From nobody Mon Jan 2 09:35:19 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: savi@ietf.org Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86272127076; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 09:35:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <148337851752.21908.284564685037728120.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 09:35:17 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: savi@ietf.org Subject: [savi] I-D Action: draft-ietf-savi-mix-15.txt X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 17:35:17 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Source Address Validation Improvements of the IETF. Title : SAVI for Mixed Address Assignment Methods Scenario Authors : Jun Bi Guang Yao Joel M. Halpern Eric Levy-Abegnoli Filename : draft-ietf-savi-mix-15.txt Pages : 11 Date : 2017-01-02 Abstract: In networks that use multiple techniques for address assignment, the spoofing of addresses assigned by each technique can be prevented using the appropriate Source Address Validation Improvement (SAVI) methods. This document reviews how multiple SAVI methods can coexist in a single SAVI device and collisions are resolved when the same binding entry is discovered by two or more methods. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-savi-mix/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-savi-mix-15 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-savi-mix-15 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Jan 9 07:29:39 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: savi@ietf.org Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF9D129D5B; Mon, 9 Jan 2017 07:29:31 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <148397577154.24980.9237130963495216628.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 07:29:31 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: savi-chairs@ietf.org, savi@ietf.org, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, The IESG , jeanmichel.combes@orange.com, draft-ietf-savi-mix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [savi] Protocol Action: 'SAVI for Mixed Address Assignment Methods Scenario' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-savi-mix-15.txt) X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 15:29:31 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'SAVI for Mixed Address Assignment Methods Scenario' (draft-ietf-savi-mix-15.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Source Address Validation Improvements Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Suresh Krishnan and Terry Manderson. A URL of this Internet Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-savi-mix/ Technical Summary In networks that use multiple techniques for address assignment, the appropriate Source Address Validation Improvement (SAVI) methods must be used to prevent spoofing of addresses assigned by each such technique. This document reviews how multiple SAVI methods can coexist in a single SAVI device and collisions are resolved when the same binding entry is discovered by two or more methods. Working Group Summary There was nothing noteworthy in the WG process. The WG itself is extremely low energy and it ready to be shut down. This work has been ongoing for a few years and has received several reviews over those years. Document Quality The document has received several reviews over its long lifecycle. There is a pending version to address the Secdir review. Personnel The document shepherd is Jean-Michel Combes. The Responsible AD is Suresh Krishnan.