Subject: Re: [sfc] WG adoption of draft-quinn-sfc-problem-statement-02

From: Nicolas BOUTHORS <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:31:52 +0000

I recently started to follow this group, so my question has possibly been addressed before.

The document mentions multi tenancy  as a source of topology viability issues, and refers to
the  NVO3 working group mentionning that it does not address multi-tenancy.

As multi-tenancy is often tied to overlay based solutions, it could be usefull to note somewhere that this
could have to compose with the notion of Service Overlay described in 3.1.

This would be the case for example in Gi networks supporting MVNO traffic.

Nicolas