From nobody Tue Apr 29 08:33:10 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: routing-discussion@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A43B1A0914 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:33:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3XClYEPIv2HO for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3FA1A08E3 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s3TFX5Qx022349 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:33:05 +0100 Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s3TFX4RT022337 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:33:04 +0100 From: "Adrian Farrel" To: Subject: What nits do ADs whinge about? Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:33:01 +0100 Message-ID: <05a001cf63c0$4ebca410$ec35ec30$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac9jv6EjXdTDBHVPQhyldWpxE2Qu3Q== Content-Language: en-gb X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1017-20662.007 X-TM-AS-Result: No--6.058-10.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--6.058-10.0-31-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: IZ0a092lbEX0ZTCoft0wXEKcYi5Qw/RV1Ga2L87qPQIifM7JMNHW60fT bYOVmH5hj9u+HCvKLpYN/ykoU46mUlkLs09Mm9SU081phgl5F/mC7C2rJeUToUavwbe/bczf876 azl5+m3vi8zVgXoAltlwtzewu2M63tuZmiwj/lnLdB/CxWTRRu4as+d5/8j56EtXo2TF+ENyDlY 6EaxWE6fOhUgyQ8GU5DLJHXd5b11l0YHKn7N1oOA== Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/routing-discussion/Ed4pVFUPww6MB5RNVugAButqLOI X-BeenThere: routing-discussion@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk List-Id: Routing Area General mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:33:09 -0000 Hi, In London I gave a presentation to the MPLS WG in about what I look for (and find) when reviewing I-Ds as an AD after publication has been requested. Since this attracted some attention and was considered helpful, it is now available on the Routing Area wiki. There is a link from http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgADNits That page also shows a list of common (or less common) concerns, and I have just updated it with guidance about how to describe integer protocol fields since I have seen several Discusses from other ADs in the last few weeks. Cheers, Adrian