From nobody Mon Jun 5 03:45:08 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471901250B8 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 03:42:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.62 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailforce.net header.b=VBZuyoq4; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Tf3wgQSN Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJgOAd8aGFPr for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 03:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93185120724 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 03:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8912A20B65; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 06:42:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 05 Jun 2017 06:42:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailforce.net; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=CT3ssF M09ugnuuFVGzWTPFHWhvzyCtU4lnzLusgB4Ok=; b=VBZuyoq4jXsO0Ndg9R4ViE +o3KLD8Rh0DnSjp88f6d3frBB6NA7iuMCE3XgYojV+Me2AxeZq0DOs1vTm6BgQg8 TTNwYata5O2WmAvl8Vl529ssPdM237FQxXxcMuydf3aq8dnx0vSzqy68LymYNtsd NmlJS2TZHm6cvjNNTs4WOt5PK7WGfxBdZxmG/eNb5TEnI8j0VtOoqjppcMAm5Bji 2QXc7eoMeRSLQVCyuwplk7ptad+rAxmDUiJeW3kBCZf1ToZoxf6C2RVMrwKPZvpe y6E2QiwsOpOqZFbckq0w8HWM3GnB7GOdb5JXCNhGgTSvjcO+/tvdcCgj2ty/pq5w == DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=CT3ssFM09ugnuuFVGzWTPFHWhvzyCtU4lnzLusgB4Ok=; b=Tf3wgQSN WG00mjZFnnYKOGQe+Ti+0gIzYtpw1sFrE5uB7hJ96j3z/TE7+sTSEGX/R6SdMiuw FD5kB0WMeNMa8QpDSum1973Ielx2H7K2xe78xHO/X+vYXmgkZTYStvasUmhCuVNY voyIrukdWv0z1lmW8cLo9fK3T0M/aKeJxwsIrZTiViDLMvrHVBN2CXXXfS8jbAKk XbNKbUoRF27gmgfwOYloPnpDVuXxuUBiVZug9c3DjUfVFnHIu4XPrWR5sJfbyKlL ffOAL4G5vhHEez6P+GiI8dOYyaGX47XhyxF1X9G20kPs75MCEyg4nc4Nx5PESck5 pzbIrySZFpW68A== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: LCb4o550E8RW1+gqo/sYLx4gHwiAG2nXmLIZpFRAnf0K 1496659330 Received: from [10.251.88.159] (29.sub-97-45-70.myvzw.com [97.45.70.29]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1690F7E850; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 06:42:10 -0400 (EDT) References: <20170511000521.5100EB812F9@rfc-editor.org> <1494489592.5978.3.camel@ifi.uio.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <1494489592.5978.3.camel@ifi.uio.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <631D2029-41E8-4392-933A-B495558645CA@glyphein.mailforce.net> Cc: RFC Errata System , ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, cyrus@daboo.name, aaron@serendipity.cx, sieve@ietf.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13B143) From: Stan Kalisch Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 06:42:07 -0400 To: Kjetil Torgrim Homme Archived-At: Subject: Re: [sieve] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5229 (5015) X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SIEVE Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 10:42:15 -0000 Apologies for the lateness of this reply. > On May 11, 2017, at 3:59 AM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wr= ote: >=20 > on. den 10. 05. 2017 klokka 17.05 (-0700) skreiv RFC Errata System: >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5015 >>=20 >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Stan Kalisch >>=20 >> Section: 3.2 >>=20 >> Original Text >> ------------- >> # Imagine the header >> # Subject: [acme-users] [fwd] version 1.0 is out >> if header :matches "Subject" "[*] *" { >> # will hold "acme-users", >> # will hold "[fwd] version 1.0 is out" >> fileinfo "INBOX.lists."; stop; >> } >>=20 >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> # Imagine the header >> # Subject: [acme-users] [fwd] version 1.0 is out >> if header :matches "Subject" "[*] *" { >> # will hold "acme-users", >> # will hold "[fwd] version 1.0 is out" >> fileinto "INBOX.lists."; stop; >> } >>=20 >> Notes >> ----- >> This suggestion corrects the spelling of the "fileinto" action in the exa= mple. >=20 > mea culpa! the fix is correct. >=20 > aside: it is interesting that the mail copy of this notification has > removed the "${1}" and "${2}" from the text. it is correct in the web > version. I noticed the omissions still existed in the emailed notification of the ver= ification of the errata. Does anyone know if the cause of this has been fix= ed? Stan= From nobody Mon Jun 12 22:23:55 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29997129B34 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:23:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03s7woArWI7o for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51972129B33 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06ACA1CA422; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:23:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 325HgunE4itr; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:23:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.11] (cpe-76-168-191-223.socal.res.rr.com [76.168.191.223]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9A8151CA393; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:23:42 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) From: Megan Ferguson In-Reply-To: <631D2029-41E8-4392-933A-B495558645CA@glyphein.mailforce.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 22:23:51 -0700 Cc: Kjetil Torgrim Homme , RFC System , ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, cyrus@daboo.name, aaron@serendipity.cx, sieve@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <023F77E5-C5E0-40A0-B625-7A70A92D333B@amsl.com> References: <20170511000521.5100EB812F9@rfc-editor.org> <1494489592.5978.3.camel@ifi.uio.no> <631D2029-41E8-4392-933A-B495558645CA@glyphein.mailforce.net> To: Stan Kalisch X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [sieve] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5229 (5015) X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SIEVE Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 05:23:54 -0000 Hi Stan, Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We are aware of this bug = in the mails=20 created and plan to fix it. We will add this case to testing. RFC Editor/mf On Jun 5, 2017, at 3:42 AM, Stan Kalisch = wrote: > Apologies for the lateness of this reply. >=20 >> On May 11, 2017, at 3:59 AM, Kjetil Torgrim Homme = wrote: >>=20 >> on. den 10. 05. 2017 klokka 17.05 (-0700) skreiv RFC Errata System: >>> You may review the report below and at: >>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5015 >>>=20 >>> -------------------------------------- >>> Type: Technical >>> Reported by: Stan Kalisch >>>=20 >>> Section: 3.2 >>>=20 >>> Original Text >>> ------------- >>> # Imagine the header >>> # Subject: [acme-users] [fwd] version 1.0 is out >>> if header :matches "Subject" "[*] *" { >>> # will hold "acme-users", >>> # will hold "[fwd] version 1.0 is out" >>> fileinfo "INBOX.lists."; stop; >>> } >>>=20 >>> Corrected Text >>> -------------- >>> # Imagine the header >>> # Subject: [acme-users] [fwd] version 1.0 is out >>> if header :matches "Subject" "[*] *" { >>> # will hold "acme-users", >>> # will hold "[fwd] version 1.0 is out" >>> fileinto "INBOX.lists."; stop; >>> } >>>=20 >>> Notes >>> ----- >>> This suggestion corrects the spelling of the "fileinto" action in = the example. >>=20 >> mea culpa! the fix is correct. >>=20 >> aside: it is interesting that the mail copy of this notification has >> removed the "${1}" and "${2}" from the text. it is correct in the = web >> version. >=20 > I noticed the omissions still existed in the emailed notification of = the verification of the errata. Does anyone know if the cause of this = has been fixed? >=20 >=20 > Stan