From bounces-ietf-ssh-owner-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive=lists.ietf.org@NetBSD.org Fri Jan 19 03:22:08 2007
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H7p0i-0007Fr-O0
	for secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:22:08 -0500
Received: from mail.netbsd.org ([2001:4f8:4:7:2e0:81ff:fe52:9ab6])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H7p0f-00044e-SI
	for secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 03:22:08 -0500
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 0)
	id 4070963B21E; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:21:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ietf-ssh@netbsd.org
Delivered-To: ietf-ssh@netbsd.org
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (unknown [61.144.161.55])
	by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CE263B186
	for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:21:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12])
 by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar
 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JC300JKURA82L@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for
 ietf-ssh@netbsd.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:27:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.24])
 by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar
 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JC300J6KRA82A@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for
 ietf-ssh@netbsd.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:27:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.18.18.211])
 by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar
 3 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0JC300LJ2RA55H@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for
 ietf-ssh@netbsd.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:27:44 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:57:42 +0530
From: jimmy <jimmyb@huawei.com>
Subject: regarding rekey when compression is on
To: ietf-ssh@netbsd.org
Cc: manishpatidar@huawei.com
Message-id: <45B064DE.6050409@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
Sender: ietf-ssh-owner@NetBSD.org
Precedence: list
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f

Hi,

In SSH2 during re-keying with compression on, how is the exchange hash 
calculated? The rfc (4253) mentions in section 8 that I_C and I_S as the 
*payload* of the SSH_MSG_KEXINIT.

Now, is this the compressed or the uncompressed contents of those messages?

I understand from section 6 (binary packet protocol) that payload refers 
to the compressed contents. But i can also see that openssh uses the 
uncompressed contents.

Can someone clarify?


Thanks,
jimmy




From bounces-ietf-ssh-owner-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive=lists.ietf.org@NetBSD.org Fri Jan 19 04:09:26 2007
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H7pkU-0007fz-Ik
	for secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:09:26 -0500
Received: from mail.netbsd.org ([2001:4f8:4:7:2e0:81ff:fe52:9ab6])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H7pkS-0004XY-5q
	for secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:09:26 -0500
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 0)
	id 2CB7163B242; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:09:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org
Delivered-To: ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org
Received: from Sparkle.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA (Sparkle.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA [216.46.5.7])
	by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DCC63B231
	for <ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org>; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:09:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (from mouse@localhost)
	by Sparkle.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA03012;
	Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:09:17 -0500 (EST)
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Message-Id: <200701190909.EAA03012@Sparkle.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Erik-Conspiracy: There is no Conspiracy - and if there were I wouldn't be part of it anyway.
X-Message-Flag: Microsoft: the company who gave us the botnet zombies.
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:01:06 -0500 (EST)
To: ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: regarding rekey when compression is on
In-Reply-To: <45B064DE.6050409@huawei.com>
References: <45B064DE.6050409@huawei.com>
Sender: ietf-ssh-owner@NetBSD.org
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007

> The rfc (4253) mentions in section 8 that I_C and I_S as the
> *payload* of the SSH_MSG_KEXINIT.

> Now, is this the compressed or the uncompressed contents of those
> messages?

I'd say uncompressed, simply because it makes more sense to me. :)
I agree this point is underspecified; I wish we'd noticed it before the
drafts were turned into RFCs....

I note that section 8 also says

                    I_C is C's SSH_MSG_KEXINIT message and I_S is S's
   SSH_MSG_KEXINIT message that have been exchanged before this part
   begins.

To me, the "message" is the uncompressed version, though I can
certainly see it as a defensible stance that it is the compressed, or
even compressed and encrypted, version.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B



From bounces-ietf-ssh-owner-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive=lists.ietf.org@NetBSD.org Wed Jan 31 03:19:45 2007
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
	by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HCAgz-00050A-63
	for secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:19:45 -0500
Received: from mail.netbsd.org ([2001:4f8:4:7:2e0:81ff:fe52:9ab6])
	by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HCAgw-0000Kg-By
	for secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:19:45 -0500
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 0)
	id 6611E63B17A; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:19:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ietf-ssh@netbsd.org
Delivered-To: ietf-ssh@netbsd.org
Received: from real.edu.ee (server.real.tln.edu.ee [195.250.188.110])
	by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C4D63B152
	for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:19:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by real.edu.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0E8A4A6B
	for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:18:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from real.edu.ee ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (server [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 28964-01-11 for <ietf-ssh@netbsd.org>;
 Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:18:52 +0200 (EET)
Received: by real.edu.ee (Postfix, from userid 30)
	id ABED8A55C5; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:18:31 +0200 (EET)
To: ietf-ssh@netbsd.org
Subject: Can I trust you?
From: Jarvis Reeves Jr <jarvis-reeves@usarmy.com>
Reply-To: jmrjr11@yahoo.dk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <20070131081831.ABED8A55C5@real.edu.ee>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:18:31 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at real.edu.ee
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER Improper use of control character (char 0D hex) in message header 'From': From: Jarvis Reeves Jr <jarvis-reeves@usarmy.com>\r\n
Sender: ietf-ssh-owner@NetBSD.org
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25


Hello Pal,
=20
 I hope my mail meets you well. I am in need of your assistance. My name =
is Sgt Jarvis Reeves Jr. I am a military attache with the Engineering uni=
t here in Ba'qubah Iraq for the United States.
=20
Awaiting your urgent response ASAP.
=20
Your Buddy.
Sgt Jarvis Reeves

God Bless America!!!






