From nobody Wed Mar 8 09:15:21 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB75E129513; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:15:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hiPoaXNiRWGe; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:15:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf0-x243.google.com (mail-lf0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EDC3129440; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:15:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-x243.google.com with SMTP id r36so2844569lfi.0; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 09:15:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YgTVRvDk4KCvriQhbQzeIKV43AsSMsLMIz5DoE996cw=; b=KKgbGdIuRSE0oki80WD11E6DP1F5PtZm/GB/Of5Gh3ILZjf8PhSGqmBosik0TGWj11 ojHvDXoXL+lp1Q/ZG7rtmc8NXxroh+Sah80GtlyTRBVwsfnksjD5fu3HySoP/1v1H6Yd NynoXuHWDhEUiTztfMxJu8hcJAQ5NvEPDUtbit8HLX2lz3QSgvTwcY5CNhB93ba2sWHU bqmLRu+U6xSc7UqBr9pkwW/m71Mfl/kc9z1slmLMxP1njPubmlzfKl5qVdF6KuDXo7Sf 6UMvBCyuUgz2d9C9s6AjK9S0OUIZQlMB079IuCy7+ECbUNxS1YqkiE1d7nRSHfA+6AGG zybw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YgTVRvDk4KCvriQhbQzeIKV43AsSMsLMIz5DoE996cw=; b=VFsOgEUAcfC5blZLfAf8Ob6CQ71O1yv38fTwMRE7Uoku33X2cD/z2gnN/5amKj4DoZ crfD4k8nvNt+sZyR/eUQuquSSKKvlFeA24RjqUoNNiRHjax9F1yGHwIMSlH23Wx37PTL yqvtPoYSl3/7bDPq87F8jpHQi+hjWDWyTyWRIc9lmPmMFy5icHB4THngMNQ3/krqG7Jx jqUL/tdOFAFtcuqeVTmB6mZuj8yhGy76HH8A3pJUzdykx9pA3qwy/ZJReLtjIiy1TfVy JRU17MzE+NFf8a3NgsMBnwR5pN+50m9DZfKs1u7iomotSi8WLb+e6PcKBahuVkhB339L YmTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39maKmhTbGvAgte2y1QtQNAc8wsXEOaEo6D/QHRUk328tHzHUS5kRPWma/RCI+SOHA== X-Received: by 10.25.43.8 with SMTP id r8mr1778689lfr.41.1488993313026; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 09:15:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.6] (109241207033.gdansk.vectranet.pl. [109.241.207.33]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h62sm720104lfh.62.2017.03.08.09.15.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Mar 2017 09:15:12 -0800 (PST) To: Ian Farrer References: <305F0B31-467B-4138-882D-8617764499A8@gmx.com> From: Tomek Mrugalski Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:15:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <305F0B31-467B-4138-882D-8617764499A8@gmx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: Softwires-wg , dhcwg , draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Softwires] Adoption call for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 - Respond by Mar 8th, 2017 X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 17:15:16 -0000 With my dhc chair hat off, I support adoption of this draft in dhc. Tomek From nobody Thu Mar 9 00:23:56 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietf.org Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4246129448; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 00:23:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.47.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <148904783472.5786.17027054799666612762@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:23:54 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: softwires@ietf.org Subject: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-10.txt X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 08:23:55 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Softwires of the IETF. Title : RADIUS Attribute for Softwire Address plus Port based Mechanisms Authors : Sheng Jiang Yu Fu Bing Liu Peter Deacon Chongfeng Xie Tianxiang Li Filename : draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-10.txt Pages : 21 Date : 2017-03-09 Abstract: IPv4-over-IPv6 transition mechanisms provide both IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity services simultaneously during the IPv4/IPv6 co-existing period. The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) options have been defined to configure Customer Edge (CE) in MAP-E, MAP-T, and Lightweight 4over6. However, in many networks, the configuration information may be stored in the Authentication Authorization and Accounting (AAA) servers, while user configuration is mainly provided by the Broadband Network Gateway (BNG) through the DHCPv6 protocol. This document defines a Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) attribute that carries CE configuration information from the AAA server to the BNG. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Thu Mar 9 00:42:51 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36224129412 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 00:42:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8_caFZmPsvOc for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 00:42:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp13.cnnic.cn [218.241.118.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5A9129438 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 00:42:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from LIUXD (unknown [218.241.103.174]) by ocmail02.zx.nicx.cn (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf0A5QLSAFcFYB8uIKg--.4584S3; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:42:40 +0800 (CST) From: "Yu Fu" To: Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:42:58 +0800 Message-ID: <00d401d298b1$28507300$78f15900$@cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdKYroIAr7EBNzczS9mWctoeBW17cgAAJ0jA Content-Language: zh-cn X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf0A5QLSAFcFYB8uIKg--.4584S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7Zw1kWF45trykWFy3ZFW3Awb_yoW5JFW8pa ySva45Gw1xJw1kG3ykWw409wnYv3s5GrWfCFnxGr10v345J3WvyrnYgFW5Aa9rJrWrGr42 vr4Y934UWFs5WrJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUkFb7Iv0xC_Zr1lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Ar0_tr1l84ACjcxK6xII jxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr0_Gr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I 8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI 64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8Jw Am72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lc2xSY4AK67AK6r43MxAIw28I cxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2 IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUJVWUXwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI 42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42 IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_WFyUJVCq3wCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E 87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jcGYLUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: pix13q5fqqxugofq/ Archived-At: Subject: [Softwires] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-10.txt X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 08:42:49 -0000 Hi all, We have updated the new version of draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius. The main changes are: 1) Added an S46 container option for the DHCPv6 advertise message in the 4th step in the Figure 1. 2) Fixed some language typos Your comments are appreciated. Thanks BR Yu -----Original Message----- From: softwires-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 4:24 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: softwires@ietf.org Subject: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-10.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Softwires of the IETF. Title : RADIUS Attribute for Softwire Address plus Port based Mechanisms Authors : Sheng Jiang Yu Fu Bing Liu Peter Deacon Chongfeng Xie Tianxiang Li Filename : draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-10.txt Pages : 21 Date : 2017-03-09 Abstract: IPv4-over-IPv6 transition mechanisms provide both IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity services simultaneously during the IPv4/IPv6 co-existing period. The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) options have been defined to configure Customer Edge (CE) in MAP-E, MAP-T, and Lightweight 4over6. However, in many networks, the configuration information may be stored in the Authentication Authorization and Accounting (AAA) servers, while user configuration is mainly provided by the Broadband Network Gateway (BNG) through the DHCPv6 protocol. This document defines a Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) attribute that carries CE configuration information from the AAA server to the BNG. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires From nobody Thu Mar 9 02:08:50 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A0E1293E4 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 02:08:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=jordi.palet@consulintel.es header.d=consulintel.es Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qLk55j57ewN1 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 02:08:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [217.126.185.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0C1F12711D for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 02:08:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1489054055; x=1489658855; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:User-Agent:Date:Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID: Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Reply-To; bh=7xMkTuVdQTSm8iOZpSYiGhF34 OcHcdWCklqICLyIEHk=; b=p0VPw20PbrD6YZJIIsN6GxkhyiCKr2nt4WUdB6nGN Y0kSFOUEviYrG2GwG4/8z1p/Ra2oWuJZIGIqOOKrkI+qimstSdNgFMRxQtdGzSBx ATBeQe89nm5eI2JJMHQ5NcwoS2fywv3n+OUqRSa30TSn5xqP8wXMm8a0C2jO9utz KA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=DY9FtXklbs6nA+NZBiMW1HXgWuo+JGnEaC4aUieEZzMl4IQnxUkgCOBVFJzY Xns6tjOdmU6Qd03oFb2YMyLB6TM5sTbbeHanSsmvHk8dKdfTai3eKDlPa fjDIk82FQTD3Nqjdk/E2H0TbYTWQrHRFMeKWYRTSUpFqVcqwbaZQkk=; X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:07:35 +0100 X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:07:20 +0100 Received: from [10.10.10.99] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v11.0.3) with ESMTP id md50005381007.msg for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:07:10 +0100 X-MDOP-RefID: re=0.000,fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0) X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es X-HashCash: 1:20:170309:md50005381007::NUSdsWcm3sUI+BVf:00003OjK X-Return-Path: prvs=12416e7968=jordi.palet@consulintel.es X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: softwires@ietf.org User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216 Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:07:08 +0100 From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ To: , Ian Farrer Message-ID: <10E18CD5-9A60-4BAF-ADD2-88231D516B35@consulintel.es> Thread-Topic: [Softwires] Adoption call for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 - Respond by Mar 8th, 2017 References: <305F0B31-467B-4138-882D-8617764499A8@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Cc: Softwires-wg , dhcwg , draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Softwires] Adoption call for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 - Respond by Mar 8th, 2017 X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:08:48 -0000 +1 Saludos, Jordi =20 -----Mensaje original----- De: Softwires en nombre de Tomek Mrugalski Responder a: Fecha: mi=C3=A9rcoles, 8 de marzo de 2017, 18:15 Para: Ian Farrer CC: Softwires-wg , dhcwg , Asunto: Re: [Softwires] Adoption call for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-= opt-07 - Respond by Mar 8th, 2017 With my dhc chair hat off, I support adoption of this draft in dhc. =20 Tomek =20 _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires =20 =20 ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.consulintel.es The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or con= fidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(= s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any dis= closure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, = including attached files, is prohibited. From nobody Thu Mar 9 05:15:12 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B646C1295E2; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 05:15:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xNjrPkeeKQZk; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 05:15:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E4CB1295BD; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 05:15:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1603; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1489065306; x=1490274906; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=dqz3P8NpkJ2WAhtj6GYThkluTzUDU9wBMqb+w3OdHIM=; b=eTIttB5p+xZ4BgIAPUtHmbkqZLm8Zo4IABsGUBmwoih0DwgEVAb41VqB d3hemn2NAGW+6ieieq6MhKHpwe3nnAGmLEpsj7Vg+O+HwWqLJaSZKxDXt gAwFTWnF4pi+A0OWGs8AtPUZ7827jxZFdoSkGAPyUO9tKqnrgQ/w6Y6Td o=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ATAQC5VMFY/5hdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1FhgQoHjWWRTpU4gg4fC4V0AgICgi0/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRU?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAwEBGwoTMQMLDAQCAQgRAwEBAR8JBycLFAkIAgQOBQiJeA6yGjqKcAEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2LPYE8iH0FnDkBhnWLOYIEU4RQigKTPgEfOD5?= =?us-ascii?q?FVhUYJ4UKgUp1iR6BDQEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,268,1486425600"; d="scan'208";a="395508825" Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2017 13:15:05 +0000 Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v29DF5fT031754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:15:05 GMT Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:15:04 -0600 Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:15:04 -0600 From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" To: dhcwg Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Adoption call for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 - Respond by Mar 8th, 2017 Thread-Index: AQHSjTJgTzD0DDvvFUWkJqPj+VlWC6GMkyHg Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:15:04 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.86.241.9] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: Softwires-wg , "draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Softwires] [dhcwg] Adoption call for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 - Respond by Mar 8th, 2017 X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:15:08 -0000 Hi: The DHC WG will adopt this document. There was good support for it, and no = one opposed the adoption. The authors are requested to published the DHC WG -00 version of the draft = (with the minor fix to reference the correct RFC (RFC7568 -> RFC7598) as po= inted out by Jordi. - Tomek & Bernie -----Original Message----- From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tomek Mrugalski Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 12:38 PM To: dhcwg Cc: Softwires-wg ; draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt= @ietf.org Subject: [dhcwg] Adoption call for draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 = - Respond by Mar 8th, 2017 Hi, This message initiates a two weeks long DHC WG adoption call on: Title: DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 Source Address Option Pages: 9 Date: 2017-02-01 Document: draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 Link: tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 This document initially started as work intended to be adopted in Softwires= , but after a discussion with chairs, responsible AD (Suresh) and presentin= g this work in DHC, the conclusion is to aim for DHC adoption, not Softwire= s. Therefore this is a DHC adoption call. This message is cross-posted to Softwires to let Softwire experts weigh in = their opinion. Please be sure to post your comments to DHC list, though. Co= mments sent by end of March 8th, 2017 are much appreciated. Bernie & Tomek _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg From nobody Thu Mar 9 08:21:39 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0DF1296AA for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:21:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91A83LFC4C95 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:21:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14BAE1296A7 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:21:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ians-mbp.lan ([80.159.248.112]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MYg42-1ciHko3fOM-00VQWn for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 17:21:28 +0100 From: Ian Farrer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <98B15EAF-CE9D-4977-B492-0CA96C872F00@gmx.com> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 17:21:54 +0100 To: Softwires-wg Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:/7oZuAm3GuHHS0oS8dFCv8pc6+Ziyfj9MjsDSH9eS5G+WQIAnqX qGuTbTlScbNVC/y+lTyAIumWtdNcxhikJCaHIeOHjmmhoC7zc9Gb5uyJhUi+5lrS0HxhxLa ZqgpPxcLuiZzjNydEt3TPISd8xhv5RHc5wr0DeOTSMfG18ZhT/QMnG/dn6hK9dye/hOJoQ/ T7dV3EP22yicdfp3wMOeQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:b3jIrA1wWVI=:2e7Vj/rZ92qZwH3mxmLLYc BT3TGqnUScNuotMVEXKQ5NpJgSPzbfvM8HCqwy7QSb5yxLUEoSksWARz1OA0mFsa0fJ04OIiS mAVlZrl0jotEhLCXDs/Wu5/ZbtweYhLOas0mnjFvqBWaaHWcAuw3W1zvJyz2AHud7GAnCJkOl 3a1vWQ5fT/b6tMNhKISNB7trlKPJEHlrUp0MBRxz2z2O5hgcz+nFD/uaxnJ+GD1ZC3a7BUh9t Sg1zfo1KqFWdsAhno7m4k9aaw4/058h61v6HnCNG4uioJmztFuE3uhQ8V9AxvSGoa2VecOMH7 PxnjJWRQJZP1QA3pN/5erQtC+Gmxb9VrxqaWTS9x9DffIpLC9EVjJ8nEn9ENNM29NP6zx51QP mOlZ1ce92W82juYidnuZE8Zataa4cnPvWi98i7VNR/m7eCe7rQD0QHRzhUhDDy6RxtpQmcfH+ RAG1TktFreD0xFOfMtmUYHA7RgIj1TEpbT1fc6amzAdCBhVs4rRcjzmVceeUB4VnX0KfXJ5Fd wC2DHTKr4xj6Ia9BBheBERsN+p52PXTIgovcQCvTxZJzHmoIUo50nq021q6hs+q+PIIEw/5IV TYjSJA3IJCOOJFg1APwwsf267ijHjOJUaX3cvt7BYYNhS7Nfci/+inY1ObA4TVMqVyJ1TZ+YI Qee0bV3T7C3nu9VvTwB2zSnmIO5PEpHvyCZRe9+U3XDXSMKGMcUq30jIxMfThDGxz0Q3hWg9X CNcmAJHsuntI1rBCPpAhU6bP1fJtvWzHcPMX0AJGeV8aVGPcz9iRXoy/0ZmVVdaDIhbag0N0P lKbrBIA Archived-At: Subject: [Softwires] WGLC For draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast - Please respond by 23rd March X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:21:35 -0000 Hi, The authors of draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-15 believe this = document is ready for advancement. We would like to issue a two week = working group last call finishing on 23rd March. Please send any substantive comments to the list and express your = opinion on whether this draft is ready for publication. You are also = welcome to send your editorial comments directly to the authors. Thanks, Yong & Ian From nobody Fri Mar 10 18:21:45 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B1C129529; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:21:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.767 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.767 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449, RCVD_IN_XBL=0.375, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_FAIL=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q6qyWGuz6I0Z; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:21:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from tsqt.pisem.net (unknown [109.94.43.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3861294A3; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:21:06 -0800 (PST) From: "ops-area@ietf.org" To: "ops-area-bounces" , "sidr-chairs" , "softwires" , "draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements" , "nerds" , "IETF Secretariat" , "draft-ietf-sfc-nsh" Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:20:51 +0700 Message-ID: <1230722388.20170311052051@queuefull.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0021_010F943B.2BD5B36A" Content-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [Softwires] =?utf-8?q?it=27s_worth_reading?= X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 02:21:21 -0000 ------=_NextPart_000_0021_010F943B.2BD5B36A Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGV5LCANCg0KTG9vayB3aGF0IEkndmUgZ290IGZvciB5b3UsIEkgZ3Vlc3MgaXQncyB3b3J0aCBy ZWFkaW5nLCBtb3JlIGluZm8gaGVyZSBodHRwOi8vZGVhbC53b3dqdWNoYW5nLmNvbS9hN2E2DQoN ClNlbnQgZnJvbSBteSBpUGhvbmUsIG9wcy1hcmVhQGlldGYub3JnDQoNCg== ------=_NextPart_000_0021_010F943B.2BD5B36A Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey,

 

L= ook what I've got for you, I guess it's worth reading, more info here = message

 

Sent from my iPhone, ops-= area@ietf.org

------=_NextPart_000_0021_010F943B.2BD5B36A-- From nobody Sat Mar 11 06:17:36 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DAE129461; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:17:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ywROH0YT8xb0; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:17:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62C42129458; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:17:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ians-mbp.fritz.box ([81.173.160.239]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MPm54-1crfds2OBO-004zgn; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 15:17:26 +0100 From: Ian Farrer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 15:17:57 +0100 Message-Id: To: Softwires-wg Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:vk3gQmA5oub3IKKASwVwyhWKtLoSfydAa3m2W/HQo57wfuaxtND CQ8vtj7sQUmAFyQiyHxzF1QmoF4V2PsU16eHDaXcEvpyezrrXtf3P1ADFe8J5xW1CdrCQ2A 3+b679QO4Kyr88Bo1NcaIMoeXJq6FK9GlBby/HjxHixOFp0ngl7H25kqPAEriS1V8M9DFHn RhuViAayiFm9r+anfK9qg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:4LJgpj+1/Pc=:8+rg59+VdhGyzr44M1JgXw LClQ2vEG+JeaOgIPQeRTXc6ZV7PUAiqVrH243BnkBIu+/ZtjIs8uC9T45rjEkSQXxmOup9obJ XH6o71mk2VsSRf/r6cUyMCMqDOF0uecHKqh+V2Pr5jnkpB5igeg4GOqmE3eiskQe9nWDW1XnY PCkTaEglwFJuDBRfev/SVga68266i6Auqh3DMwn4hk+7BYWOpEjdD7kMS43bLsp77Qs5AsR4t iFxIUQsrYoTBpev18tdS1EvqEP6gKxtJQQK2JW0RebWgBu/LHQB9zfE1DqmqEwF+NWnn8ygAO XcJhxdfXnnbBo5Xqi0hu8kOmjrCpeGe3kL+WUvlPUL52bH9/mlGgwzpLr1S65gysDnf/nPlwX g2QYlG1i1sUbIkTfyPeUKrj23JWP3f1BUb/RwHGFYM2VnUr99VF6p/AUVtECB48+CUfuon92C RgwIku9JQVOaeHvitKjjpsvLhwWtBfyitA/CaHb0P2gTUF5ODjwZGJQvdJuYvGgzX9hIMiL4z 68j50eyvPZTpXb0g6TS3sek0SolnyKOl+ZAsxaLOu1qby8PgGFxfafewjpvieAPc9cK/JWZ3Y 5mqeq8sr83acGTnn0EfpXxgl7X0Flwu169RipHocrJTmuPQ1JZ36wzWo8dtucIab1FwTH5wer BURsSOYAc2OT09TUrpIOmHtOrmfBydz3nwdY7CYBWcOjKWmWa88FBHkASL1/yd+r64UPtOsiO PdS4BZ2yBamYDvK8FQT0k03yJLhdTf9grdND7msOp+m1ni+hbhvIEFvqXfzMExLqqdDVOmQ31 6t7q1CD Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-softwire-yang@ietf.org Subject: [Softwires] draft-ietf-softwire-yang: Strawman Proposal to restructure the CE model X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:17:34 -0000 Hi, The structure of the model currently defined in = draft-ietf-softwire-yang-01 provides a single model for =E2=80=98binding=E2= =80=99 softwires containing BR and CE. We=E2=80=99ve done some work on = implementing these models and whilst the BR model is working, the CE = part is problematic. While there is all of the relevant configuration parameters data for = building a softwire, there is no concept of a softwire interface defined = in the model. This means that there=E2=80=99s no way of configuring the = CEs routing table to add an IPv4 route via the softwire, as ietf-routing = requires an interface to be available in the interfaces list to create a = =E2=80=98simple-next-hop=E2=80=99. Also (to me), this makes the model = incompatible with the wider YANG interfaces and routing structure. =46rom the 2 softwire CE implementations that I am familiar with, in = both cases a tunnel interface is created and this is visible in the = device=E2=80=99s interfaces list. My thinking is that the softwire YANG = model would be a lot easier to implement if it followed this convention. Below is a straw man proposal for a CE specific model which hooks into = the ietf-interfaces structure. it=E2=80=99s not a complete model with = all of the functionality (esp. the state data) there at the moment, but = it shows how the CE=E2=80=99s softwire interface could be modelled, = making it possible to integrate this with ietf-routing. I used the = =E2=80=98tunnel=E2=80=99 iftype as it seemed to be the closest match, = but it may be necessary to define a new =E2=80=98ipip=E2=80=99 type. I=E2=80=99d appreciate any thoughts on whether this is a better way to = approach softwire-yang than we are using at the moment. If so, then it = will mean some restructuring of the models overall. Possibly it would = make sense to have a common module containing the common grouped = functions, a separate model for BR and another for CE (the points I make = above are as valid for an =E2=80=98algorithm=E2=80=99 CE as for a = =E2=80=98binding=E2=80=99 one). Cheers, Ian module ietf-softwire-lwb4 { namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-softwire-lwb4"; prefix "softwire-lwb4"; import ietf-inet-types { prefix inet; } import ietf-interfaces { prefix if; } import iana-if-type { prefix ianaift; } organization "Softwire Working Group"; contact " Qi Sun Hao Wang Yong Cui Ian Sladjana Zoric Mohamed Boucadair Rajiv "; description "This document defines a YANG data model for the configuration = and management of A+P Softwire Border Routers (BRs) and Customer Premises Equipment (CEs). It covers Lightweight 4over6, MAP-E and MAP-T mechanisms. Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXX; see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; revision 2017-11-03 { description "Initial version of standalone lwB4 model"; reference "-00"; } /* * Grouping */ grouping port-set { description "Use the PSID algorithm to represent a range of transport layer ports which will be used by a CE device for NAPT."; leaf psid-offset { type uint8 { range 0..16; } description "The number of offset bits. In Lightweight 4over6, the = default value is 0 for assigning one contiguous port range. In = MAP-E/T, the default value is 6, which excludes system ports by = default and assigns port ranges distribute across the entire port = space. If the this parameter is larger than 0, the value of offset MUST be greater than 0."; } leaf psid-len { type uint8 { range 0..15; } // mandatory true; description "The length of PSID, representing the sharing ratio for an IPv4 address."; } leaf psid { type uint16; // mandatory true; description "Port Set Identifier (PSID) value, which identifies a set of ports algorithmically."; } } grouping binding-entry { description "The lwAFTR maintains an address binding table that contains the binding between the lwB4's IPv6 address, the allocated IPv4 address and restricted port-set."; leaf binding-ipv6info { type union { type inet:ipv6-address; type inet:ipv6-prefix; } // mandatory true; description "The IPv6 information for a binding entry. If this is an IPv6 prefix, it indicates that the IPv6 source address of the lwB4 is constructed according to the description in RFC7596; if it is an IPv6 address, it means the lwB4 uses any /128 address from the assigned IPv6 prefix. "; } leaf binding-ipv4-addr { type inet:ipv4-address; // mandatory true; description "The IPv4 address assigned to the lwB4, which is used as the IPv4 external address for lwB4 local NAPT44."; } container port-set { description "For Lightweight 4over6, the default value of offset should be 0, to configure one contiguous port range."; uses port-set { refine psid-offset { default "0"; } } } leaf br-ipv6-addr { type inet:ipv6-address; // mandatory true; description "The IPv6 address for lwaftr."; } leaf lifetime { type uint32; units seconds; description "The lifetime for the binding entry"; } } // configuration parameters for CE softwire binding interfaces augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" { when "if:type =3D 'ianaift:tunnel'"; description "CE Softwire binding interface configuration"; leaf name { type string; description "Name of the Softwire binding interface"; } leaf enable { type boolean; description "Enable/disable the CE interface."; } leaf type { type identityref { base if:interface-type; } description "The type of the interface. Softwires use type tunnel"; reference "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifType"; } container ce-interface { description "instances for CE"; leaf name { type string; description "The CE's name."; } leaf tunnel-payload-mtu { type uint16; description "The payload MTU for Lightweight 4over6 tunnel."; } leaf tunnel-path-mru { type uint16; description "The path MRU for Lightweight 4over6 tunnel."; } leaf b4-ipv6-addr-format { type boolean; description "The format of lwB4 (CE) IPv6 address. If set to true, it indicates that the IPv6 source address of the lwB4 is constructed according to the description in [RFC7596]; if set to false, the lwB4 (CE) can use any /128 address from the assigned IPv6 prefix."; } uses binding-entry; } } // operational state parameters for CE softwire binding interface augment "/if:interfaces-state/if:interface" { when "if:type =3D 'ianaift:tunnel'"; description "CE Softwire binding interface operational state"; container ce-interface { config false; description "Data nodes for the operational state of interfaces."; leaf name { type string; description "The name of the interface."; reference "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifName"; } leaf type { type identityref { base if:interface-type; } description "The type of the interface."; reference "RFC 2863: The Interfaces Group MIB - ifType"; } } } } From nobody Mon Mar 13 08:02:35 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67AF129459; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:41:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eEXkINgBC8Ar; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:41:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EB951293DA; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:41:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2C8D2B8216C; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:41:58 -0800 (PST) To: ian.farrer@telekom.de, tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com, ot@cisco.com, ian.farrer@telekom.de, sperreault@jive.com, wdec@cisco.com, congxiao@cernet.edu.cn, leaf.y.yeh@hotmail.com, dxhbupt@gmail.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20170301014158.2C8D2B8216C@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 17:41:58 -0800 (PST) Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:02:33 -0700 Cc: text/plain@rfc-editor.org, charset=UTF-8@rfc-editor.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.orgContent-Type, iesg@ietf.org, softwires@ietf.org Subject: [Softwires] [Errata Verified] RFC7598 (4865) X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 01:41:59 -0000 The following errata report has been verified for RFC7598, "DHCPv6 Options for Configuration of Softwire Address and Port-Mapped Clients". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7598&eid=4865 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Ian Farrer Date Reported: 2016-11-15 Verified by: Terry Manderson (IESG) Section: 4.3 Original Text ------------- dmr-prefix6-len: 8 bits long; expresses the bitmask length of the IPv6 prefix specified in the dmr-ipv6-prefix field. Allowed values range from 0 to 128. Corrected Text -------------- dmr-prefix6-len: 8 bits long; expresses the bitmask length of the IPv6 prefix specified in the dmr-ipv6-prefix field. Allowed values range from 0 to 96. Notes ----- This field is used to provision the default mapping rule prefix length, which is defined in section 5.1 of RFC7599: The DMR IPv6 prefix length SHOULD be 64 bits long by default and in any case MUST NOT exceed 96 bits. -------------------------------------- RFC7598 (draft-ietf-softwire-map-dhcp-12) -------------------------------------- Title : DHCPv6 Options for Configuration of Softwire Address and Port-Mapped Clients Publication Date : July 2015 Author(s) : T. Mrugalski, O. Troan, I. Farrer, S. Perreault, W. Dec, C. Bao, L. Yeh, X. Deng Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Softwires Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Thu Mar 16 08:58:16 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5ED12966D for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:58:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.396 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c14iklv8MYxf for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta241.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49A9129646 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from opfedar03.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.5]) by opfedar22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 25A6F602DD; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:58:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.59]) by opfedar03.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 08A2C18006B; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:58:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::ec23:902:c31f:731c%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:58:06 +0100 From: To: Ian Farrer , Softwires-wg Thread-Topic: [Softwires] WGLC For draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast - Please respond by 23rd March Thread-Index: AQHSmPFFcOYEhMu9Pk+NVQgSEM2iI6GXp4gA Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:58:05 +0000 Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E35842@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> References: <98B15EAF-CE9D-4977-B492-0CA96C872F00@gmx.com> In-Reply-To: <98B15EAF-CE9D-4977-B492-0CA96C872F00@gmx.com> Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: fr-FR X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.5] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Softwires] WGLC For draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast - Please respond by 23rd March X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:58:10 -0000 Hi Ian, all, The comments I have about this document are the following: * Instead of (re)specifying the behavior it would be more appropriate to re= fer to draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast (RFC8114) when it makes sense (= e.g., AFBR behavior, address mapping, CP, DP, etc.).=20 * The document says the following: The mPrefix46 for SSM mode is also defined in Section 4.1 of [RFC7371] This is not true. RFC7371 is about flag bits not MPREFIX64.=20 Instead of referring to RFC7371, adding a pointer to Section 5 of draft-iet= f-softwire-dslite-multicast would make sense.=20 Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De=A0: Softwires [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Ian > Farrer > Envoy=E9=A0: jeudi 9 mars 2017 17:22 > =C0=A0: Softwires-wg > Objet=A0: [Softwires] WGLC For draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast - Pleas= e > respond by 23rd March >=20 > Hi, >=20 > The authors of draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-15 believe this documen= t > is ready for advancement. We would like to issue a two week working group > last call finishing on 23rd March. >=20 > Please send any substantive comments to the list and express your opinion > on whether this draft is ready for publication. You are also welcome to > send your editorial comments directly to the authors. >=20 > Thanks, > Yong & Ian >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires From nobody Fri Mar 17 16:11:09 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCD5129659; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LwvP9rH_axFo; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5663A12967E; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8FF5AB80DA1; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:26 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, softwires@ietf.org Message-Id: <20170317231026.8FF5AB80DA1@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [Softwires] RFC 8114 on Delivery of IPv4 Multicast Services to IPv4 Clients over an IPv6 Multicast Network X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 23:11:01 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8114 Title: Delivery of IPv4 Multicast Services to IPv4 Clients over an IPv6 Multicast Network Author: M. Boucadair, C. Qin, C. Jacquenet, Y. Lee, Q. Wang Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, jacni@jacni.com, christian.jacquenet@orange.com, yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com, 13301168516@189.cn Pages: 23 Characters: 47896 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-18.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8114 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8114 This document specifies a solution for the delivery of IPv4 multicast services to IPv4 clients over an IPv6 multicast network. The solution relies upon a stateless IPv4-in-IPv6 encapsulation scheme and uses an IPv6 multicast distribution tree to deliver IPv4 multicast traffic. The solution is particularly useful for the delivery of multicast service offerings to customers serviced by Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite). This document is a product of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Fri Mar 17 16:11:34 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F6E129665; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HdjdqRGuExiS; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:11:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E36EF129680; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 29B59B80DA9; Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:42 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, softwires@ietf.org Message-Id: <20170317231042.29B59B80DA9@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [Softwires] RFC 8115 on DHCPv6 Option for IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 23:11:21 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8115 Title: DHCPv6 Option for IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes Author: M. Boucadair, J. Qin, T. Tsou, X. Deng Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: March 2017 Mailbox: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, jacni@jacni.com, tina.tsou@philips.com, dxhbupt@gmail.com Pages: 9 Characters: 17386 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-15.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8115 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8115 This document defines a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 6 (DHCPv6) Option for multicast IPv4 service continuity solutions, which is used to carry the IPv6 prefixes to be used to build unicast and multicast IPv4-embedded IPv6 addresses. This document is a product of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Sun Mar 19 20:02:55 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F70129522 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 20:02:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.922 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7i5dTLOP9bDV for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 20:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tsinghua.edu.cn (smtp177.tsinghua.edu.cn [166.111.204.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92395129455 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 20:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from win7-PC (unknown [166.111.68.231]) by app3 (Coremail) with SMTP id DMxvpgB3dm9KRs9YCcpPAg--.3631S2; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:02:35 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:02:34 +0800 From: "=?utf-8?B?TWluZ3dlaSBYdQ==?=" Reply-To: xmw@cernet.edu.cn To: "=?utf-8?B?bW9oYW1lZC5ib3VjYWRhaXJAb3JhbmdlLmNvbQ==?=" , "=?utf-8?B?SWFuIEZhcnJlcg==?=" , "=?utf-8?B?U29mdHdpcmVzLXdn?=" References: <98B15EAF-CE9D-4977-B492-0CA96C872F00@gmx.com>, <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E35842@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> Message-ID: <201703201102330782677@cernet.edu.cn> X-mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 26 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-CM-TRANSID: DMxvpgB3dm9KRs9YCcpPAg--.3631S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7Zr18tw17Jr48WF47ur43GFg_yoW8ZFWrpa 1fAr17Cr4rJr18Aw18ur1Uur4vyFyrJryfJFy5Jr1Iy3yDAF1ktr1vkr95GFyUJrW5JFs8 AF4jkr1UXFs8Aw7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUvmb7Iv0xC_Cr1lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_ Cr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr 0_Cr1UM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj 6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1Y6r17McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr 0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr40E4x8a64kEw24lFcxC0VAYjxAx ZF0Ew4CEw7xC0wCY02Avz4vE14v_Gr4l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxV WUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1Y6r17MIIYrxkI 7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r 1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJr0_WFyUJwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8 JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMVCEFcxC0VAYjxAxZFUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnU UI43ZEXa7xUUeEPUUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: x0pzquphuqv3oohg3hdfq/ Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Softwires] =?utf-8?q?WGLC_For_draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicas?= =?utf-8?q?t_-Please_respond_by_23rd_March?= X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 03:02:54 -0000 SGksIE1lZCwNCg0KVGhhbmsgeW91LiBXZSB3aWxsIHVwZGF0ZSB0aGUgZHJhZnQgYWNjb3JkaW5n IHRvIHlvdXIgY29tbWVudHMuDQoNCk1pbmd3ZWkNCg0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tCQkJCSAN Ck1pbmd3ZWkgWHUNCjIwMTctMDMtMjANCg0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQ0K5Y+R5Lu25Lq677yabW9oYW1lZC5ib3Vj YWRhaXINCuWPkemAgeaXpeacn++8mjIwMTctMDMtMTcgMDA6MDM6NDcNCuaUtuS7tuS6uu+8mklh biBGYXJyZXI7IFNvZnR3aXJlcy13Zw0K5oqE6YCB77yaDQrkuLvpopjvvJpSZTogW1NvZnR3aXJl c10gV0dMQyBGb3IgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1zb2Z0d2lyZS1tZXNoLW11bHRpY2FzdCAtUGxlYXNlIHJl c3BvbmQgYnkgMjNyZCBNYXJjaA0KDQpIaSBJYW4sIGFsbCwNCg0KVGhlIGNvbW1lbnRzIEkgaGF2 ZSBhYm91dCB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50IGFyZSB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nOg0KDQoqIEluc3RlYWQgb2Yg KHJlKXNwZWNpZnlpbmcgdGhlIGJlaGF2aW9yIGl0IHdvdWxkIGJlIG1vcmUgYXBwcm9wcmlhdGUg dG8gcmVmZXIgdG8gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1zb2Z0d2lyZS1kc2xpdGUtbXVsdGljYXN0IChSRkM4MTE0 KSB3aGVuIGl0IG1ha2VzIHNlbnNlIChlLmcuLCBBRkJSIGJlaGF2aW9yLCBhZGRyZXNzIG1hcHBp bmcsIENQLCBEUCwgZXRjLikuIA0KDQoqIFRoZSBkb2N1bWVudCBzYXlzIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmc6 DQoNCiAgIFRoZSBtUHJlZml4NDYgZm9yIFNTTSBtb2RlIGlzIGFsc28gZGVmaW5lZCBpbiBTZWN0 aW9uIDQuMSBvZg0KICAgW1JGQzczNzFdDQoNClRoaXMgaXMgbm90IHRydWUuIFJGQzczNzEgaXMg YWJvdXQgZmxhZyBiaXRzIG5vdCBNUFJFRklYNjQuIA0KDQpJbnN0ZWFkIG9mIHJlZmVycmluZyB0 byBSRkM3MzcxLCBhZGRpbmcgYSBwb2ludGVyIHRvIFNlY3Rpb24gNSBvZiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXNv ZnR3aXJlLWRzbGl0ZS1tdWx0aWNhc3Qgd291bGQgbWFrZSBzZW5zZS4gDQoNCkNoZWVycywNCk1l ZA0KDQo+IC0tLS0tTWVzc2FnZSBkJ29yaWdpbmUtLS0tLQ0KPiBEZcKgOiBTb2Z0d2lyZXMgW21h aWx0bzpzb2Z0d2lyZXMtYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gRGUgbGEgcGFydCBkZSBJYW4NCj4gRmFy cmVyDQo+IEVudm95w6nCoDogamV1ZGkgOSBtYXJzIDIwMTcgMTc6MjINCj4gw4DCoDogU29mdHdp cmVzLXdnDQo+IE9iamV0wqA6IFtTb2Z0d2lyZXNdIFdHTEMgRm9yIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtc29mdHdp cmUtbWVzaC1tdWx0aWNhc3QgLSBQbGVhc2UNCj4gcmVzcG9uZCBieSAyM3JkIE1hcmNoDQo+IA0K PiBIaSwNCj4gDQo+IFRoZSBhdXRob3JzIG9mIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtc29mdHdpcmUtbWVzaC1tdWx0 aWNhc3QtMTUgYmVsaWV2ZSB0aGlzIGRvY3VtZW50DQo+IGlzIHJlYWR5IGZvciBhZHZhbmNlbWVu dC4gV2Ugd291bGQgbGlrZSB0byBpc3N1ZSBhIHR3byB3ZWVrIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXANCj4gbGFz dCBjYWxsIGZpbmlzaGluZyBvbiAyM3JkIE1hcmNoLg0KPiANCj4gUGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgYW55IHN1 YnN0YW50aXZlIGNvbW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGFuZCBleHByZXNzIHlvdXIgb3Bpbmlvbg0K PiBvbiB3aGV0aGVyIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQgaXMgcmVhZHkgZm9yIHB1YmxpY2F0aW9uLiBZb3UgYXJl IGFsc28gd2VsY29tZSB0bw0KPiBzZW5kIHlvdXIgZWRpdG9yaWFsIGNvbW1lbnRzIGRpcmVjdGx5 IHRvIHRoZSBhdXRob3JzLg0KPiANCj4gVGhhbmtzLA0KPiBZb25nICYgSWFuDQo+IA0KPiBfX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPiBTb2Z0d2lyZXMg bWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+IFNvZnR3aXJlc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiBodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9y Zy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3NvZnR3aXJlcw0KDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KU29mdHdpcmVzIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KU29mdHdpcmVz QGlldGYub3JnDQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3NvZnR3aXJl cw0K From nobody Thu Mar 23 13:29:33 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398CC129644; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:29:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.395 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.395 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oWCOeM1otoCI; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FF6C129C06; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.128.20] ([87.78.83.253]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.184]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MVui8-1cgB1322Qq-00X5m8; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:29:25 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Ian Farrer In-Reply-To: <98B15EAF-CE9D-4977-B492-0CA96C872F00@gmx.com> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:29:24 +0100 Cc: draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1C7B2AC9-FDB2-4F80-84AC-B7ACF4959E6A@gmx.com> References: <98B15EAF-CE9D-4977-B492-0CA96C872F00@gmx.com> To: Softwires-wg X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gc7/iHgmffVGBfyNwxgSQvWbIuKC4RKv4QyuH5PrcO32iM0kUzd 3ODIjstcRKOFaQJN37e3EBKVYsS4BK/pxENclLUksusALHkPgX8z6TpAVBCP7zQ4NRHLHPB mKGad54msxZ5uLVlsFwCglZms9AJHVffwjkKsVB3eADA/xCsi+6ha8VeIAVo5XCx23Y6Ggn WTq+HVbEQ8FQvvDtP6obQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:lnt4enJnuaA=:AwfB2KxGgfTs/VlfomZulY PNcW6N+mTbGVNJErspBE8PfOiQ4xT3ycvwXobV12EcXUrHLB89K9FjzWvmjG7rtA6s+kVn/gE E4eKB+i8HTp1IpdBiB5gK1yPSpb1gzBKZdrpTvbrySNHtJG63uAnE0QGUth7O63NQqD8oLTQ4 GUH3oCq+hTe2fjEZsJK6CLGi7meH/bDJABjBbhk1RZv6a7K3s5BNUjkeyAr8TNVkm+sSaVLPz ydYdVgarM+i8U2W4LaxxWIAjNvgs1dkT3q2b4QWyZamL8S41n3bDs+9fop5if0M5IM+hLujQ3 ueZuLmKrlZKAwGiTkjOVmzNLnZKJkXXSb+WIhff+jfvyKoyxd6qpsNy8vDd2ryudL+iShX6zk WF8GAnQLyg2y4gu0rzb0meE5THky3EE+36ibvnkDfHAm7mFojpXRGJBlpd64xcVYkRRIjczrY mUa24X634NnHFipM5v4uf7m8hZ6hcscRRogAzIB/0LwZa+2sd1KCadFDwAGnU1EDC4J78g/sC tVO/ChsfXxuJnSw8N2znlaSgUilinO3n7xNXNMegZwaDyr7F7zlECTnjqQbrnquupX3iPCWks AchubBKi3ZUN4YZgCzc8c54+wl1M0m+WW+FkJMuvaPCUpd9WJtvjgQEsD+gnqGVChS53oStd2 mXIYfxOEO5vCnBWuQ9dGrCgwr1Ru7sMivr13n4h0ss6OdWEy6zTD2qL23r12Niq+2ScZILx8M TRhtuBmFf+qhMZx3xEhW7Cgk9nC/ciULCuDqG6mMnOftDa3E0n6cMtXkOk/dxPgB+6nI34Yka LiOlDEz Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Softwires] WGLC For draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast - Please respond by 23rd March X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 20:29:31 -0000 Hi, Here is my review of the draft. Cheers, Ian Technical/General Comments 4. Mechanism Overview "When the I-IPv6 PIM message arrives at the upstream AFBR, it MUST be = translated back into an E-IPv4 PIM message." As this is in the overview, it doesn't seem the right place to specify = the MUST behavior. Section 5 covers this in detail. Suggest replacing MUST with 'is'. 5.5 Inter-AFBR Signaling This section states that an RP' SHOULD NOT process messages on it's = incoming interface, by introducing an interface agent. However, at this point the text = becomes vague as to whether it is mandatory to have an interface agent implementation. If = you are saying that you should not do something then it would follow there needs to be = an equivalent statement of=20 what you should do instead. Also the functionality of the interface agent is only described as how = it MAY work. This also seems vague. It would be better to describe what the behavior is with = RFC2119 language, and then state something along the lines of 'the mechanism used to achieve = this is left to the implementation, the following diagram provides a possible solution', or = words to that effect. 6.2 Selecting a Tunneling Technology "some AFBRs SHALL not" - The RFC2119 'SHALL' isn't really necessary to = describe how the mechanism is required to fail if a requirement isn't = met. 'will' would be a better word to describe the effects. Sections 6.2 and Section 8 seem to be repetitions. Suggest that they are = combined into a single section. Language/Grammar=20 Abstract - Prosed re-word for readability: The Internet needs to support IPv4 and IPv6 packets. Both address families and their related protocol suites support multicast of the single-source and any-source varieties. During the transition to = IPv6, there will be scenarios where a backbone network running one IP address family internally (referred to as the Internal IP or I-IP) = will provide transit services to client networks running another IP address family (referred to as the External IP or E-IP). It is expected that the I-IP backbone will offer unicast and multicast transit services to the client E-IP networks. Softwire Mesh is a solution that provides E-IP unicast and multicast support across an I-IP backbone. This document describes a mechanism for supporting Internet-style multicast across a set of E-IP and I-IP networks supporting softwire mesh. We focus on the = IPv4- over-IPv6 scenario in this document, due to lack of real-world use cases for the IPv6-over-IPv4 scenario. Section 1 Suggest '..one or more ingress AFBR' is replaced with '..one or more Address Family Border Router (AFBR)' for clarity. Last sentence, last paragraph: "We focus on IPv4-over-IPv6 scenario in this document, due to lack of real-world use cases for IPv6-over-IPv4 scenario." Suggest this is deleted as it is a repetition from the abstract. 2. Terminology Replace=20 o Upstream AFBR: The AFBR router... o Downstream AFBR: The AFBR router... With o Upstream AFBR: An AFBR router... o Downstream AFBR: An AFBR router... 3. Scenarios of Interest This document focus on IPv4-over-IPv6 scenario, however, the following mechanism offers a reference for IPv6-over-IPv4 scenario if needed. This is confusing, as what follows is a diagram of 4over6 mesh m/c. Is = it left in from a previous version of the draft? 4.3 Source Address Mapping Replace Considering that I-IP network... With=20 Considering that the I-IP network... 5.5 Inter-AFBR Signalling Replace "and decide to perform a SPT switchover" with "and decides to perform an SPT switchover" 5.6 SPT Switchover "After a new AFBR expresses its interest in receiving traffic..." sounds = a little=20 anthropomorphic to me:-) Would "After a new AFBR requests the receipt of = traffic..." be better? "...thus no more redundancy will be produced." Is redundancy the right = word here? Would 'unnecessary duplication' be better? 5.7 Other PIM Message Types Replace 'Apart from Join or Prune...' With 'In addition to Join and Prune...'' 6.2 Selecting a Tunneling Technology Replace 'Choosing tunneling technology' with 'Choosing a tunneling technology' 6.3 TTL Suggest 'Processing of TTL' is changed to 'Processing of TTL information = in protocol headers' or similar for clarity. Figure 7 Text This paragraph is quite long and dense and so is difficult to follow. = Suggest that it's broken into shorter paragraphs, or possibly number the diagram = and then have the text as a corresponding numbered list. > On 09 Mar 2017, at 17:21, Ian Farrer wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > The authors of draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-15 believe this = document is ready for advancement. We would like to issue a two week = working group last call finishing on 23rd March. >=20 > Please send any substantive comments to the list and express your = opinion on whether this draft is ready for publication. You are also = welcome to send your editorial comments directly to the authors. >=20 > Thanks, > Yong & Ian >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires From nobody Thu Mar 23 18:42:55 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBF1129410 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:42:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8lVB5B5q-cyu for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:42:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E4F129B10 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:42:50 -0700 (PDT) X-scanvirus: By SEG_CYREN AntiVirus Engine X-scanresult: CLEAN X-MAILFROM: X-RCPTTO: X-FROMIP: 192.168.168.120 X-SEG-Scaned: 1 X-Received: unknown,192.168.168.120,20170324094007 Received: from unknown (HELO out1.zte.com.cn) (192.168.168.120) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Mar 2017 01:40:07 -0000 X-scanvirus: By SEG_CYREN AntiVirus Engine X-scanresult: CLEAN X-MAILFROM: X-RCPTTO: X-FROMIP: 10.30.3.20 X-SEG-Scaned: 1 X-Received: unknown,10.30.3.20,20170324093758 Received: from unknown (HELO mse01.zte.com.cn) (10.30.3.20) by localhost with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 24 Mar 2017 01:37:58 -0000 Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id v2O1g8qm068646; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:42:08 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from meng.wei2@zte.com.cn) Received: from kjyxapp01.zte.com.cn ([10.30.12.200]) by szhqsmtp01.zte.com.cn (Lotus Domino Release 8.5.3FP6) with SMTP id 2017032409421517-3265482 ; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:42:15 +0800 Received: from mapi (kjyxapp05[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid16; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:42:08 +0800 (CST) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:42:08 +0800 (CST) X-Zmail-TransId: 2b0758d47970ffffffffd7b-b4be6 X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0 Message-ID: <201703240942086568191@zte.com.cn> References: 98B15EAF-CE9D-4977-B492-0CA96C872F00@gmx.com0 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: To: Cc: X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on SZHQSMTP01/server/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2017-03-24 09:42:15, Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2017-03-24 09:42:07, Serialize complete at 2017-03-24 09:42:07 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next=====" X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn v2O1g8qm068646 X-HQIP: 127.0.0.1 X-HQIP: 127.0.0.1 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Softwires] =?utf-8?q?WGLC_For_draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicas?= =?utf-8?q?t_-_Please_respond_by_23rd_March?= X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 01:42:54 -0000 --=====_001_next===== Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="=====_002_next=====" --=====_002_next===== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====_003_next=====" --=====_003_next===== Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" SGkNCg0KDQogICBzdXBwb3J0ICsxDQoNCiBUaGFua3MsDQoNCldlaQ0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQrljp/lp4vpgq7k u7YNCg0KDQoNCuWPkeS7tuS6uu+8miDvvJxpYW5mYXJyZXJAZ214LmNvbe+8ng0K5pS25Lu25Lq6 77yaIO+8nHNvZnR3aXJlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ++8ng0K5pelIOacnyDvvJoyMDE35bm0MDPmnIgxMOaX pSAwMDo1MQ0K5Li7IOmimCDvvJpbU29mdHdpcmVzXSBXR0xDIEZvciBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXNvZnR3 aXJlLW1lc2gtbXVsdGljYXN0IC0gUGxlYXNlIHJlc3BvbmQgYnkgMjNyZCBNYXJjaA0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCkhpLA0KDQpUaGUgYXV0aG9ycyBvZiBkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXNvZnR3aXJlLW1lc2gtbXVsdGlj YXN0LTE1IGJlbGlldmUgdGhpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBpcyByZWFkeSBmb3IgYWR2YW5jZW1lbnQuIFdl IHdvdWxkIGxpa2UgdG8gaXNzdWUgYSB0d28gd2VlayB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGxhc3QgY2FsbCBm aW5pc2hpbmcgb24gMjNyZCBNYXJjaC4NCg0KUGxlYXNlIHNlbmQgYW55IHN1YnN0YW50aXZlIGNv bW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGFuZCBleHByZXNzIHlvdXIgb3BpbmlvbiBvbiB3aGV0aGVyIHRo aXMgZHJhZnQgaXMgcmVhZHkgZm9yIHB1YmxpY2F0aW9uLiBZb3UgYXJlIGFsc28gd2VsY29tZSB0 byBzZW5kIHlvdXIgZWRpdG9yaWFsIGNvbW1lbnRzIGRpcmVjdGx5IHRvIHRoZSBhdXRob3JzLg0K DQpUaGFua3MsDQpZb25nICYgSWFuDQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpTb2Z0d2lyZXMgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpTb2Z0d2lyZXNAaWV0Zi5v cmcNCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vc29mdHdpcmVz --=====_003_next===== Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/html ; charset="UTF-8" PGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iemNvbnRlbnRSb3ciPiA8cD48YnI+PC9wPjxwPkhpPGJyPjwvcD48cD4mbmJz cDsgJm5ic3A7c3VwcG9ydCArMTwvcD48cD4mbmJzcDtUaGFua3MsPC9wPjxwPldlaTwvcD48cD48 YnI+PC9wPjxwPjxicj48L3A+PHA+PGJyPjwvcD48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJ6TWFpbFNpZ24iPjxkaXY+ PGRpdj48ZGl2PjxkaXY+PGRpdj48ZGl2PjxkaXY+PGRpdj48cCBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 IOWui+S9kzsgZm9udC1zaXplOiA3LjBweDsgbGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6IG5vcm1hbDsgd2lkb3dzOiAx OyI+PGJyPjwvcD48cCBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOiA3LjBweDsgbGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6IG5vcm1h bDsgd2lkb3dzOiAxOyI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMHB4O2NvbG9yOiM1ODU5NUI7 Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk65b6u6L2v6ZuF6buRO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTogNy4wcHg7Ij48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxz cGFuIHN0eWxlPSJsaW5lLWhlaWdodDogbm9ybWFsOyB3aWRvd3M6IDE7IGZvbnQtc2l6ZTogNy4w cHg7O2NvbG9yOiM1ODU5NWI7Zm9udC1zaXplOjEwcHgiPjwvc3Bhbj48L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj48L2Rp dj48L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJ6TWFpbEZy b20iPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iemhpc3RvcnlSb3ciIHN0eWxlPSJkaXNwbGF5OmJs b2NrIj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJ6aGlzdG9yeURlcyIgc3R5bGU9IndpZHRoOiAxMDAlOyBoZWlnaHQ6 IDI4cHg7IGxpbmUtaGVpZ2h0OiAyOHB4OyBiYWNrZ3JvdW5kLWNvbG9yOiAjRTBFNUU5OyBjb2xv cjogIzEzODhGRjsgdGV4dC1hbGlnbjogY2VudGVyOyIgbGFuZ3VhZ2UtZGF0YT0iSGlzdG9yeU9y Z1R4dCI+5Y6f5aeL6YKu5Lu2PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBpZD0iendyaXRlSGlzdG9yeUNvbnRhaW5lciI+ PGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iY29udHJvbC1ncm91cCB6aGlzdG9yeVBhbmVsIj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJ6aGlz dG9yeUhlYWRlciIgc3R5bGU9InBhZGRpbmc6IDhweDsgYmFja2dyb3VuZC1jb2xvcjogI0Y1RjZG ODsiPjxkaXY+PHN0cm9uZyBsYW5ndWFnZS1kYXRhPSJIaXN0b3J5U2VuZGVyVHh0Ij7lj5Hku7bk urrvvJo8L3N0cm9uZz48c3BhbiBjbGFzcz0ienJlYWRVc2VyTmFtZSI+IO+8nGlhbmZhcnJlckBn bXguY29t77yeOzwvc3Bhbj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PjxzdHJvbmcgbGFuZ3VhZ2UtZGF0YT0iSGlzdG9y eVRPVHh0Ij7mlLbku7bkurrvvJo8L3N0cm9uZz48c3BhbiBjbGFzcz0ienJlYWRVc2VyTmFtZSIg c3R5bGU9ImRpc3BsYXk6IGlubGluZS1ibG9jazsiPiDvvJxzb2Z0d2lyZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmfvvJ47 PC9zcGFuPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PHN0cm9uZyBsYW5ndWFnZS1kYXRhPSJIaXN0b3J5RGF0ZVR4dCI+ 5pelIOacnyDvvJo8L3N0cm9uZz48c3BhbiBjbGFzcz0iIj4yMDE35bm0MDPmnIgxMOaXpSAwMDo1 MTwvc3Bhbj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PjxzdHJvbmcgbGFuZ3VhZ2UtZGF0YT0iSGlzdG9yeVN1YmplY3RU eHQiPuS4uyDpopgg77yaPC9zdHJvbmc+PHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9InpyZWFkVGl0bGUiPjxzdHJvbmc+ W1NvZnR3aXJlc10gV0dMQyBGb3IgZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1zb2Z0d2lyZS1tZXNoLW11bHRpY2FzdCAt IFBsZWFzZSByZXNwb25kIGJ5IDIzcmQgTWFyY2g8L3N0cm9uZz48L3NwYW4+PC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+ PHAgY2xhc3M9InpoaXN0b3J5Q29udGVudCI+PGJyPjwvcD48ZGl2PkhpLDxicj48YnI+VGhlJm5i c3A7YXV0aG9ycyZuYnNwO29mJm5ic3A7ZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1zb2Z0d2lyZS1tZXNoLW11bHRpY2Fz dC0xNSZuYnNwO2JlbGlldmUmbmJzcDt0aGlzJm5ic3A7ZG9jdW1lbnQmbmJzcDtpcyZuYnNwO3Jl YWR5Jm5ic3A7Zm9yJm5ic3A7YWR2YW5jZW1lbnQuJm5ic3A7V2UmbmJzcDt3b3VsZCZuYnNwO2xp a2UmbmJzcDt0byZuYnNwO2lzc3VlJm5ic3A7YSZuYnNwO3R3byZuYnNwO3dlZWsmbmJzcDt3b3Jr aW5nJm5ic3A7Z3JvdXAmbmJzcDtsYXN0Jm5ic3A7Y2FsbCZuYnNwO2ZpbmlzaGluZyZuYnNwO29u Jm5ic3A7MjNyZCZuYnNwO01hcmNoLjxicj48YnI+UGxlYXNlJm5ic3A7c2VuZCZuYnNwO2FueSZu YnNwO3N1YnN0YW50aXZlJm5ic3A7Y29tbWVudHMmbmJzcDt0byZuYnNwO3RoZSZuYnNwO2xpc3Qm bmJzcDthbmQmbmJzcDtleHByZXNzJm5ic3A7eW91ciZuYnNwO29waW5pb24mbmJzcDtvbiZuYnNw O3doZXRoZXImbmJzcDt0aGlzJm5ic3A7ZHJhZnQmbmJzcDtpcyZuYnNwO3JlYWR5Jm5ic3A7Zm9y Jm5ic3A7cHVibGljYXRpb24uJm5ic3A7WW91Jm5ic3A7YXJlJm5ic3A7YWxzbyZuYnNwO3dlbGNv bWUmbmJzcDt0byZuYnNwO3NlbmQmbmJzcDt5b3VyJm5ic3A7ZWRpdG9yaWFsJm5ic3A7Y29tbWVu dHMmbmJzcDtkaXJlY3RseSZuYnNwO3RvJm5ic3A7dGhlJm5ic3A7YXV0aG9ycy48YnI+PGJyPlRo YW5rcyw8YnI+WW9uZyZuYnNwOyZhbXA7Jm5ic3A7SWFuPGJyPjxicj5fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXzxicj5Tb2Z0d2lyZXMmbmJzcDttYWlsaW5n Jm5ic3A7bGlzdDxicj5Tb2Z0d2lyZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmc8YnI+aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcv bWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9zb2Z0d2lyZXM8YnI+PC9kaXY+PHA+PGJyPjwvcD48L2Rpdj48L2Rp dj48L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj48cD48YnI+PC9wPiA8L2Rpdj4= --=====_003_next=====-- --=====_002_next=====-- --=====_001_next=====-- From nobody Fri Mar 31 01:18:19 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietf.org Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C79129504; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 01:18:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: softwires@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.49.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <149094829186.8931.906004786246323123@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 01:18:11 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-11.txt X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:18:12 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Softwires of the IETF. Title : RADIUS Attribute for Softwire Address plus Port based Mechanisms Authors : Sheng Jiang Yu Fu Bing Liu Peter Deacon Chongfeng Xie Tianxiang Li Filename : draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-11.txt Pages : 23 Date : 2017-03-31 Abstract: IPv4-over-IPv6 transition mechanisms provide both IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity services simultaneously during the IPv4/IPv6 co-existing period. The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) options have been defined to configure Customer Edge (CE) in MAP-E, MAP-T, and Lightweight 4over6. However, in many networks, the configuration information may be stored in an Authentication Authorization and Accounting (AAA) server, while user configuration information is mainly provided by the Broadband Network Gateway (BNG) through the DHCPv6 protocol. This document defines two new Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) attributes that carry CE configuration information from an AAA server to BNG. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-11 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-11 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-11 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Mar 31 10:47:24 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: softwires@ietf.org Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E581299D4; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:47:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: softwires@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.49.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <149098243770.4324.17789944164293351172@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:47:17 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-16.txt X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: softwires wg discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:47:18 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Softwires of the IETF. Title : Softwire Mesh Multicast Authors : Mingwei Xu Yong Cui Jianping Wu Shu Yang Chris Metz Greg Shepherd Filename : draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-16.txt Pages : 19 Date : 2017-03-31 Abstract: The Internet needs to support IPv4 and IPv6 packets. Both address families and their related protocol suites support multicast of the single-source and any-source varieties. During IPv6 transition, there will be scenarios where a backbone network running one IP address family internally (referred to as internal IP or I-IP) will provide transit services to attached client networks running another IP address family (referred to as external IP or E-IP). It is expected that the I-IP backbone will offer unicast and multicast transit services to the client E-IP networks. Softwire Mesh is a solution providing E-IP unicast and multicast support across an I-IP backbone. This document describes the mechanism for supporting Internet-style multicast across a set of E-IP and I-IP networks supporting softwire mesh. We focus on IPv4- over-IPv6 scenario in this document, due to lack of real-world use cases for IPv6-over-IPv4 scenario. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-16 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-16 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-16 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/