From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Mon Sep 17 20:27:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EA021E80A7 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:27:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.355 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.355 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.245, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o8HqkgYhqGDp for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:27:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B02221E80A0 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:27:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 261FDB1E004; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:24:27 -0700 (PDT) To: jimsch@exmsft.com, rhousley@rsasecurity.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, turners@ieca.com, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, blaker@gmail.com From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20120918032427.261FDB1E004@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Cc: dlitz@dlitz.net, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, smime@ietf.org Subject: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358) X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 03:27:57 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3394, "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3394&eid=3358 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Dwayne Litzenberger Section: 2.2.1 Original Text ------------- 3) Output the results. Set C[0] = A[t] For i = 1 to n C[i] = R[t][i] Corrected Text -------------- 3) Output the results. Set C[0] = A[t] For i = 1 to n C[i] = R[s][i], where s = 6n Notes ----- Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC3394 (draft-ietf-smime-aes-keywrap-00) -------------------------------------- Title : Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm Publication Date : September 2002 Author(s) : J. Schaad, R. Housley Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : S/MIME Mail Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From jimsch@augustcellars.com Wed Sep 19 08:42:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A7C21F856C for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:42:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5nobXzTP5p08 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:42:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.pacifier.net (smtp1.pacifier.net [64.255.237.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F3E21F850C for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Tobias (50-39-234-129.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.234.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schaad@nwlink.com) by smtp1.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94A7C2CA27; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:42:55 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Schaad" To: , , , , References: <20120918032427.261FDB1E004@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20120918032427.261FDB1E004@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:41:31 -0700 Message-ID: <00c301cd967d$3e6c0f40$bb442dc0$@augustcellars.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGg2KVXljLfnjMqfy4E0I8zi8LnV5frSLww Content-Language: en-us Cc: dlitz@dlitz.net, smime@ietf.org Subject: Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358) X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:42:57 -0000 As it stands I would say that this errata needs to be rejected. I accept the basic premise of the errata, that when you start step 3 the value of t might not be well defined, however 1. the value of s is well defined and therefore does not need to be redefined, and 2. the value of t needs to be replaced with s in both locations that it occurs. Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 8:24 PM > To: jimsch@exmsft.com; rhousley@rsasecurity.com; > stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie; turners@ieca.com; paul.hoffman@vpnc.org; > blaker@gmail.com > Cc: dlitz@dlitz.net; smime@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358) > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3394, > "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3394&eid=3358 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Dwayne Litzenberger > > Section: 2.2.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > 3) Output the results. > > Set C[0] = A[t] > For i = 1 to n > C[i] = R[t][i] > > Corrected Text > -------------- > 3) Output the results. > > Set C[0] = A[t] > For i = 1 to n > C[i] = R[s][i], where s = 6n > > Notes > ----- > > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC3394 (draft-ietf-smime-aes-keywrap-00) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm > Publication Date : September 2002 > Author(s) : J. Schaad, R. Housley > Category : INFORMATIONAL > Source : S/MIME Mail Security > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org Wed Sep 19 11:11:04 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305C721F8694 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:11:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZgxFlHCmqyI for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E3021F867C for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [165.227.249.211] (sn81.proper.com [75.101.18.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8JIAn8b053145 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:10:49 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\)) From: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: <00c301cd967d$3e6c0f40$bb442dc0$@augustcellars.com> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:10:49 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1A87E9C0-0C35-4B41-BD44-49482CE61961@vpnc.org> References: <20120918032427.261FDB1E004@rfc-editor.org> <00c301cd967d$3e6c0f40$bb442dc0$@augustcellars.com> To: "Jim Schaad" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1486) Cc: dlitz@dlitz.net, smime@ietf.org, rhousley@rsasecurity.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Subject: Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358) X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:11:04 -0000 On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:41 AM, "Jim Schaad" wrote: > As it stands I would say that this errata needs to be rejected. > > > I accept the basic premise of the errata, that when you start step 3 the > value of t might not be well defined, however > > 1. the value of s is well defined and therefore does not need to be > redefined, and > 2. the value of t needs to be replaced with s in both locations that it > occurs. So, you have an alternate errata to propose? --Paul Hoffman From jimsch@augustcellars.com Wed Sep 19 20:31:20 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFCB21F8503 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:31:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LN-ZvIPfLv-n for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp4.pacifier.net (smtp4.pacifier.net [64.255.237.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6C521F8501 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Tobias (50-39-234-129.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.234.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schaad@nwlink.com) by smtp4.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B7D138F05; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:31:18 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Schaad" To: "'Paul Hoffman'" References: <20120918032427.261FDB1E004@rfc-editor.org> <00c301cd967d$3e6c0f40$bb442dc0$@augustcellars.com> <1A87E9C0-0C35-4B41-BD44-49482CE61961@vpnc.org> In-Reply-To: <1A87E9C0-0C35-4B41-BD44-49482CE61961@vpnc.org> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:29:47 -0700 Message-ID: <012a01cd96e0$34c37d80$9e4a7880$@augustcellars.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGg2KVXljLfnjMqfy4E0I8zi8LnVwIl8w5YAcw62nOXzH2OgA== Content-Language: en-us Cc: dlitz@dlitz.net, smime@ietf.org, rhousley@rsasecurity.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Subject: Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358) X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:31:20 -0000 I would make it Corrected Text -------------- 3) Output the results. Set C[0] = A[s] For i = 1 to n C[i] = R[s][i] > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:paul.hoffman@vpnc.org] > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:11 AM > To: Jim Schaad > Cc: rhousley@rsasecurity.com; stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie; turners@ieca.com; > blaker@gmail.com; dlitz@dlitz.net; smime@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358) > > On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:41 AM, "Jim Schaad" > wrote: > > > As it stands I would say that this errata needs to be rejected. > > > > > > I accept the basic premise of the errata, that when you start step 3 > > the value of t might not be well defined, however > > > > 1. the value of s is well defined and therefore does not need to be > > redefined, and 2. the value of t needs to be replaced with s in both > > locations that it occurs. > > So, you have an alternate errata to propose? > > --Paul Hoffman From dlitz@dlitz.net Wed Sep 19 23:25:46 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664C521F8686 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:25:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V+36+86PKgwQ for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from goedel.dlitz.net (goedel.dlitz.net [64.5.53.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C3E21F8683 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by goedel.dlitz.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7C5467E061; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 02:25:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:25:45 -0700 From: Dwayne Litzenberger To: Jim Schaad Message-ID: <20120920062545.GA17535@goedel.dlitz.net> References: <20120918032427.261FDB1E004@rfc-editor.org> <00c301cd967d$3e6c0f40$bb442dc0$@augustcellars.com> <1A87E9C0-0C35-4B41-BD44-49482CE61961@vpnc.org> <012a01cd96e0$34c37d80$9e4a7880$@augustcellars.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <012a01cd96e0$34c37d80$9e4a7880$@augustcellars.com> X-Homepage: https://www.dlitz.net/ X-OpenPGP: url=https://www.dlitz.net/go/gpgkey/; id=19E11FE8B3CFF273ED174A24928CEC1339C25CF7; preference=signencrypt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:41:17 -0700 Cc: smime@ietf.org, rhousley@rsasecurity.com, 'Paul Hoffman' , stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie Subject: Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358) X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:25:46 -0000 Oh, good catch. I saw R[t] but missed A[t]. Sorry about that. On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:29:47PM -0700, Jim Schaad wrote: >I would make it > >Corrected Text >-------------- > 3) Output the results. > > Set C[0] = A[s] > For i = 1 to n > C[i] = R[s][i] > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:paul.hoffman@vpnc.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:11 AM >> To: Jim Schaad >> Cc: rhousley@rsasecurity.com; stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie; turners@ieca.com; >> blaker@gmail.com; dlitz@dlitz.net; smime@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358) >> >> On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:41 AM, "Jim Schaad" >> wrote: >> >> > As it stands I would say that this errata needs to be rejected. >> > >> > >> > I accept the basic premise of the errata, that when you start step 3 >> > the value of t might not be well defined, however >> > >> > 1. the value of s is well defined and therefore does not need to be >> > redefined, and 2. the value of t needs to be replaced with s in both >> > locations that it occurs. >> >> So, you have an alternate errata to propose? >> >> --Paul Hoffman > -- Dwayne C. Litzenberger OpenPGP: 19E1 1FE8 B3CF F273 ED17 4A24 928C EC13 39C2 5CF7 From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Thu Sep 20 09:53:59 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D3F21F87EA for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:53:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.324 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.324 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.276, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lAO9M2kr+hFq for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:53:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBDE21F8750 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:53:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 76448B1E002; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:50:13 -0700 (PDT) To: jimsch@exmsft.com, rhousley@rsasecurity.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, turners@ieca.com, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, blaker@gmail.com From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20120920165013.76448B1E002@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:50:13 -0700 (PDT) Cc: dlitz@dlitz.net, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, smime@ietf.org Subject: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3361) X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:54:00 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3394, "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3394&eid=3361 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Dwayne Litzenberger Section: 2.2.1 Original Text ------------- 3) Output the results. Set C[0] = A[t] For i = 1 to n C[i] = R[t][i] Corrected Text -------------- 3) Output the results. Set C[0] = A[s] For i = 1 to n C[i] = R[s][i] Notes ----- Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC3394 (draft-ietf-smime-aes-keywrap-00) -------------------------------------- Title : Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm Publication Date : September 2002 Author(s) : J. Schaad, R. Housley Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : S/MIME Mail Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From jimsch@augustcellars.com Thu Sep 20 12:46:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C98221F86AB for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:46:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aAwzkNe6pR-7 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp3.pacifier.net (smtp3.pacifier.net [64.255.237.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC8621F86A7 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:45:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Tobias (173-8-216-38-Oregon.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.216.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schaad@nwlink.com) by smtp3.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AFFA38F0E; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:45:58 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jim Schaad" To: "'RFC Errata System'" , , , , , References: <20120920165013.76448B1E002@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20120920165013.76448B1E002@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:44:35 -0700 Message-ID: <017701cd9768$5d8ee050$18aca0f0$@augustcellars.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQKXMjR03f84UmZ0vCCwKMW4/mxNRJYAbCMw Content-Language: en-us Cc: dlitz@dlitz.net, smime@ietf.org Subject: Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3361) X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:46:01 -0000 I am ok with this errata, I think that Russ should make an opinion as well. Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:50 AM > To: jimsch@exmsft.com; rhousley@rsasecurity.com; > stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie; turners@ieca.com; paul.hoffman@vpnc.org; > blaker@gmail.com > Cc: dlitz@dlitz.net; smime@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3361) > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3394, "Advanced > Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3394&eid=3361 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Dwayne Litzenberger > > Section: 2.2.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > 3) Output the results. > > Set C[0] = A[t] > For i = 1 to n > C[i] = R[t][i] > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > 3) Output the results. > > Set C[0] = A[s] > For i = 1 to n > C[i] = R[s][i] > > > Notes > ----- > > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply > All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is > reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit > the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC3394 (draft-ietf-smime-aes-keywrap-00) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm > Publication Date : September 2002 > Author(s) : J. Schaad, R. Housley > Category : INFORMATIONAL > Source : S/MIME Mail Security > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG