From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Oct 9 15:08:16 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6496C3A15BF for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:08:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rObS1R_ngsMY for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B0543A1597 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97302F406CA; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:07:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 41A1DF406C9; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:07:57 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201009220757.41A1DF406C9@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:07:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8885_on_Proxy_Mobile_IPv6_Extensions_fo?= =?utf-8?q?r_Distributed_Mobility_Management?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dmm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" QSBuZXcgUmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgQ29tbWVudHMgaXMgbm93IGF2YWlsYWJsZSBpbiBvbmxpbmUgUkZD IGxpYnJhcmllcy4KCiAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgUkZDIDg4ODUKCiAgICAgICAgVGl0bGU6ICAg ICAgUHJveHkgTW9iaWxlIElQdjYgRXh0ZW5zaW9ucyBmb3IgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg RGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgTW9iaWxpdHkgTWFuYWdlbWVudCAKICAgICAgICBBdXRob3I6ICAgICBDSi4g QmVybmFyZG9zLAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEEuIGRlIGxhIE9saXZhLAogICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgIEYuIEdpdXN0LAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIEpDLiBaw7rDsWlnYSwKICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBBLiBNb3VyYWQKICAgICAgICBTdGF0dXM6ICAgICBFeHBlcmltZW50 YWwKICAgICAgICBTdHJlYW06ICAgICBJRVRGCiAgICAgICAgRGF0ZTogICAgICAgT2N0b2JlciAy MDIwCiAgICAgICAgTWFpbGJveDogICAgY2piY0BpdC51YzNtLmVzLCAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICBhb2xpdmFAaXQudWMzbS5lcywgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgZmFiaW8uZ2l1c3Qu cmVzZWFyY2hAZ21haWwuY29tLAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGouYy56dW5pZ2FAaWVlZS5v cmcsIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGFsYWluLm1vdXJhZEBpbnRlcmRpZ2l0YWwuY29tCiAg ICAgICAgUGFnZXM6ICAgICAgMjUKICAgICAgICBVcGRhdGVzL09ic29sZXRlcy9TZWVBbHNvOiAg IE5vbmUKCiAgICAgICAgSS1EIFRhZzogICAgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1kbW0tcG1pcHY2LWRsaWYtMDYu dHh0CgogICAgICAgIFVSTDogICAgICAgIGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL2luZm8v cmZjODg4NQoKICAgICAgICBET0k6ICAgICAgICAxMC4xNzQ4Ny9SRkM4ODg1CgpEaXN0cmlidXRl ZCBNb2JpbGl0eSBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IHNvbHV0aW9ucyBhbGxvdyBuZXR3b3JrcyB0byBiZSBzZXQg dXAKaW4gc3VjaCBhIHdheSB0aGF0IHRyYWZmaWMgaXMgZGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgb3B0aW1hbGx5IGFu ZCBjZW50cmFsbHkKZGVwbG95ZWQgYW5jaG9ycyBhcmUgbm90IHJlbGllZCB1cG9uIHRvIHByb3Zp ZGUgSVAgbW9iaWxpdHkgc3VwcG9ydC4gCgpUaGVyZSBhcmUgbWFueSBkaWZmZXJlbnQgYXBwcm9h Y2hlcyB0byBhZGRyZXNzIERpc3RyaWJ1dGVkIE1vYmlsaXR5Ck1hbmFnZW1lbnQgLS0gZm9yIGV4 YW1wbGUsIGV4dGVuZGluZyBuZXR3b3JrLWJhc2VkIG1vYmlsaXR5IHByb3RvY29scwoobGlrZSBQ cm94eSBNb2JpbGUgSVB2Nikgb3IgY2xpZW50LWJhc2VkIG1vYmlsaXR5IHByb3RvY29scyAobGlr ZQpNb2JpbGUgSVB2NiksIGFtb25nIG90aGVycy4gVGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBmb2xsb3dzIHRoZSBm b3JtZXIgYXBwcm9hY2gKYW5kIHByb3Bvc2VzIGEgc29sdXRpb24gYmFzZWQgb24gUHJveHkgTW9i aWxlIElQdjYsIGluIHdoaWNoIG1vYmlsaXR5CnNlc3Npb25zIGFyZSBhbmNob3JlZCBhdCB0aGUg bGFzdCBJUCBob3Agcm91dGVyIChjYWxsZWQgdGhlIG1vYmlsaXR5CmFuY2hvciBhbmQgYWNjZXNz IHJvdXRlcikuIFRoZSBtb2JpbGl0eSBhbmNob3IgYW5kIGFjY2VzcyByb3V0ZXIgaXMKYW4gZW5o YW5jZWQgYWNjZXNzIHJvdXRlciB0aGF0IGlzIGFsc28gYWJsZSB0byBvcGVyYXRlIGFzIGEgbG9j YWwKbW9iaWxpdHkgYW5jaG9yIG9yIG1vYmlsaXR5IGFjY2VzcyBnYXRld2F5IG9uIGEgcGVyLXBy ZWZpeCBiYXNpcy4gVGhlCmRvY3VtZW50IGZvY3VzZXMgb24gdGhlIHJlcXVpcmVkIGV4dGVuc2lv bnMgdG8gZWZmZWN0aXZlbHkgc3VwcG9ydAp0aGUgc2ltdWx0YW5lb3VzIGFuY2hvcmluZyBzZXZl cmFsIGZsb3dzIGF0IGRpZmZlcmVudCBkaXN0cmlidXRlZApnYXRld2F5cy4KClRoaXMgZG9jdW1l bnQgaXMgYSBwcm9kdWN0IG9mIHRoZSBEaXN0cmlidXRlZCBNb2JpbGl0eSBNYW5hZ2VtZW50IFdv cmtpbmcgR3JvdXAgb2YgdGhlIElFVEYuCgoKRVhQRVJJTUVOVEFMOiBUaGlzIG1lbW8gZGVmaW5l cyBhbiBFeHBlcmltZW50YWwgUHJvdG9jb2wgZm9yIHRoZQpJbnRlcm5ldCBjb21tdW5pdHkuICBJ dCBkb2VzIG5vdCBzcGVjaWZ5IGFuIEludGVybmV0IHN0YW5kYXJkIG9mIGFueQpraW5kLiBEaXNj dXNzaW9uIGFuZCBzdWdnZXN0aW9ucyBmb3IgaW1wcm92ZW1lbnQgYXJlIHJlcXVlc3RlZC4KRGlz dHJpYnV0aW9uIG9mIHRoaXMgbWVtbyBpcyB1bmxpbWl0ZWQuCgpUaGlzIGFubm91bmNlbWVudCBp cyBzZW50IHRvIHRoZSBJRVRGLUFubm91bmNlIGFuZCByZmMtZGlzdCBsaXN0cy4KVG8gc3Vic2Ny aWJlIG9yIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlLCBzZWUKICBodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xp c3RpbmZvL2lldGYtYW5ub3VuY2UKICBodHRwczovL21haWxtYW4ucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcvbWFp bG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9yZmMtZGlzdAoKRm9yIHNlYXJjaGluZyB0aGUgUkZDIHNlcmllcywgc2Vl IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL3NlYXJjaApGb3IgZG93bmxvYWRpbmcgUkZDcywg c2VlIGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL3JldHJpZXZlL2J1bGsKClJlcXVlc3RzIGZv ciBzcGVjaWFsIGRpc3RyaWJ1dGlvbiBzaG91bGQgYmUgYWRkcmVzc2VkIHRvIGVpdGhlciB0aGUK YXV0aG9yIG9mIHRoZSBSRkMgaW4gcXVlc3Rpb24sIG9yIHRvIHJmYy1lZGl0b3JAcmZjLWVkaXRv ci5vcmcuICBVbmxlc3MKc3BlY2lmaWNhbGx5IG5vdGVkIG90aGVyd2lzZSBvbiB0aGUgUkZDIGl0 c2VsZiwgYWxsIFJGQ3MgYXJlIGZvcgp1bmxpbWl0ZWQgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uLgoKClRoZSBSRkMg RWRpdG9yIFRlYW0KQXNzb2NpYXRpb24gTWFuYWdlbWVudCBTb2x1dGlvbnMsIExMQwoKCl9fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCnJmYy1kaXN0IG1haWxp bmcgbGlzdApyZmMtZGlzdEByZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9yZwpodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZmMtZWRpdG9yLm9y Zy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3JmYy1kaXN0Cmh0dHA6Ly93d3cucmZjLWVkaXRvci5vcmcK From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Oct 9 15:28:26 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8C43A1569 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:28:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BF4wrlSaaYDu for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14B903A0EDB for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57881F406D8; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:28:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 659F8F406D5; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:28:09 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201009222809.659F8F406D5@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8933_on_Update_to_the_Cryptographic_Mes?= =?utf-8?q?sage_Syntax_=28CMS=29_for_Algorithm_Identifier_Protection?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: spasm@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8933 Title: Update to the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) for Algorithm Identifier Protection Author: R. Housley Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: housley@vigilsec.com Pages: 8 Updates: RFC 5652 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-update-alg-id-protect-05.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8933 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8933 This document updates the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) specified in RFC 5652 to ensure that algorithm identifiers in signed-data and authenticated-data content types are adequately protected. This document is a product of the Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX and SMIME Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Oct 9 16:47:41 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0736E3A1649 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:47:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gKNFY_9LjYp2 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C22343A1640 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:47:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7D3F406C3; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:47:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id DD8D1F406C3; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:47:20 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201009234720.DD8D1F406C3@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8924_on_Service_Function_Chaining_=28SF?= =?utf-8?q?C=29_Operations=2C_Administration=2C_and_Maintenance_=28OAM=29_?= =?utf-8?q?Framework?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, sfc@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8924 Title: Service Function Chaining (SFC) Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Framework Author: S. Aldrin, C. Pignataro, Ed., N. Kumar, Ed., R. Krishnan, A. Ghanwani Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: aldrin.ietf@gmail.com, cpignata@cisco.com, naikumar@cisco.com, ramkri123@gmail.com, anoop@alumni.duke.edu Pages: 20 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-15.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8924 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8924 This document provides a reference framework for Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) for Service Function Chaining (SFC). This document is a product of the Service Function Chaining Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sat Oct 17 05:34:10 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0623A0AD8 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:34:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EtYspbux_gtJ for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:34:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAB663A0AE8 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:34:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C81F406F7; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:33:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7F563F406F4; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:33:43 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org, irtf-announce@irtf.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201017123343.7F563F406F4@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8937_on_Randomness_Improvements_for_Sec?= =?utf-8?q?urity_Protocols?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, cfrg@irtf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8937 Title: Randomness Improvements for Security Protocols Author: C. Cremers, L. Garratt, S. Smyshlyaev, N. Sullivan, C. Wood Status: Informational Stream: IRTF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: cremers@cispa.saarland, lgarratt@cisco.com, svs@cryptopro.ru, nick@cloudflare.com, caw@heapingbits.net Pages: 9 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-irtf-cfrg-randomness-improvements-14.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8937 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8937 Randomness is a crucial ingredient for Transport Layer Security (TLS) and related security protocols. Weak or predictable "cryptographically secure" pseudorandom number generators (CSPRNGs) can be abused or exploited for malicious purposes. An initial entropy source that seeds a CSPRNG might be weak or broken as well, which can also lead to critical and systemic security problems. This document describes a way for security protocol implementations to augment their CSPRNGs using long-term private keys. This improves randomness from broken or otherwise subverted CSPRNGs. This document is a product of the Crypto Forum Research Group (CFRG) in the IRTF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce, rfc-dist and IRTF-Announce lists.To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-announce For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sat Oct 17 05:53:25 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982C13A0B1D for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:53:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CI2VT3gA5pGH for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A55E3A0B1A for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E85F40712; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:53:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 02DF3F40710; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:53:00 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201017125300.02DF3F40710@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 05:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8925_on_IPv6-Only_Preferred_Option_for_?= =?utf-8?q?DHCPv4?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dhcwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8925 Title: IPv6-Only Preferred Option for DHCPv4 Author: L. Colitti, J. Linkova, M. Richardson, T. Mrugalski Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: lorenzo@google.com, furry@google.com, mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca, tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com Pages: 12 Updates: RFC 2563 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-08.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8925 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8925 This document specifies a DHCPv4 option to indicate that a host supports an IPv6-only mode and is willing to forgo obtaining an IPv4 address if the network provides IPv6 connectivity. It also updates RFC 2563 to specify DHCPv4 server behavior when the server receives a DHCPDISCOVER not containing the Auto-Configure option but containing the new option defined in this document. This document is a product of the Dynamic Host Configuration Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Mon Oct 19 12:48:26 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C653A083B for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:48:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oDUDImp0th_8 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C88B93A0855 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CC3F4071F; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:48:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3FA0CF4071E; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:48:20 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201019194820.3FA0CF4071E@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8818_on_Distributed_Mobility_Anchoring?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dmm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8818 Title: Distributed Mobility Anchoring Author: H. Chan, Ed., X. Wei, J. Lee, S. Jeon, CJ. Bernardos, Ed. Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: h.a.chan@ieee.org, weixinpeng@huawei.com, jonghyouk@sejong.ac.kr, seiljeon.ietf@gmail.com, cjbc@it.uc3m.es Pages: 18 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-15.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8818 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8818 This document defines distributed mobility anchoring in terms of the different configurations and functions to provide IP mobility support. A network may be configured with distributed mobility anchoring functions for both network-based or host-based mobility support, depending on the network's needs. In a distributed mobility anchoring environment, multiple anchors are available for mid-session switching of an IP prefix anchor. To start a new flow or to handle a flow not requiring IP session continuity as a mobile node moves to a new network, the flow can be started or restarted using an IP address configured from the new IP prefix anchored to the new network. If the flow needs to survive the change of network, there are solutions that can be used to enable IP address mobility. This document describes different anchoring approaches, depending on the IP mobility needs, and how this IP address mobility is handled by the network. This document is a product of the Distributed Mobility Management Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Oct 21 16:16:45 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BF33A0B86 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:16:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vaKnqG8qYPhH for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A37203A0B7D for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242B8F4071E; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:16:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 698A5F40719; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:16:34 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201021231634.698A5F40719@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8921_on_Dynamic_Service_Negotiation=3A_?= =?utf-8?q?The_Connectivity_Provisioning_Negotiation_Protocol_=28CPNP=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8921 Title: Dynamic Service Negotiation: The Connectivity Provisioning Negotiation Protocol (CPNP) Author: M. Boucadair, Ed., C. Jacquenet, D. Zhang, P. Georgatsos Status: Informational Stream: Independent Date: October 2020 Mailbox: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, christian.jacquenet@orange.com, dacheng.zhang@huawei.com, pgeorgat@gmail.com Pages: 49 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-boucadair-connectivity-provisioning-protocol-22.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8921 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8921 This document defines the Connectivity Provisioning Negotiation Protocol (CPNP), which is designed to facilitate the dynamic negotiation of service parameters. CPNP is a generic protocol that can be used for various negotiation purposes that include (but are not necessarily limited to) connectivity provisioning services, storage facilities, Content Delivery Networks, etc. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Oct 21 16:17:19 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593243A0EA7 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:17:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rOn7Gfhaqxp4 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562AE3A0C55 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696D8F4073D; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:17:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E380DF4073A; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:17:02 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201021231702.E380DF4073A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:17:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8922_on_A_Survey_of_the_Interaction_bet?= =?utf-8?q?ween_Security_Protocols_and_Transport_Services?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, taps@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8922 Title: A Survey of the Interaction between Security Protocols and Transport Services Author: T. Enghardt, T. Pauly, C. Perkins, K. Rose, C. Wood Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: ietf@tenghardt.net, tpauly@apple.com, csp@csperkins.org, krose@krose.org, caw@heapingbits.net Pages: 19 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-12.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8922 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8922 This document provides a survey of commonly used or notable network security protocols, with a focus on how they interact and integrate with applications and transport protocols. Its goal is to supplement efforts to define and catalog Transport Services by describing the interfaces required to add security protocols. This survey is not limited to protocols developed within the scope or context of the IETF, and those included represent a superset of features a Transport Services system may need to support. This document is a product of the Transport Services Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Wed Oct 21 16:17:40 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950393A0B86 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:17:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kOvYQIO57Tf4 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBDF03A0EB4 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD0BF4074B; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:17:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 87143F40745; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:17:08 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201021231708.87143F40745@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8923_on_A_Minimal_Set_of_Transport_Serv?= =?utf-8?q?ices_for_End_Systems?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, taps@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8923 Title: A Minimal Set of Transport Services for End Systems Author: M. Welzl, S. Gjessing Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: michawe@ifi.uio.no, steing@ifi.uio.no Pages: 44 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-taps-minset-11.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8923 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8923 This document recommends a minimal set of Transport Services offered by end systems and gives guidance on choosing among the available mechanisms and protocols. It is based on the set of transport features in RFC 8303. This document is a product of the Transport Services Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Oct 22 14:10:26 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB2A3A104E for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:10:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id moaDElMomaRe for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:10:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FE083A1050 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:10:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBEFF4071C; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:10:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6DA8AF4071A; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:10:18 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201022211018.6DA8AF4071A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:10:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8917_on_The_LoST-Validation_Straightfor?= =?utf-8?q?ward-Naming_Authority_PoinTeR_=28S-NAPTR=29_Application_Service?= =?utf-8?q?_Tag?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8917 Title: The LoST-Validation Straightforward-Naming Authority PoinTeR (S-NAPTR) Application Service Tag Author: R. Gellens, B. Rosen Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: rg+ietf@coretechnologyconsulting.com, br@brianrosen.net Pages: 7 Updates: RFC 5222 I-D Tag: draft-gellens-lost-validation-09.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8917 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8917 This document adds the 'LoST-Validation' service tag to the Straightforward-Naming Authority PoinTeR (S-NAPTR) Application Service Tag IANA registry. This tag can appear in a Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) Domain Name System (DNS) record to assist clients of the Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Protocol in identifying LoST servers designated for location validation. This tag and the information about its use update RFC 5222, which enables the explicit discovery of a server that supports location validation. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Oct 22 15:45:14 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687073A08C3 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:45:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0N5sXG0HUZY3 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCB3F3A08CA for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F53F406F5; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:45:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2DA48F406F5; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:45:05 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201022224505.2DA48F406F5@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:45:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8919_on_IS-IS_Application-Specific_Link?= =?utf-8?q?_Attributes?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lsr@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8919 Title: IS-IS Application-Specific Link Attributes Author: L. Ginsberg, P. Psenak, S. Previdi, W. Henderickx, J. Drake Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: ginsberg@cisco.com, ppsenak@cisco.com, stefano@previdi.net, wim.henderickx@nokia.com, jdrake@juniper.net Pages: 20 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-isis-te-app-19.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8919 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8919 Existing traffic-engineering-related link attribute advertisements have been defined and are used in RSVP-TE deployments. Since the original RSVP-TE use case was defined, additional applications (e.g., Segment Routing Policy and Loop-Free Alternates) that also make use of the link attribute advertisements have been defined. In cases where multiple applications wish to make use of these link attributes, the current advertisements do not support application-specific values for a given attribute, nor do they support indication of which applications are using the advertised value for a given link. This document introduces new link attribute advertisements that address both of these shortcomings. This document is a product of the Link State Routing Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Thu Oct 22 15:45:36 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942A73A0A06 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:45:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xpev6vQSr4DP for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 985C03A09D6 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92698F4072C; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:45:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 75577F4072C; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:45:26 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201022224526.75577F4072C@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8920_on_OSPF_Application-Specific_Link_?= =?utf-8?q?Attributes?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: lsr@ietf.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8920 Title: OSPF Application-Specific Link Attributes Author: P. Psenak, Ed., L. Ginsberg, W. Henderickx, J. Tantsura, J. Drake Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: ppsenak@cisco.com, ginsberg@cisco.com, wim.henderickx@nokia.com, jefftant.ietf@gmail.com, jdrake@juniper.net Pages: 19 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-16.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8920 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8920 Existing traffic-engineering-related link attribute advertisements have been defined and are used in RSVP-TE deployments. Since the original RSVP-TE use case was defined, additional applications (e.g., Segment Routing Policy and Loop-Free Alternates) that also make use of the link attribute advertisements have been defined. In cases where multiple applications wish to make use of these link attributes, the current advertisements do not support application-specific values for a given attribute, nor do they support indication of which applications are using the advertised value for a given link. This document introduces new link attribute advertisements in OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 that address both of these shortcomings. This document is a product of the Link State Routing Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Oct 23 11:47:39 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FBA3A10DB for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:47:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q0UwDVrEjBBK for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 972C03A10E0 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECAAF4073B; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:47:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3A7FFF4073A; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:47:30 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org, irtf-announce@irtf.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201023184730.3A7FFF4073A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8884_on_Research_Directions_for_Using_I?= =?utf-8?q?nformation-Centric_Networking_=28ICN=29_in_Disaster_Scenarios?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, icnrg@irtf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8884 Title: Research Directions for Using Information-Centric Networking (ICN) in Disaster Scenarios Author: J. Seedorf, M. Arumaithurai, A. Tagami, K. Ramakrishnan, N. Blefari-Melazzi Status: Informational Stream: IRTF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: jan.seedorf@hft-stuttgart.de, arumaithurai@informatik.uni-goettingen.de, tagami@kddi-research.jp, kkramakrishnan@yahoo.com, blefari@uniroma2.it Pages: 17 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-irtf-icnrg-disaster-10.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8884 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8884 Information-Centric Networking (ICN) is a new paradigm where the network provides users with named content instead of communication channels between hosts. This document outlines some research directions for ICN with respect to applying ICN approaches for coping with natural or human-generated, large-scale disasters. This document is a product of the Information-Centric Networking Research Group (ICNRG). This document is a product of the Information-Centric Networking Research Group of the IRTF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce, rfc-dist and IRTF-Announce lists.To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-announce For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Oct 23 14:15:19 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863643A0844 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:15:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mANp5WDwBQgT for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C68023A08BB for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C1EF4071E; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:15:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id F0FFFF4071A; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:15:07 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201023211507.F0FFFF4071A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8914_on_Extended_DNS_Errors?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dnsop@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8914 Title: Extended DNS Errors Author: W. Kumari, E. Hunt, R. Arends, W. Hardaker, D. Lawrence Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: warren@kumari.net, each@isc.org, roy.arends@icann.org, ietf@hardakers.net, tale@dd.org Pages: 13 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-16.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8914 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8914 This document defines an extensible method to return additional information about the cause of DNS errors. Though created primarily to extend SERVFAIL to provide additional information about the cause of DNS and DNSSEC failures, the Extended DNS Errors option defined in this document allows all response types to contain extended error information. Extended DNS Error information does not change the processing of RCODEs. This document is a product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Oct 23 14:45:56 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C1A3A0112 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:45:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VacmZuBICAaf for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8D73A08B8 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:45:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F524F4071A; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:45:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id BFFCFF4071A; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:45:46 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201023214546.BFFCFF4071A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?BCP_232=2C_RFC_8932_on_Recommendations_for_?= =?utf-8?q?DNS_Privacy_Service_Operators?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, dns-privacy@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 232 RFC 8932 Title: Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service Operators Author: S. Dickinson, B. Overeinder, R. van Rijswijk-Deij, A. Mankin Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: sara@sinodun.com, benno@NLnetLabs.nl, roland@nlnetlabs.nl, allison.mankin@gmail.com Pages: 34 See Also: BCP 232 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-14.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8932 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8932 This document presents operational, policy, and security considerations for DNS recursive resolver operators who choose to offer DNS privacy services. With these recommendations, the operator can make deliberate decisions regarding which services to provide, as well as understanding how those decisions and the alternatives impact the privacy of users. This document also presents a non-normative framework to assist writers of a Recursive operator Privacy Statement, analogous to DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) Policies and DNSSEC Practice Statements described in RFC 6841. This document is a product of the DNS PRIVate Exchange Working Group of the IETF. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Fri Oct 23 15:38:05 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B477C3A0A63 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:38:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o7h90K3soeWg for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 095DB3A09F7 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4734EF40737; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:37:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E0F33F40737; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:37:54 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201023223754.E0F33F40737@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8940_on_Extensible_Authentication_Proto?= =?utf-8?q?col_=28EAP=29_Session-Id_Derivation_for_EAP_Subscriber_Identity?= =?utf-8?q?_Module_=28EAP-SIM=29=2C_EAP_Authentication_and_Key_Agreement_?= =?utf-8?q?=28EAP-AKA=29=2C_and_Protected_EAP_=28PEAP=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, emu@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8940 Title: Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Session-Id Derivation for EAP Subscriber Identity Module (EAP-SIM), EAP Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA), and Protected EAP (PEAP) Author: A. DeKok Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: aland@freeradius.org Pages: 7 Updates: RFC 5247 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-emu-eap-session-id-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8940 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8940 RFC 5247 is updated to define and clarify EAP Session-Id derivation for multiple Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) methods. The derivation of Session-Id was not given for EAP Subscriber Identity Module (EAP-SIM) or EAP Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA) when using the fast reconnect exchange instead of full authentication. The derivation of Session-Id for full authentication is clarified for both EAP-SIM and EAP-AKA. The derivation of Session-Id for Protected EAP (PEAP) is also given. The definition for PEAP follows the definition for other TLS-based EAP methods. This document is a product of the EAP Method Update Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sat Oct 24 13:47:13 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14803A10FC for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:47:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yzvazYmB8VpQ for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3802F3A112A for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B968F4071F; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:46:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4F79FF4071E; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:46:58 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201024204658.4F79FF4071E@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 13:46:58 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8905_on_The_=27payto=27_URI_Scheme_for_?= =?utf-8?q?Payments?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8905 Title: The 'payto' URI Scheme for Payments Author: F. Dold, C. Grothoff Status: Informational Stream: Independent Date: October 2020 Mailbox: dold@taler.net, christian.grothoff@bfh.ch Pages: 12 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-dold-payto-14.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8905 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8905 This document defines the 'payto' Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) scheme for designating targets for payments. A unified URI scheme for all payment target types allows applications to offer user interactions with URIs that represent payment targets, simplifying the introduction of new payment systems and applications. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sat Oct 31 12:22:07 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA113A0AEC for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:22:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EcGbdn4-VxVi for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADFA23A0AE8 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02AE8F40722; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:21:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id F2C63F40721; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:21:47 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201031192147.F2C63F40721@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:21:47 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8934_on_PCE_Communication_Protocol_=28P?= =?utf-8?q?CEP=29_Extensions_for_Label_Switched_Path_=28LSP=29_Scheduling_?= =?utf-8?q?with_Stateful_PCE?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pce@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8934 Title: PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Label Switched Path (LSP) Scheduling with Stateful PCE Author: H. Chen, Ed., Y. Zhuang, Ed., Q. Wu, D. Ceccarelli Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: huaimo.chen@futurewei.com, zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com, bill.wu@huawei.com, daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com Pages: 23 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-27.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8934 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8934 This document defines a set of extensions to the stateful PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) to enable Label Switched Path (LSP) path computation, activation, setup, and deletion based on scheduled time intervals for the LSP and the actual network resource usage in a centralized network environment, as stated in RFC 8413. This document is a product of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org From rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sat Oct 31 12:44:02 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-dist-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47353A0D91 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:44:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k2qXP4VGRg0C for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DA5D3A0D90 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA93F4071D; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:43:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Delivered-To: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 856A3F4071D; Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:43:43 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20201031194343.856A3F4071D@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 12:43:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [rfc-dist] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8916_on_A_YANG_Data_Model_for_the_Multi?= =?utf-8?q?cast_Source_Discovery_Protocol_=28MSDP=29?= X-BeenThere: rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: RFC Announcements List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, pim@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: rfc-dist-bounces@rfc-editor.org Sender: "rfc-dist" A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8916 Title: A YANG Data Model for the Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) Author: X. Liu, Z. Zhang, Ed., A. Peter, M. Sivakumar, F. Guo, P. McAllister Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: October 2020 Mailbox: xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com, zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn, anish.ietf@gmail.com, sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com, guofeng@huawei.com, pete.mcallister@metaswitch.com Pages: 37 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang-18.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8916 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8916 This document defines a YANG data model for the configuration and management of Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) protocol operations. This document is a product of the Protocols for IP Multicast Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ rfc-dist mailing list rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist http://www.rfc-editor.org