From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Fri Jan 10 15:27:19 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB81B1AD190 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:27:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.44 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gzrjV8_2u7XS for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:27:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2607:f170:8000:1500::d3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131741ACC88 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:27:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 192777FC158; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:27:06 -0800 (PST) To: khopri@kisa.or.kr, sjlee@kisa.or.kr, jykim@kisa.or.kr, jilee@kisa.or.kr, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, turners@ieca.com, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, blaker@gmail.com From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20140110232706.192777FC158@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:27:06 -0800 (PST) Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, smime@ietf.org Subject: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4010 (3865) X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:27:20 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4010, "Use of the SEED Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4010&eid=3865 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Russ Housley Section: Appendix A. Original Text ------------- SeedEncryptionAlgorithmInCMS { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9) smime(16) modules(0) id-mod-cms-seed(24) } Corrected Text -------------- SeedEncryptionAlgorithmInCMS { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9) smime(16) modules(0) id-mod-cms-seed(25) } Notes ----- The value assigned for id-mod-cms-seed in 25, not 24. This error will not impact interoperability, but it could impact developers using some ASN.1 tools. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC4010 (draft-ietf-smime-cms-seed-02) -------------------------------------- Title : Use of the SEED Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Publication Date : February 2005 Author(s) : J. Park, S. Lee, J. Kim, J. Lee Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : S/MIME Mail Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Sun Jan 12 14:29:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F851A1F56; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:29:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.44 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4f8ePMPDW3cU; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:29:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2607:f170:8000:1500::d3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FB21A1F3F; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:29:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1539C7FC175; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:29:40 -0800 (PST) To: housley@vigilsec.com, khopri@kisa.or.kr, sjlee@kisa.or.kr, jykim@kisa.or.kr, jilee@kisa.or.kr From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20140112222940.1539C7FC175@rfc-editor.org> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:29:40 -0800 (PST) Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, smime@ietf.org Subject: [smime] [Errata Verified] RFC4010 (3865) X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:29:53 -0000 The following errata report has been verified for RFC4010, "Use of the SEED Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4010&eid=3865 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Russ Housley Date Reported: 2014-01-10 Verified by: Sean Turner (IESG) Section: Appendix A. Original Text ------------- SeedEncryptionAlgorithmInCMS { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9) smime(16) modules(0) id-mod-cms-seed(24) } Corrected Text -------------- SeedEncryptionAlgorithmInCMS { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9) smime(16) modules(0) id-mod-cms-seed(25) } Notes ----- The value assigned for id-mod-cms-seed in 25, not 24. This error will not impact interoperability, but it could impact developers using some ASN.1 tools. -------------------------------------- RFC4010 (draft-ietf-smime-cms-seed-02) -------------------------------------- Title : Use of the SEED Encryption Algorithm in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Publication Date : February 2005 Author(s) : J. Park, S. Lee, J. Kim, J. Lee Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : S/MIME Mail Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From alexey.melnikov@isode.com Wed Jan 15 06:07:12 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970761AE0D7 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 06:07:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.539 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6KESfIwleud7 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 06:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6691AE37C for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 06:07:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1389794818; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=dvL8YWtysw4MXk92s8af3F9AxxGcYoe2xmI2UgzhPQQ=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=R70MMfzPhIQuOt6qw2zP/H6HCy2lXmJCN2rrUcJw3SrapsFXOBTAVCR1DU9o/mVgYbfoD2 wzMadYd8ws+p1PXHHWCP8M/9mu5vgyM5CTPjUB/XSk9RX55HXa8RDqbengKSdBHU8UtSCY OgaDkJ4CH9Svuqjhbh5DZ2hgsflTeuI=; Received: from [172.16.1.29] (richard.isode.com [62.3.217.249]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id ; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:06:58 +0000 Message-ID: <52D69605.7010809@isode.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:07:01 +0000 From: Alexey Melnikov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 To: smime@ietf.org References: <20140114193639.17836.64885.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20140114193639.17836.64885.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20140114193639.17836.64885.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [smime] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-melnikov-smime-msa-to-mda-02.txt X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:07:12 -0000 Hi, I've posted a new version of the document describing how MSA/MTA can sign/encrypt messages with S/MIME. This is effectively an update to Experimental RFC 3183. Changes from RFC 3183 are: 1) The draft only includes domain signatures from RFC 3183 (i.e. Additional Attributes Signatures and Review Signatures are not mentioned). 2) Naming conventions for X.509 certificates were simplified. Unlike RFC 3183, subject names of domain signing/encrypting X.509 certificates don't have to have a specific form. But Subject Alternative Names need to include URIs for domain being protected. 3) Incorporated erratum 3757 resolution. 4) Updated references and some minor editorial corrections. I would be happy to hear comments/see reviews of the draft. Thank you, Alexey -------- Original Message -------- Subject: I-D Action: draft-melnikov-smime-msa-to-mda-02.txt Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:36:39 -0800 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : MSA and MTA S/MIME signing & encryption Authors : William Ottaway Alexey Melnikov Filename : draft-melnikov-smime-msa-to-mda-02.txt Pages : 20 Date : 2014-01-14 Abstract: This document specifies how S/MIME signing and encryption can be applied between a Message Submission Agent (MSA) and a Message Delivery Agent (MDA) or between 2 Message Transfer Agents (MTA). The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-melnikov-smime-msa-to-mda/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-melnikov-smime-msa-to-mda-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-melnikov-smime-msa-to-mda-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Thu Jan 16 00:49:26 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC95B1ADFE5 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:49:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.44 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mzZhxmwZaS2b for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:49:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2607:f170:8000:1500::d3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B511A8032 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:49:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6E1067FC39A; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:49:13 -0800 (PST) To: housley@vigilsec.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, turners@ieca.com, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, blaker@gmail.com From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20140116084913.6E1067FC39A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 00:49:13 -0800 (PST) Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, smime@ietf.org, jos.breek@ul.com Subject: [smime] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5652 (3867) X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:49:26 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5652, "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5652&eid=3867 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Jos Breek Section: 5.3 Original Text ------------- digestAlgorithm identifies the message digest algorithm, and any associated parameters, used by the signer. Corrected Text -------------- digestAlgorithm identifies the message digest algorithm, and any associated parameters, used by the signer in the signature Generation Process. The message digest algorithm shall be equal to the message digest algorithm used in the signatureAlgorithm field. Notes ----- The text stated that the message digest algorithm is "used by the signer". It is unclear for what purpose the message digest algorithm is used. There are implementations that use the message digest algorithm specified in the messageDigest field instead of the message digest algorithm specified in the signatureAlgorithm. Is the purpose of the messageDigest field to nest the hashing algorithm used in the signing process? If so, please use the corrected text to clarify the goal of the field. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5652 (draft-ietf-smime-rfc3852bis-00) -------------------------------------- Title : Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Publication Date : September 2009 Author(s) : R. Housley Category : DRAFT STANDARD Source : S/MIME Mail Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From housley@vigilsec.com Wed Jan 29 13:57:57 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9691A041A for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:57:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M8OxDD6PwjKs for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:57:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [209.135.209.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABE01A03FF for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:57:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1BF9A42C4 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:57:42 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vm6UWbimbx8h for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:57:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.2.110] (pool-71-178-10-80.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.178.10.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1269A42B4 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:57:21 -0500 (EST) From: Russ Housley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:57:10 -0500 References: <20140129215021.F1FF27FC39B@rfc-editor.org> To: IETF SMIME Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Subject: [smime] Fwd: RFC 7114 on Creation of a Registry for smime-type Parameter Values X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:57:58 -0000 Begin forwarded message: > From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Date: January 29, 2014 4:50:21 PM EST > To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org > Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > Subject: RFC 7114 on Creation of a Registry for smime-type Parameter = Values > Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org >=20 > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. >=20 >=20 > RFC 7114 >=20 > Title: Creation of a Registry for=20 > smime-type Parameter Values=20 > Author: B. Leiba > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: January 2014 > Mailbox: barryleiba@computer.org > Pages: 4 > Characters: 7176 > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None >=20 > I-D Tag: draft-leiba-smime-type-registry-02.txt >=20 > URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7114.txt >=20 > Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) defined the > Content-Type parameter "smime-type". As the list of defined values > for that parameter has increased, it has become clear that a registry > is needed to document these values. This document creates the > registry, registers the current values, and specifies the policies > for registration of new values. >=20 > This is now a Proposed Standard. >=20 > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track > protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and = suggestions > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet > Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and > status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. >=20 > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist >=20 > For searching the RFC series, see = http://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_search.php > For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html >=20 > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. = Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. >=20 >=20 > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC