From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Apr 1 09:22:55 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1EA3A1286 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:22:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yguKkRUCqt4p for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AEE63A1288 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C74F406F6; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:22:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id EBBEBF406D8; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:22:47 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200401162247.EBBEBF406D8@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8771_on_The_Internationalized_Deliberat?= =?utf-8?q?ely_Unreadable_Network_NOtation_=28I-DUNNO=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8771 Title: The Internationalized Deliberately Unreadable Network NOtation (I-DUNNO) Author: A. Mayrhofer, J. Hague Status: Experimental Stream: Independent Date: 1 April 2020 Mailbox: alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at, jim@sinodun.com Pages: 10 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-mayrhofer-i-dunno-02.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8771 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8771 Domain Names were designed for humans, IP addresses were not. But more than 30 years after the introduction of the DNS, a minority of mankind persists in invading the realm of machine-to-machine communication by reading, writing, misspelling, memorizing, permuting, and confusing IP addresses. This memo describes the Internationalized Deliberately Unreadable Network NOtation ("I-DUNNO"), a notation designed to replace current textual representations of IP addresses with something that is not only more concise but will also discourage this small, but obviously important, subset of human activity. EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Apr 1 09:23:41 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533583A1442 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:23:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jMBQT3mIXkki for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAA453A1363 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471BEF4071F; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:23:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E4B9EF4071F; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:23:09 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200401162309.E4B9EF4071F@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8774_on_The_Quantum_Bug?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8774 Title: The Quantum Bug Author: M. Welzl Status: Informational Stream: Independent Date: 1 April 2020 Mailbox: michawe@ifi.uio.no Pages: 6 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-welzl-quantumbug-00.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8774 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8774 The age of quantum networking is upon us, and with it comes "entanglement": a procedure in which a state (i.e., a bit) can be transferred instantly, with no measurable delay between peers. This will lead to a perceived round-trip time of zero seconds on some Internet paths, a capability which was not predicted and so not included as a possibility in many protocol specifications. Worse than the millennium bug, this unexpected value is bound to cause serious Internet failures unless the specifications are fixed in time. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Apr 9 10:20:35 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E5C3A0CAA for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:20:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FaepLstUxu1C for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:20:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9048F3A0CB5 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E80F40722; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:20:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A9E82F406F6; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:20:17 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200409172017.A9E82F406F6@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:20:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8770_on_Host_Router_Support_for_OSPFv2?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lsr@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8770 Title: Host Router Support for OSPFv2 Author: K. Patel, P. Pillay-Esnault, M. Bhardwaj, S. Bayraktar Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: April 2020 Mailbox: keyur@arrcus.com, padma.ietf@gmail.com, manbhard@cisco.com, serpil@cisco.com Pages: 8 Updates: RFC 6987 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-12.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8770 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8770 The Open Shortest Path First Version 2 (OSPFv2) protocol does not have a mechanism for a node to repel transit traffic if it is on the shortest path. This document defines a bit called the Host-bit (H-bit). This bit enables a router to advertise that it is a non-transit router. This document also describes the changes needed to support the H-bit in the domain. In addition, this document updates RFC 6987 to advertise Type 2 External and Not-So-Stubby Area (NSSA) Link State Advertisements (LSAs) (RFC 3101) with a high cost in order to repel traffic effectively. This document is a product of the Link State Routing Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon Apr 13 14:12:27 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801873A1E3C for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:12:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PY5Ykkdugita for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 736F13A1E3D for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE7FF40744; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:12:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8E14FF40743; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:12:06 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200413211206.8E14FF40743@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8778_on_Use_of_the_HSS/LMS_Hash-Based_S?= =?utf-8?q?ignature_Algorithm_with_CBOR_Object_Signing_and_Encryption_=28C?= =?utf-8?q?OSE=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, cose@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8778 Title: Use of the HSS/LMS Hash-Based Signature Algorithm with CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) Author: R. Housley Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: April 2020 Mailbox: housley@vigilsec.com Pages: 15 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-cose-hash-sig-09.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8778 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8778 This document specifies the conventions for using the Hierarchical Signature System (HSS) / Leighton-Micali Signature (LMS) hash-based signature algorithm with the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) syntax. The HSS/LMS algorithm is one form of hash-based digital signature; it is described in RFC 8554. This document is a product of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Apr 15 19:40:08 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DAE3A099A for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:40:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tGxXcnqx4TMV for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A11B3A099C for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA7FF40750; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:39:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 58346F4074C; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:39:41 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200416023941.58346F4074C@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:39:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8724_on_SCHC=3A_Generic_Framework_for_S?= =?utf-8?q?tatic_Context_Header_Compression_and_Fragmentation?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lp-wan@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" QSBuZXcgUmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgQ29tbWVudHMgaXMgbm93IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBpbiBvbmxpbmUgUkZD IGxpYnJhcmllcy4KCiAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgUkZDIDg3MjQKCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGU6ICAg ICAgU0NIQzogR2VuZXJpYyBGcmFtZXdvcmsgZm9yIFN0YXRpYyAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICBDb250ZXh0IEhlYWRlciBDb21wcmVzc2lvbiBhbmQgRnJhZ21lbnRhdGlvbiAKICAgICAgICBB dXRob3I6ICAgICBBLiBNaW5hYnVybywgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgTC4gVG91dGFpbiwK ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBDLiBHb21leiwKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBELiBCYXJ0 aGVsLAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEpDLiBaw7rDsWlnYQogICAgICAgIFN0YXR1czogICAg IFN0YW5kYXJkcyBUcmFjawogICAgICAgIFN0cmVhbTogICAgIElFVEYKICAgICAgICBEYXRlOiAg ICAgICBBcHJpbCAyMDIwCiAgICAgICAgTWFpbGJveDogICAgYW5hQGFja2wuaW8sIAogICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgIGxhdXJlbnQudG91dGFpbkBpbXQtYXRsYW50aXF1ZS5mciwgCiAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgY2FybGVzZ29AZW50ZWwudXBjLmVkdSwgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ZG9taW5pcXVlLmJhcnRoZWxAb3JhbmdlLmNvbSwgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAganVhbmNh cmxvcy56dW5pZ2FAc2lnZm94LmNvbQogICAgICAgIFBhZ2VzOiAgICAgIDcxCiAgICAgICAgVXBk YXRlcy9PYnNvbGV0ZXMvU2VlQWxzbzogICBOb25lCgogICAgICAgIEktRCBUYWc6ICAgIGRyYWZ0 LWlldGYtbHB3YW4taXB2Ni1zdGF0aWMtY29udGV4dC1oYy0yNC50eHQKCiAgICAgICAgVVJMOiAg ICAgICAgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvaW5mby9yZmM4NzI0CgogICAgICAgIERP STogICAgICAgIDEwLjE3NDg3L1JGQzg3MjQKClRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgZGVmaW5lcyB0aGUgU3Rh dGljIENvbnRleHQgSGVhZGVyIENvbXByZXNzaW9uIGFuZApmcmFnbWVudGF0aW9uIChTQ0hDKSBm cmFtZXdvcmssIHdoaWNoIHByb3ZpZGVzIGJvdGggYSBoZWFkZXIKY29tcHJlc3Npb24gbWVjaGFu aXNtIGFuZCBhbiBvcHRpb25hbCBmcmFnbWVudGF0aW9uIG1lY2hhbmlzbS4gU0NIQwpoYXMgYmVl biBkZXNpZ25lZCB3aXRoIExvdy1Qb3dlciBXaWRlIEFyZWEgTmV0d29ya3MgKExQV0FOcykgaW4g bWluZC4KClNDSEMgY29tcHJlc3Npb24gaXMgYmFzZWQgb24gYSBjb21tb24gc3RhdGljIGNvbnRl eHQgc3RvcmVkIGJvdGggaW4KdGhlIExQV0FOIGRldmljZSBhbmQgaW4gdGhlIG5ldHdvcmsgaW5m cmFzdHJ1Y3R1cmUgc2lkZS4gVGhpcwpkb2N1bWVudCBkZWZpbmVzIGEgZ2VuZXJpYyBoZWFkZXIg Y29tcHJlc3Npb24gbWVjaGFuaXNtIGFuZCBpdHMKYXBwbGljYXRpb24gdG8gY29tcHJlc3MgSVB2 Ni9VRFAgaGVhZGVycy4KClRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgYWxzbyBzcGVjaWZpZXMgYW4gb3B0aW9uYWwg ZnJhZ21lbnRhdGlvbiBhbmQgcmVhc3NlbWJseQptZWNoYW5pc20uIEl0IGNhbiBiZSB1c2VkIHRv IHN1cHBvcnQgdGhlIElQdjYgTVRVIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50IG92ZXIKdGhlIExQV0FOIHRlY2hub2xv Z2llcy4gRnJhZ21lbnRhdGlvbiBpcyBuZWVkZWQgZm9yIElQdjYgZGF0YWdyYW1zCnRoYXQsIGFm dGVyIFNDSEMgY29tcHJlc3Npb24gb3Igd2hlbiBzdWNoIGNvbXByZXNzaW9uIHdhcyBub3QKcG9z c2libGUsIHN0aWxsIGV4Y2VlZCB0aGUgTGF5ZXIgMiBtYXhpbXVtIHBheWxvYWQgc2l6ZS4KClRo ZSBTQ0hDIGhlYWRlciBjb21wcmVzc2lvbiBhbmQgZnJhZ21lbnRhdGlvbiBtZWNoYW5pc21zIGFy ZQppbmRlcGVuZGVudCBvZiB0aGUgc3BlY2lmaWMgTFBXQU4gdGVjaG5vbG9neSBvdmVyIHdoaWNo IHRoZXkgYXJlCnVzZWQuIFRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgZGVmaW5lcyBnZW5lcmljIGZ1bmN0aW9uYWxp dGllcyBhbmQgb2ZmZXJzCmZsZXhpYmlsaXR5IHdpdGggcmVnYXJkIHRvIHBhcmFtZXRlciBzZXR0 aW5ncyBhbmQgbWVjaGFuaXNtIGNob2ljZXMuClRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgc3RhbmRhcmRpemVzIHRo ZSBleGNoYW5nZSBvdmVyIHRoZSBMUFdBTiBiZXR3ZWVuIHR3bwpTQ0hDIGVudGl0aWVzLiBTZXR0 aW5ncyBhbmQgY2hvaWNlcyBzcGVjaWZpYyB0byBhIHRlY2hub2xvZ3kgb3IgYQpwcm9kdWN0IGFy ZSBleHBlY3RlZCB0byBiZSBncm91cGVkIGludG8gcHJvZmlsZXMsIHdoaWNoIGFyZSBzcGVjaWZp ZWQKaW4gb3RoZXIgZG9jdW1lbnRzLiBEYXRhIG1vZGVscyBmb3IgdGhlIGNvbnRleHQgYW5kIHBy b2ZpbGVzIGFyZSBvdXQKb2Ygc2NvcGUuCgpUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGlzIGEgcHJvZHVjdCBvZiB0 aGUgSVB2NiBvdmVyIExvdyBQb3dlciBXaWRlLUFyZWEgTmV0d29ya3MgV29ya2luZyBHcm91cCBv ZiB0aGUgSUVURi4KClRoaXMgaXMgbm93IGEgUHJvcG9zZWQgU3RhbmRhcmQuCgpTVEFOREFSRFMg VFJBQ0s6IFRoaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgc3BlY2lmaWVzIGFuIEludGVybmV0IFN0YW5kYXJkcyBUcmFj awpwcm90b2NvbCBmb3IgdGhlIEludGVybmV0IGNvbW11bml0eSwgYW5kIHJlcXVlc3RzIGRpc2N1 c3Npb24gYW5kIHN1Z2dlc3Rpb25zCmZvciBpbXByb3ZlbWVudHMuICBQbGVhc2UgcmVmZXIgdG8g dGhlIGN1cnJlbnQgZWRpdGlvbiBvZiB0aGUgT2ZmaWNpYWwKSW50ZXJuZXQgUHJvdG9jb2wgU3Rh bmRhcmRzIChodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9zdGFuZGFyZHMpIGZvciB0aGUgCnN0 YW5kYXJkaXphdGlvbiBzdGF0ZSBhbmQgc3RhdHVzIG9mIHRoaXMgcHJvdG9jb2wuICBEaXN0cmli dXRpb24gb2YgdGhpcyAKbWVtbyBpcyB1bmxpbWl0ZWQuCgpUaGlzIGFubm91bmNlbWVudCBpcyBz ZW50IHRvIHRoZSBJRVRGLUFubm91bmNlIGFuZCByZmMtZGlzdCBsaXN0cy4KVG8gc3Vic2NyaWJl IG9yIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlLCBzZWUKICBodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3Rp bmZvL2lldGYtYW5ub3VuY2UKICBodHRwczovL21haWxtYW4ucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvbWFpbG1h bi9saXN0aW5mby9yZmMtZGlzdAoKRm9yIHNlYXJjaGluZyB0aGUgUkZDIHNlcmllcywgc2VlIGh0 dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL3NlYXJjaApGb3IgZG93bmxvYWRpbmcgUkZDcywgc2Vl IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL3JldHJpZXZlL2J1bGsKClJlcXVlc3RzIGZvciBz cGVjaWFsIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbiBzaG91bGQgYmUgYWRkcmVzc2VkIHRvIGVpdGhlciB0aGUKYXV0 aG9yIG9mIHRoZSBSRkMgaW4gcXVlc3Rpb24sIG9yIHRvIHJmYy1lZGl0b3JAcmZjLWVkaXRvci5v cmcuICBVbmxlc3MKc3BlY2lmaWNhbGx5IG5vdGVkIG90aGVyd2lzZSBvbiB0aGUgUkZDIGl0c2Vs ZiwgYWxsIFJGQ3MgYXJlIGZvcgp1bmxpbWl0ZWQgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uLgoKClRoZSBSRkMgRWRp dG9yIFRlYW0KQXNzb2NpYXRpb24gTWFuYWdlbWVudCBTb2x1dGlvbnMsIExMQwoKCl9fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCnJmYy1kaXN0IG1haWxpbmcg bGlzdApyZmMtZGlzdEByZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZwpodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9t YWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3JmYy1kaXN0Cmh0dHA6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcK From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Apr 15 23:25:20 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13D43A0FA5 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 23:25:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uPXLW4ypCxFv for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 23:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D4293A0FA7 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 23:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705E4F40750; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 23:24:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 60530F4074C; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 23:24:54 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200416062454.60530F4074C@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 23:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8753_on_Internationalized_Domain_Names_?= =?utf-8?q?for_Applications_=28IDNA=29_Review_for_New_Unicode_Versions?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" QSBuZXcgUmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgQ29tbWVudHMgaXMgbm93IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBpbiBvbmxpbmUgUkZD IGxpYnJhcmllcy4KCiAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgUkZDIDg3NTMKCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGU6ICAg ICAgSW50ZXJuYXRpb25hbGl6ZWQgRG9tYWluIE5hbWVzIGZvciBBcHBsaWNhdGlvbnMgCiAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKElETkEpIFJldmlldyBmb3IgTmV3IFVuaWNvZGUgVmVyc2lvbnMgCiAg ICAgICAgQXV0aG9yOiAgICAgSi4gS2xlbnNpbiwKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBQLiBGw6Rs dHN0csO2bQogICAgICAgIFN0YXR1czogICAgIFN0YW5kYXJkcyBUcmFjawogICAgICAgIFN0cmVh bTogICAgIElFVEYKICAgICAgICBEYXRlOiAgICAgICBBcHJpbCAyMDIwCiAgICAgICAgTWFpbGJv eDogICAgam9obi1pZXRmQGpjay5jb20sIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHBhZkBuZXRub2Qu c2UKICAgICAgICBQYWdlczogICAgICAxMwogICAgICAgIFVwZGF0ZXM6ICAgIFJGQyA1ODkyCgog ICAgICAgIEktRCBUYWc6ICAgIGRyYWZ0LWtsZW5zaW4taWRuYS11bmljb2RlLXJldmlldy0wNS50 eHQKCiAgICAgICAgVVJMOiAgICAgICAgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvaW5mby9y ZmM4NzUzCgogICAgICAgIERPSTogICAgICAgIDEwLjE3NDg3L1JGQzg3NTMKClRoZSBzdGFuZGFy ZHMgZm9yIEludGVybmF0aW9uYWxpemVkIERvbWFpbiBOYW1lcyBpbiBBcHBsaWNhdGlvbnMKKElE TkEpIHJlcXVpcmUgYSByZXZpZXcgb2YgZWFjaCBuZXcgdmVyc2lvbiBvZiBVbmljb2RlIHRvIGRl dGVybWluZQp3aGV0aGVyIGluY29tcGF0aWJpbGl0aWVzIHdpdGggcHJpb3IgdmVyc2lvbnMgb3Ig b3RoZXIgaXNzdWVzIGV4aXN0CmFuZCwgd2hlcmUgYXBwcm9wcmlhdGUsIHRvIGFsbG93IHRoZSBJ RVRGIHRvIGRlY2lkZSBvbiB0aGUgdHJhZGUtb2ZmcwpiZXR3ZWVuIGNvbXBhdGliaWxpdHkgd2l0 aCBwcmlvciBJRE5BIHZlcnNpb25zIGFuZCBjb21wYXRpYmlsaXR5IHdpdGgKVW5pY29kZSBnb2lu ZyBmb3J3YXJkLiAgVGhhdCByZXF1aXJlbWVudCwgYW5kIGl0cyByZWxhdGlvbnNoaXAgdG8KdGFi bGVzIG1haW50YWluZWQgYnkgSUFOQSwgaGFzIGNhdXNlZCBzaWduaWZpY2FudCBjb25mdXNpb24g aW4gdGhlCnBhc3QuICBUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IG1ha2VzIGFkanVzdG1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSByZXZp ZXcgcHJvY2VkdXJlIGJhc2VkCm9uIGV4cGVyaWVuY2UgYW5kIHVwZGF0ZXMgSUROQSwgc3BlY2lm aWNhbGx5IFJGQyA1ODkyLCB0byByZWZsZWN0CnRob3NlIGNoYW5nZXMgYW5kIHRvIGNsYXJpZnkg dGhlIHZhcmlvdXMgcmVsYXRpb25zaGlwcyBpbnZvbHZlZC4gIEl0CmFsc28gbWFrZXMgb3RoZXIg bWlub3IgYWRqdXN0bWVudHMgdG8gYWxpZ24gdGhhdCBkb2N1bWVudCB3aXRoCmV4cGVyaWVuY2Uu CgpUaGlzIGlzIG5vdyBhIFByb3Bvc2VkIFN0YW5kYXJkLgoKU1RBTkRBUkRTIFRSQUNLOiBUaGlz IGRvY3VtZW50IHNwZWNpZmllcyBhbiBJbnRlcm5ldCBTdGFuZGFyZHMgVHJhY2sKcHJvdG9jb2wg Zm9yIHRoZSBJbnRlcm5ldCBjb21tdW5pdHksIGFuZCByZXF1ZXN0cyBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIGFuZCBz dWdnZXN0aW9ucwpmb3IgaW1wcm92ZW1lbnRzLiAgUGxlYXNlIHJlZmVyIHRvIHRoZSBjdXJyZW50 IGVkaXRpb24gb2YgdGhlIE9mZmljaWFsCkludGVybmV0IFByb3RvY29sIFN0YW5kYXJkcyAoaHR0 cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvc3RhbmRhcmRzKSBmb3IgdGhlIApzdGFuZGFyZGl6YXRp b24gc3RhdGUgYW5kIHN0YXR1cyBvZiB0aGlzIHByb3RvY29sLiAgRGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIG9mIHRo aXMgCm1lbW8gaXMgdW5saW1pdGVkLgoKVGhpcyBhbm5vdW5jZW1lbnQgaXMgc2VudCB0byB0aGUg SUVURi1Bbm5vdW5jZSBhbmQgcmZjLWRpc3QgbGlzdHMuClRvIHN1YnNjcmliZSBvciB1bnN1YnNj cmliZSwgc2VlCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pZXRmLWFu bm91bmNlCiAgaHR0cHM6Ly9tYWlsbWFuLnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8v cmZjLWRpc3QKCkZvciBzZWFyY2hpbmcgdGhlIFJGQyBzZXJpZXMsIHNlZSBodHRwczovL3d3dy5y ZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9zZWFyY2gKRm9yIGRvd25sb2FkaW5nIFJGQ3MsIHNlZSBodHRwczovL3d3 dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9yZXRyaWV2ZS9idWxrCgpSZXF1ZXN0cyBmb3Igc3BlY2lhbCBkaXN0 cmlidXRpb24gc2hvdWxkIGJlIGFkZHJlc3NlZCB0byBlaXRoZXIgdGhlCmF1dGhvciBvZiB0aGUg UkZDIGluIHF1ZXN0aW9uLCBvciB0byByZmMtZWRpdG9yQHJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnLiAgVW5sZXNz CnNwZWNpZmljYWxseSBub3RlZCBvdGhlcndpc2Ugb24gdGhlIFJGQyBpdHNlbGYsIGFsbCBSRkNz IGFyZSBmb3IKdW5saW1pdGVkIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbi4KCgpUaGUgUkZDIEVkaXRvciBUZWFtCkFz c29jaWF0aW9uIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgU29sdXRpb25zLCBMTEMKCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwpyZmMtZGlzdCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKcmZjLWRp c3RAcmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0 aW5mby9yZmMtZGlzdApodHRwOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnCg== From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Apr 16 17:09:17 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F393B3A13FA for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:09:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RAit9J_IabUW for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 770B53A13FC for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F56F40729; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:08:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1CF5EF40725; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:08:53 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200417000853.1CF5EF40725@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:08:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8761_on_Video_Codec_Requirements_and_Ev?= =?utf-8?q?aluation_Methodology?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, video-codec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8761 Title: Video Codec Requirements and Evaluation Methodology Author: A. Filippov, A. Norkin, J.R. Alvarez Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: April 2020 Mailbox: alexey.filippov@huawei.com, anorkin@netflix.com, j.alvarez@ieee.org Pages: 22 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-netvc-requirements-10.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8761 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8761 This document provides requirements for a video codec designed mainly for use over the Internet. In addition, this document describes an evaluation methodology for measuring the compression efficiency to determine whether or not the stated requirements have been fulfilled. This document is a product of the Internet Video Codec Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Apr 16 18:30:21 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE1C3A1543 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:30:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IzO24FdRdHba for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:30:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2ED03A153A for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:30:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291DCF4071D; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:29:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A77CCF4071A; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:29:53 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org, irtf-announce@irtf.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200417012953.A77CCF4071A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8763_on_Deployment_Considerations_for_I?= =?utf-8?q?nformation-Centric_Networking_=28ICN=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, icnrg@irtf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8763 Title: Deployment Considerations for Information-Centric Networking (ICN) Author: A. Rahman, D. Trossen, D. Kutscher, R. Ravindran Status: Informational Stream: IRTF Date: April 2020 Mailbox: Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com, dirk.trossen@huawei.com, ietf@dkutscher.net, ravi.ravindran@gmail.com Pages: 30 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-irtf-icnrg-deployment-guidelines-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8763 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8763 Information-Centric Networking (ICN) is now reaching technological maturity after many years of fundamental research and experimentation. This document provides a number of deployment considerations in the interest of helping the ICN community move forward to the next step of live deployments. First, the major deployment configurations for ICN are described, including the key overlay and underlay approaches. Then, proposed deployment migration paths are outlined to address major practical issues, such as network and application migration. Next, selected ICN trial experiences are summarized. Finally, protocol areas that require further standardization are identified to facilitate future interoperable ICN deployments. This document is a product of the Information-Centric Networking Research Group (ICNRG). This document is a product of the Information-Centric Networking Research Group of the IRTF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce, rfc-dist and IRTF-Announce lists.To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-announce For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Apr 22 18:54:53 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E503A109A for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:54:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0R2nHWiXvQW8 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E195D3A109C for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:54:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C0FF40713; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:54:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 13C32F4070F; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:54:43 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200423015443.13C32F4070F@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8775_on_PIM_Designated_Router_Load_Bala?= =?utf-8?q?ncing?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pim@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8775 Title: PIM Designated Router Load Balancing Author: Y. Cai, H. Ou, S. Vallepalli, M. Mishra, S. Venaas, A. Green Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: April 2020 Mailbox: yiqun.cai@alibaba-inc.com, heidi.ou@alibaba-inc.com, vallepal@yahoo.com, mankamis@cisco.com, stig@cisco.com, andy.da.green@bt.com Pages: 18 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pim-drlb-15.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8775 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8775 On a multi-access network, one of the PIM-SM (PIM Sparse Mode) routers is elected as a Designated Router. One of the responsibilities of the Designated Router is to track local multicast listeners and forward data to these listeners if the group is operating in PIM-SM. This document specifies a modification to the PIM-SM protocol that allows more than one of the PIM-SM routers to take on this responsibility so that the forwarding load can be distributed among multiple routers. This document is a product of the Protocols for IP Multicast Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Apr 24 09:00:12 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB66B3A0E84 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 09:00:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FgFnL89ilcK5 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 09:00:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2DB53A0E5B for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 09:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA533F406CB; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:59:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E4D86F406C4; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:59:58 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200424155958.E4D86F406C4@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8777_on_DNS_Reverse_IP_Automatic_Multic?= =?utf-8?q?ast_Tunneling_=28AMT=29_Discovery?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mboned@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8777 Title: DNS Reverse IP Automatic Multicast Tunneling (AMT) Discovery Author: J. Holland Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: April 2020 Mailbox: jakeholland.net@gmail.com Pages: 33 Updates: RFC 7450 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery-13.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8777 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8777 This document updates RFC 7450, "Automatic Multicast Tunneling" (or AMT), by modifying the relay discovery process. A new DNS resource record named AMTRELAY is defined for publishing AMT relays for source-specific multicast channels. The reverse IP DNS zone for a multicast sender's IP address is configured to use AMTRELAY resource records to advertise a set of AMT relays that can receive and forward multicast traffic from that sender over an AMT tunnel. Other extensions and clarifications to the relay discovery process are also defined. This document is a product of the MBONE Deployment Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Apr 24 11:37:53 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322E53A0433 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:37:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3q7FWbooPRko for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F7793A0437 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF53F406C4; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:37:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4AD4CF406C3; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:37:42 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200424183742.4AD4CF406C3@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:37:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8781_on_Discovering_PREF64_in_Router_Ad?= =?utf-8?q?vertisements?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, ipv6@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8781 Title: Discovering PREF64 in Router Advertisements Author: L. Colitti, J. Linkova Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: April 2020 Mailbox: lorenzo@google.com, furry@google.com Pages: 10 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-6man-ra-pref64-09.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8781 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8781 This document specifies a Neighbor Discovery option to be used in Router Advertisements (RAs) to communicate prefixes of Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 clients to IPv4 servers (NAT64) to hosts. This document is a product of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Apr 28 16:55:43 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA073A0AFE for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:55:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7qiogTdtnCAk for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:55:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FCD73A0AFD for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:55:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161EBF40739; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:55:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 12CDAF40725; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:55:26 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200428235526.12CDAF40725@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?BCP_227=2C_RFC_8758_on_Deprecating_RC4_in_S?= =?utf-8?q?ecure_Shell_=28SSH=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, curdle@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 227 RFC 8758 Title: Deprecating RC4 in Secure Shell (SSH) Author: L. Velvindron Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: April 2020 Mailbox: logan@cyberstorm.mu Pages: 5 Updates: RFC 4253 See Also: BCP 227 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-curdle-rc4-die-die-die-18.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8758 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8758 This document deprecates RC4 in Secure Shell (SSH). Therefore, this document formally moves RFC 4345 to Historic status. This document is a product of the CURves, Deprecating and a Little more Encryption Working Group of the IETF. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Apr 30 12:22:34 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4323A0D85 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:22:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fmCPcv7CSh1j for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 706E03A10B6 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A120F40742; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:22:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5A99BF4073E; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:22:13 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200430192213.5A99BF4073E@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8723_on_Double_Encryption_Procedures_fo?= =?utf-8?q?r_the_Secure_Real-Time_Transport_Protocol_=28SRTP=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, perc@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8723 Title: Double Encryption Procedures for the Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Author: C. Jennings, P. Jones, R. Barnes, A.B. Roach Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: April 2020 Mailbox: fluffy@iii.ca, paulej@packetizer.com, rlb@ipv.sx, adam@nostrum.com Pages: 18 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-perc-double-12.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8723 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8723 In some conferencing scenarios, it is desirable for an intermediary to be able to manipulate some parameters in Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) packets, while still providing strong end-to-end security guarantees. This document defines a cryptographic transform for the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) that uses two separate but related cryptographic operations to provide hop-by-hop and end-to-end security guarantees. Both the end-to-end and hop-by-hop cryptographic algorithms can utilize an authenticated encryption with associated data (AEAD) algorithm or take advantage of future SRTP transforms with different properties. This document is a product of the Privacy Enhanced RTP Conferencing Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org