Subject: Re: [spring] IPR Claims related to draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement

From: Rob Shakir <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:20:16 +0100

On 13 Mar 2014, at 21:10, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> In parallel to the WG Adoption Call for this draft, I want to formally ask the authors (no additional contributors are listed in the latest version of the draft) to please respond to this message indicating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.  The draft will not progress (pending the results of the WG Adoption Call) until we have received a response from each author.
> 
> Note:  Given that the draft should be representing use cases, there is an expectation that no IPR is present.  If there is, the WG will likely ask you to remove any related text.

Hi Alvaro,

And again — sorry for the delay. I’m not aware of any IPR claims related to material discussed in this draft.

Kind regards,
r.