From nobody Fri Oct 10 11:01:52 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AA11A907F; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:01:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xqz7CHdXjxcx; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3995C1A90F7; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:01:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.3.p4 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141010180147.30821.11291.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:01:47 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sip-overload/fao0RVVHmWV_JIrzJepRoMxnwoA Cc: sip-overload@ietf.org Subject: [sip-overload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-10.txt X-BeenThere: sip-overload@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: SIP Overload List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:01:49 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the SIP Overload Control Working Group of the IETF. Title : Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Rate Control Authors : Eric Noel Philip M. Williams Filename : draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-10.txt Pages : 16 Date : 2014-10-10 Abstract: The prevalent use of Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) in Next Generation Networks necessitates that SIP networks provide adequate control mechanisms to maintain transaction throughput by preventing congestion collapse during traffic overloads. Already a loss-based solution to remedy known vulnerabilities of the SIP 503 (service unavailable) overload control mechanism has been proposed. This document proposes a rate-based control scheme to complement the loss-based control scheme, using the same signaling. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Oct 10 11:06:15 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9CC1A6F60; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:06:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.986 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qLF4u43vwV7u; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B0F71A6EE6; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:06:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 31028345.0.2764603.00-2081.7781377.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:06:12 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 543820147f2db4cf-6ba03b640a526e808616723be2f63c1bc937505c Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9AI6AKE006762; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:06:11 -0400 Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9AI65T0006696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:06:08 -0400 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAB.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAB.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.146]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:05:49 GMT Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRDC.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.3.242]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAB.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.146]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:05:48 -0400 From: "NOEL, ERIC C" To: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" , "i-d-announce@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [sip-overload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-10.txt Thread-Index: AQHP5LRU36mUh6CNNEmS53D/Asmep5wpn1qA Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:05:48 +0000 Message-ID: <432544DCDB78E046B9E22D0EE8F41903010A4DDD@MISOUT7MSGUSRDC.ITServices.sbc.com> References: <20141010180147.30821.11291.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20141010180147.30821.11291.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.91.97.116] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=dshs/Sc4 c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=no7Oisa4l3IA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=kj9] X-AnalysisOut: [zAlcOel0A:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32RAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUA] X-AnalysisOut: [AAA:8 a=aKQWDH9By2Hq6IqZmIcA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=QYbaF5L] X-AnalysisOut: [xmtMA:10 a=Hz7IrDYlS0cA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10] X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24] Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sip-overload/0s2c0U1gfDcJID052rmdNT3C2tE Cc: "sip-overload@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [sip-overload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-10.txt X-BeenThere: sip-overload@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SIP Overload List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 18:06:14 -0000 Folks, Please make a not we just posted the latest version of draft-ietf-soc-overl= oad-rate-control-10. The revision includes comments from Janet Gunn, Richard Barnes and Peter Ye= e. Thanks, Eric Noel=20 AT&T Labs, Inc.=20 Rethink Possible Optimization, Reliability and Customer Analytics 200 South Laurel Avenue, D5-3D19 Middletown, NJ 07748 P: 732.420.4174 ecnoel@att.com -----Original Message----- From: sip-overload [mailto:sip-overload-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of inte= rnet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 2:02 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: sip-overload@ietf.org Subject: [sip-overload] I-D Action: draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-10= .txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the SIP Overload Control Working Group of the= IETF. Title : Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Rate Control Authors : Eric Noel Philip M. Williams Filename : draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-10.txt Pages : 16 Date : 2014-10-10 Abstract: The prevalent use of Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) in Next Generation Networks necessitates that SIP networks provide adequate control mechanisms to maintain transaction throughput by preventing congestion collapse during traffic overloads. Already a loss-based solution to remedy known vulnerabilities of the SIP 503 (service unavailable) overload control mechanism has been proposed. This document proposes a rate-based control scheme to complement the loss-based control scheme, using the same signaling. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ sip-overload mailing list sip-overload@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-overload From nobody Mon Oct 20 13:42:31 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip-overload@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD531ACE4F; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:42:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74awHjONep82; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C148E1ACE5F; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:42:21 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.4.p1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20141020204221.8850.53676.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 13:42:21 -0700 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sip-overload/_uiCeqN4EuaMFJ9wdAynrLgVfVo Cc: soc chair , soc mailing list , RFC Editor Subject: [sip-overload] Protocol Action: 'Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Rate Control' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-10.txt) X-BeenThere: sip-overload@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: SIP Overload List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:42:27 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Rate Control' (draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control-10.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the SIP Overload Control Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Richard Barnes and Alissa Cooper. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-soc-overload-rate-control/ Technical Summary: The document defines a rate-based overload control mechanism for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) to prevent signaling overload. It uses the framework defined in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Overload Control specification and adds the specifications needed for a rate-based control mechanism. With this specification, SIP entities can choose between the loss-based overload control defined in Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Overload Control and the rate-based overload control defined in this specification. Working Group Summary: The developement of this document resulted from a discussion in the WG on the overload feedback type (the pro's and con's of the feedback types discussed in Section 9. of RFC 6357). The WG decided to use loss-based control as the default mechanism in draft-ietf-soc-overload-control but allow extensions for other feedback types. Rate-based control was agreed as a needed extension as it has benefits in some scenarios. This draft provides the needed specifications for rate-based overload control. This draft was non-controversial and was is substantial interest in this specification. There was no competing proposal and it addresses the WG deliverable 'A specification for an SIP overload control mechanism based on implicit/explicit feedback' Document Quality: The basic mechanisms defined in this specification have been implemented and evaluated in several simulators as part of the work of the SIPPING Overload Control Design Team. The results of these evaluations were presented in several SIPPING WG meetings. The document has been reviewed several times as it has been developed by several members of the SOC WG including Salvatore Loreto, Janet Gunn, Christer Holmberg, James Yu, Keith Drage and Vijay Gurbani. Personnel: Shepherd: Volker Hilt AD: Richard Barnes