From vkg@bell-labs.com Fri Jun 3 14:22:41 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C35E07D0 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:22:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.549 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eQlQ+Y7ypDGA for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:22:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9885BE07CA for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:22:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.9]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id p53LMXgO027781 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:22:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id p53LMWxt024127 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:22:33 -0500 Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.235]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id p53LMW6u015151; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 16:22:32 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DE950A5.8080500@bell-labs.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:22:45 -0500 From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Musgrave , "Elwell, John" References: <20110418143004.807.72505.idtracker@ietfc.amsl.com> <8CB1F01A-91E7-4A02-A984-718AEC84EE0B@magorcorp.com> <96B28772-470F-4010-A372-7432A43CBB0F@magorcorp.com> In-Reply-To: <96B28772-470F-4010-A372-7432A43CBB0F@magorcorp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.9 Cc: sip-clf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [sip-clf] WGLC:draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-06.txt X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 21:22:41 -0000 Peter, John: Thank you for reviewing draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-06 as part of WGLC. I am attending to both of your comments, as follows. Regarding Peter's comments in [1], I have put the following normative text for the From/To headers: For the sake of brevity, URI parameters SHOULD NOT be logged. Also in [1], Peter asks whether it is necessary to indicate UAS-half and UAC-half. I think it is best to leave them as stated, especially since in Table 1 there is a bit of a difference in how the UAS- and UAC-half treat a couple of headers (c.f., {Server-,Client-}Txn in the table). If you can suggest a better suffix instead of "half", I can easily use that. Finally in [1], regarding URI parameters MUST be logged: I have left the text as it currently appears in the draft ("The Request-URI, including any URI parameters.") I think it is self-explanatory, but if anyone wants me to put normative language there, I can do so. Regarding Peter's comments in [2], the To URI should be the same as R-URI since it is a direct call. I will make that change. Regarding John's comments in [3], I agree and have took the sentence that mentions the tag out. I will issue a new revision early next week. [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00497.html [2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00499.html [3] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00498.html Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ From musgravepj@gmail.com Sat Jun 4 14:55:27 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3808621F84F9 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:55:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d9dlUthsBfqC for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E594621F84D0 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so2108289fxm.31 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 14:55:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jqJuZXNokE9n7/iNbXziS+DNwMX+clTt9YI8enH2zyg=; b=c/YFpAohpYQO+XEmXSiRVOeDOtBRqYLghiHHNkk73AG71I0vFQFVlF/H6Ejt8ck3ml LQJZCul4Twh/Sa4DoTwJc9oRtpZdc/XJguML/95bMLok4orjtLXI5kPta42IQ4olpRvX c7UVanJ/JidLc6E07Pfk6NriLV1SSZpTaRcWU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mZXAdOG00rIIdDM//T6agpkfMbQZH/lE7O4YFezbTbevi3V/x3CI+LNGv8z3GAreKt t80FBYDRQmwHrKwx/wUv1ian3MRAzOau+X8SY79AqCJ9Oh2exxyj3GM02XrmvamUVwOE 8pF6KaXQxuLaz2PCfuWhkdZ3wBOVG2VrzjxZI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.14.137 with SMTP id g9mr1583388faa.8.1307224521919; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 14:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.143.71 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:55:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DE950A5.8080500@bell-labs.com> References: <20110418143004.807.72505.idtracker@ietfc.amsl.com> <8CB1F01A-91E7-4A02-A984-718AEC84EE0B@magorcorp.com> <96B28772-470F-4010-A372-7432A43CBB0F@magorcorp.com> <4DE950A5.8080500@bell-labs.com> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:55:21 -0400 Message-ID: From: Peter Musgrave To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747af3e454b9104a4e9ed0f Cc: sip-clf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [sip-clf] WGLC:draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-06.txt X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 21:55:27 -0000 --00151747af3e454b9104a4e9ed0f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Vijay. Once we have the doc I will start the wheels turning to get this on to the next step... Peter On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > Peter, John: Thank you for reviewing > draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-06 as part of WGLC. > > I am attending to both of your comments, as follows. > > Regarding Peter's comments in [1], I have put the following > normative text for the From/To headers: > > For the sake of brevity, URI parameters SHOULD NOT be logged. > > Also in [1], Peter asks whether it is necessary to indicate > UAS-half and UAC-half. I think it is best to leave them as > stated, especially since in Table 1 there is a bit of a > difference in how the UAS- and UAC-half treat a couple of > headers (c.f., {Server-,Client-}Txn in the table). > > If you can suggest a better suffix instead of "half", I can > easily use that. > > Finally in [1], regarding URI parameters MUST be logged: I > have left the text as it currently appears in the draft > ("The Request-URI, including any URI parameters.") I think > it is self-explanatory, but if anyone wants me to put > normative language there, I can do so. > > Regarding Peter's comments in [2], the To URI should be the > same as R-URI since it is a direct call. I will make that > change. > > Regarding John's comments in [3], I agree and have took the > sentence that mentions the tag out. > > I will issue a new revision early next week. > > [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00497.html > [2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00499.html > [3] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00498.html > > Thanks, > > - vijay > -- > Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent > 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA) > Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com > Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ > --00151747af3e454b9104a4e9ed0f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =A0Thanks Vijay.=A0

Once we have the doc I will start th= e wheels turning to get this on to the next step...

Peter

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:2= 2 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani <vkg@bell-labs.com> wrote:
Peter, John: Thank you for reviewing
draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-06 as part of WGLC.

I am attending to both of your comments, as follows.

Regarding Peter's comments in [1], I have put the following
normative text for the From/To headers:

=A0For the sake of brevity, URI parameters SHOULD NOT be logged.

Also in [1], Peter asks whether it is necessary to indicate
UAS-half and UAC-half. =A0I think it is best to leave them as
stated, especially since in Table 1 there is a bit of a
difference in how the UAS- and UAC-half treat a couple of
headers (c.f., {Server-,Client-}Txn in the table).

If you can suggest a better suffix instead of "half", I can
easily use that.

Finally in [1], regarding URI parameters MUST be logged: I
have left the text as it currently appears in the draft
("The Request-URI, including any URI parameters.") =A0I think
it is self-explanatory, but if anyone wants me to put
normative language there, I can do so.

Regarding Peter's comments in [2], the To URI should be the
same as R-URI since it is a direct call. =A0I will make that
change.

Regarding John's comments in [3], I agree and have took the
sentence that mentions the tag out.

I will issue a new revision early next week.

[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/curr= ent/msg00497.html
[2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/curr= ent/msg00499.html
[3] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/curr= ent/msg00498.html

Thanks,

- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.co= m,acm.org} / vijay.gurban= i@alcatel-lucent.com
Web: =A0 ht= tp://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/

--00151747af3e454b9104a4e9ed0f-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Jun 6 06:59:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA35211E814A; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 06:59:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.549 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PCmNqI4wvnRS; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 06:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8689811E80F7; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 06:59:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.55 Message-ID: <20110606135906.30131.87366.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 06:59:06 -0700 Cc: sip-clf@ietf.org Subject: [sip-clf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07.txt X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:59:07 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the SIP Common Log Format Working Group o= f the IETF. Title : The Common Log Format (CLF) for the Session Initiation P= rotocol (SIP) Author(s) : Vijay K. Gurbani Eric W. Burger Tricha Anjali Humberto Abdelnur Olivier Festor Filename : draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07.txt Pages : 34 Date : 2011-06-06 Well-known web servers such as Apache and web proxies like Squid support event logging using a common log format. The logs produced using these de-facto standard formats are invaluable to system administrators for trouble-shooting a server and tool writers to craft tools that mine the log files and produce reports and trends. Furthermore, these log files can also be used to train anomaly detection systems and feed events into a security event management system. The Session Initiation Protocol does not have a common log format, and as a result, each server supports a distinct log format that makes it unnecessarily complex to produce tools to do trend analysis and security detection. We propose a common log file format for SIP servers that can be used uniformly by proxies, registrars, redirect servers as well as back-to-back user agents. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07.= txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07.t= xt From vkg@bell-labs.com Mon Jun 6 07:06:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168B911E811E for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:06:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dZqTOo8-9uyQ for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:06:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341AA11E80F7 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.12]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id p56E6XX4013736 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:06:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id p56E6XoH007978 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:06:33 -0500 Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.235]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id p56E6XHN021223 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:06:33 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DECDEF9.8070307@bell-labs.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:06:49 -0500 From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "sip-clf@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.12 Subject: [sip-clf] draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07 X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:06:36 -0000 Folks: I have released -07 of the SIPCLF problem statement. This version includes the WGLC comments as outlined in [1]. [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00502.html [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07 [3] http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07.txt The draft is ready to be moved ahead. Thank you all for review comments and feedback. Regards, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ From vkg@bell-labs.com Mon Jun 6 07:08:06 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECE111E811E for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:08:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y8dpbr8FXMpv for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:08:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC25811E80F7 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:08:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.11]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id p56E82CT015808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:08:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id p56E82us011213 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:08:02 -0500 Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.235]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id p56E82bk022437 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:08:02 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4DECDF51.3080909@bell-labs.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:08:17 -0500 From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "sip-clf@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.11 Subject: [sip-clf] draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07 X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:08:06 -0000 Sorry, fast fingered the "Send" key. Folks: I have released -07 of the SIPCLF problem statement. This version includes the WGLC comments as outlined in [1]. The -07 draft is available at [2], and the diffs from -06 in [3]. [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf/current/msg00502.html [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07 [3] http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07.txt The draft is ready to be moved ahead. Thank you all for review comments and feedback. Regards, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ From musgravepj@gmail.com Sun Jun 26 06:49:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E1E21F84DF for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:49:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.281 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.349, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01ZQYsIQQLaT for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2A921F8455 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:49:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so1544591fxe.27 for ; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:49:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VgpwD3xZpgj2uLy/q9ER4cA+xO2NYhvgXw8m23hfo1w=; b=jvdSvoQH3vURIgBTflCSDNIxCJKgqTSMur2HaVqJUwwjL1gXhM1GSuuIkAzsbhzAQ6 +d9k3Xn9rGXn0x30hL5Yq0Qkq63yQHqqSWXj482cChlK46J/N6mVOAc1q/wfm8FXZaJv TOaCf3zSZtGh334+C3NeiWnSNC4rWe9L32U+c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=xNfDoilywv+80dRmFefJveX53oCSnkXTVoSLK/CB22SrqmOxQfrJXK/BnL0rY1sxcm exf9U+K/Ce3N7FPXGC2WW+gRy2UOibx5PVenO16ZEIUaiMQAyWqI0T4u440IOlYAuOmA Er+qT+oUWGD3PQK/iEjUkRTLwKuyCqjaxzgzU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.94.78 with SMTP id y14mr7371350fam.24.1309096189458; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:49:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.109.3 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 06:49:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DECDEF9.8070307@bell-labs.com> References: <4DECDEF9.8070307@bell-labs.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:49:49 -0400 Message-ID: From: Peter Musgrave To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3054a8275979d404a69db500 Cc: "sip-clf@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [sip-clf] draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07 X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:49:51 -0000 --20cf3054a8275979d404a69db500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I will do a final read through and start sheparding this doc over the next week. Apologies for the delay. Peter (as chair) On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > Folks: I have released -07 of the SIPCLF problem statement. > > This version includes the WGLC comments as outlined in [1]. > > [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-**archive/web/sip-clf/current/**msg00502.html > [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/**draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-**statement-07 > [3] http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?**url2=draft-ietf-sipclf-** > problem-statement-07.txt > > The draft is ready to be moved ahead. > > Thank you all for review comments and feedback. > > Regards, > > - vijay > -- > Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent > 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA) > Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.**com > Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/**vkg/ > ______________________________**_________________ > sip-clf mailing list > sip-clf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/sip-clf > --20cf3054a8275979d404a69db500 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I will do a final read through and start sheparding this doc over the next = week.=A0

Apologies for the delay.=A0

Peter
(as chair)

On Mon, = Jun 6, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani <vkg@bell-labs.com> wrote:
Folks: I have released -07 of the SIPCLF pr= oblem statement.

This version includes the WGLC comments as outlined in [1].

[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-c= lf/current/msg00502.html
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipcl= f-problem-statement-07
[3] http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement-07.txt

The draft is ready to be moved ahead.

Thank you all for review comments and feedback.

Regards,

- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.co= m,acm.org} / vijay.gurban= i@alcatel-lucent.com
Web: =A0 ht= tp://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
_______________________________________________
sip-clf mailing list
sip-clf@ietf.org<= br> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf

--20cf3054a8275979d404a69db500--