From nobody Tue Oct 25 03:14:48 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD501294A1 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 03:14:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.033 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UAp85V0i6Uuy for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 03:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C7D8129494 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 03:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 465D5B81107; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 03:14:45 -0700 (PDT) To: scott@kitterman.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, sm+ietf@elandsys.com, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20161025101445.465D5B81107@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 03:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: spfbis@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, vesely@tana.it Subject: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4841) X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SPFbis discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:14:46 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7208, "Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7208&eid=4841 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Alessandro Vesely Section: 3.5. Original Text ------------- EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM *.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM A.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM *.A.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM Corrected Text -------------- EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM. *.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM. A.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM. *.A.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM. Notes ----- This is an editorial errata, since it is a punctuation error. It is not technical, because the example might have implied an $ORIGIN of "." or some other strange setting, while a normative reference --rfc 1035-- makes it very clear that "[d]omain names that end in a dot are called absolute, and are taken as complete." Hence no technical meaning is affected. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7208 (draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-21) -------------------------------------- Title : Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1 Publication Date : April 2014 Author(s) : S. Kitterman Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : SPF Update Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Sun Oct 30 22:56:36 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF709129530 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:56:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.287 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=ERdBx1WM; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=adenXXku Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2RMcTGXqdXUO for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5732212952E for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:56:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.227.87.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9V5u9wF002868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:56:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1477893385; x=1477979785; bh=Uld5ov59NvYmt1LjHEEcTR5eZleiP3YsL4QUWrlOiMo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=ERdBx1WMGbupRoiHWGVPX6X7PDLjRDb8Tu8NNob41cDMQiPtvIlabCpLY/rfMtvht QAVWcPocjuADcD3uPuQBkXG1QM3Sx770iF/396LQtwblnQou3NEq+U0QihIYfmBYQc yn81rZNDLKE+uiQox3kicfQRglEcE69kQcEgb/s8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1477893385; x=1477979785; i=@elandsys.com; bh=Uld5ov59NvYmt1LjHEEcTR5eZleiP3YsL4QUWrlOiMo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=adenXXkusuN01exohL8GJVV4YS1CE3sRoIb6Cm1pXOD+M7C0PIpeIGIM3u0kfPIfT UlqIV8EHcmH0+1SydNhQ+yyeTlEF1bdCrqF2smK713K9ZakLyCGqYQCUU1UGaC2JFU UPX5wC5CLDYFocj+cqbjQ4emN500fldemhz4QYsg= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20161030224616.0cbc7058@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:56:00 -0700 To: RFC Errata System , scott@kitterman.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com From: S Moonesamy In-Reply-To: <20161025101445.465D5B81107@rfc-editor.org> References: <20161025101445.465D5B81107@rfc-editor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Archived-At: Cc: spfbis@ietf.org, vesely@tana.it Subject: Re: [spfbis] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4841) X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SPFbis discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 05:56:34 -0000 Hello, At 03:14 25-10-2016, RFC Errata System wrote: >The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7208, >"Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in >Email, Version 1". > >-------------------------------------- >You may review the report below and at: >http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7208&eid=4841 > >-------------------------------------- >Type: Editorial >Reported by: Alessandro Vesely > >Section: 3.5. > >Original Text >------------- > EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM > *.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM > A.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM > *.A.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM > > > >Corrected Text >-------------- > EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM. > *.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM. > A.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM. > *.A.EXAMPLE.COM. MX 10 A.EXAMPLE.COM. > > >Notes >----- >This is an editorial errata, since it is a punctuation error. > >It is not technical, because the example might have implied an >$ORIGIN of "." or some other strange setting, while a normative >reference --rfc 1035-- makes it very clear that "[d]omain names that >end in a dot are called absolute, and are taken as complete." Hence >no technical meaning is affected. There is a dot at the end of the names in the L.H.S. It should be similar for the R.H.S. I suggest marking this erratum as "verified". Regards, S. Moonesamy From nobody Mon Oct 31 02:13:59 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD9B129585 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:13:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.287 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=wjWBzfWI; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=GCl7YSQU Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RgBkWukeEO8O for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65153129579 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.227.87.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9V9DRSV002979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:13:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1477905224; x=1477991624; bh=qQqiCedNs38/jyN5owcaafZcZlB+ZLb9MVSmarTbwAQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=wjWBzfWIc17BLCouOqTro4Zi/NBAwhpUJTPhxNbGqm+aS/pJ+DXSGGFQtcFY8NFKE MfchX45W2XqhPL/7JtC2cKz9BjultWauIVCX5rvxDEvxwE3z7+iShsC2D3VGqwZIcu sKTZKfTySLshAkxxLPhS/qbyVxhNT6xa3+ThYiFQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1477905224; x=1477991624; i=@elandsys.com; bh=qQqiCedNs38/jyN5owcaafZcZlB+ZLb9MVSmarTbwAQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=GCl7YSQUOjOi0kJslbXRImtahq7g7Gf1Xyw70DhGFDy1PDUudymZzM0bJSMFb4zxq P05jTU3yWlYzyJKFuCLwyNfn0udwMfpEPaLP1QB3C+SR/EKq0+YhoxC2xBuThzehB8 VOaMwByBgrqely1Wpf4XWmYyCN2qzdv7cJmLzBbM= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20161031020633.0b911418@elandnews.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:12:23 -0700 To: RFC Errata System , scott@kitterman.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, ajs@anvilwalrusden.com From: S Moonesamy In-Reply-To: <20160727070419.37175B80C1B@rfc-editor.org> References: <20160727070419.37175B80C1B@rfc-editor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Archived-At: Cc: spfbis@ietf.org, kenmortimer@gmail.com Subject: Re: [spfbis] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7208 (4751) X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SPFbis discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:13:58 -0000 Hello, At 00:04 27-07-2016, RFC Errata System wrote: >The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7208, >"Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in >Email, Version 1". > >-------------------------------------- >You may review the report below and at: >http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7208&eid=4751 > >-------------------------------------- >Type: Technical >Reported by: Ken Mortimer > >Section: 5.5 > >Original Text >------------- >This mechanism matches if > >o the is a subdomain of a validated domain name, or > >o the and a validated domain name are the same. > >Corrected Text >-------------- >This mechanism matches if > >o a validated domain name is a subdomain of the , or > >o the and a validated domain name are the same. > >Notes >----- >The first bullet point is in contradiction to the description of the >ptr mechanism evaluation in the preceding paragraph: >"Check all validated domain names to see if they either match the > domain or are a subdomain of the domain. >If any do, this mechanism matches. If no validated domain name can >be found, or if none of the validated domain names match or are a >subdomain of the , this mechanism fails to match." I suggest marking this erratum as "verified". Regards, S. Moonesamy