From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Dec 4 21:23:54 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3AE120981 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:23:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gOgFPGDtASPT for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:23:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5758A1200BA for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:23:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975B8F4071A; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:23:48 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 28A39F4071A; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:23:47 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191205052347.28A39F4071A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:23:47 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8674_on_The_=22safe=22_HTTP_Preference?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8674 Title: The "safe" HTTP Preference Author: M. Nottingham Status: Informational Stream: Independent Date: December 2019 Mailbox: mnot@mnot.net Pages: 7 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-nottingham-safe-hint-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8674 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8674 This specification defines a preference for HTTP requests that expresses a desire to avoid objectionable content, according to the definition of that term by the origin server. This specification does not define a precise semantic for "safe". Rather, the term is interpreted by the server and within the scope of each web site that chooses to act upon this information. Support for this preference by clients and servers is optional. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Dec 4 21:24:43 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02211200C3 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:24:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GjzBbI3zeC88 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:24:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17ABD12095A for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:24:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AB6F4071B; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:24:32 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 83D8CF40724; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:24:31 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191205052431.83D8CF40724@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 21:24:31 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8688_on_A_Session_Initiation_Protocol_?= =?utf-8?q?=28SIP=29_Response_Code_for_Rejected_Calls?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, sipcore@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8688 Title: A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Response Code for Rejected Calls Author: E.W. Burger, B. Nagda Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: eburger@standardstrack.com, nagdab@gmail.com Pages: 22 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-09.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8688 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8688 This document defines the 608 (Rejected) Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) response code. This response code enables calling parties to learn that an intermediary rejected their call attempt. No one will deliver, and thus answer, the call. As a 6xx code, the caller will be aware that future attempts to contact the same User Agent Server will likely fail. The initial use case driving the need for the 608 response code is when the intermediary is an analytics engine. In this case, the rejection is by a machine or other process. This contrasts with the 607 (Unwanted) SIP response code in which a human at the target User Agent Server indicates the user did not want the call. In some jurisdictions, this distinction is important. This document also defines the use of the Call-Info header field in 608 responses to enable rejected callers to contact entities that blocked their calls in error. This provides a remediation mechanism for legal callers that find their calls blocked. This document is a product of the Session Initiation Protocol Core Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Dec 6 13:53:24 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA6212011E for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sI-2gtI2Xz7Z for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F228712002F for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510ECF40727; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:17 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0A405F406F6; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:16 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191206215316.0A405F406F6@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:16 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8660_on_Segment_Routing_with_the_MPLS_D?= =?utf-8?q?ata_Plane?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, spring@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8660 Title: Segment Routing with the MPLS Data Plane Author: A. Bashandy, Ed., C. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, B. Decraene, S. Litkowski, R. Shakir Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: abashandy.ietf@gmail.com, cfilsfil@cisco.com, stefano@previdi.net, bruno.decraene@orange.com, slitkows.ietf@gmail.com, robjs@google.com Pages: 29 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-22.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8660 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8660 Segment Routing (SR) leverages the source-routing paradigm. A node steers a packet through a controlled set of instructions, called segments, by prepending the packet with an SR header. In the MPLS data plane, the SR header is instantiated through a label stack. This document specifies the forwarding behavior to allow instantiating SR over the MPLS data plane (SR-MPLS). This document is a product of the Source Packet Routing in Networking Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Dec 6 13:53:45 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6DF1209C8 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qpLr2fsXgEhx for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B4D8120169 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91ABEF4073E; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:23 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8F7A4F4073C; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:22 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191206215322.8F7A4F4073C@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8661_on_Segment_Routing_MPLS_Interworki?= =?utf-8?q?ng_with_LDP?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, spring@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8661 Title: Segment Routing MPLS Interworking with LDP Author: A. Bashandy, Ed., C. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, B. Decraene, S. Litkowski Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: abashandy.ietf@gmail.com, cfilsfil@cisco.com, stefano@previdi.net, bruno.decraene@orange.com, slitkows.ietf@gmail.com Pages: 21 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-15.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8661 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8661 A Segment Routing (SR) node steers a packet through a controlled set of instructions, called segments, by prepending the packet with an SR header. A segment can represent any instruction, topological or service based. SR allows enforcing a flow through any topological path while maintaining per-flow state only at the ingress node to the SR domain. The Segment Routing architecture can be directly applied to the MPLS data plane with no change in the forwarding plane. This document describes how Segment Routing MPLS operates in a network where LDP is deployed and in the case where SR-capable and non-SR-capable nodes coexist. This document is a product of the Source Packet Routing in Networking Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Dec 6 13:54:04 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8A8120B55 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V8S73w-ugtDo for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4567120A28 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDF0F40742; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:31 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E1BCFF40742; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:29 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191206215329.E1BCFF40742@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:29 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8662_on_Entropy_Label_for_Source_Packet?= =?utf-8?q?_Routing_in_Networking_=28SPRING=29_Tunnels?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8662 Title: Entropy Label for Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) Tunnels Author: S. Kini, K. Kompella, S. Sivabalan, S. Litkowski, R. Shakir, J. Tantsura Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: sriganeshkini@gmail.com, kireeti@juniper.net, msiva@cisco.com, slitkows.ietf@gmail.com, robjs@google.com, jefftant.ietf@gmail.com Pages: 22 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8662 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8662 Segment Routing (SR) leverages the source-routing paradigm. A node steers a packet through an ordered list of instructions, called segments. Segment Routing can be applied to the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) data plane. Entropy labels (ELs) are used in MPLS to improve load-balancing. This document examines and describes how ELs are to be applied to Segment Routing MPLS. This document is a product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Dec 6 13:54:25 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A2D120B88 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sJlPVcDzuaSS for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B885120A30 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16563F4074C; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:39 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 697C4F4074B; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:38 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191206215338.697C4F4074B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:38 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8663_on_MPLS_Segment_Routing_over_IP?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8663 Title: MPLS Segment Routing over IP Author: X. Xu, S. Bryant, A. Farrel, S. Hassan, W. Henderickx, Z. Li Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com, stewart.bryant@gmail.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, shassan@cisco.com, wim.henderickx@nokia.com, lizhenbin@huawei.com Pages: 17 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-mpls-sr-over-ip-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8663 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8663 MPLS Segment Routing (SR-MPLS) is a method of source routing a packet through an MPLS data plane by imposing a stack of MPLS labels on the packet to specify the path together with any packet-specific instructions to be executed on it. SR-MPLS can be leveraged to realize a source-routing mechanism across MPLS, IPv4, and IPv6 data planes by using an MPLS label stack as a source-routing instruction set while making no changes to SR-MPLS specifications and interworking with SR-MPLS implementations. This document describes how SR-MPLS-capable routers and IP-only routers can seamlessly coexist and interoperate through the use of SR-MPLS label stacks and IP encapsulation/tunneling such as MPLS-over-UDP as defined in RFC 7510. This document is a product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Dec 6 13:54:41 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D829120AB2 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VKv_stnycvQh for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F21F120B4A for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5462AF40752; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:43 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 672B9F4074E; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:42 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191206215342.672B9F4074E@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8664_on_Path_Computation_Element_Commun?= =?utf-8?q?ication_Protocol_=28PCEP=29_Extensions_for_Segment_Routing?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8664 Title: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing Author: S. Sivabalan, C. Filsfils, J. Tantsura, W. Henderickx, J. Hardwick Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: msiva@cisco.com, cfilsfil@cisco.com, jefftant.ietf@gmail.com, wim.henderickx@nokia.com, jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com Pages: 29 Updates: RFC 8408 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-16.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8664 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8664 Segment Routing (SR) enables any head-end node to select any path without relying on a hop-by-hop signaling technique (e.g., LDP or RSVP-TE). It depends only on "segments" that are advertised by link-state Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs). An SR path can be derived from a variety of mechanisms, including an IGP Shortest Path Tree (SPT), an explicit configuration, or a Path Computation Element (PCE). This document specifies extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) that allow a stateful PCE to compute and initiate Traffic-Engineering (TE) paths, as well as a Path Computation Client (PCC) to request a path subject to certain constraints and optimization criteria in SR networks. This document updates RFC 8408. This document is a product of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Dec 6 13:54:55 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CE0120CBA for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VJ3aHhVj4TQ3 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA400120BF2 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9267AF4075A; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:51 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 75124F40737; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:50 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191206215350.75124F40737@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:53:50 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8665_on_OSPF_Extensions_for_Segment_Rou?= =?utf-8?q?ting?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lsr@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8665 Title: OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing Author: P. Psenak, Ed., S. Previdi, Ed., C. Filsfils, H. Gredler, R. Shakir, W. Henderickx, J. Tantsura Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: ppsenak@cisco.com, stefano@previdi.net, cfilsfil@cisco.com, hannes@rtbrick.com, robjs@google.com, wim.henderickx@nokia.com, jefftant.ietf@gmail.com Pages: 25 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-27.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8665 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8665 Segment Routing (SR) allows a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological subpaths called "segments". These segments are advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF). This document describes the OSPFv2 extensions required for Segment Routing. This document is a product of the Open Shortest Path First IGP Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Dec 6 13:55:14 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D696C12080F for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:55:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OMzWZygBF_Q4 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:55:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05894120A75 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0234F40766; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:02 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 690A4F4073B; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:01 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191206215401.690A4F4073B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 13:54:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8679_on_MPLS_Egress_Protection_Framewor?= =?utf-8?q?k?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8679 Title: MPLS Egress Protection Framework Author: Y. Shen, M. Jeganathan, B. Decraene, H. Gredler, C. Michel, H. Chen Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: yshen@juniper.net, minto@juniper.net, bruno.decraene@orange.com, hannes@rtbrick.com, c.michel@telekom.de, huaimo.chen@futurewei.com Pages: 25 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-mpls-egress-protection-framework-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8679 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8679 This document specifies a fast reroute framework for protecting IP/MPLS services and MPLS transport tunnels against egress node and egress link failures. For each type of egress failure, it defines the roles of Point of Local Repair (PLR), protector, and backup egress router and the procedures of establishing a bypass tunnel from a PLR to a protector. It describes the behaviors of these routers in handling an egress failure, including local repair on the PLR and context-based forwarding on the protector. The framework can be used to develop egress protection mechanisms to reduce traffic loss before global repair reacts to an egress failure and control-plane protocols converge on the topology changes due to the egress failure. This document is a product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Dec 6 14:25:40 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E867E1209EE for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:25:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w57Th7CgLb6Y for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:25:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E272C120A22 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:25:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED5FF4073B; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:25:31 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id AD2BBF4073A; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:25:30 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191206222530.AD2BBF4073A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:25:30 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8666_on_OSPFv3_Extensions_for_Segment_R?= =?utf-8?q?outing?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lsr@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8666 Title: OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing Author: P. Psenak, Ed., S. Previdi, Ed. Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: ppsenak@cisco.com, stefano@previdi.net Pages: 18 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-23.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8666 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8666 Segment Routing (SR) allows a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological subpaths called "segments". These segments are advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF). This document describes the OSPFv3 extensions required for Segment Routing with the MPLS data plane. This document is a product of the Link State Routing Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Dec 6 14:34:20 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E0F12002F for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X-B-UXez6MNa for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E065D12008D for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C260F40712; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:13 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 591A6F406F6; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:12 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191206223412.591A6F406F6@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8667_on_IS-IS_Extensions_for_Segment_Ro?= =?utf-8?q?uting?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lsr@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8667 Title: IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing Author: S. Previdi, Ed., L. Ginsberg, Ed., C. Filsfils, A. Bashandy, H. Gredler, B. Decraene Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: stefano@previdi.net, ginsberg@cisco.com, cfilsfil@cisco.com, abashandy.ietf@gmail.com, hannes@rtbrick.com, bruno.decraene@orange.com Pages: 28 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-25.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8667 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8667 Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological sub-paths, called "segments". These segments are advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF). This document describes the IS-IS extensions that need to be introduced for Segment Routing operating on an MPLS data plane. This document is a product of the Link State Routing Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Dec 6 14:34:38 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436371209A6 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G9CV6wkAMXBt for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A25241209D7 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE4EF4073E; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:29 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6BB7FF4073E; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:28 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191206223428.6BB7FF4073E@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8668_on_Advertising_Layer_2_Bundle_Memb?= =?utf-8?q?er_Link_Attributes_in_IS-IS?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lsr@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8668 Title: Advertising Layer 2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in IS-IS Author: L. Ginsberg, Ed., A. Bashandy, C. Filsfils, M. Nanduri, E. Aries Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: ginsberg@cisco.com, abashandy.ietf@gmail.com, cf@cisco.com, mohan.nanduri@oracle.com, exa@arrcus.com Pages: 17 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-isis-l2bundles-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8668 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8668 There are deployments where the Layer 3 interface on which IS-IS operates is a Layer 2 interface bundle. Existing IS-IS advertisements only support advertising link attributes of the Layer 3 interface. If entities external to IS-IS wish to control traffic flows on the individual physical links that comprise the Layer 2 interface bundle, link attribute information about the bundle members is required. This document introduces the ability for IS-IS to advertise the link attributes of Layer 2 (L2) Bundle Members. This document is a product of the IS-IS for IP Internets Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Dec 6 14:34:52 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E45120164 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QQzCrlIaM1Ko for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E614F1209B7 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26BBF40745; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:43 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 15240F40737; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:43 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191206223443.15240F40737@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8669_on_Segment_Routing_Prefix_Segment_?= =?utf-8?q?Identifier_Extensions_for_BGP?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, idr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8669 Title: Segment Routing Prefix Segment Identifier Extensions for BGP Author: S. Previdi, C. Filsfils, A. Lindem, Ed., A. Sreekantiah, H. Gredler Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: stefano@previdi.net, cfilsfils@cisco.com, acee@cisco.com, arjunhrs@gmail.com, hannes@rtbrick.com Pages: 15 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-27.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8669 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8669 Segment Routing (SR) leverages the source-routing paradigm. A node steers a packet through an ordered list of instructions called "segments". A segment can represent any instruction, topological or service based. The ingress node prepends an SR header to a packet containing a set of segment identifiers (SIDs). Each SID represents a topological or service-based instruction. Per-flow state is maintained only on the ingress node of the SR domain. An "SR domain" is defined as a single administrative domain for global SID assignment. This document defines an optional, transitive BGP attribute for announcing information about BGP Prefix Segment Identifiers (BGP Prefix-SIDs) and the specification for SR-MPLS SIDs. This document is a product of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Dec 6 14:35:09 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43963120A2E for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:35:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gZDi_AyjiSZG for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:35:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D73CC120114 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D62F40750; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:58 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 73152F4073B; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:57 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191206223457.73152F4073B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 14:34:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8670_on_BGP_Prefix_Segment_in_Large-Sca?= =?utf-8?q?le_Data_Centers?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, spring@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8670 Title: BGP Prefix Segment in Large-Scale Data Centers Author: C. Filsfils, Ed., S. Previdi, G. Dawra, E. Aries, P. Lapukhov Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: cfilsfil@cisco.com, stefano@previdi.net, gdawra.ietf@gmail.com, exa@arrcus.com, petr@fb.com Pages: 18 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8670 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8670 This document describes the motivation for, and benefits of, applying Segment Routing (SR) in BGP-based large-scale data centers. It describes the design to deploy SR in those data centers for both the MPLS and IPv6 data planes. This document is a product of the Source Packet Routing in Networking Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Dec 11 11:01:14 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D335E120052 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:01:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PvVVal6kWxb6 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:01:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC3D8120127 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:01:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCAFF40712; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:01:02 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 49CC4F40710; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:01:02 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191211190102.49CC4F40710@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:01:02 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8690_on_Clarification_of_Segment_ID_Sub?= =?utf-8?q?-TLV_Length_for_RFC_8287?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8690 Title: Clarification of Segment ID Sub-TLV Length for RFC 8287 Author: N. Nainar, C. Pignataro, F. Iqbal, A. Vainshtein Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: naikumar@cisco.com, cpignata@cisco.com, faisal.ietf@gmail.com, vainshtein.alex@gmail.com Pages: 7 Updates: RFC 8287 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-04.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8690 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8690 RFC 8287 defines the extensions to perform LSP Ping and Traceroute for Segment Routing IGP-Prefix and IGP-Adjacency Segment Identifiers (SIDs) with the MPLS data plane. RFC 8287 proposes three Target Forwarding Equivalence Class (FEC) Stack sub-TLVs. While RFC 8287 defines the format and procedure to handle those sub-TLVs, it does not sufficiently clarify how the length of the Segment ID sub-TLVs should be computed to be included in the Length field of the sub-TLVs. This ambiguity has resulted in interoperability issues. This document updates RFC 8287 by clarifying the length of each of the Segment ID sub-TLVs defined in RFC 8287. This document is a product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Dec 11 14:35:20 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44576120019 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:35:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQbT7PhQ5gfk for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:35:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 702491200B1 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:35:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C93F40719; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:35:08 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A300AF40719; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:35:06 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191211223506.A300AF40719@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:35:06 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8692_on_Internet_X=2E509_Public_Key_Inf?= =?utf-8?q?rastructure=3A_Additional_Algorithm_Identifiers_for_RSASSA-PSS_?= =?utf-8?q?and_ECDSA_Using_SHAKEs?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: spasm@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8692 Title: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Additional Algorithm Identifiers for RSASSA-PSS and ECDSA Using SHAKEs Author: P. Kampanakis, Q. Dang Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: pkampana@cisco.com, quynh.dang@nist.gov Pages: 14 Updates: RFC 3279 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lamps-pkix-shake-15.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8692 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8692 Digital signatures are used to sign messages, X.509 certificates, and Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs). This document updates the "Algorithms and Identifiers for the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List (CRL) Profile" (RFC 3279) and describes the conventions for using the SHAKE function family in Internet X.509 certificates and revocation lists as one-way hash functions with the RSA Probabilistic signature and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) signature algorithms. The conventions for the associated subject public keys are also described. This document is a product of the Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Dec 12 15:25:06 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5425E1208B5 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 15:25:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mg1MMn_eTgfs for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 15:25:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 992AC12012A for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 15:25:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F3CF40720; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 15:24:52 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 50E0DF4071E; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 15:24:50 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191212232450.50E0DF4071E@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 15:24:50 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8685_on_Path_Computation_Element_Commun?= =?utf-8?q?ication_Protocol_=28PCEP=29_Extensions_for=C2=A0the=C2=A0Hierar?= =?utf-8?q?chical_Path_Computation_Element_=28H-PCE=29_Architecture?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" QSBuZXcgUmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgQ29tbWVudHMgaXMgbm93IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBpbiBvbmxpbmUgUkZD IGxpYnJhcmllcy4KCiAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgUkZDIDg2ODUKCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGU6ICAg ICAgUGF0aCBDb21wdXRhdGlvbiBFbGVtZW50IENvbW11bmljYXRpb24gUHJvdG9jb2wgCiAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKFBDRVApIEV4dGVuc2lvbnMgZm9ywqB0aGXCoEhpZXJhcmNoaWNhbCBQ YXRoIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIENvbXB1dGF0aW9uIEVsZW1lbnQgKEgtUENFKSBBcmNo aXRlY3R1cmUgCiAgICAgICAgQXV0aG9yOiAgICAgRi4gWmhhbmcsIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgIFEuIFpoYW8sCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgTy4gR29uemFsZXogZGUgRGlvcywgCiAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgUi4gQ2FzZWxsYXMsCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgRC4gS2lu ZwogICAgICAgIFN0YXR1czogICAgIFN0YW5kYXJkcyBUcmFjawogICAgICAgIFN0cmVhbTogICAg IElFVEYKICAgICAgICBEYXRlOiAgICAgICBEZWNlbWJlciAyMDE5CiAgICAgICAgTWFpbGJveDog ICAgemhhbmdmYXRhaUBodWF3ZWkuY29tLCAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBxdWludGluemhh b0BnbWFpbC5jb20sIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIG9zY2FyLmdvbnphbGV6ZGVkaW9zQHRl bGVmb25pY2EuY29tLCAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgcmFtb24uY2FzZWxsYXNAY3R0Yy5l cywgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgZGFuaWVsQG9sZGRvZy5jby51awogICAgICAgIFBhZ2Vz OiAgICAgIDI3CiAgICAgICAgVXBkYXRlcy9PYnNvbGV0ZXMvU2VlQWxzbzogICBOb25lCgogICAg ICAgIEktRCBUYWc6ICAgIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtcGNlLWhpZXJhcmNoeS1leHRlbnNpb25zLTExLnR4 dAoKICAgICAgICBVUkw6ICAgICAgICBodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9pbmZvL3Jm Yzg2ODUKCiAgICAgICAgRE9JOiAgICAgICAgMTAuMTc0ODcvUkZDODY4NQoKVGhlIEhpZXJhcmNo aWNhbCBQYXRoIENvbXB1dGF0aW9uIEVsZW1lbnQgKEgtUENFKSBhcmNoaXRlY3R1cmUgaXMKZGVm aW5lZCBpbiBSRkMgNjgwNS4gIEl0IHByb3ZpZGVzIGEgbWVjaGFuaXNtIHRvIGRlcml2ZSBhbiBv cHRpbXVtCmVuZC10by1lbmQgcGF0aCBpbiBhIG11bHRpLWRvbWFpbiBlbnZpcm9ubWVudCBieSB1 c2luZyBhIGhpZXJhcmNoaWNhbApyZWxhdGlvbnNoaXAgYmV0d2VlbiBkb21haW5zIHRvIHNlbGVj dCB0aGUgb3B0aW11bSBzZXF1ZW5jZSBvZgpkb21haW5zIGFuZCBvcHRpbXVtIHBhdGhzIGFjcm9z cyB0aG9zZSBkb21haW5zLgoKVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBkZWZpbmVzIGV4dGVuc2lvbnMgdG8gdGhl IFBhdGggQ29tcHV0YXRpb24gRWxlbWVudApDb21tdW5pY2F0aW9uIFByb3RvY29sIChQQ0VQKSB0 byBzdXBwb3J0IEgtUENFIHByb2NlZHVyZXMuCgpUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGlzIGEgcHJvZHVjdCBv ZiB0aGUgUGF0aCBDb21wdXRhdGlvbiBFbGVtZW50IFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgb2YgdGhlIElFVEYu CgpUaGlzIGlzIG5vdyBhIFByb3Bvc2VkIFN0YW5kYXJkLgoKU1RBTkRBUkRTIFRSQUNLOiBUaGlz IGRvY3VtZW50IHNwZWNpZmllcyBhbiBJbnRlcm5ldCBTdGFuZGFyZHMgVHJhY2sKcHJvdG9jb2wg Zm9yIHRoZSBJbnRlcm5ldCBjb21tdW5pdHksIGFuZCByZXF1ZXN0cyBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIGFuZCBz dWdnZXN0aW9ucwpmb3IgaW1wcm92ZW1lbnRzLiAgUGxlYXNlIHJlZmVyIHRvIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50 IGVkaXRpb24gb2YgdGhlIE9mZmljaWFsCkludGVybmV0IFByb3RvY29sIFN0YW5kYXJkcyAoaHR0 cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvc3RhbmRhcmRzKSBmb3IgdGhlIApzdGFuZGFyZGl6YXRp b24gc3RhdGUgYW5kIHN0YXR1cyBvZiB0aGlzIHByb3RvY29sLiAgRGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIG9mIHRo aXMgCm1lbW8gaXMgdW5saW1pdGVkLgoKVGhpcyBhbm5vdW5jZW1lbnQgaXMgc2VudCB0byB0aGUg SUVURi1Bbm5vdW5jZSBhbmQgcmZjLWRpc3QgbGlzdHMuClRvIHN1YnNjcmliZSBvciB1bnN1YnNj cmliZSwgc2VlCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pZXRmLWFu bm91bmNlCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly9tYWlsbWFuLnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8v cmZjLWRpc3QKCkZvciBzZWFyY2hpbmcgdGhlIFJGQyBzZXJpZXMsIHNlZSBodHRwczovL3d3dy5y ZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9zZWFyY2gKRm9yIGRvd25sb2FkaW5nIFJGQ3MsIHNlZSBodHRwczovL3d3 dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9yZXRyaWV2ZS9idWxrCgpSZXF1ZXN0cyBmb3Igc3BlY2lhbCBkaXN0 cmlidXRpb24gc2hvdWxkIGJlIGFkZHJlc3NlZCB0byBlaXRoZXIgdGhlCmF1dGhvciBvZiB0aGUg UkZDIGluIHF1ZXN0aW9uLCBvciB0byByZmMtZWRpdG9yQHJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnLiAgVW5sZXNz CnNwZWNpZmljYWxseSBub3RlZCBvdGhlcndpc2Ugb24gdGhlIFJGQyBpdHNlbGYsIGFsbCBSRkNz IGFyZSBmb3IKdW5saW1pdGVkIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbi4KCgpUaGUgUkZDIEVkaXRvciBUZWFtCkFz c29jaWF0aW9uIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgU29sdXRpb25zLCBMTEMKCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwpyZmMtZGlzdCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKcmZjLWRp c3RAcmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0 aW5mby9yZmMtZGlzdApodHRwOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnCg== From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Dec 18 20:38:49 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942F4120018 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:38:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SGleTp2mwmgm for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:38:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 893F812004F for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:38:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2585F40722; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:38:28 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id EB9C9F40721; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:38:27 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191219043827.EB9C9F40721@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:38:27 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8694_on_Applicability_of_the_Path_Compu?= =?utf-8?q?tation_Element_to_Inter-area_and_Inter-AS_MPLS_and_GMPLS_Traffi?= =?utf-8?q?c_Engineering?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8694 Title: Applicability of the Path Computation Element to Inter-area and Inter-AS MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering Author: D. King, H. Zheng Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: daniel@olddog.co.uk, zhenghaomian@huawei.com Pages: 24 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-08.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8694 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8694 The Path Computation Element (PCE) may be used for computing services that traverse multi-area and multi-Autonomous System (multi-AS) Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Traffic-Engineered (TE) networks. This document examines the applicability of the PCE architecture, protocols, and protocol extensions for computing multi-area and multi-AS paths in MPLS and GMPLS networks. This document is a product of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Dec 18 21:32:51 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A31120018 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:32:51 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oXWkHNnKnoBP for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:32:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A29D12004F for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:32:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00FDF40722; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:32:30 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4A057F40721; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:32:30 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191219053230.4A057F40721@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:32:30 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8696_on_Using_Pre-Shared_Key_=28PSK=29_?= =?utf-8?q?in_the_Cryptographic_Message_Syntax_=28CMS=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: spasm@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8696 Title: Using Pre-Shared Key (PSK) in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Author: R. Housley Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: housley@vigilsec.com Pages: 31 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-mix-with-psk-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8696 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8696 The invention of a large-scale quantum computer would pose a serious challenge for the cryptographic algorithms that are widely deployed today. The Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) supports key transport and key agreement algorithms that could be broken by the invention of such a quantum computer. By storing communications that are protected with the CMS today, someone could decrypt them in the future when a large-scale quantum computer becomes available. Once quantum-secure key management algorithms are available, the CMS will be extended to support the new algorithms if the existing syntax does not accommodate them. This document describes a mechanism to protect today's communication from the future invention of a large-scale quantum computer by mixing the output of key transport and key agreement algorithms with a pre-shared key. This document is a product of the Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Dec 18 22:07:16 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3DC120018 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:07:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id afSweL4ALgLG for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:07:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298CD12008B for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:07:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658F9F40724; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:06:55 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B2C0AF40723; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:06:54 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191219060654.B2C0AF40723@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:06:54 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8678_on_Enterprise_Multihoming_using_Pr?= =?utf-8?q?ovider-Assigned_IPv6_Addresses_without_Network_Prefix_Translati?= =?utf-8?q?on=3A_Requirements_and_Solutions?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rtgwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8678 Title: Enterprise Multihoming using Provider-Assigned IPv6 Addresses without Network Prefix Translation: Requirements and Solutions Author: F. Baker, C. Bowers, J. Linkova Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: December 2019 Mailbox: FredBaker.IETF@gmail.com, cbowers@juniper.net, furry@google.com Pages: 43 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming-12.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8678 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8678 Connecting an enterprise site to multiple ISPs over IPv6 using provider-assigned addresses is difficult without the use of some form of Network Address Translation (NAT). Much has been written on this topic over the last 10 to 15 years, but it still remains a problem without a clearly defined or widely implemented solution. Any multihoming solution without NAT requires hosts at the site to have addresses from each ISP and to select the egress ISP by selecting a source address for outgoing packets. It also requires routers at the site to take into account those source addresses when forwarding packets out towards the ISPs. This document examines currently available mechanisms for providing a solution to this problem for a broad range of enterprise topologies. It covers the behavior of routers to forward traffic by taking into account source address, and it covers the behavior of hosts to select appropriate default source addresses. It also covers any possible role that routers might play in providing information to hosts to help them select appropriate source addresses. In the process of exploring potential solutions, this document also makes explicit requirements for how the solution would be expected to behave from the perspective of an enterprise site network administrator. This document is a product of the Routing Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon Dec 23 12:54:29 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD7B120CE8 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 12:54:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YTg-Zcwq9Wum for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 12:54:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84B9B1201DB for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 12:54:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DD2F40752; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 12:54:23 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 434EFF40751; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 12:54:22 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191223205422.434EFF40751@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 12:54:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8700_on_Fifty_Years_of_RFCs?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8700 Title: Fifty Years of RFCs Author: H. Flanagan, Ed. Status: Informational Stream: IAB Date: December 2019 Mailbox: rse@rfc-editor.org Pages: 22 Updates: RFC 2555, RFC 5540 I-D Tag: draft-iab-fiftyyears-01.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8700 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8700 This RFC marks the fiftieth anniversary for the RFC Series. It includes both retrospective material from individuals involved at key inflection points as well as a review of the current state of affairs. It concludes with thoughts on possibilities for the next fifty years for the Series. This document updates the perspectives offered in RFCs 2555 and 5540. This document is a product of the Internet Architecture Board. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Dec 27 10:23:56 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90420120018 for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:23:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tFZpm-L6l3mR for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:23:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4138712013B for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:23:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AFDF40743; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:23:45 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7B001F40742; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:23:44 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20191227182344.7B001F40742@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:23:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8691_on_Basic_Support_for_IPv6_Networks?= =?utf-8?q?_Operating_Outside_the_Context_of_a_Basic_Service_Set_over_IEEE?= =?utf-8?q?_Std_802=2E11?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, its@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" QSBuZXcgUmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgQ29tbWVudHMgaXMgbm93IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBpbiBvbmxpbmUgUkZD IGxpYnJhcmllcy4KCiAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgUkZDIDg2OTEKCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGU6ICAg ICAgQmFzaWMgU3VwcG9ydCBmb3IgSVB2NiBOZXR3b3JrcyAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBP cGVyYXRpbmcgT3V0c2lkZSB0aGUgQ29udGV4dCBvZiBhIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEJh c2ljIFNlcnZpY2UgU2V0IG92ZXIgSUVFRSBTdGQgODAyLjExCiAgICAgICAgQXV0aG9yOiAgICAg Ti4gQmVuYW1hciwKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBKLiBIw6RycmksCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgSi4gTGVlLAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFQuIEVybnN0CiAgICAgICAgU3RhdHVz OiAgICAgU3RhbmRhcmRzIFRyYWNrCiAgICAgICAgU3RyZWFtOiAgICAgSUVURgogICAgICAgIERh dGU6ICAgICAgIERlY2VtYmVyIDIwMTkKICAgICAgICBNYWlsYm94OiAgICBuLmJlbmFtYXJAZXN0 LnVtaS5hYy5tYSwgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgamVyb21lLmhhZXJyaUBldXJlY29tLmZy LCAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBqb25naHlvdWtAc211LmFjLmtyLAogICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgIHRoaWVycnkuZXJuc3RAeW9nb2tvLmZyCiAgICAgICAgUGFnZXM6ICAgICAgMjkKICAg ICAgICBVcGRhdGVzL09ic29sZXRlcy9TZWVBbHNvOiAgIE5vbmUKCiAgICAgICAgSS1EIFRhZzog ICAgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1pcHdhdmUtaXB2Ni1vdmVyLTgwMjExb2NiLTUyLnR4dAoKICAgICAgICBV Ukw6ICAgICAgICBodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9pbmZvL3JmYzg2OTEKCiAgICAg ICAgRE9JOiAgICAgICAgMTAuMTc0ODcvUkZDODY5MQoKVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBwcm92aWRlcyBt ZXRob2RzIGFuZCBzZXR0aW5ncyBmb3IgdXNpbmcgSVB2NiB0bwpjb21tdW5pY2F0ZSBhbW9uZyBu b2RlcyB3aXRoaW4gcmFuZ2Ugb2Ygb25lIGFub3RoZXIgb3ZlciBhIHNpbmdsZQpJRUVFIDgwMi4x MS1PQ0IgbGluay4gU3VwcG9ydCBmb3IgdGhlc2UgbWV0aG9kcyBhbmQgc2V0dGluZ3MgcmVxdWly ZQptaW5pbWFsIGNoYW5nZXMgdG8gZXhpc3Rpbmcgc3RhY2tzLiBUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGFsc28g ZGVzY3JpYmVzCmxpbWl0YXRpb25zIGFzc29jaWF0ZWQgd2l0aCB1c2luZyB0aGVzZSBtZXRob2Rz LiBPcHRpbWl6YXRpb25zIGFuZAp1c2FnZSBvZiBJUHY2IG92ZXIgbW9yZSBjb21wbGV4IHNjZW5h cmlvcyBhcmUgbm90IGNvdmVyZWQgaW4gdGhpcwpzcGVjaWZpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBhcmUgYSBzdWJq ZWN0IGZvciBmdXR1cmUgd29yay4KClRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgaXMgYSBwcm9kdWN0IG9mIHRoZSBJ UCBXaXJlbGVzcyBBY2Nlc3MgaW4gVmVoaWN1bGFyIEVudmlyb25tZW50cyBXb3JraW5nIEdyb3Vw IG9mIHRoZSBJRVRGLgoKVGhpcyBpcyBub3cgYSBQcm9wb3NlZCBTdGFuZGFyZC4KClNUQU5EQVJE UyBUUkFDSzogVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBzcGVjaWZpZXMgYW4gSW50ZXJuZXQgU3RhbmRhcmRzIFRy YWNrCnByb3RvY29sIGZvciB0aGUgSW50ZXJuZXQgY29tbXVuaXR5LCBhbmQgcmVxdWVzdHMgZGlz Y3Vzc2lvbiBhbmQgc3VnZ2VzdGlvbnMKZm9yIGltcHJvdmVtZW50cy4gIFBsZWFzZSByZWZlciB0 byB0aGUgY3VycmVudCBlZGl0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBPZmZpY2lhbApJbnRlcm5ldCBQcm90b2NvbCBT dGFuZGFyZHMgKGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL3N0YW5kYXJkcykgZm9yIHRoZSAK c3RhbmRhcmRpemF0aW9uIHN0YXRlIGFuZCBzdGF0dXMgb2YgdGhpcyBwcm90b2NvbC4gIERpc3Ry aWJ1dGlvbiBvZiB0aGlzIAptZW1vIGlzIHVubGltaXRlZC4KClRoaXMgYW5ub3VuY2VtZW50IGlz IHNlbnQgdG8gdGhlIElFVEYtQW5ub3VuY2UgYW5kIHJmYy1kaXN0IGxpc3RzLgpUbyBzdWJzY3Jp YmUgb3IgdW5zdWJzY3JpYmUsIHNlZQogIGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlz dGluZm8vaWV0Zi1hbm5vdW5jZQogIGh0dHBzOi8vbWFpbG1hbi5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9tYWls bWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3JmYy1kaXN0CgpGb3Igc2VhcmNoaW5nIHRoZSBSRkMgc2VyaWVzLCBzZWUg aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvc2VhcmNoCkZvciBkb3dubG9hZGluZyBSRkNzLCBz ZWUgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvcmV0cmlldmUvYnVsawoKUmVxdWVzdHMgZm9y IHNwZWNpYWwgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIHNob3VsZCBiZSBhZGRyZXNzZWQgdG8gZWl0aGVyIHRoZQph dXRob3Igb2YgdGhlIFJGQyBpbiBxdWVzdGlvbiwgb3IgdG8gcmZjLWVkaXRvckByZmMtZWRpdG9y Lm9yZy4gIFVubGVzcwpzcGVjaWZpY2FsbHkgbm90ZWQgb3RoZXJ3aXNlIG9uIHRoZSBSRkMgaXRz ZWxmLCBhbGwgUkZDcyBhcmUgZm9yCnVubGltaXRlZCBkaXN0cmlidXRpb24uCgoKVGhlIFJGQyBF ZGl0b3IgVGVhbQpBc3NvY2lhdGlvbiBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IFNvbHV0aW9ucywgTExDCgoKX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KcmZjLWRpc3QgbWFpbGlu ZyBsaXN0CnJmYy1kaXN0QHJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3Jn L21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcmZjLWRpc3QKaHR0cDovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZwo=