Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WG call for adoption: draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return

From: Sean Turner <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 11:33:31 -0400

All,

Based on messages to the list we’re going to adopt this draft as a WG item.

Authors,

Please submit a WG version of the draft when you have a chance.

spt

On Apr 16, 2015, at 14:16, Sean Turner <[email-masked]> wrote:

> All,
> 
> There’s been some interest expressed in having http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schwartz-rtcweb-return/ adopted as an RTCWeb WG item.  Please respond to say whether you support adoption of this work as a working group work item and whether you will participate in the discussion.   If you are opposed to this draft becoming a WG document, please say so (and say why).  Please have your response in by 20150423 23:59 UTC.
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> spt
> 
> PS - For the casual lurker, there was some vigorous discussion in Dallas on the -05 version but based on the [1] thread and the -06 version it looks like we’re in much better shape.
> 
> [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg14402.html
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb