Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-07.txt - Comment on section 6 title

From: Michael Tuexen <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 12:22:40 +0000

On 12 Feb 2014, at 18:56, Makaraju, Maridi Raju (Raju) <[email-masked]> wrote:

>> Hi,
>> 
>>> I suggest that this just be called "Data Channel", not "WebRTC Data
>> Channel". (Or pick some other neutral name - perhaps SCTP Data Channel.)
>> 
>> Agree. A more generic name would be useful.
>> 
>> "Simple Data Channel"
>> "Simple SCTP Data Channel"
>> Etc...
> 
> [Raju] How about "Application Data Channel"?
What about:
"The Usage of SCTP for Data Channels"

Best regards
Michael
> 
>> (But it would still make sense for the JS API to have a WebRTC-specific name.)
> +1
> 
> -raju
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>