Subject: Re: [spring] Re.: SPRING OpenFlow interworking discussion

From: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 09:16:08 -0400

​​Dear ​Alvaro,

Thank you. We are fine here now that
Hurricane Arthur has moved out of our area.

Yes, we are working on this (SPRING OpenFlow interworking) and look fwd. to
publish
a draft before the IETF90 mtg. dates.

If it is possible to allocate few minutes near the end
of the SPRING WG mtg. for open discussion, may be
we can bring this topics up for further comments/ suggestions.

Many thanks again.

Best.

Bhumip

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:47 PM,
​​
Alvaro Retana (aretana) <[email-masked]> wrote:

>  On 7/1/14 10:59 AM, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>  Bhumip:
>
>  Hi!  How are you?
>
>   Would there be any opportunity to discuss
> SPRING OpenFlow interworking during the Toronto (IETF-90) mtg.?
>
>
>  If you're asking about time in the meeting..then then answer might be
> "yes" if there is a published draft to discuss and time in the agenda.  So
> far we haven't ironed out the whole agenda.
>
>     It may be useful to include a statement like
> the following sentence in Sec. 6 (Interoperability with non-SPRING nodes)
> of the SPRING problem
> statement draft (draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-01.txt).
>
> "Interoperability with openFlow (https://www.opennetworking.org/sdn
> -resources/onf-specifications/openflow) based non-SPRING nodes will be
> discussed  in a future document."
>
>
>  I'll let the authors of that draft comment..but this is a good time to
> put use cases forward.
>
>  Best regards!
>
>  Alvaro.
>