From nobody Wed Jun 11 09:16:52 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BB51B27D1; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:16:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i_TjT4GdWa8e; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600A11B27B9; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:16:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: jianping@cernet.edu.cn, fred@cisco.com, junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn, yaoguang@cernet.edu.cn X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.5.0.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140611161646.21610.40633.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:16:46 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/savi/ZixJgiVYpJQicWLWlbZfoUrXZyQ Cc: brian@innovationslab.net, savi@ietf.org, ted.lemon@nominum.com, ipr-announce@ietf.org, jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com Subject: [savi] IPR Disclosure: Cisco's Statement of IPR Related to draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-26 X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:16:48 -0000 Dear Jianping Wu, Fred Baker, Jun Bi, Guang Yao: An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "SAVI Solution for DHCP" (draft-ietf-savi-dhcp) was submitted to the IETF Secretariat on 2014-06-11 and has been posted on the "IETF Page of Intellectual Property Rights Disclosures" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2373/). The title of the IPR disclosure is "Cisco's Statement of IPR Related to draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-26.""); The IETF Secretariat From nobody Wed Jun 18 06:40:14 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907621A0257 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 06:40:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V5IKVdo68LyC for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 06:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E5B21A01E8 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 06:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u56so890592wes.36 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 06:40:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fDC5GcIX5AVM2TVK91UbB/PDy3BiPT+z0+ZvSDLk1GA=; b=u0IUpr1RKwBFqMv5dXa2rnS08v8EEvF5ezxLZ3PqPPqTm9+x03bd2mjmf0he8c3oyC 1B45/sIG84dRIZh42lHxkKsbKYlg3rj+OFBI7i/O5bIFTEDKSaFZvLRiQG30LEnmE8Ai RXfdK1x5yAL2PRx9l3x4oQCf41FyoLTW3TculOuqDPNQUe1kGqHaHmTYkYKZlgPsEVJt KKu/P2qNoWSDn4WtJlbQPasDSYF6qFCUH8X7lg9hJDN1JT3mZMLvfjpRYjDKfK/fsQ1f DC5GoUA3QJPzjNTvq6/snq5b9Lp1sKVH6UQjbbJNmsTIikcitsFK0YlaHBHRdtaidj+Z 0GjQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.74.9 with SMTP id p9mr5083260wiv.39.1403098809729; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 06:40:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.87.77 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 06:40:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:40:09 +0200 Message-ID: From: Jean-Michel Combes To: SAVI Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c81aa238a6504fc1c668c Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/savi/qbAcC7ypQXk9o-fxQX6EdjnDXfM Subject: [savi] DHCP SAVI: new WGLC X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:40:12 -0000 --f46d043c81aa238a6504fc1c668c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Folks, As you may have noticed, there was an IPR disclosure about the DHCP SAVI document (cf. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/savi/current/msg01918.html). If you have any concerns about the standardization of this document as RFC (Proposed Standard), please, inform the WG. BTW, this is a new chance for any technical comments too. This WGLC will end the 2014-07-02. Thanks in advance for your replies. Best regards, JMC. --f46d043c81aa238a6504fc1c668c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Folks,

As you may ha= ve noticed, there was an IPR disclosure about the DHCP SAVI document (cf. <= a href=3D"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/savi/current/msg01918.html">= http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/savi/current/msg01918.html).

If you have any concerns about the standardization of this docume= nt as RFC (Proposed Standard), please, inform the WG.

BTW, thi= s is a new chance for any technical comments too.

This WG= LC will end the 2014-07-02.

Thanks in advance for your replies.

Best = regards,

JMC.
--f46d043c81aa238a6504fc1c668c-- From nobody Wed Jun 18 07:57:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5333B1A003A for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 07:57:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -115.152 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VxijS2EVQ6S0 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 07:57:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E513E1A0021 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 07:57:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1365; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1403103471; x=1404313071; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=AgNWCieMclH4C9HBbYu0RUbGQ9nYPB1cG5Zpdzzxypg=; b=l81vDNSXA9bv1F8/9hWLoWf8udP+FJfHF9XT/utVerBdTECLd36oIWrP GG7Y+vUXi5qfysD/aOEydBwvnx/vVfDvsIcvXeWwSdlZG2mmJPyWsYPrO j0cfwDUPq28F6yE3B2lvzsHZg9OPe1NF5uDcWFoGuylRybBytwWIptbIZ E=; X-Files: signature.asc : 195 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmAFAL+ooVOtJA2K/2dsb2JhbABagw2BLMNHAYEJFnWEAwEBAQMBeQULAgEIDjgyJQIEDgUOiCwIzHYXjnUHgy2BFgEDhGMCjRuBQIcDk1iDQoIw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,501,1400025600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="54092672" Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2014 14:57:50 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com [173.36.12.75]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5IEvoNB029577 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:57:50 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.143]) by xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com ([173.36.12.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:57:49 -0500 From: "Fred Baker (fred)" To: Ted Lemon Thread-Topic: [savi] WGLC: draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-22 Thread-Index: AQHPiwWsA8idP/sl1kyl9/n88IDQdQ== Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:57:49 +0000 Message-ID: <093F4B34-0B4B-478B-A8EE-9D3C64CB5D74@cisco.com> References: <52D2BDC7-9E55-43BC-8248-23C43DCDEF96@fugue.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.21.78.105] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_019AECB5-E128-47F6-BA36-5AA4DA1F8F67"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/savi/m33cS_Eu_JgWXLZUUUgFTqguFCc Cc: "Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)" , SAVI Mailing List , "draft-ietf-savi-dhcp@tools.ietf.org" , Jean-Michel Combes , Guang Yao Subject: Re: [savi] WGLC: draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-22 X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:57:52 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_019AECB5-E128-47F6-BA36-5AA4DA1F8F67 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Apr 23, 2014, at 8:31 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: > BTW, I am reluctant to weigh in on this question because I don't think = there's energy to do this work.=20 Personally, since the products have been in the field since 2003 and = come from a number of manufacturers (ask Google about =93IP Source = Guard=94 for the western manufacturers; there are several Chinese = manufacturers as well), I find the entire re-engineering effort here = pointless. We started out to document the behavior of product in the = field and say =93do that for IPv6 too=94, and have spent the past seven = years debating it. I would like to bring the process to closure. --Apple-Mail=_019AECB5-E128-47F6-BA36-5AA4DA1F8F67 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFToajrbjEdbHIsm0MRAr+QAKCs61qlslmcvuLv3QgFPYeMjv3J5gCg/L6v x7JNrZLRO3bjY7yFNdHUl9Y= =UvWD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_019AECB5-E128-47F6-BA36-5AA4DA1F8F67-- From nobody Wed Jun 18 08:01:36 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519DE1A027A for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:01:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -115.152 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ufjf2vdwY1RB for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043C81A0021 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:01:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1491; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1403103691; x=1404313291; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=pAvEmu8777oYju0ektkymevet8hOJSZ7cICjVDrqfGg=; b=FMEk/DwpanK8Z7/ezYc+fw5RNDeQ67D6WamopNKML/WheITrDusp52hg uZ2CRoTSvIJQTPypw0T2faWYLvxolPPy9BtGkDF3Q2p7kL8osz5a78HRs qfPj4upl29FlTvgaK+0JmHZ20VT+a4ZInoacfIoMu0fUS47E2cF8JfKTm c=; X-Files: signature.asc : 195 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmAFAL+ooVOtJV2Q/2dsb2JhbABagw2BLMNHAYEJFnWEAwEBAQR5EAIBCA4KLjIlAgQOBQ6INMx2F44TEQFQB4MtgRYBA4RjAo0bgUCHA5NYg0KBdzk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,501,1400025600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="54098534" Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2014 15:01:30 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com [173.36.12.87]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s5IF1Ur1004027 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:01:30 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.143]) by xhc-aln-x13.cisco.com ([173.36.12.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:01:29 -0500 From: "Fred Baker (fred)" To: Ted Lemon Thread-Topic: [savi] WGLC: draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-22 Thread-Index: AQHPiwYup47Cu3VTU0WFcli6AahC8g== Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:01:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: <52D2BDC7-9E55-43BC-8248-23C43DCDEF96@fugue.com> <093F4B34-0B4B-478B-A8EE-9D3C64CB5D74@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <093F4B34-0B4B-478B-A8EE-9D3C64CB5D74@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.21.78.105] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6AFBB963-EFCF-48CA-8A2A-77C766E30FA2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/savi/xXPy7fGaFaHDKhPROYxCQd2zpA0 Cc: "Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)" , Guang Yao , SAVI Mailing List , "draft-ietf-savi-dhcp@tools.ietf.org" , Jean-Michel Combes Subject: Re: [savi] WGLC: draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-22 X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:01:35 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_6AFBB963-EFCF-48CA-8A2A-77C766E30FA2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Apologies. I replied to an old email. On Jun 18, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: > On Apr 23, 2014, at 8:31 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: >> BTW, I am reluctant to weigh in on this question because I don't = think there's energy to do this work.=20 >=20 > Personally, since the products have been in the field since 2003 and = come from a number of manufacturers (ask Google about =93IP Source = Guard=94 for the western manufacturers; there are several Chinese = manufacturers as well), I find the entire re-engineering effort here = pointless. We started out to document the behavior of product in the = field and say =93do that for IPv6 too=94, and have spent the past seven = years debating it. >=20 > I would like to bring the process to closure. --Apple-Mail=_6AFBB963-EFCF-48CA-8A2A-77C766E30FA2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iD8DBQFToanHbjEdbHIsm0MRAu1iAJ9cSjEw3wluv3d6rriPomi+4zlflQCg2tGB GXZV7DNZOkE6ZMoqxSYztR4= =tMPa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_6AFBB963-EFCF-48CA-8A2A-77C766E30FA2-- From nobody Wed Jun 18 14:15:54 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E741A031D for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:15:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.551 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z-SZIbnR2HgK for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81731A0195 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5B72CEB6; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 00:15:41 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zptk9BwK0xFG; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 00:15:32 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748992CEB5; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 00:15:32 +0300 (EEST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F5D98FEB-1387-4530-9D18-D22512F8E105"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) From: Jari Arkko In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 00:15:31 +0300 Message-Id: References: To: Jean-Michel Combes X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/savi/ZgLlEcu4OAZq4FrUzgA_CtrJBGY Cc: SAVI Mailing List Subject: Re: [savi] DHCP SAVI: new WGLC X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:15:48 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_F5D98FEB-1387-4530-9D18-D22512F8E105 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii FWIW, I am happy with the document as it stands. Jari --Apple-Mail=_F5D98FEB-1387-4530-9D18-D22512F8E105 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIbBAEBCgAGBQJTogFzAAoJEM80gCTQU46q0yUP91auiyJKWe5Mh0TkfMHcIF6V KC4smep0I+XAgO2AqNmF8XxXx36kttg2wxzb8fWv9FQP8eT1Cmq+I6aFrcWHVOJp SRGnKqyv8mvr8vG5960thM+kHlG1nljyUC9UrhUYbEcMEPDR5yP0moGAemHnHhBO bxQrBWxATaBFumv08SSOeF7iFXeT4gvj4a2nGAG8cNu3v9SAEucjYFqMozjJtYxB GoNXgetGmxax7xIBKaymqM/g4I947IcPjdlQA8+b+np2PncOaEaIV19B4FYQZ0I4 dwnIm0ijKjulPTFet/7taBCg2Og/365mIKUSVYf7Nwf9HZ8XUXrW90JWd6TDyxAy kHC6rFDPF3YPZIpr41JtMjJls540KeBnJ2DGHq7NRgpaar0S9hteWdh8mayyi3zU SdsBxwn8dnWunzSVe0BPMoNFa6l1dQ+Z73SrdHhRCIVm3GqtnU7atMPS69NtPx3M nwJUm7SbVSAHk3bl9fEc3BgyNUMcE6BxkyM/wxgIzME6HUUc+xI0MTJVXUfm1VNu 9dRezceWP9TvSlaBRjyBpeqkD9MKifCV2beRwlCyYLbz2c8jQojqVrbuqGj5UTLo vxE3oJ5sbtPo2yHBo54feaqDJQz9TiNXGT6FVaSwFcnk0E71rjRwixf2ZYWS388O Fy1kdKqQcrhIWNA4Jc4= =imXO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_F5D98FEB-1387-4530-9D18-D22512F8E105-- From nobody Sat Jun 28 20:15:13 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9941A00FD; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:15:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z2Qqvmzy3VST; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:15:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213E11A01F6; Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:15:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.5.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20140629031504.16416.95156.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 20:15:04 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/savi/Y9JslIrOyCrGl31Q4mhW4O2-6KU Cc: savi@ietf.org Subject: [savi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-27.txt X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 03:15:07 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Source Address Validation Improvements Working Group of the IETF. Title : SAVI Solution for DHCP Authors : Jun Bi Jianping Wu Guang Yao Fred Baker Filename : draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-27.txt Pages : 44 Date : 2014-06-28 Abstract: This document specifies the procedure for creating a binding between a DHCPv4/DHCPv6 assigned IP address and a binding anchor on a SAVI (Source Address Validation Improvements) device. The bindings set up by this procedure is used to filter out packets with forged source IP address in DHCP scenario. This mechanism is proposed as a complement to ingress filtering to provide finer-grained source IP address validation. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-savi-dhcp/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-27 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-27 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/