Subject: [sipcore] Note on sipcore-rejected and CNAM

From: Eric Burger <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 20:13:18 -0400

If anyone is wondering, there is ABSOLUTELY NO RELATIONSHIP between the mechanism in sipcore-rejected and anything I can think of relating to caller name presentation (a.k.a. CNAM).  Those IMHO are two entirely different beasts. The former relates with how to find an entity that blocked a session invitation. I.e., it contains addressing information. The later relates with how to present a human-comprehendible string representing the identity of the caller. That is a totally different beast.