From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Feb 6 13:02:26 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8415312082F for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 13:02:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zTvPpeonn5GT for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 13:02:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A9BE1200E5 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 13:02:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB609F406CC; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 13:02:07 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5D06AF406CC; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 13:02:06 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200206210206.5D06AF406CC@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 13:02:06 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8698_on_Network-Assisted_Dynamic_Adapta?= =?utf-8?q?tion_=28NADA=29=3A_A_Unified_Congestion_Control_Scheme_for_Real?= =?utf-8?q?-Time_Media?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rmcat@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8698 Title: Network-Assisted Dynamic Adaptation (NADA): A Unified Congestion Control Scheme for Real-Time Media Author: X. Zhu, R. Pan, M. Ramalho, S. Mena Status: Experimental Stream: IETF Date: February 2020 Mailbox: xiaoqzhu@cisco.com, rong.pan@intel.com, mar42@cornell.edu, semena@cisco.com Pages: 26 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-rmcat-nada-13.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8698 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8698 This document describes Network-Assisted Dynamic Adaptation (NADA), a novel congestion control scheme for interactive real-time media applications such as video conferencing. In the proposed scheme, the sender regulates its sending rate, based on either implicit or explicit congestion signaling, in a unified approach. The scheme can benefit from Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) markings from network nodes. It also maintains consistent sender behavior in the absence of such markings by reacting to queuing delays and packet losses instead. This document is a product of the RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques Working Group of the IETF. EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Feb 6 14:07:10 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED74120863 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 14:07:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7tLHJHLMKpO5 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 14:07:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12FA212011B for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 14:07:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AE0F406F5; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 14:06:51 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 74774F406F0; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 14:06:49 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200206220649.74774F406F0@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 14:06:49 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8686_on_Application-Layer_Traffic_Optim?= =?utf-8?q?ization_=28ALTO=29_Cross=E2=80=91Domain_Server_Discovery?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, alto@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" QSBuZXcgUmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgQ29tbWVudHMgaXMgbm93IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBpbiBvbmxpbmUgUkZD IGxpYnJhcmllcy4KCiAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgUkZDIDg2ODYKCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGU6ICAg ICAgQXBwbGljYXRpb24tTGF5ZXIgVHJhZmZpYyBPcHRpbWl6YXRpb24gKEFMVE8pIAogICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgIENyb3Nz4oCRRG9tYWluIFNlcnZlciBEaXNjb3ZlcnkgCiAgICAgICAgQXV0 aG9yOiAgICAgUy4gS2llc2VsLAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIE0uIFN0aWVtZXJsaW5nCiAg ICAgICAgU3RhdHVzOiAgICAgU3RhbmRhcmRzIFRyYWNrCiAgICAgICAgU3RyZWFtOiAgICAgSUVU RgogICAgICAgIERhdGU6ICAgICAgIEZlYnJ1YXJ5IDIwMjAKICAgICAgICBNYWlsYm94OiAgICBp ZXRmLWFsdG9Ac2tpZXNlbC5kZSwgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgbWxzLmlldGZAZ21haWwu Y29tCiAgICAgICAgUGFnZXM6ICAgICAgMzQKICAgICAgICBVcGRhdGVzL09ic29sZXRlcy9TZWVB bHNvOiAgIE5vbmUKCiAgICAgICAgSS1EIFRhZzogICAgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1hbHRvLXhkb20tZGlz Yy0wNi50eHQKCiAgICAgICAgVVJMOiAgICAgICAgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcv aW5mby9yZmM4Njg2CgogICAgICAgIERPSTogICAgICAgIDEwLjE3NDg3L1JGQzg2ODYKClRoZSBn b2FsIG9mIEFwcGxpY2F0aW9uLUxheWVyIFRyYWZmaWMgT3B0aW1pemF0aW9uIChBTFRPKSBpcyB0 bwpwcm92aWRlIGd1aWRhbmNlIHRvIGFwcGxpY2F0aW9ucyB0aGF0IGhhdmUgdG8gc2VsZWN0IG9u ZSBvciBzZXZlcmFsCmhvc3RzIGZyb20gYSBzZXQgb2YgY2FuZGlkYXRlcyBjYXBhYmxlIG9mIHBy b3ZpZGluZyBhIGRlc2lyZWQKcmVzb3VyY2UuICBBTFRPIGlzIHJlYWxpemVkIGJ5IGEgY2xpZW50 LXNlcnZlciBwcm90b2NvbC4gIEJlZm9yZSBhbgpBTFRPIGNsaWVudCBjYW4gYXNrIGZvciBndWlk YW5jZSwgaXQgbmVlZHMgdG8gZGlzY292ZXIgb25lIG9yIG1vcmUKQUxUTyBzZXJ2ZXJzIHRoYXQg Y2FuIHByb3ZpZGUgc3VpdGFibGUgZ3VpZGFuY2UuCgpJbiBzb21lIGRlcGxveW1lbnQgc2NlbmFy aW9zLCBpbiBwYXJ0aWN1bGFyIGlmIHRoZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBhYm91dAp0aGUgbmV0d29yayB0 b3BvbG9neSBpcyBwYXJ0aXRpb25lZCBhbmQgZGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgb3ZlciBzZXZlcmFsIEFMVE8K c2VydmVycywgaXQgbWF5IGJlIG5lY2Vzc2FyeSB0byBkaXNjb3ZlciBhbiBBTFRPIHNlcnZlciBv dXRzaWRlIG9mCnRoZSBBTFRPIGNsaWVudCdzIG93biBuZXR3b3JrIGRvbWFpbiwgaW4gb3JkZXIg dG8gZ2V0IGFwcHJvcHJpYXRlCmd1aWRhbmNlLiAgVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBkZXRhaWxzIGFwcGxp Y2FibGUgc2NlbmFyaW9zLCBpdGVtaXplcwpyZXF1aXJlbWVudHMsIGFuZCBzcGVjaWZpZXMgYSBw cm9jZWR1cmUgZm9yIEFMVE8gY3Jvc3MtZG9tYWluIHNlcnZlcgpkaXNjb3ZlcnkuCgpUZWNobmlj YWxseSwgdGhlIHByb2NlZHVyZSBzcGVjaWZpZWQgaW4gdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCB0YWtlcyBvbmUK SVDCoGFkZHJlc3Mgb3IgcHJlZml4IGFuZCBhIFUtTkFQVFIgU2VydmljZSBQYXJhbWV0ZXIgKHR5 cGljYWxseSwKIkFMVE86aHR0cHMiKSBhcyBwYXJhbWV0ZXJzLiBJdCBwZXJmb3JtcyBETlMgbG9v a3VwcyAoZm9yIE5BUFRSCnJlc291cmNlIHJlY29yZHMgaW4gdGhlICJpbi1hZGRyLmFycGEuIiBv ciAiaXA2LmFycGEuIiB0cmVlcykgYW5kCnJldHVybnMgb25lIG9yIG1vcmUgVVJJcyBvZiBpbmZv cm1hdGlvbiByZXNvdXJjZXMgcmVsYXRlZCB0byB0aGF0IElQCmFkZHJlc3Mgb3IgcHJlZml4LgoK VGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBpcyBhIHByb2R1Y3Qgb2YgdGhlIEFwcGxpY2F0aW9uLUxheWVyIFRyYWZm aWMgT3B0aW1pemF0aW9uIFdvcmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgb2YgdGhlIElFVEYuCgpUaGlzIGlzIG5vdyBh IFByb3Bvc2VkIFN0YW5kYXJkLgoKU1RBTkRBUkRTIFRSQUNLOiBUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IHNwZWNp ZmllcyBhbiBJbnRlcm5ldCBTdGFuZGFyZHMgVHJhY2sKcHJvdG9jb2wgZm9yIHRoZSBJbnRlcm5l dCBjb21tdW5pdHksIGFuZCByZXF1ZXN0cyBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIGFuZCBzdWdnZXN0aW9ucwpmb3Ig aW1wcm92ZW1lbnRzLiAgUGxlYXNlIHJlZmVyIHRvIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IGVkaXRpb24gb2YgdGhl IE9mZmljaWFsCkludGVybmV0IFByb3RvY29sIFN0YW5kYXJkcyAoaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVk aXRvci5vcmcvc3RhbmRhcmRzKSBmb3IgdGhlIApzdGFuZGFyZGl6YXRpb24gc3RhdGUgYW5kIHN0 YXR1cyBvZiB0aGlzIHByb3RvY29sLiAgRGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIG9mIHRoaXMgCm1lbW8gaXMgdW5s aW1pdGVkLgoKVGhpcyBhbm5vdW5jZW1lbnQgaXMgc2VudCB0byB0aGUgSUVURi1Bbm5vdW5jZSBh bmQgcmZjLWRpc3QgbGlzdHMuClRvIHN1YnNjcmliZSBvciB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSwgc2VlCiAgaHR0 cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pZXRmLWFubm91bmNlCiAgaHR0cHM6 Ly9tYWlsbWFuLnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcmZjLWRpc3QKCkZvciBz ZWFyY2hpbmcgdGhlIFJGQyBzZXJpZXMsIHNlZSBodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9z ZWFyY2gKRm9yIGRvd25sb2FkaW5nIFJGQ3MsIHNlZSBodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9y Zy9yZXRyaWV2ZS9idWxrCgpSZXF1ZXN0cyBmb3Igc3BlY2lhbCBkaXN0cmlidXRpb24gc2hvdWxk IGJlIGFkZHJlc3NlZCB0byBlaXRoZXIgdGhlCmF1dGhvciBvZiB0aGUgUkZDIGluIHF1ZXN0aW9u LCBvciB0byByZmMtZWRpdG9yQHJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnLiAgVW5sZXNzCnNwZWNpZmljYWxseSBu b3RlZCBvdGhlcndpc2Ugb24gdGhlIFJGQyBpdHNlbGYsIGFsbCBSRkNzIGFyZSBmb3IKdW5saW1p dGVkIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbi4KCgpUaGUgUkZDIEVkaXRvciBUZWFtCkFzc29jaWF0aW9uIE1hbmFn ZW1lbnQgU29sdXRpb25zLCBMTEMKCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fXwpyZmMtZGlzdCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKcmZjLWRpc3RAcmZjLWVkaXRvci5v cmcKaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9yZmMtZGlzdApo dHRwOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnCg== From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Feb 7 10:02:22 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97264120947 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:02:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hsxnf9Se8GnE for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:02:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7060B12093C for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:02:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77714F406F0; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:02:03 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 779AFF406DA; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:02:02 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200207180202.779AFF406DA@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:02:02 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?BCP_84=2C_RFC_8704_on_Enhanced_Feasible-Pat?= =?utf-8?q?h_Unicast_Reverse_Path_Forwarding?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, opsec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 84 RFC 8704 Title: Enhanced Feasible-Path Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding Author: K. Sriram, D. Montgomery, J. Haas Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: February 2020 Mailbox: ksriram@nist.gov, dougm@nist.gov, jhaas@juniper.net Pages: 17 Updates: RFC 3704 See Also: BCP 84 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-04.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8704 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8704 This document identifies a need for and proposes improvement of the unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF) techniques (see RFC 3704) for detection and mitigation of source address spoofing (see BCP 38). Strict uRPF is inflexible about directionality, the loose uRPF is oblivious to directionality, and the current feasible-path uRPF attempts to strike a balance between the two (see RFC 3704). However, as shown in this document, the existing feasible-path uRPF still has shortcomings. This document describes enhanced feasible-path uRPF (EFP-uRPF) techniques that are more flexible (in a meaningful way) about directionality than the feasible-path uRPF (RFC 3704). The proposed EFP-uRPF methods aim to significantly reduce false positives regarding invalid detection in source address validation (SAV). Hence, they can potentially alleviate ISPs' concerns about the possibility of disrupting service for their customers and encourage greater deployment of uRPF techniques. This document updates RFC 3704. This document is a product of the Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure Working Group of the IETF. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Feb 11 21:37:05 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401D212083B for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 21:37:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qpvfz-hv285E for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 21:37:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B0AB120863 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 21:37:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD80F40709; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 21:36:39 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A35E9F406F7; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 21:36:37 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200212053637.A35E9F406F7@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 21:36:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8703_on_Dynamic_Link_Exchange_Protocol_?= =?utf-8?q?=28DLEP=29_Link_Identifier_Extension?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, manet@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8703 Title: Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) Link Identifier Extension Author: R. Taylor, S. Ratliff Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: February 2020 Mailbox: rick.taylor@airbus.com Pages: 9 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-manet-dlep-lid-extension-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8703 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8703 The Dynamic Link Exchange Protocol (DLEP) is a protocol for modems to advertise the status of wireless links between reachable destinations to attached routers. The core specification of the protocol (RFC 8175) assumes that every modem in the radio network has an attached DLEP router and requires that the Media Access Control (MAC) address of the DLEP interface on the attached router be used to identify the destination in the network, for purposes of reporting the state and quality of the link to that destination. This document describes a DLEP extension that allows modems that do not meet the strict requirement above to use DLEP to describe link availability and quality to one or more destinations reachable beyond a device on the Layer 2 domain. This document is a product of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Feb 12 11:03:27 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B12120AA3 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uv42LXM6GHYY for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33DBD120AA7 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80225F40714; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:00 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 177D3F40714; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:02:59 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200212190259.177D3F40714@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:02:59 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?Moved_to_Historic=3A_RFC_4405_on_SMTP_Servi?= =?utf-8?q?ce_Extension_for_Indicating_the_Responsible_Submitter_of_an_E-M?= =?utf-8?q?ail_Message?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" RFC 4405 has been reclassified as Historic. RFC 4405 Title: SMTP Service Extension for Indicating the Responsible Submitter of an E-Mail Message Author: E. Allman, H. Katz Status: Historic Stream: IETF Date: April 2006 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-katz-submitter-01.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4405 DOI: 10.17487/RFC4405 This memo defines an extension to the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) service that allows an SMTP client to specify the responsible submitter of an e-mail message. The responsible submitter is the e-mail address of the entity most recently responsible for introducing a message into the transport stream. This extension helps receiving e-mail servers efficiently determine whether the SMTP client is authorized to transmit mail on behalf of the responsible submitter's domain. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. HISTORIC: This memo defines a Historic Document for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Feb 12 11:03:45 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A9A120AD6 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9QmDVuD0IdhB for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33221120B04 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFAEF40725; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:06 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6199BF40724; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:05 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200212190305.6199BF40724@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:05 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?Moved_to_Historic=3A_RFC_4406_on_Sender_ID?= =?utf-8?q?=3A_Authenticating_E-Mail?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" RFC 4406 has been reclassified as Historic. RFC 4406 Title: Sender ID: Authenticating E-Mail Author: J. Lyon, M. Wong Status: Historic Stream: IETF Date: April 2006 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-lyon-senderid-core-01.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4406 DOI: 10.17487/RFC4406 Internet mail suffers from the fact that much unwanted mail is sent using spoofed addresses -- "spoofed" in this case means that the address is used without the permission of the domain owner. This document describes a family of tests by which SMTP servers can determine whether an e-mail address in a received message was used with the permission of the owner of the domain contained in that e-mail address. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. HISTORIC: This memo defines a Historic Document for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Feb 12 11:04:11 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28320120BCA for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:04:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h6zarZMR6DUy for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:04:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2103A120B4E for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:04:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FCAF4073A; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:14 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 76355F40739; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:13 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200212190313.76355F40739@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:03:13 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?Moved_to_Historic=3A_RFC_4407_on_Purported_?= =?utf-8?q?Responsible_Address_in_E-Mail_Messages?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" RFC 4407 has been reclassified as Historic. RFC 4407 Title: Purported Responsible Address in E-Mail Messages Author: J. Lyon Status: Historic Stream: IETF Date: April 2006 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-lyon-senderid-pra-01.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4407 DOI: 10.17487/RFC4407 This document defines an algorithm by which, given an e-mail message, one can extract the identity of the party that appears to have most proximately caused that message to be delivered. This identity is called the Purported Responsible Address (PRA).This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. HISTORIC: This memo defines a Historic Document for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Feb 12 15:12:31 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BBC120013 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:12:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id raDLrP1bMXAx for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:12:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB4ED12001E for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:12:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037D9F40723; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:12:06 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 90CEAF40721; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:12:04 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200212231204.90CEAF40721@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:12:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8708_on_Use_of_the_HSS/LMS_Hash-Based_S?= =?utf-8?q?ignature_Algorithm_in_the_Cryptographic_Message_Syntax_=28CMS?= =?utf-8?q?=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: spasm@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8708 Title: Use of the HSS/LMS Hash-Based Signature Algorithm in the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Author: R. Housley Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: February 2020 Mailbox: housley@vigilsec.com Pages: 14 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-hash-sig-10.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8708 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8708 This document specifies the conventions for using the Hierarchical Signature System (HSS) / Leighton-Micali Signature (LMS) hash-based signature algorithm with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS). In addition, the algorithm identifier and public key syntax are provided. The HSS/LMS algorithm is one form of hash-based digital signature; it is described in RFC 8554. This document is a product of the Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Feb 19 14:57:13 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FA01200C7 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:57:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RSz-6xZmBMNA for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:57:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7166120821 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:57:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29217F40714; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:57:07 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E7187F40713; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:57:05 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200219225705.E7187F40713@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:57:05 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?BCP_225=2C_RFC_8725_on_JSON_Web_Token_Best_?= =?utf-8?q?Current_Practices?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, oauth@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 225 RFC 8725 Title: JSON Web Token Best Current Practices Author: Y. Sheffer, D. Hardt, M. Jones Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: February 2020 Mailbox: yaronf.ietf@gmail.com, dick.hardt@gmail.com, mbj@microsoft.com Pages: 13 Updates: RFC 7519 See Also: BCP 225 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8725 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8725 JSON Web Tokens, also known as JWTs, are URL-safe JSON-based security tokens that contain a set of claims that can be signed and/or encrypted. JWTs are being widely used and deployed as a simple security token format in numerous protocols and applications, both in the area of digital identity and in other application areas. This Best Current Practices document updates RFC 7519 to provide actionable guidance leading to secure implementation and deployment of JWTs. This document is a product of the Web Authorization Protocol Working Group of the IETF. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Feb 19 14:57:30 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8083F120960 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:57:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pX0TpTDdEZqF for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:57:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15A0412087C for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:57:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6974BF4072C; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:57:14 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 33AA0F40738; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:57:13 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200219225713.33AA0F40738@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 14:57:13 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8742_on_Concise_Binary_Object_Represent?= =?utf-8?q?ation_=28CBOR=29_Sequences?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, cbor@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8742 Title: Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Sequences Author: C. Bormann Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: February 2020 Mailbox: cabo@tzi.org Pages: 10 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-cbor-sequence-02.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8742 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8742 This document describes the Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) Sequence format and associated media type "application/cbor-seq". A CBOR Sequence consists of any number of encoded CBOR data items, simply concatenated in sequence. Structured syntax suffixes for media types allow other media types to build on them and make it explicit that they are built on an existing media type as their foundation. This specification defines and registers "+cbor-seq" as a structured syntax suffix for CBOR Sequences. This document is a product of the Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Feb 21 14:33:45 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE041200E5 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:33:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PnTSMHTcqwLT for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:33:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE68C1200C3 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:33:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74622F4071A; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:33:37 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 507A5F40719; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:33:36 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200221223336.507A5F40719@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:33:36 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8695_on_A_YANG_Data_Model_for_the_Routi?= =?utf-8?q?ng_Information_Protocol_=28RIP=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rtgwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8695 Title: A YANG Data Model for the Routing Information Protocol (RIP) Author: X. Liu, P. Sarda, V. Choudhary Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: February 2020 Mailbox: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com, prateek.sarda@ericsson.com, vikschw@gmail.com Pages: 40 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8695 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8695 This document describes a data model for the management of the Routing Information Protocol (RIP). Both RIP version 2 and RIPng are covered. The data model includes definitions for configuration, operational state, and Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs). The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA). This document is a product of the Routing Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Feb 21 14:36:13 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E9612008F for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:36:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eM_Uo1kxLtlQ for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:36:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F6221200DB for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:36:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44DCF4071A; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:36:04 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id BEA98F40719; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:36:03 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200221223603.BEA98F40719@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:36:03 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8734_on_Elliptic_Curve_Cryptography_=28?= =?utf-8?q?ECC=29_Brainpool_Curves_for_Transport_Layer_Security_=28TLS=29_?= =?utf-8?q?Version_1=2E3?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8734 Title: Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Brainpool Curves for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Version 1.3 Author: L. Bruckert, J. Merkle, M. Lochter Status: Informational Stream: Independent Date: February 2020 Mailbox: leonie.bruckert@secunet.com, johannes.merkle@secunet.com, manfred.lochter@bsi.bund.de Pages: 11 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-bruckert-brainpool-for-tls13-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8734 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8734 Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Brainpool curves were an option for authentication and key exchange in the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol version 1.2 but were deprecated by the IETF for use with TLS version 1.3 because they had little usage. However, these curves have not been shown to have significant cryptographical weaknesses, and there is some interest in using several of these curves in TLS 1.3. This document provides the necessary protocol mechanisms for using ECC Brainpool curves in TLS 1.3. This approach is not endorsed by the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Feb 21 22:31:06 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE74120128 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:31:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mhOeJ1db8nkW for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:31:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F056212013C for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:31:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FAA8F406DB; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:30:54 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 45203F406DA; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:30:53 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200222063053.45203F406DA@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:30:53 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8489_on_Session_Traversal_Utilities_for?= =?utf-8?q?_NAT_=28STUN=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tram@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8489 Title: Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Author: M. Petit-Huguenin, G. Salgueiro, J. Rosenberg, D. Wing, R. Mahy, P. Matthews Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: February 2020 Mailbox: marc@petit-huguenin.org, gsalguei@cisco.com, jdrosen@jdrosen.net, dwing-ietf@fuggles.com, rohan.ietf@gmail.com, philip_matthews@magma.ca Pages: 67 Obsoletes: RFC 5389 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-tram-stunbis-21.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8489 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8489 Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) is a protocol that serves as a tool for other protocols in dealing with NAT traversal. It can be used by an endpoint to determine the IP address and port allocated to it by a NAT. It can also be used to check connectivity between two endpoints and as a keep-alive protocol to maintain NAT bindings. STUN works with many existing NATs and does not require any special behavior from them. STUN is not a NAT traversal solution by itself. Rather, it is a tool to be used in the context of a NAT traversal solution. This document obsoletes RFC 5389. This document is a product of the TURN Revised and Modernized Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. [Note: This RFC is intentionally not published in the v3 format.] This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Feb 21 22:31:24 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC1D120289 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:31:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BwF3QM-J6eRc for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:31:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D686A120828 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:31:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A612F40721; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:30:59 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 79FD2F4071A; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:30:58 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200222063058.79FD2F4071A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 22:30:58 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8656_on_Traversal_Using_Relays_around_N?= =?utf-8?q?AT_=28TURN=29=3A_Relay_Extensions_to_Session_Traversal_Utilitie?= =?utf-8?q?s_for_NAT_=28STUN=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tram@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8656 Title: Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN): Relay Extensions to Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Author: T. Reddy, Ed., A. Johnston, Ed., P. Matthews, J. Rosenberg Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: February 2020 Mailbox: kondtir@gmail.com, alan.b.johnston@gmail.com, philip_matthews@magma.ca, jdrosen@jdrosen.net Pages: 79 Obsoletes: RFC 5766, RFC 6156 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-tram-turnbis-29.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8656 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8656 If a host is located behind a NAT, it can be impossible for that host to communicate directly with other hosts (peers) in certain situations. In these situations, it is necessary for the host to use the services of an intermediate node that acts as a communication relay. This specification defines a protocol, called "Traversal Using Relays around NAT" (TURN), that allows the host to control the operation of the relay and to exchange packets with its peers using the relay. TURN differs from other relay control protocols in that it allows a client to communicate with multiple peers using a single relay address. The TURN protocol was designed to be used as part of the Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) approach to NAT traversal, though it can also be used without ICE. This document obsoletes RFCs 5766 and 6156. This document is a product of the TURN Revised and Modernized Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sat Feb 22 15:05:50 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB7B3A0A30 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:05:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p25D0_67iyXM for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:05:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E6C03A0A33 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:05:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D2EF406D5; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:05:40 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 86D30F406CC; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:05:39 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200222230539.86D30F406CC@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:05:39 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8706_on_Restart_Signaling_for_IS-IS?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lsr@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8706 Title: Restart Signaling for IS-IS Author: L. Ginsberg, P. Wells Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: February 2020 Mailbox: ginsberg@cisco.com, pauwells@cisco.com Pages: 22 Obsoletes: RFC 5306 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5306bis-09.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8706 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8706 This document describes a mechanism for a restarting router to signal to its neighbors that it is restarting, allowing them to reestablish their adjacencies without cycling through the DOWN state while still correctly initiating database synchronization. This document additionally describes a mechanism for a router to signal its neighbors that it is preparing to initiate a restart while maintaining forwarding-plane state. This allows the neighbors to maintain their adjacencies until the router has restarted but also allows the neighbors to bring the adjacencies down in the event of other topology changes. This document additionally describes a mechanism for a restarting router to determine when it has achieved Link State Protocol Data Unit (LSP) database synchronization with its neighbors and a mechanism to optimize LSP database synchronization while minimizing transient routing disruption when a router starts. This document obsoletes RFC 5306. This document is a product of the Link State Routing Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sat Feb 22 15:06:11 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5423A0AB0 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:06:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WQKb9DVa2mPe for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:06:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 668D03A0A52 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:06:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E14F40704; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:05:48 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 52487F406F7; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:05:47 -0800 (PST) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200222230547.52487F406F7@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:05:47 -0800 (PST) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8740_on_Using_TLS_1=2E3_with_HTTP/2?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8740 Title: Using TLS 1.3 with HTTP/2 Author: D. Benjamin Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: February 2020 Mailbox: davidben@google.com Pages: 5 Updates: RFC 7540 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-tls13-03.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8740 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8740 This document updates RFC 7540 by forbidding TLS 1.3 post-handshake authentication, as an analog to the existing TLS 1.2 renegotiation restriction. This document is a product of the HTTP Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org