Subject: [Rucus] Feedback on charter proposal

From: "Jan Seedorf" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:42:07 +0200

Dear all,

I posted an updated charter proposal for RUCUS on this list, taking into account many discussions on this list and on the topic of unsolicited communications in the IETF from the past. The idea was to find consensus on how to move forward and to discuss this on this list. After all, the BoF in Philadelphia showed considerable interest in an EG.

So far, I have not seen any feedback on this list, which lets me think there are two possibilities:
A) People have nothing to complain about the charter proposal and think it goes in the right direction
B) Folks are thinking the proposal is so bad that it is not worth answering to or they do not care about RUCUS anymore

Of course, there is also option C) that people are realy busy with other things, which is understandable.

My experience on IETF mailing lists is that if people do not like something they reply immediately saying so :) This makes me think that people tend to option A). If so, it would still be helpful if they could state so on this list so that this is visible and that the people responsible in the IETF for granting an EG could see that there is (still) interest in the community on forming an EG on the topic and agreement on achievable goals.

Let me know what you think,
Kind regards,
Jan

============================================================
Jan Seedorf
Research Scientist
NEC Europe Ltd., NEC Laboratories Europe, Network Division	
Kurfuerstenanlage 36, D-69115 Heidelberg
Tel.     +49 (0)6221 4342-221
Fax:     +49 (0)6221 4342-155
e-mail:  [email-masked] 
============================================================
NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House,
1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014 
_______________________________________________
Rucus mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rucus