From nobody Thu May 4 13:23:43 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1618F126BF0 for ; Thu, 4 May 2017 13:23:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=neustar.biz Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5RC9xJy2pwpb for ; Thu, 4 May 2017 13:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DA2B127977 for ; Thu, 4 May 2017 13:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0078666.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v44KDMeP017359; Thu, 4 May 2017 16:23:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neustar.biz; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=neustar-biz; bh=6mQIpa7x9wC0P1si26Rb7A7A10FsjEi6F3UjA1/ArBw=; b=KdFEfqKGJQLjKJ3rTEGeu45Ve+j4f9+sYKrGiCZ8KL/86xi7/tXUie9DlEB/ma91GYBO ZbLbVN3ahRpwn1Q7jtAfn0a1YIbPn8DN5kRzJ61gdcYgaDWxnyUc26gdSuWeG6u/jmii TN/LaO7M+zzVZWyjpJ3dM55WAD+DjDPg3kX5Snix0WWXR2Eb+XKs4mN6U6IreDl+TlEZ p5EPXRD15qK71Taf6Z3+kRNZpVkQPJ19n4Te/52Mc3J97L1ZUrl7OY9VvtyP/c6XSh2e 3XGTYC352k1s/F1XehnJsG+Vl/S9RLr1+/NjokqQjglQti92A3E0NHdCi9BAi8UfgymV kg== Received: from stntexhc10.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by mx0a-0018ba01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2a72qhc9y4-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 04 May 2017 16:23:34 -0400 Received: from STNTEXMB10.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.5.33]) by stntexhc10.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.4.170]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Thu, 4 May 2017 16:23:32 -0400 From: "Peterson, Jon" To: Gonzalo Camarillo , "sipbrandy@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Sipbrandy] Status of our drafts Thread-Index: AQHSiDPbX+QGh5qrxUua6j2r0pa6aKGYC9IAgE0MWgA= Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 20:23:31 +0000 Message-ID: References: <55773ace-3e3e-16b9-003d-7256e42342c8@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.3.160329 x-originating-ip: [10.96.12.176] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <25FD4562A2338F4DABD0DEB19C49417C@neustar.biz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-05-04_12:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1705040292 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Sipbrandy] Status of our drafts X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 20:23:42 -0000 Hello, Although we did not meet in Chicago, I did submit a new version of draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec before the meeting. This incorporated the feedback from the previous session, as well as some other points that had come up related to Adam Roach's comments on the interaction with connected identity. I have had one offline discussion recently about the need to get connected identity right for core STIR, not exclusively for use with the SIPBRANDY profile of STIR. I think there are probably some good reasons to try to get that properly defined. We had talked a bit here about trying to patch RFC4916 for STIR in the context of this working group, but probably I'll submit that as an individual and at some point we can decide where that work should live. The RTPSEC draft here should probably reference that patch to connected identity. But other than that, I'm not sure I have a lot of outstanding action items for the RTPSEC document. We set out to define a pretty simple profile, just kind of a framework document for how you combine a bunch of things we've defined elsewhere, and at this point I think the big ideas are in place. Jon Peterson Neustar, Inc. On 3/16/17, 11:47 AM, "Sipbrandy on behalf of Gonzalo Camarillo" wrote: >Authors, > >could you please send us a status update per my email below? > >Thanks, > >Gonzalo > >On 16/02/2017 11:05 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> even if we will not have a SIPBRANDY session in Chicago, it would be >> useful for the working group to discuss what are the next steps on the >>list. >>=20 >> To start those discussions, we would like to ask the authors of our two >> working group items below to let the list know what is the status of >> their draft and what are the next steps: >>=20 >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp/ >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec/ >>=20 >> We would also like to ask the authors of the MMUSIC draft below, which >> is related to the SIPBRANDY work, to give us a status update: >>=20 >>=20 >>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negoti >>ation/ >>=20 >> Thanks, >>=20 >> Gonzalo >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Sipbrandy mailing list >> Sipbrandy@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy >>=20 > >_______________________________________________ >Sipbrandy mailing list >Sipbrandy@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy From nobody Mon May 8 01:20:00 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C47D120724 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 01:19:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.322 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.322 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hhbFdEjMOopC for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 01:19:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5502127F0E for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 01:19:56 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-663149a00000015f-8b-59102a2b407b Received: from ESESSHC016.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.66]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 41.74.00351.B2A20195; Mon, 8 May 2017 10:19:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [100.94.37.241] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.339.0; Mon, 8 May 2017 10:19:54 +0200 To: Andy Hutton References: <55773ace-3e3e-16b9-003d-7256e42342c8@ericsson.com> CC: From: Gonzalo Camarillo Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 11:19:54 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7k662lkCkwdffIhaX1m1lslix7hST A5PHzll32T2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJXRfPwxc8EtoYqu28ENjP/5uhg5OCQETCS2 TxDsYuTiEBI4wiix68lxRghnFaPE8ZszmbsYOTmEBXQlXu9YzghiiwhoS7ybsoMVoqiNUeLA n+1gRcwCEhI7p3SxgNhsAhYSW27dB7N5Bewllh9ZzgpiswioSGy+/hMsLioQI9Gy5AMjRI2g xMmZT8DinAKBEkeOtDODXMcsoCmxfpc+xHh5ie1v54CtEgK6YfmzFpYJjAKzkHTPQuiYhaRj ASPzKkbR4tTipNx0IyO91KLM5OLi/Dy9vNSSTYzAkDy45bfBDsaXzx0PMQpwMCrx8D6YwR8p xJpYVlyZe4hRgoNZSYQ3R0MgUog3JbGyKrUoP76oNCe1+BCjNAeLkjiv474LEUIC6Yklqdmp qQWpRTBZJg5OqQbGiVF2oS90pd/qLD+6ln/+pM4FUlNZpk0LF3S77mK/gKXNzODHXk+ui1I/ 6v1n7vq2M+LotA2lplP7Tn25N/U7f1bHqZzAbYFT+o1nnvgidbklco5LScF1mynsk148LlBZ sPeFlk8il4aFdKOh/2rtzmnzrp96436lo1mek/m9uPJfiwXn1y/KVmIpzkg01GIuKk4EACh1 /gZFAgAA Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Sipbrandy] Status of our drafts X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 08:19:58 -0000 Hi Andy, please, note that draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp has expired: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp/ What are your plans to keep it alive? Thanks, Gonzalo On 20/03/2017 1:35 PM, Andy Hutton wrote: > > Regarding the status > of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation-00. > This draft will be discussed during the MMUSIC session at IETF98 next > week and I am hoping that MMUSIC will agree to adopt this draft. The > comments received so far on the MMUSIC list have all been positive > regarding this. We need this draft to be adopted by MMUSIC to allow > draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp to progress since it documents the fact that > an update to RFC 4568 is needed to allow SRTP to be negotiated using the > RTP/AVP profile. > > Please support the adoption of > draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation in MMUSIC. > > Regards > Andy > > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo > > > wrote: > > Hi, > > even if we will not have a SIPBRANDY session in Chicago, it would be > useful for the working group to discuss what are the next steps on > the list. > > To start those discussions, we would like to ask the authors of our two > working group items below to let the list know what is the status of > their draft and what are the next steps: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec/ > > > We would also like to ask the authors of the MMUSIC draft below, which > is related to the SIPBRANDY work, to give us a status update: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation/ > > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > _______________________________________________ > Sipbrandy mailing list > Sipbrandy@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy > > > From nobody Mon May 8 02:12:40 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC18E129406 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 02:12:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.491 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=sonusnetworks.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fLsMDEZy6ktO for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 02:12:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-126.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-126.mimecast.com [216.205.24.126]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB9AC1289C3 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 02:12:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=SonusNetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-sonusnet-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=LGzLLj7fhxRjI10PwmXUDz5a/16WVTAufPjIUntKtyM=; b=NnzRkE7Lyr7lkS8+Gl/jdmeQ30Ab2yECmkhgwg9LQaF5IZ6ZLR4pz9tQEr7Q3ClXjB6TgFJISdKnbt0S1zP1fMyhi7xfLydY2Dfz/eeRybB/3AnzgKQJQBTJc3Yphs81qiqpmdyfdQ6GjwDiNw+l4JTSB363PBwIPmx1PwVwz8I= Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01lp0120.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.120]) (Using TLS) by us-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-131-UVlU-q5xMRmaaOcDRc7ldg-1; Mon, 08 May 2017 05:12:34 -0400 Received: from SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.210.141) by SN2PR03MB2351.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.210.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1075.11; Mon, 8 May 2017 09:12:31 +0000 Received: from SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.210.141]) by SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.210.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1075.019; Mon, 8 May 2017 09:12:31 +0000 From: "Asveren, Tolga" To: Gonzalo Camarillo , Andy Hutton CC: "sipbrandy@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Sipbrandy] Status of our drafts Thread-Index: AQHSiDPi5pHrTmEZMEGj1oy5FRpwa6Gdy7CAgEzLpgCAAA3goA== Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 09:12:30 +0000 Message-ID: References: <55773ace-3e3e-16b9-003d-7256e42342c8@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [73.29.18.75] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN2PR03MB2351; 7:5LY+ZcGrQzM8sP1YaLVL7Du/U210i3zbQKj3y7L7J8nMaXPUzjkLowBsBs29ELLrwxy5TsTRysjTdqganE5XgckhWl2L+38HxuEwl0IPFQLyP3SOTWNTAM/6CVG7LfMCrddpqg6Q/NtD3MWXwZp5X9C1Lz/eTUNpwNNQP6aG9Lp75yMx8CGdSrj65/3e8psozi861mWl7O2VUlhO1HD14dzhbivlisbr7FjI1BXtQ/fyxZ2krLMeb6qbuRVyzkym8aZtuOgAyngF7yEH+V0g0tK5H9dx4k2O0AnO0uRKUgisdqsBzf/0Wv0W7ctZRDvjPn+ayryyuqR7E40EkjP/FA==; 20:gNMwkpmckh8WivhOSOZSJXCL0BAajHKQnYBYc3AvAPCfRYxxlt1IH+YSc8TxgnytFwZ7w5PuWgsNgXPNnYQxUopYQkTmUShFzEyvQaWfJXbYv5GTLSZDMsAK3UNZQ1nkwomWYoUd3DKfmmepT3zhQ5I2T+ZCdSulkPV6MqNdIeg= x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9d85c54d-23ce-4fbf-bc94-08d495f25b4a x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:SN2PR03MB2351; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(37575265505322)(120809045254105); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(6041248)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(6072148); SRVR:SN2PR03MB2351; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN2PR03MB2351; x-forefront-prvs: 0301360BF5 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39410400002)(39400400002)(39450400003)(39830400002)(377454003)(13464003)(24454002)(3846002)(33656002)(6116002)(9686003)(102836003)(2900100001)(86362001)(7696004)(39060400002)(77096006)(25786009)(3660700001)(6436002)(8676002)(55016002)(99286003)(2906002)(4326008)(53546009)(189998001)(5660300001)(2950100002)(38730400002)(81166006)(74316002)(478600001)(8936002)(6506006)(229853002)(7736002)(6246003)(122556002)(66066001)(53936002)(6306002)(305945005)(76176999)(54356999)(50986999)(3280700002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN2PR03MB2351; H:SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sonusnet.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 May 2017 09:12:31.0569 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 29a671dc-ed7e-4a54-b1e5-8da1eb495dc3 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN2PR03MB2351 X-MC-Unique: UVlU-q5xMRmaaOcDRc7ldg-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Sipbrandy] Status of our drafts X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 09:12:39 -0000 I hope this draft will proceed forward and eventually -and hopefully soon- = become a RFC. It addresses a real problem with a practical solution. Just as additional info, it seems likely that the "sister document" draft-h= utton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation-00 will be adopted as a WG soon. Thanks, Tolga -----Original Message----- From: Sipbrandy [mailto:sipbrandy-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gonzalo Ca= marillo Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 4:20 AM To: Andy Hutton Cc: sipbrandy@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sipbrandy] Status of our drafts Hi Andy, please, note that draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp has expired: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp/ What are your plans to keep it alive? Thanks, Gonzalo On 20/03/2017 1:35 PM, Andy Hutton wrote: >=20 > Regarding the status > of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiat= ion-00. > This draft will be discussed during the MMUSIC session at IETF98 next=20 > week and I am hoping that MMUSIC will agree to adopt this draft. The=20 > comments received so far on the MMUSIC list have all been positive=20 > regarding this. We need this draft to be adopted by MMUSIC to allow=20 > draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp to progress since it documents the fact=20 > that an update to RFC 4568 is needed to allow SRTP to be negotiated=20 > using the RTP/AVP profile. >=20 > Please support the adoption of > draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation in MMUSIC. >=20 > Regards > Andy >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo=20 > > > wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > even if we will not have a SIPBRANDY session in Chicago, it would be > useful for the working group to discuss what are the next steps on > the list. >=20 > To start those discussions, we would like to ask the authors of our t= wo > working group items below to let the list know what is the status of > their draft and what are the next steps: >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec/ > >=20 > We would also like to ask the authors of the MMUSIC draft below, whic= h > is related to the SIPBRANDY work, to give us a status update: >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-ne= gotiation/ > =20 > gotiation/> >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Gonzalo >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Sipbrandy mailing list > Sipbrandy@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy > >=20 >=20 _______________________________________________ Sipbrandy mailing list Sipbrandy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy From nobody Mon May 8 07:42:22 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietf.org Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0313312422F; Mon, 8 May 2017 05:24:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: sipbrandy@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.50.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <149424626593.20920.7519901094245014210@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 05:24:26 -0700 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 May 2017 07:42:21 -0700 Subject: [Sipbrandy] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp-02.txt X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 12:24:26 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the SIP Best-practice Recommendations Against Network Dangers to privacY of the IETF. Title : An Opportunistic Approach for Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (OSRTP) Authors : Alan Johnston Bernard Aboba Andy Hutton Roland Jesske Thomas Stach Filename : draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp-02.txt Pages : 8 Date : 2017-05-08 Abstract: Opportunistic Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (OSRTP) allows encrypted media to be used in environments where support for encryption is not known in advance, and not required. OSRTP is an implementation of Opportunistic Security, as defined in RFC 7435. OSRTP does not require advanced SDP extensions or features and is fully backwards compatible with existing secure and insecure implementations. OSRTP is not specific to any key management technique for SRTP. OSRTP is a transitional approach useful for migrating existing deployments of real-time communications to a fully encrypted and authenticated state. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp-02 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Tue May 9 10:40:00 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietf.org Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827F912EAAB for ; Tue, 9 May 2017 10:39:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.50.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <149435159953.22615.17015612377096644703.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 10:39:59 -0700 From: IETF Secretariat Archived-At: Subject: [Sipbrandy] Milestones changed for sipbrandy WG X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 17:39:59 -0000 Changed milestone "Draft Adoption - Best Practices for end-to-end SRTP", resolved as "Done". Changed milestone "Draft Adoption - Best Practices for Opportunistic SRTP", resolved as "Done". URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/sipbrandy/about/