Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime

From: "Salz, Rich" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 12:51:34 +0000

Re-sending because of typo in some addresses; sorry for the dups

--  
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: [email-masked] Twitter: RichSalz

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Salz, Rich
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 8:49 AM
> To: '?[email-masked]'; '?[email-masked]'; 'draft-ietf-isis-remaining-
> [email-masked]'
> Subject: secdir review of draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's  ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments
> just like any other last call comments.
> 
> This document is READY with one possible NIT.
> 
> I assume that "flooding" is a standard term used in the IS-IS community. If so,
> fine; if not, consider another term like "distribution" since flooding can have
> negative connotations in the security community, related to denial of service.
> 
> The problem statement was particularly well-done and informative.
> --
> Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
> IM: [email-masked] Twitter: RichSalz
>