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) and
Edwards-curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA) as authentication
mechanisms.

This document obsoletes RFC 4492.

This document is a product of the Transport Layer Security Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Aug  7 17:33:04 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C71B128CB7 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  7 Aug 2018 17:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29qFYpSPeKdh for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue,  7 Aug 2018 17:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C997130DC0 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue,  7 Aug 2018 17:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACB4B8187A; Tue,  7 Aug 2018 17:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9C4BBB81879; Tue,  7 Aug 2018 17:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180808003256.9C4BBB81879@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue,  7 Aug 2018 17:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8416_on_Simplified_Local_Internet_Numbe?= =?utf-8?q?r_Resource_Management_with_the_RPKI_=28SLURM=29?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, sidr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8416

        Title:      Simplified Local Internet Number Resource 
                    Management with the RPKI (SLURM) 
        Author:     D. Ma, 
                    D. Mandelberg,
                    T. Bruijnzeels
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    madi@zdns.cn, 
                    david@mandelberg.org, 
                    tim@nlnetlabs.nl
        Pages:      17
        Characters: 34613
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-08.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8416

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8416

The Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) is a global
authorization infrastructure that allows the holder of Internet
Number Resources (INRs) to make verifiable statements about those
resources.  Network operators, e.g., Internet Service Providers
(ISPs), can use the RPKI to validate BGP route origin assertions.
ISPs can also use the RPKI to validate the path of a BGP route.
However, ISPs may want to establish a local view of exceptions to the
RPKI data in the form of local filters and additions.  The mechanisms
described in this document provide a simple way to enable INR holders
to establish a local, customized view of the RPKI, overriding global
RPKI repository data as needed.

This document is a product of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Aug 10 16:54:44 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF9A130E7C for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:54:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XU1fACdqQ_CN for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD4D2129385 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDD5B812C0; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9FFB1B812BA; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180810235434.9FFB1B812BA@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8446_on_The_Transport_Layer_Security_?= =?utf-8?q?=28TLS=29_Protocol_Version_1=2E3?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8446

        Title:      The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol 
                    Version 1.3 
        Author:     E. Rescorla
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    ekr@rtfm.com
        Pages:      160
        Characters: 337736
        Obsoletes:  RFC 5077, RFC 5246, RFC 6961
        Updates:    RFC 5705, RFC 6066

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-tls-tls13-28.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8446

This document specifies version 1.3 of the Transport Layer Security
(TLS) protocol.  TLS allows client/server applications to communicate
over the Internet in a way that is designed to prevent eavesdropping,
tampering, and message forgery.

This document updates RFCs 5705 and 6066, and obsoletes RFCs 5077,
5246, and 6961.  This document also specifies new requirements for
TLS 1.2 implementations.

This document is a product of the Transport Layer Security Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Aug 10 16:55:05 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AC2130E8A for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bP653XyQIuaK for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9368E130ED4 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8159AB812ED; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id DDEB6B812E8; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180810235447.DDEB6B812E8@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8447_on_IANA_Registry_Updates_for_TLS_a?= =?utf-8?q?nd_DTLS?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8447

        Title:      IANA Registry Updates for TLS and DTLS 
        Author:     J. Salowey,
                    S. Turner
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    joe@salowey.net, 
                    sean@sn3rd.com
        Pages:      20
        Characters: 44773
        Updates:    RFC 3749, RFC 4680, RFC 5077, RFC 5246,  
                    RFC 5705, RFC 5878, RFC 6520, RFC 7301

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-05.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8447

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8447

This document describes a number of changes to TLS and DTLS IANA
registries that range from adding notes to the registry all the way
to changing the registration policy.  These changes were mostly
motivated by WG review of the TLS- and DTLS-related registries
undertaken as part of the TLS 1.3 development process.

This document updates the following RFCs: 3749, 5077, 4680, 5246,
5705, 5878, 6520, and 7301.

This document is a product of the Transport Layer Security Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Aug 10 16:55:22 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF22130E7C for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id waTuZnwaSFQk for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1DB4131088 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:55:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA0AB812F5; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 856F6B812F4; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180810235504.856F6B812F4@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8449_on_Record_Size_Limit_Extension_for?= =?utf-8?q?_TLS?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8449

        Title:      Record Size Limit Extension for TLS 
        Author:     M. Thomson
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    martin.thomson@gmail.com
        Pages:      8
        Characters: 18932
        Updates:    RFC 6066

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-03.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8449

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8449

An extension to Transport Layer Security (TLS) is defined that allows
endpoints to negotiate the maximum size of protected records that
each will send the other.

This replaces the maximum fragment length extension defined in
RFC 6066.

This document is a product of the Transport Layer Security Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Mon Aug 20 16:56:37 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5053B130E68 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eF6wOm4hTvrE for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 258E5130DF7 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B22DB804E6; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0986AB804DA; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180820235619.0986AB804DA@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8420_on_Using_the_Edwards-Curve_Digital?= =?utf-8?q?_Signature_Algorithm_=28EdDSA=29_in_the_Internet_Key_Exchange_P?= =?utf-8?q?rotocol_Version_2_=28IKEv2=29?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8420

        Title:      Using the Edwards-Curve Digital Signature 
                    Algorithm (EdDSA) in the Internet Key 
                    Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) 
        Author:     Y. Nir
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    ynir.ietf@gmail.com
        Pages:      5
        Characters: 9023
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-ipsecme-eddsa-04.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8420

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8420

This document describes the use of the Edwards-curve Digital
Signature Algorithm (EdDSA) in the Internet Key Exchange Protocol
Version 2 (IKEv2).

This document is a product of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Mon Aug 20 16:56:54 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C8E130EB0 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j4r3vGOiY-wT for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0D5D130EA7 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3785B805B2; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id ED7A2B80500; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180820235624.ED7A2B80500@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8424_on_Extensions_to_RSVP-TE_for_Label?= =?utf-8?q?_Switched_Path_=28LSP=29_Ingress_Fast_Reroute_=28FRR=29_Protect?= =?utf-8?q?ion?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, teas@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8424

        Title:      Extensions to RSVP-TE for Label Switched Path (LSP)
                    Ingress Fast Reroute (FRR) Protection 
        Author:     H. Chen, Ed.,
                    R. Torvi, Ed.
        Status:     Experimental
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    huaimo.chen@huawei.com, 
                    rtorvi@juniper.net
        Pages:      28
        Characters: 62022
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection-17.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8424

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8424

This document describes extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol -
Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for locally protecting the ingress node
of a Point-to-Point (P2P) or Point-to-Multipoint (P2MP) Traffic
Engineered (TE) Label Switched Path (LSP).  It extends the Fast
Reroute (FRR) protection for transit nodes of an LSP to the ingress
node of the LSP.  The procedures described in this document are
experimental.

This document is a product of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Working Group of the IETF.


EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the
Internet community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any
kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Mon Aug 20 19:37:28 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B621130DF6 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 19:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sFiAlrOqbI0F for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 19:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AACF130E02 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 19:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72439B80D4E; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 19:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B6EAAB80D4D; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 19:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180821023712.B6EAAB80D4D@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 19:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8440_on_IMAP4_Extension_for_Returning_M?= =?utf-8?q?YRIGHTS_Information_in_Extended_LIST?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: extra@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8440

        Title:      IMAP4 Extension for Returning MYRIGHTS 
                    Information in Extended LIST 
        Author:     K. Murchison, 
                    B. Gondwana
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    murch@fastmailteam.com, 
                    brong@fastmailteam.com
        Pages:      6
        Characters: 11969
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-extra-imap-list-myrights-07.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8440

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8440

This document defines an extension to the Internet Message Access
Protocol (IMAP) LIST command that allows the client to request the
set of rights that the logged-in user has been granted on mailboxes,
along with other information typically returned by the LIST command.

This document is a product of the Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Aug 21 14:44:49 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B55130F09 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OAYnBFzAFK-9 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D46871277CC for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB22B81990; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 09E65B8198F; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180821214432.09E65B8198F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8436_on_Update_to_IANA_Registration_Pro?= =?utf-8?q?cedures_for_Pool_3_Values_in_the_Differentiated_Services_Field_?= =?utf-8?q?Codepoints_=28DSCP=29_Registry?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8436

        Title:      Update to IANA Registration Procedures for 
                    Pool 3 Values in the Differentiated Services 
                    Field Codepoints (DSCP) Registry 
        Author:     G. Fairhurst
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
        Pages:      7
        Characters: 13999
        Updates:    RFC 2474

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-dscp-registry-08.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8436

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8436

The Differentiated Services (Diffserv) architecture specifies use of
the DS field in the IPv4 and IPv6 packet headers to carry one of 64
distinct differentiated services field codepoint (DSCP) values.  The
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) maintains a registry of
assigned DSCP values.

This update to RFC 2474 changes the IANA registration policy for Pool
3 of the registry (i.e., DSCP values of the form xxxx01) to Standards
Action, i.e., values are assigned through a Standards Track or Best
Current Practice RFC.  The update also removes permission for
experimental and local use of the codepoints that form Pool 3 of the
DSCP registry; Pool 2 Codepoints (i.e., DSCP values of the form
xxxx11) remain available for these purposes.

This document is a product of the Transport Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Thu Aug 23 15:27:23 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71212130F2B for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wqqjZgvofa28 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80171128CF2 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:27:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC6CB80E6C; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:27:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 41D58B80E6B; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180823222705.41D58B80E6B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8453_on_Framework_for_Abstraction_and_C?= =?utf-8?q?ontrol_of_TE_Networks_=28ACTN=29?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, teas@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8453

        Title:      Framework for Abstraction and Control 
                    of TE Networks (ACTN) 
        Author:     D. Ceccarelli, Ed.,
                    Y. Lee
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com, 
                    leeyoung@huawei.com
        Pages:      42
        Characters: 90463
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework-15.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8453

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8453

Traffic Engineered (TE) networks have a variety of mechanisms to
facilitate the separation of the data plane and control plane.  They
also have a range of management and provisioning protocols to
configure and activate network resources.  These mechanisms represent
key technologies for enabling flexible and dynamic networking.  The
term "Traffic Engineered network" refers to a network that uses any
connection-oriented technology under the control of a distributed or
centralized control plane to support dynamic provisioning of end-to-
end connectivity.

Abstraction of network resources is a technique that can be applied
to a single network domain or across multiple domains to create a
single virtualized network that is under the control of a network
operator or the customer of the operator that actually owns the
network resources.

This document provides a framework for Abstraction and Control of TE
Networks (ACTN) to support virtual network services and connectivity
services.

This document is a product of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Aug 24 13:27:17 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF38130E5B for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hY-HztDzgBgV for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BFFE130DC0 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893CDB8163F; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B8A11B8163F; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180824202657.B8A11B8163F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8437_on_IMAP_UNAUTHENTICATE_Extension_f?= =?utf-8?q?or_Connection_Reuse?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: extra@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8437

        Title:      IMAP UNAUTHENTICATE Extension for 
                    Connection Reuse 
        Author:     C. Newman
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    chris.newman@oracle.com
        Pages:      11
        Characters: 23574
        Updates:    RFC 3501

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-extra-imap-unauth-01.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8437

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8437

This specification extends the Internet Message Access Protocol
(IMAP) to allow an administrative client to reuse the same IMAP
connection on behalf of multiple IMAP user identities.

This document is a product of the Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Aug 24 13:27:35 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A2F130EB3 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wzH4wNZsNByA for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83564130E98 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC5EB81646; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CA8C8B81646; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180824202702.CA8C8B81646@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8438_on_IMAP_Extension_for_STATUS=3DSIZ?= =?utf-8?q?E?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: extra@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8438

        Title:      IMAP Extension for STATUS=SIZE 
        Author:     S. Bosch
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    stephan.bosch@dovecot.fi
        Pages:      6
        Characters: 10672
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-extra-imap-status-size-02.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8438

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8438

This document adds a new capability called "STATUS=SIZE" to the
Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP).  It allows retrieving the
total storage size of a mailbox with a single STATUS command rather
than retrieving and summing the sizes of all individual messages in
that mailbox.

This document is a product of the Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Aug 24 14:21:41 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435ED130E1E for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:21:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8CFQT019IqD5 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E9A4130DDD for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894E0B810D3; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 33D81B810D3; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180824212121.33D81B810D3@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8409_on_The_Entity_Category_Security_As?= =?utf-8?q?sertion_Markup_Language_=28SAML=29_Attribute_Types?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8409

        Title:      The Entity Category Security Assertion 
                    Markup Language (SAML) Attribute Types 
        Author:     I. Young, Ed.,
                    L. Johansson, 
                    S. Cantor
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     Independent
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    ian@iay.org.uk, 
                    leifj@sunet.se, 
                    cantor.2@osu.edu
        Pages:      12
        Characters: 24924
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-young-entity-category-07.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8409

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8409

This document describes two SAML entity attributes: one that can be
used to assign category membership semantics to an entity and another
for use in claiming interoperation with or support for entities in
such categories.

This document is a product of the working group process of the
Research and Education FEDerations (REFEDS) group.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Aug 24 14:30:27 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE1D129385 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jMK0K_dT8zep for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BED0A12DD85 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6FBB81224; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D23CCB81221; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180824213008.D23CCB81221@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8434_on_Requirements_for_Parallel_NFS_?= =?utf-8?q?=28pNFS=29_Layout_Types?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8434

        Title:      Requirements for Parallel NFS (pNFS) 
                    Layout Types 
        Author:     T. Haynes
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    loghyr@gmail.com
        Pages:      17
        Characters: 39625
        Updates:    RFC 5661

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-nfsv4-layout-types-13.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8434

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8434

This document defines the requirements that individual Parallel NFS
(pNFS) layout types need to meet in order to work within the pNFS
framework as defined in RFC 5661.  In so doing, this document aims to
clearly distinguish between requirements for pNFS as a whole and
those specifically directed to the pNFS file layout.  The lack of a
clear separation between the two sets of requirements has been
troublesome for those specifying and evaluating new layout types.  In
this regard, this document updates RFC 5661.


This document is a product of the Network File System Version 4 Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Aug 24 14:30:40 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE4B130E5E for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DIGjMExCknTM for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D531130EC1 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71DAB81230; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 252DBB8122B; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180824213013.252DBB8122B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 14:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8435_on_Parallel_NFS_=28pNFS=29_Flexibl?= =?utf-8?q?e_File_Layout?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8435

        Title:      Parallel NFS (pNFS) Flexible File Layout
        Author:     B. Halevy, 
                    T. Haynes
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    bhalevy@gmail.com, 
                    loghyr@gmail.com
        Pages:      42
        Characters: 98505
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-nfsv4-flex-files-19.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8435

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8435

Parallel NFS (pNFS) allows a separation between the metadata (onto a
metadata server) and data (onto a storage device) for a file.  The
flexible file layout type is defined in this document as an extension
to pNFS that allows the use of storage devices that require only a
limited degree of interaction with the metadata server and use
already-existing protocols.  Client-side mirroring is also added to
provide replication of files.


This document is a product of the Network File System Version 4 Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Mon Aug 27 12:02:52 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE023130EFF for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RVclmDW6TUeX for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CD3212F1AB for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5857CB80C3C; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 75379B80C3A; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180827190231.75379B80C3A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8433_on_A_Simpler_Method_for_Resolving_?= =?utf-8?q?Alert-Info_URNs?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8433

        Title:      A Simpler Method for Resolving 
                    Alert-Info URNs 
        Author:     D. Worley
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     Independent
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    worley@ariadne.com
        Pages:      45
        Characters: 89902
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-worley-alert-info-fsm-10.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8433

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8433

The "alert" namespace of Uniform Resource Names (URNs) can be used in
the Alert-Info header field of Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
requests and responses to inform a voice over IP (VoIP) telephone
(user agent) of the characteristics of the call that the user agent
has originated or terminated.  The user agent must resolve the URNs
into a signal; that is, it must select the best available signal to
present to its user to indicate the characteristics of the call.

RFC 7462 describes a non-normative algorithm for signal selection.
This document describes a more efficient alternative algorithm: a
user agent's designer can, based on the user agent's signals and
their meanings, construct a finite state machine (FSM) to process the
URNs to select a signal in a way that obeys the restrictions given in
the definition of the "alert" URN namespace.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Aug 31 17:56:27 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12A4130E83 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Tb4ia9A5K4I for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C3E7130DBE for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AD9B8078E; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4FA6AB806DD; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180901005602.4FA6AB806DD@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8428_on_Sensor_Measurement_Lists_=28Sen?= =?utf-8?b?TUwp?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, core@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8428

        Title:      Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML) 
        Author:     C. Jennings, 
                    Z. Shelby,
                    J. Arkko, 
                    A. Keranen,
                    C. Bormann
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    fluffy@iii.ca, 
                    zach.shelby@arm.com, 
                    jari.arkko@piuha.net,
                    ari.keranen@ericsson.com, 
                    cabo@tzi.org
        Pages:      54
        Characters: 114470
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-core-senml-16.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8428

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8428

This specification defines a format for representing simple sensor
measurements and device parameters in Sensor Measurement Lists
(SenML).  Representations are defined in JavaScript Object Notation
(JSON), Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR), Extensible
Markup Language (XML), and Efficient XML Interchange (EXI), which
share the common SenML data model.  A simple sensor, such as a
temperature sensor, could use one of these media types in protocols
such as HTTP or the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) to
transport the measurements of the sensor or to be configured.

This document is a product of the Constrained RESTful Environments Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Fri Aug 31 17:56:46 2018
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D06130ECD for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HH9hZ9AFmai3 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF28E130EB2 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE70B80831; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4B0ECB80831; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20180901005607.4B0ECB80831@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8443_on_Personal_Assertion_Token_=28PAS?= =?utf-8?q?SporT=29_Extension_for_Resource_Priority_Authorization?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, stir@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8443

        Title:      Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) Extension 
                    for Resource Priority Authorization 
        Author:     R. Singh, 
                    M. Dolly,
                    S. Das, 
                    A. Nguyen
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       August 2018
        Mailbox:    rsingh@vencorelabs.com, 
                    md3135@att.com, 
                    sdas@vencorelabs.com, 
                    an.p.nguyen@hq.dhs.gov
        Pages:      10
        Characters: 21623
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-stir-rph-06.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8443

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8443

This document extends the Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT)
specification defined in RFC 8225 to allow the inclusion of
cryptographically signed assertions of authorization for the values
populated in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) 'Resource-Priority'
header field, which is used for communications resource
prioritization.

This document is a product of the Secure Telephone Identity Revisited Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org
