From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Mon May 01 18:41:09 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fah4J-0008CR-OQ; Mon, 01 May 2006 18:40:39 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fah4I-0008CL-EK for sidr@ietf.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 18:40:38 -0400 Received: from ns1.tislabs.com ([192.94.214.100] helo=nutshell.tislabs.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fah4H-0000R2-2y for sidr@ietf.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 18:40:38 -0400 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nutshell.tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id k41MXf7g018026 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 18:38:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from filbert.tislabs.com(10.66.1.10) by nutshell.tislabs.com via csmap (V6.0) id srcAAAiWa4gJ; Mon, 1 May 06 18:32:56 -0400 Received: (from sandy@localhost) by tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id k41KumsV027036; Mon, 1 May 2006 16:56:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 16:56:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200605012056.k41KumsV027036@tislabs.com> From: sandy@tislabs.com To: sidr@ietf.org X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2 Cc: Subject: [Sidr] IETF Meeting Survey X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org The IETF Admininstrative Director has requested that all wg chairs ask members of their working groups "to complete a short survey that focuses primarily, but not exclusively, on their meeting experience in Dallas." The intent of making the request through the working group lists is to try to get broader response from the IETF community. His message added: "I truly want the info to make the changes members of the community want" The survey can be found at: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=649182049947 --Sandy _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Thu May 11 04:33:05 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe6an-0005ym-Au; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:32:17 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe6al-0005yZ-Oz for sidr@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:32:15 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([61.144.161.54] helo=huawei.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe6ak-0004sT-1W for sidr@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 04:32:15 -0400 Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ300NCBEYT4F@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for sidr@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:44:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.3]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ3009KMEYHJD@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for sidr@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:44:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from Z48186 ([10.110.114.97]) by szxml01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IZ3008GDF4GGG@szxml01-in.huawei.com>; Thu, 11 May 2006 16:48:20 +0800 (CST) Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 16:29:55 +0800 From: zhaoye To: Geoff Huston Message-id: <000001c674d5$150e90d0$61726e0a@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcZ01RSGi/m7CJ2LQdKaMlIz3W773g== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2 Cc: Sidr Subject: [Sidr] a proposal X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org Hi Geoff, Current SIDR proposals focus on validation of BGP UPDATEs. I think the way to prevent an AS from advertising error information is another important aspect. Since manual configuration and misconfiguration is an important reason of the problem, to solve the problem in the first place is necessary to mitigate possible sufferings. Therefore, I propose that relative task should be included in SIDR. thanks Zhao Ye _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Thu May 11 06:37:33 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe8XJ-00005w-GB; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:36:49 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe8XI-00005q-8F for sidr@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:36:48 -0400 Received: from kahuna.telstra.net ([203.50.0.6]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fe8XG-0001j1-Ib for sidr@ietf.org; Thu, 11 May 2006 06:36:48 -0400 Received: from gihm3.apnic.net (dhcp14.potaroo.net [203.10.60.14]) by kahuna.telstra.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4BAaHUG025556; Thu, 11 May 2006 20:36:17 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from gih@apnic.net) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20060511202940.02d06e10@kahuna.telstra.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:36:14 +1000 To: zhaoye From: Geoff Huston In-Reply-To: <000001c674d5$150e90d0$61726e0a@china.huawei.com> References: <000001c674d5$150e90d0$61726e0a@china.huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4 Cc: Sidr Subject: [Sidr] Re: a proposal X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org Hi, I should note that the current SIDR work actually does not focus on BGP updates - indeed the current focus is on information origination, as this aspect of securing the inter-domain routing system is one where the RPSEC WG requirement work does appear to have reached clear consensus. So we have a charter and we are assembling material to consider relating to the ability to validate the origination of routing information. The ability to validate origination encompasses the ability to detect attempts to originate incorrect information, including the outcomes of misconfiguration you mention in your note. The next step is to ask if yoiu have a specific proposal here that addresses these requirements for validation of origination in routing, and if so are you willing to submit this as an Internet draft so that the working group can review it, or have you already submitted your ideas as a draft? regards, Geoff At 06:29 PM 11/05/2006, zhaoye wrote: >Hi Geoff, > >Current SIDR proposals focus on validation of BGP UPDATEs. I think the way >to prevent an AS from advertising error information is another important >aspect. Since manual configuration and misconfiguration is an important >reason of the problem, to solve the problem in the first place is necessary >to mitigate possible sufferings. >Therefore, I propose that relative task should be included in SIDR. > >thanks > >Zhao Ye _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Fri May 12 02:57:38 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeRaO-0007DC-2w; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:57:16 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeRaM-0007Bh-Ql for sidr@ietf.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:57:14 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([61.144.161.54] helo=huawei.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeRNO-0007xt-4b for sidr@ietf.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 02:43:52 -0400 Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ500JTY4LTH2@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for sidr@ietf.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:56:17 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IZ500LOB4LTT8@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for sidr@ietf.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:56:17 +0800 (CST) Received: from Z48186 ([10.110.114.97]) by szxml02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IZ500J984LBJL@szxml02-in.huawei.com>; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:56:02 +0800 (CST) Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:41:23 +0800 From: zhaoye In-reply-to: <6.2.0.14.2.20060511202940.02d06e10@kahuna.telstra.net> To: 'Geoff Huston' Message-id: <004d01c6758f$15dfa7f0$61726e0a@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcZ05sJv9gYZ++AzQZqiIoMlL9puegAqByQw X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca Cc: 'Sidr' Subject: [Sidr] RE: a proposal X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Geoff Huston [mailto:gih@apnic.net] > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 6:36 PM > To: zhaoye > Cc: Sidr > Subject: Re: a proposal > > Hi, > > I should note that the current SIDR work actually does not > focus on BGP updates - indeed the current focus is on > information origination, as this aspect of securing the > inter-domain routing system is one where the RPSEC WG > requirement work does appear to have reached clear consensus. > OK, I did not select an appropriate term. What I said is about origination authentication of a route. > So we have a charter and we are assembling material to > consider relating to the ability to validate the origination > of routing information. The ability to validate origination > encompasses the ability to detect attempts to originate > incorrect information, including the outcomes of > misconfiguration you mention in your note. > After reading the SIDR charter and PRSEC BGP security requirement, I did not make sure whether "the ability to detect attempts to originate incorrect information" is a work group task before. I think validation of an incoming route and prevention of originating an invalid route are different function modules. Although both may be included in a completed BGP security solution, the latter can be implemented solely. I have not considered specific modification of BGP, but I think such implement is low cost and suits for routers with limited resource. > The next step is to ask if yoiu have a specific proposal here > that addresses these requirements for validation of > origination in routing, and if so are you willing to submit > this as an Internet draft so that the working group can > review it, or have you already submitted your ideas as a draft? > > regards, > > Geoff Yes, I am preparing a draft and will submit it in a few days. _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Fri May 12 21:49:16 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FejF4-0007eR-TE; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:48:26 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FejF3-0007eG-BP for sidr@ietf.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:48:25 -0400 Received: from relay1.es.uci.edu ([128.200.73.41]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FejF0-0000Xb-10 for sidr@ietf.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 21:48:25 -0400 Received: from [128.200.132.167] (dhcp-132-167.nac.uci.edu [128.200.132.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by relay1.es.uci.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k4D1lcpw030030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 18:48:21 -0700 X-UCInetID: pmain Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v749.3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: sidr@ietf.org From: Paul Main Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:48:20 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.749.3) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581 Subject: [Sidr] S-BGP Research Survey X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org Greetings, We are two graduate students at the University of California at Irvine. My partner and I are conducting a research project on Secure BGP for our Advanced Networks course. In particular, we want to know how willing organizations are to implement Secure BGP. We have created a survey about Secure BGP. If you have time, we invite you to take part in this survey. It is only 10 multiple choice questions long, and it should take about 2 minutes. The survey does not require a great deal knowledge about Secure BGP, so all are welcome. The survey is completely anonymous, and your identity is not recorded in any way (email, IP address). The URL for the survey is: http://eee.uci.edu/survey/sbgp We thank you for your time. -Paul Main and Paul DiGioia _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Wed May 24 16:48:39 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fj0HC-0000iZ-Pb; Wed, 24 May 2006 16:48:18 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fj0HB-0000iU-JW for sidr@ietf.org; Wed, 24 May 2006 16:48:17 -0400 Received: from kahuna.telstra.net ([203.50.0.6]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fj0H9-0007bH-Uz for sidr@ietf.org; Wed, 24 May 2006 16:48:17 -0400 Received: from gihm3.apnic.net (dhcp20.potaroo.net [203.10.60.20]) by kahuna.telstra.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4OKm6En060362; Thu, 25 May 2006 06:48:07 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from gih@apnic.net) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20060525064248.02db3fa0@kahuna.telstra.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:48:02 +1000 To: sidr@ietf.org From: Geoff Huston In-Reply-To: <200605101523.k4AFNkuX003795@tislabs.com> References: <200605101523.k4AFNkuX003795@tislabs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8 Cc: robert Loomans , ggm@apnic.net Subject: [Sidr] Request for SIDR WG to adopt draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org (working Group co-chair hat OFF) I would like to request that draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt be adopted as a WG document. It's scope is the SIDR charter item: "Submit initial draft on certificate objects to be used within this architecture" As I am one of the co-authors of this document I'd like to request our other co-chair, Sandy, to look after the formalities of this action. thanks, Geoff, on behalf of Geoff, George and Rob _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Mon May 29 14:52:29 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fkmpo-0000nO-AP; Mon, 29 May 2006 14:51:24 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fkmpn-0000nJ-CR for sidr@ietf.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 14:51:23 -0400 Received: from sentry.gw.tislabs.com ([192.94.214.100] helo=nutshell.tislabs.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fkmpm-00053N-4O for sidr@ietf.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 14:51:23 -0400 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nutshell.tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id k4TIoP0b014950 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 14:50:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from filbert.tislabs.com(10.66.1.10) by nutshell.tislabs.com via csmap (V6.0) id srcAAAfza47C; Mon, 29 May 06 14:49:39 -0400 Received: (from sandy@localhost) by tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id k4TImCHs018556; Mon, 29 May 2006 14:48:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:48:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200605291848.k4TImCHs018556@tislabs.com> From: sandy@tislabs.com To: sidr@ietf.org X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370 Cc: Subject: [Sidr] Re: Request for SIDR WG to adopt draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org >I would like to request that draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt be adopted >as a WG document. To be taken on as a working group work item, there must be rough consensus in the working group that the document is taking the correct approach and would be a good starting place for a WG product. Please reply to the mailing list with approval or disapproval of taking this draft on as a working group work item. Note that support is also required, so lack of responses will be taken negatively. So please do respond. If you approve, it would also be useful if you would indicate your willingness to review the document from time to time. --Sandy _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Mon May 29 18:58:16 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkqgK-0001WO-OR; Mon, 29 May 2006 18:57:52 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkqgI-0001WJ-KT for sidr@ietf.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 18:57:50 -0400 Received: from ns1.tislabs.com ([192.94.214.100] helo=nutshell.tislabs.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkqgH-0005tZ-AC for sidr@ietf.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 18:57:50 -0400 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nutshell.tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id k4TMukmT009827 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 18:56:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from filbert.tislabs.com(10.66.1.10) by nutshell.tislabs.com via csmap (V6.0) id srcAAAZdaOyr; Mon, 29 May 06 18:47:27 -0400 Received: (from sandy@localhost) by tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id k4TJpWHH020335; Mon, 29 May 2006 15:51:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 15:51:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200605291951.k4TJpWHH020335@tislabs.com> From: sandy@tislabs.com To: sidr@ietf.org X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 6d62ab47271805379d7172ee693a45db Cc: sandy@tislabs.com Subject: [Sidr] Re: Request for SIDR WG to adopt draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org Here is a link to the draft in question: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt --Sandy _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Mon May 29 22:45:49 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkuED-0006cB-7m; Mon, 29 May 2006 22:45:05 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkuEC-0006c6-RH for sidr@ietf.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 22:45:04 -0400 Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fkt2G-0002j3-AF for sidr@ietf.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 21:28:40 -0400 Received: from monster.hopcount.ca ([199.212.90.4]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fkstm-0006tt-3h for sidr@ietf.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 21:19:55 -0400 Received: from octopus.hopcount.ca ([199.212.90.5]) by monster.hopcount.ca with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fksth-000BJ5-NH; Tue, 30 May 2006 01:19:53 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <61F5BF2C-1B83-4E37-AD16-E4C113AF5F53@ca.afilias.info> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joe Abley Subject: Re: [Sidr] Re: Request for SIDR WG to adopt draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:19:48 -0400 To: sandy@tislabs.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab Cc: sidr@ietf.org X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org On Mon, 29 May 2006 14:48:12 -0400, sandy@tislabs.com wrote: >> I would like to request that draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt be >> adopted >> as a WG document. > > To be taken on as a working group work item, there must be rough > consensus in the working group that the document is taking the correct > approach and would be a good starting place for a WG product. > > Please reply to the mailing list with approval or disapproval of > taking this draft on as a working group work item. I approve of the working group adopting this draft. > If you approve, it would also be useful if you would indicate your > willingness to review the document from time to time. I could do that. Joe _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Mon May 29 22:52:28 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkuLM-0001Qr-JD; Mon, 29 May 2006 22:52:28 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkuLL-0001Qm-At for sidr@ietf.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 22:52:27 -0400 Received: from smtp2.arin.net ([192.149.252.32]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkuLJ-0002KW-4L for sidr@ietf.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 22:52:27 -0400 Received: by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 5003) id 02249144E75; Mon, 29 May 2006 22:52:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mercury.arin.net (mercury.arin.net [192.136.136.131]) by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E25B144E6A; Mon, 29 May 2006 22:52:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mercury.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 538) id 515A81FFB8; Mon, 29 May 2006 22:52:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB3D1FFB7; Mon, 29 May 2006 22:52:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 22:52:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Christensen To: sandy@tislabs.com Subject: Re: [Sidr] Re: Request for SIDR WG to adopt draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft In-Reply-To: <200605291848.k4TImCHs018556@tislabs.com> Message-ID: References: <200605291848.k4TImCHs018556@tislabs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-arin1 (2004-01-11) on smtp2.arin.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-55.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=2.63-arin1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8 Cc: sidr@ietf.org X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org On Mon, 29 May 2006 sandy@tislabs.com wrote: > >I would like to request that draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt be adopted > >as a WG document. > > To be taken on as a working group work item, there must be rough > consensus in the working group that the document is taking the correct > approach and would be a good starting place for a WG product. > > Please reply to the mailing list with approval or disapproval of > taking this draft on as a working group work item. So replied. I support adoption of this draft by the WG as a work item. > If you approve, it would also be useful if you would indicate your > willingness to review the document from time to time. Willing and interested. - Tim _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Tue May 30 03:04:49 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkyH4-0000GZ-4q; Tue, 30 May 2006 03:04:18 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkyH2-0000GU-KN for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 03:04:16 -0400 Received: from postman.ripe.net ([193.0.0.199]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkyH1-0000zs-B1 for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 03:04:16 -0400 Received: by postman.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 4008) id 88E8F2401B; Tue, 30 May 2006 09:04:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from herring.ripe.net (herring.ripe.net [193.0.1.203]) by postman.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640C623F5A; Tue, 30 May 2006 09:04:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Geir.ripe.net (cow.ripe.net [193.0.1.239]) by herring.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A4A2F593; Tue, 30 May 2006 09:04:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060530073024.033adeb8@ripe.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 07:31:17 +0200 To: sandy@tislabs.com, sidr@ietf.org From: Henk Uijterwaal Subject: Re: [Sidr] Re: Request for SIDR WG to adopt draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft In-Reply-To: <200605291848.k4TImCHs018556@tislabs.com> References: <200605291848.k4TImCHs018556@tislabs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-RIPE-Spam-Level: X-RIPE-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-RIPE-Spam-Status: N 0.000134 / -4.4 X-RIPE-Signature: 8f7f7bce5f7ce2aef4761622c67e529a X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab Cc: X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org >Please reply to the mailing list with approval or disapproval of >taking this draft on as a working group work item. I agree with taking this on as a WG item and will read the document. Henk ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Henk Uijterwaal Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net RIPE Network Coordination Centre http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk P.O.Box 10096 Singel 258 Phone: +31.20.5354414 1001 EB Amsterdam 1016 AB Amsterdam Fax: +31.20.5354445 The Netherlands The Netherlands Mobile: +31.6.55861746 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1160438400. Watch this space... _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Tue May 30 03:25:43 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fkybc-0001L9-OW; Tue, 30 May 2006 03:25:32 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fkybb-0001L1-Dy for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 03:25:31 -0400 Received: from postman.ripe.net ([193.0.0.199]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fkyba-0002Ey-4H for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 03:25:31 -0400 Received: by postman.ripe.net (Postfix, from userid 4008) id C626924045; Tue, 30 May 2006 09:25:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from herring.ripe.net (herring.ripe.net [193.0.1.203]) by postman.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F0023F5A; Tue, 30 May 2006 09:25:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [193.0.1.62] (x62.ripe.net [193.0.1.62]) by herring.ripe.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06B12F593; Tue, 30 May 2006 09:25:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <447BF369.60302@ripe.net> Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 09:25:29 +0200 From: Robert Kisteleki Organization: RIPE NCC User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8 (X11/20060503) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sandy@tislabs.com Subject: Re: [Sidr] Re: Request for SIDR WG to adopt draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft References: <200605291848.k4TImCHs018556@tislabs.com> In-Reply-To: <200605291848.k4TImCHs018556@tislabs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RIPE-Spam-Level: X-RIPE-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-RIPE-Spam-Status: N 0.000223 / -4.4 X-RIPE-Signature: c07571af3ac18d20065361af4a0b8c8f X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d Cc: sidr@ietf.org X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org sandy@tislabs.com wrote: >>I would like to request that draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt be adopted >>as a WG document. > > > To be taken on as a working group work item, there must be rough > consensus in the working group that the document is taking the correct > approach and would be a good starting place for a WG product. > > Please reply to the mailing list with approval or disapproval of > taking this draft on as a working group work item. > > Note that support is also required, so lack of responses will be > taken negatively. So please do respond. > > If you approve, it would also be useful if you would indicate your > willingness to review the document from time to time. I also support the document and have interest in reviewing it. Robert > --Sandy > > _______________________________________________ > Sidr mailing list > Sidr@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Tue May 30 04:53:40 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fkzyb-0006os-Oo; Tue, 30 May 2006 04:53:21 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fkzya-0006oj-Gm for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 04:53:20 -0400 Received: from purgatory.unfix.org ([213.136.24.43]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkzyY-0002vE-QI for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 04:53:20 -0400 Received: from firenze.zurich.ibm.com (pat.zurich.ibm.com [195.176.20.45]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by purgatory.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3045828C; Tue, 30 May 2006 10:53:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [Sidr] Re: Request for SIDR WG to adopt draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft From: Jeroen Massar To: sandy@tislabs.com In-Reply-To: <200605291848.k4TImCHs018556@tislabs.com> References: <200605291848.k4TImCHs018556@tislabs.com> Organization: Unfix Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 10:52:59 +0200 Message-Id: <1148979179.1337.4.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081 Cc: sidr@ietf.org X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1016756297==" Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org --===============1016756297== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-B2/OuPCC3Qla27JhNFsE" --=-B2/OuPCC3Qla27JhNFsE Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 14:48 -0400, sandy@tislabs.com wrote: > >I would like to request that draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt be adopt= ed > >as a WG document. >=20 > To be taken on as a working group work item, there must be rough > consensus in the working group that the document is taking the correct=20 > approach and would be a good starting place for a WG product. >=20 > Please reply to the mailing list with approval or disapproval of > taking this draft on as a working group work item. This draft fits perfectly in the charter of this WG and addresses the important bits. Making it a WG item would thus be a good thing. Thus from my point I reply for approval as a WG item. > If you approve, it would also be useful if you would indicate your=20 > willingness to review the document from time to time. Time permitting of course, only read the crux of it now, but I'll put it on the review stack. Greets, Jeroen --=-B2/OuPCC3Qla27JhNFsE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Jeroen Massar / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/ iHUEABECADUFAkR8B+ouFIAAAAAAFQAQcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JnamVy b2VuQHVuZml4Lm9yZwAKCRApqihSMz58I+woAJ0eLubGv77DIz1qSln+Ic4yqW/a FQCgjtmQcH52XuuW6zBmDy/Da4Pnq9o= =kUmi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-B2/OuPCC3Qla27JhNFsE-- --===============1016756297== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr --===============1016756297==-- From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Tue May 30 08:13:35 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fl36D-00079Y-Ev; Tue, 30 May 2006 08:13:25 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fl36B-00079F-S7 for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 08:13:23 -0400 Received: from clone.registro.br ([200.160.2.4]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fl36A-0003Se-Fy for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 08:13:23 -0400 Received: by clone.registro.br (Postfix, from userid 1019) id 562A82A6EF; Tue, 30 May 2006 09:13:17 -0300 (BRT) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 09:13:17 -0300 From: Ricardo Patara To: sandy@tislabs.com Subject: Re: [Sidr] Re: Request for SIDR WG to adopt draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft Message-ID: <20060530121317.GD75253@lacnic.net> References: <200605291848.k4TImCHs018556@tislabs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200605291848.k4TImCHs018556@tislabs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Organization: LACNIC X-URL: http://lacnic.net/ X-Operating-System: FreeBSD X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22 Cc: sidr@ietf.org X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org hello, I support it and will review it from time to time. ricardo | >I would like to request that draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt be adopted | >as a WG document. | | To be taken on as a working group work item, there must be rough | consensus in the working group that the document is taking the correct | approach and would be a good starting place for a WG product. | | Please reply to the mailing list with approval or disapproval of | taking this draft on as a working group work item. | | Note that support is also required, so lack of responses will be | taken negatively. So please do respond. | | If you approve, it would also be useful if you would indicate your | willingness to review the document from time to time. | | --Sandy | | _______________________________________________ | Sidr mailing list | Sidr@ietf.org | https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr | _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Tue May 30 08:41:53 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fl3XY-0000C5-0z; Tue, 30 May 2006 08:41:40 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fl3XW-0000C0-ED for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 08:41:38 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([61.144.161.53] helo=huawei.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fl3XU-00067Z-Qh for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 08:41:38 -0400 Received: from huawei.com (szxga01-in [172.24.2.3]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J0200FFYWLTMF@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 20:41:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.24]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J020089BWLTB9@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 20:41:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from Z48186 ([10.110.114.57]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0J0200382X0UOE@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 20:50:58 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 20:40:40 +0800 From: zhaoye Subject: RE: [Sidr] Request for SIDR WG to adopt draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft In-reply-to: <6.2.0.14.2.20060525064248.02db3fa0@kahuna.telstra.net> To: 'Geoff Huston' , sidr@ietf.org Message-id: <000a01c683e6$4287a360$39726e0a@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Thread-index: AcZ/c4SkXHHjfjmNRwqdAR1oKbJi5gEckBXQ X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007 Cc: ggm@apnic.net X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Geoff Huston [mailto:gih@apnic.net] > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 4:48 AM > To: sidr@ietf.org > Cc: robert Loomans; ggm@apnic.net > Subject: [Sidr] Request for SIDR WG to adopt > draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft > > (working Group co-chair hat OFF) > > I would like to request that > draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt be adopted as a WG document. > > It's scope is the SIDR charter item: "Submit initial draft on > certificate objects to be used within this architecture" > > As I am one of the co-authors of this document I'd like to > request our other co-chair, Sandy, to look after the > formalities of this action. I support this draft to be a working group item and will review it. _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Tue May 30 10:09:24 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fl4u6-0004Rw-6Q; Tue, 30 May 2006 10:09:02 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fl4u5-0004Rr-3Y for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 10:09:01 -0400 Received: from uswgco34.uswest.com ([199.168.32.123]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fl4u2-0005Na-OZ for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 10:09:01 -0400 Received: from egate-ne9.uswc.uswest.com (egate-ne9.uswc.uswest.com [151.117.69.23]) by uswgco34.uswest.com (8/8) with ESMTP id k4UE8rt1010791; Tue, 30 May 2006 08:08:53 -0600 (MDT) Received: from ITDENE2KSM01.AD.QINTRA.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by egate-ne9.uswc.uswest.com (8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4UE8nsw004227; Tue, 30 May 2006 09:08:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from qtdene2k3m02.AD.QINTRA.COM ([10.1.4.148]) by ITDENE2KSM01.AD.QINTRA.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 30 May 2006 08:08:52 -0600 X-MessageTextProcessor: DisclaimIt (2.70.270) [Qwest Communications International Inc.] X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.504 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [Sidr] Re: Request for SIDR WG to adoptdraft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 08:08:51 -0600 Message-ID: <50E094F67A606244AE045ACB99F9E48E01E51FAF@qtdene2k3m02.AD.QINTRA.COM> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Sidr] Re: Request for SIDR WG to adoptdraft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft thread-index: AcaDUPueoww5TMnISRS3pz9BixnVVAAoTCFw Importance: normal Priority: normal From: "Smith, Donald" To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 May 2006 14:08:52.0487 (UTC) FILETIME=[9496C170:01C683F2] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 0ddefe323dd869ab027dbfff7eff0465 Cc: X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org I agree this document should be adopted as a WG draft. I have will review it from time to time. (coffee !=3D sleep) & (!coffee =3D=3D sleep) Donald.Smith@qwest.com giac =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: sandy@tislabs.com [mailto:sandy@tislabs.com]=20 > Sent: Monday, May 29, 2006 12:48 PM > To: sidr@ietf.org > Subject: [Sidr] Re: Request for SIDR WG to=20 > adoptdraft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft >=20 > >I would like to request that=20 > draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt be adopted > >as a WG document. >=20 > To be taken on as a working group work item, there must be rough > consensus in the working group that the document is taking=20 > the correct=20 > approach and would be a good starting place for a WG product. >=20 > Please reply to the mailing list with approval or disapproval of > taking this draft on as a working group work item. >=20 > Note that support is also required, so lack of responses will be > taken negatively. So please do respond. >=20 > If you approve, it would also be useful if you would indicate your=20 > willingness to review the document from time to time. >=20 > --Sandy >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Sidr mailing list > Sidr@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >=20 This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential = or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is = strictly=20 prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication = in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and = destroy=20 all copies of the communication and any attachments. _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Tue May 30 11:37:22 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fl6HP-0003gL-LU; Tue, 30 May 2006 11:37:11 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fl6HO-0003gG-0r for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 11:37:10 -0400 Received: from m106.maoz.com ([205.167.76.9]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fl6HM-00074J-Jr for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 11:37:10 -0400 Received: from m106.maoz.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by m106.maoz.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4UFb7Wj010310; Tue, 30 May 2006 08:37:07 -0700 Received: from localhost (ttauber@localhost) by m106.maoz.com (8.13.6/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k4UFb7X6010307; Tue, 30 May 2006 08:37:07 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: m106.maoz.com: ttauber owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 08:37:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Tony Tauber X-X-Sender: ttauber@m106.maoz.com To: sandy@tislabs.com Subject: Re: [Sidr] Re: Request for SIDR WG to adopt draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft In-Reply-To: <200605291848.k4TImCHs018556@tislabs.com> Message-ID: References: <200605291848.k4TImCHs018556@tislabs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228 Cc: sidr@ietf.org X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org Yes, and yes. Thanks, Tony On Mon, 29 May 2006, sandy@tislabs.com wrote: >> I would like to request that draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt be >> adopted as a WG document. > > To be taken on as a working group work item, there must be rough > consensus in the working group that the document is taking the correct > approach and would be a good starting place for a WG product. > > Please reply to the mailing list with approval or disapproval of > taking this draft on as a working group work item. > > Note that support is also required, so lack of responses will be > taken negatively. So please do respond. > > If you approve, it would also be useful if you would indicate your > willingness to review the document from time to time. > > --Sandy > > _______________________________________________ > Sidr mailing list > Sidr@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Tue May 30 17:46:11 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlC2O-0003mh-Q5; Tue, 30 May 2006 17:46:04 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlC2N-0003mX-7j for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 17:46:03 -0400 Received: from mx12.bbn.com ([128.33.0.81]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlC2K-0000Mh-14 for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 17:46:03 -0400 Received: from dhcp89-089-106.bbn.com ([128.89.89.106]) by mx12.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FlC2J-0006IX-5C for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 17:45:59 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 17:36:10 -0400 To: sidr@ietf.org From: Stephen Kent Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 8ac499381112328dd60aea5b1ff596ea Subject: [Sidr] support for proposed work item X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org I support adoption of draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a SIDR work item. I will send comments to the list on suggested changes to the text to make it more consistent with reference to RFC 3280 (the relevant PKIX standard), perhaps late this week or early next week. Steve _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr From sidr-bounces@ietf.org Tue May 30 21:07:48 2006 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlFBN-0002Fv-FU; Tue, 30 May 2006 21:07:33 -0400 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlFBM-0002Fq-N0 for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 21:07:32 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([61.144.161.54] helo=huawei.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlFBL-0004Na-3a for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 21:07:32 -0400 Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J0300BKNVSS88@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for sidr@ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 09:22:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from M55527 ([10.110.114.96]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0J0300E9RVSRLR@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for sidr@ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 09:22:04 +0800 (CST) Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 09:06:41 +0800 From: Mach Chen Subject: Re: [Sidr] Request for SIDR WG to adopt draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft To: sandy@tislabs.com, sidr@ietf.org Message-id: <006401c6844e$79eeda90$60726e0a@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: <200605101523.k4AFNkuX003795@tislabs.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20060525064248.02db3fa0@kahuna.telstra.net> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5 Cc: X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org I support this document should be adopted as a WG draft and I will review it . ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Huston" To: Cc: "robert Loomans" ; Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 4:48 AM Subject: [Sidr] Request for SIDR WG to adopt draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt as a WG draft > (working Group co-chair hat OFF) > > I would like to request that draft-huston-sidr-res-certs-00.txt be adopted > as a WG document. > > It's scope is the SIDR charter item: "Submit initial draft on certificate > objects to be used within this architecture" > > As I am one of the co-authors of this document I'd like to request our > other co-chair, Sandy, to look after the formalities of this action. > > > thanks, > > Geoff, on behalf of Geoff, George and Rob > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sidr mailing list > Sidr@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr