From nobody Mon Sep 21 11:02:33 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55BD1ACE35; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:02:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.012 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ht9kJbeWfxqM; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [64.71.170.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 671891ACE2C; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:02:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lucidvision.com; s=default; t=1442858467; bh=S76LMTmJiyP4Ehk51eyj9tPBWJgHYO9G4RTI12DNBgs=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=GK042UlYvCmt24d1xiJx2GFGL3SRbeNogTxG1VbJ+jTdQeaZoT6gbtpgNv2LcUw2c 46IpY+xfqMCOGriArQNe322OELEJaKUF71RqsKNqrb1EBHLVl1vyUOt0gFbegQfCKX rg16z0/oK+i+8lrjX0/aViM4/oZhNNAj5y/Jg8BQ= X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=144.49.132.3; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Nadeau Thomas In-Reply-To: <20150921061434.GA10606@elstar.local> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 08:57:19 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330053960BF@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20150921061434.GA10606@elstar.local> To: Juergen Schoenwaelder X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-Authenticated-User: tnadeau@lucidvision.com X-Info: aspam skipped due to (g_smite_skip_relay) X-Encryption: SSL encrypted X-MyRbl: Color=Yellow Age=0 Spam=0 Notspam=1 Stars=0 Good=0 Friend=2 Surbl=0 Catch=0 r=0 ip=144.49.132.3 X-IP-stats: Notspam Incoming Last 0, First 104, in=21, out=0, spam=0 Known=true ip=144.49.132.3 Archived-At: Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org, Suresh Kumar Vinapamula Venkata , "Senthil Sivakumar \(ssenthil\)" , mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] NETMOD: A YANG module for NAT X-BeenThere: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "\"List to discuss coordination between the Routing related YANG models\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:02:32 -0000 I=E2=80=99d also copy the routing coordination group who can = help as this is =E2=80=9Ca routing thing=E2=80=9D. =E2=80=94Tom > On Sep 20, 2015:11:14 PM, at 11:14 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder = wrote: >=20 > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 05:44:42AM +0000, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com = wrote: >> Hi Jurguen, >>=20 >> We prepared a draft to specify a YANG module that covers various NAT = flavors (NAT44, NAT64): = https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-03 >>=20 >> As there is no home for this work (behave wg closed), I wonder = whether this effort can be hosted in netmod as I read the following in = the charter: >>=20 >> " >> The NETMOD WG may also develop any additional data models written in = YANG that the WG considers core building blocks and that do not fall = under the charters of other active IETF working groups. The NETMOD WG = may simply add such milestones as it sees fit, with the advice and = consent of the responsible AD. >> " >>=20 >=20 > You are welcome to send a pointer to the NETMOD WG list so that people > are aware that this work out there. Whether NETMOD is the right place > I can't tell at the moment. The other obvious choice would be TSVWG. > The key is to get a sufficient number of people with NAT > implementation experience to review this. I am CC'ing my response to > the other NETMOD co-chairs (since I am leaving and hence they will > have to take responsibility should this work be done in NETMOD). >=20 > /js >=20 > --=20 > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 From nobody Mon Sep 21 11:02:59 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: rtg-yang-coord@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C3B1ACE5B; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:02:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.012 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y2fN5BuojCup; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [64.71.170.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E34D1ACE5A; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:02:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lucidvision.com; s=default; t=1442858494; bh=S76LMTmJiyP4Ehk51eyj9tPBWJgHYO9G4RTI12DNBgs=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=ExcC+2YqNNsv9CER4n3qOXE+KLPcKS2+ttYhLhjTxPR0eFxOIqPv75nKcXEH0HSVL BO+bw24q95et3h3p+kTWxJTseEwygNPynnL037sbVZ3dZ+OG65iKDyizcwAEAkaR3Z PRGQPpv+O0bGTT8GOc9HdGQGdihdiTK3gpOroWfE= X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=144.49.132.3; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Nadeau Thomas In-Reply-To: <20150921061434.GA10606@elstar.local> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:02:56 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5890FCBC-C4EF-422D-BC9C-0BF4B9CBED7C@lucidvision.com> References: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330053960BF@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20150921061434.GA10606@elstar.local> To: Juergen Schoenwaelder X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-Authenticated-User: tnadeau@lucidvision.com X-Info: aspam skipped due to (g_smite_skip_relay) X-Encryption: SSL encrypted X-MyRbl: Color=Yellow Age=0 Spam=0 Notspam=2 Stars=0 Good=0 Friend=2 Surbl=0 Catch=0 r=0 ip=144.49.132.3 X-IP-stats: Notspam Incoming Last 0, First 104, in=22, out=0, spam=0 Known=true ip=144.49.132.3 Archived-At: Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org, Suresh Kumar Vinapamula Venkata , "Senthil Sivakumar \(ssenthil\)" , mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] NETMOD: A YANG module for NAT X-BeenThere: rtg-yang-coord@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "\"List to discuss coordination between the Routing related YANG models\"" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:02:58 -0000 I=E2=80=99d also copy the routing coordination group who can = help as this is =E2=80=9Ca routing thing=E2=80=9D. =E2=80=94Tom > On Sep 20, 2015:11:14 PM, at 11:14 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder = wrote: >=20 > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 05:44:42AM +0000, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com = wrote: >> Hi Jurguen, >>=20 >> We prepared a draft to specify a YANG module that covers various NAT = flavors (NAT44, NAT64): = https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sivakumar-yang-nat-03 >>=20 >> As there is no home for this work (behave wg closed), I wonder = whether this effort can be hosted in netmod as I read the following in = the charter: >>=20 >> " >> The NETMOD WG may also develop any additional data models written in = YANG that the WG considers core building blocks and that do not fall = under the charters of other active IETF working groups. The NETMOD WG = may simply add such milestones as it sees fit, with the advice and = consent of the responsible AD. >> " >>=20 >=20 > You are welcome to send a pointer to the NETMOD WG list so that people > are aware that this work out there. Whether NETMOD is the right place > I can't tell at the moment. The other obvious choice would be TSVWG. > The key is to get a sufficient number of people with NAT > implementation experience to review this. I am CC'ing my response to > the other NETMOD co-chairs (since I am leaving and hence they will > have to take responsibility should this work be done in NETMOD). >=20 > /js >=20 > --=20 > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103