From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Jun 10 17:30:22 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8923A0CED for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:30:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YSCeS6Goo2o2 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5345F3A15CE for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DE4F4075C; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:29:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6532CF4075B; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:29:54 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200611002954.6532CF4075B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8776_on_Common_YANG_Data_Types_for_Traf?= =?utf-8?q?fic_Engineering?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, teas@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8776 Title: Common YANG Data Types for Traffic Engineering Author: T. Saad, R. Gandhi, X. Liu, V. Beeram, I. Bryskin Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: June 2020 Mailbox: tsaad@juniper.net, rgandhi@cisco.com, xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com, vbeeram@juniper.net, i_bryskin@yahoo.com Pages: 84 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-13.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8776 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8776 This document defines a collection of common data types and groupings in YANG data modeling language. These derived common types and groupings are intended to be imported by modules that model Traffic Engineering (TE) configuration and state capabilities. This document is a product of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Jun 17 16:44:45 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BA13A0CE8 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:44:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Je94o9wsAhZ9 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EF5C3A0A24 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4CBF40713; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:44:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id EA83CF40712; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:44:36 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200617234436.EA83CF40712@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8791_on_YANG_Data_Structure_Extensions?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" QSBuZXcgUmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgQ29tbWVudHMgaXMgbm93IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBpbiBvbmxpbmUgUkZD IGxpYnJhcmllcy4KCiAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgUkZDIDg3OTEKCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGU6ICAg ICAgWUFORyBEYXRhIFN0cnVjdHVyZSBFeHRlbnNpb25zIAogICAgICAgIEF1dGhvcjogICAgIEEu IEJpZXJtYW4sIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIE0uIEJqw7Zya2x1bmQsCiAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgSy4gV2F0c2VuCiAgICAgICAgU3RhdHVzOiAgICAgU3RhbmRhcmRzIFRyYWNrCiAg ICAgICAgU3RyZWFtOiAgICAgSUVURgogICAgICAgIERhdGU6ICAgICAgIEp1bmUgMjAyMAogICAg ICAgIE1haWxib3g6ICAgIGFuZHlAeXVtYXdvcmtzLmNvbSwgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg bWJqK2lldGZANDY2OC5zZSwgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAga2VudCtpZXRmQHdhdHNlbi5u ZXQKICAgICAgICBQYWdlczogICAgICAxNgogICAgICAgIFVwZGF0ZXM6ICAgIFJGQyA4MzQwCgog ICAgICAgIEktRCBUYWc6ICAgIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtbmV0bW9kLXlhbmctZGF0YS1leHQtMDUudHh0 CgogICAgICAgIFVSTDogICAgICAgIGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL2luZm8vcmZj ODc5MQoKICAgICAgICBET0k6ICAgICAgICAxMC4xNzQ4Ny9SRkM4NzkxCgpUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50 IGRlc2NyaWJlcyBZQU5HIG1lY2hhbmlzbXMgZm9yIGRlZmluaW5nIGFic3RyYWN0IGRhdGEKc3Ry dWN0dXJlcyB3aXRoIFlBTkcuCgpUaGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGlzIGEgcHJvZHVjdCBvZiB0aGUgTmV0 d29yayBNb2RlbGluZyBXb3JraW5nIEdyb3VwIG9mIHRoZSBJRVRGLgoKVGhpcyBpcyBub3cgYSBQ cm9wb3NlZCBTdGFuZGFyZC4KClNUQU5EQVJEUyBUUkFDSzogVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBzcGVjaWZp ZXMgYW4gSW50ZXJuZXQgU3RhbmRhcmRzIFRyYWNrCnByb3RvY29sIGZvciB0aGUgSW50ZXJuZXQg Y29tbXVuaXR5LCBhbmQgcmVxdWVzdHMgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiBhbmQgc3VnZ2VzdGlvbnMKZm9yIGlt cHJvdmVtZW50cy4gIFBsZWFzZSByZWZlciB0byB0aGUgY3VycmVudCBlZGl0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBP ZmZpY2lhbApJbnRlcm5ldCBQcm90b2NvbCBTdGFuZGFyZHMgKGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0 b3Iub3JnL3N0YW5kYXJkcykgZm9yIHRoZSAKc3RhbmRhcmRpemF0aW9uIHN0YXRlIGFuZCBzdGF0 dXMgb2YgdGhpcyBwcm90b2NvbC4gIERpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbiBvZiB0aGlzIAptZW1vIGlzIHVubGlt aXRlZC4KClRoaXMgYW5ub3VuY2VtZW50IGlzIHNlbnQgdG8gdGhlIElFVEYtQW5ub3VuY2UgYW5k IHJmYy1kaXN0IGxpc3RzLgpUbyBzdWJzY3JpYmUgb3IgdW5zdWJzY3JpYmUsIHNlZQogIGh0dHBz Oi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vaWV0Zi1hbm5vdW5jZQogIGh0dHBzOi8v bWFpbG1hbi5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3JmYy1kaXN0CgpGb3Igc2Vh cmNoaW5nIHRoZSBSRkMgc2VyaWVzLCBzZWUgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvc2Vh cmNoCkZvciBkb3dubG9hZGluZyBSRkNzLCBzZWUgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcv cmV0cmlldmUvYnVsawoKUmVxdWVzdHMgZm9yIHNwZWNpYWwgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIHNob3VsZCBi ZSBhZGRyZXNzZWQgdG8gZWl0aGVyIHRoZQphdXRob3Igb2YgdGhlIFJGQyBpbiBxdWVzdGlvbiwg b3IgdG8gcmZjLWVkaXRvckByZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy4gIFVubGVzcwpzcGVjaWZpY2FsbHkgbm90 ZWQgb3RoZXJ3aXNlIG9uIHRoZSBSRkMgaXRzZWxmLCBhbGwgUkZDcyBhcmUgZm9yCnVubGltaXRl ZCBkaXN0cmlidXRpb24uCgoKVGhlIFJGQyBFZGl0b3IgVGVhbQpBc3NvY2lhdGlvbiBNYW5hZ2Vt ZW50IFNvbHV0aW9ucywgTExDCgoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX18KcmZjLWRpc3QgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0CnJmYy1kaXN0QHJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3Jn Cmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcmZjLWRpc3QKaHR0 cDovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZwo= From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Jun 17 18:13:51 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0343A03F2 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:13:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQGDfQCUWYwX for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C80C23A00D6 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C301F40713; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:13:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D9037F40712; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:13:41 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org, irtf-announce@irtf.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200618011341.D9037F40712@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:13:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8793_on_Information-Centric_Networking_?= =?utf-8?q?=28ICN=29=3A_Content-Centric_Networking_=28CCNx=29_and_Named_Da?= =?utf-8?q?ta_Networking_=28NDN=29_Terminology?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, icnrg@irtf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8793 Title: Information-Centric Networking (ICN): Content-Centric Networking (CCNx) and Named Data Networking (NDN) Terminology Author: B. Wissingh, C. Wood, A. Afanasyev, L. Zhang, D. Oran, C. Tschudin Status: Informational Stream: IRTF Date: June 2020 Mailbox: bastiaan.wissingh@tno.nl, caw@heapingbits.net, aa@cs.fiu.edu, lixia@cs.ucla.edu, daveoran@orandom.net, christian.tschudin@unibas.ch Pages: 17 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-irtf-icnrg-terminology-08.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8793 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8793 Information-Centric Networking (ICN) is a novel paradigm where network communications are accomplished by requesting named content instead of sending packets to destination addresses. Named Data Networking (NDN) and Content-Centric Networking (CCNx) are two prominent ICN architectures. This document provides an overview of the terminology and definitions that have been used in describing concepts in these two implementations of ICN. While there are other ICN architectures, they are not part of the NDN and CCNx concepts and as such are out of scope for this document. This document is a product of the Information-Centric Networking Research Group (ICNRG). This document is a product of the Information-Centric Networking Research Group of the IRTF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce, rfc-dist and IRTF-Announce lists.To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-announce For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Jun 17 18:43:40 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245713A09D6 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:43:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FSk3LdgFJzqs for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D9063A09CC for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02D1F40712; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:43:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 40EEEF40711; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:43:32 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200618014332.40EEEF40711@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?BCP_9=2C_RFC_8789_on_IETF_Stream_Documents_?= =?utf-8?q?Require_IETF_Rough_Consensus?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 9 RFC 8789 Title: IETF Stream Documents Require IETF Rough Consensus Author: J. Halpern, Ed., E. Rescorla, Ed. Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: June 2020 Mailbox: joel.halpern@ericsson.com, ekr@rtfm.com Pages: 4 Updates: RFC 2026 See Also: BCP 9 I-D Tag: draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-04.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8789 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8789 This document requires that the IETF never publish any IETF Stream RFCs without IETF rough consensus. This updates RFC 2026. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Jun 18 13:59:20 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6BC3A0DD2 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:59:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mh9UAUmPKE4U for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D90CB3A0F83 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:59:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDE6F40721; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:59:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id F409BF40720; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:59:10 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200618205910.F409BF40720@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8806_on_Running_a_Root_Server_Local_to_?= =?utf-8?q?a_Resolver?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dnsop@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8806 Title: Running a Root Server Local to a Resolver Author: W. Kumari, P. Hoffman Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: June 2020 Mailbox: warren@kumari.net, paul.hoffman@icann.org Pages: 12 Obsoletes: RFC 7706 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-12.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8806 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8806 Some DNS recursive resolvers have longer-than-desired round-trip times to the closest DNS root server; those resolvers may have difficulty getting responses from the root servers, such as during a network attack. Some DNS recursive resolver operators want to prevent snooping by third parties of requests sent to DNS root servers. In both cases, resolvers can greatly decrease the round-trip time and prevent observation of requests by serving a copy of the full root zone on the same server, such as on a loopback address or in the resolver software. This document shows how to start and maintain such a copy of the root zone that does not cause problems for other users of the DNS, at the cost of adding some operational fragility for the operator. This document obsoletes RFC 7706. This document is a product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon Jun 22 21:28:51 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378273A1740 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:28:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H7F3HN2amgIw for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:28:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF7683A1728 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:28:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840BFF40799; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:28:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 83D64F40792; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:28:36 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200623042836.83D64F40792@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8764_on_Apple=27s_DNS_Long-Lived_Querie?= =?utf-8?q?s_Protocol?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8764 Title: Apple's DNS Long-Lived Queries Protocol Author: S. Cheshire, M. Krochmal Status: Informational Stream: Independent Date: June 2020 Mailbox: cheshire@apple.com, marc@apple.com Pages: 20 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-sekar-dns-llq-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8764 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8764 Apple's DNS Long-Lived Queries (LLQ) is a mechanism for extending the DNS protocol to support change notification, thus allowing clients to learn about changes to DNS data without polling the server. From 2005 onwards, LLQ was implemented in Apple products including Mac OS X, Bonjour for Windows, and AirPort wireless base stations. In 2020, the LLQ protocol was superseded by the IETF Standards Track RFC 8765, "DNS Push Notifications", which builds on experience gained with the LLQ protocol to create a superior replacement. The existing LLQ protocol deployed and used from 2005 to 2020 is documented here to give background regarding the operational experience that informed the development of DNS Push Notifications, and to help facilitate a smooth transition from LLQ to DNS Push Notifications. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon Jun 22 21:29:58 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E7A3A1755 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:29:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rppBq1c8Tl3J for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76F253A17BD for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAABF4079A; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:29:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 27D0AF407A2; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:29:12 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200623042912.27D0AF407A2@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:29:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8765_on_DNS_Push_Notifications?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dnssd@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8765 Title: DNS Push Notifications Author: T. Pusateri, S. Cheshire Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: June 2020 Mailbox: pusateri@bangj.com, cheshire@apple.com Pages: 32 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dnssd-push-25.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8765 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8765 The Domain Name System (DNS) was designed to return matching records efficiently for queries for data that are relatively static. When those records change frequently, DNS is still efficient at returning the updated results when polled, as long as the polling rate is not too high. But, there exists no mechanism for a client to be asynchronously notified when these changes occur. This document defines a mechanism for a client to be notified of such changes to DNS records, called DNS Push Notifications. This document is a product of the Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon Jun 22 21:30:23 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7F73A199E for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:30:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HZIOuz-0PH9S for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5C433A18D9 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:29:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14839F407A8; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:29:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6B959F407A7; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:29:35 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200623042935.6B959F407A7@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 21:29:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8766_on_Discovery_Proxy_for_Multicast_D?= =?utf-8?q?NS-Based_Service_Discovery?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dnssd@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8766 Title: Discovery Proxy for Multicast DNS-Based Service Discovery Author: S. Cheshire Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: June 2020 Mailbox: cheshire@apple.com Pages: 33 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid-10.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8766 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8766 This document specifies a network proxy that uses Multicast DNS to automatically populate the wide-area unicast Domain Name System namespace with records describing devices and services found on the local link. This document is a product of the Extensions for Scalable DNS Service Discovery Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Jun 25 11:16:51 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F753A0DA6 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:16:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZGMm5Ft7-cLo for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 115873A0E0A for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19DFF40710; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:16:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 588E2F4070F; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:16:34 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200625181634.588E2F4070F@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8797_on_Remote_Direct_Memory_Access_-_C?= =?utf-8?q?onnection_Manager_=28RDMA-CM=29_Private_Data_for_RPC-over-RDMA_?= =?utf-8?q?Version_1?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8797 Title: Remote Direct Memory Access - Connection Manager (RDMA-CM) Private Data for RPC-over-RDMA Version 1 Author: C. Lever Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: June 2020 Mailbox: chuck.lever@oracle.com Pages: 12 Updates: RFC 8166 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-cm-pvt-data-08.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8797 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8797 This document specifies the format of Remote Direct Memory Access - Connection Manager (RDMA-CM) Private Data exchanged between RPC-over-RDMA version 1 peers as part of establishing a connection. The addition of the Private Data payload specified in this document is an optional extension that does not alter the RPC-over-RDMA version 1 protocol. This document updates RFC 8166. This document is a product of the Network File System Version 4 Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Jun 25 11:18:27 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446A63A0E91 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:18:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8PP4nUgeu3V for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF0803A0EA7 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D38AF4070F; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:18:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1E1DEF4070D; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:18:11 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200625181811.1E1DEF4070D@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8798_on_Additional_Units_for_Sensor_Mea?= =?utf-8?q?surement_Lists_=28SenML=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, core@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8798 Title: Additional Units for Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML) Author: C. Bormann Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: June 2020 Mailbox: cabo@tzi.org Pages: 9 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8798 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8798 The Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML) media type supports the indication of units for a quantity represented. This short document registers a number of additional unit names in the IANA registry for units in SenML. It also defines a registry for secondary units that cannot be in SenML's main registry, as they are derived by linear transformation from units already in that registry. This document is a product of the Constrained RESTful Environments Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon Jun 29 10:08:40 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C45C3A081C for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:08:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id scmT6cl1JmKC for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DD933A081D for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEFEF40740; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:08:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 72142F40737; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:08:19 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200629170819.72142F40737@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8785_on_JSON_Canonicalization_Scheme_?= =?utf-8?b?KEpDUyk=?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8785 Title: JSON Canonicalization Scheme (JCS) Author: A. Rundgren, B. Jordan, S. Erdtman Status: Informational Stream: Independent Date: June 2020 Mailbox: anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com, bret.jordan@broadcom.com, erdtman@spotify.com Pages: 20 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-rundgren-json-canonicalization-scheme-17.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8785 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8785 Cryptographic operations like hashing and signing need the data to be expressed in an invariant format so that the operations are reliably repeatable. One way to address this is to create a canonical representation of the data. Canonicalization also permits data to be exchanged in its original form on the "wire" while cryptographic operations performed on the canonicalized counterpart of the data in the producer and consumer endpoints generate consistent results. This document describes the JSON Canonicalization Scheme (JCS). This specification defines how to create a canonical representation of JSON data by building on the strict serialization methods for JSON primitives defined by ECMAScript, constraining JSON data to the Internet JSON (I-JSON) subset, and by using deterministic property sorting. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon Jun 29 10:09:16 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C353A0861 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:09:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M40L40_X-Lhx for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F252D3A089B for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:09:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C848F40756; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:08:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 071B2F40755; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:08:55 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200629170855.071B2F40755@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:08:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8792_on_Handling_Long_Lines_in_Content_?= =?utf-8?q?of_Internet-Drafts_and_RFCs?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8792 Title: Handling Long Lines in Content of Internet-Drafts and RFCs Author: K. Watsen, E. Auerswald, A. Farrel, Q. Wu Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: June 2020 Mailbox: kent+ietf@watsen.net, auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de, adrian@olddog.co.uk, bill.wu@huawei.com Pages: 28 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-12.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8792 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8792 This document defines two strategies for handling long lines in width-bounded text content. One strategy, called the "single backslash" strategy, is based on the historical use of a single backslash ('') character to indicate where line-folding has occurred, with the continuation occurring with the first character that is not a space character (' ') on the next line. The second strategy, called the "double backslash" strategy, extends the first strategy by adding a second backslash character to identify where the continuation begins and is thereby able to handle cases not supported by the first strategy. Both strategies use a self-describing header enabling automated reconstitution of the original content. This document is a product of the Network Modeling Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Jun 30 14:49:20 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EA93A085A for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:49:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J0mahVZg5G6J for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB4443A088F for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2296BF4075A; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:48:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 72E6EF40757; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:48:57 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200630214857.72E6EF40757@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8784_on_Mixing_Preshared_Keys_in_the_In?= =?utf-8?q?ternet_Key_Exchange_Protocol_Version_2_=28IKEv2=29_for_Post-qua?= =?utf-8?q?ntum_Security?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ipsec@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8784 Title: Mixing Preshared Keys in the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) for Post-quantum Security Author: S. Fluhrer, P. Kampanakis, D. McGrew, V. Smyslov Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: June 2020 Mailbox: sfluhrer@cisco.com, pkampana@cisco.com, mcgrew@cisco.com, svan@elvis.ru Pages: 16 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8784 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8784 The possibility of quantum computers poses a serious challenge to cryptographic algorithms deployed widely today. The Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) is one example of a cryptosystem that could be broken; someone storing VPN communications today could decrypt them at a later time when a quantum computer is available. It is anticipated that IKEv2 will be extended to support quantum-secure key exchange algorithms; however, that is not likely to happen in the near term. To address this problem before then, this document describes an extension of IKEv2 to allow it to be resistant to a quantum computer by using preshared keys. This document is a product of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Jun 30 14:50:01 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C97C3A0922 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:50:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t_UrkemEiMdY for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A07FB3A08F9 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7110DF40761; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:49:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7E28CF4075B; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:49:37 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200630214937.7E28CF4075B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:49:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8790_on_FETCH_and_PATCH_with_Sensor_Mea?= =?utf-8?q?surement_Lists_=28SenML=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, core@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" QSBuZXcgUmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgQ29tbWVudHMgaXMgbm93IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBpbiBvbmxpbmUgUkZD IGxpYnJhcmllcy4KCiAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgUkZDIDg3OTAKCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGU6ICAg ICAgRkVUQ0ggYW5kIFBBVENIIHdpdGggU2Vuc29yIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIE1lYXN1 cmVtZW50IExpc3RzIChTZW5NTCkgCiAgICAgICAgQXV0aG9yOiAgICAgQS4gS2Vyw6RuZW4sCiAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgTS4gTW9oYWplcgogICAgICAgIFN0YXR1czogICAgIFN0YW5kYXJk cyBUcmFjawogICAgICAgIFN0cmVhbTogICAgIElFVEYKICAgICAgICBEYXRlOiAgICAgICBKdW5l IDIwMjAKICAgICAgICBNYWlsYm94OiAgICBhcmkua2VyYW5lbkBlcmljc3Nvbi5jb20sIAogICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIG1vamFubUBob3RtYWlsLmNvbQogICAgICAgIFBhZ2VzOiAgICAgIDEx CiAgICAgICAgVXBkYXRlcy9PYnNvbGV0ZXMvU2VlQWxzbzogICBOb25lCgogICAgICAgIEktRCBU YWc6ICAgIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtY29yZS1zZW5tbC1ldGNoLTA3LnR4dAoKICAgICAgICBVUkw6ICAg ICAgICBodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy9pbmZvL3JmYzg3OTAKCiAgICAgICAgRE9J OiAgICAgICAgMTAuMTc0ODcvUkZDODc5MAoKVGhlIFNlbnNvciBNZWFzdXJlbWVudCBMaXN0cyAo U2VuTUwpIG1lZGlhIHR5cGUgYW5kIGRhdGEgbW9kZWwgY2FuIGJlCnVzZWQgdG8gc2VuZCBjb2xs ZWN0aW9ucyBvZiByZXNvdXJjZXMsIHN1Y2ggYXMgYmF0Y2hlcyBvZiBzZW5zb3IgZGF0YQpvciBj b25maWd1cmF0aW9uIHBhcmFtZXRlcnMuIFRoZSBDb25zdHJhaW5lZCBBcHBsaWNhdGlvbiBQcm90 b2NvbAooQ29BUCkgRkVUQ0gsIFBBVENILCBhbmQgaVBBVENIIG1ldGhvZHMgZW5hYmxlIGFjY2Vz c2luZyBhbmQgdXBkYXRpbmcKcGFydHMgb2YgYSByZXNvdXJjZSBvciBtdWx0aXBsZSByZXNvdXJj ZXMgd2l0aCBvbmUgcmVxdWVzdC4gVGhpcwpkb2N1bWVudCBkZWZpbmVzIG5ldyBtZWRpYSB0eXBl cyBmb3IgdGhlIENvQVAgRkVUQ0gsIFBBVENILCBhbmQKaVBBVENIIG1ldGhvZHMgZm9yIHJlc291 cmNlcyByZXByZXNlbnRlZCB1c2luZyB0aGUgU2VuTUwgZGF0YSBtb2RlbC4KClRoaXMgZG9jdW1l bnQgaXMgYSBwcm9kdWN0IG9mIHRoZSBDb25zdHJhaW5lZCBSRVNUZnVsIEVudmlyb25tZW50cyBX b3JraW5nIEdyb3VwIG9mIHRoZSBJRVRGLgoKVGhpcyBpcyBub3cgYSBQcm9wb3NlZCBTdGFuZGFy ZC4KClNUQU5EQVJEUyBUUkFDSzogVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBzcGVjaWZpZXMgYW4gSW50ZXJuZXQg U3RhbmRhcmRzIFRyYWNrCnByb3RvY29sIGZvciB0aGUgSW50ZXJuZXQgY29tbXVuaXR5LCBhbmQg cmVxdWVzdHMgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiBhbmQgc3VnZ2VzdGlvbnMKZm9yIGltcHJvdmVtZW50cy4gIFBs ZWFzZSByZWZlciB0byB0aGUgY3VycmVudCBlZGl0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBPZmZpY2lhbApJbnRlcm5l dCBQcm90b2NvbCBTdGFuZGFyZHMgKGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL3N0YW5kYXJk cykgZm9yIHRoZSAKc3RhbmRhcmRpemF0aW9uIHN0YXRlIGFuZCBzdGF0dXMgb2YgdGhpcyBwcm90 b2NvbC4gIERpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbiBvZiB0aGlzIAptZW1vIGlzIHVubGltaXRlZC4KClRoaXMgYW5u b3VuY2VtZW50IGlzIHNlbnQgdG8gdGhlIElFVEYtQW5ub3VuY2UgYW5kIHJmYy1kaXN0IGxpc3Rz LgpUbyBzdWJzY3JpYmUgb3IgdW5zdWJzY3JpYmUsIHNlZQogIGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3Jn L21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vaWV0Zi1hbm5vdW5jZQogIGh0dHBzOi8vbWFpbG1hbi5yZmMtZWRp dG9yLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3JmYy1kaXN0CgpGb3Igc2VhcmNoaW5nIHRoZSBSRkMg c2VyaWVzLCBzZWUgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvc2VhcmNoCkZvciBkb3dubG9h ZGluZyBSRkNzLCBzZWUgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvcmV0cmlldmUvYnVsawoK UmVxdWVzdHMgZm9yIHNwZWNpYWwgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIHNob3VsZCBiZSBhZGRyZXNzZWQgdG8g ZWl0aGVyIHRoZQphdXRob3Igb2YgdGhlIFJGQyBpbiBxdWVzdGlvbiwgb3IgdG8gcmZjLWVkaXRv ckByZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZy4gIFVubGVzcwpzcGVjaWZpY2FsbHkgbm90ZWQgb3RoZXJ3aXNlIG9u IHRoZSBSRkMgaXRzZWxmLCBhbGwgUkZDcyBhcmUgZm9yCnVubGltaXRlZCBkaXN0cmlidXRpb24u CgoKVGhlIFJGQyBFZGl0b3IgVGVhbQpBc3NvY2lhdGlvbiBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IFNvbHV0aW9ucywg TExDCgoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KcmZj LWRpc3QgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0CnJmYy1kaXN0QHJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJm Yy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcmZjLWRpc3QKaHR0cDovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRp dG9yLm9yZwo= From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Tue Jun 30 14:58:56 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E493A0895 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:58:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YH-kO0D3hd02 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D113A08A5 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52969F4075A; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:58:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3A8F7F40754; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:58:34 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20200630215834.3A8F7F40754@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 14:58:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?BCP_190=2C_RFC_8820_on_URI_Design_and_Owner?= =?utf-8?q?ship?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 190 RFC 8820 Title: URI Design and Ownership Author: M. Nottingham Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: June 2020 Mailbox: mnot@mnot.net Pages: 8 Obsoletes: RFC 7320 Updates: RFC 3986 See Also: BCP 190 I-D Tag: draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-03.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8820 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8820 Section 1.1.1 of RFC 3986 defines URI syntax as "a federated and extensible naming system wherein each scheme's specification may further restrict the syntax and semantics of identifiers using that scheme." In other words, the structure of a URI is defined by its scheme. While it is common for schemes to further delegate their substructure to the URI's owner, publishing independent standards that mandate particular forms of substructure in URIs is often problematic. This document provides guidance on the specification of URI substructure in standards. This document obsoletes RFC 7320 and updates RFC 3986. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org