
From wes@mti-systems.com  Sat Jul 28 16:09:16 2012
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5771E21F8672 for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jzHKSLOBkbcl for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr8.networksolutionsemail.com (omr8.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.58]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D61A21F866B for <rohc@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm-omr4 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr8.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6SN9CFk010116 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:09:12 -0400
Authentication-Results: cm-omr4 smtp.user=wes@mti-systems.com; auth=pass (PLAIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from [46.21.99.28] ([46.21.99.28:53448] helo=[10.10.0.126]) by cm-omr4 (envelope-from <wes@mti-systems.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 5C/65-20013-21174105; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:09:12 -0400
Message-ID: <50147109.2060804@mti-systems.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:08:57 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20120607141450.A242CB1E002@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120607141450.A242CB1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rohc@ietf.org, rohc_team@dialine.fr, ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com, kristofer.sandlund@ericsson.com, martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu
Subject: Re: [rohc] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3248)
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 23:09:16 -0000

This errata looks correct to me; if nobody objects, I'll mark it
as "Verified" in the errata tool later this week.


On 6/7/2012 10:14 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5225,
> "RObust Header Compression Version 2 (ROHCv2): Profiles for RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5225&eid=3248
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: FWX <rohc_team@dialine.fr>
> 
> Section: 6.8.2.4
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> page 67:
> 
>   COMPRESSED udp_lite_endpoint_dynamic {
>     ENFORCE(profile_value == PROFILE_UDPLITE_0108);
>     reserved =:= compressed_value(4, 0)                      [  4 ];
>     coverage_behavior =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>     reorder_ratio     =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>     checksum_coverage =:=
>       checksum_coverage_dynchain(coverage_behavior.UVALUE)   [ 16 ];
>     checksum          =:= irregular(16)                      [ 16 ];
>     msn               =:= irregular(16)                      [ 16 ];
>   }
> 
> page 68:
> 
>   COMPRESSED udp_lite_regular_dynamic {
>     ENFORCE(profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107);
>     coverage_behavior =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>     reserved =:= compressed_value(6, 0)                      [  6 ];
>     checksum_coverage =:=
>         checksum_coverage_dynchain(coverage_behavior.UVALUE) [ 16 ];
>     checksum =:= irregular(16)                               [ 16 ];
>   }
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> page 67:
> 
>   COMPRESSED udp_lite_endpoint_dynamic {
>     ENFORCE(profile_value == PROFILE_UDPLITE_0108);
>     reserved =:= compressed_value(4, 0)                      [  4 ];
>     coverage_behavior =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>     reorder_ratio     =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>     checksum_coverage =:=
>       checksum_coverage_dynchain(coverage_behavior.UVALUE)   [ 0, 16 ];  <===
>     checksum          =:= irregular(16)                      [ 16 ];
>     msn               =:= irregular(16)                      [ 16 ];
>   }
> 
> page 68:
> 
>   COMPRESSED udp_lite_regular_dynamic {
>     ENFORCE(profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107);
>     coverage_behavior =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>     reserved =:= compressed_value(6, 0)                      [  6 ];
>     checksum_coverage =:=
>         checksum_coverage_dynchain(coverage_behavior.UVALUE) [ 0, 16 ];  <====
>     checksum =:= irregular(16)                               [ 16 ];
>   }
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> checksum_coverage_dynchain(behavior) compression method (page 66) may compress the checksum_coverage field to 0 bits if behavior is set to UDP_LITE_COVERAGE_INFERRED.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5225 (draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-06)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : RObust Header Compression Version 2 (ROHCv2): Profiles for RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite
> Publication Date    : April 2008
> Author(s)           : G. Pelletier, K. Sandlund
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Robust Header Compression
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> _______________________________________________
> Rohc mailing list
> Rohc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc
> 
> 


-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems

From rohc_team@dialine.fr  Sun Jul 29 02:08:32 2012
Return-Path: <rohc_team@dialine.fr>
X-Original-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E4021F866D for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 02:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.048
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IOpiVWjrWSjA for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 02:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (smtp6-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9660A21F8646 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 02:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [88.185.172.218]) by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AFC82252; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:08:20 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5014FD85.5000803@dialine.fr>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:08:21 +0200
From: RoHC Team <rohc_team@dialine.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
References: <20120607141450.A242CB1E002@rfc-editor.org> <50147109.2060804@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <50147109.2060804@mti-systems.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120729-0, 29/07/2012), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Cc: rohc@ietf.org, ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com, kristofer.sandlund@ericsson.com, martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu, rohc_team@dialine.fr, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [rohc] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3248)
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rohc_team@dialine.fr
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:08:32 -0000

  Hello,

  Thank you for your post.

  Best regards,

              FWX.

Le 29/07/2012 01:08, Wesley Eddy a écrit :
> This errata looks correct to me; if nobody objects, I'll mark it
> as "Verified" in the errata tool later this week.
>
>
> On 6/7/2012 10:14 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
>>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5225,
>> "RObust Header Compression Version 2 (ROHCv2): Profiles for RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5225&eid=3248
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: FWX <rohc_team@dialine.fr>
>>
>> Section: 6.8.2.4
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> page 67:
>>
>>    COMPRESSED udp_lite_endpoint_dynamic {
>>      ENFORCE(profile_value == PROFILE_UDPLITE_0108);
>>      reserved =:= compressed_value(4, 0)                      [  4 ];
>>      coverage_behavior =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>>      reorder_ratio     =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>>      checksum_coverage =:=
>>        checksum_coverage_dynchain(coverage_behavior.UVALUE)   [ 16 ];
>>      checksum          =:= irregular(16)                      [ 16 ];
>>      msn               =:= irregular(16)                      [ 16 ];
>>    }
>>
>> page 68:
>>
>>    COMPRESSED udp_lite_regular_dynamic {
>>      ENFORCE(profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107);
>>      coverage_behavior =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>>      reserved =:= compressed_value(6, 0)                      [  6 ];
>>      checksum_coverage =:=
>>          checksum_coverage_dynchain(coverage_behavior.UVALUE) [ 16 ];
>>      checksum =:= irregular(16)                               [ 16 ];
>>    }
>>
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> page 67:
>>
>>    COMPRESSED udp_lite_endpoint_dynamic {
>>      ENFORCE(profile_value == PROFILE_UDPLITE_0108);
>>      reserved =:= compressed_value(4, 0)                      [  4 ];
>>      coverage_behavior =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>>      reorder_ratio     =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>>      checksum_coverage =:=
>>        checksum_coverage_dynchain(coverage_behavior.UVALUE)   [ 0, 16 ];  <===
>>      checksum          =:= irregular(16)                      [ 16 ];
>>      msn               =:= irregular(16)                      [ 16 ];
>>    }
>>
>> page 68:
>>
>>    COMPRESSED udp_lite_regular_dynamic {
>>      ENFORCE(profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107);
>>      coverage_behavior =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>>      reserved =:= compressed_value(6, 0)                      [  6 ];
>>      checksum_coverage =:=
>>          checksum_coverage_dynchain(coverage_behavior.UVALUE) [ 0, 16 ];  <====
>>      checksum =:= irregular(16)                               [ 16 ];
>>    }
>>
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> checksum_coverage_dynchain(behavior) compression method (page 66) may compress the checksum_coverage field to 0 bits if behavior is set to UDP_LITE_COVERAGE_INFERRED.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC5225 (draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-06)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : RObust Header Compression Version 2 (ROHCv2): Profiles for RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite
>> Publication Date    : April 2008
>> Author(s)           : G. Pelletier, K. Sandlund
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Robust Header Compression
>> Area                : Transport
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rohc mailing list
>> Rohc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc
>>
>>
>
>

From carl.knutsson@effnet.com  Mon Jul 30 23:22:10 2012
Return-Path: <carl.knutsson@effnet.com>
X-Original-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rohc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0683821F85D6 for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id afZn24gk-iN9 for <rohc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.levonline.com (lists.levonline.com [217.70.33.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FCA21F85C4 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by lists.levonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE250268472 for <rohc@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:22:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lists.levonline.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.levonline.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3qJ6QfqPa6Fp for <rohc@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:22:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from traktor1.fordonnet.levonline.com (webhotel.fordon.levonline.com [217.70.32.2]) by lists.levonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79B32683CB; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:22:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.101.21] (c-c40271d5.04-205-6c756c1.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [213.113.2.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by traktor1.fordonnet.levonline.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6V6M1EN028287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:22:02 +0200
Message-ID: <50177983.5030906@effnet.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:21:55 +0200
From: Carl Knutsson <carl.knutsson@effnet.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
References: <20120607141450.A242CB1E002@rfc-editor.org> <50147109.2060804@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <50147109.2060804@mti-systems.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rohc@ietf.org, rohc_team@dialine.fr, ghyslain.pelletier@ericsson.com, kristofer.sandlund@ericsson.com, martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [rohc] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5225 (3248)
X-BeenThere: rohc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Robust Header Compression <rohc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rohc>
List-Post: <mailto:rohc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc>, <mailto:rohc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 06:22:10 -0000

It looks correct to me too.

/Calle

On 07/29/2012 01:08 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote:
> This errata looks correct to me; if nobody objects, I'll mark it
> as "Verified" in the errata tool later this week.
> 
> 
> On 6/7/2012 10:14 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
>>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5225,
>> "RObust Header Compression Version 2 (ROHCv2): Profiles for RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5225&eid=3248
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: FWX <rohc_team@dialine.fr>
>>
>> Section: 6.8.2.4
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> page 67:
>>
>>   COMPRESSED udp_lite_endpoint_dynamic {
>>     ENFORCE(profile_value == PROFILE_UDPLITE_0108);
>>     reserved =:= compressed_value(4, 0)                      [  4 ];
>>     coverage_behavior =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>>     reorder_ratio     =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>>     checksum_coverage =:=
>>       checksum_coverage_dynchain(coverage_behavior.UVALUE)   [ 16 ];
>>     checksum          =:= irregular(16)                      [ 16 ];
>>     msn               =:= irregular(16)                      [ 16 ];
>>   }
>>
>> page 68:
>>
>>   COMPRESSED udp_lite_regular_dynamic {
>>     ENFORCE(profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107);
>>     coverage_behavior =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>>     reserved =:= compressed_value(6, 0)                      [  6 ];
>>     checksum_coverage =:=
>>         checksum_coverage_dynchain(coverage_behavior.UVALUE) [ 16 ];
>>     checksum =:= irregular(16)                               [ 16 ];
>>   }
>>
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> page 67:
>>
>>   COMPRESSED udp_lite_endpoint_dynamic {
>>     ENFORCE(profile_value == PROFILE_UDPLITE_0108);
>>     reserved =:= compressed_value(4, 0)                      [  4 ];
>>     coverage_behavior =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>>     reorder_ratio     =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>>     checksum_coverage =:=
>>       checksum_coverage_dynchain(coverage_behavior.UVALUE)   [ 0, 16 ];  <===
>>     checksum          =:= irregular(16)                      [ 16 ];
>>     msn               =:= irregular(16)                      [ 16 ];
>>   }
>>
>> page 68:
>>
>>   COMPRESSED udp_lite_regular_dynamic {
>>     ENFORCE(profile_value == PROFILE_RTP_0107);
>>     coverage_behavior =:= irregular(2)                       [  2 ];
>>     reserved =:= compressed_value(6, 0)                      [  6 ];
>>     checksum_coverage =:=
>>         checksum_coverage_dynchain(coverage_behavior.UVALUE) [ 0, 16 ];  <====
>>     checksum =:= irregular(16)                               [ 16 ];
>>   }
>>
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> checksum_coverage_dynchain(behavior) compression method (page 66) may compress the checksum_coverage field to 0 bits if behavior is set to UDP_LITE_COVERAGE_INFERRED.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC5225 (draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-06)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : RObust Header Compression Version 2 (ROHCv2): Profiles for RTP, UDP, IP, ESP and UDP-Lite
>> Publication Date    : April 2008
>> Author(s)           : G. Pelletier, K. Sandlund
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Robust Header Compression
>> Area                : Transport
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rohc mailing list
>> Rohc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc
>>
>>
> 
> 

