Subject: [Simple] Multiparty MSRP-02 submitted

From: "Geir Arne Sandbakken" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:58:38 +0100

The current draft still does not make nicknames mandatory to be
backwards compatible with clients not supporting this draft.  

Changelog:
- Usage of the term "reservation" used more persistent 
- Removed "Conference Server" terminology to stick with RFC4353's
- Removed the Nickname Provider URI which is no longer used to make the
nickname unambiguous.
- Nickname string is now at least unique inside that chat room
(conference instance), but a wider unambiguous scope might be applied by
the focus like domain or server.
- Added some text about Privacy usage
- Participant URI terminology removed
- Rewrote the nickname section to fit the new semantics
- Added a section to explain backward compatible issues and reference
issues when nicknames are not allowed

_______________________________________________
Simple mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple