From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Nov 5 22:31:34 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F044120AB0 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:31:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yi-lO5Qy4gIZ for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:31:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B368312082B for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:31:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6951F4073A; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:31:14 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id AB220F4073A; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:31:12 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191106063112.AB220F4073A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:31:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8652_on_A_YANG_Data_Model_for_the_Inter?= =?utf-8?q?net_Group_Management_Protocol_=28IGMP=29and=C2=A0Multicast_List?= =?utf-8?q?ener_Discovery_=28MLD=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pim@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" QSBuZXcgUmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgQ29tbWVudHMgaXMgbm93IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBpbiBvbmxpbmUgUkZD IGxpYnJhcmllcy4KCiAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgUkZDIDg2NTIKCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGU6ICAg ICAgQSBZQU5HIERhdGEgTW9kZWwgZm9yIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHRoZSBJbnRlcm5l dCBHcm91cCBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IFByb3RvY29sIChJR01QKSAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBh bmTCoE11bHRpY2FzdCBMaXN0ZW5lciBEaXNjb3ZlcnkgKE1MRCkgCiAgICAgICAgQXV0aG9yOiAg ICAgWC4gTGl1LCAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBGLiBHdW8sCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgTS4gU2l2YWt1bWFyLCAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBQLiBNY0FsbGlzdGVyLAogICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEEuIFBldGVyCiAgICAgICAgU3RhdHVzOiAgICAgU3RhbmRhcmRzIFRy YWNrCiAgICAgICAgU3RyZWFtOiAgICAgSUVURgogICAgICAgIERhdGU6ICAgICAgIE5vdmVtYmVy IDIwMTkKICAgICAgICBNYWlsYm94OiAgICB4dWZlbmcubGl1LmlldGZAZ21haWwuY29tLAogICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGd1b2ZlbmdAaHVhd2VpLmNvbSwKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBz aXZha3VtYXIubWFoZXNoQGdtYWlsLmNvbSwKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBwZXRlLm1jYWxs aXN0ZXJAbWV0YXN3aXRjaC5jb20sCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgYW5pc2guaWV0ZkBnbWFp bC5jb20KICAgICAgICBQYWdlczogICAgICA0NQogICAgICAgIFVwZGF0ZXMvT2Jzb2xldGVzL1Nl ZUFsc286ICAgTm9uZQoKICAgICAgICBJLUQgVGFnOiAgICBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXBpbS1pZ21wLW1s ZC15YW5nLTE1LnR4dAoKICAgICAgICBVUkw6ICAgICAgICBodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9y Lm9yZy9pbmZvL3JmYzg2NTIKCiAgICAgICAgRE9JOiAgICAgICAgMTAuMTc0ODcvUkZDODY1MgoK VGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBkZWZpbmVzIGEgWUFORyBkYXRhIG1vZGVsIHRoYXQgY2FuIGJlIHVzZWQg dG8gY29uZmlndXJlCmFuZCBtYW5hZ2UgSW50ZXJuZXQgR3JvdXAgTWFuYWdlbWVudCBQcm90b2Nv bCAoSUdNUCkgYW5kIE11bHRpY2FzdApMaXN0ZW5lciBEaXNjb3ZlcnkgKE1MRCkgZGV2aWNlcy4K ClRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgaXMgYSBwcm9kdWN0IG9mIHRoZSBQcm90b2NvbHMgZm9yIElQIE11bHRp Y2FzdCBXb3JraW5nIEdyb3VwIG9mIHRoZSBJRVRGLgoKVGhpcyBpcyBub3cgYSBQcm9wb3NlZCBT dGFuZGFyZC4KClNUQU5EQVJEUyBUUkFDSzogVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBzcGVjaWZpZXMgYW4gSW50 ZXJuZXQgU3RhbmRhcmRzIFRyYWNrCnByb3RvY29sIGZvciB0aGUgSW50ZXJuZXQgY29tbXVuaXR5 LCBhbmQgcmVxdWVzdHMgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiBhbmQgc3VnZ2VzdGlvbnMKZm9yIGltcHJvdmVtZW50 cy4gIFBsZWFzZSByZWZlciB0byB0aGUgY3VycmVudCBlZGl0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBPZmZpY2lhbApJ bnRlcm5ldCBQcm90b2NvbCBTdGFuZGFyZHMgKGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL3N0 YW5kYXJkcykgZm9yIHRoZSAKc3RhbmRhcmRpemF0aW9uIHN0YXRlIGFuZCBzdGF0dXMgb2YgdGhp cyBwcm90b2NvbC4gIERpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbiBvZiB0aGlzIAptZW1vIGlzIHVubGltaXRlZC4KClRo aXMgYW5ub3VuY2VtZW50IGlzIHNlbnQgdG8gdGhlIElFVEYtQW5ub3VuY2UgYW5kIHJmYy1kaXN0 IGxpc3RzLgpUbyBzdWJzY3JpYmUgb3IgdW5zdWJzY3JpYmUsIHNlZQogIGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmll dGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vaWV0Zi1hbm5vdW5jZQogIGh0dHBzOi8vbWFpbG1hbi5y ZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3JmYy1kaXN0CgpGb3Igc2VhcmNoaW5nIHRo ZSBSRkMgc2VyaWVzLCBzZWUgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvc2VhcmNoCkZvciBk b3dubG9hZGluZyBSRkNzLCBzZWUgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvcmV0cmlldmUv YnVsawoKUmVxdWVzdHMgZm9yIHNwZWNpYWwgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIHNob3VsZCBiZSBhZGRyZXNz ZWQgdG8gZWl0aGVyIHRoZQphdXRob3Igb2YgdGhlIFJGQyBpbiBxdWVzdGlvbiwgb3IgdG8gcmZj LWVkaXRvckByZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy4gIFVubGVzcwpzcGVjaWZpY2FsbHkgbm90ZWQgb3RoZXJ3 aXNlIG9uIHRoZSBSRkMgaXRzZWxmLCBhbGwgUkZDcyBhcmUgZm9yCnVubGltaXRlZCBkaXN0cmli dXRpb24uCgoKVGhlIFJGQyBFZGl0b3IgVGVhbQpBc3NvY2lhdGlvbiBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IFNvbHV0 aW9ucywgTExDCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f CnJmYy1kaXN0IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApyZmMtZGlzdEByZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZwpodHRwczovL3d3 dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3JmYy1kaXN0Cmh0dHA6Ly93d3cucmZj LWVkaXRvci5vcmcK From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Nov 5 22:31:51 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8684120C90 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:31:51 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n02eexXlvfWZ for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:31:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFA65120C54 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:31:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC6AF4073D; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:31:18 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D1CF8F4073D; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:31:17 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191106063117.D1CF8F4073D@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 22:31:17 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8671_on_Support_for_Adj-RIB-Out_in_the_?= =?utf-8?q?BGP_Monitoring_Protocol_=28BMP=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, grow@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8671 Title: Support for Adj-RIB-Out in the BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) Author: T. Evens, S. Bayraktar, P. Lucente, P. Mi, S. Zhuang Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: November 2019 Mailbox: tievens@cisco.com, serpil@cisco.com, paolo@ntt.net, Penghui.Mi@gmail.com, zhuangshunwan@huawei.com Pages: 9 Updates: RFC 7854 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8671 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8671 The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) only defines access to the Adj-RIB-In Routing Information Bases (RIBs). This document updates BMP (RFC 7854) by adding access to the Adj-RIB-Out RIBs. It also adds a new flag to the peer header to distinguish between Adj-RIB-In and Adj-RIB-Out. This document is a product of the Global Routing Operations Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon Nov 11 16:13:27 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5705120893 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:13:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FIbPS4WEqVB5 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:13:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C65531201E0 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:13:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065DAF4073F; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:13:21 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 84DF6F4073E; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:13:19 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191112001319.84DF6F4073E@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 16:13:19 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8658_on_RADIUS_Attributes_for_Softwire_?= =?utf-8?q?Mechanisms_Based_on_Address_plus_Port_=28A+P=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: softwires@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8658 Title: RADIUS Attributes for Softwire Mechanisms Based on Address plus Port (A+P) Author: S. Jiang, Ed., Y. Fu, Ed., C. Xie, T. Li, M. Boucadair, Ed. Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: November 2019 Mailbox: jiangsheng@huawei.com, eleven711711@foxmail.com, xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn, peter416733@gmail.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Pages: 34 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-26.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8658 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8658 IPv4-over-IPv6 transition mechanisms provide IPv4 connectivity services over IPv6 native networks during the IPv4/IPv6 coexistence period. DHCPv6 options have been defined to configure clients for Lightweight 4over6, Mapping of Address and Port with Encapsulation (MAP-E), Mapping of Address and Port using Translation (MAP-T) unicast softwire mechanisms, and multicast softwires. However, in many networks, configuration information is stored in an Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) server, which utilizes the Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) protocol to provide centralized management for users. When a new transition mechanism is developed, new RADIUS attributes need to be defined correspondingly. This document defines new RADIUS attributes to carry softwire configuration parameters based on Address plus Port from a AAA server to a Broadband Network Gateway. Both unicast and multicast attributes are covered. This document is a product of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sun Nov 17 01:00:32 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B0912008D for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:00:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uJy5Njf3yZ9O for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:00:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6659412007A for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:00:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73C59F406D5; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:00:19 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0598CF406D2; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:00:18 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191117090018.0598CF406D2@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:00:18 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8675_on_A_YANG_Data_Model_for_Tunnel_In?= =?utf-8?q?terface_Types?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: softwires@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8675 Title: A YANG Data Model for Tunnel Interface Types Author: M. Boucadair, I. Farrer, R. Asati Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: November 2019 Mailbox: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, ian.farrer@telekom.de, rajiva@cisco.com Pages: 16 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8675 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8675 This document specifies the initial version of a YANG module "iana-tunnel-type", which contains a collection of IANA-maintained YANG identities used as interface types for tunnel interfaces. The module reflects the "tunnelType" registry maintained by IANA. The latest revision of this YANG module can be obtained from the IANA website. Tunnel type values are not directly added to the Tunnel Interface Types YANG module; they must instead be added to the "tunnelType" IANA registry. Once a new tunnel type registration is made by IANA for a new tunneling scheme or even an existing one that is not already listed in the current registry (e.g., LISP, NSH), IANA will update the Tunnel Interface Types YANG module accordingly. Some of the IETF-defined tunneling techniques are not listed in the current IANA registry. It is not the intent of this document to update the existing IANA registry with a comprehensive list of tunnel technologies. Registrants must follow the IETF registration procedure for interface types whenever a new tunnel type is needed. This document is a product of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sun Nov 17 01:01:14 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2866D1200B1 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:01:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SALqV7wBu6m9 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:01:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A24D120850 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:01:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4536F40705; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:00:50 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3AFA3F40704; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:00:50 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191117090050.3AFA3F40704@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 01:00:50 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8676_on_YANG_Modules_for_IPv4-in-IPv6_A?= =?utf-8?q?ddress_plus_Port_=28A=E2=81=A0+P=29_Softwires?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: softwires@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" QSBuZXcgUmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgQ29tbWVudHMgaXMgbm93IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBpbiBvbmxpbmUgUkZD IGxpYnJhcmllcy4KCiAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgUkZDIDg2NzYKCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGU6ICAg ICAgWUFORyBNb2R1bGVzIGZvciBJUHY0LWluLUlQdjYgQWRkcmVzcyAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICBwbHVzIFBvcnQgKEHigaArUCkgU29mdHdpcmVzIAogICAgICAgIEF1dGhvcjogICAgIEku IEZhcnJlciwgRWQuLAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIE0uIEJvdWNhZGFpciwgRWQuCiAgICAg ICAgU3RhdHVzOiAgICAgU3RhbmRhcmRzIFRyYWNrCiAgICAgICAgU3RyZWFtOiAgICAgSUVURgog ICAgICAgIERhdGU6ICAgICAgIE5vdmVtYmVyIDIwMTkKICAgICAgICBNYWlsYm94OiAgICBpYW4u ZmFycmVyQHRlbGVrb20uZGUsIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIG1vaGFtZWQuYm91Y2FkYWly QG9yYW5nZS5jb20KICAgICAgICBQYWdlczogICAgICA0NgogICAgICAgIFVwZGF0ZXMvT2Jzb2xl dGVzL1NlZUFsc286ICAgTm9uZQoKICAgICAgICBJLUQgVGFnOiAgICBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXNvZnR3 aXJlLXlhbmctMTYudHh0CgogICAgICAgIFVSTDogICAgICAgIGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0 b3Iub3JnL2luZm8vcmZjODY3NgoKICAgICAgICBET0k6ICAgICAgICAxMC4xNzQ4Ny9SRkM4Njc2 CgpUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGRlZmluZXMgWUFORyBtb2R1bGVzIGZvciB0aGUgY29uZmlndXJhdGlv biBhbmQKb3BlcmF0aW9uIG9mIElQdjQtaW4tSVB2NiBzb2Z0d2lyZSBCb3JkZXIgUmVsYXlzIGFu ZCBDdXN0b21lcgpQcmVtaXNlcyBFcXVpcG1lbnQgZm9yIHRoZSBMaWdodHdlaWdodCA0b3ZlcjYs IE1hcHBpbmcgb2YgQWRkcmVzcyBhbmQKUG9ydCB3aXRoIEVuY2Fwc3VsYXRpb24gKE1BUC1FKSwg YW5kIE1hcHBpbmcgb2YgQWRkcmVzcyBhbmQgUG9ydAp1c2luZyBUcmFuc2xhdGlvbiAoTUFQLVQp IHNvZnR3aXJlIG1lY2hhbmlzbXMuCgpUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGlzIGEgcHJvZHVjdCBvZiB0aGUg U29mdHdpcmVzIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgb2YgdGhlIElFVEYuCgpUaGlzIGlzIG5vdyBhIFByb3Bv c2VkIFN0YW5kYXJkLgoKU1RBTkRBUkRTIFRSQUNLOiBUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHNwZWNpZmllcyBh biBJbnRlcm5ldCBTdGFuZGFyZHMgVHJhY2sKcHJvdG9jb2wgZm9yIHRoZSBJbnRlcm5ldCBjb21t dW5pdHksIGFuZCByZXF1ZXN0cyBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIGFuZCBzdWdnZXN0aW9ucwpmb3IgaW1wcm92 ZW1lbnRzLiAgUGxlYXNlIHJlZmVyIHRvIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IGVkaXRpb24gb2YgdGhlIE9mZmlj aWFsCkludGVybmV0IFByb3RvY29sIFN0YW5kYXJkcyAoaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5v cmcvc3RhbmRhcmRzKSBmb3IgdGhlIApzdGFuZGFyZGl6YXRpb24gc3RhdGUgYW5kIHN0YXR1cyBv ZiB0aGlzIHByb3RvY29sLiAgRGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIG9mIHRoaXMgCm1lbW8gaXMgdW5saW1pdGVk LgoKVGhpcyBhbm5vdW5jZW1lbnQgaXMgc2VudCB0byB0aGUgSUVURi1Bbm5vdW5jZSBhbmQgcmZj LWRpc3QgbGlzdHMuClRvIHN1YnNjcmliZSBvciB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSwgc2VlCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly93 d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pZXRmLWFubm91bmNlCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly9tYWls bWFuLnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcmZjLWRpc3QKCkZvciBzZWFyY2hp bmcgdGhlIFJGQyBzZXJpZXMsIHNlZSBodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9zZWFyY2gK Rm9yIGRvd25sb2FkaW5nIFJGQ3MsIHNlZSBodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9yZXRy aWV2ZS9idWxrCgpSZXF1ZXN0cyBmb3Igc3BlY2lhbCBkaXN0cmlidXRpb24gc2hvdWxkIGJlIGFk ZHJlc3NlZCB0byBlaXRoZXIgdGhlCmF1dGhvciBvZiB0aGUgUkZDIGluIHF1ZXN0aW9uLCBvciB0 byByZmMtZWRpdG9yQHJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnLiAgVW5sZXNzCnNwZWNpZmljYWxseSBub3RlZCBv dGhlcndpc2Ugb24gdGhlIFJGQyBpdHNlbGYsIGFsbCBSRkNzIGFyZSBmb3IKdW5saW1pdGVkIGRp c3RyaWJ1dGlvbi4KCgpUaGUgUkZDIEVkaXRvciBUZWFtCkFzc29jaWF0aW9uIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQg U29sdXRpb25zLCBMTEMKCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fXwpyZmMtZGlzdCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKcmZjLWRpc3RAcmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcKaHR0 cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9yZmMtZGlzdApodHRwOi8v d3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnCg== From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sun Nov 17 02:11:58 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D561200B1 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 02:11:58 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tVAIRXg69SCD for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 02:11:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0BF912004D for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 02:11:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C298DF406F0; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 02:11:45 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3035FF406D5; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 02:11:44 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191117101144.3035FF406D5@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 02:11:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8650_on_Dynamic_Subscription_to_YANG_Ev?= =?utf-8?q?ents_and_Datastores_over_RESTCONF?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, netconf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8650 Title: Dynamic Subscription to YANG Events and Datastores over RESTCONF Author: E. Voit, R. Rahman, E. Nilsen-Nygaard, A. Clemm, A. Bierman Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: November 2019 Mailbox: evoit@cisco.com, rrahman@cisco.com, einarnn@cisco.com, ludwig@clemm.org, andy@yumaworks.com Pages: 23 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-15.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8650 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8650 This document provides a RESTCONF binding to the dynamic subscription capability of both subscribed notifications and YANG-Push. This document is a product of the Network Configuration Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon Nov 18 02:11:59 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2F21207FE for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 02:11:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EHtN1mNC2E-V for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 02:11:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5C2A120851 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 02:11:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53318F40710; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 02:11:44 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1C653F4070D; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 02:11:44 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191118101144.1C653F4070D@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 02:11:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8677_on_Name-Based_Service_Function_For?= =?utf-8?q?warder_=28nSFF=29_Component_within_aService_Function_Chaining?= =?utf-8?b?wqAoU0ZDKSBGcmFtZXdvcms=?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" QSBuZXcgUmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgQ29tbWVudHMgaXMgbm93IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBpbiBvbmxpbmUgUkZD IGxpYnJhcmllcy4KCiAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgUkZDIDg2NzcKCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGU6ICAg ICAgTmFtZS1CYXNlZCBTZXJ2aWNlIEZ1bmN0aW9uIEZvcndhcmRlciAoblNGRikgCiAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgQ29tcG9uZW50IHdpdGhpbiBhIFNlcnZpY2UgRnVuY3Rpb24gQ2hhaW5pbmfC oChTRkMpIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEZyYW1ld29yayAKICAgICAgICBBdXRob3I6ICAg ICBELiBUcm9zc2VuLAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEQuIFB1cmtheWFzdGhhLAogICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgIEEuIFJhaG1hbgogICAgICAgIFN0YXR1czogICAgIEluZm9ybWF0aW9uYWwK ICAgICAgICBTdHJlYW06ICAgICBJbmRlcGVuZGVudAogICAgICAgIERhdGU6ICAgICAgIE5vdmVt YmVyIDIwMTkKICAgICAgICBNYWlsYm94OiAgICBEaXJrLlRyb3NzZW5ASW50ZXJEaWdpdGFsLmNv bSwgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgRGViYXNoaXNoLlB1cmtheWFzdGhhQEludGVyRGlnaXRh bC5jb20sIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEFrYmFyLlJhaG1hbkBJbnRlckRpZ2l0YWwuY29t CiAgICAgICAgUGFnZXM6ICAgICAgMjQKICAgICAgICBVcGRhdGVzL09ic29sZXRlcy9TZWVBbHNv OiAgIE5vbmUKCiAgICAgICAgSS1EIFRhZzogICAgZHJhZnQtdHJvc3Nlbi1zZmMtbmFtZS1iYXNl ZC1zZmYtMDcudHh0CgogICAgICAgIFVSTDogICAgICAgIGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iu b3JnL2luZm8vcmZjODY3NwoKICAgICAgICBET0k6ICAgICAgICAxMC4xNzQ4Ny9SRkM4Njc3CgpB ZG9wdGlvbiBvZiBjbG91ZCBhbmQgZm9nIHRlY2hub2xvZ3kgYWxsb3dzIG9wZXJhdG9ycyB0byBk ZXBsb3kgYQpzaW5nbGUgIlNlcnZpY2UgRnVuY3Rpb24iIChTRikgdG8gbXVsdGlwbGUgImV4ZWN1 dGlvbiBsb2NhdGlvbnMiLiAKVGhlIGRlY2lzaW9uIHRvIHN0ZWVyIHRyYWZmaWMgdG8gYSBzcGVj aWZpYyBsb2NhdGlvbiBtYXkgY2hhbmdlCmZyZXF1ZW50bHkgYmFzZWQgb24gbG9hZCwgcHJveGlt aXR5LCBldGMuIFVuZGVyIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IFNlcnZpY2UKRnVuY3Rpb24gQ2hhaW5pbmcgKFNG QykgZnJhbWV3b3JrLCBzdGVlcmluZyB0cmFmZmljIGR5bmFtaWNhbGx5IHRvCnRoZSBkaWZmZXJl bnQgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGVuZHBvaW50cyByZXF1aXJlcyBhIHNwZWNpZmljICJyZWNoYWluaW5nIiwK aS5lLiwgYSBjaGFuZ2UgaW4gdGhlIHNlcnZpY2UgZnVuY3Rpb24gcGF0aCByZWZsZWN0aW5nIHRo ZSBkaWZmZXJlbnQKSVAgZW5kcG9pbnRzIHRvIGJlIHVzZWQgZm9yIHRoZSBuZXcgZXhlY3V0aW9u IHBvaW50cy4gIFRoaXMgcHJvY2VkdXJlCm1heSBiZSBjb21wbGV4IGFuZCB0YWtlIHRpbWUuIElu IG9yZGVyIHRvIHNpbXBsaWZ5IHJlY2hhaW5pbmcgYW5kCnJlZHVjZSB0aGUgdGltZSB0byBjb21w bGV0ZSB0aGUgcHJvY2VkdXJlLCB3ZSBkaXNjdXNzIHNlcGFyYXRpbmcgdGhlCmxvZ2ljYWwgU2Vy dmljZSBGdW5jdGlvbiBQYXRoIChTRlApIGZyb20gdGhlIHNwZWNpZmljIGV4ZWN1dGlvbgplbmRw b2ludHMuIFRoaXMgY2FuIGJlIGRvbmUgYnkgaWRlbnRpZnlpbmcgdGhlIFNGcyB1c2luZyBhIG5h bWUKcmF0aGVyIHRoYW4gYSByb3V0YWJsZSBJUCBlbmRwb2ludCAob3IgTGF5ZXIgMiBhZGRyZXNz KS4gVGhpcwpkb2N1bWVudCBkZXNjcmliZXMgdGhlIG5lY2Vzc2FyeSBleHRlbnNpb25zLCBhZGRp dGlvbmFsIGZ1bmN0aW9ucywKYW5kIHByb3RvY29sIGRldGFpbHMgaW4gdGhlIFNlcnZpY2UgRnVu Y3Rpb24gRm9yd2FyZGVyIChTRkYpIHRvCmhhbmRsZSBuYW1lLWJhc2VkIHJlbGF0aW9uc2hpcHMu IAoKVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBwcmVzZW50cyBJbnRlckRpZ2l0YWwncyBhcHByb2FjaCB0byBuYW1l LWJhc2VkIFNGQy4gSXQKZG9lcyBub3QgcmVwcmVzZW50IElFVEYgY29uc2Vuc3VzIGFuZCBpcyBw cmVzZW50ZWQgaGVyZSBzbyB0aGF0IHRoZQpTRkMgY29tbXVuaXR5IG1heSBiZW5lZml0IGZyb20g Y29uc2lkZXJpbmcgdGhpcyBtZWNoYW5pc20gYW5kIHRoZQpwb3NzaWJpbGl0eSBvZiBpdHMgdXNl IGluIHRoZSBlZGdlIGRhdGEgY2VudGVycy4KCgpJTkZPUk1BVElPTkFMOiBUaGlzIG1lbW8gcHJv dmlkZXMgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gZm9yIHRoZSBJbnRlcm5ldCBjb21tdW5pdHkuCkl0IGRvZXMgbm90 IHNwZWNpZnkgYW4gSW50ZXJuZXQgc3RhbmRhcmQgb2YgYW55IGtpbmQuIERpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbiBv Zgp0aGlzIG1lbW8gaXMgdW5saW1pdGVkLgoKVGhpcyBhbm5vdW5jZW1lbnQgaXMgc2VudCB0byB0 aGUgSUVURi1Bbm5vdW5jZSBhbmQgcmZjLWRpc3QgbGlzdHMuClRvIHN1YnNjcmliZSBvciB1bnN1 YnNjcmliZSwgc2VlCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pZXRm LWFubm91bmNlCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly9tYWlsbWFuLnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGlu Zm8vcmZjLWRpc3QKCkZvciBzZWFyY2hpbmcgdGhlIFJGQyBzZXJpZXMsIHNlZSBodHRwczovL3d3 dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9zZWFyY2gKRm9yIGRvd25sb2FkaW5nIFJGQ3MsIHNlZSBodHRwczov L3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9yZXRyaWV2ZS9idWxrCgpSZXF1ZXN0cyBmb3Igc3BlY2lhbCBk aXN0cmlidXRpb24gc2hvdWxkIGJlIGFkZHJlc3NlZCB0byBlaXRoZXIgdGhlCmF1dGhvciBvZiB0 aGUgUkZDIGluIHF1ZXN0aW9uLCBvciB0byByZmMtZWRpdG9yQHJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnLiAgVW5s ZXNzCnNwZWNpZmljYWxseSBub3RlZCBvdGhlcndpc2Ugb24gdGhlIFJGQyBpdHNlbGYsIGFsbCBS RkNzIGFyZSBmb3IKdW5saW1pdGVkIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbi4KCgpUaGUgUkZDIEVkaXRvciBUZWFt CkFzc29jaWF0aW9uIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgU29sdXRpb25zLCBMTEMKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KcmZjLWRpc3QgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0CnJmYy1k aXN0QHJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlz dGluZm8vcmZjLWRpc3QKaHR0cDovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZwo= From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Nov 19 23:37:14 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA661209CD for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:37:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bcXVx94PGNv6 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:37:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 797931209D1 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:37:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E15F40723; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:36:57 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 61DEFF40720; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:36:56 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191120073656.61DEFF40720@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:36:56 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8657_on_Certification_Authority_Authori?= =?utf-8?q?zation_=28CAA=29_Record_Extensions_forAccount_URI_and_Automatic?= =?utf-8?q?_Certificate_Management_Environment_=28ACME=29Method_Binding?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, acme@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8657 Title: Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Record Extensions for Account URI and Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) Method Binding Author: H. Landau Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: November 2019 Mailbox: hlandau@devever.net Pages: 11 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-acme-caa-10.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8657 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8657 The Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) DNS record allows a domain to communicate an issuance policy to Certification Authorities (CAs) but only allows a domain to define a policy with CA-level granularity. However, the CAA specification (RFC 8659) also provides facilities for an extension to admit a more granular, CA-specific policy. This specification defines two such parameters: one allowing specific accounts of a CA to be identified by URIs and one allowing specific methods of domain control validation as defined by the Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) protocol to be required. This document is a product of the Automated Certificate Management Environment Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Nov 19 23:37:35 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E16120B27 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:37:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HTga0Zz2n-62 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21FB9120ADF for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686AEF4073F; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:37:04 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id DA0F6F4073B; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:37:03 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191120073703.DA0F6F4073B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:37:03 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8659_on_DNS_Certification_Authority_Aut?= =?utf-8?q?horization_=28CAA=29_Resource_Record?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: spasm@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8659 Title: DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record Author: P. Hallam-Baker, R. Stradling, J. Hoffman-Andrews Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: November 2019 Mailbox: phill@hallambaker.com, rob@sectigo.com, jsha@letsencrypt.org Pages: 17 Obsoletes: RFC 6844 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6844bis-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8659 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8659 The Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) DNS Resource Record allows a DNS domain name holder to specify one or more Certification Authorities (CAs) authorized to issue certificates for that domain name. CAA Resource Records allow a public CA to implement additional controls to reduce the risk of unintended certificate mis-issue. This document defines the syntax of the CAA record and rules for processing CAA records by CAs. This document obsoletes RFC 6844. This document is a product of the Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Nov 26 13:15:45 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85A2120ADC for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:15:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QsCmn3PvG5cf for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:15:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E62E6120ADF for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:15:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8709F40707; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:15:17 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4FF98F40704; Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:15:17 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191126211517.4FF98F40704@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 13:15:17 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8683_on_Additional_Deployment_Guideline?= =?utf-8?q?s_for_NAT64/464XLAT_in_Operator_and_Enterprise_Networks?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, v6ops@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8683 Title: Additional Deployment Guidelines for NAT64/464XLAT in Operator and Enterprise Networks Author: J. Palet Martinez Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: November 2019 Mailbox: jordi.palet@theipv6company.com Pages: 38 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment-08.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8683 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8683 This document describes how Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers (NAT64) (including 464XLAT) can be deployed in an IPv6 network -- whether it's cellular ISP, broadband ISP, or enterprise -- and the possible optimizations. This document also discusses issues to be considered when having IPv6-only connectivity, such as: a) DNS64, b) applications or devices that use literal IPv4 addresses or non-IPv6-compliant APIs, and c) IPv4-only hosts or applications. This document is a product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Nov 27 10:10:05 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1D5120BB4 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:10:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MtpsGEV8uWKj for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:10:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 747BF120900 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:10:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC77F40710; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:09:35 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9465CF406D8; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:09:34 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191127180934.9465CF406D8@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:09:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8673_on_HTTP_Random_Access_and_Live_Con?= =?utf-8?q?tent?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8673 Title: HTTP Random Access and Live Content Author: C. Pratt, D. Thakore, B. Stark Status: Experimental Stream: IETF Date: November 2019 Mailbox: pratt@acm.org, d.thakore@cablelabs.com, barbara.stark@att.com Pages: 10 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-httpbis-rand-access-live-04.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8673 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8673 To accommodate byte-range requests for content that has data appended over time, this document defines semantics that allow an HTTP client and a server to perform byte-range GET and HEAD requests that start at an arbitrary byte offset within the representation and end at an indeterminate offset. This document is a product of the HTTP Working Group of the IETF. EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Nov 27 10:50:37 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B49120B66 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:50:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mZL1oTKr8Jw9 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:50:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8073C120BA5 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:50:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F85F40723; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:50:08 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id EE8F4F4071D; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:50:07 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191127185007.EE8F4F4071D@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:50:07 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8687_on_OSPF_Routing_with_Cross-Address?= =?utf-8?q?_Family_Traffic_Engineering_Tunnels?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lsr@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8687 Title: OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels Author: A. Smirnov, A. Retana, M. Barnes Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: November 2019 Mailbox: as@cisco.com, alvaro.retana@futurewei.com, michael_barnes@usa.net Pages: 8 Updates: RFC 5786 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8687 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8687 When using Traffic Engineering (TE) in a dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 network, the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) TE Label Switched Path (LSP) infrastructure may be duplicated, even if the destination IPv4 and IPv6 addresses belong to the same remote router. In order to achieve an integrated MPLS TE LSP infrastructure, OSPF routes must be computed over MPLS TE tunnels created using information propagated in another OSPF instance. This issue is solved by advertising cross-address family (X-AF) OSPF TE information. This document describes an update to RFC 5786 that allows for the easy identification of a router's local X-AF IP addresses. This document is a product of the Link State Routing Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Nov 27 11:57:53 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E1A1209F1 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:57:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gOLYx9W1e3e1 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:57:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 266EB1209F3 for ; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:57:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78076F4071C; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:57:24 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id AEE8BF40710; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:57:23 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191127195723.AEE8BF40710@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:57:23 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8689_on_SMTP_Require_TLS_Option?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: uta@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8689 Title: SMTP Require TLS Option Author: J. Fenton Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: November 2019 Mailbox: fenton@bluepopcorn.net Pages: 16 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-uta-smtp-require-tls-09.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8689 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8689 The SMTP STARTTLS option, used in negotiating transport-level encryption of SMTP connections, is not as useful from a security standpoint as it might be because of its opportunistic nature; message delivery is, by default, prioritized over security. This document describes an SMTP service extension, REQUIRETLS, and a message header field, TLS-Required. If the REQUIRETLS option or TLS-Required message header field is used when sending a message, it asserts a request on the part of the message sender to override the default negotiation of TLS, either by requiring that TLS be negotiated when the message is relayed or by requesting that recipient-side policy mechanisms such as MTA-STS and DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) be ignored when relaying a message for which security is unimportant. This document is a product of the Using TLS in Applications Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org