Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp - Christer's review

From: Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 11:55:45 +0000

Hi,

Here are my comments:

Q1: Regarding the ICE attributes (non-trickle), I think the draft shall reference draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp.

Q2: I think the examples shall include the 'ice2' ice-options value (defined in RFC 8445), to indicate that aggressive nomination is not supported.

Yes, this again brings up the what-ICE-version-to-reference-question. All the other ICE related drafts in the examples reference (directly or indirectly) RFC 8445.

Regards,

Christer

-----Original Message-----
From: rtcweb [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Sean Turner
Sent: 26 July 2018 21:10
To: RTCWeb IETF <[email-masked]>
Subject: [rtcweb] WGLC for draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp

All,

This is the working group last call for the "Annotated Example SDP for WebRTC" draft available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-sdp/.  Please review the document and send your comments to the list by 2359 UTC on 17 August 2018.

Thanks - spt
_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb