From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon May 11 17:11:06 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08ACA3A0DCB for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:11:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x9o-lFyKFtoi for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:11:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14B373A0DC7 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:11:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89AE7F4074D; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:10:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4B8F6F4074C; Mon, 11 May 2020 17:10:48 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200512001048.4B8F6F4074C@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 17:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8772_on_The_China_Mobile=2C_Huawei=2C_a?= =?utf-8?q?nd_ZTE_Broadband_Network_Gateway_=28BNG=29_Simple_Control_and_U?= =?utf-8?q?ser_Plane_Separation_Protocol_=28S-CUSP=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8772 Title: The China Mobile, Huawei, and ZTE Broadband Network Gateway (BNG) Simple Control and User Plane Separation Protocol (S-CUSP) Author: S. Hu, D. Eastlake, F. Qin, T. Chua, D. Huang Status: Informational Stream: Independent Date: May 2020 Mailbox: hushujun@chinamobile.com, d3e3e3@gmail.com, qinfengwei@chinamobile.com, teemong@singtel.com, huang.guangping@zte.com.cn Pages: 124 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-chz-simple-cu-separation-bng-protocol-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8772 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8772 A Broadband Network Gateway (BNG) in a fixed wireline access network is an Ethernet-centric IP edge router and the aggregation point for subscriber traffic. Control and User Plane Separation (CUPS) for such a BNG improves flexibility and scalability but requires various communication between the User Plane (UP) and the Control Plane (CP). China Mobile, Huawei Technologies, and ZTE have developed a simple CUPS control channel protocol to support such communication: the Simple Control and User Plane Separation Protocol (S-CUSP). S-CUSP is defined in this document. This document is not an IETF standard and does not have IETF consensus. S-CUSP is presented here to make its specification conveniently available to the Internet community to enable diagnosis and interoperability. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue May 26 23:31:11 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10433A053F for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 23:31:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2LOHruQ3uyKL for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 23:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60C923A0542 for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 23:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6476DF4074D; Tue, 26 May 2020 23:30:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 0CDD2F4071B; Tue, 26 May 2020 23:30:57 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200527063057.0CDD2F4071B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 23:30:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?BCP_10=2C_RFC_8788_on_Eligibility_for_the_2?= =?utf-8?q?020-2021_Nominating_Committee?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 10 RFC 8788 Title: Eligibility for the 2020-2021 Nominating Committee Author: B. Leiba Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: May 2020 Mailbox: barryleiba@computer.org Pages: 5 See Also: BCP 10 I-D Tag: draft-iesg-nomcom-eligibility-2020-03.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8788 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8788 The 2020-2021 Nominating Committee (NomCom) is to be formed between the IETF 107 and IETF 108 meetings, and the issue of eligibility of who can serve on that NomCom needs clarification. This document provides a one-time interpretation of the eligibility rules that is required for the exceptional situation of the cancellation of the in-person IETF 107 meeting. This document only affects the seating of the 2020-2021 NomCom and any rules or processes that relate to NomCom eligibility before IETF 108; it does not set a precedent to be applied in the future. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sat May 30 23:14:02 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BFD3A1261 for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 23:14:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FHT82KKfUjMj for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 23:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55EAC3A1263 for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 23:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA67F4071D; Sat, 30 May 2020 23:13:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2C772F4071C; Sat, 30 May 2020 23:13:43 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200531061343.2C772F4071C@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 23:13:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8782_on_Distributed_Denial-of-Service_O?= =?utf-8?q?pen_Threat_Signaling_=28DOTS=29_Signal_Channel_Specification?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dots@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8782 Title: Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification Author: T. Reddy.K, Ed., M. Boucadair, Ed., P. Patil, A. Mortensen, N. Teague Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: May 2020 Mailbox: kondtir@gmail.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, praspati@cisco.com, andrew@moretension.com, nteague@ironmountain.co.uk Pages: 100 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel-41.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8782 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8782 This document specifies the Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) signal channel, a protocol for signaling the need for protection against Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks to a server capable of enabling network traffic mitigation on behalf of the requesting client. A companion document defines the DOTS data channel, a separate reliable communication layer for DOTS management and configuration purposes. This document is a product of the DDoS Open Threat Signaling Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sat May 30 23:14:30 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066953A135F for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 23:14:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P2VxHCGIZNG5 for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 23:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDFF73A1328 for ; Sat, 30 May 2020 23:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98ACF4073A; Sat, 30 May 2020 23:13:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 475A0F40739; Sat, 30 May 2020 23:13:48 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200531061348.475A0F40739@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 23:13:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8783_on_Distributed_Denial-of-Service_O?= =?utf-8?q?pen_Threat_Signaling_=28DOTS=29_Data_Channel_Specification?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dots@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8783 Title: Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Data Channel Specification Author: M. Boucadair, Ed., T. Reddy.K, Ed. Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: May 2020 Mailbox: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, kondtir@gmail.com Pages: 66 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-31.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8783 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8783 The document specifies a Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) data channel used for bulk exchange of data that cannot easily or appropriately communicated through the DOTS signal channel under attack conditions. This is a companion document to "Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification" (RFC 8782). This document is a product of the DDoS Open Threat Signaling Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sun May 31 11:59:37 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20803A0BDD for ; Sun, 31 May 2020 11:59:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sC42Vh1fYEmQ for ; Sun, 31 May 2020 11:59:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 702BB3A0BB1 for ; Sun, 31 May 2020 11:59:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEA3F406DB; Sun, 31 May 2020 11:59:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5564FF406D8; Sun, 31 May 2020 11:59:18 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200531185918.5564FF406D8@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 11:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8786_on_Updated_Rules_for_Processing_St?= =?utf-8?q?ateful_PCE_Request_Parameters_Flags?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8786 Title: Updated Rules for Processing Stateful PCE Request Parameters Flags Author: A. Farrel Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: May 2020 Mailbox: adrian@olddog.co.uk Pages: 6 Updates: RFC 8231 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-01.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8786 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8786 Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) to support stateful Path Computation Elements (PCEs) are defined in RFC 8231. One of the extensions is the Stateful PCE Request Parameters (SRP) object. That object includes a Flags field that is a set of 32 bit flags, and RFC 8281 defines an IANA registry for tracking assigned flags. However, RFC 8231 does not explain how an implementation should set unassigned flags in transmitted messages, nor how an implementation should process unassigned, unknown, or unsupported flags in received messages. This document updates RFC 8231 by defining the correct behaviors. This document is a product of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sun May 31 13:59:37 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DCE3A0CD1 for ; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:59:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQGAFm0Fxp1B for ; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:59:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FEF13A0CCE for ; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:59:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2EFF40704; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:59:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C16FBF406F6; Sun, 31 May 2020 13:59:18 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200531205918.C16FBF406F6@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 13:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8787_on_Location_Source_Parameter_for_t?= =?utf-8?q?he_SIP_Geolocation_Header_Field?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, sipcore@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8787 Title: Location Source Parameter for the SIP Geolocation Header Field Author: J. Winterbottom, R. Jesske, B. Chatras, A. Hutton Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: May 2020 Mailbox: a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com, r.jesske@telekom.de, bruno.chatras@orange.com, andrew.hutton@atos.net Pages: 8 Updates: RFC 6442 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-sipcore-locparam-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8787 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8787 There are some circumstances where a Geolocation header field may contain more than one locationValue. Knowing the identity of the node adding the locationValue allows the recipient more freedom in selecting the value to look at first rather than relying solely on the order of the locationValues. This document defines the "loc-src" parameter so that the entity adding the locationValue to the Geolocation header field can identify itself using its hostname. This document updates RFC 6442. This document is a product of the Session Initiation Protocol Core Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org