From mahesh.awaradi@globaledgesoft.com Tue Dec 1 21:14:22 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BC828C13D for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 21:14:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.605 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RELAY_IS_203=0.994] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wZ8R+DNiJLyx for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 21:14:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from gesmail.globaledgesoft.com (gesmail.globaledgesoft.com [203.76.137.4]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA58B28C13B for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 21:14:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mahesh_awaradi.globaledgesoft.com [172.16.7.101]) by gesmail.globaledgesoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF99117B425 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:44:08 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <4B15F7C5.8020505@globaledgesoft.com> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:44:45 +0530 From: Mahesh User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sip@ietf.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Sip] 182 call queued X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:14:22 -0000 Hi All , Can any body tell me 182 call queued packet format. Regards Mahesh From abhatnagar192006@gmail.com Tue Dec 1 23:28:38 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BD73A6A32 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:28:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AMjgKN2950Wk for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:28:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f223.google.com (mail-bw0-f223.google.com [209.85.218.223]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3D43A69EE for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:28:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so4245837bwz.29 for ; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:28:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6zEVvNY1XAESqaHggBCMYr76vLA9ruVeRIPAHcrXdBk=; b=Rqlk6SSeDYjymB/HweXZaHc6Ld0DNd7Hrpejuz1bNgvqmQZSgvXLKftzK4SyjNwrJJ 1mAvuwyNsA7sI0nZ90tg1jsy9t6e6AQ6QPOZlx00bnP5SFZiHXjEpvVrdz4Rg7/tVrii Y3lpN4FBUFcyS/xIuVfb8hdmLWCaFSH1pkUNE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=JeNdfVc/ecf3LFT7UnDSY0eEV9T9d/ZXRxw3rvOl22OSk5EMfgmMN0KaCrb7vLKBDm /WH99QnWYutDAG3q8gAwgF8a3ghYHmod+/mhJlh9J3r/TVZ7pR2M8adUYI9nttRp/eaP pQ6e6mG18gZk/bNohhAeMX6HuYCJRBe8rPsH4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.5.75 with SMTP id 11mr7095491bku.20.1259738902046; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:28:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B15F7C5.8020505@globaledgesoft.com> References: <4B15F7C5.8020505@globaledgesoft.com> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:58:21 +0030 Message-ID: From: aayush bhatnagar To: Mahesh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: sip@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sip] 182 call queued X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:28:38 -0000 What do you mean when you say 'packet format' ? The message structure ? On 02/12/2009, Mahesh wrote: > Hi All , > Can any body tell me 182 call queued packet format. > > Regards > Mahesh > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip > -- aayush http://in.linkedin.com/in/abhatnagar19 ====== From dworley@nortel.com Wed Dec 2 14:27:27 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8933A699D for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:27:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iCiN8PK-kk7S for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:27:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from zcars04e.nortel.com (zcars04e.nortel.com [47.129.242.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CFA3A6998 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:27:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com (casmtp.ca.nortel.com [47.140.202.46]) by zcars04e.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id nB2MRA503493; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 22:27:10 GMT Received: from [47.16.90.165] ([47.16.90.165]) by zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:27:09 -0500 From: "Dale Worley" To: Mahesh In-Reply-To: <4B15F7C5.8020505@globaledgesoft.com> References: <4B15F7C5.8020505@globaledgesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Nortel Networks Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:27:09 -0500 Message-Id: <1259792829.3845.31.camel@khone.us.nortel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2009 22:27:09.0982 (UTC) FILETIME=[9675F3E0:01CA739E] Cc: sip@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sip] 182 call queued X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:27:27 -0000 On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 10:44 +0530, Mahesh wrote: > Can any body tell me 182 call queued packet format. It is an ordinary SIP provisional response with response code 182. There is no special format. Dale From spencer@wonderhamster.org Tue Dec 8 14:25:52 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11293A6942; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:25:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.88 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.719, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BPWkTG8wEdhw; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:25:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49973A68D4; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:25:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from S73602b (cpe-76-182-230-135.tx.res.rr.com [76.182.230.135]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MV6gv-1Nb4Wa0drB-00YLLu; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:25:40 -0500 Message-ID: <2D674B58536A4E71975022512AF6A411@china.huawei.com> From: "Spencer Dawkins" To: "SIP IETF" , Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 16:25:29 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/HBMPvVK1k616cbou+x2MAfC7qCXYOiEOCvxN 1O+9vOUGbJm5n1C6o/vCPFQRFikPmvF0Am3lZnmE4pVc0cXjz1 LJ8WjfQ7PooRCgsL0Zc1jDbnJ6uzitRz7JNE2o802Y= Cc: techwg@sipforum.org Subject: [Sip] Fw: [martini] New Mailing List announcement - MARTINI (was - DREGS) X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:25:52 -0000 Just so everyone is on the same page, Cullen asked me to announce this mailing list on SIP, SIPPING, and the techwg mailing list... See you on MARTINI! Thanks, Spencer ----- Original Message ----- From: "Spencer Dawkins" To: ; Cc: Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:23 PM Subject: [martini] New Mailing List announcement - MARTINI (was - DREGS) > Cullen has asked me to announce a new mailing list, called MARTINI > (acronym > for "Multiple AoR reachabiliTy InformatioN Indication"), to be used for > discussion of what has variously been called "implicit registration", > "domain registration", and probably some other terms as well. > > To be a little more precise, the MARTINI mailing list was created to > discuss > means by which an entity that is authoritative for SIP URIs can > dynamically > register reachability information for multiple Addresses of Record > ("AORs") > with a service provider. > > The coordinates are in the place you'd expect: > > General Discussion: martini@ietf.org > To Subscribe: martini-request@ietf.org > In Body: subscribe > Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/index.html > > Just to catch people up... DISPATCH recommended that this proposed work go > forward in a mini-working group. The IESG approved a proposed charter to > be > sent for a two-week review on last Thursday's telechat, so you should see > that announcement popping out fairly quickly. > > That charter also proposes an interim meeting in January 2010, and we'll > be > discussing logistics on the MARTINI mailing list in the near future, so > please subscribe Real Soon Now if you are interested in the topic. > > Thanks! > > Spencer > _______________________________________________ > martini mailing list > martini@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini From nitinkapoorr@gmail.com Thu Dec 10 05:11:00 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C391E3A685D for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:11:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.317 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.317 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.281, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F5cT93WTT8Yo for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:11:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.27]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80C83A67DB for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so1429593qwb.17 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:10:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=cLzdBFa89F8jriyJS2tmywdM5grqcA8cGP8WJBYVnCo=; b=BLWVHKFSmQaH+P/GDUlt2xw5mVXRcdBPl+BI62y1zpI40wpjbSft+mq+0aB/82+/zL NzPQ4akf6h21g+JWye+wENnbCdY5MlhhvkfF7hk972e0S4MS3GvR+P6KAaZxvWcYLgka GCjlBQKs389mHoJ85lbo3/XtgkOuPfOAx3pVM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=W9ocZ8eYgCtGueOblZBWf65OTN4ZBDrPlDqonUDWAV2leR/nhiRtUr1SOO+h2yhlSh fd+F1HbhAtuhAUMnhBLzLyKWqEu2LMjYmiBOq9c8lVuMVc6AtFWc/bUoOHrSFS/hansI 8nOKRCtgrHHeWTO4HVh/Pw6pQDxONjbd24dK0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.69.93 with SMTP id y29mr2218895qci.53.1260450645707; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:10:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:10:45 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nitin Kapoor To: sip@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032557b162fe8d16047a5f8864 Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:11:00 -0000 --00032557b162fe8d16047a5f8864 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello All, I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two media streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone) I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well as the RTP traces too. As per the traces one RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and the other is coming from 8.15.244.11. Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two media streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if this is possible then what is the scenario where its possible. Please find the attached traces for the same. Thanks, Nitin Kapoor General Telecom --00032557b162fe8d16047a5f8864 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello All,

I am facing the issue with one of my custome= r where he is getting two media streams in one call and they are using SBC(= Nextone)

I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to= me as well as the RTP traces too.

As per the traces one=A0 RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and the= other is coming from 8.15.244.11.

Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two media streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if this is possible then what is the scenario where its possible.

Please find the attached traces for the same.

Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor
General Telecom
--00032557b162fe8d16047a5f8864-- From ron.even.tlv@gmail.com Thu Dec 10 05:36:15 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137163A68A5 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:36:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u2P8dkslt9cG for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:36:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBB33A68A9 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:36:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so8897598fxm.28 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:35:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=ZLIttahOkd6wW/6Pmo7IIvBfUpJPAstiLu/ZJ7ZEPZ8=; b=ZJF0HQNTPCxErLxSDRIMGf/eaTUakzrL7nSc+1gLhku7gdy37hmOH2GKzv1vuGhLQI b6vQev/Yul7QN5dpfcU4MoZrqqTxHmzh1xjIihtXZ5/r1mZpgB44efD2p0vlCJFOwvel Mu6k3X8AA+90yZm7ZaTE6l7b8ltZqUW+Zkzj0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; b=VwWJ9nGfuEOm4wnr6eK6iRsoWR83olpDf8yKLnupFEKrXwPiwv7Viwwv0fVuuiiM8S 9BTYYYhQmjUVMqHAjuHGeOU+CpMuoU6kHjPb6n8TY351hEIh/n61byvk3c33XfDt752C ow3YWDd0GJ3OUEDfGOFrbRBdpmK8fhfzUbaKE= Received: by 10.223.97.132 with SMTP id l4mr1990743fan.100.1260452144451; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:35:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from windows8d787f9 (bzq-79-176-46-225.red.bezeqint.net [79.176.46.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm323218fxm.12.2009.12.10.05.35.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:35:43 -0800 (PST) From: "Roni Even" To: "'Nitin Kapoor'" , References: In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:32:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4b20f92f.100db80a.418e.1f67@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004C_01CA79AE.06A07590" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-index: Acp5mj0S3otDG6A0Sf+mAXfgjQhVpQAAr8NA Content-language: en-us Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:36:15 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004C_01CA79AE.06A07590 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, To know the answer you need to provide the SDP in the offer and answer. If the offer/answer SDP defined two media streams, or N media streams this is probably OK. Roni Even From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nitin Kapoor Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:11 PM To: sip@ietf.org Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call Hello All, I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two media streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone) I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well as the RTP traces too. As per the traces one RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and the other is coming from 8.15.244.11. Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two media streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if this is possible then what is the scenario where its possible. Please find the attached traces for the same. Thanks, Nitin Kapoor General Telecom ------=_NextPart_000_004C_01CA79AE.06A07590 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

To know the answer you need to provide the SDP in the = offer and answer.

If the offer/answer SDP defined two media streams, or N = media streams this is probably OK.

Roni Even

 

From:= sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of = Nitin Kapoor
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:11 PM
To: sip@ietf.org
Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call

 

Hello All,


I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two = media streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone)

I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well = as the RTP traces too.

As per the traces one  RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and = the other is coming from 8.15.244.11.

Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two = media streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if = this is possible then what is the scenario where its possible.

Please find the attached traces for the same.

Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor
General Telecom

------=_NextPart_000_004C_01CA79AE.06A07590-- From christer.holmberg@ericsson.com Thu Dec 10 05:56:25 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1DF3A6972 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:56:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.235 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5fO7QhNbdjH9 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:56:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgw3.ericsson.se (mailgw3.ericsson.se [193.180.251.60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3793A694D for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:56:24 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb3c-b7b8dae0000047e9-d9-4b20fdfb59fb Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw3.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id EF.75.18409.BFDF02B4; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:56:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.4]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:56:10 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:53:34 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call Thread-Index: Acp5mjmgx4jZUJyoShGqR8zBd4PhQgABfCzP References: From: "Christer Holmberg" To: "Nitin Kapoor" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Dec 2009 13:56:10.0955 (UTC) FILETIME=[878FB1B0:01CA79A0] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:56:25 -0000 Hi, It is possible. In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP only = talks about where media is to be sent - not where it comes from. In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has its = own c- line, each with a different IP address. Regards, Christer -----Original Message----- From: sip-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Nitin Kapoor Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM To: sip@ietf.org Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call =20 Hello All, I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two = media streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone) I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well = as the RTP traces too. As per the traces one RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and the = other is coming from 8.15.244.11. Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two = media streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if = this is possible then what is the scenario where its possible. Please find the attached traces for the same. Thanks, Nitin Kapoor General Telecom From nitinkapoorr@gmail.com Thu Dec 10 07:47:13 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DF53A6AA5 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:47:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.913 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.913 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.085, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_17=0.6, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, URI_HEX=0.368, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UOY+s6Rd3JCA for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:47:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f188.google.com (mail-qy0-f188.google.com [209.85.221.188]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704A63A6A8A for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:47:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so3895993qyk.5 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:46:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0a741lbmD3MSOZ5GmQkGsgA9q9gcMRztpKtkpD7GIO0=; b=Z79mRhkYYlbNp9XNs9dPfXd4IpKcrwEKpU6/F2wDJHLpFMLNshNJBAkHiZeJXZZ5kY iTx7YumJ5Da5ZkQRuC8OVKua8jX7XlH/Siixy46P37pmwgPsWoWKp3Te9W4W4fntLg3k L/EaP93pv0AHgRLmeInKfQkSFMc4M6EPqy4iE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=GXFNX+oaG92565Bmh4Wp/rbD/yJNkBwJO4ztyuvYjMvQoxLmCb23g4976umoguetxK q/+WSxpUTPr/8il7cSsMbtFDN3O8xbZaUDPxEB7A3dS2pgjxFraYfu8q9Qi5Ojn7oRW+ o5IbJtLTjIieMK3T74kkh7HtYBy0OJsb4jUJM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.102.165 with SMTP id g37mr24976qco.65.1260460017230; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:46:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:46:56 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nitin Kapoor To: Christer Holmberg Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235447067494a47e047a61b7ad Cc: sip@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:47:13 -0000 --00235447067494a47e047a61b7ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Hello, > > Below is the packet in UDP format, Could you please help me on this to > understand this scenario. Also attached is the complete traces. > > INVITE sip:9996214018210532@208.85.248.42SIP/2.0 > > Max-Forwards: 69 > > Session-Expires: 3600;refresher=uac > > Supported: timer, 100rel > > To: > > > > From: ;tag=3468945569-250042 > > Call-ID: 7044988-3468945569-250036@mscasheq01.soundbite.com > > CSeq: 1 INVITE > > Allow: INVITE, BYE, OPTIONS, CANCEL, ACK, REGISTER, NOTIFY, INFO, REFER, > SUBSCRIBE, PRACK, UPDATE > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.15.244.10:5060 > ;branch=z9hG4bKf5de4d0e3c0860d122139e1e30a2995c > > Contact: > > Call-Info: > ;method="NOTIFY;Event=telephone-event;Duration=1000" > > Content-Type: application/sdp > > Content-Length: 124 > > > > v=0 > > o=mscasheq01 547500705 547500705 IN IP4 8.15.244.10 > > s=sip call > > c=IN IP4 8.15.244.11 > > t=0 0 > > m=audio 19612 RTP/AVP 0 > > SIP/2.0 100 Trying > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.15.244.10:5060 > ;branch=z9hG4bKf5de4d0e3c0860d122139e1e30a2995c > > From: ;tag=3468945569-250042 > > To: > > > > Call-ID: 7044988-3468945569-250036@mscasheq01.soundbite.com > > CSeq: 1 INVITE > > Server: Sansay VSX 2.1 > > Content-Length: 0 > > > > SIP/2.0 180 Ringing > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.15.244.10:5060 > ;branch=z9hG4bKf5de4d0e3c0860d122139e1e30a2995c > > From: ;tag=3468945569-250042 > > To: > >;tag=228209687-tdb1145808424 > > Call-ID: 7044988-3468945569-250036@mscasheq01.soundbite.com > > CSeq: 1 INVITE > > Server: Sansay VSX 2.1 > > Content-Length: 0 > > > > SIP/2.0 200 OK > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.15.244.10:5060 > ;branch=z9hG4bKf5de4d0e3c0860d122139e1e30a2995c > > From: ;tag=3468945569-250042 > > To: > >;tag=228209687-tdb1145808424 > > Call-ID: 7044988-3468945569-250036@mscasheq01.soundbite.com > > CSeq: 1 INVITE > > Server: Sansay VSX 2.1 > > Contact: > > Content-Type: application/sdp > > Content-Length: 158 > > > > v=0 > > o=sansay-VSX 10 10 IN IP4 64.156.174.71 > > s=session controller > > c=IN IP4 64.156.174.71 > > t=0 0 > > m=audio 10766 RTP/AVP 0 > > a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 > > a=ptime:20 > > ACK sip:9996214018210532@208.85.248.42:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0 > > Max-Forwards: 69 > > To: > >;tag=228209687-tdb1145808424 > > From: ;tag=3468945569-250042 > > Call-ID: 7044988-3468945569-250036@mscasheq01.soundbite.com > > CSeq: 1 ACK > > Allow: INVITE, BYE, OPTIONS, CANCEL, ACK, REGISTER, NOTIFY, INFO, REFER, > SUBSCRIBE, PRACK, UPDATE > > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.15.244.10:5060 > ;branch=z9hG4bK7208e1bfdd2962741dc3dee9d2576820 > > Contact: > > Content-Length: 0 > > > Thanks, > Nitin Kapoor > > 2009/12/10 Christer Holmberg > > >> Hi, >> >> It is possible. >> >> In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP only talks >> about where media is to be sent - not where it comes from. >> >> In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has its >> own c- line, each with a different IP address. >> >> Regards, >> >> Christer >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: sip-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Nitin Kapoor >> Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM >> To: sip@ietf.org >> Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call >> >> Hello All, >> >> I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two >> media >> streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone) >> >> I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well as >> the RTP traces too. >> >> As per the traces one RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and the >> other >> is coming from 8.15.244.11. >> >> Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two media >> streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if this >> is >> possible then what is the scenario where its possible. >> >> Please find the attached traces for the same. >> >> Thanks, >> Nitin Kapoor >> General Telecom >> >> > --00235447067494a47e047a61b7ad Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

Below is the packet in UDP format, Could you pl= ease help me on this to understand this scenario. Also attached is the comp= lete traces.

INVITE sip:9996214018210532@208.85.248.42 SIP/2.0

Max-Forwards: 69

Session-Expires: 3600;refresher=3Duac

Su= pported: timer, 100rel

To: <sip:9996214018210532@208.85.248.42= >

From: <sip:8003223223@tmsash1-15-sip>;tag=3D3468945569-250042

Call-ID: 7044988-3468945569-250036@mscasheq01.soundbite.co= m

CSeq: 1 INVITE

Allow: INVITE, BYE, OPTIONS, CANCEL, ACK= , REGISTER, NOTIFY, INFO, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, PRACK, UPDATE

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.15.244.10:5060;branch=3Dz9hG4bKf5de4d0e3c0860d122139= e1e30a2995c

Contact: <sip:8003223223@8.15.244.10:5060>

Ca= ll-Info: <sip:8.15.244.10>;method=3D"NOTIFY;Event=3Dtelephone-ev= ent;Duration=3D1000"

Content-Type: application/sdp

Content-Length: 124


v=3D0

o=3Dmscasheq01 547500705 547500705 IN IP4 8.15.244.10

= s=3Dsip call

c=3DIN IP4 8.15.244.11

t=3D0 0

m=3Daudio = 19612 RTP/AVP 0

SIP/2.0 100 Trying

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.15.244.10:5060;branch=3Dz9= hG4bKf5de4d0e3c0860d122139e1e30a2995c

From: <sip:8003223223@tmsas= h1-15-sip>;tag=3D3468945569-250042

To: <sip:9996214018210532@20= 8.85.248.42>

Call-ID: 7044988-3468945569-250036@mscasheq01.soundbite.co= m

CSeq: 1 INVITE

Server: Sansay VSX 2.1

Content-Le= ngth: 0



SIP/2.0 180 Ringing

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.15.244.10:5060;branch=3Dz= 9hG4bKf5de4d0e3c0860d122139e1e30a2995c

From: <sip:8003223223@tmsa= sh1-15-sip>;tag=3D3468945569-250042

To: <sip:9996214018210532@2= 08.85.248.42>;tag=3D228209687-tdb1145808424

Call-ID: 7044988-3468945569-250036@mscasheq01.soundbite.co= m

CSeq: 1 INVITE

Server: Sansay VSX 2.1

Content-Le= ngth: 0



SIP/2.0 200 OK

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.15.244.10:5060;branch=3Dz9hG4b= Kf5de4d0e3c0860d122139e1e30a2995c

From: <sip:8003223223@tmsash1-1= 5-sip>;tag=3D3468945569-250042

To: <sip:9996214018210532@208.85= .248.42>;tag=3D228209687-tdb1145808424

Call-ID: 7044988-3468945569-250036@mscasheq01.soundbite.co= m

CSeq: 1 INVITE

Server: Sansay VSX 2.1

Contact: &= lt;sip:9996214018210532@208.85.248.42:5060;transport=3Dudp>

Content-Type: application/sdp

Content-Length:=A0=A0 158

<= br>
v=3D0

o=3Dsansay-VSX 10 10 IN IP4 64.156.174.71

s=3Dse= ssion controller

c=3DIN IP4 64.156.174.71

t=3D0 0

m=3D= audio 10766 RTP/AVP 0

a=3Drtpmap:0 PCMU/8000

a=3Dptime:20

ACK sip:9996214018210= 532@208.85.248.42:5060;transport=3Dudp SIP/2.0

Max-Forwards: 69
<= br>To: <sip:9996214018210532@208.85.248.42>;tag=3D228209687-tdb1= 145808424

From: <sip:8003223223@tmsash1-15-sip>;tag=3D3468945569-250042
=
Call-ID: 7044988-3468945569-250036@mscasheq01.soundbite.co= m

CSeq: 1 ACK

Allow: INVITE, BYE, OPTIONS, CANCEL, ACK, REGISTER, NOTIFY, INFO, REFER= , SUBSCRIBE, PRACK, UPDATE

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.15.244.10:5060;branch= =3Dz9hG4bK7208e1bfdd2962741dc3dee9d2576820

Contact: <sip:8003223223@8.1= 5.244.10:5060>

Content-Length: 0


Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor

2009/12/10 Christer Holmberg <christer.holmb= erg@ericsson.com>


Hi,

It is possible.

In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP only talks = about where media is to be sent - not where it comes from.

In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has its own= c- line, each with a different IP address.

Regards,

Christer


-----Original Message-----
From: sip-bounces= @ietf.org on behalf of Nitin Kapoor
Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM
To: sip@ietf.org
Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call

Hello All,

I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two media=
streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone)

I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well as the RTP traces too.

As per the traces one =A0RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and the oth= er
is coming from 8.15.244.11.

Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two media<= br> streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if this i= s
possible then what is the scenario where its possible.

Please find the attached traces for the same.

Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor
General Telecom



--00235447067494a47e047a61b7ad-- From ron.even.tlv@gmail.com Thu Dec 10 10:00:57 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E883B3A6A12 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:00:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SVSE++uYuM5U for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:00:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f223.google.com (mail-bw0-f223.google.com [209.85.218.223]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2E03A6890 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:00:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so32511bwz.29 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:00:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=VnPK3lXBLk4oFgcHiNnUfsTOAV7cxU5ljV5DZlrgIhg=; b=bTfKEzEnPHqYvTN6V7jb0RB4XlQR3LZvj6Mkg6b+Xu3rLSeGiyuZlbCO+iidGzqQ5H mK324sVIPHhbC9AZ5QPIuI53cPROyRdtQlPfSo/0HStsbGpJGw3nC7vRwAqNdW9mvQ0q nPieFHueaMn4d9gslzNvAIZV6RgmuMmyandjk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; b=g/WaKKi/GVhXRbzjuSlREuSrUwM/x2GtukrC/MMR8zVsOdVy5uMtXYchTqhgr3jPik zf9oU5tZrXat2Y6QA5cqsnTcEuJlTeqjuxpmMzZ5TNTmnnVsRRSDjhWjElpMW78cpDm8 hWEHWttGLXF0WHNWeEkIsKkzM6AIh7WtVMwTA= Received: by 10.102.214.22 with SMTP id m22mr90094mug.54.1260468037995; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:00:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from windows8d787f9 (bzq-79-176-46-225.red.bezeqint.net [79.176.46.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y6sm2848358mug.31.2009.12.10.10.00.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:00:36 -0800 (PST) From: "Roni Even" To: "'Christer Holmberg'" , "'Nitin Kapoor'" , References: In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:57:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4b213744.06e2660a.5909.37ce@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-index: Acp5mjmgx4jZUJyoShGqR8zBd4PhQgABfCzPAAhxQgA= Content-language: en-us Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:00:57 -0000 Hi, I looked at the SDP you send, you are seeing two RTP streams, one for each direction. Since both sides talk than you see one RTP steam from 8.15.244.11 in one direction to port 10766 and one from 64.156.174.71 going to the other direction to port 19612 Roni Even > -----Original Message----- > From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Christer Holmberg > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:54 PM > To: Nitin Kapoor; sip@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > > Hi, > > It is possible. > > In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP only > talks about where media is to be sent - not where it comes from. > > In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has its > own c- line, each with a different IP address. > > Regards, > > Christer > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sip-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Nitin Kapoor > Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM > To: sip@ietf.org > Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > Hello All, > > I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two > media > streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone) > > I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well > as > the RTP traces too. > > As per the traces one RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and the > other > is coming from 8.15.244.11. > > Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two > media > streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if > this is > possible then what is the scenario where its possible. > > Please find the attached traces for the same. > > Thanks, > Nitin Kapoor > General Telecom > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip From nitinkapoorr@gmail.com Thu Dec 10 10:03:23 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F0B3A6B41 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:03:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.458 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.458 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F4YnFytOA1D9 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:03:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5254B3A6B0B for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:03:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so18507qwb.17 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:03:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hAJ1wgvNbMqn/h1IlL+CzefBR2IemTgg3e5C6T1WuCI=; b=GKG3oII3qeuKhuNt3PoKFON4AZnsT11hJT4pHx0JP1JnWNLx86L08xEJL8ButDgiye QGQJyXfBB1/rrSurUyIXm3NE6pRH1B1fjfhoRMckk3UNpSDSJ5W05xOXMzu00CCYR8Jg 3aWgNx6v45dQB0JU+8KWEP0Tca6KmTMLfJwEI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=gvHAFIth/6gVQD0vrkZw8y5ZFJy1O7XzRvPNN7nYwWpMV4C1BZufxkyXVv32x3meTh z2V4wSKwaHOOi1cm86kZzgF+X+DqZsw05wg9boRUzYpeXfqooCT7cSngXTBpg62nJcco UbMrmnEXVyPj+MPjnYcEqs9c5GhvdjaVIMNjk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.33.70 with SMTP id g6mr128549qcd.75.1260468188311; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:03:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4b213744.06e2660a.5909.37ce@mx.google.com> References: <4b213744.06e2660a.5909.37ce@mx.google.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:03:07 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nitin Kapoor To: Roni Even Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368342589d700c047a639ece Cc: sip@ietf.org, Christer Holmberg Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:03:23 -0000 --0016368342589d700c047a639ece Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Roni, So is that the normal call.. I mean is it possible or you have seen any issue into it.. Please help me on this. Thanks, Nitin Kapoor 2009/12/10 Roni Even > Hi, > I looked at the SDP you send, you are seeing two RTP streams, one for each > direction. Since both sides talk than you see one RTP steam from > 8.15.244.11 > in one direction to port 10766 and one from 64.156.174.71 going to the > other > direction to port 19612 > > Roni Even > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > > Christer Holmberg > > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:54 PM > > To: Nitin Kapoor; sip@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > > > > > Hi, > > > > It is possible. > > > > In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP only > > talks about where media is to be sent - not where it comes from. > > > > In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has its > > own c- line, each with a different IP address. > > > > Regards, > > > > Christer > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sip-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Nitin Kapoor > > Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM > > To: sip@ietf.org > > Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > > > Hello All, > > > > I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two > > media > > streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone) > > > > I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well > > as > > the RTP traces too. > > > > As per the traces one RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and the > > other > > is coming from 8.15.244.11. > > > > Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two > > media > > streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if > > this is > > possible then what is the scenario where its possible. > > > > Please find the attached traces for the same. > > > > Thanks, > > Nitin Kapoor > > General Telecom > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > > Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > > Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip > > --0016368342589d700c047a639ece Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roni,

So is that the normal call.. I mean is it possible or you have= seen any issue into it..

Please help me on this.

Thanks,
= Nitin Kapoor

2009/12/10 Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail= .com>
Hi,
I looked at the SDP you send, you are seeing two RTP streams, one for each<= br> direction. Since both sides talk than you see one RTP steam from 8.15.244.1= 1
in one direction to port 10766 and one from 64.156.174.71 going to the othe= r
direction to port 19612

Roni Even

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces@ietf.org= [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] = On Behalf Of
> Christer Holmberg
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:54 PM
> To: Nitin Kapoor; sip@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It is possible.
>
> In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP only > talks about where media is to be sent - not where it comes from.
>
> In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has it= s
> own c- line, each with a different IP address.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces@ietf.org= on behalf of Nitin Kapoor
> Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM
> To: sip@ietf.org
> Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call
>
> Hello All,
>
> I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two<= br> > media
> streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone)
>
> I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well=
> as
> the RTP traces too.
>
> As per the traces one =A0RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and th= e
> other
> is coming from 8.15.244.11.
>
> Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two > media
> streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if > this is
> possible then what is the scenario where its possible.
>
> Please find the attached traces for the same.
>
> Thanks,
> Nitin Kapoor
> General Telecom
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list =A0https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implemento= rs@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping@ietf.org for new d= evelopments on the application of sip


--0016368342589d700c047a639ece-- From ron.even.tlv@gmail.com Thu Dec 10 10:36:33 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52353A6816 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:36:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f9OVVCPaaPMv for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com (mail-fx0-f213.google.com [209.85.220.213]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178113A6801 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:36:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so192957fxm.28 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:36:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=ZJN5FJm7OTwCVcdS7gf2Fd8LdBAIGRwUS0LEutShNDQ=; b=SF3WjC1uvdt2sJRgDPXjxNre4HcDRn/L5/Ha810AdBz4NsODWp14R4L/vkJ3KwjQ0y a7wiS17uyPoACuSVFGUrd9aj0Ooao17vuO0N1avCX0pqB1Ny8mWuxQcwdD9cVCIn6nyo YggwJYUeVmVRPbj1zyiToRQ5cY5UiRWtZIxIs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; b=QPxRCTfiPwx3+D3Y5PY/cEha7JLzZKBMcuGqoQadmhQDS7W7dAxeny7jUJ74Hr7fkc Qiqo74fVTNe5hDtOzbfgrhDEyIsm8vSMTTQt1euyYKkgBt5ANI/aA8fuY6hzlsAkeb1Z uI7QBlwSIcViGoU4cfBYFhkko3ffaL+jmuEkc= Received: by 10.223.5.18 with SMTP id 18mr302043fat.58.1260470177488; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:36:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from windows8d787f9 (bzq-79-176-46-225.red.bezeqint.net [79.176.46.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm430394fxm.6.2009.12.10.10.36.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:36:14 -0800 (PST) From: "Roni Even" To: "'Nitin Kapoor'" References: <4b213744.06e2660a.5909.37ce@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:33:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4b213f9e.0f0db80a.58b0.2ebc@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0081_01CA79D7.FF2A4410" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-index: Acp5wwc1kgiyJhNPQWKrpKSmdphFGwAA/2Pw Content-language: en-us Cc: sip@ietf.org, 'Christer Holmberg' Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:36:33 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0081_01CA79D7.FF2A4410 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This is a normal call, RTP is unidirectional and this is why you see two RTP streams one from each side for each media channel. Roni From: Nitin Kapoor [mailto:nitinkapoorr@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:03 PM To: Roni Even Cc: Christer Holmberg; sip@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call Roni, So is that the normal call.. I mean is it possible or you have seen any issue into it.. Please help me on this. Thanks, Nitin Kapoor 2009/12/10 Roni Even Hi, I looked at the SDP you send, you are seeing two RTP streams, one for each direction. Since both sides talk than you see one RTP steam from 8.15.244.11 in one direction to port 10766 and one from 64.156.174.71 going to the other direction to port 19612 Roni Even > -----Original Message----- > From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Christer Holmberg > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:54 PM > To: Nitin Kapoor; sip@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > > Hi, > > It is possible. > > In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP only > talks about where media is to be sent - not where it comes from. > > In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has its > own c- line, each with a different IP address. > > Regards, > > Christer > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sip-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Nitin Kapoor > Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM > To: sip@ietf.org > Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > Hello All, > > I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two > media > streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone) > > I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well > as > the RTP traces too. > > As per the traces one RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and the > other > is coming from 8.15.244.11. > > Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two > media > streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if > this is > possible then what is the scenario where its possible. > > Please find the attached traces for the same. > > Thanks, > Nitin Kapoor > General Telecom > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip ------=_NextPart_000_0081_01CA79D7.FF2A4410 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This is a normal call, RTP is unidirectional and this is = why you see two RTP streams one from each side for each media = channel.

Roni

 

From:= Nitin = Kapoor [mailto:nitinkapoorr@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:03 PM
To: Roni Even
Cc: Christer Holmberg; sip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One = call

 

Roni,

So is that the normal call.. I mean is it possible or you have seen any = issue into it..

Please help me on this.

Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor

2009/12/10 Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>

Hi,
I looked at the SDP you send, you are seeing two RTP streams, one for = each
direction. Since both sides talk than you see one RTP steam from = 8.15.244.11
in one direction to port 10766 and one from 64.156.174.71 going to the = other
direction to port 19612

Roni Even


> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of

> Christer Holmberg
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:54 PM
> To: Nitin Kapoor; sip@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It is possible.
>
> In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP = only
> talks about where media is to be sent - not where it comes = from.
>
> In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has = its
> own c- line, each with a different IP address.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Nitin Kapoor
> Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM
> To: sip@ietf.org
> Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call
>
> Hello All,
>
> I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting = two
> media
> streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone)
>
> I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as = well
> as
> the RTP traces too.
>
> As per the traces one  RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 = and the
> other
> is coming from 8.15.244.11.
>
> Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the = two
> media
> streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And = if
> this is
> possible then what is the scenario where its possible.
>
> Please find the attached traces for the same.
>
> Thanks,
> Nitin Kapoor
> General Telecom
>

> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors@cs.colu= mbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping@ietf.org for = new developments on the application of sip

 

------=_NextPart_000_0081_01CA79D7.FF2A4410-- From nitinkapoorr@gmail.com Wed Dec 16 14:12:42 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1473A69FB for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:12:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.504 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Glx8P8-dp305 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:12:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808EC3A6A5F for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:12:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so311323qwb.31 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:12:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sKJoWv4K6RpUJyiJqLNAQKFRE7+8VlOvhv4y3l/dlyE=; b=azhpx2FEkRQYi88Tg3CxLRnwQvbc/Hi5/tBsI6UUY6RO3JRXLF9d7h3uvEklo3beiI Y7Tr2J9+0AuUc3pC2iEK910g3IVDJh9+yFBM3l9uVmplNfPzeqN4ebSR0hDgRLFS364D 2XrT2bKM3kcQ6MZ2c9+Li/jPeVohe3MkZZAPE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=giNmbKOzjN42NXx64qVh28z1j3X0WCUzRkAr5vcvFR6hPfzIoeJcm2JrQtNjn9XG3j o9LyA1/ap7s6yFfap9sxOuxT5iJyAOR8VIf8/FJMV5lhv6CilE2FQonYxrn+HLCRNqmo 5f9nFRdC+7eaUByUS0lmRSTiVqIOXtX4Ufe6Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.23.83 with SMTP id q19mr961466qcb.37.1261001543148; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:12:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4b213f9e.0f0db80a.58b0.2ebc@mx.google.com> References: <4b213744.06e2660a.5909.37ce@mx.google.com> <4b213f9e.0f0db80a.58b0.2ebc@mx.google.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:12:23 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nitin Kapoor To: Roni Even Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163641704b0a63e7047adfcdcd Cc: sip@ietf.org, Christer Holmberg Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:12:42 -0000 --00163641704b0a63e7047adfcdcd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello Roni, I still have the doubt.. the point you have mentioned that the the RTP is the unidirectional and because of that it is showing me two RTP streams. But if we are decoding the RTP packets and whenever i am trying to hear the messages then i can see that both have the different conversion..which is confusing me lot... because without CONFERENCE call how one call have two different conversion or RTP stream in one dialog... Please correct me if i am wrong. Thanks, Nitin Kapoor 2009/12/10 Roni Even > This is a normal call, RTP is unidirectional and this is why you see two > RTP streams one from each side for each media channel. > > Roni > > > > *From:* Nitin Kapoor [mailto:nitinkapoorr@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:03 PM > *To:* Roni Even > *Cc:* Christer Holmberg; sip@ietf.org > > *Subject:* Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > > > Roni, > > So is that the normal call.. I mean is it possible or you have seen any > issue into it.. > > Please help me on this. > > Thanks, > Nitin Kapoor > > 2009/12/10 Roni Even > > Hi, > I looked at the SDP you send, you are seeing two RTP streams, one for each > direction. Since both sides talk than you see one RTP steam from > 8.15.244.11 > in one direction to port 10766 and one from 64.156.174.71 going to the > other > direction to port 19612 > > Roni Even > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > > > Christer Holmberg > > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:54 PM > > To: Nitin Kapoor; sip@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > > > > > Hi, > > > > It is possible. > > > > In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP only > > talks about where media is to be sent - not where it comes from. > > > > In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has its > > own c- line, each with a different IP address. > > > > Regards, > > > > Christer > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sip-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Nitin Kapoor > > Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM > > To: sip@ietf.org > > Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > > > Hello All, > > > > I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two > > media > > streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone) > > > > I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well > > as > > the RTP traces too. > > > > As per the traces one RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and the > > other > > is coming from 8.15.244.11. > > > > Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two > > media > > streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if > > this is > > possible then what is the scenario where its possible. > > > > Please find the attached traces for the same. > > > > Thanks, > > Nitin Kapoor > > General Telecom > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > > Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > > Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip > > > --00163641704b0a63e7047adfcdcd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Roni,

I still have the doubt.. the point you have mentioned th= at the the RTP is the unidirectional and because of that it is showing me t= wo RTP streams.

But if we are decoding the RTP packets and whenever= i am trying to hear the messages then i can see that both have the differe= nt conversion..which is confusing me lot... because without CONFERENCE call= how one call have two different conversion or RTP stream=A0 in one dialog.= ..

Please correct me if i am wrong.

Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor

=
2009/12/10 Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com><= br>

This is a normal call, RTP is unidirectional and this is why you see two RTP streams one from each side for each media channel.

Roni

=A0

From:= Nitin Kapoor [mailto:nitinka= poorr@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:03 PM
To: Roni Even
Cc: Christer Holmberg; sip@ietf.org


Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call

=A0

Roni,

So is that the normal call.. I mean is it possible or you have seen any iss= ue into it..

Please help me on this.

Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor

2009/12/10 Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>

Hi,
I looked at the SDP you send, you are seeing two RTP streams, one for each<= br> direction. Since both sides talk than you see one RTP steam from 8.15.244.1= 1
in one direction to port 10766 and one from 64.156.174.71 going to the othe= r
direction to port 19612

Roni Even


> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bo= unces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounc= es@ietf.org] On Behalf Of

> Christer Holmberg
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:54 PM
> To: Nitin Kapoor; si= p@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It is possible.
>
> In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP only > talks about where media is to be sent - not where it comes from.
>
> In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has it= s
> own c- line, each with a different IP address.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bo= unces@ietf.org on behalf of Nitin Kapoor
> Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM
> To: sip@ietf.org=
> Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call
>
> Hello All,
>
> I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two<= br> > media
> streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone)
>
> I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well=
> as
> the RTP traces too.
>
> As per the traces one =A0RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and th= e
> other
> is coming from 8.15.244.11.
>
> Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two > media
> streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if > this is
> possible then what is the scenario where its possible.
>
> Please find the attached traces for the same.
>
> Thanks,
> Nitin Kapoor
> General Telecom
>

> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list =A0https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping@ietf= .org for new developments on the application of sip

=A0


--00163641704b0a63e7047adfcdcd-- From shivalk_80@yahoo.co.in Wed Dec 16 22:35:24 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A473A6AA1 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:35:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.495 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RELAY_IS_203=0.994] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3QjLoDTeiGH6 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:35:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from web94801.mail.in2.yahoo.com (web94801.mail.in2.yahoo.com [203.104.17.135]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B6C93A6A62 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:35:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 21824 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Dec 2009 06:35:03 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.in; s=s1024; t=1261031703; bh=adof0ZfCrik/k8WrjAi7iAI5nx8WgUn3XxHz7lmE9F0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3dPN6s+EfqKXA/xpR/An17mauzSJ7F5M0lk0qtzQUsr8Xc50EwAos3cJWUEYe2/ZO6VJ9871yrSLrSDAoecjZZ55JrWf7GFaebOKWfCk5Wp22EGswm2bpMPzWsDUHBWQ6Odu94zY6i6UM2Z1sh1my3SvPZIQ0xg9Nk+O2CR3FDw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.in; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=V4+O2CRbsm4iKvXilZQw46/2mwH6bGGdWLxk36cI+/OUNQ1f/AeqgYGUJUtjZGQnv+a/gTq5CcZd6G9m6dhf/pTV3IEMcLu2MVHpxxjWB/7mBrLQYuIBwW8J5iJojfDySu/k6jEkZ1bYHvxD7JtpAyLhxM3XCe+sPwe+rnk0Imw=; Message-ID: <633819.21045.qm@web94801.mail.in2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: iE7IvE0VM1mcnFl9e35Bg8LpNs54UJIWMPPyuFmZqqQV6O4fvhwrfixcRE9MGtLob9OwZEMli4NPiw8Jr7sgyqQIqQ_VIyEqmJK6S0LszrzV6EDvYnICEnv8zfl4nMU8HTtMcjKkdssbQM0U9A2jk_K1hIdHYSfPykBBfXPUs88MweiWDeVI.WzAz95m446kdiS..1pl3pDxRkqABQJD1S8ryFL4QeUlVAPuuKx4DW7emuohlYGekjAmRnk1gnFFxc6EvRht1VB4OH_aVEsOEsPEbJlDuNg100Xr0UGej_P0eF6zNeUtfGpUxxCj7134gMwgv54- Received: from [203.84.220.46] by web94801.mail.in2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:05:03 IST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.0.19 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:05:03 +0530 (IST) From: atul garg To: sip@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1088832150-1261031703=:21045" Subject: [Sip] SIP over SCTP X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:35:24 -0000 --0-1088832150-1261031703=:21045 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, Can I ahve some frame of SIP which is coming over SCTP ? Or some pointer fr= om where I can have it?/ Regards Atul =0A=0A=0A The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! H= omepage. http://in.yahoo.com/ --0-1088832150-1261031703=:21045 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All,

Can I ahve some frame of SIP w= hich is coming over SCTP ? Or some pointer from where I can have it?/
Regards
Atul

=0A=0A=0A=0A
=0AThe INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! Se= e your Yahoo! Homepage. --0-1088832150-1261031703=:21045-- From tfroment@yahoo.com Thu Dec 17 00:10:56 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EE93A6B2E for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:10:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eygJk2hIYd+8 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:10:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from web56802.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web56802.mail.re3.yahoo.com [66.196.97.76]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 92B823A67B0 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:10:55 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 97294 invoked by uid 60001); 17 Dec 2009 08:10:37 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1261037437; bh=MQ9csmhP9M3Rl3CPp3LqqJpdfQyMVbJU8OBItBP33/w=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pKbFs9Dvc0NuC3RCgggkn8WSTHuTzaaLI4knAAgWLYB8S+j7YkZcH2jCSQqfDnb6nrOswOMEkNqMOIm2Mlv04GHSyHxFdzAMbLvt0gKSASVhPVAw6YnAIwKM4+ybV0zsva0cNclqHg3H6XT1KFB7wwqX499SEvKw+5s2quFNZ7o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CzAvI2Yzgr6pKrebRYnisxA31P99+jQYmBz2/QtrvGopu1aNXFx85STcqC+nM2yuNJp1qG710kRS004J9NbHaifLaQ2NhsUIRi3hI8Zd7r3tdvg5U7hmDbuAzqKx9EoQ9D9oiuI6Iq/VH2n9J20DgaH5u669/6Wb0WXkTo3rhPw=; Message-ID: <724871.95800.qm@web56802.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: pw33grsVM1movlm42a.LPSohnRtpSo2V_ITVaVtzXjyqwh_Aba.KoIOUCUdo87cmwjsClIFyT.iKi8AWohvizPDaOqu9ym7.Ws604GRiXG9i4hdqcg8a.BaOiufQTB9iWKOtZ5EU5a_fGy8XP5er_60gJUSgWocUokCWpCjs2sNppPS0nhml0F6ksn84mfJ5QodFlstPAB1jK912u9s2pgdGUR8qw14p4yNf2u6zxZqk.oWmnkb9ZDb0.Qrrn2dyg3yAhc4EK_OOuIPa1YTRZww9XcYBdXfut3lHOPD2Cxh7.OGEa_VnSnN96ZYKowtruBE7ldsHusUDWJfuuuJr_SDBAuDuxnteiFp4J8QpCEAPHi3V7ZFrBwzpyeyIO2egWjN3xjnom9eU8xwgS.wJJLjXm45SKKlrCvq9j0VPRfkzOOiAsMtP1FmOSo7DJE9M9r9iK1Qwg_RfuST595WDImmY5JkVT38wMgh5EdlBCR.2I9kEwtyySF._5J_s.ItIk0_wwvWEAxk- Received: from [87.248.121.165] by web56802.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:10:37 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:10:37 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Froment To: atul garg MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-53107988-1261037437=:95800" Cc: "sip@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Sip] SIP over SCTP X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:10:56 -0000 --0-53107988-1261037437=:95800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, you have http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4168=0ABrds=0A=0AThomas=0A=0ALe = 17 d=E9c. 2009 =E0 07:35, atul garg a =E9crit :=0A= =0AHi All,=0A=0ACan I ahve some frame of SIP which is coming over SCTP ? Or= some pointer from where I can have it?/=0A=0ARegards=0AAtul=0A=0AThe INTER= NET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage.=0A_____________= __________________________________=0ASip mailing list https://www.ietf.org= /mailman/listinfo/sip=0AThis list is for NEW development of the core SIP Pr= otocol=0AUse sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip= =0AUse sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip=0A= =0A=0A=0A --0-53107988-1261037437=:95800 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Brds

Thomas

Le 17 d=E9c. 2009 =E0 07:35, atul garg <shivalk_80@yahoo.co.in> a =E9crit :

=
Hi All,

Can I ahve some frame of SIP which is coming over S= CTP ? Or some pointer from where I can have it?/

Regards
Atul
=

=0A=0A=0A=0A
=0A= The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Ho= mepage.
________= _______________________________________
Sip mailing list &n= bsp;https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/= sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SI= P Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org= for new developments on the application of sip
=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A --0-53107988-1261037437=:95800-- From victor.pascual.avila@gmail.com Thu Dec 17 06:30:40 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C40A28C12E for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:30:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.549 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lZsVQLQ+1drB for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:30:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f223.google.com (mail-bw0-f223.google.com [209.85.218.223]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E81028C131 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:30:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so1562228bwz.29 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:30:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+vfFEyUHieXanxyfemAZH6fWkZg0llmPpjVITfYNi3A=; b=po7uu6Lf1T4+wuvkcq0GaIXJv43MI7YUerB8PkKJ5J453wYIh38yLvE/PDB0DBs6zS aEGI6xl4Zvxk2uOZb1RKuWkzu1jz5nnGAcgGpF3StcvFXlL+keARTgWCWBGWWfLwZjId 7UTamgHccWvmrWCa4XiBESW0Pm+fbmsvsWwlk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bkZgy1/1TxG5P1jsV53fWWVLU0eP25M5v4L90XyMd9CgxLKxA+HvtDEN/D+b3cyKN1 WEgLIZL6cyodVBTmFX4USoGrNdzTlfDKJQUrn2pL3pAgR46khcA4WyR0vU2Jrh61oEsI Xxw6EV7sVxB7yC3DzdoogbOjdckzHZrixdVyw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.154.68 with SMTP id n4mr1469483bkw.54.1261060221474; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:30:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <633819.21045.qm@web94801.mail.in2.yahoo.com> References: <633819.21045.qm@web94801.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:30:21 +0100 Message-ID: <618e24240912170630s69901e38n1f6681cf944cb8e@mail.gmail.com> From: Victor Pascual Avila To: atul garg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: sip@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sip] SIP over SCTP X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:30:40 -0000 On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:35 AM, atul garg wrote: > > Hi All, > > Can I ahve some frame of SIP which is coming over SCTP ? Or some pointer = from where I can have it?/ Yes, basically be ready to receive over any stream, send over stream zero and use unordered delivery. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4168 Cheers, -- Victor Pascual =C3=81vila From nitinkapoorr@gmail.com Fri Dec 18 13:55:53 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621EC3A690E for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:55:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.756 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.756 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.842, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TOvpnnWt+xF5 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:55:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f203.google.com (mail-qy0-f203.google.com [209.85.221.203]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB3C3A68C2 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:55:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by qyk41 with SMTP id 41so1720445qyk.29 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:55:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=E3riNvrj2DrS3y8FCkkbNwORjqFlPeBXGBh3HwV20gw=; b=N1Fcc2cbViewQPOIUJgjwVbAAJdaNAo4M4ZMJ6W7cxxKcuKo1WM86TJQtdnUUyWp2F UPKtXEFSASB/Mpu8i7hJSWO6OwCXFvh1foKwzBz+FXCYGso03i86MQJ1hbtE3QE4xZbC T1CB52cQbURYZcw6TbzYxrr0QOgvQ9HU3sIdk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=iy49gH4rUbZJNWQ0nVC0Tn5wwqTBVpuZ0jPk+1hRG8xsn/ILIlqI8ibR5lFV15AJB/ OEFvTqz9BWCGV53lYqjjOvSoPgYjEWas7/xUp8sQGxIlahrUmtFZurFIiZMQmEqM33HS HKWNR6G37ENc3wjTzmn9L+TLHSGzjtmhfobnU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.59.226 with SMTP id m34mr2249825qch.101.1261173332074; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:55:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4b213744.06e2660a.5909.37ce@mx.google.com> <4b213f9e.0f0db80a.58b0.2ebc@mx.google.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:55:32 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nitin Kapoor To: sip@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023545be1b4756261047b07cc81 Cc: Christer Holmberg Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:55:53 -0000 --0023545be1b4756261047b07cc81 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, Can anyone help me out please on this. Thanks, Nitin Kapoor 2009/12/16 Nitin Kapoor > Hello Roni, > > I still have the doubt.. the point you have mentioned that the the RTP is > the unidirectional and because of that it is showing me two RTP streams. > > But if we are decoding the RTP packets and whenever i am trying to hear the > messages then i can see that both have the different conversion..which is > confusing me lot... because without CONFERENCE call how one call have two > different conversion or RTP stream in one dialog... > > Please correct me if i am wrong. > > > Thanks, > Nitin Kapoor > > 2009/12/10 Roni Even > >> This is a normal call, RTP is unidirectional and this is why you see two >> RTP streams one from each side for each media channel. >> >> Roni >> >> >> >> *From:* Nitin Kapoor [mailto:nitinkapoorr@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:03 PM >> *To:* Roni Even >> *Cc:* Christer Holmberg; sip@ietf.org >> >> *Subject:* Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call >> >> >> >> Roni, >> >> So is that the normal call.. I mean is it possible or you have seen any >> issue into it.. >> >> Please help me on this. >> >> Thanks, >> Nitin Kapoor >> >> 2009/12/10 Roni Even >> >> Hi, >> I looked at the SDP you send, you are seeing two RTP streams, one for each >> direction. Since both sides talk than you see one RTP steam from >> 8.15.244.11 >> in one direction to port 10766 and one from 64.156.174.71 going to the >> other >> direction to port 19612 >> >> Roni Even >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> >> > Christer Holmberg >> > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:54 PM >> > To: Nitin Kapoor; sip@ietf.org >> > Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call >> > >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > It is possible. >> > >> > In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP only >> > talks about where media is to be sent - not where it comes from. >> > >> > In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has its >> > own c- line, each with a different IP address. >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Christer >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: sip-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Nitin Kapoor >> > Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM >> > To: sip@ietf.org >> > Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call >> > >> > Hello All, >> > >> > I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two >> > media >> > streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone) >> > >> > I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well >> > as >> > the RTP traces too. >> > >> > As per the traces one RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and the >> > other >> > is coming from 8.15.244.11. >> > >> > Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two >> > media >> > streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if >> > this is >> > possible then what is the scenario where its possible. >> > >> > Please find the attached traces for the same. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Nitin Kapoor >> > General Telecom >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip >> > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol >> > Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip >> > Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip >> >> >> > > --0023545be1b4756261047b07cc81 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello,

Can anyone help me out please on this.

Thanks,
Niti= n Kapoor

2009/12/16 Nitin Kapoor <nitinkapoorr@gmail.= com>
Hello Roni,
I still have the doubt.. the point you have mentioned that the the RTP is= the unidirectional and because of that it is showing me two RTP streams. <= br>
But if we are decoding the RTP packets and whenever i am trying to hear= the messages then i can see that both have the different conversion..which= is confusing me lot... because without CONFERENCE call how one call have t= wo different conversion or RTP stream=A0 in one dialog...

Please correct me if i am wrong.

<= br>Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor

2009/12/10 Ron= i Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>

This is a normal call, RTP is unidirectional and this is why you see two RTP streams one from each side for each media channel.

Roni

=A0

From:= Nitin Kapoor [mailto:nitinka= poorr@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:03 PM
To: Roni Even
Cc: Christer Holmberg; sip@ietf.org


Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call

=A0

Roni,

So is that the normal call.. I mean is it possible or you have seen any iss= ue into it..

Please help me on this.

Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor

2009/12/10 Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>

Hi,
I looked at the SDP you send, you are seeing two RTP streams, one for each<= br> direction. Since both sides talk than you see one RTP steam from 8.15.244.1= 1
in one direction to port 10766 and one from 64.156.174.71 going to the othe= r
direction to port 19612

Roni Even


> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bo= unces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounc= es@ietf.org] On Behalf Of

> Christer Holmberg
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:54 PM
> To: Nitin Kapoor; si= p@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It is possible.
>
> In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP only > talks about where media is to be sent - not where it comes from.
>
> In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has it= s
> own c- line, each with a different IP address.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bo= unces@ietf.org on behalf of Nitin Kapoor
> Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM
> To: sip@ietf.org=
> Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call
>
> Hello All,
>
> I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two<= br> > media
> streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone)
>
> I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well=
> as
> the RTP traces too.
>
> As per the traces one =A0RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and th= e
> other
> is coming from 8.15.244.11.
>
> Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two > media
> streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if > this is
> possible then what is the scenario where its possible.
>
> Please find the attached traces for the same.
>
> Thanks,
> Nitin Kapoor
> General Telecom
>

> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list =A0https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping@ietf= .org for new developments on the application of sip

=A0



--0023545be1b4756261047b07cc81-- From dworley@nortel.com Fri Dec 18 14:01:35 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41483A67F3 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:01:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.556 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qsJIV0GPI8Xz for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:01:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from zrtps0kp.nortel.com (zrtps0kp.nortel.com [47.140.192.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035C03A68FE for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:01:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com (zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com [47.140.202.46]) by zrtps0kp.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id nBIM1BV05346; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:01:11 GMT Received: from [47.16.90.165] ([47.16.90.165]) by zrtphxs1.corp.nortel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:00:55 -0500 From: "Dale Worley" To: Nitin Kapoor In-Reply-To: References: <4b213744.06e2660a.5909.37ce@mx.google.com> <4b213f9e.0f0db80a.58b0.2ebc@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Nortel Networks Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:00:55 -0500 Message-Id: <1261173655.3728.22.camel@khone.us.nortel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Dec 2009 22:00:56.0085 (UTC) FILETIME=[92F45450:01CA802D] Cc: sip@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:01:36 -0000 On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 16:55 -0500, Nitin Kapoor wrote: > Can anyone help me out please on this. If we are to help, you will have to provide more information than you have. At a minimum, we need to see: the SDP offer the SDP answer a description of each RTP stream you see, including its source address and its destination address Dale From nitinkapoorr@gmail.com Fri Dec 18 14:03:20 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F3D3A679C for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:03:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.528 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.528 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.070, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DMTOH+XyAafQ for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:03:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED6F3A6403 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:03:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so757300qwb.31 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:03:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=p7SBupo0Fm1zmJiSnkgpzRBRYTNQKNe0jDW08Lqd4bY=; b=NCIgpePUMi1dukwt5CXqqDrPpd+Z2Q2PW5bDXmMky5nobYjzdDDqSnf0EHg3NERTlI LvnDbVkXIdukFUbi9MaJZvJpZ1aTZWgXNYI2DGbF/EsNe+NKUpIjW4+TLP4cqQbvAG4Q edIs2iDCHR2jeAfv7d3tauyqsBpM0RrQDsC+4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=LDTgwsnNxL6s8JiXHQH0HynUB1hmQNEdOW7JwpPD9oHXCwRTlr3xAM4IUQnnDJ+4qf MiWzbsLZ9G/6ByI+EHXCyJ7xJLALLhfv6nxXi04kEVj2rC83Cccs5ZLcldOBfYTHUoUD 9gLvFbulXhwWjKB0uVPEGSeRc1IPXFUlAB7pQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.118.6 with SMTP id t6mr2300065qcq.39.1261173781953; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:03:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1261173655.3728.22.camel@khone.us.nortel.com> References: <4b213744.06e2660a.5909.37ce@mx.google.com> <4b213f9e.0f0db80a.58b0.2ebc@mx.google.com> <1261173655.3728.22.camel@khone.us.nortel.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:03:01 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nitin Kapoor To: Dale Worley Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd5c6ca45fee6047b07e7a8 Cc: sip@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:03:20 -0000 --000e0cd5c6ca45fee6047b07e7a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dale, I have the ethreal traces along with RTP stream... i can provide you that..if that can help to debug the issue. Thanks, Nitin Kapoor 2009/12/18 Dale Worley > On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 16:55 -0500, Nitin Kapoor wrote: > > Can anyone help me out please on this. > > If we are to help, you will have to provide more information than you > have. At a minimum, we need to see: > > the SDP offer > the SDP answer > a description of each RTP stream you see, including its source address > and its destination address > > Dale > > > --000e0cd5c6ca45fee6047b07e7a8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dale,

I have the ethreal traces along with RTP stream... i can provi= de you that..if that can help to debug the issue.

Thanks,
Nitin K= apoor

2009/12/18 Dale Worley <dworley@nortel.com><= /span>
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 16:55 -0500, Nitin Kapoor wrote:
> Can anyone help me out please on this.

If we are to help, you will have to provide more information than you=
have. =A0At a minimum, we need to see:

the SDP offer
the SDP answer
a description of each RTP stream you see, including its source address
and its destination address

Dale



--000e0cd5c6ca45fee6047b07e7a8-- From Fred_Stacey@Mitel.com Sat Dec 19 12:26:12 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C493A682C for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:26:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.647 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.463, BAYES_40=-0.185] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KWgW8RoA4W74 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:26:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mitel.com (smtp.mitel.com [216.191.234.102]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2E73A6803 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:26:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (smtp.mitel.com [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.mitel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2DE2C019 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:25:52 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (virusonly) at mitel.com Received: from smtp.mitel.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.mitel.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kIdy3r9zo6Xs for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:25:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from ottlnmta.mitel.com (ottlnmta.mitel.com [10.44.16.150]) by smtp.mitel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3C02C014 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:25:52 -0500 (EST) From: Fred_Stacey@Mitel.com To: sip@ietf.org Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 15:25:30 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on OTTLNMTA/Mitel(Release 6.5.6FP3|March 27, 2008) at 12/19/2009 03:25:52 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [Sip] Fred Stacey is out of the office. X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:26:12 -0000 I will be out of the office starting 12/19/2009 and will not return until 01/04/2010. For Sun Microsystems related issues, please contact Arnaud Bellens For 5560 IPT related issues, please contact Simon Binder Otherwise, if the matter is of an urgent nature, please contact Stephen Bray or Tim Kostyniuk From nitinkapoorr@gmail.com Mon Dec 21 03:04:46 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD253A6933 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:04:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.335 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.335 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.151, BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EGTpqKuoaH8C for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:04:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47BD3A691A for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:04:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so1123335qwb.31 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:04:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UfXKBpayEHFVxiBcXyyPwJAZY/k6dfAMAbBMNuofJvQ=; b=kTMvw0ztbMS45uJ4sY219zePIciA551PxPaugcyff2vk5ziTtISAsboetgar06xuyH XhFq7jJ553jG3wPgO2MsA7V+vpqGO+JAut298j1fn0FgpumhPiP+Qd4r+9FLSPIrTj/n Q6NdNt2Ie/ZVlExXZ/EIGge1DkDx9MfoxvSkY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=kxfsuLSogQPFv3fljh7D7xZJUvkgxUPA/xv81GpM/orquGHuZsi2IIsJPiuRnx1wdv gWU8Ww9WPpzbQz/fp1vVLMDXAZEXAY+xwuTWy+xbFso8phpY/TGmi47qkZV9n3ZTqb5u 6KD/OX9Or1XF1+fiDX1SGgTnc9YHw60DPKNWU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.23.83 with SMTP id q19mr3262794qcb.37.1261393465845; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:04:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4b213744.06e2660a.5909.37ce@mx.google.com> <4b213f9e.0f0db80a.58b0.2ebc@mx.google.com> <62254A3918D44EA8A6742537BD2325F6@cellebrum.com> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:04:25 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nitin Kapoor To: Amit Vijayvargiya Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163641704b742a85047b3b0d8b Cc: sip@ietf.org, Christer Holmberg Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:04:47 -0000 --00163641704b742a85047b3b0d8b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Amit, Okay... but whenever i am trying to decode the RTP packets and trying to hear the conversation of this.. it seems to be a different conversation... and which is confusing me a lot. Also if you think after hearing the conversation of this call...the call is still normal then could you please elaborate some evidence on which behalf its look okay to you... Thanks for your help in advance... Thanks, Nitin Kapoor 2009/12/21 Amit Vijayvargiya > Dear Nitin, > > > > In these traces every thing seems fine & it=92s a normal call. RTP Packet= s > are bidirectional > > > > 64.156.174.71(10766) =DF--------=E0 8.15.244.11(19612) > > > > It should be a single conversation. > > > > > > > > *Regards,* > *Amit Vijayvargiya * > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Nitin Kapoor [mailto:nitinkapoorr@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, December 21, 2009 10:16 AM > *To:* Amit Vijayvargiya > > *Cc:* Christer Holmberg > *Subject:* Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > > > Hello Amit, > > Please find the attached traces... > > Thanks, > Nitin Kapoor > > 2009/12/19 Amit Vijayvargiya > > Hi Nitin, > > > > Can you share the ethereal trace of RTP packets. > > > > > *Thanks & Regards,* > > *Amit Vijayvargiya * > ------------------------------ > > *From:* sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of = *Nitin > Kapoor > *Sent:* Saturday, December 19, 2009 3:26 AM > > > *To:* sip@ietf.org > *Cc:* Christer Holmberg > > *Subject:* Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > > > Hello, > > Can anyone help me out please on this. > > Thanks, > Nitin Kapoor > > 2009/12/16 Nitin Kapoor > > Hello Roni, > > I still have the doubt.. the point you have mentioned that the the RTP is > the unidirectional and because of that it is showing me two RTP streams. > > But if we are decoding the RTP packets and whenever i am trying to hear t= he > messages then i can see that both have the different conversion..which is > confusing me lot... because without CONFERENCE call how one call have two > different conversion or RTP stream in one dialog... > > Please correct me if i am wrong. > > > > Thanks, > Nitin Kapoor > > 2009/12/10 Roni Even > > This is a normal call, RTP is unidirectional and this is why you see two > RTP streams one from each side for each media channel. > > Roni > > > > *From:* Nitin Kapoor [mailto:nitinkapoorr@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:03 PM > *To:* Roni Even > *Cc:* Christer Holmberg; sip@ietf.org > > > *Subject:* Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > > > Roni, > > So is that the normal call.. I mean is it possible or you have seen any > issue into it.. > > Please help me on this. > > Thanks, > Nitin Kapoor > > 2009/12/10 Roni Even > > Hi, > I looked at the SDP you send, you are seeing two RTP streams, one for eac= h > direction. Since both sides talk than you see one RTP steam from > 8.15.244.11 > in one direction to port 10766 and one from 64.156.174.71 going to the > other > direction to port 19612 > > Roni Even > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > > > Christer Holmberg > > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:54 PM > > To: Nitin Kapoor; sip@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > > > > > Hi, > > > > It is possible. > > > > In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP only > > talks about where media is to be sent - not where it comes from. > > > > In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has its > > own c- line, each with a different IP address. > > > > Regards, > > > > Christer > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sip-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Nitin Kapoor > > Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM > > To: sip@ietf.org > > Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call > > > > Hello All, > > > > I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two > > media > > streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone) > > > > I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well > > as > > the RTP traces too. > > > > As per the traces one RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and the > > other > > is coming from 8.15.244.11. > > > > Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two > > media > > streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if > > this is > > possible then what is the scenario where its possible. > > > > Please find the attached traces for the same. > > > > Thanks, > > Nitin Kapoor > > General Telecom > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > > Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > > Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > This message and its attachments contain confidential information and may > also contain legally privileged information. This message is intended sol= ely > for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this > message (or authorized to receive for addressee), you may not copy or > deliver any part of this message or its attachments to anyone or use any > part of this message or its attachments. Rather, you should permanently > delete this message and its attachments (and all copies) from your system > and kindly notify the sender by reply E-mail. Any content of this message > and its attachments that does not relate to the official business of SPIC= E > DIGITAL or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries must be taken not to have b= een > sent or endorsed by any of them. Opinions and information in this E-mail > that do not relate to the official business of SPICE DIGITAL., shall be > understood as neither given nor endorsed by SPICE DIGITAL.. Any > action/proceeding/opportunity upon the contents of this E-mail taken by n= ot > intended addressee shall attract liabilities both criminal and civil agai= nst > such addressee. > > E-mail communications are not private and no warranty is made that e-mail > communications are timely, secure or free from computer virus or other > defect. > > > > ------------------------------ > This message and its attachments contain confidential information and may > also contain legally privileged information. This message is intended sol= ely > for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this > message (or authorized to receive for addressee), you may not copy or > deliver any part of this message or its attachments to anyone or use any > part of this message or its attachments. Rather, you should permanently > delete this message and its attachments (and all copies) from your system > and kindly notify the sender by reply E-mail. Any content of this message > and its attachments that does not relate to the official business of SPIC= E > DIGITAL or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries must be taken not to have b= een > sent or endorsed by any of them. Opinions and information in this E-mail > that do not relate to the official business of SPICE DIGITAL., shall be > understood as neither given nor endorsed by SPICE DIGITAL.. Any > action/proceeding/opportunity upon the contents of this E-mail taken by n= ot > intended addressee shall attract liabilities both criminal and civil agai= nst > such addressee. > > E-mail communications are not private and no warranty is made that e-mail > communications are timely, secure or free from computer virus or other > defect. > --00163641704b742a85047b3b0d8b Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Amit,

Okay... but whenever i am trying to decode the RTP packe= ts and trying to hear the conversation of this.. it seems to be a different= conversation... and which is confusing me a lot.

Also if you think = after hearing the conversation of this call...the call is still normal then= could you please elaborate some evidence on which behalf its look okay to = you...

Thanks for your help in advance...

Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor
2009/12/21 Amit Vijayvargiya <amit.vijayvargiya= @spicedigital.in>

Dear Nitin,

=A0

In these trace= s every thing seems fine & it=92s a normal call. RTP Packets are bidire= ctional

=A0

64.156.174.71(= 10766)=A0 =DF--------=E0 8.15.244.11(19612) =A0=A0

=A0

It should be a= single conversation.

=A0

=A0



Regards,
Amit Vijayvargiya <= /font>

From: Nitin Kapoor [mailto:nitinkapoorr@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 21,= 2009 10:16 AM
To: Amit Vijayvargiya

=

Cc: Christer Holmberg
Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Med= ia Stream in One call

=A0

Hello Amit,

Please find the attached traces...

Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor

2009/12/19 Amit Vijayvargiya <amit.vijayvargiya@spice= digital.in>

Hi Nitin,

=A0

Can you share = the ethereal trace of RTP packets.

=A0


Thanks & Regards,

Amit Vijayvargiya <= /font>

From: sip-bounces@ietf.= org [mailto:s= ip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nitin Kapoor<= br> Sent: Saturday, December 1= 9, 2009 3:26 AM


To: sip@ietf.org
Cc: Christer Holmberg

Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call

=A0

Hello,

Can anyone help me out please on this.

Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor

2009/12/16 Nitin Kapoor <nitinkapoorr@gmail.com>

Hello Roni,

I still have the doubt.. the point you have mentioned that the the RTP is t= he unidirectional and because of that it is showing me two RTP streams.

But if we are decoding the RTP packets and whenever i am trying to hear the= messages then i can see that both have the different conversion..which is = confusing me lot... because without CONFERENCE call how one call have two d= ifferent conversion or RTP stream=A0 in one dialog...

Please correct me if i am wrong.



Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor

2009/12/10 Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>

This is a= normal call, RTP is unidirectional and this is why you see two RTP streams one from each side for each media channel.

Roni

=A0

=A0

Roni,

So is that the normal call.. I mean is it possible or you have seen any iss= ue into it..

Please help me on this.

Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor

2009/12/10 Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>

Hi,
I looked at the SDP you send, you are seeing two RTP streams, one for each<= br> direction. Since both sides talk than you see one RTP steam from 8.15.244.1= 1
in one direction to port 10766 and one from 64.156.174.71 going to the othe= r
direction to port 19612

Roni Even


> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bo= unces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of

> Christer Holmberg
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 3:54 PM
> To: Nitin Kapoor; si= p@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It is possible.
>
> In theory this could be done with a single c- line, because SDP only > talks about where media is to be sent - not where it comes from.
>
> In reality, however, I assume this is a case where each m- line has it= s
> own c- line, each with a different IP address.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sip-bo= unces@ietf.org on behalf of Nitin Kapoor
> Sent: Thu 12/10/2009 2:10 PM
> To: sip@ietf.org=
> Subject: [Sip] Two Media Stream in One call
>
> Hello All,
>
> I am facing the issue with one of my customer where he is getting two<= br> > media
> streams in one call and they are using SBC(Nextone)
>
> I checked the signaling traces and everything looks okay to me as well=
> as
> the RTP traces too.
>
> As per the traces one =A0RTP packet is going from 64.156.174.71 and th= e
> other
> is coming from 8.15.244.11.
>
> Could you please let me know is it possible where i can have the two > media
> streams in one call when this is the not the conference call. And if > this is
> possible then what is the scenario where its possible.
>
> Please find the attached traces for the same.
>
> Thanks,
> Nitin Kapoor
> General Telecom
>

> ________________= _______________________________
> Sip mailing list =A0https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping@ietf= .org for new developments on the application of sip

=A0

=A0

=A0

=A0

This message = and its attachments contain confidential information and may also contain l= egally privileged information. This message is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indi= cated in this message (or authorized to receive for addressee), you may not= copy or deliver any part of this message or its attachments to anyone or u= se any part of this message or its attachments. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its at= tachments (and all copies) from your system and kindly notify the sender by= reply E-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments that does no= t relate to the official business of SPICE DIGITAL or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries must be taken not t= o have been sent or endorsed by any of them. Opinions and information in th= is E-mail that do not relate to the official business of SPICE DIGITAL., sh= all be understood as neither given nor endorsed by SPICE DIGITAL.. Any action/proceeding/opportunity upon the= contents of this E-mail taken by not intended addressee shall attract liab= ilities both criminal and civil against such addressee.

E-mail communications are not private and no warranty is made that e-mail c= ommunications are timely, secure or free from computer virus or other defec= t.

=A0


This message and its attach= ments contain confidential information and may also contain legally privile= ged information. This message is intended solely for the named addressee. I= f you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or authorized to receive for addressee), you may not copy= or deliver any part of this message or its attachments to anyone or use an= y part of this message or its attachments. Rather, you should permanently d= elete this message and its attachments (and all copies) from your system and kindly notify the sender by reply E-= mail. Any content of this message and its attachments that does not relate = to the official business of SPICE DIGITAL or its affiliates and/or subsidia= ries must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. Opinions and information in this E-mail t= hat do not relate to the official business of SPICE DIGITAL., shall be unde= rstood as neither given nor endorsed by SPICE DIGITAL.. Any action/proceedi= ng/opportunity upon the contents of this E-mail taken by not intended addressee shall attract liabilities b= oth criminal and civil against such addressee.

E-mail communications are not private and no warranty is made that e-mail c= ommunications are timely, secure or free from computer virus or other defec= t.

--00163641704b742a85047b3b0d8b-- From gupta.vineet@gmail.com Tue Dec 22 03:57:59 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63F43A6AF4 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:57:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s8eWGL3WdZDC for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:57:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pz0-f176.google.com (mail-pz0-f176.google.com [209.85.222.176]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16F13A69F1 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:57:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so4400338pzk.29 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:57:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=zXrS8xSzXB6nwlE+PMnZ3XQjKAVKviwFkEH6TwQKUbU=; b=xw4EKt4rkexPAMmkWOn8bXy0prsdMtDh4DSNEcQYicB/s27mYFV5lyx32jfqjuxbGJ Q5vd7jUbUn/qk3dSnm7yuQp4jCZ7ap3jQL5H5ACtb5Q2HsrhXuQpuTA93BH2Z2bOb3GX 3GfFJZ5Ulr9iHisk8B21UiIBxFoyS+7bEmpTA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Gi0MRpHDRhBpUm+fePQ0/C0mT3A2gVZwNiLTfnOevUL0DND+xj3dY34ZJ6HPP53BfT 1TPNeTNAsPIpKcrbARPKHBXqYVw++jw734pkuekwhqVZabOV9ooFoMWvgoXNiy280ilj XWdj60clD+ZZdTendSRK4pLhCoXlZgN+UyRu0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.80.18 with SMTP id h18mr3873755wal.53.1261483060186; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:57:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:27:40 +0530 Message-ID: <98abe9690912220357t62881642l2230f190cfb64888@mail.gmail.com> From: Vineet Gupta To: sip@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64d95feb14f8a047b4fe998 Subject: [Sip] Significance of port in maddr parameter. X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:57:59 -0000 --0016e64d95feb14f8a047b4fe998 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Can someone let me know why exactly following statement is present in RFC 3261: *"The maddr parameter indicates the server address to be contacted for this user, overriding any address derived from the host field. When an maddr parameter is present, the port and transport components of the URI apply to the address indicated in the maddr parameter value"* To be specific: a) What exactly can go wrong on using the port in maddr parameter? b) In what are situations where port present in Req-URI should be used rather than port present in maddr parameter? c) And in what situation port in maddr parameter should be used? Regards, Vineet. --0016e64d95feb14f8a047b4fe998 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,

Can someone let me know why exactly following statem= ent is present in RFC 3261:

"The madd= r parameter indicates the server address to be=A0contacted for this user, o= verriding any address derived from=A0the host field. =A0When an maddr pa= rameter is present, the port=A0and transport components of the URI apply to= the address=A0indicated in the maddr parameter value"

To be specific:
a) What exactly can go = wrong on using the port in maddr parameter?
b) In what are situat= ions where port present in Req-URI should be used rather than port present = in maddr parameter?=A0
c) And in what situation port in maddr parameter should be used?
=
=A0
Regards,
Vineet.
--0016e64d95feb14f8a047b4fe998-- From sresheno@cisco.com Tue Dec 22 23:18:56 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C376F3A6976 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:18:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.601, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_39=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OcUMsFmItlC2 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:18:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19013A65A6 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:18:51 -0800 (PST) Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAPtSMUurRN+K/2dsb2JhbADBCZcShDMEgn0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,440,1257120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="66681634" Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Dec 2009 07:18:29 +0000 Received: from xbh-bgl-411.cisco.com (xbh-bgl-411.cisco.com [72.163.129.201]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBN7HbY9004313 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:18:29 GMT Received: from xmb-bgl-41d.cisco.com ([72.163.129.219]) by xbh-bgl-411.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:48:27 +0530 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA83A0.1EF26E6A" Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:48:26 +0530 Message-ID: <98041FB94260464FB06D65C8E9E6473B2E76A8@XMB-BGL-41D.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Sip] Significance of port in maddr parameter. Thread-Index: AcqDQXuBtuvPSvePT7qr/sI2zV1bMQAXgRKQ References: From: "Sreerekha Shenoy (sresheno)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Dec 2009 07:18:27.0437 (UTC) FILETIME=[1F2A91D0:01CA83A0] Subject: Re: [Sip] Significance of port in maddr parameter. X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:18:57 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA83A0.1EF26E6A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Vineet, As per RFC 3261, I don't see a placeholder for port number in the maddr-param. The ABNF syntax for maddr goes as follows: maddr-param =3D "maddr=3D" host host =3D hostname / IPv4address / IPv6reference please explain on what do you mean by 'port in maddr param' Thanks, Best Regards, Rekha =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Today's Topics: 1. Significance of port in maddr parameter. (Vineet Gupta) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:27:40 +0530 From: Vineet Gupta Subject: [Sip] Significance of port in maddr parameter. To: sip@ietf.org Message-ID: <98abe9690912220357t62881642l2230f190cfb64888@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"iso-8859-1" Hi, Can someone let me know why exactly following statement is present in RFC 3261: *"The maddr parameter indicates the server address to be contacted for this user, overriding any address derived from the host field. When an maddr parameter is present, the port and transport components of the URI apply to the address indicated in the maddr parameter value"* To be specific: a) What exactly can go wrong on using the port in maddr parameter? b) In what are situations where port present in Req-URI should be used rather than port present in maddr parameter? c) And in what situation port in maddr parameter should be used? Regards, Vineet. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip End of Sip Digest, Vol 64, Issue 10 *********************************** ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA83A0.1EF26E6A Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: [Sip] Significance of port in maddr parameter.

Hi = Vineet,

As per RFC = 3261, I don’t see a placeholder for port = number in the = maddr-param.

The = ABNF syntax for maddr goes as follows:

maddr-param       = =3D  "maddr=3D" host

host        &nb= sp;    =3D  hostname / IPv4address / = IPv6reference

please explain = on what do you mean by 'port in maddr param'

Thanks,

Best = Regards,

Rekha

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Today's = Topics:

   = 1. Significance of port in maddr parameter. (Vineet = Gupta)


-------------------------------------------------------= ---------------

Message: = 1

Date: Tue, 22 = Dec 2009 17:27:40 +0530

From: Vineet = Gupta <gupta.vineet@gmail.com>

Subject: [Sip] = Significance of port in maddr parameter.

To: = sip@ietf.org

Message-ID:

        <98abe9690912220357t62881642l2230f190cfb64888@mail.g= mail.com>

Content-Type: = text/plain; charset=3D"iso-8859-1"

Hi,

Can someone = let me know why exactly following statement is present in = RFC

3261:

*"The = maddr parameter indicates the server address to be contacted for = this

user, = overriding any address derived from the host field.  When an = maddr

parameter is = present, the port and transport components of the URI apply = to

the address = indicated in the maddr parameter value"*

To be = specific:

a) What = exactly can go wrong on using the port in maddr = parameter?

b) In what are = situations where port present in Req-URI should be = used

rather than = port present in maddr parameter?

c) And in what = situation port in maddr parameter should be used?

Regards,

Vineet.

-------------- = next part --------------

An HTML = attachment was scrubbed...

URL: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/attachment= s/20091222/d7434e03/attachment.htm>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________<= /SPAN>

Sip mailing = list  https://www.ietf.org/m= ailman/listinfo/sip

This list is = for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol

Use = sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current = sip

Use = sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of = sip

End of Sip = Digest, Vol 64, Issue 10

***********************************

------_=_NextPart_001_01CA83A0.1EF26E6A-- From abhatnagar192006@gmail.com Tue Dec 22 23:55:23 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835943A6919 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:55:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.600, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_39=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mHaoLJEEm7iR for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:55:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f223.google.com (mail-bw0-f223.google.com [209.85.218.223]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDC33A65A6 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:55:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so4742557bwz.29 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:55:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gGzn+RmluuH4ER7SBLg2WkHFTDMsG3w9s6+oe9c5D5g=; b=wOyanFOoydbNFxT8+sBNLpb8tnxdKCu4HVzUEqEdGcdaUqpmCBv7W5WTH5Sxeq9SaZ XVKTFGc+Oo0xbFzrnmI1/maCagKGSStFD0lpJP/gSN8SscgcPmNJNd/99GFRAV4F0/JN jCDhdRWgRGKeJmd/Mh9JhIi5hicX7ed13RVhg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=uu2U+V5OmHv9Qt2Rq850ufIkFIasXu5BmZuUcyXBZ04lrva1C+a5C+TFD3S+rFxS21 QtfigFAYkzNOp5TZdscnN7eeWW8ULkrEXlR8WjOlVPNXSw0VsT3rl1jlt/LCZoSSFAAj H1AD7iJnH4wSgviRl2CfzfQCjp288ud1pSp1U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.10.2 with SMTP id n2mr6691127bkn.91.1261554902206; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:55:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <98041FB94260464FB06D65C8E9E6473B2E76A8@XMB-BGL-41D.cisco.com> References: <98041FB94260464FB06D65C8E9E6473B2E76A8@XMB-BGL-41D.cisco.com> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:25:02 +0030 Message-ID: From: aayush bhatnagar To: "Sreerekha Shenoy (sresheno)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: sip@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sip] Significance of port in maddr parameter. X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:55:23 -0000 Vineet, The maddr parameter can be present in the Via header and in the request URI. If present in the Via header, it signifies that the client is sending the request to a multicast receiver. Refer to section 18.1.1 of 3261 for this. It may be present in the Request URI...which means that the entry of the request uri is added as the only entry in the target set for the request. As for the port, it is not present in the maddr paramater. It is present in the sent-by parameter, or defaults to 5060 in case the sent-by parameter is absent. Hope this helps. For more info of maddr parameter usage, read sections 16.4, 16.5, 18.1.1, 18.1.2 and 19.1.1 of RFC 3261. On 23/12/2009, Sreerekha Shenoy (sresheno) wrote: > Hi Vineet, > As per RFC 3261, I don't see a placeholder for port number in the > maddr-param. > The ABNF syntax for maddr goes as follows: > > maddr-param = "maddr=" host > host = hostname / IPv4address / IPv6reference > > please explain on what do you mean by 'port in maddr param' > > > > Thanks, > Best Regards, > Rekha > > ======================================================================== > ========= > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Significance of port in maddr parameter. (Vineet Gupta) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:27:40 +0530 > From: Vineet Gupta > Subject: [Sip] Significance of port in maddr parameter. > To: sip@ietf.org > Message-ID: > <98abe9690912220357t62881642l2230f190cfb64888@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi, > > Can someone let me know why exactly following statement is present in > RFC > 3261: > > *"The maddr parameter indicates the server address to be contacted for > this > user, overriding any address derived from the host field. When an maddr > parameter is present, the port and transport components of the URI apply > to > the address indicated in the maddr parameter value"* > > To be specific: > a) What exactly can go wrong on using the port in maddr parameter? > b) In what are situations where port present in Req-URI should be used > rather than port present in maddr parameter? > c) And in what situation port in maddr parameter should be used? > > Regards, > Vineet. > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > attachment.htm> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip > > End of Sip Digest, Vol 64, Issue 10 > *********************************** > -- aayush http://in.linkedin.com/in/abhatnagar19 ======