From exim@www1.ietf.org  Mon Jan 12 10:07:57 2004
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA00492
	for <rpsec-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:07:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
	by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1Ag3f6-00070K-M7
	for rpsec-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:07:29 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost)
	by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0CF7SAp026922
	for rpsec-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:07:28 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
	by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1Ag3f6-000709-Cw
	for rpsec-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:07:28 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA00431
	for <rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:07:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1])
	by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1Ag3f4-0006c6-00
	for rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:07:26 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
	id 1Ag3e5-0006U4-00
	for rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:06:26 -0500
Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com)
	by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1Ag3c4-0006BN-00
	for rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:04:20 -0500
Received: from optimus22.ietf.org ([132.151.6.22] helo=optimus.ietf.org)
	by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Ag3c4-00038o-Q1
	for rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:04:20 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
	by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1Ag3bk-0006Z0-RJ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:04:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
	by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1Ag3bY-0006YR-KF
	for rpsec@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:03:49 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA29547
	for <rpsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:03:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1])
	by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1Ag3bW-00066G-00
	for rpsec@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:03:46 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
	id 1Ag3Z7-0005gW-00
	for rpsec@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:01:19 -0500
Received: from zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.157])
	by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1Ag3WI-00055I-00
	for rpsec@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:58:22 -0500
Received: from zcard309.ca.nortel.com (zcard309.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.69])
	by zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id i0CEvPV28207;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:57:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: by zcard309.ca.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <ZL73C9ZT>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:57:25 -0500
Message-ID: <87609AFB433BD5118D5E0002A52CD75408183A83@zcard0k6.ca.nortel.com>
From: "Abbie Barbir" <abbieb@nortelnetworks.com>
To: rpsec@ietf.org
Cc: Tony Tauber <tony.tauber@level3.com>, riw@cisco.com
Subject: RE: [RPSEC] Summary of editorial changes to  draft-ietf-rpsec-rou
	ting-threats -04
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:57:24 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C3D91C.634A605A"
Sender: rpsec-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: rpsec-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>,
	<mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements  <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>,
	<mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on 
	ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_30_40,
	HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C3D91C.634A605A
Content-Type: text/plain

Chairs,
 
Since we did not get any more feedback on the document, can you please
forward the new version to the IESG.
 
Regards,
 
Abbie Barbir
Nortel Networks

-----Original Message-----
From: Barbir, Abbie [CAR:1A11:EXCH] 
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:05 AM
To: rpsec@ietf.org
Cc: Tony Tauber; riw@cisco.com
Subject: [RPSEC] Summary of editorial changes to
draft-ietf-rpsec-routing-threats -04



All, 

This is a list of changes that were done to the -03 version of the document
to make align with the IESG Feedback. 


1. Aligned definition of threat with RFC 2828 
2. Fixed Blachole definition/consequence 
3. In section 2 , fixed who maintain the state in a routing protocol. 
4. Done editorial changes to Section 3.1.2 to fix Disruption. 
5. Done editorial changes to 4.1 Deliberate Exposure with the references to
other routers 
6. Improved section 4.2 Sniffing 
7. In section 4.5.1.2 Misclaiming added a forward reference to the next
section to clarify other consequence of Misclaiming.

8. Various editorial fixes and spelling. 


In summary, there were only editorial changes to the document with no major
changes to content. 

PS: We need to re-forward the -04 version to IESG ASAP. 

So please recomment on the draft by no Later than January 7th. 


Abbie Barbir 
Nortel Networks 


------_=_NextPart_001_01C3D91C.634A605A
Content-Type: text/html

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN 
class=193135614-12012004>Chairs,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN 
class=193135614-12012004></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=193135614-12012004>Since 
we did not get any more feedback on the document, can you please forward the new 
version to the IESG.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN 
class=193135614-12012004></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN 
class=193135614-12012004>Regards,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN 
class=193135614-12012004></SPAN></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=193135614-12012004>Abbie 
Barbir</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2><SPAN class=193135614-12012004>Nortel 
Networks</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr 
style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV></DIV>
  <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT 
  face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Barbir, Abbie 
  [CAR:1A11:EXCH] <BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December 22, 2003 10:05 
  AM<BR><B>To:</B> rpsec@ietf.org<BR><B>Cc:</B> Tony Tauber; 
  riw@cisco.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> [RPSEC] Summary of editorial changes to 
  draft-ietf-rpsec-routing-threats -04<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
  <P><FONT size=2>All,</FONT> </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>This is a list of changes that were done to the -03 version of 
  the document to make align with the IESG Feedback.</FONT> </P><BR>
  <P><FONT size=2>1. Aligned definition of threat with RFC 2828 </FONT><BR><FONT 
  size=2>2. Fixed Blachole definition/consequence</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>3. In 
  section 2 , fixed who maintain the state in a routing protocol.</FONT> 
  <BR><FONT size=2>4. Done editorial changes to Section 3.1.2 to fix 
  Disruption.</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>5. Done editorial changes to 4.1 
  Deliberate Exposure with the references to other routers</FONT> <BR><FONT 
  size=2>6. Improved section 4.2 Sniffing</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>7. In section 
  4.5.1.2 Misclaiming added a forward reference to the next section to clarify 
  other consequence of Misclaiming.</FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=2>8. Various editorial fixes and spelling.</FONT> </P><BR>
  <P><FONT size=2>In summary, there were only editorial changes to the document 
  with no major changes to content.</FONT> </P>
  <P><FONT size=2>PS: We need to re-forward the -04 version to IESG ASAP. 
  </FONT></P>
  <P><FONT size=2>So please recomment on the draft by no Later than January 
  7th.</FONT> </P><BR>
  <P><FONT size=2>Abbie Barbir</FONT> <BR><FONT size=2>Nortel Networks</FONT> 
  </P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C3D91C.634A605A--

_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec



From exim@www1.ietf.org  Thu Jan 15 20:27:26 2004
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA12385
	for <rpsec-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:27:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
	by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1AhIlG-0000mI-0O
	for rpsec-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:26:58 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost)
	by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0G1QvaQ002985
	for rpsec-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:26:57 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
	by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1AhIlF-0000m4-RU
	for rpsec-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:26:57 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA12361
	for <rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:26:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1])
	by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1AhIlD-0002MD-00
	for rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:26:55 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
	id 1AhIkO-0002IQ-00
	for rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:26:04 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org)
	by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1AhIjU-0002EM-00
	for rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:25:08 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
	by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1AhIjO-0000bZ-MM; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:25:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
	by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1AhIjL-0000ai-2E
	for rpsec@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:24:59 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA12200
	for <rpsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:24:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1])
	by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1AhIjI-0002Cb-00
	for rpsec@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:24:56 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
	id 1AhIiP-000294-00
	for rpsec@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:24:02 -0500
Received: from [63.126.135.16] (helo=mail1.netscreen.com)
	by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1AhIi9-00025B-00
	for rpsec@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:23:45 -0500
Received: from ns-ca.netscreen.com (ns-ca-local [10.100.3.35])
	by mail1.netscreen.com (Switch-3.1.3/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id i0G1NAYa020935;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:23:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by NS-CA with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <CSB2NB48>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:23:10 -0800
Message-ID: <541402FFDC56DA499E7E13329ABFEA8703975BF6@SARATOGA.netscreen.com>
From: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
To: "'Tony Tauber'" <tony.tauber@level3.com>,
        "'rpsec@ietf.org'"
	 <rpsec@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [RPSEC] Consensus calls
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:23:10 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: rpsec-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: rpsec-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>,
	<mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements  <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>,
	<mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on 
	ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

 
> 2) Should the RPSEC charter be amended to allow for the acceptance of
>    protocol-specific work?  (Removing the sentence below 
> should do that.)
> 
>    ++> It is also a non-goal at this point to produce new or 
> change the
>    ++> current security mechanisms in the existing routing protocols.
> 

Yes, but we might want to require that we finish (=WG last call?) the
threats and generic requirements docs first, so that we don't run ahead with
protocol-specific work to the detriment of the foundational work.

My .02,
Gregory. 

_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec



From exim@www1.ietf.org  Thu Jan 15 22:09:31 2004
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA14714
	for <rpsec-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:09:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
	by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1AhKLz-0005Bs-TF
	for rpsec-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:09:04 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost)
	by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0G38x3l019946
	for rpsec-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:08:59 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
	by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1AhKLz-0005Bd-Pc
	for rpsec-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:08:59 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA14700
	for <rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:08:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1])
	by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1AhKLw-00062e-00
	for rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:08:56 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
	id 1AhKL0-00060N-00
	for rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:07:58 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org)
	by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1AhKK9-0005yG-00
	for rpsec-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:07:05 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org)
	by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1AhKK6-0004ki-EW; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:07:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org)
	by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1AhKK2-0004jM-3w
	for rpsec@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:06:58 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1])
	by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA14674
	for <rpsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:06:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1])
	by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1AhKJz-0005xJ-00
	for rpsec@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:06:55 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12)
	id 1AhKJ3-0005vn-00
	for rpsec@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:05:57 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87])
	by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 1AhKIn-0005tl-00
	for rpsec@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:05:42 -0500
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (64.102.124.12)
  by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Jan 2004 19:05:34 -0800
Received: from cisco.com (uzura.cisco.com [64.102.17.77])
	by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0G359LE011224;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:05:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (sjc-vpn1-345.cisco.com [10.21.97.89])
	by cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA02992;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:05:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:05:00 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
From: Russ White <ruwhite@cisco.com>
Reply-To: Russ White <riw@cisco.com>
To: Gregory Lebovitz <Gregory@netscreen.com>
cc: "'Tony Tauber'" <tony.tauber@level3.com>,
        "'rpsec@ietf.org'" <rpsec@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [RPSEC] Consensus calls
In-Reply-To: <541402FFDC56DA499E7E13329ABFEA8703975BF6@SARATOGA.netscreen.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.53.0401152204300.3296@russpc.whitehouse.intra>
References: <541402FFDC56DA499E7E13329ABFEA8703975BF6@SARATOGA.netscreen.com>
X-X-Sender: ruwhite@uzura.cisco.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: rpsec-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: rpsec-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rpsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>,
	<mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Routing Protocol Security Requirements  <rpsec.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:rpsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec>,
	<mailto:rpsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on 
	ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60


> > 2) Should the RPSEC charter be amended to allow for the acceptance of
> >    protocol-specific work?  (Removing the sentence below
> > should do that.)
> >
> >    ++> It is also a non-goal at this point to produce new or
> > change the
> >    ++> current security mechanisms in the existing routing protocols.
>
> Yes, but we might want to require that we finish (=WG last call?) the
> threats and generic requirements docs first, so that we don't run ahead
> with protocol-specific work to the detriment of the foundational work.

That would, of a necessity, be one of the requirements laid in place if we
made this change.

:-)

Russ


__________________________________
riw@cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone



_______________________________________________
RPSEC mailing list
RPSEC@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rpsec