Subject: Re: [spfbis] #3: RFC 4408 - Errata #99

From: S Moonesamy <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:23:23 -0700

Hi Scott,
At 13:25 20-02-2012, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>The I.D. that I prepared as the input document for the working group has the
>editorial errata corrected already.  It might be simpler to start from that.

As there isn't any IESG Note in the draft, we can close this one.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy