
From nobody Fri Oct  4 13:25:54 2019
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84080120025 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  4 Oct 2019 13:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Whrr9Ke_nUlS for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  4 Oct 2019 13:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1963912004A for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri,  4 Oct 2019 13:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3FBF4B81D81; Fri,  4 Oct 2019 13:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
To: gih@apnic.net, ggm@apnic.net, carlos@lacnic.net, tim@ripe.net, andy@arin.net, daniel@afrinic.net, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, morrowc@ops-netman.net, sandy@tislabs.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: housley@vigilsec.com, sidr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20191004202545.3FBF4B81D81@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri,  4 Oct 2019 13:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/2ZpOi1Ww4PPB8VM_CH6hlXwJJrg>
Subject: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8360 (5870)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:25:53 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8360,
"Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation Reconsidered".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5870

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>

Section: 4.2.3

Original Text
-------------
       ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 EXTENSION ::= {
         SYNTAX ASIdentifiers
         IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2
       }

       id-pe-autonomousSysIds OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pe 29 }

Corrected Text
--------------
       ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 EXTENSION ::= {
         SYNTAX ASIdentifiers
         IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2
       }

       id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pe 29 }

Notes
-----
The "-v2" is missing from the identifier.  It is needed for the ASN.1 module to compile properly.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8360 (draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation Reconsidered
Publication Date    : April 2018
Author(s)           : G. Huston, G. Michaelson, C. Martinez, T. Bruijnzeels, A. Newton, D. Shaw
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG


From nobody Fri Oct  4 19:42:36 2019
Return-Path: <gih@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E411120086 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  4 Oct 2019 19:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=apnic.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qlxTSS0wKy9R for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  4 Oct 2019 19:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr1310081.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.131.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5505B120020 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri,  4 Oct 2019 19:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=M82Zx1Itaxn3HKcQaOmeRM7FPKKYkFEcY0QYlMWcM7Ito4hwsXhSO6xp5OXL/l8KBOFHHFWnr38FWyF+N871IgIqvSQDGC6Lt0VmbOKIKwMIkL+hnhRHKZYvEIKNTblqUikYf00aMDfrnyT0KFNjqzbCxmKiyMDTsC6/Tn8PlznxpKrvxKyXgYE6LSuLAxHvnJwYUl2QFSV+Gh1Gzr5dmQEQ4umnL/8MTKQpoRv1jmCoo2AWoZD2p1OWYuVdolbloJH2YCtJyXXMp126lZNyJuWzcVc2Lo0IQ7glU2zG6QWf/PmsZoC0goIFr06xryN3t8keoHvcrc7r6tvktDDFhA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com;  s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=22GKoDRqPFm+B4aC0GrKB26Errbx6iFv0hG3oXJJDVs=; b=cW9k7/mKQRHxBrFMQTrw1NHh88sVa43kfjOIXRDH4HzV1c0r7+EVORU8Z7WONDn7W6cQgFO2UunMo7TPAgou4ocLVsAzoOcoyQdPC5DCnMcM0c0ab3pwiANOVreJhSsLntbXbPgUw54ZJaq9sGo9/ahtApWPi2hGP+qJXxJ+88T0A7QS302aiiszLNEkLr82TqsU2EVLI8hpzQC6q2UNjSI4bJmnvSJxq1e5nYs3Wd8kuxIaM4RvkFVZQspsCP+A53XQ0eejhJ7+8xuqkvBJkLL0dRZ665yfiaVFiB32BLftvfqTLCGjGy9hQQ9rjtcWEcEd1wza1gKcFfFHGBDeMg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=apnic.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=apnic.net; dkim=pass header.d=apnic.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.onmicrosoft.com;  s=selector2-apnic-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=22GKoDRqPFm+B4aC0GrKB26Errbx6iFv0hG3oXJJDVs=; b=cOmph60tPHotDJW8d9ByAfxQhhqEECidCb4kwk0QoaUp3Aw9nuM+ibe4csXmjD508l/U4MCyrVAFpDTCTb6fZhZrWWZKc/QWLnNTt32MTeqILKciDELOh07XMS2InA8LLJL9Vez/lc+Y2T7h1Ex3R3xDIM++P8v+3iJtbiCojWg=
Received: from PS1PR04MB2839.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (52.133.231.81) by PS1PR04MB2981.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (20.177.133.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2305.18; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 02:42:27 +0000
Received: from PS1PR04MB2839.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::11f0:f1bb:4493:7047]) by PS1PR04MB2839.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::11f0:f1bb:4493:7047%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2305.023; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 02:42:27 +0000
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
CC: George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>, "carlos@lacnic.net" <carlos@lacnic.net>, "tim@ripe.net" <tim@ripe.net>, "andy@arin.net" <andy@arin.net>, "daniel@afrinic.net" <daniel@afrinic.net>, "db3546@att.com" <db3546@att.com>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "martin.vigoureux@nokia.com" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, "morrowc@ops-netman.net" <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sandy@tislabs.com" <sandy@tislabs.com>, "housley@vigilsec.com" <housley@vigilsec.com>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8360 (5870)
Thread-Index: AQHVevHuFK6FCw/6ZkiD0LFPqe3FNqdLVx4A
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2019 02:42:27 +0000
Message-ID: <412C6C76-ED2A-4FE6-9B48-508DF0DDBD51@apnic.net>
References: <20191004202545.3FBF4B81D81@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20191004202545.3FBF4B81D81@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-AU, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-clientproxiedby: SYCPR01CA0042.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:10c6:10:e::30) To PS1PR04MB2839.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:803:40::17)
x-originating-ip: [2001:44b8:110b:5100:6cb1:68b0:190:b9da]
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=gih@apnic.net; 
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b9a1d7ab-1925-4892-50d1-08d7493da8bf
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PS1PR04MB2981:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <PS1PR04MB298142FBBCDEE53452AD31C8B8990@PS1PR04MB2981.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0181F4652A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39830400003)(396003)(136003)(366004)(376002)(346002)(189003)(199004)(7736002)(8676002)(186003)(446003)(6506007)(486006)(81166006)(76176011)(6916009)(305945005)(6246003)(52116002)(33656002)(53546011)(5660300002)(8936002)(6436002)(256004)(6486002)(19627235002)(25786009)(2616005)(6116002)(476003)(86362001)(11346002)(81156014)(229853002)(50226002)(7416002)(508600001)(54906003)(386003)(99286004)(66446008)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(71190400001)(71200400001)(4326008)(66946007)(14454004)(36756003)(6306002)(2906002)(316002)(6512007)(102836004)(46003)(966005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:PS1PR04MB2981; H:PS1PR04MB2839.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; 
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: apnic.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: iPj6BUFXuAb1lz2tsj/8d+l0BpMvfFborpV64Gt7ScaGYISxuBsVIfVwGzK8Li2yoqluQPbMOdWczrLZ1nEQNxbEXe8/vkyEpGu3MHz+JmD0LfI+1dnRB0GXGktGG1eI9c5UIVrTtyTaiV59N1cUs5uU/39pvmQ/zqmCzmpAE1GSOF/15kBkDTR4YgdQlR9c1eJ+9IKSBu2Y58pUgNBLnnxl8qpFpWb1CLUGJ37qofXuw8A3/1f2YZXdNLZXD9GY1rftsj2N29dOGbq7XvXS31oPY54n7hDvij7MqFc+eU8kG2XVPYk99hxScVXOygs+/9HL6nI0STQ7JMF5Y98IZaZxjfRaaXz0tGiHS0QV/jNzEkvi6DNR5VvJ9k/o//z313/OeZDx1euNrYLzA12uieu/ljvF52EDnG6ckvPWC5NZwfreaVxeuUw3xhfM2C87oxoscoigWnGrw194kIijvw==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <53CB1CEDEFB6C94BBF4FF06B199F569F@apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: apnic.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b9a1d7ab-1925-4892-50d1-08d7493da8bf
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Oct 2019 02:42:27.1636 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 127d8d0d-7ccf-473d-ab09-6e44ad752ded
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Q4z05yruRlNqL0AFmUj66NUznyUNwV/DoVM65yxQWxV3joInDTDzLFvpK4VbEA6Q
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS1PR04MB2981
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/pXNl3zGjhUTBUj-P84na-xSLisk>
Subject: Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8360 (5870)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2019 02:42:34 -0000

yep - that looks like a genuine error - well spotted Russ!

Geoff


> On 5 Oct 2019, at 6:25 am, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> =
wrote:
>=20
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8360,
> "Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation Reconsidered".
>=20
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5870
>=20
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
>=20
> Section: 4.2.3
>=20
> Original Text
> -------------
>       ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 EXTENSION ::=3D {
>         SYNTAX ASIdentifiers
>         IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2
>       }
>=20
>       id-pe-autonomousSysIds OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=3D { id-pe 29 }
>=20
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>       ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 EXTENSION ::=3D {
>         SYNTAX ASIdentifiers
>         IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2
>       }
>=20
>       id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=3D { id-pe 29 }
>=20
> Notes
> -----
> The "-v2" is missing from the identifier.  It is needed for the ASN.1 mod=
ule to compile properly.
>=20
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party =20
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.=20
>=20
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8360 (draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-10)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validatio=
n Reconsidered
> Publication Date    : April 2018
> Author(s)           : G. Huston, G. Michaelson, C. Martinez, T. Bruijnzee=
ls, A. Newton, D. Shaw
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG


From nobody Mon Oct  7 18:34:56 2019
Return-Path: <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05CCA12010F for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  7 Oct 2019 18:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.099
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IygMKltXa9A4 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  7 Oct 2019 18:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (relay.ops-netman.net [192.110.255.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30566120019 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon,  7 Oct 2019 18:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.ops-netman.net (mailserver.ops-netman.net [199.168.90.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEEC63FDBD; Tue,  8 Oct 2019 01:34:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from morrowc-glaptop2.ops-netman.net (unknown [IPv6:2606:700:e:30:fa59:71ff:febc:c58c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF436412; Tue,  8 Oct 2019 01:34:49 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 21:34:49 -0400
Message-ID: <yj9olftwrpdy.wl-morrowc@ops-netman.net>
From: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: gih@apnic.net, ggm@apnic.net, carlos@lacnic.net, tim@ripe.net, andy@arin.net, daniel@afrinic.net, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, morrowc@ops-netman.net, sandy@tislabs.com, housley@vigilsec.com, sidr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20191004202545.3FBF4B81D81@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20191004202545.3FBF4B81D81@rfc-editor.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Organization: Operations Network Management, Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/Q3uxsOrUDzw_h866EiGI4DbZ-VM>
Subject: Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8360 (5870)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 01:34:55 -0000

On Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:25:45 -0400,
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8360,
> "Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation Reconsidered".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5870
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
> 
> Section: 4.2.3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>        ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 EXTENSION ::= {
>          SYNTAX ASIdentifiers
>          IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2
>        }
> 
>        id-pe-autonomousSysIds OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pe 29 }
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>        ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 EXTENSION ::= {
>          SYNTAX ASIdentifiers
>          IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2
>        }
> 
>        id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pe 29 }
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The "-v2" is missing from the identifier.  It is needed for the ASN.1 module to compile properly.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 

seems legit.

> --------------------------------------
> RFC8360 (draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-10)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation Reconsidered
> Publication Date    : April 2018
> Author(s)           : G. Huston, G. Michaelson, C. Martinez, T. Bruijnzeels, A. Newton, D. Shaw
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG


From nobody Mon Oct  7 18:57:05 2019
Return-Path: <carlos@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBCE12010F for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  7 Oct 2019 18:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HdCLSRYLYH56 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  7 Oct 2019 18:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [200.7.84.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663FB120019 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon,  7 Oct 2019 18:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.lacnic.net.uy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E96116B40923; Mon,  7 Oct 2019 22:56:58 -0300 (UYT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lacnic.net.uy
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy ([127.0.0.1]) by hermes.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xJoF_FW4RJ9B; Mon,  7 Oct 2019 22:56:54 -0300 (UYT)
Received: from [54.210.254.174] (ec2-54-210-254-174.compute-1.amazonaws.com [54.210.254.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B519716B4091B; Mon,  7 Oct 2019 22:56:53 -0300 (UYT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----sinikael-?=_1-15704998114660.6178273779911425"
From: Carlos Martinez <carlos@lacnic.net>
To: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, gih@apnic.net, ggm@apnic.net, tim@ripe.net, andy@arin.net, daniel@afrinic.net, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, morrowc@ops-netman.net, sandy@tislabs.com, housley@vigilsec.com, sidr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <yj9olftwrpdy.wl-morrowc@ops-netman.net>
References: <20191004202545.3FBF4B81D81@rfc-editor.org> <yj9olftwrpdy.wl-morrowc@ops-netman.net>
Message-Id: <a9052e8e-0eca-416c-8005-dc3922c54a39@lacnic.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 20:56:35 -0500
X-Cm-Message-Id: 1570499796163760e15ea9f826e4308938b6764406bf20665d9becd4280611162961876
X-Cm-Draft-Id: WyJhIiw1LCJkcmFmdF9pZCIsMTU3MDQ5OTc5NTU0MSwidiIsMV0=
X-Mailer: Newton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/O-DnHZuB8uAfOGmA-XX1bv9wg2Y>
Subject: Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8360 (5870)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 01:57:03 -0000

------sinikael-?=_1-15704998114660.6178273779911425
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Indeed.


Sent from a mobile device. Mis disculpas. Enviado desde un dispositivo 
movil. On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 8:45pm, Chris Morrow < 
morrowc@ops-netman.net [morrowc@ops-netman.net] > wrote:
On Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:25:45 -0400,
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
 >
 > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8360,
 > "Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation Reconsidered".
 >
 > --------------------------------------
 > You may review the report below and at:
 > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5870
 >
 > --------------------------------------
 > Type: Technical
 > Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
 >
 > Section: 4.2.3
 >
 > Original Text
 > -------------
 > ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 EXTENSION ::= {
 > SYNTAX ASIdentifiers
 > IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2
 > }
 >
 > id-pe-autonomousSysIds OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pe 29 }
 >
 > Corrected Text
 > --------------
 > ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 EXTENSION ::= {
 > SYNTAX ASIdentifiers
 > IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2
 > }
 >
 > id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pe 29 }
 >
 > Notes
 > -----
 > The "-v2" is missing from the identifier. It is needed for the ASN.1 
module to compile properly.
 >
 > Instructions:
 > -------------
 > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
 > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
 > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
 > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
 >

seems legit.

 > --------------------------------------
 > RFC8360 (draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-10)
 > --------------------------------------
 > Title : Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation 
Reconsidered
 > Publication Date : April 2018
 > Author(s) : G. Huston, G. Michaelson, C. Martinez, T. Bruijnzeels, A. 
Newton, D. Shaw
 > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
 > Source : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
 > Area : Routing
 > Stream : IETF
 > Verifying Party : IESG
------sinikael-?=_1-15704998114660.6178273779911425
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;">Indeed. </p>
<br>
<div id=3D'cm_signature'> Sent from a mobile device. Mis disculpas. =
&nbsp;<div>Enviado desde un dispositivo movil.</div> </div><div =
class=3D"cm_quote">On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 8:45pm, Chris Morrow &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:morrowc@ops-netman.net">morrowc@ops-netman.net</a>&gt; =
wrote:</div><br><div id=3D"oldcontent" style=3D"background: rgb(255, 255, =
255);"><blockquote style=3D""><p dir=3D"ltr">On Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:25:45 =
-0400,<br>
RFC Errata System &lt;rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;=20<br>
&gt; The following errata report has been submitted for =
RFC8360,<br>
&gt; "Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation =
Reconsidered".<br>
&gt;=20<br>
&gt; -------------------------------------=
-<br>
&gt; You may review the report below and at:<br>
&gt; https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5870<br>
&gt;=20<br>
&gt; --------------------------------------<br>
&gt; Type: Technical<br>
&gt; Reported by: Russ Housley &lt;housley@vigilsec.=
com&gt;<br>
&gt;=20<br>
&gt; Section: 4.2.3<br>
&gt;=20<br>
&gt; Original Text<br>
&gt; -------------<br>
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp=
;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 EXTENSION ::=3D {<br>
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; SYNTAX =
ASIdentifiers<br>
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p; IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2<br>
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp=
;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; }<br>
&gt;=20<br>
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&=
nbsp;&nbsp; id-pe-autonomousSysIds OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=3D { id-pe 29 =
}<br>
&gt;=20<br>
&gt; Corrected Text<br>
&gt; --------------<br>
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 =
EXTENSION ::=3D {<br>
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=
&nbsp; SYNTAX ASIdentifiers<br>
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n=
bsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2<br>
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; }<br>
&gt;=20<br>
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 =
OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=3D { id-pe 29 }<br>
&gt;=20<br>
&gt; Notes<br>
&gt; -----<br>
&gt; The "-v2" is missing from the identifier.&nbsp; It is =
needed for the ASN.1 module to compile properly.<br>
&gt;=20<br>
&gt; Instructions:<br>
&gt; -------------<br>
&gt; This erratum is =
currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please<br>
&gt; use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or<br>
&gt; rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying =
party&nbsp;=20<br>
&gt; can log in to change the status and edit the =
report, if necessary.=20<br>
&gt;=20<br>
<br>
seems legit.<br>
<br>
&gt; --------------------------------------<br>
&gt; RFC8360 =
(draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-10)<br>
&gt; --------------------------------------<br>
&gt; =
Title&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp; : Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation =
Reconsidered<br>
&gt; Publication Date&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : April 2018<br>
&gt; Author(s)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
: G. Huston, G. Michaelson, C. Martinez, T. Bruijnzeels, A. Newton, D. =
Shaw<br>
&gt; Category&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp; : PROPOSED STANDARD<br>
&gt; Source&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : Secure =
Inter-Domain Routing<br>
&gt; Area&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : Routing<br>
&gt; Stream&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbs=
p;&nbsp;&nbsp; : IETF<br>
&gt; Verifying Party&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; : =
IESG<br>
</p>
</blockquote></div>
------sinikael-?=_1-15704998114660.6178273779911425--


From nobody Tue Oct  8 12:16:39 2019
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD921200D6; Tue,  8 Oct 2019 12:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UB_hL-BQNFTF; Tue,  8 Oct 2019 12:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D60E81200E6; Tue,  8 Oct 2019 12:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 05FF4B818FA; Tue,  8 Oct 2019 12:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
To: housley@vigilsec.com, gih@apnic.net, ggm@apnic.net, carlos@lacnic.net, tim@ripe.net, andy@arin.net, daniel@afrinic.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: warren@kumari.net, iesg@ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20191008191620.05FF4B818FA@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue,  8 Oct 2019 12:16:20 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/Hv8kYfAeonNwCCzaanKYVjASEqY>
Subject: [sidr] [Errata Verified] RFC8360 (5870)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 19:16:30 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC8360,
"Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation Reconsidered". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5870

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Date Reported: 2019-10-04
Verified by: Warren Kumari (Ops AD) (IESG)

Section: 4.2.3

Original Text
-------------
       ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 EXTENSION ::= {
         SYNTAX ASIdentifiers
         IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2
       }

       id-pe-autonomousSysIds OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pe 29 }

Corrected Text
--------------
       ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 EXTENSION ::= {
         SYNTAX ASIdentifiers
         IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2
       }

       id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pe 29 }

Notes
-----
The "-v2" is missing from the identifier.  It is needed for the ASN.1 module to compile properly.

--------------------------------------
RFC8360 (draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation Reconsidered
Publication Date    : April 2018
Author(s)           : G. Huston, G. Michaelson, C. Martinez, T. Bruijnzeels, A. Newton, D. Shaw
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG


From nobody Wed Oct 23 09:24:33 2019
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF54C120289 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 09:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wWYmjEaFipLl for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 09:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5275D1200A3 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 09:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2582CF40739; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 09:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
To: mlepinski@bbn.com, skent@bbn.com, dkong@bbn.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, morrowc@ops-netman.net, sandy@tislabs.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: housley@vigilsec.com, sidr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20191023162426.2582CF40739@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 09:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/5HtlrmKwuB4Ne4iVNJtSJ3m2TMw>
Subject: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6482 (5881)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:24:32 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6482,
"A Profile for Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5881

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>

Section: Appendix A

Original Text
-------------
   END


Corrected Text
--------------
   id-ct-routeOriginAuthz OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 1 2 840 113549 1 9 16 1 24 }

   END


Notes
-----
The object identifier for the ROA content type is mentioned in the document, but it is not included in the ASN.1 Module.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6482 (draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-12)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A Profile for Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs)
Publication Date    : February 2012
Author(s)           : M. Lepinski, S. Kent, D. Kong
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG


From nobody Wed Oct 23 22:19:45 2019
Return-Path: <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951D212020A for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 22:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.689
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.689 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-d_t_IUZXvs for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 22:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.ops-netman.net (relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net [IPv6:2606:700:e:550:5c82:28ff:fe4c:9503]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D541012000F for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 22:19:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.ops-netman.net (mailserver.ops-netman.net [199.168.90.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 854223C2302; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:19:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mailserver.ops-netman.net.ops-netman.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55A837F0; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:19:39 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:19:39 +0000
Message-ID: <874kzyiutw.wl-morrowc@ops-netman.net>
From: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: mlepinski@bbn.com, skent@bbn.com, dkong@bbn.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, morrowc@ops-netman.net, sandy@tislabs.com, housley@vigilsec.com, sidr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20191023162426.2582CF40739@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20191023162426.2582CF40739@rfc-editor.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Organization: Operations Network Management, Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/oqSXU4oOgYvxAq91NXK6fRkhhLo>
Subject: Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6482 (5881)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:19:43 -0000

this seems legit.

On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:24:26 +0000,
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6482,
> "A Profile for Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5881
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
> 
> Section: Appendix A
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    END
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    id-ct-routeOriginAuthz OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 1 2 840 113549 1 9 16 1 24 }
> 
>    END
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The object identifier for the ROA content type is mentioned in the document, but it is not included in the ASN.1 Module.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6482 (draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-12)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : A Profile for Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs)
> Publication Date    : February 2012
> Author(s)           : M. Lepinski, S. Kent, D. Kong
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG


From nobody Thu Oct 24 11:05:06 2019
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD171200E3; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 47SFxl-EIMvA; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B6331200B2; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id F2E21F40713; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: housley@vigilsec.com, mlepinski@bbn.com, skent@bbn.com, dkong@bbn.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: warren@kumari.net, iesg@ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20191024180455.F2E21F40713@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/fc8LneUx9Gy49i51wSpsDoW66zg>
Subject: [sidr] [Errata Verified] RFC6482 (5881)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 18:05:04 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC6482,
"A Profile for Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs)". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5881

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Date Reported: 2019-10-23
Verified by: Warren Kumari (Ops AD) (IESG)

Section: Appendix A

Original Text
-------------
   END


Corrected Text
--------------
   id-ct-routeOriginAuthz OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 1 2 840 113549 1 9 16 1 24 }

   END


Notes
-----
The object identifier for the ROA content type is mentioned in the document, but it is not included in the ASN.1 Module.

--------------------------------------
RFC6482 (draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-12)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A Profile for Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs)
Publication Date    : February 2012
Author(s)           : M. Lepinski, S. Kent, D. Kong
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

