Subject: [Roll] Supporting RPL as WG document

From: "Mikko Saarnivala" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 00:19:00 +0300 (EEST)

Rollers,

As the subject line already reveals, I'm in favour of accepting the RPL as
an official WG document as I feel that it is the most promising one of the
individual submissions. I'm certain that the WG can work out a very good
solution for the P2P routing as well.

-- 
Mikko Saarnivala