
From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jul 14 16:24:25 2020
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6B63A00B0 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u06yhA2oJudb for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E73823A0645 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D77F40745; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E3AF8F40743; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20200714232419.E3AF8F40743@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8796_on_RSVP-TE_Summary_Fast_Reroute_Ex?= =?utf-8?q?tensions_for_Label_Switched_Path_=28LSP=29_Tunnels?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, mpls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8796

        Title:      RSVP-TE Summary Fast Reroute Extensions 
                    for Label Switched Path (LSP) Tunnels 
        Author:     M. Taillon,
                    T. Saad, Ed., 
                    R. Gandhi,
                    A. Deshmukh, 
                    M. Jork,
                    V. Beeram
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       July 2020
        Mailbox:    mtaillon@cisco.com, 
                    tsaad@juniper.net, 
                    rgandhi@cisco.com,
                    adeshmukh@juniper.net, 
                    mjork@128technology.com,
                    vbeeram@juniper.net
        Pages:      18
        Updates:    RFC 4090

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-mpls-summary-frr-rsvpte-09.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8796

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8796

This document updates RFC 4090 for the Resource Reservation Protocol
(RSVP) Traffic Engineering (TE) procedures defined for facility
backup protection. The updates include extensions that reduce the
amount of signaling and processing that occurs during Fast Reroute
(FRR); as a result, scalability when undergoing FRR convergence after
a link or node failure is improved. These extensions allow the RSVP
message exchange between the Point of Local Repair (PLR) and the
Merge Point (MP) nodes to be independent of the number of protected
Label Switched Paths (LSPs) traversing between them when facility
bypass FRR protection is used. The signaling extensions are fully
backwards compatible with nodes that do not support them.

This document is a product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Wed Jul 15 09:58:08 2020
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448A73A08F4 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qg_JFeVD1CFB for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C87DD3A0940 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FB1F40769; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6E49FF40768; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20200715165800.6E49FF40768@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8799_on_Limited_Domains_and_Internet_Pr?= =?utf-8?q?otocols?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8799

        Title:      Limited Domains and Internet Protocols 
        Author:     B. Carpenter,
                    B. Liu
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     Independent
        Date:       July 2020
        Mailbox:    brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com, 
                    leo.liubing@huawei.com
        Pages:      23
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-carpenter-limited-domains-13.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8799

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8799

There is a noticeable trend towards network behaviors and semantics
that are specific to a particular set of requirements applied within
a limited region of the Internet. Policies, default parameters, the
options supported, the style of network management, and security
requirements may vary between such limited regions. This document
reviews examples of such limited domains (also known as controlled
environments), notes emerging solutions, and includes a related
taxonomy. It then briefly discusses the standardization of protocols
for limited domains. Finally, it shows the need for a precise
definition of "limited domain membership" and for mechanisms to allow
nodes to join a domain securely and to find other members, including
boundary nodes. 

This document is the product of the research of the authors. It has
been produced through discussions and consultation within the IETF
but is not the product of IETF consensus.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jul 21 16:51:51 2020
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E233A0840 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PVp0kR9TqkgU for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E37B93A0843 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC76F40759; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6F3C4F40758; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20200721235134.6F3C4F40758@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8779_on_Path_Computation_Element_Commun?= =?utf-8?q?ication_Protocol_=28PCEP=29_Extensions_for_GMPLS?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8779

        Title:      Path Computation Element Communication Protocol 
                    (PCEP) Extensions for GMPLS 
        Author:     C. Margaria, Ed.,
                    O. Gonzalez de Dios, Ed.,
                    F. Zhang, Ed.
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       July 2020
        Mailbox:    cmargaria@juniper.net, 
                    oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com, 
                    zhangfatai@huawei.com
        Pages:      38
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-16.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8779

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8779

A Path Computation Element (PCE) provides path computation functions
for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS)
networks. Additional requirements for GMPLS are identified in RFC
7025. 

This memo provides extensions to the Path Computation Element
Communication Protocol (PCEP) for the support of the GMPLS control
plane to address those requirements.

This document is a product of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jul 21 16:52:16 2020
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682813A0975 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pjVLwX5KTER3 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24CE53A091D for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B564F40763; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9579FF40761; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20200721235154.9579FF40761@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8780_on_The_Path_Computation_Element_Co?= =?utf-8?q?mmunication_Protocol_=28PCEP=29_Extension_for_Wavelength_Switch?= =?utf-8?q?ed_Optical_Network_=28WSON=29_Routing_and_Wavelength_Assignment?= =?utf-8?b?IChSV0Ep?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8780

        Title:      The Path Computation Element Communication 
                    Protocol (PCEP) Extension for Wavelength Switched 
                    Optical Network (WSON) Routing and Wavelength 
                    Assignment (RWA) 
        Author:     Y. Lee, Ed.,
                    R. Casellas, Ed.
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       July 2020
        Mailbox:    younglee.tx@gmail.com, 
                    ramon.casellas@cttc.es
        Pages:      26
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-17.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8780

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8780

This document provides Path Computation Element Communication
Protocol (PCEP) extensions for the support of Routing and Wavelength
Assignment (RWA) in Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSONs).
Path provisioning in WSONs requires an RWA process.  From a path
computation perspective, wavelength assignment is the process of
determining which wavelength can be used on each hop of a path and
forms an additional routing constraint to optical path computation.

This document is a product of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Wed Jul 22 11:13:16 2020
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E0D3A0908 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58t8JrvqIkJ3 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FAD53A0916 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFD1F4075D; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C987EF40757; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20200722181257.C987EF40757@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8794_on_Extensible_Binary_Meta_Language?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, cellar@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8794

        Title:      Extensible Binary Meta Language 
        Author:     S. Lhomme,
                    D. Rice,
                    M. Bunkus
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       July 2020
        Mailbox:    slhomme@matroska.org, 
                    dave@dericed.com, 
                    moritz@bunkus.org
        Pages:      51
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-cellar-ebml-17.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8794

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8794

This document defines the Extensible Binary Meta Language (EBML)
format as a binary container format designed for audio/video storage.
EBML is designed as a binary equivalent to XML and uses a
storage-efficient approach to build nested Elements with identifiers,
lengths, and values. Similar to how an XML Schema defines the
structure and semantics of an XML Document, this document defines how
EBML Schemas are created to convey the semantics of an EBML Document.

This document is a product of the Codec Encoding for LossLess Archiving and Realtime transmission Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jul 28 14:57:42 2020
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150753A09D7 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t1ysJQuq_GVq for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3BD03A09D9 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A373DF4073A; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2C3B6F40727; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20200728215713.2C3B6F40727@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 14:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8744_on_Issues_and_Requirements_for_Ser?= =?utf-8?q?ver_Name_Identification_=28SNI=29_Encryption_in_TLS?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8744

        Title:      Issues and Requirements for Server 
                    Name Identification (SNI) Encryption in TLS 
        Author:     C. Huitema
        Status:     Informational
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       July 2020
        Mailbox:    huitema@huitema.net
        Pages:      13
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-tls-sni-encryption-09.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8744

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8744

This document describes the general problem of encrypting the Server
Name Identification (SNI) TLS parameter. The proposed solutions hide
a hidden service behind a fronting service, only disclosing the SNI
of the fronting service to external observers. This document lists
known attacks against SNI encryption, discusses the current "HTTP
co-tenancy" solution, and presents requirements for future TLS-layer
solutions. 

In practice, it may well be that no solution can meet every
requirement and that practical solutions will have to make some
compromises.

This document is a product of the Transport Layer Security Working Group of the IETF.


INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community.
It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jul 28 15:53:07 2020
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FCD3A0A35 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r5M1TGCut21U for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E127E3A09AB for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E23F4073D; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7A48DF4073A; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20200728225238.7A48DF4073A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8800_on_Path_Computation_Element_Commun?= =?utf-8?q?ication_Protocol_=28PCEP=29_Extension_for_Label_Switched_Path_?= =?utf-8?q?=28LSP=29_Diversity_Constraint_Signaling?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8800

        Title:      Path Computation Element Communication Protocol 
                    (PCEP) Extension for Label Switched Path 
                    (LSP) Diversity Constraint Signaling 
        Author:     S. Litkowski,
                    S. Sivabalan,
                    C. Barth,
                    M. Negi
        Status:     Standards Track
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       July 2020
        Mailbox:    slitkows.ietf@gmail.com, 
                    msiva282@gmail.com, 
                    cbarth@juniper.net,
                    mahend.ietf@gmail.com
        Pages:      21
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-15.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8800

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8800

This document introduces a simple mechanism to associate a group of
Label Switched Paths (LSPs) via an extension to the Path Computation
Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) with the purpose of computing
diverse (disjointed) paths for those LSPs.  The proposed extension
allows a Path Computation Client (PCC) to advertise to a Path
Computation Element (PCE) that a particular LSP belongs to a
particular Disjoint Association Group; thus, the PCE knows that the
LSPs in the same group need to be disjoint from each other.

This document is a product of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Tue Jul 28 16:22:06 2020
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30253A0AAC for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ZmXI2t_F8iH for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 451443A0A9A for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17318F4074E; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id BB4F7F4073D; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20200728232137.BB4F7F4073D@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8803_on_0-RTT_TCP_Convert_Protocol?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, tcpm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        
        RFC 8803

        Title:      0-RTT TCP Convert Protocol 
        Author:     O. Bonaventure, Ed.,
                    M. Boucadair, Ed.,
                    S. Gundavelli,
                    S. Seo,
                    B. Hesmans
        Status:     Experimental
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       July 2020
        Mailbox:    Olivier.Bonaventure@tessares.net, 
                    mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, 
                    sgundave@cisco.com,
                    sh.seo@kt.com, 
                    Benjamin.Hesmans@tessares.net
        Pages:      47
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-tcpm-converters-19.txt

        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8803

        DOI:        10.17487/RFC8803

This document specifies an application proxy, called Transport
Converter, to assist the deployment of TCP extensions such as
Multipath TCP. A Transport Converter may provide conversion service
for one or more TCP extensions. The conversion service is provided by
means of the 0-RTT TCP Convert Protocol (Convert).

This protocol provides 0-RTT (Zero Round-Trip Time) conversion
service since no extra delay is induced by the protocol compared to
connections that are not proxied. Also, the Convert Protocol does not
require any encapsulation (no tunnels whatsoever).

This specification assumes an explicit model, where the Transport
Converter is explicitly configured on hosts. As a sample
applicability use case, this document specifies how the Convert
Protocol applies for Multipath TCP.

This document is a product of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group of the IETF.


EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the
Internet community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any
kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC
_______________________________________________
rfc-dist mailing list
rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
http://www.rfc-editor.org

From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Wed Jul 29 05:42:41 2020
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9DE3A0A73 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 05:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8jvLj9L8U9cO for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 05:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F304F3A0A78 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 05:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B13F40741; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 05:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 94FF1F4071F; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 05:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20200729124211.94FF1F4071F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 05:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8801_on_Discovering_Provisioning_Domain?= =?utf-8?q?_Names_and_Data?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, int-area@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
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From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org  Wed Jul 29 06:51:34 2020
Return-Path: <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D9B3A0B36 for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3sBpLSVIxdcV for <ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BB2B3A0B39 for <rfc-dist-archive-yuw6Xa6hiena@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAD7F4071F; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5A405F4071D; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Message-Id: <20200729135105.5A405F4071D@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8802_on_The_Quality_for_Service_=28Q4S?= =?utf-8?q?=29_Protocol?=
X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Announcements <rfc-dist.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-dist/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist>, <mailto:rfc-dist-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: "rfc-dist" <rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
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