Subject: Re: [sidr] WG Adoption call for draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-01.txt

From: "Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:17:37 +0000

Sandy,

Just upload the old version as draft-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-00.

Link: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-00.txt

Roque.

On Jul 29, 2012, at 1:26 AM, Murphy, Sandra wrote:

> The eventual response from the wg showed consensus for adoption of this draft.
> 
> The authors may submit the draft as an initial version sidr draft (draft-ietf-sidr-xxx-00).  At your option, you may alert the chairs of the draft name, and the submission can then be pre-approved. 
> 
> --Sandy
> ________________________________________
> From: [email-masked] [[email-masked]] on behalf of Murphy, Sandra [[email-masked]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 4:45 PM
> To: Roque Gagliano (rogaglia); [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [sidr] WG Adoption call    for     draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-01.txt
> 
> There were only two responses to this call for adoption.  Both were positive (and one was followed by extensive comments), but that's a pretty low indication of wg interest.
> 
> On the chance that people might be on holiday, we will give the wg until 5 July (one week from today) to consider this work.
> 
> This is your last chance, so speak up.
> 
> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
> ________________________________________
> From: [email-masked] [[email-masked]] on behalf of Murphy, Sandra [[email-masked]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 5:27 PM
> To: Roque Gagliano (rogaglia); [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: [sidr] WG Adoption call for    draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-01.txt
> 
> The authors request below that the wg adopt this work as a work item.
> 
> The draft is available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover.
> 
> Please respond to the list to say whether you accept this draft as a working group draft and are willing to work on it.  Remember that you do not need to accept all content in a draft to adopt, as draft editors are required to reflect the consensus of the working group.
> 
> This call will end 26 Jun 2012.
> 
> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
> 
> 
> 
> From: [email-masked] [[email-masked]] on behalf of Roque Gagliano (rogaglia) [[email-masked]]
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 8:05 AM
> 
> To: [email-masked]
> 
> Subject: [sidr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-01.txt
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear WG,
> 
> 
> 
> We submitted a new version of this draft based on the feedback from our last meeting in Paris.
> 
> 
> 
> As mentioned during Brian's presentation we would like to ask for WG adoption.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Roque
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> 
> 
> From: <[email-masked]>
> 
> 
> 
> Date: June 5, 2012 1:58:52 PM GMT+02:00
> 
> 
> 
> To: <[email-masked]>
> 
> 
> 
> Cc: <[email-masked]>,
> <[email-masked]>
> 
> 
> 
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-01.txt
> 
> 
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Roque Gagliano and posted to the IETF repository.
> 
> 
> 
> Filename: draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover
> 
> Revision: 01
> 
> Title: BGPSEC router key rollover as an alternative to beaconing
> 
> Creation date: 2012-06-05
> 
> WG ID: Individual Submission
> 
> Number of pages: 15
> 
> 
> 
> Abstract:
> 
>  The current BGPSEC draft documents do not specifies a key rollover
> 
>  process for routers.  This document describes a possible key rollover
> 
>  process and explores its impact to mitigate replay attacks and
> 
>  eliminate the need for beaconing in BGPSEC.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr