Subject: RE: [Speechsc] speechsc protocol issues

From: "BRANDT,MARC (HP-France,ex2)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:34:23 +0100

Initially on this thread I put a question re the MMUSIC activity below.
I have not seen yet opinions of SPEECHSC on that ?

(other refs:
XML Schema for Media Control in the mmusic minutes
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/working-groups/mmusic/current/msg01105.htm
l 
draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-levin-mmusic-xml-media-control-00.
txt
)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Orit Levin [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:48 PM
> To: 'Colin Perkins'; [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] Draft MMUSIC minutes from Atlanta
> 
> 
> 
> According to my recollection, the chairs expressed their will 
> to consult the
> IETF authorities regarding the place this kind of work should 
> take and come
> back with the answer.
> 
> Thanks,
> Orit Levin
> Chief Architect
> RADVISION
> Phone: +1.201.6896330
> Video: +1.201.6896430
> 
> 
> > XML Schema for Media Control
> ...skip
> >    Jonathan Rosenberg noted that this might be a perfect 
> candidate for a
> >    SOAP protocol, signalled in SDP? Henning agreed that 
> SOAP works today,
> >    but there is a need for a way of associating SOAP 
> connections with a
> >    media stream, in SDP. Orit asked where should we do SOAP 
> work, since
> >    it is unclear if MMUSIC is the appropriate forum? The 
> answer seems to
> >    depend on the form of the final solution.
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

Marc Brandt      - mailto:[email-masked]
Hewlett-Packard  - OpenCall Business Unit
http://www.hp.com/go/opencall/
_______________________________________________
Speechsc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speechsc