Subject: [spring] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-01.txt

From: "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 14:23:19 +0000

All,

despite the large consensus draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-00 
already got on the list, and in order to address the few comments we
received about the lack of use cases details in the draft, the authors 
decided to include in the problem-statement draft the use-cases originally 
described in draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-use-cases. 

We took the use cases, obviously without any reference to a solution, and 
inserted them into the problem statement draft. We will rework the segment
routing use cases draft in order not to have duplicated text.

Hope this will increase the substantial consensus 
draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement already has.

Thanks.
s.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: <[email-masked]>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-01.txt
> Date: March 28, 2014 3:17:51 PM GMT+01:00
> To: Stefano Previdi <[email-masked]>, Bruno Decraene <[email-masked]>, Ruediger Geib <[email-masked]>, "Martin Horneffer" <[email-masked]>, Ruediger Geib <[email-masked]>, Martin Horneffer <[email-masked]>, Rob Shakir <[email-masked]>, Stephane Litkowski <[email-masked]>, Clarence Filsfils <[email-masked]>, Bruno Decraene <[email-masked]>, Stefano Previdi <[email-masked]>, Robert Raszuk <[email-masked]>, Clarence Filsfils <[email-masked]>, Rob Shakir <[email-masked]>, Robert Raszuk <[email-masked]>, Stephane Litkowski <[email-masked]>
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-01.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Stefano Previdi and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Name:		draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement
> Revision:	01
> Title:		SPRING Problem Statement and Requirements
> Document date:	2014-03-28
> Group:		spring
> Pages:		19
> URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-01.txt
> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement/
> Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-01
> Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-01
> 
> Abstract:
>   The ability for a node to specify a forwarding path, other than the
>   normal shortest path, that a particular packet will traverse,
>   benefits a number of network functions.  Source-based routing
>   mechanisms have previously been specified for network protocols, but
>   have not seen widespread adoption.  In this context, the term
>   'source' means 'the point at which the explicit route is imposed'.
> 
>   This document outlines various use cases, with their requirements,
>   that need to be taken into account by the Source Packet Routing in
>   Networking (SPRING) architecture.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
>