From nobody Wed Feb 1 02:09:50 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B241D12996F for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 02:09:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DRHAlZU7ePrI for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 02:09:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35F65129972 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 02:09:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id c85so31251045wmi.1 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 02:09:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:reply-to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BbzXZV24wyuDPehydZp+4ut1SemYDC82qcnS4NRp018=; b=jf9anomqP4ARSNeUGHYeWweuO679d2CfiKcIUWN3NPWsL+eV1Ne7qTL7I7SQ/4ac3N GkBaIfgwnFuvX3cIF83Gx2Hwl2H3BB9IKdCgg2ANzH6JGe1EskyhW5A60Y6n/X0e3yc6 XHQNWZTl7ATzJHj56CHrKKRUVB7El269d4SLIhAOxO5l224mlVTyaoQHoeAlKsbvayDC 6RPuOtXr50R18A5alZsXH/HWj8q0ZOtyXwE3V+0Jrcyus5QcRwEORCNRk+dkctZoV5qs nupDwkOqmgDRhT6+xWbHtJsygg50/0JoqDj0UHbXnIA+gl16gLzrTSZ2HHw1kr6n2yl5 DRvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:reply-to:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BbzXZV24wyuDPehydZp+4ut1SemYDC82qcnS4NRp018=; b=c9cO86hypibiktuQqEwk3bzbAKyqE0Xff/9CExQgJeErX5zVh7aUxcNWS08lU1dMDX 2I8X4qb0nqlnB/hmbMElYlaus+V+pY/HDc5EZ9QxuOK7Ln+8qYdECqYdHgGbBmxmQrLA l3a+aFL+C6SQAkoyPfiNBhLqfdHs0LgF3/qE/c7YmYoStBix9nLR3pIml3tWkTQWEXNW 66oZAiySjdLdUDeL7RFiIrLIOmjqP5mqqbAsm0Ae2uF2W4CVOunWUj1u6S5BoJSo9ho0 nL7MlcmHzDTVRVRVvKvQTx4+epNXFp9hnCfkbL9pXqnPcjCBlqgzl9gFRUttPoetS2TN 7HFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJ6q8QF6eshnffqOhBnUG7N9eJgTZouUbYvDFqQY0kHqbUQbu+inkrOrj7VAAVMJg== X-Received: by 10.28.174.208 with SMTP id x199mr2347125wme.107.1485943785478; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 02:09:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mn-mn0F-2.local (p20030006314A2C64003E4138C937182A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:6:314a:2c64:3e:4138:c937:182a]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q12sm28800449wmd.8.2017.02.01.02.09.44 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Feb 2017 02:09:44 -0800 (PST) To: "rmcat WG (rmcat@ietf.org)" From: Martin Stiemerling Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 11:09:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [rmcat] Planning for the upcoming IETF 98, Chicago, IL, USA X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: rmcat-chairs@ietf.org List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 10:09:49 -0000 Dear all, The WG chairs would like to get a poll about who out of the rmcat WG intends to travel to the IETF 98 meeting in Chicago. Please let us know until Feb 5th midnight by replying to this email. We would plan for an interim meeting shortly after the IETF 98 meeting in case that there is not a critical mass intending to attend a RMCAT session. Regards, Martin From nobody Wed Feb 1 07:49:07 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9020129E5F; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 07:49:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -17.72 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tZz_OxEXgk5M; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 07:49:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C812E129E56; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 07:49:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1177; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1485964145; x=1487173745; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=N+q9wuUO37qiKk/AipCBPNioywDmjJ2bvXEYWvS81Ik=; b=DcfqEY3Qmy70/s6rC4XJCMXGbZwjVFSYgVSmz6VEJHbb/JFgUM76Kexr ZXp5CnXr3feDFBhJXXfH/Z9TrhA/ONN3rXa6Q7OGgPRosxTKWortIYXCt 92Eyr85nCkm6ZZktxQHUrsnnNiPB67B1yYGugpPBdwyONm4YNpWt8CoBw Y=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AVAQAUA5JY/4oNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1OBageGHIc9kgeDfwEDhAmLGoIPgg2GIgKCNj8YAQIBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BYiiEaQEBAQSBCQIBCBEEAQEKJQ8SER0IAgQBEolaAxWvAYc5DYNqAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEhhkuEb4JRgU4RARyFZQEEj3aLLjgBjWuEF4F5hRWJb4gnggK?= =?us-ascii?q?IVwEfOHZVFYZ7dYVwgSGBDAEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,320,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="203265632" Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Feb 2017 15:49:04 +0000 Received: from XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (xch-rcd-019.cisco.com [173.37.102.29]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v11Fn4hL008664 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:49:05 GMT Received: from xch-rcd-016.cisco.com (173.37.102.26) by XCH-RCD-019.cisco.com (173.37.102.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 09:49:04 -0600 Received: from xch-rcd-016.cisco.com ([173.37.102.26]) by XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com ([173.37.102.26]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 09:49:04 -0600 From: "Xiaoqing Zhu (xiaoqzhu)" To: "rmcat WG (rmcat@ietf.org)" , "rmcat-chairs@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [rmcat] Planning for the upcoming IETF 98, Chicago, IL, USA Thread-Index: AQHSfHNV87oSS988AEqumnGfHmKWBaFUS/ha Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:49:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1485964144096.16883@cisco.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.152.244.84] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [rmcat] Planning for the upcoming IETF 98, Chicago, IL, USA X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 15:49:06 -0000 Hi, =0A= =0A= I plan to attend and present update on both the NADA draft and the video-tr= affic-model draft. =0A= =0A= By then we may also have made some progress regarding our open sourcing eff= orts with the reference implementation in ns3 module corresponding to the f= ramework draft. But on that piece since it involves internal legal approval= it's a "maybe"=0A= =0A= Thanks,=0A= Xiaoqing=0A= =0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: rmcat on behalf of Martin Stiemerling =0A= Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 4:09 AM=0A= To: rmcat WG (rmcat@ietf.org)=0A= Subject: [rmcat] Planning for the upcoming IETF 98, Chicago, IL, USA=0A= =0A= Dear all,=0A= =0A= The WG chairs would like to get a poll about who out of the rmcat WG=0A= intends to travel to the IETF 98 meeting in Chicago.=0A= =0A= Please let us know until Feb 5th midnight by replying to this email.=0A= =0A= We would plan for an interim meeting shortly after the IETF 98 meeting=0A= in case that there is not a critical mass intending to attend a RMCAT=0A= session.=0A= =0A= Regards,=0A= =0A= Martin=0A= =0A= From nobody Fri Feb 10 09:38:37 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C4C129A6B for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:38:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GGr2MLFmK0kH for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:38:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from tiger.dc.kau.se (smtp.kau.se [193.10.220.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21DC0129A5B for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:38:33 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Processed: mail.kau.se, Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:38:26 +0100 (not processed: spam filter heuristic analysis disabled) X-MDRemoteIP: 95.192.10.244 X-MDArrival-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:38:26 +0100 X-Authenticated-Sender: anna.brunstrom@kau.se X-Return-Path: anna.brunstrom@kau.se X-Envelope-From: anna.brunstrom@kau.se X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rmcat@ietf.org To: "rmcat@ietf.org" References: From: Anna Brunstrom Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:38:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [rmcat] No rmcat session at IETF 98 X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:38:36 -0000 Dear all, As we only have one probable and three confirmed attendees for an rmcat session in Chicago, we will not hold a meeting this time. We will come back shortly for instead scheduling a virtual interim a few weeks after IETF 98. Best Regards, Anna On 2017-02-01 11:09, Martin Stiemerling wrote: > Dear all, > > The WG chairs would like to get a poll about who out of the rmcat WG > intends to travel to the IETF 98 meeting in Chicago. > > Please let us know until Feb 5th midnight by replying to this email. > > We would plan for an interim meeting shortly after the IETF 98 meeting > in case that there is not a critical mass intending to attend a RMCAT > session. > > Regards, > > Martin > From nobody Fri Feb 10 09:42:08 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rmcat@ietf.org Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0972129A6B; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:42:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "\"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool\"" To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.43.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <148674852568.29239.10066996280418832281.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:42:05 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: rmcat-chairs@ietf.org, ietf@kuehlewind.net, anna.brunstrom@kau.se, rmcat@ietf.org Subject: [rmcat] rmcat - Not having a session at IETF 98 X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:42:06 -0000 Anna Brunstrom, a chair of the rmcat working group, indicated that the rmcat working group does not plan to hold a session at IETF 98. This message was generated and sent by the IETF Meeting Session Request Tool. From nobody Wed Feb 15 05:51:42 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rmcat@ietf.org Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D7C1296E1; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 05:51:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.43.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <148716670068.17398.9010645131471752012.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 05:51:40 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: rmcat@ietf.org Subject: [rmcat] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06.txt X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:51:40 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques of the IETF. Title : Shared Bottleneck Detection for Coupled Congestion Control for RTP Media. Authors : David Hayes Simone Ferlin Michael Welzl Kristian Hiorth Filename : draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06.txt Pages : 23 Date : 2017-02-15 Abstract: This document describes a mechanism to detect whether end-to-end data flows share a common bottleneck. It relies on summary statistics that are calculated based on continuous measurements and used as input to a grouping algorithm that runs wherever the knowledge is needed. This mechanism complements the coupled congestion control mechanism in draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Wed Feb 15 06:12:24 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30705129623 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 06:12:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=simula-no.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c12keSoPOTm8 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 06:12:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf0-x236.google.com (mail-lf0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60106129607 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 06:12:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id x1so81631404lff.0 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 06:12:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=simula-no.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=references:user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=NvOvBRRmbaGrlIrBSg8i5npSQQxOTCB6ly05cESFX00=; b=vS3EbidtZt3UiFej0M1LBz56rXuhDm3aXsOJi4aNclAtzz4VSThGiTQ+HPVxKRzoSv RKZwOOTL69emwTG0EU7ozTXxUHi7ksgPPnpCkyam0D2dbM7Ditm1huuLRr81kd87FpnP 3SzHD6hgQjx5/Oy5WAbzApei1gF2F2Ko7WfvCJDDqXGM2Uis7ouzMe7cY0AmpY39S14v GEGik5tBk78bv3jYoUgO7HkhtfSe+Wpq+p+4Qa9HXx5a/GPWwk1dZkriqmXvb1+23DDL OKCFvphhjUyvTcAfdSWuKJKYZS55vvsJT7mcslgg809y3+VsOI8NQAxLKBlfqwqNsCWq OHWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=NvOvBRRmbaGrlIrBSg8i5npSQQxOTCB6ly05cESFX00=; b=DL1JomeTcGdDaqEnNexHhfm4XyPKqnYZioxS2waLUZgng3rYkiRl7HJiDMbL4KVIKt Ktp5YnledxqC0RhhtbGmReHIYutWKfWkVg0SgKc7OHwDgvHU2qaqgv+hIUtPLr7GScTQ ZIWCwLU2pAnwpHgxIye37zGf7Hau49JTQ+zptyGW8AJbT6ZX9R4iBzW1jXWP6THxzP4U Ptcz+fWv122OWyBJA53cm2H3cTLEPRFv4pRj6JUQRRXzCye3MbtjOqW77e5yNJ2yJfua O2rKCZg0xxkJOMnPYZ+pGPtwaik+v3vZ8TAMGvRMLsbDz7anQY+knOIZV+ld80uebHWU 9eag== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kOJFifjwJuiS/ogl+8KN24FKut2Dgo2iDdI9TW0wQXYbNejeE/SljRWYUOp0iqYbLa X-Received: by 10.25.37.65 with SMTP id l62mr11023129lfl.137.1487167933450; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 06:12:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2a02:270:2014:40:c67d:46ff:fe17:5bed]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q63sm977181lfi.54.2017.02.15.06.12.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 06:12:12 -0800 (PST) References: <148716670078.17398.9264465144430868332.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 24.5.1 From: David Hayes To: "rmcat\@ietf.org" Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:12:12 +0100 Message-ID: <87mvdnsfur.fsf@simula.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Archived-At: Subject: [rmcat] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06.txt X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:12:23 -0000 Hi, This is a revision of the SBD draft addressing the reviews done by Colin and Ingemar (Thanks!). The changes are mainly clarifications of aspects highlighted in the reviews. The biggest change in doing this was moving 3 subsections that were in section 3. Two of them to form their own section, and one to join the timing section (now section 5). Once again, thank you Colin and Ingemar! Kind regards, David On Wed, Feb 15 2017 at 14:51, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06.txt > has been successfully submitted by David Hayes and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd > Revision: 06 > Title: Shared Bottleneck Detection for Coupled Congestion Control for RTP Media. > Document date: 2017-02-15 > Group: rmcat > Pages: 23 > URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd/ > Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06 > Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06 > > Abstract: > This document describes a mechanism to detect whether end-to-end data > flows share a common bottleneck. It relies on summary statistics > that are calculated based on continuous measurements and used as > input to a grouping algorithm that runs wherever the knowledge is > needed. This mechanism complements the coupled congestion control > mechanism in draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat -- David Hayes From nobody Sat Feb 18 10:05:53 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5915F1270B4 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:05:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L2jBbk0anUhv for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:05:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from tiger.dc.kau.se (smtp.kau.se [193.10.220.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 764BC1293DB for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:05:50 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Processed: mail.kau.se, Sat, 18 Feb 2017 19:05:42 +0100 (not processed: spam filter heuristic analysis disabled) X-MDRemoteIP: 213.113.183.176 X-MDArrival-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 19:05:42 +0100 X-Authenticated-Sender: anna.brunstrom@kau.se X-Return-Path: anna.brunstrom@kau.se X-Envelope-From: anna.brunstrom@kau.se X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rmcat@ietf.org To: rmcat@ietf.org References: <148716670078.17398.9264465144430868332.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <87mvdnsfur.fsf@simula.no> From: Anna Brunstrom Message-ID: <3aed3bcb-f067-e024-9cdd-1af1110b681d@kau.se> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 19:05:35 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87mvdnsfur.fsf@simula.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [rmcat] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06.txt X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:05:52 -0000 Thanks David for the updated draft! Ingemar and Colin, please let the WG chairs know if the updated draft addresses your comments. Thanks, Anna On 2017-02-15 15:12, David Hayes wrote: > Hi, > > This is a revision of the SBD draft addressing the reviews done by Colin > and Ingemar (Thanks!). The changes are mainly clarifications of aspects > highlighted in the reviews. The biggest change in doing this was moving > 3 subsections that were in section 3. Two of them to form their own > section, and one to join the timing section (now section 5). > > Once again, thank you Colin and Ingemar! > > Kind regards, > > David > > > On Wed, Feb 15 2017 at 14:51, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > >> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06.txt >> has been successfully submitted by David Hayes and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd >> Revision: 06 >> Title: Shared Bottleneck Detection for Coupled Congestion Control for RTP Media. >> Document date: 2017-02-15 >> Group: rmcat >> Pages: 23 >> URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06.txt >> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd/ >> Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06 >> Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rmcat-sbd-06 >> >> Abstract: >> This document describes a mechanism to detect whether end-to-end data >> flows share a common bottleneck. It relies on summary statistics >> that are calculated based on continuous measurements and used as >> input to a grouping algorithm that runs wherever the knowledge is >> needed. This mechanism complements the coupled congestion control >> mechanism in draft-ietf-rmcat-coupled-cc. >> >> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> The IETF Secretariat > > -- > David Hayes > From nobody Sat Feb 18 10:23:10 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rmcat@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCB9129571 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:23:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XVGD-chRl1SG for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:23:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from nasse.dc.kau.se (smtp.kau.se [193.10.220.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE14E1295A3 for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:23:07 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Processed: mail.kau.se, Sat, 18 Feb 2017 19:23:02 +0100 (not processed: spam filter heuristic analysis disabled) X-MDRemoteIP: 213.113.183.176 X-MDArrival-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 19:23:02 +0100 X-Authenticated-Sender: anna.brunstrom@kau.se X-Return-Path: anna.brunstrom@kau.se X-Envelope-From: anna.brunstrom@kau.se X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: rmcat@ietf.org To: "rmcat@ietf.org" From: Anna Brunstrom Message-ID: Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 19:22:52 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [rmcat] Scheduling of virtual interim meeting X-BeenThere: rmcat@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques \(RMCAT\) Working Group discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:23:09 -0000 Dear all, As previously announced, we plan to hold a virtual interim to progress the rmcat work. In order to schedule the interim, please indicate your availability at http://doodle.com/poll/xmzc3hwvuiz2d63s. The poll will close on Monday February 27. Best Regards, Anna On 2017-02-10 18:38, Anna Brunstrom wrote: > Dear all, > > As we only have one probable and three confirmed attendees for an > rmcat session in Chicago, we will not hold a meeting this time. > > We will come back shortly for instead scheduling a virtual interim a > few weeks after IETF 98. > > Best Regards, > Anna > > > On 2017-02-01 11:09, Martin Stiemerling wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> The WG chairs would like to get a poll about who out of the rmcat WG >> intends to travel to the IETF 98 meeting in Chicago. >> >> Please let us know until Feb 5th midnight by replying to this email. >> >> We would plan for an interim meeting shortly after the IETF 98 >> meeting in case that there is not a critical mass intending to attend >> a RMCAT session. >> >> Regards, >> >> Martin >> > >