From mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Tue Mar 6 08:45:29 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF8721F8672 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:45:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.169 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.078, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v8YO+c0kGXuW for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:45:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF12921F86B5 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:45:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.1]) by omfedm11.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 1FCA83B4223 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:45:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from PUEXCH61.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.32]) by omfedm05.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 060DD35C09B for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:45:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.12]) by PUEXCH61.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.32]) with mapi; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:45:18 +0100 From: To: "rrg@irtf.org" Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:45:17 +0100 Thread-Topic: CALL FOR BOOK CHAPTERS: Solutions for Sustaining Scalability in Internet Growth Thread-Index: Acz7uILcqwgWEys0SB2SWl0YUYK9iQ== Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36748838306@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> Accept-Language: fr-FR Content-Language: fr-FR X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: fr-FR Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36748838306PUEXCB1Bnante_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.3.6.121218 Cc: BINET David OLNC/NAD/TIP Subject: [rrg] CALL FOR BOOK CHAPTERS: Solutions for Sustaining Scalability in Internet Growth X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:45:29 -0000 --_000_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36748838306PUEXCB1Bnante_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable CALL FOR CHAPTER PROPOSALS Solutions for Sustaining Scalability in Internet Growth A book edited by M. Boucadair and D. Binet Contact: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; david.binet@orange.com France Telecom, France To be published by IGI Global: http://bit.ly/zYWq8y INTRODUCTION Simplicity, flexibility, and extensibility were the main characteristics of the Internet architecture but unfortunately these design principles are not the actual characteristics of the deployed Internet. More precisely, the Internet is suffering from a wide range of complications which may impact its evolution. Some of the following issues alter the growth of Internet while other issues induce more complexity to introduce innovative services at large scale. Examples illustrating encountered complications include: o IPv4 address shortage o Emergence of middleboxes such as CGNs (Carrier Grade NATs), firewalls, CDNs and DPI (Deep Packet Inspection) o Inability to extend or upgrade protocols which are part of Internet foundations such as IP and TCP o Inability to introduce new transport protocols at large o Restriction of reachability to some protocols: only TCP/UDP, and in some cases only HTTP, are accepted. o Brokenness of bi-directional communications because reachability is not symmetric due to the presence of NAT and tunnels (e.g., If "A" can reach "B", this does not mean "B" can reach "A"). The reachability asymmetry is now part of the "new" characteristics of Internet just like path asymmetry. Applications should be designed to live this new constraint- o Brokenness of applications which make wrong assumptions based on the IP address (e.g., Locality, Geoproximity, etc.) o Increase of routing and forwarding tables - Instability of core routing tables induced by few edge networks o Lack of deterministic tools to achieve (inter-domain) inbound traffic engineering: Current practices rely on injecting more specific routes, which exacerbates the growth of inter-domain routing table, or by prepending AS number technique for multi- homed networks, which is not deterministic since it depends on remote ASes in the path and their enforced policies. o Lack of efficient means to support prefix portability for multi- homed or re-homed networks o Prefix hijacking o Rapid shuffling of prefixes o Unbalanced cost and benefit - Development of VPN services in business and mobile environments It is commonly agreed the continuous increase of routing and forwarding tables is a sensitive issue which may question the growth of the overall Internet. Some technical practices, such as multi- homing using Provider Independent (PI) prefixes and shrinking advertised prefixes to support advanced inbound traffic engineering policies, exacerbate the increase of inter-domain routing tables. Designing a scalable, robust, predictable, and stable routing system to sustain the growth of the Internet should be seriously tackled by Internet actors (including IETF, regulatory bodies and IP Connectivity Providers). Particularly, IP Connectivity Providers should undertake concrete actions to anticipate the potential failure of the deployed Internet routing architecture. Because the Internet is de-centralized, introducing new tools won't be shipped overnight. To be successful, this requires the involvement and coordination of several actors. Consequently, deploying these complementary tools may take a long time before being adopted at large, but it should not be considered as a pretext to delay introducing the proposed new schemes, and to cease investigating efficient solutions. If no particular action is conducted to mitigate issues encountered by the Internet routing architecture, serious risks for an emerging, fragmented Internet with non-global reachability will be faced. Routers have to process more and more information and the growth of routing and forwarding tables to be managed may not be satisfied by router technology evolution. Furthermore, such routing capabilities requirements dramatically impact routers' power consumption. Solving all the aforementioned complications can not be easily achieved because of the Internet's anarchical nature (there is no central entity controlling and managing the Internet). Nevertheless, some of these problems can be mitigated owing to an architectural re- design, the deployment of new protocols, and the enforcement of appropriate operational guidelines. OBJECTIVE OF THE BOOK This book aims to offer a comprehensive overview on the recent advances in exploring viable solutions for expanding the scalability limits of the Internet and to mitigate encountered issues. Towards this end, the book solicits new ideas on relevant techniques in management, control, and data planes for deploying a scalable and robust Future Internet. RECOMMENDED TOPICS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: o Issues with current Internet architecture o Hurdles and barriers for introducing innovative services over the Internet o Issues induced by massive deployment of middleboxes and Carrier Grade NAT o Impact of IPv6 introduction strategies on routing architecture design o New routing and forwarding architecture proposals o Solutions review and analysis (e.g., LISP, IRON, hIPv4, Ivip, ILNP) o Optimization studies for Core Edge Separation solutions o Solutions for Core Edge Separation Mapping System o Multi-homing o Dynamic and flexible renumbering o Inter-domain inbound traffic engineering techniques o Prefix portability o Mobility and impact on routing table (e.g., how LISP and/or Ivip can be used for mobility) o Architecture proposals for the design of nodes involved in core networks owing to the use of OPS (Optical Packet Switching), OBS (Optical Burst Switching), etc. o Solution proposals to reduce power consumption in edge and core networks o Solutions to offload routing engine from routers to dedicated nodes o Proposals for compact routing o Review of Inter-domain route aggregation alternatives to the prefix-based schemes o Interconnection agreements and interfaces o Fixed Mobile Convergence and routing issues o Impacts of CDNs deployment on routing schemes o Deployment and emergence of promising services (e.g., M2M, Mobile Data) and new architectures (e.g., Cloud and virtualization) o Internet Business Models SUBMISSION PROCEDURE You are invited to submit to the editors a 2-pages extended abstract on your proposed chapter. Full manuscripts will be invited upon the acceptance decision based on the initial proposals. Second round of review will be performed based on the full manuscripts before their final versions are produced for publishing. All submitted chapters will be reviewed on a double-blind review basis. Contributors may also be requested to serve as reviewers for this project. The initial extended abstract should contain the following information: - Title - Full list of authors with affiliations and contact information - Basic description on the problem(s) to be tackled - Main contributions from the work The first author of each accepted book chapter will get one free copy of the published book. IMPORTANT DATES April 30, 2012: Submission of initial extended abstract May 31, 2012: Notification of acceptance August 31, 2012: Submission of full manuscript September 30, 2012: Review results to authors October 30, 2012: Revised chapter submission November 15, 2012: Final acceptance notifications --_000_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36748838306PUEXCB1Bnante_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
           &nbs= p;            = =20 CALL FOR CHAPTER=20 PROPOSALS
          Solutio= ns=20 for Sustaining Scalability in Internet=20 Growth
           = ;     =20 A book edited by M. Boucadair and D.=20 Binet
       Contact: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; david.binet@orange.com
 =             &nb= sp;            = =20 France Telecom,=20 France
           = ; To=20 be published by IGI Global: http://bit.ly/zYWq8y
 
INTRODUCTION
 
   Simplicity, flexibility, and extensibility were the=20 main
   characteristics of the Internet architecture but=20 unfortunately these
   design principles are not the actual=20 characteristics of the deployed
   Internet.  More precis= ely,=20 the Internet is suffering from a wide
   range of complication= s=20 which may impact its evolution.  Some of the
   following= =20 issues alter the growth of Internet while other issues
   indu= ce=20 more complexity to introduce innovative services at large
  =20 scale.  Examples illustrating encountered complications=20 include:
   o  IPv4 address shortage
   o&nb= sp;=20 Emergence of middleboxes such as CGNs (Carrier Grade=20 NATs),
      firewalls, CDNs and DPI (Deep Pack= et=20 Inspection)
   o  Inability to extend or upgrade protocol= s=20 which are part of
      Internet foundations su= ch as=20 IP and TCP
   o  Inability to introduce new transport=20 protocols at large
   o  Restriction of reachability to s= ome=20 protocols: only TCP/UDP, and
      in some case= s=20 only HTTP, are accepted.
   o  Brokenness of bi-direction= al=20 communications because reachability
      is no= t=20 symmetric due to the presence of NAT and tunnels (e.g.,=20 If
      "A" can reach "B", this does not mean = "B"=20 can reach "A").  The
      reachability=20 asymmetry is now part of the "new" characteristics=20 of
      Internet just like path asymmetry.&nbs= p;=20 Applications should be
      designed to live t= his=20 new constraint-
   o  Brokenness of applications which ma= ke=20 wrong assumptions based on
      the IP address= =20 (e.g., Locality, Geoproximity, etc.)
   o  Increase of ro= uting=20 and forwarding tables - Instability of core
    &nbs= p;=20 routing tables induced by few edge networks
   o  Lack of= =20 deterministic tools to achieve (inter-domain)=20 inbound
      traffic engineering: Current prac= tices=20 rely on injecting more
      specific routes, w= hich=20 exacerbates the growth of inter-domain
      ro= uting=20 table, or by prepending AS number technique for=20 multi-
      homed networks, which is not=20 deterministic since it depends on
      remote = ASes=20 in the path and their enforced policies.
   o  Lack of=20 efficient means to support prefix portability for=20 multi-
      homed or re-homed=20 networks
   o  Prefix hijacking
   o  R= apid=20 shuffling of prefixes
   o  Unbalanced cost and benefit -= =20 Development of VPN services in
      business a= nd=20 mobile environments
 
   It is commonly agreed the continuous increase of routing= =20 and
   forwarding tables is a sensitive issue which may questi= on=20 the growth
   of the overall Internet.  Some technical=20 practices, such as multi-
   homing using Provider Independent= (PI)=20 prefixes and shrinking
   advertised prefixes to support advan= ced=20 inbound traffic engineering
   policies, exacerbate the increa= se of=20 inter-domain routing tables.
   Designing a scalable, robust,= =20 predictable, and stable routing system
   to sustain the growt= h of=20 the Internet should be seriously tackled by
   Internet actors= =20 (including IETF, regulatory bodies and IP
   Connectivity=20 Providers).  Particularly, IP Connectivity Providers
   s= hould=20 undertake concrete actions to anticipate the potential failure
 &nb= sp;=20 of the deployed Internet routing architecture.  Because the=20 Internet
   is de-centralized, introducing new tools won't be= =20 shipped overnight.
   To be successful, this requires the=20 involvement and coordination of
   several actors. =20 Consequently, deploying these complementary tools
   may take = a=20 long time before being adopted at large, but it should not
   = be=20 considered as a pretext to delay introducing the proposed new
 &nbs= p;=20 schemes, and to cease investigating efficient solutions.  If=20 no
   particular action is conducted to mitigate issues encoun= tered=20 by the
   Internet routing architecture, serious risks for an= =20 emerging,
   fragmented Internet with non-global reachability = will=20 be faced.
   Routers have to process more and more information= and=20 the growth of
   routing and forwarding tables to be managed m= ay=20 not be satisfied by
   router technology evolution. =20 Furthermore, such routing capabilities
   requirements dramati= cally=20 impact routers' power consumption.
 
   Solving all the aforementioned complications can not be=20 easily
   achieved because of the Internet's anarchical nature= =20 (there is no
   central entity controlling and managing the=20 Internet).  Nevertheless,
   some of these problems can b= e=20 mitigated owing to an architectural re-
   design, the deploym= ent=20 of new protocols, and the enforcement of
   appropriate operat= ional=20 guidelines.
 
OBJECTIVE OF THE BOOK
 
   This book aims to offer a comprehensive overview on the=20 recent
   advances in exploring viable solutions for expanding= the=20 scalability
   limits of the Internet and to mitigate encounte= red=20 issues.  Towards
   this end, the book solicits new ideas= on=20 relevant techniques in
   management, control, and data planes= for=20 deploying a scalable and
   robust Future Internet.
 
RECOMMENDED TOPICS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING:
 
   o  Issues with current Internet=20 architecture
   o  Hurdles and barriers for introducing=20 innovative services over the
     =20 Internet
   o  Issues induced by massive deployment of=20 middleboxes and Carrier
      Grade=20 NAT
   o  Impact of IPv6 introduction strategies on routi= ng=20 architecture
      design
   o&nbs= p;=20 New routing and forwarding architecture proposals
   o =20 Solutions review and analysis (e.g., LISP, IRON, hIPv4,=20 Ivip,
      ILNP)
   o =20 Optimization studies for Core Edge Separation solutions
   o&n= bsp;=20 Solutions for Core Edge Separation Mapping System
   o =20 Multi-homing
   o  Dynamic and flexible=20 renumbering
   o  Inter-domain inbound traffic engineerin= g=20 techniques
   o  Prefix portability
   o&nbs= p;=20 Mobility and impact on routing table (e.g., how LISP and/or=20 Ivip
      can be used for mobility)
 &= nbsp;=20 o  Architecture proposals for the design of nodes involved in=20 core
      networks owing to the use of OPS (Op= tical=20 Packet Switching), OBS
      (Optical Burst=20 Switching), etc.
   o  Solution proposals to reduce power= =20 consumption in edge and core
     =20 networks
   o  Solutions to offload routing engine from=20 routers to dedicated
      nodes
  = ;=20 o  Proposals for compact routing
   o  Review of=20 Inter-domain route aggregation alternatives to=20 the
      prefix-based schemes
  = =20 o  Interconnection agreements and interfaces
   o  F= ixed=20 Mobile Convergence and routing issues
   o  Impacts of CD= Ns=20 deployment on routing schemes
   o  Deployment and emerge= nce=20 of promising services (e.g., M2M, Mobile
      = Data)=20 and new architectures (e.g., Cloud and virtualization)
   o&nb= sp;=20 Internet Business Models
 
SUBMISSION PROCEDURE
 
   You are invited to submit to the editors a 2-pages extend= ed=20 abstract
   on your proposed chapter.  Full manuscripts w= ill=20 be invited upon the
   acceptance decision based on the initia= l=20 proposals.  Second round of
   review will be performed b= ased=20 on the full manuscripts before their
   final versions are pro= duced=20 for publishing.  All submitted chapters
   will be review= ed on=20 a double-blind review basis.  Contributors may
   also be= =20 requested to serve as reviewers for this project.  The
  = =20 initial extended abstract should contain the following information:
 
   - Title
   - Full list of authors with=20 affiliations and contact information
   - Basic description on= the=20 problem(s) to be tackled
   - Main contributions from the=20 work
 
   The first author of each accepted book chapter will get o= ne=20 free copy
   of the published book.
 
IMPORTANT DATES
 
   April 30, 2012:     Submission of ini= tial=20 extended abstract
   May 31,=20 2012:       Notification of=20 acceptance
   August 31, 2012:    Submission of= full=20 manuscript
   September 30, 2012: Review results to=20 authors
   October 30, 2012:   Revised chapter=20 submission
   November 15, 2012:  Final acceptance=20 notifications
--_000_94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36748838306PUEXCB1Bnante_-- From lei.liu16@gmail.com Sat Mar 10 07:39:16 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE9421F8628 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:39:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.525 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.525 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.073, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NdmsSa6hv5LS for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:39:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C392221F8621 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:39:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-iy0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k25so5108962iah.13 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:39:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; bh=9ixhiWukncF9kP9TdiCz02gUa/JA4Ct3MSNa/7a3YbE=; b=duQKs7WtGlIBImZOsasHycznSzpUJzTmjYJRDtuP+Ynd/J1RB6tQc71eP8x27IW/q2 eSqafvMGcBrPXUWxs3f8fL8M+nTcXYjBGnyUlzIIMen/R9LjxMJCcqeelID8edTDWAoG xF7Z5SK9wUWu5DSB6rWH5zA7G1n9bNA+lxImYd9xb26QJui6aNbSJSx8nzR6Z69qBE1t UMDQ9akX/Zx35vhtXv3e2xLtuNfMDyyNKx1A7XmsvWEcyx8FSvxSgIqTGw/q6mQ5bi0F QjiS+ar/UoiyrkS1gqg/lWrxxjiCGhsjaEwC5aazOYnoFYwu4ArJSdKp2+sGNsMjH7XU 9yBw== Received: by 10.50.194.233 with SMTP id hz9mr10190778igc.11.1331393955664; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:39:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ChrisTHINK ([222.175.103.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c2sm5743317igj.1.2012.03.10.07.39.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:39:15 -0800 (PST) From: "Chris-Lei.Liu" To: Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:37:53 +0800 Message-ID: <007d01ccfed3$f5a668a0$e0f339e0$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007E_01CCFF17.03CC8ED0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Acz+07/La3jBfnX7Tq2hclzqr/JOEQ== Content-Language: zh-cn Subject: [rrg] CFP::The International Symposium on Frontier of Future Communication Networks, Liverpool, UK, deadline=30 March 2012 X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:39:16 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_007E_01CCFF17.03CC8ED0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [Please accept our sincere apologies if you receive multiple copies of this email] ************************ FFCN-2012 CFP *********************** The International Symposium on Frontier of Future Communication Networks (FFCN-2012) to be held in conjunction with The 14th IEEE International Conference on High Performance computing and communications (HPCC-2012), in Liverpool, UK. http://www.lrm.sdu.edu.cn/ffcn2012.html Introduction ================ The demand of next generation networks for communications has focused on the trend in technology and the efficiency. Driven by the fancy technologies and the applications, the provisioning of large-scaled and complicated communication networks is becoming an important research issue. Especially over the last few years, there has been an explosion of wireless subscribers and booming growth in the Internet both in terms of users and usage. The trend has led to a new direction, and meanwhile brought many grand challenges to both industrial and academic communication communities. To overcome these challenges, it is necessary to seek new levels of research work on architecture, green networking, performance, and intelligence of future communication networks. All papers will be peer-reviewed and the comments will be provided to the authors. All accepted papers will be included in the proceedings of the main conference IUCC 2012, published by IEEE Computer Society Press (Indexed by EI). At least one author of any accepted paper is requested to register at the main conference. Once accepted, the paper will be included into the IEEE conference proceedings published by IEEE Computer Society Press (indexed by EI). The purpose the 2012 International Symposium on Frontier of Future Communication Networks is to bring together scientists, researchers, professionals, and practitioners from both industry and academia to share the opinions, seek the solutions, and report state-of-art research results. Scope and Topics: ================= -Ad Hoc Networks and Sensor Networks -Social Networks: Architecture, Theories and Technologies -Perspective of Cognitive Networks and Development -Applications and Technologies of Mobile Networks -Systems, Architecture and Standardizations of Internet of Things -Performance, Modelling, Analysis and Optimization of Computer Networking -Design and Development of IPv6 -Challenges and Issues of Bio-Networks -Applications, Theories and Utilizations of Biomimicry Networks Important Dates ================== Paper submission deadline: March 30, 2012 Author notification: April 30, 2012 Final manuscript due: May 08, 2012 Registration due: May 08, 2012 Conference date: June 25-27, 2012 Submission Instructions ======================= Authors are invited to submit manuscripts reporting original unpublished research and recent developments in the topics related to the workshop. The length of the papers should not exceed 6 pages + 2 pages for overlength charges (IEEE Computer Society Proceedings Manuscripts style: two columns, single-spaced), including figures and references, using 10pt fonts, and number each page. Papers should be submitted electronically in PDF format by sending it as an e-mail attachment to Lei Liu (lei.liu16@gmail.com). ------=_NextPart_000_007E_01CCFF17.03CC8ED0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[Please accept our sincere apologies if you receive = multiple copies of this email]

 

************************ FFCN-2012 CFP = ***********************

The International Symposium on Frontier of Future = Communication Networks (FFCN-2012) to be held in conjunction with The = 14th IEEE International Conference on High Performance computing and = communications (HPCC-2012), in Liverpool, UK.

 

http://www.lrm.sdu.edu.cn/ffcn2012.html

 

Introduction

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

<= p class=3DMsoNormal = style=3D'margin-bottom:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;line-height:normal'> 

The = demand of next generation networks for communications has focused on the = trend in technology and the efficiency. Driven by the fancy technologies = and the applications, the provisioning of large-scaled and complicated = communication networks is becoming an important research issue. = Especially over the last few years, there has been an explosion of = wireless subscribers and booming growth in the Internet both in terms of = users and usage.  The trend has led to a new direction, and = meanwhile brought many grand challenges to both industrial and academic = communication communities. To overcome these challenges, it is necessary = to seek new levels of research work on architecture, green networking, = performance, and intelligence of future communication networks. All = papers will be peer-reviewed and the comments will be provided to the = authors. All accepted papers will be included in the proceedings of the = main conference IUCC 2012, published by IEEE Computer Society Press = (Indexed by EI). At least one author of any accepted paper is = requested to register at the main conference. Once accepted, the paper = will be included into the IEEE conference proceedings published by IEEE = Computer Society Press (indexed by EI).

 

 

The = purpose the 2012 International Symposium on Frontier of Future = Communication Networks is to bring together scientists, researchers, = professionals, and practitioners from both industry and academia to = share the opinions, seek the solutions, and report state-of-art research = results.

 

Scope and Topics:

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

 

-Ad Hoc Networks and Sensor Networks

-Social Networks: Architecture, Theories and = Technologies

-Perspective of Cognitive Networks and = Development

-Applications and Technologies of Mobile = Networks

-Systems, Architecture and Standardizations of Internet = of Things

-Performance, Modelling, Analysis and Optimization of = Computer Networking 

-Design and Development of IPv6

-Challenges and Issues of Bio-Networks

-Applications, Theories and Utilizations of Biomimicry = Networks

 

Important Dates

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

 

Paper submission = deadline:        March 30, = 2012

Author = notification:          =             &= nbsp; April 30, 2012

Final manuscript = due:           &nb= sp;         May 08, = 2012

Registration = due:           &nb= sp;           &nbs= p;     May 08, 2012

Conference = date:           &n= bsp;           &nb= sp;    June 25-27, 2012

 

Submission Instructions

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D

 

Authors = are invited to submit manuscripts reporting original unpublished = research and recent developments in the topics related to the workshop. = The length of the papers should not exceed 6 pages + 2 pages for = overlength charges (IEEE Computer Society Proceedings Manuscripts style: = two columns, single-spaced), including figures and references, using = 10pt fonts, and number each page. Papers should be submitted = electronically in PDF format by sending it as an e-mail attachment to = Lei Liu (lei.liu16@gmail.com).

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_007E_01CCFF17.03CC8ED0-- From wanglijun@cernet.edu.cn Tue Mar 20 00:33:39 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C3321F8806 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:33:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -94.947 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-94.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.667, BAYES_99=3.5, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jqZ30ls7UONh for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cernet.edu.cn (sea.net.edu.cn [202.112.39.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE3821F87FD for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:33:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Wang (unknown [101.5.195.114]) by centos (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf3ArdwWlMGhP_4wSAA--.8335S2; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:24:21 +0800 (CST) From: "Wang Lijun" To: References: <007d01ccfed3$f5a668a0$e0f339e0$@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:27:35 +0800 Message-ID: <4F3213A150CA49A08B89E1C41C997623@Wang> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000C_01CD06AD.F9ECFFA0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Acz+07/La3jBfnX7Tq2hclzqr/JOEQHlyXGA In-Reply-To: <007d01ccfed3$f5a668a0$e0f339e0$@gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf3ArdwWlMGhP_4wSAA--.8335S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUU5h7k0a2IF6F1UM7kC6x804xWl14x267AK xVWUJVW8JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGw A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_ Cr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr 0_Cr1UM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVAqjxCE14ACF2xKxwAqx4xG6xAI xVCFxsxG0wAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUGVWUXwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6x CaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4xvF2IE5I8CrVACzxC2rs4l42xK82IY c2Ij64vIr41lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUGVWUWwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zV AF1VAY17CE14v26r1j6r15MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4l IxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVW8JVW3Jw CI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UYxBIdaVF xhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0zRjQ6JUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: pzdqwzhlmx0qxfhu0vvwohv3gofq/ Subject: [rrg] unsubscribe X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 07:33:40 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01CD06AD.F9ECFFA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit unsubscribe ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01CD06AD.F9ECFFA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable unsubscribe ------=_NextPart_000_000C_01CD06AD.F9ECFFA0-- From rja.lists@gmail.com Mon Mar 26 13:07:06 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6821521E80E1 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:07:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.205 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.205 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.405, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bYBOFvId01wk for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (mail-qa0-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40D121E809C for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qatm19 with SMTP id m19so2636216qat.13 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:07:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:date:subject:to :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=1wV1bVI5XKafeQxxVj3AqnydnBO+dWZU3lqu7fLjN40=; b=XL6pKmbypeakYeRfHpjHOMm7PjWWHZ6FR6T4+zPGiqsWmHbdZePiQbj1mqjeGLO3eU IWoeD643GXrfOn6SfOExBYX1gveFny6h1gdkT1kTzFQaFnZiuexAhv/tB4TDWeT89e2k TjRmOL/QRjWmyXnV/7oCOlgGOsVkGoHLiO7GaIUSxMNWfNW0LRAtIVeUFY4r8BqQKHqT kBz+CAKc75/wnBc67DyRDvIre+LCNhUpDMAI8aREfzfZLrXT+6Mz46TOyZfDYHo53FWm 7hb/Ym9877Cg4Pavmt9hxAH8wGjcbacgQoiP0HoEqAGvkAPCaHXNlEWjwUpfmxV7f8Ut +5sw== Received: by 10.224.9.141 with SMTP id l13mr29308979qal.52.1332792424964; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:07:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.30.20.12] (pool-96-225-134-175.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [96.225.134.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x4sm26535980qaa.22.2012.03.26.13.07.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:07:02 -0700 (PDT) From: RJ Atkinson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:07:01 -0400 To: IRTF Routing RG Message-Id: <05D4E35B-44E3-47AE-893E-CD4D27C3547B@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Subject: [rrg] Revised ILNP I-Ds posted X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 20:07:06 -0000 IRTF RG folks, Now that the I-D submission tools are re-opened, I have just uploaded revisions of the ILNP I-D set: draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-adv-01.txt draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-arch-01.txt draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-dns-01.txt draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-eng-01.txt draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-icmpv4-01.txt draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-icmpv6-01.txt draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-noncev6-01.txt draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-v4opts-01.txt Saleem and I believe that we have addressed all of the received comments (both on-list and private) in these revised I-Ds. Yours, Ran Atkinson PS: The online IETF Tools web server includes a tool for providing differences between two files in various formats at this URL: From tony.li@tony.li Tue Mar 27 08:51:51 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0769B21E8253 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:51:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.077 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.277, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f9jqVjYoTe7t for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CE021E8257 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id qfXF1i00517dt5G5DfrkVh; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:51:44 +0000 Received: from [10.21.76.127] ([128.107.239.233]) by omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id qfrY1i00S52qHCY3Zfrbag; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:51:42 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) From: Tony Li In-Reply-To: <05D4E35B-44E3-47AE-893E-CD4D27C3547B@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:51:31 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <05D4E35B-44E3-47AE-893E-CD4D27C3547B@gmail.com> To: RJ Atkinson , IRTF Routing RG X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Subject: Re: [rrg] Revised ILNP I-Ds posted X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:51:51 -0000 Hi all, The ILNP drafts now seem to be available. Could the folks who have outstanding comments on these drafts please = either provide further comments or approval? By my records that would be: Wes George Steven Blake Joel Halpern We will not be advancing the documents until we receive approvals from = all of these folks. Thanks, Tony On Mar 26, 2012, at 1:07 PM, RJ Atkinson wrote: > IRTF RG folks, >=20 > Now that the I-D submission tools are re-opened, > I have just uploaded revisions of the ILNP I-D set: > draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-adv-01.txt > draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-arch-01.txt > draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-dns-01.txt > draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-eng-01.txt > draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-icmpv4-01.txt > draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-icmpv6-01.txt > draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-noncev6-01.txt > draft-irtf-rrg-ilnp-v4opts-01.txt >=20 > Saleem and I believe that we have addressed all of > the received comments (both on-list and private)=20 > in these revised I-Ds. >=20 > Yours, >=20 > Ran Atkinson >=20 > PS: The online IETF Tools web server includes a tool for > providing differences between two files in various > formats at this URL: =20 > >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > rrg mailing list > rrg@irtf.org > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg