From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Mon Jul 2 23:30:54 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D964911E813D for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:30:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.152 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.448, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id agl8ohfJ6evu for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:30:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3346521F854F for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:30:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A14C872F1C4; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:29:37 -0700 (PDT) To: widmer@acm.org, m.handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk, wes@mti-systems.com, martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu, lorenzo@vicisano.net, adamson@itd.nrl.navy.mil From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20120703062937.A14C872F1C4@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, kdw@neowiz.com, rmt@ietf.org Subject: [Rmt] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4654 (3274) X-BeenThere: rmt@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Reliable Multicast Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 06:30:55 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4654, "TCP-Friendly Multicast Congestion Control (TFMCC): Protocol Specification". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4654&eid=3274 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Dongwook Kim Section: 5.3 Original Text ------------- If a loss interval, A, is determined to have started with packet sequence number S_A and the next loss interval, B, started with packet sequence number S_B, then the number of packets in loss interval A is given by (S_B - S_A). Corrected Text -------------- If a loss event, A, is determined to have started with packet sequence number S_A and the next loss event, B, started with packet sequence number S_B, then the number of packets in the loss interval between A and B is given by (S_B - S_A). Notes ----- Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC4654 (draft-ietf-rmt-bb-tfmcc-07) -------------------------------------- Title : TCP-Friendly Multicast Congestion Control (TFMCC): Protocol Specification Publication Date : August 2006 Author(s) : J. Widmer, M. Handley Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Reliable Multicast Transport Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Thu Jul 12 15:52:14 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D0821F8565; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:52:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.558 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.558 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oT9I3GZRyIOU; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5843321F857A; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.30p3 Message-ID: <20120712225213.22148.34028.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:52:13 -0700 Cc: rmt chair , rmt mailing list , RFC Editor Subject: [Rmt] Protocol Action: 'FLUTE - File Delivery over Unidirectional Transport' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-rmt-flute-revised-16.txt) X-BeenThere: rmt@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Reliable Multicast Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:52:14 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'FLUTE - File Delivery over Unidirectional Transport' (draft-ietf-rmt-flute-revised-16.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Reliable Multicast Transport Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Martin Stiemerling and Wesley Eddy. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmt-flute-revised/ Technical Summary This document defines FLUTE, a protocol for the unidirectional delivery of files over the Internet, which is particularly suited to multicast networks. The specification builds on Asynchronous Layered Coding, the base protocol designed for massively scalable multicast distribution. This document obsoletes RFC3926. Working Group Summary This document represents a solid consensus of the RMT WG. Flute version 1 was published as an Experimental protocol. It has been widely implemented, including most of the changes in this document. Many implementers compared notes and updated their implementations. This document reflects industry updates to the original FLUTE design. There was dissent over changing the version number, but there was rough consensus (including IESG push) that it is important to be able to distinguish version 1 from version 2 on-the-wire, because version 2 is not backwards compatible with version 1. Protocol Quality The WG reviewed the spec, and there are a number of implementations. I (the AD) believe this specification is in wide use in shipping products. From Brian.Adamson@nrl.navy.mil Tue Jul 17 08:12:12 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B77921F86BD for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 08:12:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t8ay5XZUYC2b for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 08:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil (s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil [IPv6:2001:480:20:1083:213:21ff:fe1f:5b9c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA72C21F8638 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 08:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.aic.nrl.navy.mil (smtp.aic.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.86.3]) by s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id q6HFClOm026372 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:12:48 -0400 Received: from macsimus.itd.nrl.navy.mil ([132.250.92.151]) by smtp.aic.nrl.navy.mil (SMSSMTP 4.1.16.48) with SMTP id M2012071711124610074 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:12:46 -0400 From: Brian Adamson Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-141--841571702 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 11:10:48 -0400 Message-Id: <28DA258E-6288-4C06-9D08-DA50D2C31F96@nrl.navy.mil> To: rmt@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: [Rmt] IETF 84 RMT - Call for Agenda Items X-BeenThere: rmt@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Reliable Multicast Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:12:12 -0000 --Apple-Mail-141--841571702 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Please submit any RMT Working Group agenda items ASAP. The first draft = agenda is due to tomorrow and I overlooked requesting this on the list = earlier. The RMT WG is scheduled for Tuesday, 31 July 2012. best regards, Brian Adamson brian.adamson@nrl.navy.mil Brian Adamson brian.adamson@nrl.navy.mil --Apple-Mail-141--841571702 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

Please submit any RMT Working Group agenda items ASAP.  The first draft agenda is due to tomorrow and I overlooked requesting this on the list earlier.

The RMT WG is scheduled for Tuesday, 31 July 2012.

best regards,

Brian Adamson
brian.adamson@nrl.navy.mil




--Apple-Mail-141--841571702-- From brian.adamson@nrl.navy.mil Fri Jul 20 14:08:36 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F81921F84EF for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:08:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sHstaw1DfscR for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil (s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil [IPv6:2001:480:20:1083:213:21ff:fe1f:5b9c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D1B21F84EE for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.aic.nrl.navy.mil (smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.86.3]) by s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id q6KL9VuJ022505; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:09:31 -0400 Received: from macsimus.itd.nrl.navy.mil ([132.250.92.151]) by smtp.aic.nrl.navy.mil (SMSSMTP 4.1.16.48) with SMTP id M2012072017093027197 ; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:09:30 -0400 From: Brian Adamson Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-157--560967811 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:07:32 -0400 Message-Id: <64F2424E-FC99-4E2F-B773-3CB51FBEDFC4@nrl.navy.mil> To: rmt@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: [Rmt] IETF 84 RMT Draft Agenda submitted X-BeenThere: rmt@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Reliable Multicast Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 21:08:36 -0000 --Apple-Mail-157--560967811 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I have submitted a draft agenda with the following items: 1) Working Group Status Summary - Brian Adamson 2) FCAST Status (short!) - Vincent Roca 3) Supercharged Codes - Eric Stouffer 4) Open Discussion on GOE, UOD, and RMT Next Steps The posted agenda points to the relevant Internet Drafts. There is room for additional agenda items if requested. best regards, Brian Adamson brian.adamson@nrl.navy.mil --Apple-Mail-157--560967811 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
I have submitted a draft agenda with the following items:

1) Working Group Status Summary - Brian Adamson

2) FCAST Status (short!) - Vincent Roca

3) Supercharged Codes - Eric Stouffer

4) Open Discussion on GOE, UOD, and RMT Next Steps


The posted agenda points to the relevant Internet Drafts.

There is room for additional agenda items if requested.

best regards,


--Apple-Mail-157--560967811-- From wes@mti-systems.com Sat Jul 28 16:05:37 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rmt@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FAC21F865E for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:05:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ojACpeO2gWfq for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omr13.networksolutionsemail.com (omr13.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.63]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C2C21F8661 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cm-omr8 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr13.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6SN5XtB022335 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:05:33 -0400 Authentication-Results: cm-omr8 smtp.user=wes@mti-systems.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com Received: from [46.21.99.28] ([46.21.99.28:50776] helo=[10.10.0.126]) by cm-omr8 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id B6/99-04790-93074105; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:05:33 -0400 Message-ID: <50147030.2020105@mti-systems.com> Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:05:20 -0400 From: Wesley Eddy Organization: MTI Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RFC Errata System References: <20120703062937.A14C872F1C4@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20120703062937.A14C872F1C4@rfc-editor.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rmt@ietf.org, adamson@itd.nrl.navy.mil, m.handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk, kdw@neowiz.com, widmer@acm.org Subject: Re: [Rmt] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4654 (3274) X-BeenThere: rmt@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Reliable Multicast Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 23:05:37 -0000 I propose to "Hold for Document Update" on this, based on the IESG errata processing guidelines. It's not necessary, however someone doing a future update might want to consider it. Unless anyone shouts otherwise, I'll put this in later in the week. On 7/3/2012 2:29 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4654, > "TCP-Friendly Multicast Congestion Control (TFMCC): Protocol Specification". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4654&eid=3274 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Dongwook Kim > > Section: 5.3 > > Original Text > ------------- > If a loss interval, A, is determined to have started with packet > > sequence number S_A and the next loss interval, B, started with > > packet sequence number S_B, then the number of packets in loss > > interval A is given by (S_B - S_A). > > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > If a loss event, A, is determined to have started with packet > > sequence number S_A and the next loss event, B, started with > > packet sequence number S_B, then the number of packets in the loss > > interval between A and B is given by (S_B - S_A). > > > > Notes > ----- > > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC4654 (draft-ietf-rmt-bb-tfmcc-07) > -------------------------------------- > Title : TCP-Friendly Multicast Congestion Control (TFMCC): Protocol Specification > Publication Date : August 2006 > Author(s) : J. Widmer, M. Handley > Category : EXPERIMENTAL > Source : Reliable Multicast Transport > Area : Transport > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems